Non binding translation 6.4 SceneryFor and convenience leisure only Scenic beauty and leisure environment surveys for this project were carried out in August 2016 and May 2017. The survey results were similar and there was not much change in the overall environment. Photos of scenic spots from the two surveys are shown in Figure 6.4-1.

Provincial Highway 61 at the estuary of Provincial Highway 61 at the estuary of Old Huwei River (2016.08.18) Old Huwei River (2017.05.06)

Santiaolun Fishing Harbor (2016.08.18) Santiaolun Fishing Harbor (2017.05.06)

Shoal south of Santiaolun Fishing Harbor Shoal south of Santiaolun Fishing Harbor (2016.08.18) (2016.05.06) Figure 6.4-1 Photos of the project's scenic spots taken during surveys in 2016 and 2017

6-312 Non binding translation For convenience only

Observation platform on the western Observation platform on the western embankment of Gangxi Village embankment of Gangxi Village (2016.08.18) (2017.05.06)

On the Aogu Wetland embankment On the Aogu Wetland embankment (2016.08.18) (2017.05.06)

Dongshih Fisherman's Wharf (2016.08.18) Dongshih Fisherman's Wharf (2017.05.06) Figure 6.4-1 Photos of the project's scenic spots taken during surveys in 2016 and 2017 (continued) 6.4.1 Environmental scenic beauty

I. Survey and analysis of the current development site scenic beauty status

The wind farm is located off the coasts of Sihu and Township, . Provincial Highways 17 and 61 (Western Coast Expressway) and County Roadways 155, 160, 164, and 166 are the main traffic access ways along the coast of Yunlin and Chiayi. Lands along the coastal area are mostly used by fish farms, fishing harbors, rivers, wetland, farmlands, and residential

6-313 Non binding translation homes. Townships are densely developed with frequent human activity and traffic.For The coastalconvenience area consists mostly of windbreak only forests, fish farms, wetlands, sand banks and fishing harbors. It offers abundant scenery resource in the form of natural environments, ecology, weather, and industry. Small settlements are scattered around the area but have relatively little human activity.

The wind farm of this project is over 8 km off the coast and involves sea cable and land cable constructions. The goal of this project is to promote the use of renewable energy, increase energy diversity, improve environmental quality, stimulate the related industries in nearby areas, and promote sustainable national development.

II. Establishing the area for evaluating the impact of development activities on scenic beauty

According to the Technical Specifications for Scenic Beauty Assessment of Environmental Impact Assessment (draft) of the Environmental Protection Administration, a scenic beauty assessment must be conducted for the development area plus a 1,200 meter radius. This development project, however, is about 8 km offshore and the area covered by a 1.2 km radius is still offshore. Hence, the area assessed for this project is the coastal area west of Provincial Highways 17 and 61, where the wind turbines can still be seen and may potentially affect surrounding residents and visitors, as shown in Figure 6.4.1- 1.

III. Landscape Resources Survey

The project site is located offshore of Yunlin County. Aside from agricultural settlements, surrounding areas mainly consist of large fish farms, oyster farms, and farmlands. Due to the low volume of artificial facilities, the area is rich with an ecological landscape of animals and plants, as well as the meteorological landscape of the setting sun, both simple scenery of coastal areas. Characteristics of scenery in the project area are described below:

(I) Key natural sceneries

1. Geographical landscapes

The coastal area of Yunlin and Chiayi contains large wetlands, windbreak forests, fish farms, and farmlands, and is adjacent to the Strait to the west. The area is mainly formed by an alluvial plain, tidal land, and

6-314 Non binding translation offshore sand banks. The area is relatively flat with an average altitude Forbelow 10convenience m and mainly offers the scenery of a coastal only plain. The project area mainly has straight coastlines with sandy beaches; due to the interaction between wind, tide, and waves, the estuary sand accretion gradually rising outward, forming a natural tidal land or sand bank, including Boziliaoshan, Tongshanzhou, and Waisandingzhou. These form a semi-closed sea area with the island of Taiwan, forming a special geographic scenery in the area. , Xinhuwei River, Huwei River, Niutaowan River, and Beigang River are the main rivers passing through this area, which means that, along with the vast to the west, there are abundant hydrological resources.

Figure 6.4.1-1 Area surveyed for landscape of development activity

6-315 Non binding translation 2. Geological landscape ForThis area convenience is a coastal plain that is part of the Holocene only alluvium, which is mainly formed by sand, silty sand, and mud. The unconsolidated sediments are interlayered with marine deposits. Sand is mainly distributed in the river courses and estuaries, and offshore sand banks are mainly formed by medium to fine sand sediments from the late Holocene to present day. The soil is wind-deposited sediments, mostly sandy soil and sandy loam. The soil has high salinity due to seawater intrusion from the Taiwan Strait to the west. Overall, this area does not have any special geological scenery.

3. Sceneries of plants and animals

It is hard for vegetation to grow in the coastal area due to strong winds and the salinity of seawater. There are relatively diverse and dense vegetation in nearby campuses and communities. Otherwise, large plants are generally lacking, and the windbreak forest is mainly Casuarina equisetifolia.

Aogu Wetland is a coastal wetland that serves as a buffer zone between land and sea. The plant ecology is characterized by plants which are wind and drought resistance, psammophytes, halophytes, and mangrove. The windbreak forest is mainly Casuarina equisetifolia and Hibiscus tiliaceus. Psammophytes mainly include Ipomoea pes-caprae, Operculina turpethum, Canavalia rosea, Atriplex maximowicziana, and Phyla nodiflora. Halophytes mainly include Suaeda maritima, Sesuvium portulacastrum, Paspalum vaginatum, and Sporobolus virginicus. Mangrove mainly consists of Lumnitzera racemosa and Avicennia marina. There is a relative abundance of plant sceneries.

As for sceneries of animals, the continental shelf along the coastal area is flat with a gentle slope, and has abundant marine biology as it provides an ideal habitat for fish to reproduce. Species found on the tidal flat and wetlands have the most distinguishing features, in which the majority are birds and fish, while mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and butterflies are rare. The project area mainly consists of fish farms, most of which farm oysters, and only Egretta garzetta, Pycnonotus sinensis, and Acridotheres cristatellus are found in the area. Many wild birds gather near Xinhuwei River Estuary, which is a relatively sensitive habitat. A large wetland

6-316 Non binding translation formed between the estuaries of Niutaowan River and Beigang River due Forto the largeconvenience hinterland. Chenglung Wetland, Yiwu only Wetland, and Aogu Wetland have abundant fish, shrimp, and shellfish, making them suitable habitats for water birds. Dozens of species have been sighted in the wetlands, including Ciconia boyciana, Elanus caeruleus, Bubulcus ibis, Ixobrychus sinensis, Centropus bengalensis, Himantopus himantopus, Gallinula chloropus, Tachybaptus ruficollis, Alcedo atthis, Gallinago gallinago, and Rostratula benghalensis. These are important national wetlands, where bird watching areas and wetland ecological protected areas have been planned.

4. Visual scenery

Areas around the project site have relatively good landscape resources as they mainly contain natural landscape elements, such as sand banks, wetlands, ocean, animal and plant ecology, and sunsets, see Figure 6.4.1- 2 for photos of the current environment.

(II) Main artificial and cultural scenic elements

Traditional architecture in the area is rarely preserved. Other than temples with local features, such as Kongfan Temple, Taixi Anxi Temple, Sihu Haiqing Temple, Kouhu Wanshanye Temple, and Dongshi Xiantian Temple, no important historic sites or relics were found in the area. Farmers in Yunlin County converting their farmland into fish farms has been common in recent years. Coastal fishery activities are mainly hard clam cultivation and eel gathering. There are many small fishing villages and wind turbines scattered in nearby areas. The Western Coast Expressway passes through the west side of Yunlin County. The frequent human activity and traffic forms a special coastal scenery and artificial scenery of fishing villages. The overall scenic quality is still quite good (Figure 6.4.1-3).

