DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ethnic Political Parties of Myanmar (2018 Update)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ethnic Political Parties of Myanmar (2018 Update) The Ethnic Political Parties of Myanmar (2018 update) States/ States/ States/ Total No. of elected No. of candidates fielded by parties No. of candidates fielded by parties 2017 No. of candidates fielded by parties 2018 Union Union Union UPDJC Regions Regions Regions candidates in both 2015 General Elections By-Elections By-Elections No. Parties Parliament Parliament Parliament UPDJC Working NBF UNA Parliaments Parliaments Parliaments parliaments by parties 2015 2017 2018 Committees 2015 2017 2018 2015+2017+2018 Total LH UP S/R Ethnic Total LH UP S/R Ethnic Total LH UP S/R Ethnic 1 Akha National Development Party 1 1 1 7 1 5 1 1 1 0 2 All Mon Regions Democracy Party 1 1 1 1 x 35 7 10 17 1 1 1 0 3 Arakan League for Democracy Party 0 x 0 0 3 1 2 4 Arakan National Party 22 23 1 46 1 1 x 79 21 15 41 2 0 1 1 5 Arakan Patriot Party 0 x 16 5 3 8 0 0 6 Asho Chin National Party 0 x 10 2 6 2 0 0 7 Chin League for Democracy 1 1 x 27 7 5 14 1 0 2 2 8 Chin National Democratic Party 0 x 58 13 13 29 3 1 1 1 1 9 Chin Progressive Party 0 x 23 4 5 13 1 0 1 1 10 Daingnet National Development Party 0 3 1 2 0 0 11 Danu National Democracy Party 0 x 19 5 3 11 0 0 12 Danu National Organization Party 0 x 7 2 1 4 0 0 13 Dawei Nationalities Party 0 x 13 3 3 7 0 0 14 Eastern Shan State Development Democratic Party 0 7 2 1 4 0 0 15 Ethnic National Development Party 0 x 7 1 2 4 0 0 16 Federal Union Party 0 x 37 12 3 22 0 0 17 Inn National Development Party 0 x 6 1 1 3 1 0 0 18 Inn Nationalities League Party 0 x 5 1 3 1 0 0 19 Ka Man National Development Party 0 4 1 1 2 0 0 20 Kachin Democratic Party 0 x 32 8 3 21 0 1 1 21 Kachin State Democracy Party 1 3 4 1 1 55 14 8 33 0 0 22 Karen National Democratic Party 0 28 3 10 13 2 0 0 23 Karen National Party 0 x 25 4 1 16 4 0 0 24 Kayah State Democratic Party 1 1 2 1 x 53 10 19 23 1 1 1 0 25 Kayan National Party 0 x 13 3 2 8 0 0 26 Kayin People's Party 1 1 1 1 122 25 22 70 5 0 0 27 Kha Me National Development Party 0 x 5 2 3 0 0 28 Khumi (Khami) National Party 0 x 5 1 2 2 0 0 29 Kokang Democracy and Unity Party 1 1 1 x 6 2 4 0 0 30 Lahu National Development Party 2 2 1 29 9 1 18 1 2 2 0 31 Lhaovo National Unity and Development Party 0 21 6 3 12 0 0 32 Lisu National Development Party 2 3 5 1 1 28 7 2 18 1 0 0 33 Mon National Party 1 1 1 1 x 54 13 12 28 1 1 1 0 34 Mro National Democracy Party 0 x 4 1 2 1 0 0 35 Mro National Development Party 0 6 1 1 4 0 0 36 Mro National Party 0 x 5 2 3 0 0 37 Pao National Organization 4 6 10 1 1 x 22 6 3 13 0 0 38 Phalon-Sawaw Democratic Party 0 x 48 9 13 22 4 1 1 0 39 Rakhine State National United Party 0 19 5 2 12 0 0 40 Shan Nationalities Democratic Party 1 1 1 x 206 56 19 123 8 7 2 5 2 1 1 41 Shan Nationalities League for Democracy 15 26 1 4 1 47 1 1 x 151 45 14 90 2 7 2 5 2 1 1 42 Shan State Kokang Democratic Party 0 x 10 3 7 0 0 43 Shan-ni & Northern Shan Ethnics Solidarity Party 0 x 17 1 2 14 0 1 1 44 Ta-Arng (Palaung) National Party 5 7 12 1 1 x 27 8 3 16 0 0 45 Tai-leng Nationalities Development Party 1 1 1 x 58 12 11 31 4 0 0 46 The Kachin National Congress 0 x 31 9 22 0 0 47 Union PaO National Organization 0 16 3 2 9 2 0 0 48 United Nationalities Federal Democracy Party 0 0 0 2 1 1 49 Unity and Democracy Party of Kachin State 1 1 1 9 1 2 6 0 0 50 Wa Democratic Party 1 1 1 x 11 4 1 6 0 0 51 Wa Liberal Democratic Development Party 0 0 2 2 0 52 Wa National Unity Party 1 1 1 x 16 5 1 10 0 0 53 Women Party (Mon) 0 4 1 3 0 0 54 Zo National Region Development 0 6 1 1 4 0 1 1 55 Zomi Congress for Democracy 4 2 6 1 1 x 10 3 6 1 0 0 Total of EPPs 56 80 2 5 0 2 145 10 19 22 15 1515 369 234 863 49 24 7 0 17 0 17 6 2 7 2 *The list of ethnic political parties used in this matrix was established in June 2018. Some parties may have since dissolved, and others may have emerged from the ongoing merger processes. ** Candidate data was updated following the by-elections of November 2018..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Important Facts About the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - Emref
    Important Facts about the 2015 Myanmar General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation (EMReF) 2015 October Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF 1 Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF ENLIGHTENED MYANMAR RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT FOUNDATION (EMReF) This report is a product of the Information Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation EMReF is an accredited non-profit research Strategies for Societies in Transition program. (EMReF has been carrying out political-oriented organization dedicated to socioeconomic and This program is supported by United States studies since 2012. In 2013, EMReF published the political studies in order to provide information Agency for International Development Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010- and evidence-based recommendations for (USAID), Microsoft, the Bill & Melinda Gates 2012). Recently, EMReF studied The Record different stakeholders. EMReF has been Foundation, and the Tableau Foundation.The Keeping and Information Sharing System of extending its role in promoting