DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey of Transport Efficiency Policies and Programs in APEC Economies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Survey 2.0 of Policies and Programs that Promote Fuel-Efficient Transport in APEC Economies The Alliance to Save Energy May 2008 Updated September 2009 EWG 03/2007A Prepared by: Judith Barry and Angela Morin Allen, Lead Authors Update by Laura van Wie McGrory, Diana Lin, and Sally Larsen Alliance to Save Energy 1850 M Street NW, Suite 600 Washington DC 20036 USA For: APEC Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2008 APEC Secretariat APEC#208-RE-01.10 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................................................iii Abbreviations and Units .................................................................................................................................... iv Case Studies .......................................................................................................................................................... v List of Figures and Tables ................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Increasing Fuel Economy of New Vehicles ............................................................................................. 1 Encouraging Purchase of Fuel-Efficient Vehicles ................................................................................... 2 Improving Operational Efficiency of Existing Vehicles ........................................................................ 2 Reducing Congestion .................................................................................................................................. 3 Boosting Efficiency and Use of Mass Transit .......................................................................................... 3 Urban Design and Planning to Reduce Vehicular Transport ............................................................... 3 Efficient Freight ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Increasing Fuel Economy of New Vehicles ............................................................................................. 6 Fuel Economy Standards for New Vehicles ............................................................................................ 6 Emissions Standards for New Vehicles that Improve Vehicle Fuel Economy ................................ 15 2. Encouraging Purchase of Fuel-Efficient Vehicles ................................................................................. 20 Vehicle Efficiency Labels and Ratings .................................................................................................... 20 Incentives to Purchase Efficient Vehicles ............................................................................................... 22 Efficient Government Fleets ..................................................................................................................... 25 Awareness Campaigns .............................................................................................................................. 27 3. Improving Operational Efficiency of Existing Vehicles ...................................................................... 29 Mandatory Vehicle Emissions Inspections ............................................................................................ 29 Retiring Old Vehicles ................................................................................................................................ 36 Tire Pressure ............................................................................................................................................... 38 4. Reducing Road Congestion ...................................................................................................................... 40 Congestion Pricing ..................................................................................................................................... 40 Maximizing Efficiency of Highway Lanes ............................................................................................. 49 Maximizing Traffic Flow on Surface Roads .......................................................................................... 50 Car Sharing ................................................................................................................................................. 52 Employee Incentives to Reduce Vehicle Traffic .................................................................................... 55 Car Pooling ................................................................................................................................................. 55 Van Pooling ................................................................................................................................................. 56 Telework ...................................................................................................................................................... 56 Mass Transit ................................................................................................................................................ 56 5. Boosting Efficiency and Use of Mass Transit ........................................................................................ 59 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ........................................................................................................................... 60 Light Rail and Subways ............................................................................................................................ 68 6. Urban Design and Planning to Reduce Vehicular Transport ............................................................. 71 ―Smart Growth‖ and Transit-Oriented Design and Development .................................................... 71 7. Promoting Fuel-Efficient Freight Transport .......................................................................................... 77 Energy Efficient Technologies for Heavy Vehicles .............................................................................. 77 Government Policies and Programs for the Commercial Freight Industry ..................................... 80 8. Cross-Cutting Approach: Taxes on Fuels ................................................................................................ 86 ii Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Mr. Jeffrey Skeer of the US Department of Energy and Mr. Sun Tao of the APEC Secretariat for their thoughtful guidance and support throughout this project. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of many individuals and organizations throughout the APEC region whose efforts over the years have provided the program examples we cite here – as well as an even larger number whose work was no less important but omitted due to limited space and resources. Last, many thanks to our colleagues at the Alliance and elsewhere who reviewed, commented, or otherwise advised us in the preparation of this report. Energy efficiency in the transportation sector remains an active field of innovation, and so we welcome comments, suggestions, and additional leads from readers. – Judith Barry – Angela Morin-Allen iii Abbreviations and Units APEC Asia Pacific Economic Cooperative APU auxiliary power unit BRT bus rapid transit Btu British thermal unit CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy CBD central business district CNG compressed natural gas CO2 carbon dioxide CO carbon monoxide cc cubic centimeters ERP electronic road pricing EU European Union GDP gross domestic product GHG greenhouse gas HC unburned hydrocarbons HOV high occupancy vehicle ITS intelligent transport system L liter LPG liquefied petroleum gas km kilometers mpg miles per gallon NOx nitrogen oxides psi pounds per square inch rpm revolutions per minute TOD transit-oriented design/development U.K. United Kingdom U.S. United States VKT vehicle-kilometer traveled iv Case Studies Thailand: Using Emissions Standards and Inspections to Induce Shift from 2-Stroke to 4-Stroke Motorcycles Mexico: Vehicle Inspections Program in Mexico City United States: Electronic Road Pricing for Stretch of Highway in California Korea: Congestion Pricing for Namsan Tunnel in Seoul Singapore: Cordon Electronic Road Pricing Chinese Taipei: Exclusive Motorcycle Lanes Japan: Car Sharing in Fukuoka United States: Washington State Commute Trip Reduction Program China: Expanding Bus Rapid Transit Thailand: Van Transit System in Bangkok Metropolitan Region Japan: Energy Conservation Law Improves Freight Efficiency United States: SmartWay Transport Partnership List of Figures and Tables Figure i Sustainable Road Transport Policies and Programs Identified in this Survey Figure 1 Vehicle production in top ten APEC producers, plus the EU-27 and Brazil Figure 2 Actual and Projected GHG Emissions for New Passenger Vehicles by Country/Region Figure 3 Efficient transmissions: an 8-speed automatic transmission at left and a continuously variable transmission, both by ZF Figure
Recommended publications
  • Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning a Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island

    Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning a Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island

    University of Prince Edward Island Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning A Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island Georgina Vardy 10/22/2012 A localized study, focused on Prince Edward Island, Canada, compiled to assist with determining social, economic and technological readiness for electric vehicles and the related infrastructure. The study used both a Christensen based disruptive technology framework approach and traditional marketing techniques to determine social and economic readiness. Residents showed an interest and aptitude for the social changes required however the financial affordability of the electric vehicles for residents was limited without nationally available, but locally deficient, incentives. A technology scan determined that electric vehicle battery chemical content and design are determining factors in effectively satisfying social needs and acceptance. The next stage includes localized marketing development for this unique location, vehicles sales and infrastructure. PERMISSION TO USE SIGNATURE PROJECT REPORT Title of Signature Project: Electric Vehicle Pre-Infrastructure Planning: A Discussion of Social, Economic, and Technological Readiness of Prince Edward Island Name of Author: Georgina Vardy Department: School of Business Degree: Master of Business Administration Year: 2012 Name of Supervisor(s): Tim Carroll In presenting this signature project report in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Prince Edward Island, the author has agreed that the Robertson Library, University of Prince Edward Island, may make this signature project freely available for inspection and gives permission to add an electronic version of the signature project to the Digital Repository at the University of Prince Edward Island.
  • CATA Assessment of Articulated Bus Utilization

    CATA Assessment of Articulated Bus Utilization

    (Page left intentionally blank) Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... E-1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................................................................................................E-1 Operating Environment Review ........................................................................................................................................................................................E-1 Peer Community and Best Practices Review...................................................................................................................................................................E-2 Review of Policies and Procedures and Service Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................E-2 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Best Practices in Operations ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Integration into the Existing Fleet ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • 3405 Carshare Report