(III) Distinctive scenic elements

Yunlin is located on the alluvial plain on the west coast of Taiwan and has a subtropical monsoon climate. Coastal areas have relatively little rainfall, which is concentrated in May to July. Winter is dry with strong monsoons. There are many storm days and sandstorms, which cover the sky with black and gray sand when severe. The coastal areas of Yunlin and Chiayi offer a broad view of special scenic elements along the coastline. The distinctive

6-317 Non binding translation climate condition here makes blue skies, seas and sun a pleasant coastal Forscenery, and convenience the sunset at evening hours is an especially only unique sight in this area (Figure 6.4.1-4).

Flat alluvial plain Broad view of Taiwan Strait

Large windbreak forest of Casuarina Offshore sand bank equisetifolia

Abundance of ecological resources Diverse ecological scenery in Aogu Wetland Figure 6.4.1-2 Photos of natural scenery

6-318 Non binding translation For convenience only

Scenery of religious temple architecture Huge turbine as visual focus

Many fishing harbors are distributed along The main industrial scenery is large fish the coast farms

Oyster shells are a special industrial scenery Dongshih Fisherman's Wharf is an important in the area recreation area Figure 6.4.1-3 Photos of artificial scenery

6-319 Non binding translation For convenience only

The sunset glow is a special meteorological Boundless sea and sky is a special visual scenery scenery of this area Figure 6.4.1-4 Distinctive scenic elements 6.4.2 Leisure environment I. Analysis of tourism resource

The recreational impact survey was conducted mainly on scenic spots within 30 minutes driving distance of this project's wind turbines. Besides sand banks and temple architecture in the coastal area, there are relatively few geomorphic and geographic sceneries or cultural sceneries that stand out. Fish farm scenery is a feature of this area. Scenic spots that have been developed along the coastal area include: Estuary landscape park, bicycle paths, Xingang green park, and Linhai park. These provide local residents with places for exercise, recreation, and sightseeing, but there are few visitors due to their remote location. Temples with local features, such as Mailiao Kongfan Temple, Taixi Anxi Temple, Sihu Haiqing Temple, and Dongshi Xiantian Temple, are more able to attract local residents, visitors, and believers. The sandy beach along the coast is only utilized at Santiaolun Beach, and theme parks include Taixi Estuary Park and Wushui Garden. Development has been limited, however, due to the locations being somewhat remote and recreation not in high demand in this area, as well as the limited scale of facilities.

The Southwest Coast National Scenic Area starts from Niutaowan River in Yunlin County to the north and reaches Yenshui River in City to the south; it borders Provincial Highway 17 to the east. There many scenic spots and an abundance of tourism resources, giving it great potential for developing coastal recreation.

6-320 Non binding translation Judging by traffic and leisure activities in the area, tourists are mainly locals and residentsFor from conveniencenearby cities. Due to close proximity to theonly tourist attractions, leisure activities are mostly planned as half-day or one-day trips. The complete facilities offered by Dongshih Fisherman's Wharf and large scale events organized by Government each year attract many tourists, who typically travel in their own vehicles and on large tour buses.

II. Survey and description of nearby tourist attractions

Main traffic routes around the project area include Provincial Highway 17, Provincial Highway 61 (West Coast Expressway), County Route 160, and County Route 164. Some scenic spots are by the sea and offer a vast view. The offshore wind turbines are clearly visible during good weather and have a considerable visual effect. The accessibility of scenic spots may be negatively impacted by construction vehicles during the construction period. We have shortlisted several local tourist attractions (Figure 6.4.2-1) that may be subject to such impacts. Descriptions of the shortlisted attractions are as follows:

(I) Mailiao Kongfan Temple

Kongfan Temple is located in Mailiao Maifeng Village and was built in the 24th year of Kangxi during the Qing Dynasty (1685). The temple is over 300 years old and is mainly dedicated to Tianshang Shengmu, or more commonly known as "Kaishan Mazu." The temple contains a considerable amount of historic relics, endless streams of pilgrims and features exquisite clay art and its religious architecture. It has many believers and is one of the top four temples in Yunlin along with Beigang Chaotien Temple, Taixi Anxi Temple, and Baozhong Mamingshan Zhenan Temple. It is currently listed as a national historic monument. Many tourists and believers visit the temple during the Mazu's birthday on the 23rd day of the 3rd month of the lunar calendar.

(II) Anxi Temple

Anxi Temple is located next to Provincial Highway 17 in Taixi Township. The temple was originally built on Haifeng Island (now Waishandingzhou) in the 60th year of Emporer Qianlong (1759) during the Qing Dynasty, and was relocated to its current location in Wugang Village, Yunlin County in the 11th year of Emperor Jiaqing (1806) during the Qing Dynasty. It is modern Taiwanese temple architecture in a coastal area that offers sacrifices

6-321 Non binding translation to Zhangxun (Zhangfu Qiansui), Limi (Lifu Qiansui), and Moying (Mofu ForQiansui) ofconvenience the Tang Dynasty, jointly referred to as onlythe Zhang-Li-Mo Fu San Qiansui. It is an important temple to Daoism in Taiwan and folk belief, making it a famous tourist attraction in the area.

(III) Taixi Estuary Park

Taixi Estuary Park is located on the west coast of Taixi Township, Yunlin County, facing the Taiwan Strait. It is a themed tourist attraction built on reclaimed land in Taixi, and is suitable for farming due to the sandy soil. In addition to fish farms, visitors can also admire the large Brassica campestris fields, coastal oyster farms, and sunset scenery. The park has an Estuary Life Hall, which offers holiday movies, cultural creativity, fishermen experience, and art activities, and displays ancient agriculture and fishing tools and oyster shell artworks, providing a new location for in-depth travel and mini cultural creativity in Taixi Township.

(IV) Santiaolun Beach Waterfront Park

Santiaolun Beach Waterfront Park was originally Santiaolun Beach. Currently, only a small park and forest area is open to the public. The park contains an abundance of natural and industrial sceneries of the ocean, beach, oyster racks, and windbreak forest. The park is surrounded by a windbreak forest and has well preserved ecology. It is one of the most completely preserved coastal areas in Central Taiwan, but was closed for numerous years due to issues with land ownership and poor operation, resulting in extremely few visitors.

(V) Sihu Haiqing Temple (Baogong Temple)

Haiqing Temple is located on the coast of Santiaolun, Yunlin County, and is mainly dedicated to the famous Northern Song Dynasty official Bao Zheng. It is the first Baogong Temple in Taiwan built in 1738, about 270 years ago. All building structures in the front hall were too old and replaced in 1991 using the mortise and tenon connection method, building a traditional Southern Fujian style five gate temple, a magnificent building with exquisite carvings representative of Taiwan's temple art. The 10th day of the 7th month of the lunar calendar is the birthday of Yanluowang, and spirits and believers around Taiwan will return to the temple. It is one of the most popular religious tourism attractions in the coastal area.

6-322 Non binding translation (VI) Estuary Story Park ForThe Estuary convenience Story Park offers estuary scenery andonly industrial culture experiences. Water is the core element of its spatial planning, and surrounding areas include a camping zone, environmental education zone, stargazing hill and walking path. Visitors can experience nature, sunset scenery, and local tourism activities. The park is an important tourist attraction on the coast of Kouhu Township, but there are not many visitors due to the lack of proper management after the agriculture expo ended.

(VII) Southwest Coast National Scenic Area

The Southwest Coast National Scenic Area contains tourism resources of Yunlin, Chiayi, and Tainan. Its main ecological feature is the wetland ecosystem, and offers natural scenery of ponds, paddy fields, salt fields, estuary marsh, coastal sand banks, lagoons, and tidal flat, and special industrial scenery of cultural, agriculture, fishery, and salt industries. It is the 12th national scenic area in Taiwan and attracts many visitors.

