UNEP-POPS-COP 5-INF-27.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNEP-POPS-COP 5-INF-27.Pdf UNITED NATIONS SC UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/27 Distr.: General 11 April 2011 Stockholm Convention English only on Persistent Organic Pollutants Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Fifth meeting Geneva, 25–29 April 2011 Item 4 (j) of the provisional agenda* Matters related to the implementation of the Convention: effectiveness evaluation Draft revised guidance on the global monitoring plan for persistent organic pollutants Note by the Secretariat 1. By its decision SC-4/31 the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants adopted the terms of reference and mandate of the regional organization groups and the global coordination group and requested the Secretariat to support the global coordination group in updating the guidance document for the global monitoring plan with additional chapters on long-range transport, specimen banking and the impact of listing new chemicals in the Convention. 2. In response to the above request, the Secretariat convened an expert group comprising members of the global coordination group and invited experts from relevant fields and organized two meetings from 12 to 14 April 2010 and 4 to 6 October 2010 to evaluate the impact on the guidance on the global monitoring plan for persistent organic pollutants of the listing by the Conference of the Parties of nine new chemicals in the annexes to the Convention, and to revise the guidance document as appropriate. 3. The results of the expert group’s work were considered by the global coordination group for the global monitoring plan at a meeting held from 8 to 10 March 2011. The report of that meeting is provided in document UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/25. 4. The coordination group assessed the draft revised technical guidance on the sampling and analysis of new persistent organic pollutants in ambient air and human milk and blood, new information on environmental specimen banking, and sampling and analysis of new persistent organic pollutants in other media. The coordination group also revised the strategy, process and draft structure for the regional reports to include aspects related to subsequent effectiveness evaluations. 5. The coordination group has submitted the draft revised guidance on the global monitoring plan for persistent organic pollutants for consideration by the Conference of the Parties. It is provided in the annex to the present note and has not been formally edited. * UNEP/POPS/COP.5/1. K1171261 180411 UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/27 DDRRAAFFTT RREEVVIISSEEDD GGUUIIDDAANNCCEE OONN TTHHEE GGLLOOBBAALL MMOONNIITTOORRIINNGG PPLLAANN FFOORR PPEERRSSIISSTTEENNTT OORRGGAANNIICC PPOOLLLLUUTTAANNTTSS UNEP March 2011 2 UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/27 Draft revised guidance for the Global Monitoring Plan for persistent organic pollutant UNEP, March 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The following experts are gratefully acknowledged for their valuable contributions to the revision of this guidance document: Mr. Tom Harner (Canada)*, Mr. Derek Muir (Canada), Mr. Zongwei Cai (China), Mr. Minghui Zheng (China)**, Mr. Ivan Holoubek (Czech Republic)*, Ms. Jana Klanova (Czech Republic), Mr. Yasuyuki Shibata (Japan)*, Mr. Roland Kallenborn (Norway), Mr. Torkjel Sandanger (Norway), Mr. Ramon Guardans (Spain)*, Mr. Bert van Bavel (Sweden), Ms. Britta Hedlund (Sweden) and Ms. Heidelore Fiedler (UNEP/DTIE Chemicals Branch). In addition, the revised guidance document was reviewed by further members of the global coordination group for the global monitoring plan: Mr. Malverne P. Spencer (Antigua and Barbuda), Ms. Anahit Aleksandryan (Armenia), Ms. Sara Broomhall (Australia), Mr. Lorenzo Caballero (Chile)***, Mr. Trajce Stafilov (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia), Mr. Sundar Ramanhathan (India), Mr. Vincent Odongo Madadi (Kenya), Ms. Halimatou Kone Esp Traore (Mali), Ms. Ana Patricia Martínez Bolivar (Mexico)*** and Mr. Najib Belmekki (Morocco). The following experts are acknowledged for their initial contributions to the production of the preliminary version of the guidance document: Mr. Juan Carlos Colombo (Argentina); Mr. Lars-Otto Reiersen (AMAP); Mr. Tom Harner (Canada); Mr. Oladele Osibanjo (Nigeria); Mr. Janneche Utne Skaare (Norway); Mr. Hindrik Bouwman, (South Africa); Mr. Anders Bignert (Sweden); Mr. Bo Jansson (Sweden); Mr. Bo Wahlström (Sweden); Ms. Heidelore Fiedler (UNEP/DTIE Chemicals Brach); Mr. Jørgen Schlundt (WHO). Initial input was also provided by further members of the Provisional ad hoc Technical Working Group for the global monitoring plan: Mr. Peter Weiss (Austria), Ms. Therese Yarde (Barbados), Mr. Mansourou Moudachirou (Benin), Ms. Tsvetanka Dimcheva (Bulgaria), Mr. Indrani Chandrasekharan (India), Mr. Demba Sidibe (Mali), Mr. Nee Sun Choong Kwet Yive (Mauritius), Ms. Anna Cumanova (Moldova) and Mr. Tor Johannessen (Norway). The support from Stockholm Convention Secretariat technical staff and contribution from UNEP/DTIE Chemicals Brach for the production of the initial