DOCSLIB.ORG

A Response to Hattab and Menn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Response to Hattab and Menn On Laws and Ends: A Response to Hattab and Menn Dennis Des Chene Johns Hopkins University From the topics discussed by Hattab and Menn, I examine two of special im- portance. The ªrst is that of active powers: does the Cartesian natural world contain any, or is the apparent efªcacy of natural agents always to be re- ferred to God? In arguing that it is, I consider, following Hattab, Descartes characterization of natural laws as secondary causes. The second topic is that of ends. Menn argues, and I agree, that in late Aristotelianism Aris- totles own conception of an art in things has been abandoned. The point is reinforced when one considers the general divine ends which must be in- voked in cases of aborted action. In them no individual agent attains its end. Yet Nature as a whole continues to act toward ends. I suggest that those general ends, to which Suárez, for example, refers, may have served later philosophers, especially Malebranche, in combining the Cartesian notion of law with a teleological interpretation of nature that Descartes, for his part, rejected. In the transition from Aristotelian natural philosophymore speciªcally, that version which Menn calls liberal Jesuit Scholasticismto the mechanistic philosophy of the new science, two questions are of funda- mental importance in the explanation of natural events and our relation to them as knowing subjects and as agents. The ªrst is that of agency, the second that of the laws of nature. The Aristotelian philosophy takes natu- ral change to be the work of active powers in nature itself, in which God concurs. The Cartesian interprets it as the work of God alone, subject to natural laws, appeal to which will help demonstrate the observed regulari- ties which by the Aristotelian are referred to the intrinsic powers of mate- rial things, and to the ends toward which they act. By the question of agency, then, I mean in particular the question Where are the active powers that bring about change in the natural Perspectives on Science 2000, vol. 8, no. 2 ©2000 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology 144 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/106361400568055 by guest on 26 September 2021 Perspectives on Science 145 world? Hattabs paper, after discussing Descartes conception of force, de- votes itself to arguing that when he calls the laws of nature secondary causes, he should be taken at his word. It then explains how laws can be regarded as causes at all, and how they might occupy the role which in late Aristotelian physics was occupied by the active powers of natural agents. I remain, nevertheless, puzzled both by Descartes terminology and by the notion of laws as causes, and I will show why. The question of ends is yet simpler: Are there any? Or, more pointedly: Are there any ends other than those intended by rational agents? Certainly we conceive of some of our actions as directed to an end. We conceive of God likewise as having acted, in establishing the constitution of the natu- ral and human worlds, and in those particular interventions recorded in texts held true by faith, to accomplish various ends. In Physiologia I argued that for the Aristotelian philosophers I was concerned with, Aristotles own conception of ends as intrinsic to natural agents had become increas- ingly opaque. Another conceptionthat the ends of natural agents are in- tended by Godhad largely usurped its place. Adopting that conception, however, gave urgency to the problem of retaining for natural agents any genuine efªcacy. If art is no longer in things, but only in divine or human intellects, then natural agents seem to be reduced to instruments. That outcome, though welcomed by Descartes, was rejected by the Aristo- telians. On this, I think, Menn and I agree. We disagree on the interpreta- tion of Suárezs position, so I will do my best to clarify matters.1 1. Where is agency? The ªrst topic, then, is agency and active powers. For Aristotelians, in every natural change, there is an agent and a patient. The difference is real: it does not depend on our conception. Just as real are the powers by which agents act. The efªcient cause of a natural change is an agent designated from the point of view of the effect it produces in the patient, to which it 1. Since I have mentioned Aristotelianism several times, I will now exercise the au- thors privilege of retrospective revision. I should have emphasized more than I did in Physiologia that the Aristotelians in question are those that Menn calls liberal Jesuit Scho- lastics. Generalizations about Aristotelianism, even in the relatively brief period I exam- ined, must be either very broadly stated or limited in scope. Even among those who adopted Thomas Aquinas as their patron, there are major differences of opinion; the differ- ences grow all the greater if one takes in Scotists, Nominalists, or mavericks like Zabarella. Combining ideas from Ed Grant and Dan Sperber, I would take Aristotelianism to denote neither an essence nor a natural kind, but a massive and heterogeneous collection of con- cepts, methods, and doctrines endemic to the learned world of the period, which may be likened to a biological population (Grant 1987). Like inºuenza and other successful patho- gens it was easily transmissible and amenable to variation, and therefore capable of surviv- ing in diverse environment (Sperber 1996). Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/106361400568055 by guest on 26 September 2021 146 Laws and Ends gives, as all causes do, being. It brings into existence a quality like heat or even introduces a new substantial form into pre-existing matter. Unlike the material or formal causes the efªcient cause is extrinsic to its effect, even if per accidens cause and effect are identical individuals. That is far from the whole story, but it will do for now. The question at hand is: where is agency? In particular, do secondary causes have any efªcacy of their own, or are they instead like a carpenters saw, modulating the effects of the First Cause, but not themselves even the proximate principle of any action? It is agreed that God not only creates and conserves all other beings, but must allow, indeed co-operate with, their actions. Can a natural, nonrational, agent nevertheless beI quote here Suárezs version of the deªnitionthe ªrst principle from which there is an action, or again from which the effect exists, by way of an ac- tion (Disp. 17§1¶6; Suárez [1856] 1965, 25:582)? Descartes answer is No. That natural agents have no active powers whatsoever follows immediately from the deªnition of corporeal sub- stance or body as res extensa. If there are efªcient causes acting in nature other than God, they cannot be bodies. Descartes says that laws are causes, but ªrst one other candidate must be considered: force. Hattab has given a clear summary of the section in Physiologia where I sort out the interpreta- tions of Hatªeld, Gueroult, Gabbey, and Garber. From that discussion I arrive at what she calls a double-aspect interpretation of force. There is no one thing of which one can say both that it is a mover of bodies, an ac- tive power, and that it is measured by the quantity volume times speed. Volume and speed, and derivatively the product of the two, pertain to bodies; activity to God. In the case where a body at rest successfully resists a moving bodyas in Descartes fourth rule of collisionthe natural inertia possessed by every body, at rest or not, does not yield a force of resistance sufªcient to explain the outcome. The moving body can have any speed whatever; yet the body at rest, provided only that it is larger, will not budge. The usual factor measuring the conversion of the moving bodys quantity of motion into a quantity of motion in the body at rest, namely the ratio of the mov- ing bodys volume to that of the resting body, will not yield what Des- cartes wants. Instead the body at rest behaves as if it were part of some more inclusive body, as large as need be to compel the moving body to re- verse its course. From the standpoint of the smaller moving body, the force opposing its continued motion is effectively inªnite. In trying to grasp what Descartes had in mind in formulating the rules of collision, and considering the references to divine action in his argu- ments for the laws of nature, I suggested that we should think of the mov- ing force attributed to God as consisting in his concurrence, governed by Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/106361400568055 by guest on 26 September 2021 Perspectives on Science 147 those laws, in the changes that occur when bodies meet; but that the indeªnitely large force of resistance exhibited by some bodies at rest would be better referred to conservation. Hattab raises two questions. The ªrst concerns the parallel between static forces and conservation. I made two comparisons of this sort. One comparison, deriving ultimately from Bonaventura, is between conserva- tion and the force exerted by a nail, say, when it holds up a picture. This was by way of trying to understand how (as Gueroult believes) conserva- tion could be thought of as a force at all (Gueroult [1954] 1970). The other Ive just mentioned. Moving force is measured by volume times speed. But force of resistance, which as the force of a body at rest is in a sense static, is effectively inªnite.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ibn Rushd's Response to Ibn Sina and Al