evidence-based program is housed in the University of Pyithu Hluttaw (the People’s Parliament) and policy making, enhancing political awareness Washington's Henry M. Jackson School of shared the report to all stakeholders and the and participation for citizens and CSOs through International Studies and is run in collaboration public. Currently, EMReF has been regularly providing reliable and trustworthy information with the Technology & Social Change Group collecting some important data and information on political parties and elections, parliamentary (TASCHA) in the University of Washington’s on the elections and political parties. performances, and essential development Information School, and two partner policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Queries Raised and Replied, Proposal Submitted, Approval Sought
    Established 1914 Volume XVIII, Number 338 6th Waning of Tabaung 1372 ME Friday, 25 March, 2011 Root cause of splits The root causes that underlay the rise of fractious sectarianism and the proliferation of splits are found to be the incentives that the colonialists provided to expand their sphere of influence, the wedges of instigation and incitement that they drove in a wellplanned manner among colleagues, the arrogance born of overestimating oneself, personal rivalries and underestimating others, jealousies, suspicions and grudges. Some parties looked to foreign countries for guidance and inspiration, followed the imported ideologies and directives irrationally under foreign influence and carried out purges against fellow party members, which inevitably led to their demise. There were also many others that brought misery on themselves by aping the practices of countries with divergent development and dissimilar backgrounds. Senior General Than Shwe Chairman of the State Peace and Development Council Commander-in-Chief of Defence Services (From speech delivered at the parade of 64th Anniversary Armed Forces Day) Senior General Than Shwe sends Four political objectives * Stability of the State, community peace and tranquil- lity, prevalence of law and order * National reconsolidation felicitations to President of Hellenic Republic * Emergence of a new enduring State Constitution * Building of a new modern developed nation in accord NAY P YI T AW, 25 March—Senior General Than Shwe, Chairman of the State Peace and with the new State Constitution Development Council of the Union of Myanmar, has sent a message of felicitations to His Four economic objectives Excellency Mr. Karolos Papoulias, President of the Hellenic Republic, on the occasion of the * Development of agriculture as the base and all-round devel- opment of other sectors of the economy as well National Day of the Hellenic Republic, which falls on 25 March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Q&A on Elections in BURMA
    Q&A ON ELECTIONS IN BURMA PHOTOGRapHS BY PLATON Q&A ON ELECTIONS IN BuRma INTRODUCTION PHOTOGRapHS BY PLATON Burma will hold multi-party elections on November 7, 2010, the first in 20 years. Some contend the elections could spark a gradual process of democratization and the opening of civil society space in Burma. Human Rights Watch believes that the elections must be seen in the context of the Burmese military government’s carefully manufactured electoral process over many years that is designed to ensure continued military rule, albeit with a civilian façade. The generals’ “Road Map to Disciplined Democracy” has been a path filled with human rights violations: the brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters in 2007, the doubling of the number of political prisoners in Burma since then to more than 2000, the marginalization of WIN MIN, CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER ethnic minority communities in border areas, a rewritten constitution that A medical student at the time, Win undermines rights and guarantees continued military rule, and carefully Min became a leader of the 1988 constructed electoral laws that subtly bar the main opposition candidates. pro-democracy demonstrations in Burma. After years fighting in the jungle, Win Min has become one of the This political repression takes place in an environment that already sharply restricts most articulate intellectuals in exile. freedom of association, assembly, and expression. Burma’s media is tightly controlled Educated at Harvard University, he is by the authorities, and many media outlets trying to report on the elections have been now one of the driving forces behind an innovative collective called the Vahu (in reduced to reporting on official announcements’ and interviews with party leaders: no Burmese: Plural) Development Institute, public opinion or opposition is permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Political Parties and Religion in Myanmar Kristian