draft is gratefully acknowledged. These contributions include input from Mr. David Stone, Mr. Frank Wania, Ms. Pierrette Blanchard, Mr. Len Barrie and Mr. José Sericano. DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentations in this volume are possible options, based on expert judgment, for the purpose of providing comparable POPs monitoring data for the effectiveness evaluation of the Stockholm Convention. UNEP or contributory organizations cannot be liable for misuse of the information contained in it. * Members of the expert group on the revision of the guidance document, of the global coordination group for the global monitoring plan and the provisional ad hoc technical working group for the global monitoring plan ** Member of the expert group on the revision of the guidance document and of the global coordination group for the global monitoring plan *** Also members of the provisional ad hoc technical working group for the global monitoring plan 3 UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/27 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS List of abbreviations AMAP Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme ANCOVA Analysis of Covariance ANOVA Analysis of Variance BCF Bioconcentration Factor CEEPOPsCTR Central and Eastern European Centre for Persistent Organic Pollutants CEP Caspian Environment Programme CITES Conference on International Trade in Endangered Species COP Conference of the Parties (to a Convention) CRM Certified Reference Material CTD The characteristic travel distance– defined as the “half-distance” (analogous to a half-life) for a substance present in a mobile phase CV Coefficient of Variation DDD Metabolite of DDT DDE Metabolite of DDT ECD Electron capture detector ECEH European Centre for Environment and Health EMEP Co-operative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-Range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations GAPS Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling Survey GAW Global Atmosphere Watch GC Gas chromatography GEF Global Environment Fund GEMS Global Environment Monitoring System GMP Global Monitoring Plan GPC Gel permeation chromatography GPS Global positioning system HELCOM Helsinki Commission/The Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission HPLC High performance liquid chromatography HRGC High resolution gas chromatography (capillary column) HRMS High resolution mass spectrometer I L Instrumentation level IADN Integrated Atmospheric Deposition Network ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Sea IMO International Maritime Organisation 4 UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/27 INSPQ Centre de Toxicologie du Québec IP/RP International/regional programmes IPCS International Programme on Chemical Safety JECFA Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives LOD Limit of detection LOQ Limit of quantification LRM Laboratory Reference Material LRMS Low resolution mass spectrometer LRTAP Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention (under the auspices of UNECE) LRTP Long-range transport potential MDL Method detection limit MONARPOP Monitoring Network in the Alpine Region for Persistent Organic pollutants MS Mass selective detector NGOs Non-governmental organisations OC Organochlorine OCP Organochlorine pesticide OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OSPAR Oslo Paris Commissions, Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North East Atlantic PCB Polychlorinated biphenyls PCDD Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins PCDF Polychlorinated dibenzofurans POPs Persistent organic pollutants PRTRs Pollutant release and transfer registers PTS Persistent toxic substances PUF Polyurethane foam QA/QC Quality assurance and quality control regimes ROGs Regional organization groups for the Global Monitoring Plan SMOC The Sound Management of Chemicals (SMOC) initiative under the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) SOP Standard operating procedure TCDD Tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin TEF Toxic equivalency factor TEQ Toxicity equivalents UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNEP United Nations Environment Programme WHO World Heath Organisation WMO World Meteorological Organization XAD Styrene/divinylbenzene-co-polymer resin 5 UNEP/POPS/COP.5/INF/27 Glossary of terms Activity Any programme or other activity or project that generates data or information on the levels of POPs in the environment or in humans that can contribute to the effectiveness evaluation under Article 16 of the Stockholm Convention Core matrices These are the matrices identified
Recommended publications
  • Developmental Study of Soot-Oxidation Catalysts for Fireplaces: the Effect of Binder and Preparation Techniques on Catalyst Texture and Activity
