DOCSLIB.ORG

TNR Bob Template.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TNR Bob Template.1 36 june 27, 2005 P the new republic tails off, its murky mistakes (or sins) per- images of their common world. In the We are things thrown in the air manently inscribed in the memories of opening poem of Day by Day, however, alive in flight. all concerned. Lowell takes a stronger, if partly ironic, our rust the color of the chameleon. As Lowell finishes what will be his last view of the contribution of age to poetic book, Day by Day, he writes a valedictory strength: Living by “improvisation and in- letter to Frank Bidart, certain that he has vention,” changing styles, enthusiasms, consumed all his subject matter: This is riches: wives, girlfriends, and addresses (there the eminence not to be envied, are thirty-eight addresses—not including Now there can be no more. I can rub the account hospitals—listed in Hamilton’s appen- my hands over the bottom of the pot accumulating layer and angle, dix), Lowell endured a punishing rest- and find no more material.... I think face and profile, lessness, a terrible drivenness, that was I’ve even thrown some of the metal 50 years of snapshots, belied by his leisurely social ease, his of the pot in.And yet, nothing is ever the ladder of ripening likeness. desultory amusement, his delight in late- perfect, even within its crippling in- night talk. His enormous early zest for evitable human limitations.... I think he letters give us (with- almost anything—theology, books, wom- the ambition of art, the feeding on out biographical intervention) en, friendship, politics—gradually dimin- one’s soul, memory, mind etc. gives a “layer and angle, /face and ishes, here, under the blows of illness and mixture of glory and exhaustion. I profile” of Lowell’s mind and marital failure and the inconveniences think in the end, there is no end, the Tcharacter. They offer forty years of Low- of age.A poem by Hölderlin, called “The thread frays rather than is cut, or if it ellian snapshots—those “lurid, rapid, gar- Course of Life,” could serve as a motto is cut suddenly, it usually hurtingly ish, grouped” likenesses (as he called for the later Lowell: frays before being cut. No perfected them in “Epilogue”). The lurid and the end, but a lot of meat and drink along garish certainly are here, but the letters Upwards my soul aspired, the way. are also touching, spirited, and reflective. but soon Like the snapshots, they are “grouped”: Love drew it down; Lowell’s thread was cut suddenly, but Lowell, for all his solitariness as a writer, Suffering humbled it more; the letters are witness to how many fray- intensely required others to talk to, to So I hasten round the curve ings preceded the end.The poem approx- write to, and to love, and the letters are Of life, and return whence I began. imating the sentiments in this letter had the proof of his literary gregariousness. appeared earlier, as the final sonnet in They confirm, especially in their volatility In the letters, as in the poems, Lowell is For Lizzie and Harriet. It is called “Obit,” of erotic choice, Lowell’s Keatsian char- a more humanly attractive figure at the and begins with an acknowledgment of acterization of writers as chameleons: weary end than in the fierce beginning. J the most hurting fraying of all, the disso- lution of a long marriage: “Our love will not come back on fortune’s wheel.” The poem becomes a hymn in favor of natural David J. Garrow change over transcendence, but ends, “After loving you so much, can I forget / you for eternity, and have no other The Accidental Jurist choice?” The valedictory poems of Day by Day, published just before the poet’s death, are free-verse exhibits of the fray- Becoming Justice Blackmun: called,” the Court’s name for a gather- ing thread, as Lowell fears a depletion Harry Blackmun’s ing of the nine justices. “I walked into that can merely transcribe, not create—a Supreme Court Journey that room and there was Hugo Black, dejection phrased, of course, in as firm a By Linda Greenhouse William O. Douglas, William J. Brennan style as ever: (Times Books, 268 pp., $25) Jr., John Marshall Harlan—and I said to myself,‘What am I doing here?’ ” I am too weak to strain to remember, arry Blackmun always In the early 1970s, Blackmun was not or give remembered his very first the only person asking that question. recollection the eye of a microscope. day on the United States Justices Black, Douglas, and Potter Stew- I see Supreme Court.