DOCSLIB.ORG

October 1990 HOUSTON GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY BULLETIN Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

October, 1990 BULLETIN 1 HOUSTON GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY t 7 dume 33 rmber 2 CHECK OUT THE CARBONATE FIELD TRIP! Seepage12 GCAGS CONVENTION See pages 8 & 40 HGS SHRIMP PEEL See page 32 IN THIS ISSUEoo. - Deep Oil Prospects in Trinidad .................................. Page 16 - RCRA: A Historical Perspective ................................. Page 22 - Re-evaluating the Potential of Old Plays ........................ Page 25 - Energy and Destiny: We Must Control Both ..................... Page 29 - Chainsaws and Computers ..................................... Page 42 PL US MORE! (For October Events, see page 1 and Geoevents section, page 33) E rom mne-wem to Atlas Wireline Services I Founded in 1932 as Lane-Wells Co., Atlas 0 Wlreline conveyance servioes - br extended- Wiline Services is now a division of Western reach, horizontal, and difficult-to-service Atlas International, offuing comprehensive wells wireline services worldwide. We've continually tl Global services - a single service from one enhanced our capabilities to offer the latest in location in 1932 to over 100 services from digital data acquisition, analysis, and compietion 80 worldwide locations services for every stage in the life of a well: -. -. Openhole senices - pipe recovery to CBILm 7 ATLAB (Circumferential Borehole Imaging Log) WIREUNE Westam Atlam 0 Cased hde services - perforating to pulsed b'iteirnational P.O. Box 1407 neutron logging Houston. Texas 77251-1407 Produdion 0 bgg@ scnices-injection Open Hole Sewices (713) 972-5739 operations to geothermal services Cased Hole Services (7 13) 972-5766 7he Atlas Advmtage HGS OCTOBER EVENTS MEETINGS OCTOBER 8,1990 (Dinner Meeting) "Evaluation of Untested Stratigraphic Traps in a Pleistocene Canyon-Fill Complex, Offshore Louisiana" Jim Geitgey (see page 10) Westin Oaks Hotel, 5011 Westheimer Social Period 5:30 p.m., Dinner and Meeting 6:30 p.m. Reservations made by name only, telephone 785-6402. Must be made or cancelled by noon Friday, October 5. OCTOBER 10, 1990 (Business Meeting) HGS ENVIRONMENTAL/ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTS "The Proposed Commercial Hazardous Waste Incinera- tion Facility Located in Jacintoport Industrial Park in East Harris County Along the Houston Ship Channel" (see page 20) Kay Crouch Charlie's Hamburger Joint, 2222 Ella Blvd., about 1/4 mile south of the 610 Loop. 6:00p.m. (Buyyour own dinner) OCTOBER 16, 1990 (Dinner Meeting) HGS PERMIAN BASIN/MID-CONTINENT EXPLORATIONISTS "Geology of the Cottonwood Creek Field, Carter County, Oklahoma" Michael Roberts (see page 24) Westin Oaks Hotel, 5011 Westheimer Dinner and Meeting 5:30 p.m. HGS Explorers "On Top of Ole Smoky," Clingman's Reservations made by name only, telephone 785-6402. Must Dome (see story on page 35). be made or cancelled by noon Monday, October 15. OCTOBER 17, 1990 (Dinner Meeting) HGS INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATIONISTS "Rift Basins of Chad" Gerard J. Genik (see page 14) Westin Oaks Hotel, 5011 Westheimer Social Period 5:30 p.m., Dinner and Meeting 6:30 p.m. Reservations by name only, telephone 785-6402. Must be made or cancelled by noon Monday, October 15. OCTOBER 31,1990 (Luncheon Meeting) "Eustatic and Salt-Tectonic Controls on Sequence Development, Northern East Texas Basin" . Ken Ehman (see page 10) Houston Club, 811 Rusk Social Period 11:30 a.m., Lunch and Meeting 12:00 noon. Reservations made by name only, telephone 785-6402. Must be made or cancelled by noon Monday, October 29. SEMINARS, COURSES, AND ENTERTAINMENT OCTOBER 12, 1990 (Entertainment) HGS SHRIMP PEEL Knights of Columbus Hall, 607 East Whitney 5:30 p.m. (see page 32) OCTOBER 22-25, 1990 HGS FIELD TRIP "Holocene Carbonates of The South Florida Keys" (see page 12 for more information) OCTOBER 27,1990 (Education) HGS SHORT COURSE "Trap Analysis of Faults" Urban S. Allen (see page 37 for more information) Shell Oil Training Center, 3837 Bellaire Blvd. 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Explorers break up day hike with a swim in Abrams Creek near Cades Cove, Tenn. Houston Geological Society Bulletin. October 1990 HOUSTON GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY BULLETIN Vol. 33, No. 2 October, 1990 BULLETIN COMMITTEE CONTENTS EDITOR: George E. Kronrnan, 556.4452 Amoco Production Co. MANAGING Jo Ann Locklin. 954-6262 DEPARTMENTS EDITORS: Texaco Sue van Gelder, 466-3348 President's Comments ................................... 7 Consult~ngGeologist Society Meetings ASSOCIATE EDITORS: Evaluation of Untested Stratigraphic Traps in a Business Louis Bertoli, 968-6821 Pacific Enterprises Oil Co. Pleistocene Canyon-Fill Complex, Southwestern Louisiana, Computer Mark W. Hodson, 629-6600 JimGeitgey .............................................. 