Horseshoe Clam Ecological Park developed artificial breeding for the restoration of Geloina erosa, a native species of Taiwan. In addition to aquaculture, Mr. Tseng Chieh-Chung also began developing the leisure industry and established Horseshoe Clam Ecological Park in 2005. The park planned an entrance image, horseshoe clam touching experience pond, rubber raft experience, fort observation platform, clam shell DIY, and specialty restaurant. It is a new tourist attraction on the coast of Yunlin.

Chenglong Wetland, Yiwu Wetland, and Aogu Wetland are located on the south side of the project area and have an abundance of precious ecological resources. The most common birds are from the families Ardeidae, Anatidae, and Scolopacidae, while Sterna albifrons, Larus saundersi, Falco tinnunculus, Ciconia boyciana, Elanus caeruleus, Bubulcus ibis, Ixobrychus sinensis, Centropus bengalensis, Himantopus himantopus, Gallinula chloropus, Tachybaptus ruficollis, Alcedo atthis, Gallinago gallinago, and Rostratula benghalensis have also been sighted, in which Lanius cristatus, Platalea minor, Ciconia boyciana, Glareola maldivarus, Rostratula benghalensis, Larus saundersi, and Elanus caeruleus are rare and valuable species that are endangered and should be protected. Plants that have been discovered include plants that are in the families Gramineae,

6-323 Non binding translation Scrophulariaceae, and Rubiaceae, which form the scenery of the wetland Formarsh, and convenience there are also rare plants such as Bolboschoenus only planiculmis. (VIII) Dongshih Fisherman's Wharf

Dongshih Fisherman's Wharf was planned with the elements of wind, sunlight, fish, ships, ocean, and lighthouse, presenting an ocean scene that has reshaped the image of Dongshih Fisherman's Wharf with a Dutch style entrance. In addition to fresh seafood and beautiful sunsets, it has created a special image with harbor scenery, cultural features, leisure and recreation, and natural ecological resources. Main facilities include a marine culture museum, specialty shops, shopping street, observation deck, floating bridge market, and seaside promenade, providing a variety of services, including boat rides, scenery, waterfront activities, sports, and cuisine. Chiayi County Government has organized the Sea Summer Festival for numerous years. Besides musical performances, the festival also offers a variety of activities such as volleyball, handball, picnics, and escape rooms. It is a tourist attraction with distinguishing features that has attracted many tourists, mainly traveling by their own vehicles and large tour buses.

6-324 Non binding translation For convenience only

Figure 6.4.2-1 Tourism analysis

6-325 Non binding translation 6.5 SocialFor and convenience economic environment only 6.5.1 Population and age structure

I. Population

The population of Yunlin County decreased from 728,490 in 2006 to 699,633 in 2015, by a total of 28,857. Population density of the county decreased from 564.36 people per square kilometer in 2006 to 542.00 people per square kilometer in 2015, down 22.36 people per square kilometer.

The population of Taixi Township was 24,576 in 2015, which was equivalent to a population density of 454.28 people per square kilometer. The population of Sihu Township was 24,742 in 2015, which was equivalent to a population density of 320.83 people per square kilometer. The population of Kouhu Township was 28,489 in 2015, which was equivalent to a population density of 354.07 people per square kilometer.

II. Age structure

Age structure can be analyzed using the three stages of life. Stage 1 represents age 0 – 14, and comprises young children and dependents; Stage 2 represents age 15 – 64, and comprises adults and the productive population; Stage 3 represents age 65 and above, and comprises the senior population or dependents.

In 2015, young children aged 0 – 14 accounted for 12.56% of Yunlin County's population, whereas the adult population accounted for 70.97% and the senior population accounted for another 16.47%. Dependency ratio for the city was calculated at 40.90. Yunlin County is an area with a mainly adult population. An analysis of age structure in Yunlin County has been presented in Table 6.5.1-1. Based on statistics in the last 10 years, the aging index had increased from 81.35 in 2006 to 131.10 in 2014, which indicated a trend of an aging population.

In 2015, young children aged 0 – 14 accounted for 9.87% (2,426 people) of Taixi Township's population, whereas the adult population accounted for 72.00% (17,694 people) and the senior population accounted for another 18.13% (4,456 people). Dependency ratio for the district was calculated at 38.89 and the aging index at 183.68, which indicated significant aging of the population.

In 2015, young children aged 0 – 14 accounted for 8.67% (2,145 people) of Sihu Township's population, whereas the adult population accounted for 70.78% (17,512 people) and the senior population accounted for another 20.55% (5,085

6-326 Non binding translation people). Dependency ratio for the district was calculated at 41.29 and the aging indexFor at 237.06, convenience which indicated significant aging of the population.only In 2015, young children aged 0 – 14 accounted for 10.19% (2,902 people) of Kouhu Township's population, whereas the adult population accounted for 72.00% (20,511 people) and the senior population accounted for another 17.82% (5,076 people). Dependency ratio for the district was calculated at 38.90 and the aging index at 174.91, which indicated significant aging of the population.

III. Education

By the end of 2015, 30.96% (189,419 people) of 611,749 people aged 15 and above in Yunlin County had completed tertiary education and above (including postgraduate program, university, independent college, and diploma); 29.01% (177,489 people) had completed high school (vocational high school); 16.78% (102,658 people) had completed junior high school (vocational junior high school); 19.45% (118,983 people) had completed elementary school; 0.38% (2,319 people) self-studied; and 3.41% (20,881 people) were illiterate. As at the end of this year, people who had completed high school (vocational high school) education and above accounted for 59.98% of the population aged 15 and above in this county.

By the end of 2015, high school (vocational high school) education represented the highest percentage of existing residents aged 15 and above in Taixi Township, totaling 5,510 people (about 24.88%); the next largest education groups were: elementary school - 5,350 people (about 24.15%), junior high school - 4,736 people (about 21.38%), tertiary - 4,465 people (about 20.16%), illiterate - 1,570 people (about 7.09%), and masters/doctorate degree - 519 people (about 2.34%).

By the end of 2015, high school (vocational high school) education represented the highest percentage of existing residents aged 15 and above in Sihu Township, totaling 5,923 people (about 26.21%); the next largest education groups were: elementary school - 5,117 people (about 22.22%), junior high school - 4,927 people (about 21.80%), tertiary - 4,216 people (about 18.66%), illiterate - 2,092 people (about 9.26%), and masters/doctorate degree - 521 people (about 2.31%).

By the end of 2015, high school (vocational high school) education represented the highest percentage of existing residents aged 15 and above in Kouhu

6-327 Non binding translation Township, totaling 6,840 people (about 26.73%); the next largest education groupsFor were: elementaryconvenience school - 5847 people (about 22.85%),only junior high school - 5,244 people (about 20.49%), tertiary - 5072 people (about 19.82%), illiterate - 2,089 people (about 8.16%), and masters/doctorate degree - 495 people (about 1.93%).

6-328 Non binding translation Table 6.5.1-1 Age distribution of Yunlin County population

Item (1) Age 0–14 (2) Age 15–64 (3) Age 65 and above Dependency For convenience only Aging ratio index Population Percentage Population Percentage Population Percentage (3) (1) (3) 100 100 (1) Year (2) 2006 126,430 17.36% 499,211 68.53% 102,849 14.12% 45.93 81.35 2007 122,552 16.89% 498,423 68.68% 104,697 14.43% 45.59 85.43 2008 118,586 16.39% 498,526 68.89% 106,562 14.73% 45.16 89.86 2009 114,284 15.81% 500,746 69.28% 107,765 14.91% 44.34 94.30 2010 108,902 15.17% 500,790 69.78% 107,961 15.04% 43.30 99.14 2011 104,065 14.58% 500,477 70.14% 109,014 15.28% 42.58 104.76 2012 100,058 14.07% 500,769 70.43% 110,164 15.49% 41.98 110.10 2013 96,513 13.64% 499,650 70.59% 111,629 15.77% 41.66 115.66 2014 92,845 13.16% 498,976 70.74% 113,535 16.10% 41.36 122.28 2015 87,884 12.56% 496,535 70.97% 115,214 16.47% 40.90 131.10 Note: 1. Source: "2015 Yunlin County Annual Report" by Yunlin County Government.