“I’ll never art all wondered whether the little- horse and meadow, duck and pond, forget the ninth day of known sixty-one-year-old Minnesotan universal consolatory HJune 1970, when I was sworn in,” he told could handle the tasks that confronted description without significance, a small audience in the south of France them all. Just eight years earlier those transcribed verbatim by my eye. in 1992. “Immediately after the swear- justices had watched with profound ing in we went into ‘the Conference,’ so sadness as a similarly untested Midwest- The animus of politics, the aspirations erner—Charles E. Whittaker, who had of religion, have waned, and the poet David J. Garrow is the author of Liberty joined the Court in 1957—cracked under sees himself modestly, hoping to be one and Sexuality:The Right to Privacy the emotional strain of the Court’s tough of those who have consoled their readers and the Making of Roe v. Wade (Uni- cases. Hospitalized after threatening to by transcribing into words the universal versity of California Press). commit suicide,Whittaker was pressured the new republic P june 27, 2005 37 into retiring by Chief Justice Earl War- When Blackmun’s huge collection of per- ren. Whittaker had been named to the sonal and official papers at the Library of lower federal bench, and then to the Congress was first opened in early 2004, Supreme Court, largely as a result of his five years after his death, one of the most close friendship with President Eisen- notable troves was the many deeply per- hower’s brother. sonal letters from Burger to Blackmun Harry Blackmun arrived in Washing- pre-dating 1970. ton straight from the same appeals court Linda Greenhouse, who for twenty- on which Whittaker had sat. He, too, seven years has covered the Supreme owed his appointment to that judgeship, Court for The New York Times, made and then President Nixon’s nomination the two justices’ lifelong relationship the of him to the high court, largely to one centerpiece of two front-page stories one man: Warren E. Burger, his closest friend year ago. Given advance access to the since kindergarten and, since 1969, chief Blackmun collection (along with Nina justice of the United States. Burger and Totenberg of National Public Radio), Blackmun grew up together in St. Paul Greenhouse had a two-month head start before Blackmun received a scholarship on other journalists, but the Times pub- to attend Harvard College. After law lished only a modest amount of the mate- school, also at Harvard, Blackmun re- rial that she gathered. Her new book is turned to Minnesota to clerk for a federal not a long one, nor is it based on any judge. He then joined one of the Twin additional sources beyond Blackmun’s Cities’ premier law firms, where he did papers, but it reprises in rich, thoughtful, much of his work for the Mayo Clinic in and more extensive detail the main emo- nearby Rochester. In 1949 Mayo asked tional and interpretive threads of Black- Blackmun to become its first in-house mun’s career. counsel, and Blackmun, his wife Dottie, Blackmun joined the Supreme Court and their three teenage daughters moved after a Senate Judiciary Committee hear- to small-town Rochester. ing that lasted less than four hours, de- Warren Burger earned his law degree spite the two prior nominees for that va- by attending night classes while working cancy, federal appellate judges Clement for an insurance firm in St. Paul. He then Haynsworth and G. Harrold Carswell, joined a local law firm, married (Black- having both been rejected by the Senate. mun was best man at his wedding), and Blackmun’s confirmation was unani- became active in Republican politics. mous, but repeated newspaper depictions He managed the election campaigns of of him as Burger’s “Minnesota Twin” de- Harold Stassen, the youthful three-term cisively counterbalanced the senatorial governor, and also led Stassen’s unsuc- courtesy. Blackmun’s first years on the cessful presidential candidacy in 1948. high bench underscored both his insecu- At the closely contested Republican Na- rities about whether he belonged there tional Convention in 1952, Burger proved and his pronounced conservatism. In crucial to Dwight D. Eisenhower’s first Wyman v. James, a case challenging in- ballot nomination.When Eisenhower be- trusive home visits imposed upon welfare came president, Burger was rewarded by recipients, and in United States v. Kras, being named assistant attorney general which disputed a $50 fee required of in charge of the Justice Department’s anyone filing for bankruptcy, Blackmun Civil Division. wrote majority opinions upholding the Three years later, Eisenhower ele- policies despite fervent dissents from the vated Burger to a judgeship on the U.S. Court’s liberals. Court of Appeals for the District of Co- lumbia Circuit. His judicial status not- he singular—and momen- withstanding, Burger remained in close tous—exception during Black- contact with the Justice Department, and mun’s first three years on the when the Minnesota judge for whom Court was his opinion in Roe v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Confronting Supreme Court Fact Finding Allison Orr Larsen William & Mary Law School, [email protected]