10 Marathon Editorial Mary Jo Klosterman, 973-3112 Eustatic and Salt-Tectonic Controls on Sequence Exxon lnternatlonal Development, Northern East Texas Basin, Ken Ehman ............lo Mindy Kronman, 531.7424 Rice University Rift Basins of Chad, Gerard J. Genik ...........................14 Donna Davis, 961-0141X374 P.I. Exploration Systems Proposed Commercial Hazardous Waste Incineration Larry Levy, 728-0008 Facility Located in Jacintoport Industrial Park in LSL Resources J. Todd Stephenson, 556-2929 East Harris County Along the Houston Ship Channel Amoco Product~onCo. KayCrouch ..............................................20 Janet B. Thornburg, 589-2640 Geologist Geology of the Cottonwood Creek Field, Environmental Glenn R. Lowenstein, 460-4015 Carter County, Oklahoma, Michael Roberts .....................24 Geologist Events David C. Callaway, 584-3445 Arco Oil & Gas International Explorationists. ............................ .14 Sandi Barber, 623-8000 XI545 Unocal On The Move ........................................... .15 Donna Fouch.Flores, 531-5135 Lou~s~anaLand & Explor. Co Environmental/Engineering Geologists ................... .20 Exploration B~llElsenhardt, 774-6669 Permian BasinIMid-Continent Explorationists ............ .24 Review Consulting Geologist International Hugh Hay-Roe. 358.5871 Geo-Events and Calendar ............................... .33 Consultant Committee News. ....................................... .34 Planning Bruce L. Grethen, 940-4053 Sonat Exploration Co. AAPG Delegate Corner ................................. .38 John Hefner, 468-9495 Consulting Geolog~st GCAGS News .......................................... .40 Technical William H. Roberts, 465-2228 Trader's Column ........................................ .45 Articles Hydrexco Company Nelson C. Steenland, 666-0266 Houston Geological Auxiliary. ........................... .46 Geophys~cist Manuscripts, inquiries, or suggestions should be New Members .......................................... .49 directed to Editor, c/o HGS Bulletin, 7171 Harwin, Suite 314, Houston, TX 77036. Deadline for copy is six weeks Exploration Activity Review ............................. .50 prior to publication. All copy must be typewritten and double-spaced on standard white paper. Line drawings and other illustrations must be photo-ready. If prepared PRICE SCHEDULE- RESERVATIONS POLICY on a word processor, please send a copy of the computer Reservations are made by calling the HGS office disc, preferably in e~therPagemaker or Ventura format. OCTOBER MEETINGS (785-6402). At the meeting, names are checked against Photographs submitted for publication are welcome, (Non-members: $2.00 to meal price) the reservation list. Those with reservations will be sold but cannot be returned. add the HGS Dinner Meeting tlckets ~mmed~ately.Those without reservations will be asked to wait for available seats, and a $2 ADVERTISING COMMITTEE Westin Oaks Hotel, Oct. 8.. ....... $20.00 surcharge will be added to the price of the ticket. All Please call Permian BasinIMid-Continent who do not honor their reservations will be billed 785-2885 Explorationists for the price of the meal. If a reservation cannot be for information about advertising. Dinner Meeting kept, please cancel or send someone in your place. Westin Oaks Hotel, Oct. 16.. ...... $20.00 International Explorationists Dinner Meeting Westin Oaks Hotel, Oct. 17.. ...... $20.00 located at 7171 Harwin, Suite 314, Houston, HGS Luncheon Meeting Texas 77036. The telephone number is (713) 785-6402. Houston Club, Oct. 31 ............ $15.00 Houston Geolog~calSoclety Bullet~n,October 1990 Page 16 International Brief Deep Oil Prospects in Trinidad, Suhas C. Talukdar, Wallace G. Dow, and Krishna M. Persad 22 Environmental Review RCRA: A Historical Perspective, U.S. Ojfice of Solid Waste 25 Business of Geology Re-evaluating the Potential of Old Plays, Richard Nehring 29 Opinion Energy and Destiny: We Must Control Both, Michel T. Halbouty 42 Digital Digest Chainsaws and Computers: Parables on the Appropriate Use of Tools, Mark W. Hodson 44 Feature Article "Holographic" Science To Meet Energy Needs, Richard F. Tucker COVER PHOTO Pleistocene coral from a quarry in San Salvador is shown in the photograph. Similar fossils will be viewed on the "Holocene Carbonates of South Florida" HGS field trip on October 22-25. See page 12 for more information. - CORRECTIONS In the September Bulletin, the caption on page 1 should have read: Underwater photograph of the reef crest at Grecian Rocks, one of the outer platform-margin reefs which will be visited during the HGS Carbonate Field Trip to Florida this month. The reef crest is dominated by the large massive branching moosehorn coral, Acropora palmata. The water level over this layer is only one foot. On page 13, Gene Trowbridge's name was inadvertently left off the bottom left photo. I FUTURE HGS MEETINGS AND EVENTS (November) NOVEMBER 10, 1990 (HGS Field
Recommended publications
  • Salt Caverns &Their Use for Disposal of Oil Field Wastes

