Win at Daytona Page 3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dodge Motorsports NSCS Race Advance Autism Speaks 400 Dover International Speedway Sunday, May 16, 2010
Contact: Matthew Simmons Adam Saal Dodge Motorsports Notes & Quotes - NSCS Race Advance - Dover International Speedway May 10, 2010, DOVER, Del. - For Immediate Release Dodge Motorsports NSCS Race Advance Autism Speaks 400 Dover International Speedway Sunday, May 16, 2010 www.media.chrysler.com www.twitter.com/teamdodge DODGE AT DOVER INTERNATIONAL SPEEDWAY • Dodge has five wins at Dover: Richard Petty (2), Ryan Newman (3). • Richard Petty gave Dodge its first Dover victory at the Delaware 500 – in 1974. He led 491 of the 500 laps. • Dodge has started from the pole at Dover seven of the last 13 times qualifying has taken place. The pole winners were Newman (4), Jeremy Mayfield (2) and Rusty Wallace (1). • Dodge’s Kurt Busch is one of only three drivers to have scored top-five finishes at both Dover races last year (Jimmie Johnson and Matt Kenseth). THE DODGE BOYS • Dodge has 206 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series victories. • Dodge’s most recent win came at Atlanta Motor Speedway. Kurt Busch led 129 laps en route to victory in the Kobalt Tools 500. • Dodge claimed four Sprint Cup Series victories in 2009. • Dodge teams have posted 46 wins since the manufacturer’s return to NASCAR’s premier series in 2001 after being out of the sport since 1977. • Dodge has posted wins each season since it’s return in 2001 including seven wins twice (2002 and 2006). DOVER NUGGETS • Kurt Busch made his NASCAR Sprint Cup debut at Dover in 2000. He started 10th and finished 18th in the fall event. He also competed in the Craftsman Truck Series event that weekend, posting a victory in his only start in a truck at ‘The Monster Mile’. -
Shell" Transport and Trading Company, Ltd
THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY May 21, 1955 The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company, Ltd. Greater Operational Activity Results in Increased Sales Volume Heavy Capital Expenditure Inescapable Substantially Enlarged World Consumption Sir Frederick Godber's views on Oil Prices HE Annual General Meeting of through the capitalization of part of ber, was widely appreciated and T The " Shell " Transport and the company's share premiums re favourably commented upon, as Trading Company, Limited, will be serve. affording an opportunity of following held on June 1 at The Chartered In more closely the current trading When commenting on this issue surance Institute, 20, Aldermanbury, results of the group. I am glad to in my statement last year, I said that say that this year we propose to London, E.C. one of its objects was to broaden the publish similar results on a quarterly The following is the statement by basis of the ownership of the com basis, and that figures for the first the Chairman, Sir Frederick Godber, pany. You may, therefore, be inter quarter will be available within a few which has been circulated with the ested to learn that during 1954 re weeks. report and accounts for the year end gistered Ordinary stockholders in ed December 31, 1954: — creased by approximately 10,000, and I will now proceed to the report in December numbered over 142,000. on the group financial results for The Board of Directors You will appreciate, of course, that 1954. Little more than a year after his the number of individuals who own THE ROYAL DUTCH/SHELL resignation from the board owing to the equity of the company must ill health, Sir Andrew Agnew, our exceed this figure by a substantial GROUP REPORT ON THE colleague for so many years, has margin, there being no record of those YEAR 1934 passed away. -
7-Eleven & Shell