    catalysts Article Developmental Study of Soot-Oxidation Catalysts for Fireplaces: The Effect of Binder and Preparation Techniques on Catalyst Texture and Activity Pauliina Nevalainen, Niko Kinnunen * and Mika Suvanto University of Eastern Finland, Department of Chemistry, P. O. Box 111, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland; Pauliina.Nevalainen@uef.fi (P.N.); mika.suvanto@uef.fi (M.S.) * Correspondence: niko.kinnunen@uef.fi Received: 8 October 2019; Accepted: 13 November 2019; Published: 15 November 2019 Abstract: An awareness of increasing climate and health problems has driven the development of new functional and affordable soot-oxidation catalysts for stationary sources, such as fireplaces. In this study, Al(OH)3, water glass and acidic aluminium phosphate binder materials were mixed with soot-oxidation catalysts. The effect of the binder on the performance of the Ag/La-Al2O3 catalyst was examined, while the Pt/La-Al2O3 catalyst bound with Al(OH)3 was used as a reference. Soot was oxidised above 340 ◦C on the Ag/La-Al2O3 catalyst, but at 310 ◦C with same catalyst bound with Al(OH)3. The addition of water glass decreased the catalytic performance because large silver crystals and agglomeration resulted in a blockage of the support material’s pores. Pt/La-Al2O3 bound with Al(OH)3 was ineffective in a fireplace environment. We believe that AgOx is the active form of silver in the catalyst. Hence, Ag/La-Al2O3 was shown to be compatible with the Al(OH)3 binder as an effective catalyst for fireplace soot oxidation. Keywords: binder; silver; Al(OH)3; fireplace; soot emission 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Black Carbon and Soot the Same? Title Page
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 24821–24846, 2012 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/24821/2012/ Chemistry ACPD doi:10.5194/acpd-12-24821-2012 and Physics © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions 12, 24821–24846, 2012 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry Are black carbon and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP if available. and soot the same? P. R. Buseck et al. Are black carbon and soot the same? Title Page P. R. Buseck1,2, K. Adachi1,2,3, A. Gelencser´ 4, E.´ Tompa4, and M. Posfai´ 4 Abstract Introduction 1School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85282, USA Conclusions References 2 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85282, USA Tables Figures 3Atmospheric Environment and Applied Meteorology Research Department, Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pannonia, Veszprem,´ J I Hungary J I Received: 1 September 2012 – Accepted: 3 September 2012 – Published: 21 September 2012 Back Close Correspondence to: P. R. Buseck ([email protected]) Full Screen / Esc Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 24821 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract ACPD The climate change and environmental literature, including that on aerosols, is replete with mention of black carbon (BC), but neither reliable samples nor standards exist. 12, 24821–24846, 2012 Thus, there is uncertainty about its exact nature.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration
    2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration There are approximately 170 sewage sludge incineration (SSI) plants in operation in the United States. Three main types of incinerators are used: multiple hearth, fluidized bed, and electric infrared. Some sludge is co-fired with municipal solid waste in combustors based on refuse combustion technology (see Section 2.1). Refuse co-fired with sludge in combustors based on sludge incinerating technology is limited to multiple hearth incinerators only. Over 80 percent of the identified operating sludge incinerators are of the multiple hearth design. About 15 percent are fluidized bed combustors and 3 percent are electric. The remaining combustors co-fire refuse with sludge. Most sludge incinerators are located in the Eastern United States, though there are a significant number on the West Coast. New York has the largest number of facilities with 33. Pennsylvania and Michigan have the next-largest numbers of facilities with 21 and 19 sites, respectively. Sewage sludge incinerator emissions are currently regulated under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart O and 40 CFR Part 61, Subparts C and E. Subpart O in Part 60 establishes a New Source Performance Standard for particulate matter. Subparts C and E of Part 61--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)--establish emission limits for beryllium and mercury, respectively. In 1989, technical standards for the use and disposal of sewage sludge were proposed as 40 CFR Part 503, under authority of Section 405 of the Clean Water Act. Subpart G of this proposed Part 503 proposes to establish national emission limits for arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and total hydrocarbons from sewage sludge incinerators.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation for Global Action on Persistent Organic Pollutants: a United States Perspective