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2012 Confronting Supreme Court Fact Finding Allison Orr Larsen William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Larsen, Allison Orr, "Confronting Supreme Court Fact Finding" (2012). Faculty Publications. 1284. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1284 Copyright c 2012 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs CONFRONTING SUPREME COURT FACT FINDING Allison Orr Larsen* I. PREVALENCE OF IN-HOUSE FACT FINDING AT THE SUPREME COURT ....................................................................... 1264 A. Defining the Terms and the Quest...................................... 1264 B. How Common Is Modern In-House Fact Finding?......... 1271 II. A TAXONOMY OF IN-HOUSE FACT FINDING........................... 1277 A. What Factual Assertions Are Supported By Authorities Found “In House?”............................................................. 1278 1. Subject Matter of Facts Found In House..................... 1278 2. How Do the Justices Use In-House Factual Research? ....................................................................... 1280 B. Where Do the Sources Come From? ................................. 1286 III. WHY THE CURRENT PROCEDURAL APPROACH IS OUTDATED: RISKS OF MODERN IN-HOUSE FACT FINDING ............................................................................ 1290 A. Systematic
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Press Access
    BYU Law Review Volume 2012 Issue 6 Article 4 12-18-2012 U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Press Access RonNell Andersen Jones Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Courts Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, and the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation RonNell Andersen Jones, ��.��. �������������� ���������� ���������������� ������ ���������� ������������, 2012 BYU L. Rᴇᴠ. 1791. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. U.S. Supreme Court Justices and Press Access RonNell Andersen Jones * I. INTRODUCTION Scholars and commentators have long noted the strained relationship between the United States Supreme Court and the media that wishes to report upon its work. 1 The press corps complains that the Court is cloistered, elitist, and unbending in its traditions of isolation from the public.2 Critics regularly assert that, especially when cases of major significance to many Americans are being argued, 3 the Court * Associate Professor of Law, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University. The author thanks student researchers Brooke Nelson Edwards, Joe Orien, and Brody Wight for their assistance. I. Linda Greenhouse, Thinking About the Supreme Court After Bush v. Gore, 35 IND. L. REV. 435, 440 (2002) (calling the relationship "problematic at best"); Linda Greenhouse, Telling the Court's Story: Justice and Journalism at the Supreme Court, 105 YALE L.J. 1537, 1559 (1996) (describing the Court as "quite blithely oblivious to the needs of those who convey its work to the outside world"); Paul W.
    [Show full text]
  • Televising Supreme Court and Other Federal Court Proceedings: Legislation and Issues
    Order Code RL33706 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Televising Supreme Court and Other Federal Court Proceedings: Legislation and Issues Updated November 8, 2006 Lorraine H. Tong Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Televising Supreme Court and Other Federal Court Proceedings: Legislation and Issues Summary Over the years, some in Congress, the public, and the media have expressed interest in television or other electronic media coverage of Supreme Court and other federal court proceedings. The Supreme Court has never allowed live electronic media coverage of its proceedings, but the Court posts opinions and transcripts of oral arguments on its website. The public has access to audiotapes of the oral arguments and opinions that the Court gives to the National Archives and Records Administration. Currently, Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure prohibits the photographing or broadcasting of judicial proceedings in criminal cases in federal courts. The Judicial Conference of the United States prohibits the televising, recording, and broadcasting of district trial (civil and criminal) court proceedings. Under conference policy, each court of appeals may permit television and other electronic media coverage of its proceedings. Only two of the 13 courts of appeals, the Second and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals, have chosen to do so. Although legislation to allow camera coverage of the Supreme Court and other federal court proceedings has been introduced in the current and previous Congresses, none has been enacted. In the 109th Congress, four bills have been introduced — H.R. 2422, H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 10 2004
