Afghan Studies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Revised Dates for the Deposition of the Begram Hoard and Occupation at the New Royal City”, Parthica, 19, 75-104
Morris, L. 2017. “Revised dates for the deposition of the Begram hoard and occupation at the New Royal City”, Parthica, 19, 75-104. REVISED DATES FOR THE DEPOSITION OF THE BEGRAM HOARD AND OCCUPATION AT THE NEW ROYAL CITY * LAUREN MORRIS ABSTRACT This paper offers two major revisions to the chronology of the archaeological site of Begram (Afghanistan). The first revision pertains to when the Begram hoard was deposited (i.e. not when the objects were produced). Based on the new identification of three coins from room 10 as belonging to the post-Vasudeva Oesho with bull series, as well as an analysis of the distribution of the hoard objects and the degradation of the surrounding structure, a terminus post quem for this event is fixed at c. 260 AD. The second revision relates to the occupation of Site II and other areas of the New Royal City. Drawing on architectural, ceramic, and numismatic evidence, it is argued that both Ghirshman’s attribution of the Site II structure to Niveau II only, and his attribution of the Qala to Niveau III, are incorrect. Rather, it seems that the Site II structure was renovated and continued to be occupied through Niveau III, and was occupied at the same time as the upper occupation layers at Site B, Site I, and the city entrance. The hoard was likely deposited with the abandonment of the New Royal City at the end of Niveau III. KEYWORDS: Begram, hoard, archives, Musée Guimet, Vasudeva imitation, Kushano- Sasanian. THE SITE, DATA, AND UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Begram is the modern name for an urban site (34°59'42"N, 69°18'39"E) ca. -
Notes on the Yuezhi - Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology”, by Hans Loeschner
“Notes on the Yuezhi - Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology”, by Hans Loeschner Notes on the Yuezhi – Kushan Relationship and Kushan Chronology By Hans Loeschner Professor Michael Fedorov provided a rejoinder1 with respect to several statements in the article2 “A new Oesho/Shiva image of Sasanian ‘Peroz’ taking power in the northern part of the Kushan empire”. In the rejoinder Michael Fedorov states: “The Chinese chronicles are quite unequivocal and explicit: Bactria was conquered by the Ta-Yüeh-chih! And it were the Ta-Yüeh-chih who split the booty between five hsi-hou or rather five Ta-Yüeh-chih tribes ruled by those hsi-hou (yabgus) who created five yabguates with capitals in Ho-mo, Shuang-mi, Hu-tsao, Po-mo, Kao-fu”. He concludes the rejoinder with words of W.W. Tarn3: “The new theory, which makes the five Yüeh- chih princes (the Kushan chief being one) five Saka princes of Bactria conquered by the Yüeh- chih, throws the plain account of the Hou Han shu overboard. The theory is one more unhappy offshoot of the elementary blunder which started the belief in a Saka conquest of Greek Bactria”.1 With respect to the ethnical allocation of the five hsi-hou Laszlo Torday provides an analysis with a result which is in contrast to the statement of Michael Fedorov: “As to the kings of K’ang- chü or Ta Yüeh-shih, those chiefs of foreign tribes who acknowledged their supremacy were described in the Han Shu as “lesser kings” or hsi-hou. … The hsi-hou (and their fellow tribespeople) were ethnically as different from the Yüeh-shih and K’ang-chü as were the hou… from the Han. -
Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art
Rienjang and Stewart (eds) Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art Edited by Wannaporn Rienjang Peter Stewart Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art Since the beginning of Gandhāran studies in the nineteenth century, chronology has been one of the most significant challenges to the understanding of Gandhāran art. Many other ancient societies, including those of Greece and Rome, have left a wealth of textual sources which have put their fundamental chronological frameworks beyond doubt. In the absence of such sources on a similar scale, even the historical eras cited on inscribed Gandhāran works of art have been hard to place. Few sculptures have such inscriptions and the majority lack any record of find-spot or even general provenance. Those known to have been found at particular sites were sometimes moved and reused in antiquity. Consequently, the provisional dates assigned to extant Gandhāran sculptures have sometimes differed by centuries, while the narrative of artistic development remains doubtful and inconsistent. Building upon the most recent, cross-disciplinary research, debate and excavation, this volume reinforces a new consensus about the chronology of Gandhāra, bringing the history of Gandhāran art into sharper focus than ever. By considering this tradition in its wider context, alongside contemporary Indian art and subsequent developments in Central Asia, the authors also open up fresh questions and problems which a new phase of research will need to address. Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art is the first publication of the Gandhāra Connections project at the University of Oxford’s Classical Art Research Centre, which has been supported by the Bagri Foundation and the Neil Kreitman Foundation. -