MARCUS & MILLICHAP OFFERING MEMORANDUM Activity#Z0380619 7 - ELEVEN & SHELL 8541 WEST FREEWAY FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76116 OFFERING MEMORANDUM | 7 - ELEVEN & SHELL 8541 WEST FREEWAY, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76116 INVESTMENT OVERVIEW INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS • Irreplaceable Off-Ramp Location • Absolute NNN Lease with Zero Landlord Responsibilities • Income Tax Free State • Corner Location with Dedicated Turn Lane • Large Pylon Sign with Freeway Visibility • 80,523 People in Three Mile Radius • 106,194 Vehicles Per Day on Interstate 30 • 7-Eleven is the World’s Largest Operator, Franchisor & Licensor of INVESTMENT SUMMARY Convenient Stores The Conway Group at Marcus & Millichap is pleased to present th • Fort Worth is the 4 Most Populous Metropolitan Area in the the sale of this 3,042 square foot 7-Eleven and Shell property in United States Fort Worth, Texas. The subject property operates as a NNN Lease, with zero landlord responsibilities. This convenient store sits on 0.74 acres of and, with filling stations present. Situated on a signalized OFFERING SUMMARY corner, with a dedicated turn lane and pylon signage, the subject property sees over 106,194 Vehicles Per Day on Interstate PRICE $1,974,000 30. Located in a Tax Free State, this 7-Eleven offers great visibility and easy access. NOI $101,640 th C A P R A T E 5.15 % Fort Worth is the 15 -Largest City in the United States, with a population of 875,000 people. Population growth is up 8.50 PRICE/SF $648.92 percent in a one mile radius from the property. RENT/SF $33.41 7-Eleven was founded in 1927 and has now grown and evolved L E A S E T Y P E NNN into an international chain of convenience stores, operating nearly 7,800 company-owned and franchised stores in North GROSS LEASABLE AREA 3,042 SF America. -
Halronmicreditapplication.Pdf
CONTINUING GUARANTY FOR VALUE RECEIVED, and to induce HALRON LUBRICANTS INC. of Green Bay, Wisconsin (“Halron”) to extend credit to (“Debtor”), the Insert Company Name Here undersigned (“Guarantor”, whether one or more) jointly and severally guarantee payment to Halron when due or, to the extent not prohibited by law, at the time Debtor becomes the subject of bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings, all debts, obligations and liabilities of every kind and description, arising out of the credit granted by Halron to Debtor (the “Obligations”), and to the extent not prohibited by law, all costs, expenses and fees at any time paid or incurred in endeavoring to collect all or part of the Obligations or to realize upon this Guaranty. This includes, but is not limited to any collection fee, legal proceeding and/or reasonable attorney’s fees. No claim which Guarantor may have against a co-guarantor of any of the Obligations or against Debtor shall be enforced nor any payment accepted until the Obligations are finally paid in full. To the extent not prohibited by law, this Guaranty is valid and enforceable against Guarantor even though any Obligation is invalid and unenforceable against Debtor. To the extent not prohibited by law, Guarantor expressly waives notice of the acceptance, the creation of any present or future Obligation, default under any Obligation, proceedings to collect from Debtor or anyone else, and all diligence of collection and presentment, demand, notice and protest. This is a continuing Guaranty and shall remain in full force and effect until Halron receives written notice of its revocation signed by Guarantor or actual notice of the death of Guarantor. -
Shell QRA Q2 2021
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC 2ND QUARTER 2021 AND HALF YEAR UNAUDITED RESULTS SUMMARY OF UNAUDITED RESULTS Quarters $ million Half year Q2 2021 Q1 2021 Q2 2020 %¹ Reference 2021 2020 % 3,428 5,660 (18,131) -39 Income/(loss) attributable to shareholders 9,087 (18,155) +150 2,634 4,345 (18,377) -39 CCS earnings attributable to shareholders Note 2 6,980 (15,620) +145 5,534 3,234 638 +71 Adjusted Earnings² A 8,768 3,498 +151 13,507 11,490 8,491 Adjusted EBITDA (CCS basis) A 24,997 20,031 12,617 8,294 2,563 +52 Cash flow from operating activities 20,910 17,415 +20 (2,946) (590) (2,320) Cash flow from investing activities (3,535) (5,039) 9,671 7,704 243 Free cash flow G 17,375 12,376 4,383 3,974 3,617 Cash capital expenditure C 8,357 8,587 8,470 9,436 8,423 -10 Operating expenses F 17,905 17,042 +5 8,505 8,724 7,504 -3 Underlying operating expenses F 17,228 16,105 +7 3.2% (4.7)% (2.9)% ROACE (Net income basis) D 3.2% (2.9)% ROACE on an Adjusted Earnings plus Non- 4.9% 3.0% 5.3% controlling interest (NCI) basis D 4.9% 5.3% 65,735 71,252 77,843 Net debt E 65,735 77,843 27.7% 29.9% 32.7% Gearing E 27.7% 32.7% Total production available for sale (thousand 3,254 3,489 3,379 -7 boe/d) 3,371 3,549 -5 0.44 0.73 (2.33) -40 Basic earnings per share ($) 1.17 (2.33) +150 0.71 0.42 0.08 +69 Adjusted Earnings per share ($) B 1.13 0.45 +151 0.24 0.1735 0.16 +38 Dividend per share ($) 0.4135 0.32 +29 1. -