    Legal Writing The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute Volume 10 2004 The Golden Pen Award Third Golden Pen Award ......................................... Joseph Kimble ix Presentation of the Golden Pen Award Lessons Learned from Linda Greenhouse .... Steven J. Johansen xi Remarks – On Receiving the Golden Pen Award ......................................... Linda Greenhouse xv 2003 AALS Annual Meeting Discussion: Better Writing, Better Thinking: Introduction ...... Jo Anne Durako 3 Better Writing, Better Thinking: Thinking Like a Lawyer ....................................... Judith Wegner 9 Better Writing, Better Thinking: Using Legal Writing Pedagogy in the “Casebook” Classroom (without Grading Papers) ............................................. Mary Beth Beazley 23 Better Writing, Better Thinking: Concluding Thoughts ................................................................. Kent Syverud 83 Articles Composition, Law, and ADR .......................... Anne Ruggles Gere Lindsay Ellis 91 The Use and Effects of Student Ratings in Legal Writing Courses: A Plea for Holistic Evaluation of Teaching ................................... Judith D. Fischer 111 iii 200 4] Volume 10 Table of Contents [10 Integrating Technology: Teaching Students to Communicate in Another Medium ............ Pamela Lysaght Danielle Istl 163 Linking Technology to Pedagogy in an Online Writing Center .................................... Susan R. Dailey 181 2003 AALS Annual Meeting Panel Discussion: “The Law Professor as Legal Commentator” ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Views Expressed Are Those of the Cambridge Ma 02142
    Cover_Sp2010 3/17/2010 11:30 AM Page 1 Dædalus coming up in Dædalus: the challenges of Bruce Western, Glenn Loury, Lawrence D. Bobo, Marie Gottschalk, Dædalus mass incarceration Jonathan Simon, Robert J. Sampson, Robert Weisberg, Joan Petersilia, Nicola Lacey, Candace Kruttschnitt, Loïc Wacquant, Mark Kleiman, Jeffrey Fagan, and others Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences Spring 2010 the economy Robert M. Solow, Benjamin M. Friedman, Lucian A. Bebchuk, Luigi Zingales, Edward Glaeser, Charles Goodhart, Barry Eichengreen, of news Spring 2010: on the future Thomas Romer, Peter Temin, Jeremy Stein, Robert E. Hall, and others on the Loren Ghiglione Introduction 5 future Herbert J. Gans News & the news media in the digital age: the meaning of Gerald Early, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Glenda R. Carpio, David A. of news implications for democracy 8 minority/majority Hollinger, Jeffrey B. Ferguson, Hua Hsu, Daniel Geary, Lawrence Kathleen Hall Jamieson Are there lessons for the future of news from Jackson, Farah Grif½n, Korina Jocson, Eric Sundquist, Waldo Martin, & Jeffrey A. Gottfried the 2008 presidential campaign? 18 Werner Sollors, James Alan McPherson, Robert O’Meally, Jeffrey B. Robert H. Giles New economic models for U.S. journalism 26 Perry, Clarence Walker, Wilson Jeremiah Moses, Tommie Shelby, and others Jill Abramson Sustaining quality journalism 39 Brant Houston The future of investigative journalism 45 Donald Kennedy The future of science news 57 race, inequality Lawrence D. Bobo, William Julius Wilson, Michael Klarman, Rogers Ethan Zuckerman International reporting in the age of & culture Smith, Douglas Massey, Jennifer Hochschild, Bruce Western, Martha participatory media 66 Biondi, Roland Fryer, Cathy Cohen, James Heckman, Taeku Lee, Pap Ndiaye, Marcyliena Morgan, Richard Nisbett, Jennifer Richeson, Mitchell Stephens The case for wisdom journalism–and for journalists surrendering the pursuit Daniel Sabbagh, Alford Young, Roger Waldinger, and others of news 76 Jane B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court's Feminist Icon, Is Dead at 87
    Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court’s Feminist Icon, Is Dead at 87 By Linda Greenhouse The New York Times Sept. 18, 2020 Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court and a pioneering advocate ​ for women’s rights, who in her ninth decade became a much younger generation’s unlikely cultural icon, died on Friday at her home in Washington. She was 87. The cause was complications of metastatic pancreatic cancer, the Supreme Court said. By the time two small tumors were found in one of her lungs in December 2018, during a follow-up scan for broken ribs suffered in a recent fall, Justice Ginsburg had beaten colon cancer in 1999 and early-stage pancreatic cancer 10 years later. She received a coronary stent to clear a blocked artery in 2014. Barely five feet tall and weighing 100 pounds, Justice Ginsburg drew comments for years on her fragile appearance. But she was tough, working out regularly with a trainer, who published a book about his famous client’s challenging exercise regime. As Justice Ginsburg passed her 80th birthday and 20th anniversary on the Supreme Court bench during President Barack Obama’s second term, she shrugged off a chorus of calls for her to retire in order to give a Democratic president the chance to name her replacement. She planned to stay “as long as I can do the job full steam,” she would say, sometimes adding, “There will be a president after this one, and I’m hopeful that that president will be a fine president.” When Justice Sandra Day O’Connor retired in January 2006, Justice Ginsburg was for a time the only woman on the Supreme Court — hardly a testament to the revolution in the legal status of women that she had helped bring about in her career as a litigator and strategist.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrecting Court Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Definition of “Security”