A Copper Hoard of the Great Kushans from Jamrud (Khyber Agency), Pakistan Gul Rahim Khan and Muhammad Naeem Qazi
Ancient Pakistan, Vol. XXV (2014) 1 A Copper Hoard of the Great Kushans from Jamrud (Khyber Agency), Pakistan Gul Rahim Khan and Muhammad Naeem Qazi Abstract: Copper hoards with small quantity of coins particularly of the Kushan period are not often appreciated for publication. But when such a parcel of coins is known from proper context then it is well praised by the scholars. Moreover, when such a collection containing coins of some interest then it is a noteworthy piece of evidence and always contributes something new to the site and history of that period. The present lot which is small but yields many things of interest like its provenance, the Buddhist site near Peshawar, and bearing two coins of the Buddha image. Keyword: Kushans, Kanishka, Huvishka, Ardoxsho, Huvishka. A small hoard of copper of the Kushan period and local people. During his visit the author got was reported to the authors about nineteen years some photographs of the site and other ago. This parcel of coins was unearthed by a antiquities but they disappeared few years back local person from a Buddhist site lying to the due to the shifting of his residence to the west of Zor Gudar, a small village at Jamrud, University campus. However, the principal Khayber Agency on the west of Peshawar. The author recently found a set of photographs along said village is located about 2.5 km to the north with hand written description of those coins west of the famous Jamrud fort and 6.0 km when they were first discovered and handed over northwest of the modern town of Hayatabad in to him for study in 1996. -
NOTES on HELLENISM in BACTRIA and INDIA. How Far Can The
NOTES ON HELLENISM IN BACTRIA AND INDIA. How far can the kingdoms in Bactria and India, ruled by kings with Greek names, be called Hellenistic, and how far were they simply native? These pages were put together with this question in view ; they have no claim to be more than an attempt to get certain problems stated, to which some day some further answer may be given by the spade. The series of these kings stretches from the levolt of Diodotos, about 250 B.C., to the final merger of Indo-Greek rule in that of the Indo-Scyths in 26 B.C. The period is bisected by the conquest of Bactria by the Yue-tche, which probably took some little while to complete, but with respect to which our information centres on the year 128 B.C. By the time of Augustus, a number of merchant- men were sailing directly from the Red Sea to India, a rare event under the Ptolemies; and this traffic increased later, when in the reign of Nero was made that discovery, or rediscovery, of the monsoons vvhicli is associated with the name of Hippalos. To arrive, therefore, at any ideas about the kingdoms of Alexander's successors beyond Parthia, it is necessary to distinguish as carefully as possible the information with regard to India, and the traces of western influence on things Indian, which can be dated later than (say) the Christian era, (and which belong rather to the history of Rome), from information which can be, or may be, dated prior to 26 B.C., or I might almost say prior to 100 B.C., (the time between these two dates being for my purpose a blank); and only to make use of the former sources when they clearly refer to something that falls within the period under consideration. -
Language and Legend in Early Kushan Coinage: Progression and Transformation Razieh Taasob Princeton University
2018, No. 5 © Samuel Jordan Center for Persian Studies and Culture, University of California, Irvine ISSN: 2470 - 4040 Language and Legend in Early Kushan Coinage: Progression and Transformation Razieh Taasob Princeton University 71 Introdu' ion: arly Kushan coinage displays its aff iliation and syncretism with former coin pra9 ices not only in the Erepresentation of royal and religious imagery, but also in the language, legends and the execution of inscriptions. The Kushans continued the traditional Greek pra9 ices that had already been adopted by the Greco-Ba9 rians, specifically the use of the Greek language on their coinage as seen frequently in Ba9 ria. In conformity with other former traditions, the Kushans also maintained the Indo-Greek prac- tices employed south of the Hindu Kush by using bilingual inscriptions on their coinage. The languages used south of the Hindu Kush were predominantly Greek for the obverse type and PrakritH (wriJ en in Brahmi and Kharoshthi script) for the reverse. The Indo-Greeks introduced the use of the Kharoshthi script for coinage, and it was subsequently applied by the Indo-Scythians and Indo-Parthians in their respe9 ive regions. This script was used in the area of the Indus, Swat, and Kabul valleys and in a wide area of northern India and the surrounding regions. Evidence of this can be seen on the coinage of the H- “The language of Indic inscription”. The Prakrit or middle Indo-Aryan (MIA) language was the only inscriptional language from the third to firQ century BC, which endured as a common language for coinage for more than two centuries. -