Rouseville Refinery Plant 1
Environmental Covenant When recorded, return to: GOC Property Holdings, LLC, 175 Main Street, Oil City, PA 16301 GRANTOR: GOC Property Holdings, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: 55 Main Street, Rouseville, PA 16344 ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT This Environmental Covenant is executed pursuant to the Pennsylvania Uniform Environmental Covenants Act, Act No. 68 of2007, 27 Pa. C.S. §§ 6501-6517 (UECA). This Environmental Covenant subjects the Property identified in Paragraph 1 to the activity and/or use limitations in this document. As indicated later in this document, this Environmental Covenant has been approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (Department). 1. Property affected. The property affected (Property) by this Environmental Covenant is located in the Borough ofRouseville, Venango County. The postal street address of the Property is: 55 Main Street, Rouseville, PA. The County Parcel Identification No. of the Property is: 25-03-01 C and 25-03-01D. The latitude and longitude of the center of the Property affected by this Environmental Covenant is: 41 degrees - 28 minutes - 0.69 seconds (north) and 79 degrees - 41 minutes - 31.45 seconds (west). The property has been known by the following name: Rouseville Refinery Plant 1. The Primary Facility (PF) No. of the Rouseville Refinery Plant 1 is: 612975. The Tank Facility ID No. ofthe Rouseville Refinery Plant 1 is: 61-91604. A complete description of the Property is attached to this Environmental Covenant as Exhibit. A. A map of the Property is attached to this Environmental Covenant as Exhibit B. 2. Property Owner I GRANTOR. GOC Property Holdings, LLC, ("GOC") is the Owner of the Property and "GRANTOR" of this Environmental Covenant. -
Royal Dutch Shell Report on Payments to Governments for the Year 2018
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL REPORT ON PAYMENTS TO GOVERNMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2018 This Report provides a consolidated overview of the payments to governments made by Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiary undertakings (hereinafter refer to as “Shell”) for the year 2018 as required under the UK’s Report on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014 (as amended in December 2015). These UK Regulations enact domestic rules in line with Directive 2013/34/EU (the EU Accounting Directive (2013)) and apply to large UK incorporated companies like Shell that are involved in the exploration, prospection, discovery, development and extraction of minerals, oil, natural gas deposits or other materials. This Report is also filed with the National Storage Mechanism (http://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/nsm) intended to satisfy the requirements of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom This Report is available for download from www.shell.com/payments BASIS FOR PREPARATION - REPORT ON PAYMENTS TO GOVERNMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2018 Legislation This Report is prepared in accordance with The Reports on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014 as enacted in the UK in December 2014 and as amended in December 2015. Reporting entities This Report includes payments to governments made by Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiary undertakings (Shell). Payments made by entities over which Shell has joint control are excluded from this Report. Activities Payments made by Shell to governments arising from activities involving the exploration, prospection, discovery, development and extraction of minerals, oil and natural gas deposits or other materials (extractive activities) are disclosed in this Report. -
Quest Opens Page 4 2 Shell News