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 62 Issue 2 Winter 2013 Article 1 2013 Resurrecting Court Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Definition of “Security” Steven J. Cleveland Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Part of the Administrative Law Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Court Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Definition of “Security”, 62 Cath. U. L. Rev. 273 (2013). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol62/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Resurrecting Court Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Definition of “Security” Cover Page Footnote Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma College of Law; J.D., Georgetown University; B.A, University of California, Los Angeles. This Article benefitted from the thoughtful comments of Donald T. Bogan, Brian M. McCall, Emily H. Meazell, Joseph T. Thai, and the participants in a roundtable discussion at the University of Oklahoma. The author is responsible for any errors. This article is available in Catholic University Law Review: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol62/iss2/1 RESURRECTING COURT DEFERENCE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION: DEFINITION OF “SECURITY” Steven J. Cleveland+ I. IMPEDIMENTS TO CHEVRON’S APPLICABILITY .......................................... 277 A. Chevron’s Applicability to an Agency’s Determination of Its Jurisdiction ...................................................... 277 B. Sufficiency of the Commission’s Political Accountability ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Frankfurter, Abstention Doctrine, and the Development of Modern Federalism: a History and Three Futures Lael Weinberger†
    ARTICLE Frankfurter, Abstention Doctrine, and the Development of Modern Federalism: A History and Three Futures Lael Weinberger† In its first century and a half, the Supreme Court never used the term “feder- alism” in its opinions. The Court had talked about federal-state relations before, but the concept had gone unlabeled. That changed in 1939. Something new was hap- pening, thanks in large part to Justice Felix Frankfurter. Just a month after joining the Court, Frankfurter authored the Court’s first opinion using the term “federal- ism.” Frankfurter introduced federalism as a key concept for analyzing the relation- ship between state courts and federal courts. Before long, Frankfurter would rely on federalism to fashion an original and enduring doctrine of judicial federalism: ab- stention, which requires federal courts to sometimes refrain from hearing cases that are within their jurisdiction. This Article provides a historical study of Frankfurter’s contribution to the modern law of judicial federalism. It documents Frankfurter’s theory of federalism in his judicial opinions with a focus on the abstention cases. It also shows how the abstention cases and their concept of federalism were rooted in Frankfurter’s Pro- gressive politics. They were a reaction to what he perceived as the federal courts’ anti-regulatory and anti-labor attitudes. The history—relevant today as the political discussion around the courts again echoes the Progressive Era—sets the stage for considering the future of abstention. I suggest three possibilities. The first, an originalist future, would more or less main- tain the contemporary Supreme Court’s status quo on abstention, somewhat more modest than what Frankfurter envisioned: a cautious use of abstention in a rela- tively small number of equitable cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Clouds in the Crystal Ball: Presidential Expectations and the Unpredictable Behavior of Supreme Court Appointees Christopher E
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals July 2015 Clouds in the Crystal Ball: Presidential Expectations and the Unpredictable Behavior of Supreme Court Appointees Christopher E. Smith Kimberly A. Beuger Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Christopher E. and Beuger, Kimberly A. (1994) "Clouds in the Crystal Ball: Presidential Expectations and the Unpredictable Behavior of Supreme Court Appointees," Akron Law Review: Vol. 27 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol27/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Smith and Beuger: Presidential Expectations CLOUDS IN THE CRYSTAL BALL: PRESIDENTAL EXPECTATIONS AND THE UNPREDICTABLE BEHAVIOR OF SUPREME COURT APPOINTEES by CHRISTOPHER E. SMITH* & KIMBERLY A. BEUGER"° INTRODUCTION When Justice Byron White announced in March of 1993 that he intended to retire at the conclusion of the Supreme Court's 1992-93 term,' he created the opportunity for President Bill Clinton to be the first Democratic president in twenty-six years to select a nominee for the high court.2 Because "[p]residents recognize that the capacity of their appointees to help shape the Court's policies is among [the presidents'] majorlegacies, ' '3 Clinton took great care in selecting a nominee.