6.5.2 Industry structure

I. Size of workforce

The workforce refers to the population aged 15 and above who have both the ability and willingness to work for compensation. At the end of 2015, Yunlin County had approximately 603,000 people aged 15 and above; about 310,000 of whom were male and 294,000 of whom were female. The size of workforce was reported at 353,000; 211,000 or 59.77% of whom were male and 142,000 or 40.23% of whom were female. Workforce participation rate was reported at 58.50% (Table 6.5.2-1).

II. Employed population

Employed population refers to the size of workforce having performed paid work (or unpaid work for 15 hours or more) during the week of survey. At the end of 2015, the employed population in Yunlin County was reported at 340,000, representing an employment rate of 96.20% and unemployment rate of 3.80% (Table 6.5.2-1).

6-329 Non binding translation Table 6.5.2-1 Employment status and indicators for the populationFor aged convenience15 and above in the last 10 years only- Yunlin County Unit: thousands Workforce participation Unemployment rate(%) rate(%) Unemployment Population aged 15 andPopulation

Size of workforce Size of non-workforce Employment rate(%)Employment

population Employed Item Total population Unemployed population population rate(%) above above

Total

Year 2006 731 592 323 13 335 256 56.70 96.10 3.90 2007 727 591 335 13 348 243 58.90 96.10 3.90 2008 725 594 333 14 347 247 58.40 96.00 4.00 2009 723 598 330 20 351 247 58.70 94.20 5.80 2010 720 599 327 18 344 255 57.50 94.90 5.10 2011 715 601 334 15 350 251 58.20 95.70 4.30 2012 712 602 333 15 347 255 57.70 95.80 4.20 2013 709 603 333 15 348 255 57.70 95.80 4.20 2014 707 605 339 14 353 252 58.40 96.10 3.90 2015 702 603 340 13 353 250 58.50 96.20 3.80 Note: 1. Source: "2015 Yunlin County Annual Report" by Yunlin County Government.

III. Employment categories

An industry breakdown of employment in Yunlin County (2015) showed that 70,000 people (20.59%) were employed in farming/forestry/fishing/animal husbandry, 119,000 people (35.00%) were employed in the manufacturing sector, and 151,000 people (44.41%) were employed in the service sector. The service sector accounted for the majority of the employed population in the county.

Tertiary industries such as commerce, transportation, finance, insurance and service employed the highest percentage of the population in Yunlin County, totaling 151,000 people or 44.41% at the end of 2015. Secondary industries such as mining, quarrying, manufacturing, electricity/gas/water, and construction employed 119,000 people or 35.00% at the end of 2015, increased from the 104,000 people in 2006. Primary industries such as farming, forestry, fishery, animal husbandry and hunting employed 70,000 people or 20.59% in the last decade (see Table 6.5.2-2 for details).

6-330 Non binding translation Table 6.5.2-2 Employment by industry sector in the last 10 years - For convenienceYunlin County only Unit: thousands Secondary Primary industries Tertiary industries Total industries Percentage(%) Percentage(%) Percentage(%) Percentage(%) Percentage(%) Percentage(%) Item Percentage(%) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) Headcount Headcount Headcount Headcount

Year 2006 70 21.67 104 32.20 149 46.13 323 100 2007 74 22.09 112 33.43 149 44.48 335 100 2008 70 21.02 110 33.03 152 45.65 333 100 2009 68 20.61 108 32.73 154 46.67 330 100 2010 68 20.80 106 32.42 152 46.48 327 100 2011 70 20.96 108 32.34 157 47.01 334 100 2012 71 21.32 107 32.13 155 46.55 333 100 2013 70 21.02 116 34.83 147 44.14 333 100 2014 72 21.24 120 35.40 147 43.36 339 100 2015 70 20.59 119 35.00 151 44.41 340 100 Note:1. Primary industries refer to farming, forestry, fishery, animal husbandry and hunting. 2. Secondary industries refer to mining, quarrying, manufacturing, utility/gas supply, and construction. 3. Tertiary industries refer to commerce, transportation, warehousing, communication, finance, insurance, real estate, industrial/commercial service, social organizations, personal service and others. 4. Source: "2015 Yunlin County Annual Report" by Yunlin County Government.

IV. Current state of industries

According to the 2015 "Yunlin County Annual Report," Yunlin County currently has 21,856 registered businesses, with an increase of 274 from the previous year. Out of all existing registered businesses, general commerce represented the largest group (with 14,571 businesses), and was followed by social/personal service, construction, manufacturing, transportation/warehousing/communication, farming/forestry/fishery/animal husbandry, electricity/gas/water supply, finance/insurance/real estate, and industrial/commercial service. There were only 41 businesses in mining and quarrying (see Table 6.5.2-3).

Factory registrations for each industry were accessed from the Yunlin County Annual Report registered in the 2015 survey data not yet announced by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. This study summarized 2014 data below. Yunlin County had 1,682 registered factories in 2014; food manufacturing represented

6-331 Non binding translation the largest group at 27.05% (270 factories) and was followed by metal manufacturingFor (16.05%)convenience and mechanical equipment manufacturing only (8.62%). Taixi Township had 14 registered factories in 2014; metal manufacturing represented the largest group at 42.86% (6 factories) and was followed by food manufacturing (28.57%) and chemical materials manufacturing/non-metallic mineral products manufacturing/mechanical equipment manufacturing/industrial mechanical equipment repair/installation (7.14% for each).

Sihu Township had 15 registered factories in 2014; food manufacturing represented the largest group at 46.67% (7 factories) and was followed by metal goods manufacturing (13.33%) and pulp, paper, and paper products manufacturing/petroleum and coal products manufacturing/rubber products manufacturing/non-metallic mineral products manufacturing/furniture manufacturing/manufacturing not elsewhere classified (6.67% for each).

Sihu Township had 23 registered factories in 2014; food manufacturing represented the largest group at 56.52% (13 factories) and was followed by furniture manufacturing/manufacturing not elsewhere classified (13.04% for each) and plastic products manufacturing/fabricated metal products manufacturing (6.67% for each). Table 6.5.2-3 Number of registered businesses in Yunlin County in the last 10 years Farming, forestry, fishery and forestry,Farming, fishery Transportation, warehousing Transportation, warehousing Finance, insurance, real estate Industry and Social personal service Electricity, gas and water Electricity, gas and water type industrial/commercialand Mining & quarrying & Mining and communication and communication General commerce General commerce (including others) (including others) animal husbandry animal husbandry

Manufacturing Construction supply supply service Total

Year 2006 159 61 796 12 1,748 14,212 753 361 2,387 20,489 2007 143 60 782 165 1,885 14,371 787 155 2,356 20,704 2008 151 55 718 178 1,921 14,079 743 149 2,293 20,287 2009 164 48 703 187 1,926 14,058 721 149 2,254 20,210 2010 183 46 724 196 1,965 14,038 696 145 2,289 20,282 2011 204 44 754 205 2,080 14,186 676 157 2,340 20,646 2012 247 41 765 203 2,219 14,275 661 155 2,367 20,933

6-332 Non binding translation Farming, forestry, fishery and forestry,Farming, fishery Transportation, warehousing Transportation, warehousing Finance, insurance, real estate Industry and Social personal service Electricity, gas and water Electricity, gas and water type industrial/commercialand Mining & quarrying & Mining and communication and communication General commerce General commerce (including others) (including others) animal husbandry animal husbandry

For convenienceManufacturing only Construction supply supply service Total

Year 2013 304 42 788 208 2,311 14,382 629 164 2,514 21,342 2014 367 42 822 207 2,379 14,478 611 178 2,498 21,582 2015 436 41 846 212 2,439 14,571 590 170 2,551 21,856 Source: "2015 Yunlin County Annual Report" by Yunlin County Government. Note: This table only includes companies with share capital below NT$30 million.