    Salt Caverns &Their Use for Disposal of Oil Field Wastes

    An Introduction to Salt Caverns & Their Use for Disposal of Oil Field Wastes An Introduction to Salt Caverns & Their Use for Disposal of Oil Field Wastes Table of Contents What Are Salt Caverns? ........................................................................................... 2 Why Are Salt Caverns Important? ............................................................................ 2 Where Are Salt Deposits and Caverns Found? ......................................................... 3 How Are Caverns Formed?...................................................................................... 4 How Are Caverns Used? .......................................................................................... 5 What Types of Wastes Are Considered to Be Oil Field Wastes? ......................................................................... 6 What Are the Legal Requirements Governing Disposal of Oil Field Wastes into Salt Caverns? ....................................... 7 Are NOW or NORM Wastes Currently Being Disposed of into Caverns?.............................................................. 8 How Are Wastes Put into Caverns? .......................................................................... 9 What Types of Monitoring Are Appropriate for Disposal Caverns?........................................................................ 10 What Happens to the Cavern When It Is Full? ........................................................ 11 What Would Happen if Caverns Leak? ..................................................................
  • Halronmicreditapplication.Pdf

    Halronmicreditapplication.Pdf

    CONTINUING GUARANTY FOR VALUE RECEIVED, and to induce HALRON LUBRICANTS INC. of Green Bay, Wisconsin (“Halron”) to extend credit to (“Debtor”), the Insert Company Name Here undersigned (“Guarantor”, whether one or more) jointly and severally guarantee payment to Halron when due or, to the extent not prohibited by law, at the time Debtor becomes the subject of bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings, all debts, obligations and liabilities of every kind and description, arising out of the credit granted by Halron to Debtor (the “Obligations”), and to the extent not prohibited by law, all costs, expenses and fees at any time paid or incurred in endeavoring to collect all or part of the Obligations or to realize upon this Guaranty. This includes, but is not limited to any collection fee, legal proceeding and/or reasonable attorney’s fees. No claim which Guarantor may have against a co-guarantor of any of the Obligations or against Debtor shall be enforced nor any payment accepted until the Obligations are finally paid in full. To the extent not prohibited by law, this Guaranty is valid and enforceable against Guarantor even though any Obligation is invalid and unenforceable against Debtor. To the extent not prohibited by law, Guarantor expressly waives notice of the acceptance, the creation of any present or future Obligation, default under any Obligation, proceedings to collect from Debtor or anyone else, and all diligence of collection and presentment, demand, notice and protest. This is a continuing Guaranty and shall remain in full force and effect until Halron receives written notice of its revocation signed by Guarantor or actual notice of the death of Guarantor.
  • Rouseville Refinery Plant 1