    [Show full text]
  • Alumni News Yale Law School Alumni Have Been Gathering Around the Country
    alumni news Yale Law School alumni have been gathering around the country. Here is a sampling of the get-togethers that have taken place over the past six months. new york illinois Summer Fun with Mimi and Elliott Meisel ’71 Civil Rights Dinner Panel The Third AnnuAl YlS hamptons Summer On SepteMber 15, more than forty YlS Cocktail Party took place at the home of Mimi and alumni and their guests met at Gibson, Elliott Meisel ’71 in Sagaponack, nY on Saturday, dunn & Crutcher in new York City for a August 20. Composed of alumni, current and reception, dinner, and panel discussion. admitted students, and their guests, the hamptons Panelists Nusrat Choudhury ’06, Senior group enjoyed lovely weather and the gracious Staff Attorney, ACLU racial Justice hospitality of the Meisels. Program; Matt Alsdorf ’04, Vice President of Criminal Justice, laura and John Arnold Foundation; and Farrin Anello ’05, Visiting Assistant Clinical Professor, Center for Social Justice, Seton hall university School of law, explored the topic of “Civil rights on Offense and defense: Criminal Justice reform and immigrants’ rights.” 58 59 yale law report winter 2017 miami vineyard YLSA of Miami Event with Bill Eskridge ’78 On May 14, Miami-area alumni gathered at the home of hosts Carolina and Fred Phillips ’90 to examine and discuss the implications of the Obergefell decision. Guest speaker William Eskridge, Jr. ’78, John A. Garver Professor of Jurisprudence, Yale law School, offered insights and moderated a discussion about family law, gay rights, and religion in the aftermath of this landmark u.S. Supreme Court case.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Linda Greenhouse
    BY TIM EIGO Covering the Court On February 15, Linda Greenhouse, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter for The New York Times, spoke at Arizona State University. She was there at the invitation of the ASU School of Justice & Social Inquiry, and she presented the seventh annual John P. Frank Memorial Lecture. Her talk—“Change and Continuity on the Supreme Court—arose from research she had done in the archived papers of Supreme Court Associate Justice Harry Blackmun. That research led to a series of articles in the Times, as well as a book— Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun’s Supreme Court Journey. Earlier in the day of her lecture, Greenhouse sat down and spoke with ARIZONA ATTORNEY magazine. 18 ARIZONA ATTORNEY APRIL 2007 www.myazbar.org ARIZONA ATTORNEY: Justice Blackmun’s about Blackmun’s tardiness in circulating a estate gave you the opportunity to research dissenting opinion, and therefore holding his archived papers two months before they up Black’s circulating his majority opinion. were made public. Would you have jumped It was very sharply written, and it included at the chance if it had been offered by any Blackmun’s very wounded and defensive justice’s estate, or did you especially prize response. And I thought, “Whoa, has this the chance to peer into Justice Blackmun’s ever seen the light of day anywhere?” As far papers? as I could tell, it hadn’t. So it just kind of draws you in. LINDA GREENHOUSE: His papers were Then there was the decades of corre- reputed to be a fabulous Supreme Court spondence between Blackmun and collection, because he was known as a real [Warren] Burger.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment
    Touro Law Review Volume 14 Number 1 Article 6 1997 "The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment Burton Caine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Caine, Burton (1997) ""The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment," Touro Law Review: Vol. 14 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol14/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Caine: The Liberal Agenda "The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment Burton Caine' At a recent conference of the National Jewish Law Students Association, a student expressed surprise and appreciation that one advocating the "liberal" point of view could quote the Bible in support of that position. The implication was that "real" or "knowledgeable" Jews - often mentioned interchangeably with "Orthodox," "pious," or even "observant" Jews, are all on the right. Without even defining terms, the assumption is that these American Jews, motivated by religion and Zionism, support and become the "settlers" on the West Bank (often referred to in their Biblical nomenclature as "Judah and Samaria"), advocate government aid to Jewish religious schools and practices in the United States, and are the only real stalwarts for Jewish life at home and abroad.2 The stereotype then I Professor of Law, Temple Law School; Harvard Law School, J.D., 1952; Director, Temple-Tel Aviv Universities Law Program.
    [Show full text]