V. Current state of farming, forestry and fishery industries

At the end of 2015, Yunlin County had 80,139.57 hectares of cultivated land that accounted for 60.84% of the county's total land area (131,716.27 hectares), and 10.06% of total cultivated land area in Taiwan (796,618.46 hectares). 78,755.37 hectares or 98.27% was cultivated land, whereas 1,384.20 hectares or 1.73% was long-fallow land.

According to the Yunlin County Annual Report, 2015 data is generated by the Statistics Office, Agriculture and Food Agency, Council of Agriculture, before being compiled. Hence, 2014 data is first compiled for some items.

Yunlin County had 74,546 agricultural households in 2014, accounting for 31.50% of the 236,632 households in the county; 59,642 (80.01%) of which worked on fully owned land, while another 12,235 households (16.41%) worked on partially owned land and 2,210 households (0.62%) were tenant farmers. The agricultural population totaled 25,532, which accounted for 36.10% of the county's total population (707,792) and represented a 0.06% decrease from the 74,594 people reported at the end of 2012. Yunlin County's fishery production amounted to 58,531.8 tons in 2015, a reduction of 8,408.3 tons from the 50,123.5 tons a year ago. Inland aquaculture accounted for 53,027.0 tons or 90.60% of fishery production, offshore fishing accounted for 211.1 tons or 0.36%, coastal fishing accounted for 91.7 tons or 0.16%, and marine aquaculture accounted for 5,202.0 tons or 8.89%.

6-333 Non binding translation 6.5.3 Land use

I. LandFor use convenience only

At the end of 2015, Yunlin County had a registered land area of 131,716.27 hectares. 35,318.54 hectares or 26.81% of which were state-owned, 96,017.76 hectares or 72.90% of which were privately owned, and 379.97 hectares or 0.29% of which were jointly owned (publicly and privately). Out of the total registered land area, non-urban lands totaled 120,987.29 hectares (91.85%) and the remainder were urban lands.

Out of all non-urban lands, farming and animal husbandry occupied the largest area totaling 81,152.95 hectares or 67.08%; water conservancy accounted for 7,696.62 hectares or 6.36%, transportation land occupied another 3,725.02 hectares or 3.08%, and mining land occupied the least area at 10.04 hectares or 0.01%.

Taixi Township had 7,596.33 hectares of registered land area in 2015; 3,483.51 hectares (45.86%) of it was non-urban land used for direct production activities (including farming, animal husbandry, forestry, and aquaculture), and represented the largest use of land. The size of construction land (including categories A, B, C and D) totaled 2,182.90 hectares, representing 28.74%. The size of land reserved for communication and water conservancy totaled 1,544.16 hectares, representing 20.33%. The size of land reserved for recreation totaled 75.54 hectares, representing 0.99%. The size of land reserved for special purposes (including graveyard, special businesses etc.) totaled 52.91 hectares, representing 0.70%. The size of land reserved for national security totaled 18.83 hectares, representing 0.25%. Urban land totaled 238.48 hectares, representing 3.14%.

Sihu Township had 10,834.36 hectares of registered land area in 2015; 8,989.62 hectares (82.97%) of it was non-urban land used for direct production activities (including farming, animal husbandry, forestry, and aquaculture), and represented the largest use of land. The size of land reserved for communication and water conservancy totaled 1,046.62 hectares, representing 9.66%. The size of construction land (including categories A, B, C and D) totaled 243.96 hectares, representing 2.25%. The size of land reserved for special purposes (including graveyard, special businesses etc.) totaled 58.73 hectares, representing 0.54%. The size of land reserved for national security totaled

6-334 Non binding translation 208.43 hectares, representing 1.92%. The size of land reserved for recreation totaledFor 1.34 hectares, convenience representing 0.01%. Urban land totaled only 285.67 hectares, representing 2.64%.

Kouhu Township had 9,151.92 hectares of registered land area in 2015; 7,768.36 hectares (84.88%) of it was non-urban land used for direct production activities (including farming, animal husbandry, forestry, and aquaculture), and represented the largest use of land. The size of land reserved for communication and water conservancy totaled 834.58 hectares, representing 9.12%. The size of construction land (including categories A, B, C and D) totaled 211.19 hectares, representing 2.31%. The size of land reserved for special purposes (including graveyard, special businesses etc.) totaled 181.56 hectares, representing 1.98%. The size of land reserved for recreation totaled 6.22 hectares, representing 0.07%. Urban land totaled 150.01 hectares, representing 1.64%.

II. Division and use of urban area

At the end of 2015, Yunlin County had 97.80 square kilometers of urban area, which accounted for 7.43% of the county's total area. The remaining lands were classified as non-urban area. Current population of the urban area totaled 518,700, which represented 74.14% of the county's total population of 699,633. Population density was calculated at 5,304 people per square kilometer (see Table 6.5.3-1 for details). Table 6.5.3-1 Yunlin County urban area - population and density Population density of urban Population in urban area Land use area category Population Urban area Current density of (square Planned Current population project area kilometers) population population density (persons/ (persons) (persons) (persons/square square kilometers) Year kilometers) 2006 97.69 519,700 277,279 5,320 2,838 2007 97.77 519,700 277,446 5,315 2,838 2008 97.92 519,700 289,844 5,308 2,960 2009 97.83 518,700 289,918 5,302 2,963 2010 97.83 518,700 287,732 5,302 2,941 2011 97.79 518,700 290,717 5,304 2,973 2012 97.80 518,700 288,295 5,304 2,948 2013 97.80 518,700 287,349 5,304 2,938 2014 97.80 518,700 309,669 5,304 3,166 2015 97.80 518,700 300,040 5,304 3,068 Source: "2015 Yunlin County Annual Report" by Yunlin County Government.

6-335 Non binding translation 6.5.4 Public facilities

TheFor state of public convenience facilities is explained from three perspectives: only education, healthcare, and water supply. Explanations are provided separately for existing public facilities.

I. Education facilities

According to the 2015 "Yunlin County Annual Report," Yunlin County currently has 3 colleges/universities, 13 public/private high schools (and vocational high schools), 33 junior high schools, 156 elementary schools, and 129 kindergartens.

II. Healthcare facilities

At the end of 2015, Yunlin County had a total of 504 medical institutions, including 15 hospitals and 489 clinics. The number of medical practitioners totaled 6,263; 2,924 (46.69%) of them were nurses, which represented the largest group; the next largest group was physicians (1,214, 19.38%), the smallest group was medical technologists and dental assistants with 1 each. Public and private medical institutions together provided a total of 4,014 beds; hospitals provided 3,288 beds, 2,247 of which were general purpose beds, and 1,041 of which were special beds; and 726 of which were clinical beds. On average, each medical staff member served 112 citizens, each physician served 576 citizens, and there were 57.37 beds for every 10,000 people.

The project is located in Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township. Taixi Township has 9 medical institutions, 9 active physicians, 39 active medical staff and 9 general-purpose beds. Sihu Township has 12 medical institutions, 14 active physicians, 81 active medical staff and 40 general-purpose beds. Kouhu Township has 8 medical institutions, 11 active physicians, 55 active medical staff and 10 general-purpose beds. On average, each medical staff member served 630 residents and each physician served 2,731 residents in Taixi Township. Each medical staff member served 305 residents and each physician served 1,767 residents in Sihu Township. Each medical staff member served 518 residents and each physician served 2,590 residents in Kouhu Township. The above analysis shows Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township as relatively under-provided townships in Yunlin County, as far as medical resources are concerned.