Mazdooano, the Gracious One, Kushan God on a Gold Dinara of Kanishka I (Coin )
Mazdooano, the gracious one, Kushan god on a gold dinara of Kanishka I (Coin ). Kushan, Kushano-Sasanian, and Kidarite Coins A Catalogue of Coins From the American Numismatic Society David Jongeward and Joe Cribb with Peter Donovan THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY NEW YORK Introduction Nearly all the , coins documented in this catalogue of the ANS collection of Kushan coins were donated to the Society: Table . Principal Sources (fve or more coins) of Kushan coins in the American Numismatic Society ANS Accession Collection No. of coins . I. J. Greenwood . Valentine collection, gif of Mr. E.T. Newell . Columbia University . Ms. R. T. Barrington . K. Minassian . Mr. E. T. Newell . Sir John Marshall, purchased from Metropolitan Museum of Art . Purchased from A. F. McKenzie . Mrs. A. M. Newell . Metropolitan Museum of Art . F. Jacobs . G.C. Miles collection, gif of Mrs. J.R. McCredie . William Spengler . Marjorie D. Schwartz . William Spengler . Martha Carter . William Spengler . William Spengler . H. W. Herz . Harry Fowler . C. K. Panish . Mrs. Olivia Garvey Lincoln . Purchased from P. R. Donovan 2 Kushan, Kushano-Sasanian, and Kidarite Coins Map . Te Kushan World. Courtesy of Elizabeth Errington. A few coins have been purchased since the outset of the present catalogue project which began in . Kushan coin donations to the ANS commenced with the I. J. Greenwood bequest in . Subsequent donations include the collections of E. T. Newell in , a jointly donated collection from William Spengler and Dr. Martha Carter in , and a large collection of Kushan coppers from the Lincoln bequest in . Dr. Larry Adams, an ANS Trustee, has kindly permitted the authors to include ffy-four gold coins from his private collection, an intended gif to the Society. -
The Kushans and the Emergence of the Early Silk Roads
The Kushans and the Emergence of the Early Silk Roads A thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Research) Departments of Archaeology and History (joint) By Paul Wilson Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Sydney 2020 This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources has been acknowledged. 1 Abstract: The Kushans and the Emergence of the Early Silk Roads The Kushans were a major historical power on the ancient Silk Roads, although their influence has been greatly overshadowed by that of China, Rome and Parthia. That the Kushans are so little known raises many questions about the empire they built and the role they played in the political and cultural dynamics of the period, particularly the emerging Silk Roads network. Despite building an empire to rival any in the ancient world, conventional accounts have often portrayed the Kushans as outsiders, and judged them merely in the context of neighbouring ‘superior’ powers. By examining the materials from a uniquely Kushan perspective, new light will be cast on this key Central Asian society, the empire they constructed and the impact they had across the region. Previous studies have tended to focus, often in isolation, on either the archaeological evidence available or the historical literary sources, whereas this thesis will combine understanding and assessments from both fields to produce a fuller, more deeply considered, profile. -
UNIT 1 the SUNGAS and KUSHANAS* the Sungas and Kushanas
UNIT 1 THE SUNGAS AND KUSHANAS* The Sungas and Kushanas Structure 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 The Emerging Significance of North-West India 1.3 Sources 1.4 The Sungas 1.4.1 Territorial Control of the Sungas 1.4.2 Administrative Structure 1.4.3 Sunga Art 1.5 The Indo-Greeks 1.6 Indo-Scythians and Indo-Parthians 1.7 The Kushanas 1.7.1 Early Days 1.7.2 Territorial Expansion 1.7.3 Successors of Kanishka 1.7.4 Religious Policy of the Kushanas 1.7.5 Dynastic Sanctuaries of the Kushanas 1.8 New Elements in Indian Society 1.9 Non-Monarchical Powers 1.10 Summary 1.11 Key Words 1.12 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 1.13 Suggested Readings 1.0 OBJECTIVES After reading this Unit, you will be able to learn about: political events in India from the close of the Mauryan period to about 300 CE; the assimilation of diverse foreign elements into the mainstream of Indian society; and the religious leanings of the rulers who came to control the north-west and north India between 200 BCE to 300 CE. 1.1 INTRODUCTION The collapse of the Mauryan rule in 187 BCE paved the way for the emergence of several powers in the Indian subcontinent. The period from the decline of the Mauryas to the rise of the Guptas (2nd century BCE to 3rd century CE) is known in Indian history as the post- Mauryan period. * Professor Suchandra Ghosh, Department of History, University of Calcutta, Kolkata. -
Achievements of Kushanas Significance of the Kushana Empire