    Rouseville Refinery Plant 1

    Environmental Covenant When recorded, return to: GOC Property Holdings, LLC, 175 Main Street, Oil City, PA 16301 GRANTOR: GOC Property Holdings, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: 55 Main Street, Rouseville, PA 16344 ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT This Environmental Covenant is executed pursuant to the Pennsylvania Uniform Environmental Covenants Act, Act No. 68 of2007, 27 Pa. C.S. §§ 6501-6517 (UECA). This Environmental Covenant subjects the Property identified in Paragraph 1 to the activity and/or use limitations in this document. As indicated later in this document, this Environmental Covenant has been approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (Department). 1. Property affected. The property affected (Property) by this Environmental Covenant is located in the Borough ofRouseville, Venango County. The postal street address of the Property is: 55 Main Street, Rouseville, PA. The County Parcel Identification No. of the Property is: 25-03-01 C and 25-03-01D. The latitude and longitude of the center of the Property affected by this Environmental Covenant is: 41 degrees - 28 minutes - 0.69 seconds (north) and 79 degrees - 41 minutes - 31.45 seconds (west). The property has been known by the following name: Rouseville Refinery Plant 1. The Primary Facility (PF) No. of the Rouseville Refinery Plant 1 is: 612975. The Tank Facility ID No. ofthe Rouseville Refinery Plant 1 is: 61-91604. A complete description of the Property is attached to this Environmental Covenant as Exhibit. A. A map of the Property is attached to this Environmental Covenant as Exhibit B. 2. Property Owner I GRANTOR. GOC Property Holdings, LLC, ("GOC") is the Owner of the Property and "GRANTOR" of this Environmental Covenant.
  • Bureau of Economic Geology

    Bureau of Economic Geology

    BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN W. L. FISHER, DIRECTOR PHASE III: EXAMINATION OF TEXAS SALT DOMES AS POTENTIAL SITES FOR PERMANENT STORAGE . OF TOXIC CHEMICAL WASTE Prepared by S. J. Seni, E. W. Collins, H. S. Hamlin, W. F. Mullican Ill, and D. A. Smith Assisted by L. Falconer and T. Walter Report prepared for the Texas Water Commission under Interagency Contract No. IAC(84-85)-2203 Bureau of Economic Geology W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin University Station, Box X Austin, Texas 78713 November 1985 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. 1 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS, by S. J. Seni • 1 REFERENCES 5 TOPICAL SUMMARIES OF RESEARCH REPORTS, by S. J. Seni 7 Subsidence and Collapse 7 Structural Patterns Around Texas Salt Domes 9 Cap Rock. 10 Cap-Rock Hydrology 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. 15 RESEARCH REPORTS* 17 Subsidence over Texas Salt Domes, by W. F. Mullican III 18 Statistical Analysis of Structure in the Houston Diapir Province, by W. F. Mullican III . 73 Petrography and Structure of Cap Rock with Emphasis on Core from Boling Salt Dome, Texas, by S. J. Seni . · 114 Geology and Hydrogeology, Barbers Hill Salt Dome, Texas, by H. S. Hamlin . · 181 Hydraulics of Cap Rock, Barbers Hill Salt Dome, Texas, by D. A. Smith • 236 Review of the Geology and Plio-Pleistocene to Post-Pleistocene Deformation at Damon Mound Salt Dome, Texas, by E. C. Collins. 275 APPENDIX A. List of domes and codes . 308 * All figures, tables, and references are listed within individual research reports. i i INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of final Phase III research in order to better quantify selected issues associated with permanent storage of toxic chemical wastes in solution­ mined caverns in salt.
  • HGS Bulletin Volume 35 No.9 (May 1993)