6-336 Non binding translation III. Fresh water supply TaiwanFor Water Corporationconvenience Branch 5 supplies water to Yunlin only County and Chiayi County. Starting from 1998, population in an "administrative district" is used for calculation of water supply coverage, instead of population in a "supplied area." According to 2015 statistics, Yunlin County had total population of 699,633 across all administrative districts and 658,851 people had access to fresh water, which was equivalent to a water supply coverage of 94.17% (please refer to Table 6.5.4-1). Table 6.5.4-1 Fresh water supply in Yunlin County

Water supply coverage Item (1) Total population (2) Number of water users across all administrative within the supplied area (%) Year districts (persons) (persons) (2)/(1)x100 2006 728,490 681,410 93.54 2007 725,672 677,813 93.40 2008 723,674 677,127 93.57 2009 722,795 676,553 93.60 2010 717,653 672,323 93.68 2011 713,556 668,699 93.71 2012 710,991 667,623 93.90 2013 707,792 665,701 94.05 2014 705,356 663,668 94.09 2015 699,633 658,851 94.17 Source: "2015 Yunlin County Annual Report" by Yunlin County Government.

6-337 Non binding translation 6.5.5 Residents'For convenience concerns only I. Response to public opinions raised through EPA's "Environmental Assessment Development Forum" According to Article 5-1 of "Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines for Development Activities" imposed under Order No. Huan-Shu-Zong-Zi-Di 1040051962E by the EPA on July 3, 2015: When conducting environmental impact assessment during the planning stage of a development project, the applicant is required to publicly disclose the name, nature and location of the development project, the types of survey proposed, and the assessment framework adopted on the designated website. The project has complied with the above rules by publishing the aforementioned information onto the "Environmental Assessment Development Forum" of the Environmental Protection Administration on September 26, 2016 (website: http://atftp.epa.gov.tw/EIAforum). See Figure 6.5.5-1 for reference. No opinion was raised by the public within 20 days after disclosure.

Figure 6.5.5-1 Disclosure made at designated website of the environmental protection authority

6-338 Non binding translation II. Convention of public seminars A For public seminar convenience was convened in accordance withonly Article 10-1 of "Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines for Development Activities" at 10:00 A.M. on October 7, 2016 at the , Lunnan Village Joint Community Center near the project site (address: No. 81, Haiqing Rd., Lunbei Village, Sihu Township, Yunlin County) to hear residents' concerns about the project. Information regarding the seminar was published on EPA's website 10 days before the seminar, as shown in Figure 6.5.5-2. Notices were distributed near the project site, and meeting advices were mailed to relevant government agencies and local residents prior to the session. Details of public opinions and responses during the meeting are presented in Table 6.5.5-1.

6-339 Non binding translation For convenience only

Figure 6.5.5-2 Announcement of meeting advice on EPA's "Environmental Assessment Development Forum"

6-340 Non binding translation Table 6.5.5-1 Responses to opinions of attendees QuestionsFor andconvenience opinions Responses only I. Mr. Wu from Sihu Township 1. There is a wind turbine near my house The wind turbine was installed by Taiwan that is very loud at night. The developer Power Company, and Unitech Engineering promised to install airtight windows in Co., Ltd. will help Mr. Wu file the my home, but two years have passed complaint with . and the developer broke its promise. II. Mr. Wu Chao-Hsueh from Sihu Township 1. Local residents in attendance cannot Currently, all offshore wind power projects represent the thoughts and opinions of in Taiwan, including those developed by fishermen. If there are any public Taiwan Power Company and the 2 wind hearings in the future, fishermen should power pilot zones, are progressing through be notified in advance, including all negotiations with fishermen's associations. fishermen at sea, so that they will have To ensure continuity in the communication the opportunity to take part. Also, process, there is a need to negotiate through information must be transparent. This is a unified organization, and since the better for local residents and fishermen. fishermen's association represents all fishermen, the Company will be holding discussions with the fishermen's association. The Company will be organizing another seminar on compensation for fishermen at later time, and we will request Yunlin Fishermen's Association to forward our invitation to all fishermen, so that they may participate and express opinions in the upcoming seminar. The Company will engage professional institutions to conduct studies on how fishermen should be compensated. 2. The fishermen's association doesn't When coordinating with Yunlin necessarily represent all fishermen, and Fishermen's Association in the future, the Fisheries Section of the Agriculture Fisheries Section of the Agriculture Department of Yunlin County Department of Yunlin County Government Government should be engaged. My will also be notified, and fishermen will be hope is that all coastal organizations invited to attend the meeting. will be notified if there are subsequent hearings.

6-341 Non binding translation III. Opinion survey In Foran attempt toconvenience learn local residents' attitudes and opinions only toward the project, the Company engaged the Poll and Market Research Center, National Chengchi University, to conduct an opinion survey in November 2016. Please refer to Appendix 7 and the following for detailed description of the opinion survey:

(I) Survey and sampling method

The sampled population of this survey are residents aged 20 and above within the area of the "Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project" (including the general public, fishermen and local opinion leaders). The Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project is mainly located off the coast of Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township, Yunlin County. Hence, the 600 local resident samples will be distributed among villages of Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township, Yunlin County (Taixi Township: Wengang Village, Hofeng Village, Yongfeng Village, Wugang Village, Haokou Village, Xiding Village; Sihu Township: Lincuo Village, Lunbei Village, Lunnan Village, Guanggou Village, and Bozi Village; Kouhu Township: Xialun Village, Lunzhong Village, Gangxi Village, and Taizi Village) based on their population. A random sample of local residents and fishermen were chosen for a face-to-face interview or stayed for a questionnaire survey. The survey lasted from November 25 to December 4, 2016, during which a total of 602 valid responses were collected from local residents and 270 valid responses were collected from fishermen. A random sample of local opinion leaders (including legislators, township mayor, councilors, village chiefs, community development association leaders, and fishermen's association leaders) were chosen and interviewed face-to-face or via telephone between November 25 and December 16, 2016, during which a total of 51 valid responses were collected.

(II) Sampling error

For the 872 responses collected from the local residents and fishermen, the sampling error was calculated to be 3.32% at a 95% confidence level.

× = × 0.5 × 0.5 = 1.96 × = 3.32% 872

6-342 Non binding translation

ForD: Error pconvenience×q: Sample maximum standard error Z: only Confidence level n: Sample count

(III) Description of opinion survey results

1. Understanding of Taiwan's power supply

Surveys of local residents in Taixi Township and Kouhu Township showed that most residents felt Taiwan's power supply was "regular" (35.3% and 45.5% respectively), followed by "sufficient" (30.7% and 34.1% respectively) and "insufficient" (19.3% and 15% respectively). Most local residents in Sihu Township felt Taiwan's power supply was "regular" (25.2%), followed by "sufficient" (24.4%) and "abundant" (23.7%). Overall, 42% of local residents felt Taiwan's power supply was "abundant" or "sufficient", but 22% of local residents felt that Taiwan's power supply was "very insufficient" or "insufficient." Most fishermen felt Taiwan's power supply was "regular" (35.2%), followed by "insufficient" (26.7%) and "very insufficient" (20%).

Survey results showed that 42% of local residents felt Taiwan's power supply was "abundant" or "sufficient", but 22% of local residents felt that Taiwan's power supply was "very insufficient" or "insufficient." Survey results showed that 18% of fishermen felt Taiwan's power supply was "abundant" or "sufficient", but 47% of fishermen felt that Taiwan's power supply was "very insufficient" or "insufficient."

2. Awareness and attitude towards the "Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project"

(1) Understanding of the project Surveys of local residents showed that 72.3% of Taixi Township residents were "Unaware" of the Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project; 82.2% of Sihu Township residents were "Unaware" of the Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project; 83.2% of Kouhu Township residents were "Unaware" of the Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project. Overall, 77.6% of local residents were "Unaware" of the Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project. Survey of fishermen showed that 55.2% of subjects were "Unaware" of the Yunlin Offshore Wind Power

6-343 Non binding translation Construction Project. Survey of opinion leaders showed that 70.6% Forof subjectsconvenience were "Aware" of the Yunlin Offshoreonly Wind Power Construction Project (70.6%). The results show that the Company should promote awareness among local residents and fishermen to better execute this project.