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 8 Original Research Ibn Rushd’s response to Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali’s philosophical thoughts on cosmology Authors: This study is based on the many cosmological problems in Islam as aspects of thought that Taufiqurrahman receive serious attention. In fact, there are also many polemics of thought that occur amongst Taufiqurrahman1 R. Yuli Akhmad Hambali2 Muslim scholars, which can be divided into two main groups: traditionalists and rationalists. The traditionalists, represented by Al-Ghazali and the Ash’ariyah theologians, put forward Affiliations: their cosmological thinking on the principle of God’s absolute will, while the rationalists, 1Department of Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam, Faculty of especially those represented by Avicenna (Ibn Sina), proposed their cosmological thinking Ushuluddin, UIN Imam Bonjol based on the theory of emanation from Plotinus in terms of its creation and the concept of a Padang, Padang, Indonesia geocentric Ptolameus in terms of its structure. In this conflict of thought between the two groups, Averroes (Ibn Rushd) proposed a cosmological thought different from the two. This 2Department of Aqidah dan study seeks to elaborate on the thought of Ibn Rushd’s cosmology which is different from that Filsafat Islam, Faculty of Ushuluddin, UIN Sunan of Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali. Gunung Djati Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia Contribution: This research provides a clear understanding of the cosmological thoughts put forward by earlier Muslim thinkers. In particular, it wants to bridge the differences regarding Corresponding author: the concept of cosmology as put forward by Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali and how Ibn Rushd Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman, bridges the two.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metaphysics of Agency: Avicenna and His Legacy
    The Metaphysics of Agency: Avicenna and his Legacy by Kara Richardson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Philosophy University of Toronto ©Copyright by Kara Richardson 2008 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-58078-3 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-58078-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of the Development of Augustine's Doctrine of Grace By
    In Defense of the Development of Augustine’s Doctrine of Grace by Laban Omondi Agisa Submitted to the faculty of the School of Theology of the University of the South in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Sacred Theology January 2020 Sewanee, Tennessee Approved ____________________________ _______________ Adviser Date ____________________________ _______________ Second Adviser Date 2 DECLARATION I declare that this is my original work and has not been presented in any other institution for consideration of any certification. This work has been complemented by sources duly acknowledged and cited using Chicago Manual Style. Signature Date 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My study of theology was initiated in 2009 by the then Provost of St. Stephens Cathedral, Nairobi, the late Ven. Canon John Ndung’u who was a great encouragement to me. This was further made possible through my bishop the Rt. Rev. Joel Waweru and the Rev. Geoffrey Okapisi who were sources of inspiration. My studies at Carlile College (Church Army Africa) and St. Paul’s University laid a strong theological foundation and I appreciate among others the influence of the Rev. Dr. John Kiboi who introduced me to Philosophy, Systematic Theology, Ethics, and African Christian Theology that eventually became the foundation for my studies at the University of the South. I also appreciate the encouragement of my lecturers Mrs. Tabitha Waweru and Dr. Scholarstica Githinji during my Study of Education at Kenya Technical Trainers College and at Daystar University respectively. My interest in this topic came as a result of many sittings with two professors at the University of the South, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Consciousness
    1 What is it like to be a group agent? Christian List June-July 20151 The existence of group agents is relatively widely accepted. Examples are corporations, courts, NGOs, and even entire states. But should we also accept that there is such a thing as group consciousness? In this paper, I give an overview of some of the key issues in this debate and sketch a tentative argument for the view that group agents lack phenomenal consciousness, contrary to a recent suggestion by Schwitzgebel (2015). In developing my argument, I draw on integrated information theory, a much-discussed theory of consciousness. I conclude by pointing out an implication of my argument for the normative status of group agents. 1. Introduction It is, by now, relatively widely accepted that suitably organized collectives can be intentional agents in their own right, over and above their individual members (see, e.g., French 1984; Rovane 1997; Pettit 2001, ch. 5, 2003; List and Pettit 2006, 2011; Tollefsen 2002, 2015; Tuomela 2013). 2 Examples of group agents include commercial corporations, collegial courts, non-governmental organizations, even states in their entirety. Like an individual human being, a group agent has purposes and intentions and pursues these through its actions. In doing so, it can be as rational as an individual rational agent, at least when we understand rationality in the way decision theorists do. For example, a firm’s behaviour in the market place can be well understood by modeling it as a rational utility maximizer, and corporations often fit the model of homo economicus better – and to a scarier extent – than most individual human beings do.