    HGS Bulletin Volume 35 No.9 (May 1993)

    May 1993 BULLETIN Volume 35 Number 9 THE GREAT $10.00 "EXPERIMENTAL" EVENING MEETING (See Ad, Page 8, and Meeting Survey, Page 9) * * * HGS JOBS HOTLINE (713)785-9729 * * * IN THIS ISSUE... - South Australia - The southern continental margin.. ........... Page 12 - Can I eat the seafood? .......................................... Page 18 - Estimating reservoir size from seismic .......................... Page 22 - Micromagnetics ................................................ Page 24 - Another party heard from.. ..................................... Page 31 - New happenings at the Houston Museum of Natural Science ..... Page 34 - A collector's guide to vintage oil & gas books ..................... Page 36 - Selecting "The Right" workstation .............................. Page 44 AND MORE! See Centerfold for May Calendar and Geoevents. Non-Exclusive 2D/3D .. , ,\.! , HOUSTON GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 7171 Harwin. Suite 31 4 Houston. Texas 77036-2190 (713) 785-6402 Fax: (713) 785-0553 Office Hours: 7 a.m. .4 p.m. - EXECUTIVE BOARD - President ....................................................................Patrick T . (Pat) Gordon. Consultant President-Elect ...........................................................John M . Biancardi. Vicksburg Production Vice President .........................................................Dwight (Clint) Moore. Anadarko Petroleum Secretary ........................................................... .Jeannie Fisher Mallick. Excalibur Consultina Treasurer .................................................................
  • Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. V. Miller Oil & Gas Operations

    Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. V. Miller Oil & Gas Operations

    Case: 13-20558 Document: 00512945125 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 13-20558 FILED February 23, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce PENNZOIL-QUAKER STATE COMPANY Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. MILLER OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS; WILLIAM J. MILLER; MILLER OIL & GAS OPERATIONS, LIMITED; METRON MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.; WILLIAM CYLVESTOR WILLIAMS, JR.; BILL LINCOLN, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: The holder of a trademark has certain rights, among them the power to prohibit another entity from using its mark without its consent. Those rights are subject to equitable defenses, including acquiescence, where the markholder affirmatively represents to another that it may use its mark, who then relies on that representation to its prejudice. This case requires us to clarify the role that undue prejudice plays in the analysis of acquiescence. Concluding that the defendant here failed to demonstrate that it was unduly prejudiced by any representations made by the markholder, we reverse. Case: 13-20558 Document: 00512945125 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2015 No. 13-20558 I. This is a dispute about a commercial relationship, one largely defined by the use of another’s intellectual property, gone bad. Pennzoil-Quaker State Company (“Pennzoil”), makes and sells automotive lubricants, including motor oil. As part of its business, Pennzoil owns several federally recognized trademarks and trade dress,1 notably the name “Pennzoil,” the “Pennzoil Across the Bell” logo, and a color scheme involving the use of yellow with black accents.
  • THE. PALESTINE SALT DOME, ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS. By

    THE. PALESTINE SALT DOME, ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS. By

    THE. PALESTINE SALT DOME, ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS. By OLIVER B. HOPKINS. INTRODUCTION. The Palestine salt dome has been known for many years, having been described briefly by Penrose* in 1890 and by Dumble 2 in 1891. The dome was recognized through the occurrence of salt, which was obtained here in small quantities prior to 1890. The production of salt lapsed for many years, but recently the industry has been re­ vived- and a modern plant producing a large quantity of salt of vari­ ous grades has been established. There are no conspicuous indica­ tions of oil or gas here, and so far no deep test wells for oil have been put down. The discovery of tarry oil in a deep well on the Keechi dome, 6 miles north of the Palestine dome, has stimulated interest in the oil possibilities of the' domes of this area and has led to the leas­ ing of the- lands on and around them. The writer spent one week' in October, 1916, in studying the geology of this dome and the surrounding area. He wishes to offer grateful acknowledgment to Judge O. C. Funderburk, of Palestine, for assistance in the field, and to Mr. A. L. Bowers, president of the Palestine Salt & Coal Co., for information relating to the drilling of salt wells. L. W. Stephenson, of the Geological Survey, studied the Cretaceous fossils from the area, and to him the writer is indebted for much of the information concerning the age of the formations present. LOCATION. The Palestine salt dome is in Anderson County, eastern Texas, 6 miles south of west of Palestine.
  • Win at Daytona Page 3