(2) Issues of concern and interest to local residents The survey results show that Taixi Township residents were the most concerned about and wanted to understand the benefits of wind power (39%), followed by whether it will damage marine ecology (35.7%) and compensation for fishermen/local residents (32.3%). Sihu Township residents were the most concerned about and wanted to understand if it will damage marine ecology (33.3%), followed by compensation for fishermen/local residents (26.7%) and construction area/period/method (23.7%). Kuohu Township residents were the most concerned about and wanted to understand if it will damage marine ecology (34.1%), followed by if it will affect fishing grounds and benefits of wind power (both 29.9%). Overall, local residents were the most concerned about and wanted to understand if it will damage marine ecology (34.7%), followed by the benefits of wind power (32.9%) and compensation for fishermen/local residents (29.4%). The survey results (see Table 4 for details) show that fishermen are currently most concerned about and want to understand the compensation for local residents/fishermen (56.7%), followed by whether it will damage marine ecology (51.9%) and whether fishing operations/area will be affected (46.7%). The survey results show that issues local residents are most concerned about and want to understand are whether the project will damage marine ecology, the benefits of wind power, and compensation for local residents/fishermen. Fishermen are most concerned about and want to understand the compensation for fishermen, whether it will damage marine ecology and whether fishing operations/area will be affected.

(3) Approval for construction of "Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project"

6-344 Non binding translation Surveys of local residents showed that 42.3% of surveyed subjects in ForTaixi convenience Township "Conditionally support" the project,only while 42% of surveyed subjects "Support" the project and 15.7% of surveyed subject "Do not support" the project. Surveys of local residents in Sihu Township and Kouhu Township showed that 40% and 45.5% of surveyed subjects "Support" the project, respectively; 37% and 37.1% of surveyed subjects "Conditionally support" the project, respectively; and 23% and 17.4% of surveyed subject "Do not support" the project, respectively. Overall, 42.4% of local residents "Support" the project, while 39.7% "Conditionally support" the project and 17.9% "Do not support" the project. Surveys of fishermen showed that 38.9% of surveyed subjects "Do not support" the project, while 32.6% of surveyed subjects "Conditionally support" the project and 26.3% "Support" the project. Fishermen appear to be somewhat concerned about this project. Surveys of opinion leaders showed 56.9% of surveyed subjects "Conditionally support" the project, while 25.4% "Support" the project and 17.6% "Do not support" the project. See Figure 6.5.5-3. In summary, 42% of local residents support the project, 40% conditionally support the project, and 18% do no support the project; 39% of fishermen do not support the project, 33% conditionally support the project, and 26% support the project; 57% of opinion leaders conditionally support the project, 26% support the project, and 18% do not support the project. Based on the opinions gathered, the Company may have to explore deep into fishermen who expressed objections and who conditionally support the project. The Company must explore better solutions to address their concerns in order to gain their support.

(4) Reasons for supporting Surveys of local residents showed that surveyed subjects in Taixi Township support the project mostly for the reason that "Wind power is more environmentally-friendly" (63.5%), followed by "It makes efficient use of wind resource" (53.2%) and "Wind power is a clean

energy that reduces CO2 emission" (46.8%). Surveyed subjects in Sihu Township support the project mostly for the reason that "Wind

power is a clean energy that reduces CO2 emission" (57.4%),

6-345 Non binding translation followed by "It makes efficient use of wind resource" (44.4%) and For"Wind convenience power is more environmentally-friendly" only (29.6%). Surveyed subjects in Kouhu Township support the project mostly for the reason

that "Wind power is a clean energy that reduces CO2 emission" (63.2%), followed by "Wind power is more environmentally- friendly" (61.8%) and "It makes efficient use of wind resource" (56.6%). Overall, local residents support the project mostly for the reason that "Wind power is more environmentally-friendly" (55.9%),

followed by "Wind power is a clean energy that reduces CO2 emission" (53.9%) and "It makes efficient use of wind resource" (52.3%). Surveys of fishermen showed support for the project mostly for the reason that "It makes efficient use of wind resource" (78.9%),

followed by "Wind power is a clean energy that reduces CO2 emission" (67.6%) and "It provides sufficient power" (63.4%). Surveys of opinion leaders showed support for the project mainly for

the reason "Wind power is a clean energy that reduces CO2 emission" (69.2%), followed by "It promotes local industrial development," "It provides sufficient power," and "Wind power is more environmentally-friendly" (23.1% each). See Figure 6.5.5-4 for details. The survey results show that local residents, fishermen and opinion leaders support this project mainly for the reason that wind power is

a clean energy that reduces CO2 emission and is more environmentally-friendly, effectively utilizes local wind resources, provides sufficient energy, and promotes local industrial development.

(5) Reasons for not supporting Surveys of local residents showed that surveyed subjects in Taixi Township do not support the project mainly for the reason that "It is inefficient" (55.3%), followed by "There is already sufficient power" (21.3%) and "There are already too many wind turbines" (19.1%). Surveyed subjects in Sihu Township do not support the project mainly for the reason that "There are already too many wind turbines" (38.7%), followed by "It increases noise and vibration" (32.3%) and "It impacts the fishery industry" and "It is inefficient" (both 25.8%). Surveyed subjects in Kouhu Township do not support the project

6-346 Non binding translation mainly for the reason that "It is inefficient" (51.7%), followed by For"There convenience are already too many wind turbines" only and "It ruins coastal scenery" (both 31%). Overall, local residents do not support the project mainly for the reason that "It is inefficient" (45.8%), followed by "There are already too many wind turbines" (28%) and "It increases noise and vibration" (22.4%). Surveys of fishermen showed that the surveyed subjects do not support the project mainly for the reason that "It affects fishermen's livelihood" (77.1%), followed by "It impacts the ecological environment of fishing grounds" (75.2%) and "It impacts the fishery industry" (68.6%). Surveys of opinion leaders showed that the surveyed subjects do not support the project mainly for the reason that "It impacts the fishery industry", "It affects fishermen's livelihood", and "It increases noise and vibration" (all 33.3%). See Figure 6.5.5-5 for details. According to the survey results, local residents' concerns toward the Projectwere that: "It is inefficient", "There are already too many wind turbines", and "It increases noise and vibration"; whereas fishermen's concerns were that: "It affects fishermen's livelihood," "It impacts the ecological environment of fishing grounds," and "It impacts the fishery industry"; opinion leaders' concerns were that "It impacts the fishery industry," "It affects fishermen's livelihood," and "It increases noise and vibration." To execute the project, the Company must communicate with local residents, fishermen and opinion leaders to address the abovementioned issues, particularly local residents' concerns that "It is inefficient," "There are already too many wind turbines," and "It increases noise and vibration" and fishermen's concerns that "It affects fishermen's livelihood," "It impacts the fishery industry" and "It impacts the ecological environment of fishing grounds." Further elaboration on these topics will definitely gain more support for the project.

(6) Terms for conditional support Surveys of local residents showed that the terms for conditional support from surveyed subjects in Taixi Township were mainly "Economic benefits" (46.5), followed by "Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen" (44.9%), and "Providing compensation measures" (42.5%). Surveyed subjects in Sihu Township support the

6-347 Non binding translation project mainly under the condition of "Fully communicating with Forlocal convenience residents/fishermen" (54%), followed only by "Providing compensation measures" (52%) and "No damage is caused to coastal scenery" (30%). Surveyed subjects in Kouhu Township support the project mainly under the condition of "Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen" (54.8%), followed by "No damage is caused to coastal scenery" (37.1%) and "Providing compensation measures" and "Economic benefits " (both 35.5%). Overall, local residents support the project mainly under the condition of "Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen" (49.4%), followed by "Providing compensation measures" (42.7%) and "Economic benefits" (38.9%). Surveys of fishermen (see Table 8 for details) showed that the main condition for fishermen's support is "Providing compensation measures" (80.7%), followed by "Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen" (70.5%), and "Not affecting fishermen's livelihood" (62.5%). Surveys of opinion leaders showed that the surveyed subjects support the project mainly under the condition of "Providing compensation measures" (48.3%), Followed by "not affecting fishermen's livelihood" (41.4%) and "Do not damage marine ecology" (34.5%). See Figure 6.5.5-6 for details. According to the survey results, support from local residents will depend mainly on whether the project is able to assure "Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen," "Providing compensation measures," and "Economic benefits." Support from fishermen will depend mainly on "Providing compensation measures," "Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen," and "Do not affect fishermen's livelihood". Support from opinion leaders will depend mainly on "Providing compensation measures," "Not affecting fishermen's livelihood," and "Not damaging marine ecology." To execute the project under local residents' concerns of "Economic benefits," local residents, fishermen, and opinion leaders are concerned about "Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen," "Providing compensation measures," "Not affecting fishermen's livelihood," and "Not damaging marine ecology." Further elaboration on these topics will definitely gain