    [Show full text]
  • The Agency of Prayers and Their Benefit to the Dead: the Continuity of the Commemoration of the Sinful Dead, 400 - 1240
    Quidditas Volume 39 Article 5 2018 The Agency of Prayers and their Benefit ot the Dead: The Continuity of the Commemoration of the Sinful Dead, 400 - 1240 Stephanie Victoria Violette University of California, San Diego Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Violette, Stephanie Victoria (2018) "The Agency of Prayers and their Benefit ot the Dead: The Continuity of the Commemoration of the Sinful Dead, 400 - 1240," Quidditas: Vol. 39 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol39/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Quidditas 39 80 The Agency of Prayers and their Benefit to the Dead: The Continuity of the Commemoration of the Sinful Dead, 400 - 1240 Stephanie Victoria Violette University of California, San Diego According to their hagiographies, medieval saints could cure or let languish the devoted followers of their cults. Humans were at their mercy, and of course by extension at God’s mercy. For the ordinary dead, however, these roles were re- versed. In Late Antiquity, Augustine of Hippo’s De cura pro mortuis gerenda re- veals the belief that the living had the power to aid their deceased loved ones, as well as the anxieties theologians had about the place of commemoration within a Christian framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorizing Agency Susan Carle
    American University Law Review Volume 55 | Issue 2 Article 1 2005 Theorizing Agency Susan Carle Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Agency Commons, Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal History, Theory and Process Commons, and the Politics Commons Recommended Citation Carle, Susan. “Theorizing Agency.” American University Law Review 55, no.2 (December 2005): 307-387. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Theorizing Agency Abstract Progressive legal scholars today exhibit contrasting views on the scope of legal actors' agency in making "choices" about how to lead their lives. Feminist legal scholar Joan C. Williams, for example, challenges claims that women who leave the paid workforce to stay home with children have made a voluntary choice to take this path. Critical race scholar Ian Haney López, on the other hand, argues that the social construction of racial identity occurs precisely through the many voluntary choices members of both subordinated and dominant racial groups make about matters that implicate racial meanings. Williams contests the idea of voluntary choice; Haney López embraces it. These different viewpoints highlight the need for further work in legal theory on how to theorize human agency that is, the power of persons, at the individual or collective levels, to develop and achieve creative goals and to act effectively or bring about change within their the social environments in light of those goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Peirce, Pragmatism, and the Right Way of Thinking
    SANDIA REPORT SAND2011-5583 Unlimited Release Printed August 2011 Peirce, Pragmatism, and The Right Way of Thinking Philip L. Campbell Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily con- stitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • OPUS IMPERFECTUM AUGUSTINE and HIS READERS, 426-435 A.D. by MARK VESSEY on the Fifth Day Before the Kalends of September [In
    OPUS IMPERFECTUM AUGUSTINE AND HIS READERS, 426-435 A.D. BY MARK VESSEY On the fifth day before the Kalends of September [in the thirteenth consulship of the emperor 'Theodosius II and the third of Valcntinian III], departed this life the bishop Aurelius Augustinus, most excellent in all things, who at the very end of his days, amid the assaults of besieging Vandals, was replying to I the books of Julian and persevcring glorioi.islyin the defence of Christian grace.' The heroic vision of Augustine's last days was destined to a long life. Projected soon after his death in the C,hronicleof Prosper of Aquitaine, reproduccd in the legendary biographies of the Middle Ages, it has shaped the ultimate or penultimate chapter of more than one modern narrative of the saint's career.' And no wonder. There is something very compelling about the picture of the aged bishop recumbent against the double onslaught of the heretical monster Julian and an advancing Vandal army, the ex- tremity of his plight and writerly perseverance enciphering once more the unfathomable mystery of grace and the disproportion of human and divine enterprises. In the chronicles of the earthly city, the record of an opus mag- num .sed imperfectum;in the numberless annals of eternity, thc perfection of God's work in and through his servant Augustine.... As it turned out, few observers at the time were able to abide by this providential explicit and Prosper, despite his zeal for combining chronicle ' Prosper, Epitomachronicon, a. 430 (ed. Mommsen, MGH, AA 9, 473). Joseph McCabe, .SaintAugustine and His Age(London 1902) 427: "Whilst the Vandals thundered at the walls Augustine was absorbed in his great refutation of the Pelagian bishop of Lclanum, Julian." Other popular biographers prefer the penitential vision of Possidius, hita Augustini31,1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Augustine Offer Any Insight on Vocation? Megan Devore