ALUMNIPUBLISHED FOR SHELL ALUMNI IN THE AMERICAS | WWW.SHELL.US/ALUMNINEWSMARCH 2016 ULTIMATE JOURNEY TO THE DEEP WATER MAKES ENERGY LAST FRONTIER HEADLINES IN EFFICIENCY MARS-URSA BASIN Shell alumnus takes the trip Shell Eco-marathon of a lifetime. Shell announces Americas returns 100 million boe discovery to Detroit. at Kaikias field. QUEST OPENS PAGE 4 2 SHELL NEWS ALUMNINEWS AlumniNews is published for Shell US and Canada. Editors: Design: Heather Pray Russell and Jackie Panera Production Centre of Excellence Shell Communications Calgary Writer/copy editor: Shell Human Resources: Susan Diemont-Conwell Annette Chavez Torma Communications and Alicia Gomez A WORD FROM OUR EDITORS GO GREEN! A company that is simpler, more focused and U.S. AlumniNews moving to a digital more competitive. That’s the aim of a recent version starting December 2016 global structure change introduced by CEO Beginning with our December 2016 issue, Ben van Beurden and implemented at the AlumniNews will be delivered in an start of 2016. Along with the evolved global electronic format and will no longer be structure come projects that exemplify Shell’s offered as a printed and mailed publication. continued innovation and willingness to lead CONTENTS We invite our U.S. subscribers to sign up the industry. online at www.shell.us/alumni or by email This issue of AlumniNews features articles on at [email protected]. We will notify the company’s support of Alberta’s climate you directly when the latest version of change proposal and the historic opening of AlumniNews is posted online each quarter. Quest, a carbon capture and storage project designed to capture more than 1 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO²) each year. -
Helping Hands Paper Reported Wednesday
PIRATES ON THE RUN A SMELLY MESS Marshfield runners stand out at Tugman, B1 What is killing fish in Hawaii? A6 Serving Oregon’s South Coast Since 1878 THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 theworldlink.com I 75¢ County changes Bandon spray area BY AMY MOSS STRONG berry growers and conflicting information In addition, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife don’t want this, there isn’t any benefit to The World about whether the insecticide Dibrome Service plans to develop an Integrated Marsh doing it.” would prevent farmers from selling their Management Plan this fall. Commissioners A show of hands indicated about one- BANDON — A plan to conduct aerial crop due to chemical residue. passed a motion Wednesday to encourage fourth of those in attendance were in favor of spraying to kill mosquitoes in and around the “(The question is) would we be solving USFWS to stick to their commitment to spraying, with the majority opposed. Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge was one economic problem to cause another,” monitor mosquito populations and treat Fears ranged from the effects of Dibrome derailed Monday night after a crowd of Cribbins said Wednesday. refuge lands, if necessary, until the restora- on humans and animals to whether it is an Bandon residents, including local cranberry The plan now, according to Coos County tion is completed. approved insecticide for the cranberry crop, growers, bee keepers and organic gardeners, Public Health Director Nikki Zogg, is to Monday night a crowd of more than 200 soon to be harvested by Bandon growers. pleaded with the Coos County Board of apply a granular form of the larvicide people gathered at the Sprague Theater with “I’m not against spraying, but I want to Commissioners to reconsider. -
The Evolution of the Royal Dutch Shell: a Conversation with Marvin Odum, President of Shell Oil Company
Penn Sustainability Review Volume 1 Issue 8 Environmental Politics Article 2 5-5-2016 The Evolution of the Royal Dutch Shell: A Conversation with Marvin Odum, President of Shell Oil Company Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/psr Part of the Environmental Studies Commons Recommended Citation (2016) "The Evolution of the Royal Dutch Shell: A Conversation with Marvin Odum, President of Shell Oil Company," Penn Sustainability Review: Vol. 1 : Iss. 8 , Article 2. