The Shoalhaven Chronograph with Berry Newsletter August/September 2016
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne – Aikenhead Wing Proposed demolition Referral report and Heritage Impact Statement 27 & 31 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy July 2021 Prepared by Prepared for St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Quality Assurance Register The following quality assurance register documents the development and issue of this report prepared by Lovell Chen Pty Ltd in accordance with our quality management system. Project no. Issue no. Description Issue date Approval 8256.03 1 Draft for review 24 June 2021 PL/MK 8256.03 2 Final Referral Report and HIS 1 July 2021 PL Referencing Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced as endnotes or footnotes and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify and acknowledge material from the relevant copyright owners. Moral Rights Lovell Chen Pty Ltd asserts its Moral right in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. Lovell Chen’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Limitation Lovell Chen grants the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty- free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral rights of Lovell Chen or third parties. This report is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Lovell Chen Pty Ltd and its Client. Lovell Chen Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. -
The Architecture of Scientific Sydney
Journal and Proceedings of The Royal Society of New South Wales Volume 118 Parts 3 and 4 [Issued March, 1986] pp.181-193 Return to CONTENTS The Architecture of Scientific Sydney Joan Kerr [Paper given at the “Scientific Sydney” Seminar on 18 May, 1985, at History House, Macquarie St., Sydney.] A special building for pure science in Sydney certainly preceded any building for the arts – or even for religious worship – if we allow that Lieutenant William Dawes‟ observatory erected in 1788, a special building and that its purpose was pure science.[1] As might be expected, being erected in the first year of European settlement it was not a particularly impressive edifice. It was made of wood and canvas and consisted of an octagonal quadrant room with a white conical canvas revolving roof nailed to poles containing a shutter for Dawes‟ telescope. The adjacent wooden building, which served as accommodation for Dawes when he stayed there overnight to make evening observations, was used to store the rest of the instruments. It also had a shutter in the roof. A tent-observatory was a common portable building for eighteenth century scientific travellers; indeed, the English portable observatory Dawes was known to have used at Rio on the First Fleet voyage that brought him to Sydney was probably cannibalised for this primitive pioneer structure. The location of Dawes‟ observatory on the firm rock bed at the northern end of Sydney Cove was more impressive. It is now called Dawes Point after our pioneer scientist, but Dawes himself more properly called it „Point Maskelyne‟, after the Astronomer Royal. -
Spring 2013 by DESIGN Sydney’S Planning Future
spring 2013 BY DESIGN Sydney’s planning future REVIEW Reflections on Public Sydney: Drawing The City DRAWING ATTENTION The language of architecture DESIGN PARRAMATTA Reinvigorating public places In the public interest Documenting, drawing and designing a city 7. Editor Laura Wise [email protected] Editorial Committee Chair Contents Shaun Carter [email protected] President’s message Editorial Committee 02 Noni Boyd [email protected] Callantha Brigham [email protected] 03 Chapter news Matthew Chan [email protected] Art direction and design 12. Opinion: Diversity - A building block for Jamie Carroll and Ersen Sen innovation Dr Joanne Jakovich and Anita leadinghand.com.au 06 Morandini Copy Editor Monique Pasilow Managing Editor Our biggest building project Joe Agius Roslyn Irons 07 Advertising [email protected] Subscriptions (annual) Review: Reflections on Public Sydney Andrew Five issues $60, students $40 12 Burns, Rachel Neeson and Ken Maher [email protected] Editorial & advertising office Tusculum, 3 Manning Street Drawing the public’s attention: The Language of Potts Point NSW 2011 (02) 9246 4055 20. 16 architecture Adrian Chan, David Drinkwater and ISSN 0729 08714 Aaron Murray Published five times a year, Architecture Bulletin is the journal of the Australian Institute of Architects, James Barnet: A path through his city NSW Chapter (ACN 000 023 012). 18 Dr Peter Kohane Continuously published since 1944. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in articles and letters published in From the Government Architect: Architecture Bulletin are the personal 19 views and opinions of the authors of Non-autonomous architecture Peter Poulet these writings and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the Institute and its officers. -
AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016
AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours. -
Paolo Giorza and Music at Sydney's 1879 International Exhibition
‘Pleasure of a High Order:’ Paolo Giorza and Music at Sydney’s 1879 International Exhibition Roslyn Maguire As Sydney’s mighty Exhibition building took shape, looking to the harbour from an elevated site above the Botanic Gardens, anxiety and excitement mounted. This was to be the first International Exhibition held outside Europe or America and musical entertainment was to be its greatest attraction.1 An average of three thousand people would attend each week day and as recent studies have shown, Sydney’s International Exhibition helped initiate reforms to education, town planning, technologies, photography, manufacturing and patronage of the arts, music and literature.2 Although under construction since January 1879, it was mid May before the Exhibition’s influential Executive Commissioner Patrick Jennings3 announced the appointment of his friend, Milanese composer Paolo Giorza4 as musical director: [H]is credentials are of such a nature both as a conductor, composer and artist, that I could not justly pass them over. I think that he should also be authorised to compose a march and cantata for the opening ceremony … Signor Giorza offers to give his exclusive services as composer and director and performer on the organ and to organise a competent orchestra of local artists for promenade concerts, and to conduct the same.5 The extent of Jennings’s personal interest in Exhibition music is evident in this report publicising Giorza’s appointment. It amounts to one of the colony’s most interesting cultural documents for the ideas, attitudes and objectives it reveals, including consideration of whether an ‘Australian School of Music, as distinguished from any of the well-defined schools’ existed. -