    The Foundation for Global Action on Persistent Organic Pollutants: A United States Perspective Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20460 EPA/600/P-01/003F NCEA-I-1200 March 2002 www.epa.gov Disclaimer Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Cover page credits: Bald eagle, U.S. FWS; mink, Joe McDonald/Corbis.com; child, family photo, Jesse Paul Nagaruk; polar bear, U.S. FWS; killer whales, Craig Matkin. Contents Contributors ................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary ....................................................................................... ix Chapter 1. Genesis of the Global Persistent Organic Pollutant Treaty ............ 1-1 Why Focus on POPs? ................................................................................................. 1-2 The Four POPs Parameters: Persistence, Bioaccumulation, Toxicity, Long-Range Environmental Transport ......................................................... 1-5 Persistence ......................................................................................................... 1-5 Bioaccumulation ................................................................................................. 1-6 Toxicity .............................................................................................................. 1-7 Long-Range Environmental Transport .................................................................. 1-7 POPs
    [Show full text]
  • Black Carbon's Properties and Role in the Environment
    Sustainability 2010, 2, 294-320; doi:10.3390/su2010294 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Review Black Carbon’s Properties and Role in the Environment: A Comprehensive Review Gyami Shrestha 1,*, Samuel J. Traina 1 and Christopher W. Swanston 2 1 Environmental Systems Program, Sierra Nevada Research Institute, University of California- Merced, 5200 N. Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Northern Institute of Applied Carbon Science, Climate, Fire, & Carbon Cycle Science Research, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 410 MacInnes Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 13 November 2009 / Accepted: 7 January 2010 / Published: 15 January 2010 Abstract: Produced from incomplete combustion of biomass and fossil fuel in the absence of oxygen, black carbon (BC) is the collective term for a range of carbonaceous substances encompassing partly charred plant residues to highly graphitized soot. Depending on its form, condition of origin and storage (from the atmosphere to the geosphere), and surrounding environmental conditions, BC can influence the environment at local, regional and global scales in different ways. In this paper, we review and synthesize recent findings and discussions on the nature of these different forms of BC and their impacts, particularly in relation to pollution and climate change. We start by describing the different types of BCs and their mechanisms of formation. To elucidate their pollutant sorption properties, we present some models involving polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and organic carbon. Subsequently, we discuss the stability of BC in the environment, summarizing the results of studies that showed a lack of chemical degradation of BC in soil and those that exposed BC to severe oxidative reactions to degrade it.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Persistent Organic Pollutants
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 30 Issue 1 Article 3 June 2012 Arctic Justice: Addressing Persistent Organic Pollutants Elizabeth Burleson Stephanie Dodson Dougherty Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Elizabeth Burleson & Stephanie Dodson Dougherty, Arctic Justice: Addressing Persistent Organic Pollutants, 30(1) LAW & INEQ. 57 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol30/iss1/3 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 57 Arctic Justice: Addressing Persistent Organic Pollutants Elizabeth Burlesont & Stephanie Dodson Doughertytt Introduction Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), anthropogenic chemicals produced for or by agricultural and industrial uses, contaminate all regions of the world.! There are three general categories of POPs: pesticides (including insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides), industrial chemicals, and unintentionally produced byproducts of certain chemical and combustion processes.2 The pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) is perhaps the most well known of the POPs.' It was heavily relied upon during World War II to control the spread of certain diseases and is still used to control malaria in several developing nations.' Another POP is a class of chemicals collectively known as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which are widely used as dielectric fluid in transformers and capacitors. Dioxins are an example of unintentionally produced POPs.' These are chemicals released by incomplete combustion or by the manufacture of certain pesticides.' Although these chemicals are produced for beneficial purposes (or as a byproduct), it has become apparent t. Professor Elizabeth Burleson has an LL.M. from the London School of Economics and Political Science and a J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Waste Incineration Modelling for Advanced Moving Grate Incinerators