    3405 Carshare Report

    Arlington Pilot Carshare Program FIRST-YEAR REPORT Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) Division of Transportation Department of Environmental Services April 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 INTRODUCTION . 3 What is Carsharing? . .3 Arlington: A Perfect Fit for Carsharing . 3 Two Carsharing Companies Operating in Arlington . 4 Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) . 4 ARLINGTON PILOT CARSHARING PROGRAM . 5 Public Private Partnership . .5 Program Goals . 5 Program Elements . 5 METHOD OF EVALUATION . 9 EVALUATION OF CARSHARE PILOT PROGRAM . 10 The Carshare Program Increased Availability, Membership and Use . 10 Arlington Carshare Members Trip Frequency and Purpose . 10 Arlington Carshare Members Rate Service Excellent . 11 Carsharing Members Feel Safer with Carshare Vehicles Parked On-Street . 11 Arlington Members More Confident Knowing Arlington is Carshare Partner . 12 Arlington Carsharing Members Reduce Vehicle-Miles Traveled (VMT) . 12 The Pilot Carsharing Program Encourages Transit-Oriented-Living . 13 Carsharing Provides Affordable Alternative to Car Ownership . 14 Arlington Carshare Members Reduce Car Ownership . 15 The Pilot Carshare Program Makes Efficient Use of Parking . 16 CONCLUSIONS . 17 EXTENDING AND EXPANDING SUCCESS . 18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ARSHARING IS A SELF-SERVICE, SHORT-TERM CAR-RENTAL SERVICE that is growing in Europe and North America and has been available in the Cmetropolitan Washington region since 2001. Carsharing complements Arlington’s urban-village neighborhoods by providing car service on demand without the cost and hassles associated with car ownership. In March 2004, the Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) unit of the Department of Environmental Services partnered with the two carshare companies—Flexcar and Zipcar—to provide expanded carshare services and promotions called the Arlington Pilot Carshare Program.
  • Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: a Global Update 2 Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: a Global Update

    Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: a Global Update 2 Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: a Global Update

    Cars and Climate Change Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: A Global Update 2 Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: A Global Update The goal of the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) is to dramatically reduce conventional pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from personal, public, and goods transportation in order to improve air quality and human health, and mitigate climate change. The Council is made up of leading government officials and experts from around the world that participate as individuals based on their experience with air quality and transportation issues. The ICCT promotes best practices and comprehensive solutions to improve vehicle emissions and efficiency, increase fuel quality and sustainability of alternative fuels, reduce pollution from the in-use fleet, and curtail emissions from international goods movement. www.theicct.org Published by The International Council on Clean Transportation © July 2007 The International Council on Clean Transportation Designed by Big Think Studios Printed on 100% recycled paper with soy-based ink This document does not necessarily represent the views of organizations or government agencies represented by ICCT reviewers or participants. 3 Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards: A Global Update Authors: Feng An Innovation Center for Energy and Transportation Deborah Gordon Transportation Policy Consultant Hui He, Drew Kodjak, and Daniel Rutherford International Council on Clean Transportation Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank our many colleagues around the world that have generously contributed their time and insight in reviewing and commenting on the draft version of this report. We would like to thank the Hewlett and Energy Foundations for making this report possible through their vision, energy and resources.
  • Coordinating Measures to Reduce Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S

    Coordinating Measures to Reduce Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S

    Putting Policy in Drive: Coordinating Measures to Reduce Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Vehicles by Christopher W. Evans B.Sc. Mechanical Engineering University Manitoba, 2004 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2008 © 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author................................................................................................................ Technology and Policy Program, Engineering Systems Division May 9, 2008 Certified by ............................................................................................................................ John B. Heywood Sun Jae Professor of Mechanical Engineering Director, Sloan Automotive Laboratory Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ........................................................................................................................... Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Technology and Policy Program 2 Putting Policy in Drive: Coordinating Measures to Reduce Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Vehicles by Christopher W. Evans Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division on May 9, 2008 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy Abstract The challenges of energy security and climate
  • Guaranteed Ride Home: U.S