Conservation Management Framework For
MOSMAN POLICE STATION CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK 09.1322 PREPARED FOR: MOSMAN COUNCIL AND NSW POLICE Architectural Projects Pty Ltd . Architects Studio 1, The Foundry, 181 Lawson Street, Darlington, NSW 2008 Ph: +61 (0) 2 9319 1122 Fax: +61 (0) 2 9319 1128 Email: [email protected] 23 December 2009 Version No 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................7 1.1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................................7 1.2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................................7 1.3 AUTHORSHIP.....................................................................................................................................................7 1.4 LIMITATIONS .....................................................................................................................................................7 1.5 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................................7 1.6 TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS.....................................................................................................................7 -
AIA REGISTER Jan 2015
AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REGISTER OF SIGNIFICANT ARCHITECTURE IN NSW BY SUBURB Firm Design or Project Architect Circa or Start Date Finish Date major DEM Building [demolished items noted] No Address Suburb LGA Register Decade Date alterations Number [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1910 Caledonia Hotel 110 Aberdare Street Aberdare Cessnock 4702398 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1905 Denman Hotel 143 Cessnock Road Abermain Cessnock 4702399 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1906 St Johns Anglican Church 13 Stoke Street Adaminaby Snowy River 4700508 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adaminaby Bowling Club Snowy Mountains Highway Adaminaby Snowy River 4700509 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1920 Royal Hotel Camplbell Street corner Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701604 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1936 Adelong Hotel (Town Group) 67 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701605 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adelonia Theatre (Town Group) 84 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701606 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Adelong Post Office (Town Group) 80 Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701607 [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Golden Reef Motel Tumut Street Adelong Tumut 4701725 PHILIP COX RICHARDSON & TAYLOR PHILIP COX and DON HARRINGTON 1972 Akuna Bay Marina Liberator General San Martin Drive, Ku-ring-gai Akuna Bay Warringah -
International Exhibitions, Expositions Universelles and World's Fairs, 1851-2005: a Bibliography
Freie Universität Berlin, Germany California State University, Fresno, USA International Exhibitions, Expositions Universelles and World’s Fairs, 1851-2005: A Bibliography by Alexander C.T. Geppert, Jean Coffey and Tammy Lau 1. Introduction _________________________________________________________ 5 2. Research Aids ______________________________________________________ 7 2.1 Research Aids General _________________________________________________7 2.2 Bibliographies ________________________________________________________8 2.3 Review Articles ______________________________________________________10 2.4 Journals and Newsletters ______________________________________________10 3. History and Theory of International Exhibitions: General Works _______________ 11 3.1 Official Exhibition Regulations ___________________________________________11 3.2 Exhibition Theory _____________________________________________________11 3.3 Exhibition History _____________________________________________________13 4. International Exhibitions, 1851-2005 ____________________________________ 28 4.1 Australia ____________________________________________________________28 4.1.0 Australia Genera l _____________________________________________28 4.1.1 International Exhibition, Sydney 1879-1880 _________________________28 4.1.2 International Exhibition, Melbourne 1880-1881 ______________________28 4.1.3 Centennial International Exhibition, Melbourne 1888-1889 _____________28 4.1.4 Expo 88, Brisbane 1988 ________________________________________28 4.2 Austria _____________________________________________________________28 -
With City W Alking T
WITH CITY WALKING TOUR ‘This is IMPACTFUL ARCHITECTURE, BOTH FUNCTIONAL AND INSPIRATIONAL, providing a greater public good than just the sum of individual buildings.’ – Peter Poulet, 23rd NSW Government Architect, 2016 FOREWORD For 200 years New South Wales weaving together plans, images wrote despairingly that has been shaped by the ideas and other items, applying his he hoped soon ‘there will and imaginings of a unique group inimitable knowledge of this state’s be a new Government of architects. The legacy of their architectural and social history. Architect and may be a service as government architects It is a story and an exhibition new and less “pigheaded” lies in the design and realisation that touches us all. It is hard to Principal Librarian’. of many thousands of buildings. imagine our towns, our cities and In addition to the Not all survive; not all were our lives without the ubiquitous Government Architect and even built, existing today only public buildings created by our his staff, we acknowledge in description or perhaps in government architects. It is a story the support of a number plans. Yet as today’s Government that touches us as we walk our of our partner cultural institutions Architect, Peter Poulet, comments, streets, visit towns, go to school, which have generously lent items, their legacy is architecture with attend court, seek medical aid, read in particular, State Records NSW, enormous impact that amounts in a library. the Museum of Applied Arts to far more than the sum of the It is fitting to hold this exhibition & Sciences, the National Archives individual buildings, an impact that in the State Library as our buildings of Australia, the Australian Institute continues in our cities and towns. -