    sustainability Article Solid Waste Incineration Modelling for Advanced Moving Grate Incinerators 1, 1, 1,2, Mingtao Jiang y, Adrian C. H. Lai y and Adrian Wing-Keung Law * 1 Environmental Process Modelling Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore; [email protected] (M.J.); [email protected] (A.C.H.L.) 2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +65-6790-5296 Mingtao Jiang and Adrian C. H. Lai contributed equally to this work as first authors. y Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 22 September 2020; Published: 28 September 2020 Abstract: Currently, the design of advanced moving grate (AMG) incinerators for solid waste is aided by computational simulations. The simulation approach couples a waste bed model to characterize the incineration processes of the waste material on top of the moving grate, with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to reproduce the heated air movement and reactions in the incinerator space above. However, the simulation results of AMG incinerators are rarely compared with actual field measurements for validation in the literature so far. In this study, we first examine the sensitivity of pyrolysis kinetics in the waste bed model using three existing alternatives. The predictions of combustion characteristics, including the bed height, flow and temperature distributions, composition of stack gases and gas emissions are obtained for the three alternatives and compared with measurements from a simple laboratory furnace. The results show that the pyrolysis kinetics mechanism can significantly affect the outputs from the waste bed model for incineration modelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Characteristics of Char and Soot in the Atmosphere and Their Ratio As an Indicator for Source Identification in Xi’An, China
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 595–607, 2010 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/595/2010/ Atmospheric © Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under Chemistry the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. and Physics Different characteristics of char and soot in the atmosphere and their ratio as an indicator for source identification in Xi’an, China Y. M. Han1,2, J.J. Cao1,3, S. C. Lee2,1, K. F. Ho2,1, and Z. S. An1 1SKLLQG, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710075, China 2Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hum, Kowloon, Hong Kong 3Department of Environmental Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China Received: 15 May 2009 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 16 June 2009 Revised: 13 December 2009 – Accepted: 11 January 2010 – Published: 22 January 2010 Abstract. Numerous definitions and analytical techniques similar seasonal trends, with high concentrations in winter for elemental (or black) carbon (EC) have been published in and low concentrations in summer, while soot-EC revealed the scientific literature, but still no generally accepted inter- relatively small seasonal variations, with maximum concen- disciplinary definition exists. EC is not a single chemical tration (1.85±0.72 µg m−3) in spring and minimum concen- compound, but is mainly composed of two parts of carbon tration (1.15±0.47 µg m−3) in summer. The strong corre- contents: combustion residues from pyrolysis and combus- lation between EC and char-EC (R2 = 0.99) and poor cor- tion emissions formed via gas-to-particle conversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Health | Article
    Children’s Health | Article Early-Life Environmental Risk Factors for Asthma: Findings from the Children’s Health Study Muhammad Towhid Salam, Yu-Fen Li, Bryan Langholz, and Frank Davis Gilliland Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA of each participating student provided written Early-life experiences and environmental exposures have been associated with childhood asthma. To informed consent and completed a self- investigate further whether the timing of such experiences and exposures is associated with the occur- administered questionnaire. rence of asthma by 5 years of age, we conducted a prevalence case–control study nested within the We used a countermatched sampling Children’s Health Study, a population-based study of > 4,000 school-aged children in 12 southern design (Langholz and Goldstein 2001) to California communities. Cases were defined as physician-diagnosed asthma by age 5, and controls select subjects for this nested case–control were asthma-free at study entry, frequency-matched on age, sex, and community of residence and study. Our study base consisted of 4,244 of countermatched on in utero exposure to maternal smoking. Telephone interviews were conducted the 6,259 children, who were between 8 and with mothers to collect additional exposure and asthma histories. Conditional logistic regression mod- 18 years of age at the time of enrollment in els were fitted to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Asthma diagnosis the CHS and had completed active follow-up before 5 years of age was associated with exposures in the first year of life to wood or oil smoke, soot, at schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Densities of Soot Particles and Their Relationships with The