    Political parties and religion in Myanmar Kristian Stokke Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo Myanmar is characterized by a puzzling paradox when it comes to the relationship between religions and political parties: While religions, especially Theravada Buddhism, are omnipresent in society and frame politics in multiple and contentious ways, the reintroduction of electoral politics has not been followed by the formation of religious parties or major party- driven politicisation of religious identities and interests. Although religious beliefs and belongings are parts of politics in a broad sense, the links between religions and political parties seem relatively weak and are difficult to discern. Myanmar is a multi-ethnic country that officially recognises eight ‘national races’: Bamar, Chin, Kachin, Kayah (Karenni), Kayin (Karen), Mon, Rakhine (Arakan) and Shan. Bamar comprise approximately two thirds of the population. The Union of Myanmar is territorially organised in seven Bamar-dominated regions in the central parts of the country and seven ethnic states along Myanmar’s borders (Figure 1). Myanmar is also a multi-religious country where the large majority are identified as Buddhist, but there are also important Christian, Muslim and Hindu minorities, and some of these are prominent in particular areas (Carstens, 2018; Fink, 2018). Whereas Buddhism is the dominant religion and has fundamentally shaped Myanmar’s cultural and political history, Islam has also had a long history in the country and Christianity is a major religion among ethnic nationalities (especially Chin, Kayah, Kachin and Kayin) (Gravers & Ytzen, 2014). Animist traditions and worship of nat spirits and Hindu gods are also common, including as part of Buddhism.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier Capitalism and Politics of Dispossession in Myanmar: the Case of the Mwetaung (Gullu Mual) Nickel Mine in Chin State Einzenberger, Rainer
    www.ssoar.info Frontier Capitalism and Politics of Dispossession in Myanmar: the Case of the Mwetaung (Gullu Mual) Nickel Mine in Chin State Einzenberger, Rainer Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Einzenberger, R. (2018). Frontier Capitalism and Politics of Dispossession in Myanmar: the Case of the Mwetaung (Gullu Mual) Nickel Mine in Chin State. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 11(1), 13-34. https:// doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2018.1-2 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de Aktuelle Südostasienforschung Current Research on Southeast Asia Frontier Capitalism and Politics of Dispossession in Myanmar: The Case of the Mwetaung (Gullu Mual) Nickel Mine in Chin State Rainer Einzenberger ► Einzenberger, R. (2018). Frontier capitalism and politics of dispossession in Myanmar: The case of the Mwetaung (Gullu Mual) nickel mine in Chin State. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 11(1), 13-34. Since 2010, Myanmar has experienced unprecedented political and economic changes described in the literature as democratic transition or metamorphosis. The aim of this paper is to analyze the strategy of accumulation by dispossession in the frontier areas as a precondition and persistent element of Myanmar’s transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Political Prisoners and U.S. Sanctions
    Burma’s Political Prisoners and U.S. Sanctions Michael F. Martin Specialist in Asian Affairs September 15, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42363 c11173008 . Burma’s Political Prisoners and U.S. Sanctions Summary The release of all Burma’s political prisoners is one of the fundamental goals of U.S. policy. Several of the laws imposing sanctions on Burma—including the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-61) and the Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE (Junta’s Anti- Democratic Efforts) Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-286)—require the release of all political prisoners before the sanctions can be terminated. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014 (P.L. 113- 76) requires the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to “support programs for former political prisoners” in Burma, as well as “monitor the number of political prisoners in Burma.” Burma’s President Thein Sein pledged during a July 2013 trip to the United Kingdom to release all “prisoners of conscience” in his country by the end of the year. Since his announcement, he granted amnesties or pardons on seven occasions. While President Thein Sein has asserted that all political prisoners have been freed, several Burmese organizations maintain that dozens of political prisoners remain in jail and that new political prisoners continue to be arrested and sentenced. Hopes for a democratic government and national reconciliation in Burma depend on the release of prisoners, including those associated with the country’s ethnic groups. Several ethnic-based political parties have stated they will not participate in parliamentary elections until their members are released.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Politics and the 2015 Elections in Myanmar