    Win at Daytona Page 3

    ALUMNIPUBLISHED FOR SHELL ALUMNI IN THE AMERICAS | WWW.SHELL.US/ALUMNINEWSJUNE 2015 UNLOCKING SHELL MAKES HISTORY SHELL IN THE ARCTIC ENERGY ON NEW YORK STOCK IN ULTRA- EXCHANGE Answers to commonly DEEPWATER asked questions. Shell Midstream Partners 3D printing saves goes public. months of work. WIN AT DAYTONA PAGE 3 20154305 ComPgs.indd 1 5/13/15 5:20 AM 2 SHELL NEWS ALUMNINEWS AlumniNews is published for Shell US and Canada. Editors: Design: Natalie Mazey and Jackie Panera Production Centre of Excellence Shell Communications The Hague Writer/copy editor: Shell Human Resources: Susan Diemont-Conwell Annette Chavez Torma Communications and Alicia Gomez A WORD FROM OUR EDITORS We know that many of you as former Shell GO GREEN employees field questions from time to time Sign up to receive the newsletter electronically by on Shell projects and the direction of the visiting www.shell.us/alumni. While you’re there, read industry. While our goal is to provide you the latest news and information about Shell. Thank you to those who have already chosen to go green! with news about the business, some alumni expressed a need for messaging documents that would help explain Shell’s stance on CONTENTS particular hot-button issues. This issue, we’ve sought to answer commonly asked questions about our role in the Arctic. We hope this information will prove helpful when HIGHLIGHTS discussing the project with friends and family. Shell technology under the hood 03 Joey Logano wins his first-ever Daytona 500. Also in this issue, we’ve shared a major success at the Daytona 500—a big win for Unlocking energy in ultra-deepwater driver Joey Logano and for Shell as 04 3D printing saves months of work.
  • D:\Documents and Settings\Ghales\My Documents

    D:\Documents and Settings\Ghales\My Documents

    ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER TO AID PUBLIC COMMENT In the Matter of Shell Oil Company and Pennzoil-Quaker State Company File No. 021 0123, Docket No. C-4059 I. Introduction The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission” or “FTC”) has issued a complaint (“Complaint”) alleging that the proposed merger of Shell Oil Company (“Shell”) and Pennzoil- Quaker State Company (“Pennzoil”) (collectively “Respondents”) would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and has entered into an agreement containing consent orders (“Agreement Containing Consent Orders”) pursuant to which Respondents agree to be bound by a proposed consent order that requires divestiture of certain assets (“Proposed Consent Order”) and a hold separate order that requires Respondents to hold separate and maintain certain assets pending divestiture (“Hold Separate Order”). The Proposed Consent Order remedies the likely anticompetitive effects arising from Respondents’ proposed merger, as alleged in the Complaint, and the Hold Separate Order preserves competition pending divestiture. II. Description of the Parties and the Transaction Shell Oil Company, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is the United States operating entity for the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies (collectively referred to as “Shell”). Shell is engaged in virtually all aspects of the energy business, including exploration, production, refining, transportation, distribution, and marketing. As part of the relief ordered by the Commission in Chevron/Texaco, Docket C-4023 (Jan. 2, 2002), Texaco divested its interest in Equilon Enterprises LLC to Shell and its interest in Motiva Enterprises LLC to Shell and Saudi Refining Company.
  • Fuentes V. Royal Dutch Shell PLC Et