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/psr/vol1/iss8/2 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/psr/vol1/iss8/2 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Evolution of the Royal Dutch Shell: A Conversation with Marvin Odum, President of Shell Oil Company This journal article is available in Penn Sustainability Review: https://repository.upenn.edu/psr/vol1/iss8/2 THE EVOLUTION OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL A CONVERSATION WITH MARVIN ODUM PRESIDENT OF SHELL OIL COMPANY 6 THE EVOLUTION OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL A CONVERSATION WITH MARVIN ODUM PRESIDENT OF SHELL OIL COMPANY 7 The following are excerpts from our interview. OIL IN THE ENERGY Note: Shortly following this interview, Odum TRANSITION: THE retired from Royal Dutch Shell. EVOLUTION OF Sasha Klebnikov: Shell is a company that has ROYAL DUTCH SHELL a lot of different aspects to it. How would you describe it? Is it an energy company? An oil Penn Sustainability Review’s editor-in-chief, company? A gas company? An engineering Sasha Klebnikov, recently had the honor of company? sitting down with the former president of Shell Oil Company, Marvin Odum, to talk about the Marvin Odum: Shell is an energy company, but future of energy, the push for a price on car- also a company that’s always looking forward. -
Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. V. Miller Oil & Gas Operations
Case: 13-20558 Document: 00512945125 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 13-20558 FILED February 23, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce PENNZOIL-QUAKER STATE COMPANY Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. MILLER OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS; WILLIAM J. MILLER; MILLER OIL & GAS OPERATIONS, LIMITED; METRON MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.; WILLIAM CYLVESTOR WILLIAMS, JR.; BILL LINCOLN, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: The holder of a trademark has certain rights, among them the power to prohibit another entity from using its mark without its consent. Those rights are subject to equitable defenses, including acquiescence, where the markholder affirmatively represents to another that it may use its mark, who then relies on that representation to its prejudice. This case requires us to clarify the role that undue prejudice plays in the analysis of acquiescence. Concluding that the defendant here failed to demonstrate that it was unduly prejudiced by any representations made by the markholder, we reverse. Case: 13-20558 Document: 00512945125 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2015 No. 13-20558 I. This is a dispute about a commercial relationship, one largely defined by the use of another’s intellectual property, gone bad. Pennzoil-Quaker State Company (“Pennzoil”), makes and sells automotive lubricants, including motor oil. As part of its business, Pennzoil owns several federally recognized trademarks and trade dress,1 notably the name “Pennzoil,” the “Pennzoil Across the Bell” logo, and a color scheme involving the use of yellow with black accents. -
In the Matter of Shell Oil Corporation, Et
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) Shell Oil Company, ) a corporation, ) ) File No. 971-0026 and ) ) Texaco Inc., ) a corporation. ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER The Federal Trade Commission ("Commission"), having initiated an investigation of proposed joint ventures between Shell Oil Company ("Shell"), and Texaco Inc. ("Texaco"), and it now appearing that Shell and Texaco, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "proposed respondents," are willing to enter into an agreement containing an order to divest certain assets and providing for other relief: IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between proposed respondents, by their duly authorized officers and attorneys, and counsel for the Commission that: 1. Proposed respondent Shell Oil Company is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware, with its office and principal place of business located at One Shell Plaza, Houston, Texas 77002. 2. Proposed respondent Texaco Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware, with its office and principal place of business located at 2000 Westchester Ave., White Plains, New York 10650. 3. Proposed respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the draft of Complaint here attached. 4. Proposed respondents waive: a. any further procedural steps; b. the requirement that the Commission's decision contain a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; c. all rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge or contest the validity of the order entered pursuant to this agreement; Page 2 of 20 and d.