    Guaranteed Ride Home: U.S

    Q Guaranteed Ride Home: U.S. Department of Transportation Taking the Worry Out of Ridesharing November 1990 Table of Contents Introduction What is a Guaranteed Ride Home program? i m Section 1: Program Design Outline Goals and Objectives / Understand Company and Employee Needs 2 Approximate the Number of Trips to be Taken 3 Identify Options 4 Recognize Liability Issues 9 Solicit Management Support lo m Program Implementation Choosing Options and Vendors 11 Writing a Policy 12 Eligibility Requirements 13 Valid Reasons for Using GRH Sen/ices 14 Restrictions 15 Procedures to Participate 16 Staffing 17 Budgeting 17 Cost to Employees 18 Methods of Payment 19 Marketing 20 Monitoring 20 Finding Help 21 m Appendix A: Research and Data Background Research 23 Cost Comparison of GRH Options 27 CTS's GRH Profile Usage Rates Among Southern California Companies 29 Appendix B: Resources Taxi Operators Resource List 33 Auto Rental Companies Resource List 35 Private Shuttle Companies Resource List 35 Community Sponsored Shuttles/Local Dial-A-Ride Companies Resource List 36 Public Transit Operators Resource List 40 GRH Contact List 42 u Appendix C: Samples Employee GRH Needs Assessment Survey 49 Vouchers 51 Central Billing Application and Other Rental Car Information 55 Fleet Vehicle Mileage Log 60 Fleet Vehicle GRH Agreement 61 TMO GRH Agreement with Participating Members 62 GRH Informed Consent, Release and Waiver of Liability 63 Letter to Supervisors 65 GRH Pre- Registration Application 66 Procedures to Participate 67 GRH Confirmation Report 68 GRH Marketing Materials 69 This handbook introduces the Guaranteed Ride Home program as an incentive to encourage ridesharing.
  • Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models

    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models

    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models Susan A. Shaheen1 and Nelson D. Chan2 Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Carsharing continues to grow worldwide as a powerful strategy to provide an alternative to solo driving. The viability of electric vehicles, or EVs, has been examined in various carsharing business models. Moreover, new technologies have given rise to electromobility, or e-mobility, systems. This paper discusses the evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models and the challenges and opportunities that EVs present to carsharing operators around the world. Operators are now anticipating increased EV proliferation into vehicle fleets over the next 5- 10 years as technology, infrastructure, and public policy shift toward support of e- mobility systems. Thus, research is still needed to quantify impacts of EVs in changing travel behavior toward more sustainable transport. 1 Introduction Carsharing enables a group of members to share a vehicle fleet that is maintained, managed, and insured by a third-party organization. Primarily used for short-term trips, carsharing can provide affordable, self-service vehicle access 24-h per day for those who do not have a car, want to reduce the number of vehicles in their household, or do not use their vehicle during the day for long periods of time. Rates include fuel, insurance, and maintenance. Ideally, carsharing works best in a neighborhood, business, or campus setting where users could walk, bike, share rides, or take public transit to access the shared-use vehicles. Carsharing has evolved through several phases since the first carsharing system began in Europe in 1948.
  • Sharing and Tourism: the Rise of New Markets in Transport

    Sharing and Tourism: the Rise of New Markets in Transport

    SHARING AND TOURISM: THE RISE OF NEW MARKEts IN TRANSPORT Documents de travail GREDEG GREDEG Working Papers Series Christian Longhi Marcello M. Mariani Sylvie Rochhia GREDEG WP No. 2016-01 http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr/working-papers.html Les opinions exprimées dans la série des Documents de travail GREDEG sont celles des auteurs et ne reflèlent pas nécessairement celles de l’institution. Les documents n’ont pas été soumis à un rapport formel et sont donc inclus dans cette série pour obtenir des commentaires et encourager la discussion. Les droits sur les documents appartiennent aux auteurs. The views expressed in the GREDEG Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the institution. The Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Sharing and Tourism: The Rise of New Markets in Transport Christian Longhi1, Marcello M. Mariani2 and Sylvie Rochhia1 1University Nice Sophia Antipolis, GREDEG, CNRS, 250 rue A. Einstein, 06560 Valbonne France [email protected], [email protected] 2University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca, 34 – 40126, Bologna, Italy [email protected] GREDEG Working Paper No. 2016-01 Abstract. This paper analyses the implications of sharing on tourists and tourism focusing on the transportation sector. The shifts from ownership to access, from products to services have induced dramatic changes triggered by the emergence of innovative marketplaces. The services offered by Knowledge Innovative Service Suppliers, start-ups at the origin of innovative marketplaces run through platforms allow the tourists to find solutions to run themselves their activities, bypassing the traditional tourism industry.
  • Optimal Automated Demand Responsive Feeder Transit Operation and Its Impact