    https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-526 Preprint. Discussion started: 29 July 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Effective densities of soot particles and their relationships with the mixing state at an urban site of the Beijing mega-city in the winter of 2018 Hang LIU1,2, Xiaole PAN1, Yu WU3, Dawei Wang1, Yu TIAN1,2, Xiaoyong LIU1,4, Lu LEI1,2, Yele 5 SUN1,2,4, Pingqing FU5, Zifa WANG1,2,4 1 State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China 3State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of 10 Sciences, No. 20 Datun Road, Beijing 100101, China 4Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Xiamen, 361021, China 5Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China Correspondence to: Xiaole PAN ([email protected]) 15 Abstract The effective density (ρeff) of refractory black carbon (rBC) is a key parameter relevant to their mixing state that imposes great uncertainty when evaluating the direct radiation forcing effect. In this study, a novel tandem DMA-CPMA-SP2 system was used to investigate the relationship between the effective density (ρeff) and the mixing state of rBC particles during the 20 winter of 2018 in the Beijing mega-city. During the experiment, aerosols with a known mobility diameter (Dmob) and known 3 ρeff values (0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.8 g/cm ) were selected and measured by the SP2 to obtain their corresponding mixing states.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDELINES for a SPECIAL WASTE INCINERATOR 1 The
    GUIDELINES FOR A SPECIAL WASTE INCINERATOR 1 The special waste incinerator shall be sited on an approved industrial premises. 2 The incinerator shall be designed with a combustion efficiency to destroy and remove principal organic hazardous constituents by at least 99.99%. Should the incinerator be used to destroy and remove extremely toxic and environmentally persistent wastes such as polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), the incinerator shall be designed with a destruction and removal efficiency of at least 99.9999%. 3 The incineration process, including the feeding process, shall be automated to ensure that the operating temperature, the emission limits, and the destruction and removal efficiency are kept to within design limits at all times. 4 The incinerator shall be designed to incinerate wastes generated by the local industries. ( No imports of wastes are allowed ) 5 The incinerator shall be equipped with flue gas cleaning equipment to comply with the National Air Emission Standards (at Appendix 1) and the special incinerator emission standards at Appendix 2, which ever is the most stringent. Continuous on-line monitoring of the flue gas emission shall be provided for particulates, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen flouride, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide. 6 Continuous on-line monitoring and recording charts shall be installed for: (a) the monitoring and recording of the temperatures and oxygen levels in the incineration chambers; and (b) the monitoring and recording of the levels of particulates, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen flouride, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide in the flue gas emission. 7 Fugitive emission control of hydrocarbons shall be incorporated into the plant design.
    [Show full text]
  • Diesel Particulate Filter: Exhaust Aftertreatment for the Reduction of Soot Emissions
    Engine technology Diesel Particulate Filter: Exhaust aftertreatment for the reduction of soot emissions Authors: A diesel particulate filter (DPF) can remove virtually all the soot particulates (PM) from the exhaust gas emitted from a diesel engine to ensure compliance with very strict emission Guido Schäffner standards. Regardless of the actual emission limit, diesel particulate filters satisfy the Design Exhaust Aftertreatment needs of operators who place importance on achieving extremely low soot emissions. Klaus Rusch Diesel particulate filters mean less soot oxides when internal engine measures are Design Exhaust Aftertreatment The emission regulations for diesel engines are used — if fewer soot particulates are produced becoming increasingly stricter worldwide, during the combustion process, the quantity of Dr. Daniel Chatterjee which makes modifications to the drive systems nitrogen oxides increases, and vice versa. In Pre-Development Exhaust Aftertreatment necessary. As a basic principle, MTU’s ap- situations where emission requirements are proach to achieve compliance is to reduce very strict, therefore, adding a diesel particu - Dr. Günter Zitzler emission levels by means of internal engine late filter is necessary, since it removes Thermodynamics and Turbocharging Systems enhancements. Depending on the specific 90 percent or more of the soot particulates emission limits, it may be possible to do with- from the exhaust. out a diesel particulate filter altogether. Howev- er, there is a relationship between the For example, very stringent emission limits are production of soot particulates and nitrogen due to come into force for diesel locomotives in www.mtu-online.com Europe as of 2012. The EU Stage IIIB standard lowers the limit for particulate matter emissions Fig.
    [Show full text]