    MYANMAR POLICY BRIEFING | 16 | September 2015 Ethnic Politics and the 2015 Elections in Myanmar RECOMMENDATIONS • The 2015 general election presents an important opportunity to give political voice to Myanmar’s diverse ethnic nationality communities and empower them to pursue their aspirations, provided that it is genuinely free and fair. • If successfully held, the general election is likely to mark another key step in the process of national transition from decades of military rule. However the achievement of nationwide peace and further constitutional reform are still needed to guarantee the democratic rights, representation and participation of all peoples in determining the country’s future. • Although nationality parties are likely to win many seats in the polls, the impact of identity politics and vote-splitting along ethnic and party lines may see electoral success falling short of expectations. This can be addressed through political cooperation and reform. It is essential for peace and stability that the democratic process offers real hope to nationality communities that they can have greater control over their destiny. • Inequitable distribution of political and economic rights has long driven mistrust and conflict in Myanmar. The 2015 general election must mark a new era of political inclusion, not division, in national politics. After the elections, it is vital that an inclusive political dialogue moves forward at the national level to unite parliamentary processes and ethnic ceasefire talks as a political roadmap for all citizens. ideas into movement Introduction Myanmar/Burma1 is heading to the polls in November 2015, in what will be a closely watched election. Provided that they are free and fair, the polls are likely to have a major influence over the future political direction of the country, with an expected shift in power from the old elite to the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Reporting on Elections
    Reporting on Elections: A Toolkit for Journalists in Myanmar i Reporting on Elections: A Toolkit for Journalists in Myanmar ISBN: 978-616-8264-09-6 Written by: John Reiner M. Antiquerra Tharindu Abeyrathna Zayar Hlaing Layout cover designed by: Inspiral Creative Produced and Published By: The Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) 105 Sutthisan Winnichai Rd., Samsennok, Huai Khwang, Bangkok 10310, Thailand Tel: (+66 2) 26931867 Email: [email protected] Website: www.anfrel.org © 2020 by ANFREL Foundation The contents of this toolkit may be used for training and educational purposes only. Any reproduction of this publication must acknowledge that the copyright is held by ANFREL Foundation. The publication of this toolkit is made possible through the generous support of the Canadian Embassy in Yangon and the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. ii Reporting on Elections: A Toolkit for Journalists in Myanmar Contents Foreword ..........................................................................................................................iv .....................................................vi 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................1 Abbreviation and Myanmar Specific Terms 2. Elections ....................................................................................................................4 2.1. History of Elections in Myanmar ...........................................................4 2.2. Myanmar Electoral System .......................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Common Ground
    EBO Background Paper No.5 | 2019 September 2019 AUTHOR | Paul Keenan Finding Common Ground Ethnic Political Parties and the 2020 elections As Myanmar moves towards the 2020 election, ethnic political parties now, more than ever, need to work together and find common ground if they ever want to influence the future politics of the country and ensure ethnic equality. Minority ethnic groups make up a third of the country's 51.5 million people.1 Currently, ethnic politics can be defined as consisting of five main actors: merged ethnic political parties, the NCA non-signatory armed ethnic groups, NCA signatory groups, the Nationalities Brotherhood Forum (NBF), and the United Nationalities Alliance (UNA). All of these groups have divergent interests and it is these interests that may weaken ethnic policymaking in the future. While all groups profess a singular goal – ethnic equality and a genuine federal union, it is how they work together, if they can, that will ultimately decide the future of ethnic representation in the country after the 2020 election. One of the main ethnic alliance is the United Nationalities Alliance which was formed after the 1990 election and was considered one of the most influential and experienced political alliances operating in the country.2 The UNA encompassed a varied spectrum of ethnic political parties, dominated by the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy (SNLD), which had contested and won seats in the 1990 general election. Originally, in the UNA there were 12 different political parties. Today, there
    [Show full text]
  • FIDH Report Half Empty: Burma's Political Parties and Their Human Rights Commitments
