abstract The 'Sefat Emet' Commentaries on the

Yosef Marcus

Rabbi Yehudah Aryeh Leib Alter (the 'Sefat Emet') was one of the most prominent Hassidic in Poland before World War I. His Hasidic philosophy, which was published in the book 'Sefat Emet on the ', has become very central in the Hasidic world. Various scholars have characterized its philosophy as coherent, clear, without debates, tensions or dilemmas. Over the years, his commentaries on the Talmud, which he wrote while studying, for his own use, not for public distribution, were also published, became famous and were printed in several editions. This research seeks to analyze the methodology of his Talmudic interpretation and to point out that he frequently used 'critical' tools in his commentary: independent interpretations that opposed the views of the ''; drawing a distinction between the original statements of the 'Amora'im' and the Talmud's additions to them; suggestions for amending the Talmudic text; a new interpretation of the Mishnah that contradicts the interpretation of the Talmud; and more. The Sefat Emet’s methodology is unique in Eastern European rabbinics, and it reveals critical and independent thought. Ostensibly, this approach contradicts his Hassidic philosophy, which is considered moderate and conservative. Indeed, as shown by Yoram Jacobson, in his philosophy, we can distinguish between his public speeches gathered in the book 'Sefat Emet on the Torah' and the texts that he wrote for his own use before he became a . The latter texts reveal a stormy and independent person. This analysis of the Sefat Emet’s ways of interpreting the Talmud, upholds this distinction.

Oqimta 6 (2020). Full article at: http://www.oqimta.org.il/oqimta/2020/marcus6.pdf