Glebe Society Bulletin 2015 Issue 04
Issue 4 of 2015 (June) ISSN 1836-599X UranGrowths Bays Preint consultation – should we be worried? From Lesley Lynch, Convenor, Bays & Foreshores: UrbanGrowth NSW held a marathon consultation – The puli good in suh a huge the Sydneysiders Summit and related forums – urban development cannot be over five days (14-18 May) on the ‘transformation’ of the Bays Precinct. The general public was protected by the good intentions invited to drop in over the weekend. More specialist of some officials. It requires groups were invited to separate forums: councils strong formal planning on Thursday evening, community stakeholders/leaders on Friday evening and principles guaranteeing industry (planners, architects etc) on Monday. We transparency, strong planning are not quite sure when the big end of town and major developers were invited! laws protecting the public good and politial will The Glebe Society took UrbanGrowth’s invitation to this consultation seriously and with our ever- optimistic good faith. We paid for 3,000 leaflets There was a veritable cornucopia of information: advertising the Summit locally, held a well-attended the professional, glossy Discussion Paper, public meeting to discuss the Summit and fascinating information displays and videos, reminded all members just before the Summit. The repeated short talks on ideas for ‘transforming’ the Glebe Society was consequently well-represented bays’ and helpful UrbanGrowth staff at every among the many interested Sydneysiders who display. This information flow was interspersed with dropped in to see what UrbanGrowth had to say. constant exhortations to tell UrbanGrowth what you An enjoyable weekend experience … think: through short Q&A sessions, sticky note boards, electronic gadgets, a video room, talking The Summit was a friendly, interesting and tables and intimate and informal chats with the enjoyable experience in a fabulous venue (the UrbanGrowth staff – including the CEO and senior refurbished Locomotive Hall of the Australian staff. -
Music As Triumph at Australia's International Exhibitions, 1879–1888
‘Turning the Wilderness into Flowers:’ Music as Triumph at Australia’s International Exhibitions, 1879–1888 Jennifer Royle In 1872, travel writer and English novelist Anthony Trollope recorded in his notes how struck he was by the grandeur and dimensions of Melbourne, which he believed possessed ‘all the pride of youthful power.’ According to Trollope, so compelled were Melbourne residents to tell him the story of their city that the writer became overwhelmed by their enthusiasm, or as he put it, their fondness for the colonial art of ‘blowing:’ They ‘blow’ a good deal in Queensland;—a good deal in South Australia. They blow even in poor Tasmania. They blow loudly in New South Wales, and very loudly in New Zealand. But the blast of the trumpet as heard in Victoria is louder than all the blasts,—and the Melbourne blast beats all the other blowing of that proud colony. My first, my constant, my parting advice to my Australian cousins is contained in two words—‘Don’t Blow.’1 While Trollope was, I suspect, prone to more than a little exaggeration, the essence of his comments, that Australians enjoyed telling the story of colonial progress, was never more justified than in the years of Australia’s International Exhibitions held between 1879 and 1888. Australia had already shown a steady commitment to the competitive and educative principals of the International Exhibition, having participated in most of the world exhibitions since 1851. Indeed, the objectives outlined in 1851 by Prince Albert that the International Exhibition would provide ‘a new starting point from which all nations will be able to direct their further exertions,’ seems to have been particularly attractive to colonial countries trying to establish themselves in world markets.2 From 1851 the Australian colonies sent representatives and products for display to major overseas exhibitions including London (1862, 1871), Paris (1855, 1867), Vienna (1873) and Philadelphia in 1876. -
Another Two Diagonal Avenues Intersect the Site, Radiating from the Central Section of the Gardens on Carlton Street, to the Two Southern Entry Points
ROYAL EXHIBITION BUILDING AND CARLTON GARDENS Another two diagonal avenues intersect the site, radiating from the central section of the gardens on Carlton Street, to the two southern entry points. The avenue on the east side is planted with Plane trees (Platanus x acerifolia). Near the Works Depot, in the avenue’s most northern extent, the trees are planted at wide spacings. This may have been a realisation of John Guilfoyle’s 1916 proposal to remove every second plane tree from the South Garden Plane Tree Avenue. It is unclear when the removal was to take place. The plane tree avenue referred to may have been that in the North Garden and not the one in the South Garden. In the southern section the trees are closely spaced, forming a denser over canopy and providing a stronger sense of enclosure. The avenue on the opposite diagonal on the west side of the gardens is planted with Grey Poplars (Populus x canescens) also reaching senescence. A replanting on the south-west side of this avenue with poplars occurred in 2006. The avenue’s integrity is strongest near Carlton Street where the trees are regularly spaced and provide good canopy coverage. 4.4.5 North Garden Boundary Trees The layout of the North Garden in the 1890s was primarily based on extensive avenue plantings crossing the site, with little in the way of other ornamentation. Individual specimen trees were mainly planted around the perimeter of the site, forming loose boundary plantations. The spaces between the avenue plantations remained relatively free of in-fill plantings, with expanses of turf being the primary surface treatment in these areas.