    “The Labors of our Occupation”: Can Augustine Offer Any Insight on Vocation? Megan DeVore Megan DeVore is Associate Professor of Church History and Early Christian Studies in the Department of Theology, School of Undergraduate Studies at Colorado Christian University, Lakewood, Colorado. She earned her PhD specializing in Early Christianity from the University of Wales Trinity Saint David in the United Kingdom. Dr. DeVore is a member of the North American Patristic Society, the American Society of Church History, the Society of Biblical Literature, the Evangelical Theological Society, and the American Classical League. Around the year 401, a curious incident transpired near Roman Carthage. A cluster of nomadic long-haired monks had recently wandered into the area, causing a stir among locals. These monks took the gospel quite seriously; that is, they lived very literally one part of a gospel, “Consider the birds of the air, for they neither sow, nor reap, nor gather into barns … Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they labor not” (Matt 6:26-29). They were apparently not only shunning all physical labor on behalf of medita- tive prayer, but they were also (at least according to Augustine’s depiction of the situation) imposing such unemployment upon others, namely local barbers. In response, Augustine penned a unique pamphlet. It takes the form of a retort, but as it unfolds, a commentary on the dignity and duty of work emerges—manual labor, in itself significant, as well as “the labors of our occupation” (labores occupationem nostrarum) and “labor according to our rank and duty” (pro nostro gradu et officio laborantibus, De Op.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into a Postmodern Feminist Reading of Averroës
    Journal of Feminist Scholarship Volume 10 Issue 10 Spring 2016 Article 5 Spring 2016 Bodies and Contexts: An Investigation into a Postmodern Feminist Reading of Averroës Reed Taylor University of Arkansas at Little Rock Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Women's History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Taylor, Reed. 2018. "Bodies and Contexts: An Investigation into a Postmodern Feminist Reading of Averroës." Journal of Feminist Scholarship 10 (Spring): 48-60. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol10/ iss10/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Feminist Scholarship by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Taylor: Bodies and Contexts Bodies and Contexts: An Investigation into a Postmodern Feminist Reading of Averroës Reed Taylor, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Abstract: In this article, I contribute to the wider discourse of theorizing feminism in predominantly Muslim societies by analyzing the role of women’s political agency within the writings of the twelfth-century Islamic philosopher Averroës (Ibn Rushd, 1126–1198). I critically analyze Catarina Belo’s (2009) liberal feminist approach to political agency in Averroës by adopting a postmodern reading of Averroës’s commentary on Plato’s Republic. A postmodern feminist reading of Averroes’s political thought emphasizes contingencies and contextualization rather than employing a literal reading of the historical works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metaphysics of Agency: Avicenna and His Legacy
    The Metaphysics of Agency: Avicenna and his Legacy by Kara Richardson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Philosophy University of Toronto ©Copyright by Kara Richardson 2008 The Metaphysics of Agency: Avicenna and his Legacy Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Kara Richardson Department of Philosophy University of Toronto Abstract This dissertation begins with the Islamic philosopher Avicenna, who transforms Aristotle’s conception of the efficient cause in the Metaphysics of his Shifā’. Its first goal is to examine the arguments which constitute Avicenna’s metaphysical account of agency. Its second goal is to examine Scholastic disputes about the causal powers of natural agents that arise in connection with his view. In its final chapter, it relates Medieval debates about efficient causality to Descartes’ account of the causal powers of bodies. One of the original features of Avicenna’s account of agency is his argument for the claim that the existence of contingent things requires an efficient cause. This aspect of his view was influential in the Latin West. Avicenna also holds that the cause of the existence of contingent things is an incorporeal principle, which he describes as an agent who “bestows forms”. I argue that Avicenna fails to resolve the tension between this claim and his commitment to an Aristotelian account of generation. This failure sets the stage for Avicenna’s role in Scholastic disputes about the causal powers of natural agents in cases of generation. Both Aquinas and Suarez attribute to Avicenna the view that generation requires the creation of form.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Modern Arab-Islamic Scholarship on Ethics a Reflective Contextualization
    Introduction: Modern Arab-Islamic Scholarship on Ethics A Reflective Contextualization Mohammed Hashas and Mutaz al-Khatib The question whether there are theories in Islamic ethics1 does not differ much from the similar question whether there is an Islamic philosophy.This issue was first raised by some 18th and 19th century European Orientalists—à la Johann Jakob Brucker (1696–1770), Wilhelm Gottlieb Tennemann (1761–1819), and Ern- est Renan (1823–1892) (ʿAbd al-Rāziq [1944] 2011, 8)—and has been revisited by a number of ongoing studies, particularly since the modern edition and public- ation of various manuscripts originally written in the classical period (before the 19th century) by various Muslim and non-Muslim scholars in and from different Islamic contexts—the Arabic, Persian, Ottoman, Indian and Malay contexts—where philosophy did not die out as a discipline, as the claim has gone for some good time (El-Rouayheb and Schmidtke 2017, 1–7). A review of classical Qurʾanic exegeses shows that neither the exegets have been concerned with building theories of ethics based on the Qurʾan (al-Khaṭīb 2017), nor have Muslim scholars in general, even though the sacred text is all about ethics (Rah- man 1982, 154–155). It was the challenge of modernity that required revisiting the Islamic tradition in search of Islamic philosophy, or Arab(ic) philosophy as some prefer to call it (Ṣalībā 1989, 9–11). The avant-guardist thinkers of the so-called Arab-Islamic nahḍa (awakening or renaissance) of the 19th century, like Rifaʿa Rafiʿ al-Tahtawi (1801–1873), Jamal al-Din al-Afghani (1838–1897) and Muhammad Abduh (1849–1905), did not deal with this question of ethics as contemporary scholars do.
    [Show full text]