    Fuentes V. Royal Dutch Shell PLC Et

    Case 2:18-cv-05174-AB Document 1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VICTOR FUENTES, individually Civil Action No.: ( %- S- J7 'f and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Complaint -- Class Action Plaintiff, Jury Trial Demanded v. / ROY AL DUTCH SHELL PLC, SHELL OIL COMPANY, PENNZOIL-QUAKER STATE COMP ANY and JIFFY LUBE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. INTRODUCTION I. Average hourly pay at Jiffy Lube shops in the United States ranges from approximately $8.14 per hour for an Entry Level Technician to $16. 88 per hour for an lnspector. 1 In contrast, the United States' "living wage"-the ··approximate income needed to meet a family's basic needs"-is $15.12. ~ 2. Likely contributing to this wage gap, according to a study by two Princeton economists, are no-poach provisions in franchise agreements which 1 https://www .indeed.com/cmp/Jiffy-Lube/salaries 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), http://bit.ly/20P0QvY. -1- Case 2:18-cv-05174-AB Document 1 Filed 11/29/18 Page 2 of 32 prohibit one shop owner from offering work to employees of another shop owner. 3 Jiffy Lube-which has more than 2,000 shops across the country­ imposed such a no-poach clause in both of its standard franchise agreements. 4 Owners of a Jiffy Lube franchise, for example, cannot hire anyone who works or has worked at another Jiffy Lube within the previous six months. One of the Princeton study' s authors explains that these no-poach provisions can "significantly influence pay" by obviating the need for franchise owners to compete for the best workers.
  • PENNZOIL V. TEXACO 77

    PENNZOIL V. TEXACO 77

    1988] PENNZOIL v. TEXACO 77 PENNZOIL v. TEXACO MARK G. YUDOF AND JOHN L. JEFFERS* This paper disrnsses the Pe1111:oilI'. Texaco litigatio11,ll'hich pmc/11,·eclthe /argt'sl cfril judgment. $/0.53 billion U.S., 011dthe larg<'Stcivil settlement. $3 billion U.S .. in American history. It describes the facts of the case. provides an 0\'£'1Tiell'of the Am<·rirnnh·gal pri11ciplesres11c•cti11g contractformatio11 011d tortious ime1fere11cell'ith cotlfract. and considers some of the policy issues arising therefrom. I. THE FACTS Perhaps it would be useful to begin with some of the background to this well­ publicized controversy and to identify some decisional points and their legal and policy implications. We rely on the facts as they were developed in the Trial Court and stated by the Texas Court of Appeals. On December 21, 1983, Pennzoil commenced a tender offer of$ I 00 a share for up to 16 million shares or 20% of the stock of Getty Oil Company. The stock was then selling for about $80 per share. At that time, the Sarah C. Getty Trust owned 40.2% of the Getty stock, with Gordon Getty as the sole trustee, and the J. Paul Getty Museum, of which Harold Williams was the President, owned 11.8% of the shares. Thus, Getty presented the rather atypical situation in which two men controlled the majority of the shares of a large and publicly-traded oil company, and were they so inclined, could have sold a controlling interest in the company without the approval of the Getty Board of Directors.
  • Salt Tectonics Topics

    Salt Tectonics Topics

    Salt Tectonics Topics Salt Deposition Salt Movement Diapir Structures Imaging Link to faulting Composition of Salt Domes Salt Deposition Restricted marine basins Mostly halite Minor traces of gypsum or anhydrite Often the two are interbedded and folded Bonneville Salt Flats, Utah Gypsum, Ca(SO ).2H 0 4 2 Halite, NaCl Salt moves driven by buoyancy Sequential Stages of a Salt Diapir •Salt density= 2 g/ cm3 •Salt undergoes no compaction •Mechanically weak - viscous •Shale Density is initially 40% water •Initial Density = 1.8 g/ cm3 •Water expelled during compaction • Final Density = 2.4 g/ cm3 Salt at the Surface Salt Structures -Iran Salt Glacier - Iran Gulf of Gulf of Mexico Mexico Salt Variety of Salt Structures Internal flow of salt Jackson et al. 1990 Detection of Salt Domes Gravity Gravity surveys • Find gravity lows • Low density Seismic Imaging GM-SYS™ Profile model of salt structure integrating seismic reflection, FTG gravity, and magnetic data (EarthExplorer, 2009). Seismic Image of a Salt Dome Geosoft GmsYs-3D model of a salt body embedded in a 3D density volume (Earth Explorer, 2009)_ 3D Seismic Interpretation of Salt Sandbox Experiment Relationship between salt dome and normal faulting Structures http://www.beg.utexas.edu/indassoc/agl/animations/AGL95-MM-001/index.html GUGLIELMO, G., Jr., , B. C. VENDEVILLE, D. D. SCHULTZ-ELA, and M. P. A. JACKSON Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, Extension Above Salt Diapir Salt Structures vs. Tectonic Structures •Caused by movement of salt, not by plate