Origins Kushanas are considered to be one of the five branches of the Yuezhi tribe who lived in the Chinese frontier or central Asia. They are known as Guishuang in Chinese sources. They eventually acquired dominance over the other Yuezhi tribes. They moved eastward towards India defeating the Parthians and the Sakas in the 1st century AD. Kujula Kadphises (Reign: AD 30-AD 80) or Kadphises I Kujula Kadphises was the first Yuezhi chief to lay the foundation of the Kushana Empire in India. He established his supremacy over Kabul, Kandahar and Afghanistan. He was succeeded by his son Vima Taktu or Sadashkana (AD 80 -AD 95) who expanded the empire into northwest India. Vima Kadphises (Reign: AD 95-AD 127) An inscription found at Rabatak in Afghanistan mentions that he was the son of Vima Taktu and the father of Kanishka. He has issued a large number of gold coins. He was a Shiva devotee as is clear from coins issued by him. A large number of Roman gold coins found from this era indicates the prosperity of India at that time and also the growing trade with the Romans. Kanishka (Reign: 127 AD – 151 AD) Considered the greatest Kushana king and also a great king of ancient India. Son of Vima Kadphises. His kingdom included Afghanistan, parts of Sindhu, parts of Parthia, Punjab, Kashmir, parts of Magadha (including Pataliputra), Malwa, Benaras, perhaps parts of Bengal, Khotan, Kashgar, Yarkhand (last three in modern China). His empire covered Gandhara, Peshawar, Oudh, Pataliputra, Kashmir and Mathura. His kingdom also included parts of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. -
5 the Kidarite Kingdom in Central Asia
ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 Origin and rise of the Kidarites 5 THE KIDARITE KINGDOM IN CENTRAL ASIA* E. V. Zeimal Contents Origin and rise of the Kidarites ............................. 123 Early history of the Kidarites .............................. 124 Foundation of the Kidarite state ............................. 125 Kidara’s conquest of Gandhara and Kashmir ...................... 126 The decline of the Kidarites ............................... 127 The new conquest of Bactria by the Sasanians (467) .................. 129 Economy, society and polity .............................. 130 Monetary system and trade ............................... 132 Life-style, culture and ideology ............................. 136 Origin and rise of the Kidarites The fourth century witnessed the appearance in Central Asia of a new wave of nomadic tribes known by a variety of names and recorded in numerous sources. By the Latin authors they were called Chionites, and by the Greek authors Kidarite Huns or ‘Huns who are Kidarites’; in Indian chronicles they were known as Huna, in Armenian literature as both Honk’ and Kushans, and in the Chinese annals as the Ta Yüeh-chih, or Lesser Yüeh-chih (i.e. the same name that denoted their forerunners in those lands, who founded the Kushan Empire). Their ruler was called Kidara or Chi-to-lo (Ancient Chinese, kjie-tâ-lâ). The use * See Map 3. 123 ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 Early history of the Kidarites of different names sometimes makes it difficult to evaluate the information provided by the written sources1 and to reconstruct a general historical picture. An important prerequisite is to make a clear distinction between the Kidarites and another tribal group known as the Hephthalites (Hua, I-ta, Hep’tal, Tetal, Hephtal, Abdel and Hayatila in the sources; see also Chapter 6).2 The terms Huns and Chionites seem to reflect the general ethnic appellation of this people,3 whereas Kidarites should be understood as a dynastic designation derived from the name of their king, Kidara. -
Deities on Kushana Coins
Deities on Kushana Coins Kushana coinage is famous for their varied and vast devices, especially on reverse side. The reverse of the Kushana coins depicted a multitude of deities, borrowed from different religions. It is possible that these divinities reflect the religious beliefs of the Kushana rulers as well as those of the people whom they subdued. Kuzul Kadphises coins bear Greek gods like Herakles and Zeus. From the time of Vima Kadphises the different forms of Shiva become prominent and He is depicted on the coins of all Imperial Kushanas rulers. Gods and goddesses of Iranian pantheon dominate the coins of Kanishka and Huvishka. Addition of more Indian deities are also noticeable, like Buddha, Shakyamuni Buddha, Maitreya and Amitabha on the coin of Kanishka I, and the presentation of Skanda-Kumara, Mahasena, Vishakha, besides Uma and probably Ganesha on coins is credited to Huvishka. An interesting coin of Vasudeva I shows four-armed figure of lord Vasudeva. Though number and variety of the deities are restricted from the time of Vasudeva I. Vasudeva I and his successors depict on their coins only the image of Shiva and Ardoksho. The deities show on reverse of the coins of Imperial Kushana, bring together gods and goddesses belonging to different pantheon as worshipped and revered in those ages in Greece, Rome, Bactria and India. Names of these deities are easily known from the label written near the figure in Greek characters. The following list help in understanding the deities of the Imperial Kushana coinage. I. Hellenistic and Roman Deities 1. Elios = Sun god 2.