    Half Empty: Burma’s political parties and their human rights commitments November 2015 / N°668a November © AFP PHOTO / Soe Than Win MPs attend parliamentary session in Naypyidaw on July 4, 2012. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Foreword 4 2. Executive summary 4 3. Methodology 5 4. Outgoing Parliament disappoints on human rights 7 11 5.1 - Media freedom 12 5.2 - Religious discrimination 12 5.3 - Role of the military 13 5.4 - Accountability for past crimes 13 5.5 - Legislative reform 14 5.6 - Women’s rights 14 5.7 - Death penalty 14 5.8 - Ethnic minority rights 15 15 5.10 - Human rights defenders 15 5.11 - Investment, development, and infrastructure projects 16 5.12 - Next government’s top priorities 16 6. Recommendations to elected MPs 17 7. Appendixes 20 7.1 - Appendix 1: Survey’s complete results 20 7.2 - Appendix 2: Political parties contesting the 8 November election 25 1. FOREWORD By Tomás Ojea Quintana, former UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar to visit the new Parliament in Myanmar, I was able to economic course. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Suu Kyi, is expected to win. 1 Burma Issues & Concerns Vol. 6: The generals’ election, January 2011 4 FIDH - HALF EMPTY: BURMA’S POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENTS concerns. The report provides numerous recommendations to MPs, based on statements and reports issued by various UN special procedures as well as resolutions adopted by 3. METHODOLOGY [See Appendix 2: Political parties contesting the 8 November election Appendix 1: Survey’s complete results FIDH - HALF EMPTY: BURMA’S POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENTS 5 6 FIDH - HALF EMPTY: BURMA’S POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENTS 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 07 N Ganesan DOI.Indd
    Asian Journal of Peacebuilding Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): 273-286 doi: 10.18588/201511.000046 Field Note Ethnic Insurgency and the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement in Myanmar N. Ganesan On October 15, 2015, the government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar signed a Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) with eight of the sixteen ethnic armed groups it had been negotiating with. The aim of the Thein Sein government had been to sign the agreement with all sixteen groups, but this was not realized. One reason why eight of the groups have been left out is the ongoing fighting between the Myanmar military and some of the groups, and the army’s unwillingness to involve them in the ceasefire process. Similarly, some of the ethnic armed groups have also indicated that they are unwilling, or not ready, to sign the NCA at this time. Keywords Myanmar politics, Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, Myanmar Peace Center, ethnic insurgent groups, Myanmar military Introduction The Myanmar government concluded a Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) on October 15 with eight of the country’s sixteen ethnic armed groups that it had engaged through the Nationwide Ceasefire Coordination Team (NCCT). This is one of the most important political steps taken since 2010 by the Thein Sein-led government. Other important developments include institutionalization of the ceasefire process through the inauguration of the Myanmar Peace Center. There are, however, a number of challenges facing the inclusion of all the ethnic armed groups in this process. The ongoing conflict with some of the groups, the army’s unwillingness to include certain groups, the shifting position of the ethnic groups and the large number of organizations claiming to collectively represent them, and the relative independence of some of the groups all constitute barriers to their full inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Monitor No.22
    Euro-Burma Office 15 - 28 August 2015 Political Monitor 2015 POLITICAL MONITOR NO. 22 OFFICIAL MEDIA A MILESTONE IN THE MYANMAR PEACE PROCESS— THE NATIONWIDE CEASEFIRE AGREEMENT On 7 August 2015, the Union Government, Hluttaw, Tatmadaw, and Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) achieved a milestone in the peace process by finalizing the text of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA). President Thein Sein formally sent invitations to 15 Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) on 18 August, 2015, to sign the NCA. Over the last 4 years, the Government held separate talks with each of the 15 EAOs and bilateral agreements were concluded. In total, 39 agreements at the state and union levels were signed. The Government accepted the request of the EAOs to organize meetings among themselves, and provided assistance for the holding of ethnic leaders summits. The Government also agreed to discuss proposals for the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement that resulted from these summits. The Union Peace-Making Work Committee (UPWC) composed of representatives from the Government, Hluttaw, and Tatmadaw, and the Ethnic Armed Organizations’ Nationwide Ceasefire Coordination Team (NCCT) met over a 17-month period to finalize a mutually acceptable Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement. Talks began in early November 2013, and on 31 March, 2015, the draft text of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, comprising 7 chapters and 33 paragraphs, was finalized. Although the government was ready to sign the Agreement, leaders of Ethnic Armed Organizations formed the Senior Delegation (SD) and requested amendments to the text of the Agreement. In the interest of achieving nationwide peace, the Government resumed negotiations, and on 7 August, 2015, all provisions of the Agreement were finalized.1 UEC ANNOUNCES PRELIMINARY CANDIDATE LISTS The country’s 2 main political parties — the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party and the opposition National League for Democracy — will each field more than 1,000 candidates in the 8 November general election.
    [Show full text]