    Optimal Automated Demand Responsive Feeder Transit Operation and Its Impact

    Final Report Optimal Automated Demand Responsive Feeder Transit Operation and Its Impact Principal Investigator Young-Jae Lee, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies, Morgan State University, 1700 E. Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251 Tel: 443-885-1872; Fax: 443-885-8218; Email: [email protected] Co-Principal Investigator Amirreza Nickkar Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies, Morgan State University, 1700 E. Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251 Email: [email protected] Date September 2018 Prepared for the Urban Mobility & Equity Center, Morgan State University, CBEIS 327, 1700 E. Coldspring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to thank Mana Meskar and Sina Sahebi, Ph.D. students at Sharif University of Technology, for their contributions to this study. This research was supported by the Urban Mobility & Equity Center at Morgan State University and the University Transportation Center(s) Program of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. ©Morgan State University, 2018. Non-exclusive rights are retained by the U.S. DOT. 2 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Optimal Automated Demand Responsive Feeder Transit September 2018 Operation and Its Impact 6.
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area

    20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area

    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
  • Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices

    Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices

    SHared automation Operating models for Worldwide adoption SHOW Grant Agreement Number: 875530 D2.1.: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices This report is part of a project that has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement number 875530 Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above-referenced consortium members shall have no liability to third parties for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SHOW Consortium. This report is subject to a disclaimer and copyright. This report has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission, contract number: 875530. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the SHOW project. D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 2 Executive Summary D2.1 provides the state-of-the-art for business and operating roles in the field of mobility services (MaaS, LaaS and DRT containing the mobility services canvas as description of the selected representative mobility services, the business and operating models describing relevant business factors and operation environment, the user and role analysis representing the involved user and roles for the mobility services (providing, operating and using the service) as well as identifying the success and failure models of the analysed mobility services and finally a KPI-Analysis (business- driven) to give a structured economical evaluation as base for the benchmarking.
  • User Perspectives on Location Efficient Mortgages & Car Sharing

    User Perspectives on Location Efficient Mortgages & Car Sharing

    2005-24 Final Report User Perspectives on Location Efficient Mortgages & Car Sharing Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC – 2005-24 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date User Perspectives on Location Efficient Mortgages & Car Sharing June 2005 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kevin Krizek 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 301 19th Avenue South (c) 81655 (wo) 50 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation Final Report Research Services Section 395 John Ireland Boulevard Mail Stop 330 14. Sponsoring Agency Code St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 15. Supplementary Notes http://www.lrrb.org/PDF/200524.pdf 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) A burgeoning population seeking relatively affordable housing is placing high demands on outlying, auto-dependent residential markets. Simultaneously, public policies addressing housing, transportation, and land use aim to increase homeownership, decrease drive-alone travel, and harness outlying development. A relatively new mortgage lending procedure aims to address each of these public policy aims synergistically by allowing low- and moderate-income households the opportunity to purchase homes in transit-accessible neighborhoods that would otherwise be unobtainable because of cost. The goal of this research is to evaluate this initiative, as well as position it within the broader goals of smart growth, describe its application, and comment on its prospects. This report constitutes a primer of the current state of knowledge about these unique loan programs.