6-348 Non binding translation support from local residents, fishermen, and opinion leaders for the Forproject. convenience only 3. Matters of concern and expectations for the Yunlin Offshore Wind Power Construction Project

(1) Construction period According to surveys of local residents, residents of Taixi Township were most concerned about "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (56.3%), followed by "Safety protection" (40%) and "Impact on fishery industry and fishery yield" (36.3%). Residents of Sihu Township were most concerned about "Noise and vibration" (41.5%), followed by "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (40%) and "Safety protection" (36.3%). Residents of Kouhu Township were most concerned about "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (53.3%), followed by "Noise and vibration" (40.1%) and "Safety protection" (37.1%). Overall, local residents were most concerned about "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (51.8%) followed by "Safety protection" (38.4%) and "Noise and vibration" (37.5%). According to surveys on local fishermen, the fishermen were most concerned about "Impact on fishery industry and fishery yield" (67%), followed by "Impact to fishing boat operations" and "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (both 57%). Opinion leaders were most concerned about "Safety protection" (68.6%), followed by "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (64.7%) and "Noise and vibration" (52.9%). Overall, local residents, fishermen, and opinion leaders were most concerned about "Water quality and life within the maritime space," "Safety protection" and "Noise and vibration" during the construction period of the project. Fishermen also thought it was necessary to pay special attention to the "Impact on fishery industry and fishery yield" and "Impact of fishing boat operations."

(2) Operation Period According to surveys of local residents, residents of Taixi Township were most concerned about "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (46.7%), followed by "Safety protection" (43%) and

6-349 Non binding translation "Impact on fishery industry and fishery yield" (42.3%). Residents of ForSihu convenience Township were most concerned about only "Safety protection" (46.7%), followed by "Impact on fishery industry and fishery yield" (37.8%) and "Noise and vibration" (34.8%). Residents of Kouhu Township were most concerned about "Noise and vibration" (49.7%), followed by "Safety protection" (49.1%) and "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (46.1%). Overall, local residents were most concerned about "Safety protection" (45.5%) followed by "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (43%) and "Impact to fishery industry and fishery yield" (41.2%). According to surveys on local fishermen, the fishermen were most concerned about "Impact to fishery industry and fishery yield" (73.3%), followed by "Impact to fishing boat operations" (56.3%) and "Noise and vibration" (55.2%). Opinion leaders were most concerned about "Water quality and life within the maritime space" (64.7%), followed by "Noise and vibration" (52.9%) and "Safety protection" (49%). Overall, local residents, fishermen, and opinion leaders were most concerned about "Water quality and life within the maritime space," "Safety protection" and "Noise and vibration" during the operation period of the project. Fishermen also thought it was necessary to pay special attention to the "Impact on fishery industry and fishery yield" and "Impact on fishing boat operations."

(3) Communication methods deemed appropriate for the developer According to surveys on local residents, residents of Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township considered "Public hearings/Forums" to be the most appropriate communication method (50.7%, 57%, and 56.9%, respectively), followed by "First notify local elected representatives and have the representatives explain to residents" (43.7%, 43%, and 41.9%) and "Use mass media" (36.3%, 32.6%, and 40.7%). Overall, local residents considered "Public hearings/Forums" to be the most appropriate communication method (53.8%), followed by "First notify local elected representatives and have the representatives explain to residents" (43%) and "Use mass media" (36.7%). Surveys results show that fishermen considered "Public hearings/Forums" to be the most appropriate communication method (62.2%), followed by "Directly hold public hearings for

6-350 Non binding translation fishermen" (58.9%) and "Use mass media" (31.1%). Survey results Forshow convenience that opinion leaders considered "Use massonly media" to be the most appropriate communication method (78.4%), followed by "First notify local elected representatives and have the representatives explain to residents" (15.7%) and "Distribute promotional materials" (3.9%). Overall, local residents, fishermen, and opinion leaders considered "Public hearings/Forums" and "First notify local elected representatives and have the representatives explain to residents" to be the most appropriate communication method, whereas fishermen felt the developer could also "Directly hold public hearings for fishermen."

(4) Scenery perception Surveys of local residents showed that surveyed subjects in Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township mostly felt the impact on scenery was "Nothing special" (53.3%, 57%, and 53.3%), followed by "Like the scenery" (31%, 27.4%, and 28.7%). Overall, when asked about their opinion on numerous wind turbines appearing 6-17 km offshore, residents of Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township felt it was "Nothing special" (55.1%), followed by they "Like the scenery" (29.6%). This shows that wind turbines appearing 6-17 km offshore will not have much effect on local residents in Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township.

(5) Tourists' willingness to visit the area upon completion of wind turbine Surveys of local residents showed that surveyed subjects in Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township mainly consider the project as having "No effect" on tourism benefit (72.3%, 79.3%, and 71.3%, respectively), while a smaller percentage expect an " Increase" in tourism benefit (19.3%, 14.1%, and 18.6%, respectively). Overall, local residents generally expect "No effect" on tourism benefit (73.6%), while a smaller percentage expect an "Increase" (17.9%). This means that most local residents do not think the wind farm will affect tourists' willingness to visit the area, and may even provide slight tourism incentive.

(6) Expectations or hopes for this project are as follows:

6-351 Non binding translation Local residents' main expectations or hopes for this project are as Forfollows: convenience 1. Wind power is a clean energy that canonly achieve sustainable development; 2. There should be comprehensive compensation mechanisms; 3. Do not damage marine ecology; 4. Fully communicate with fishermen and local residents; 5. Wind power is inefficient and needs improvement of efficiency. Fishermen's main expectations or hopes for this project are as follows: 1. Do not affect fishery industry; 2. There should be comprehensive compensation mechanisms; 3. Other green energy should be developed (e.g. solar power); 4. Do not affect the water quality of aquaculture; 5. Compensate fishermen.

4. Overall analysis

Based on the above analyses, we found 82% of local residents, 59% of fishermen and 82% of opinion leaders are willing to support this project with and without conditions. They approve of this project for its effective use of wind resources, which is a clean energy and more environmentally-friendly because it reduces carbon dioxide emission, provides abundant power, and drives local industrial development. As for the 18% of local residents, 39% of fishermen and 18% of opinion leaders who were not supportive of this project, their concerns were mostly about how the project may affect fishermen's livelihood, impact the fishery industry, impact the ecological environment of fishing grounds, inefficient, there are already too many wind turbines, and increase noise and vibration. If the developer is able to properly communicate with local residents/fishermen in these factors while take actions to prevent damaging the ecological environment of fishing grounds, provide compensation measures, and gain economic benefits. It is very likely for the developer to gain their support eventually. During the construction and operation periods of this project, the developer should pay special attention to "Water quality and life within the maritime space," "Noise and vibration prevention," "Impact on fishery industry and fishery yield," "Impact on fishing vessel operations," and "Safety protection." It is imperative for the developer to properly implement environmental protection measures, and "Organize public hearings/forums" or "notify local elected representatives in advance and have the representatives

6-352 Non binding translation explain to residents and "Directly hold public hearings for fishermen", so Forthat the convenience message can be conveyed properly toonly local residents and fishermen. Only through the proposition of mutually acceptable solution may the developer gain unanimous support from local residents, fishermen, and opinion leaders.

Support

Do Not Support

Conditionally Support

Figure 6.5.5-3 Support of local residents, fishermen, and opinion leaders for this project

Figure 6.5.5-4 Local residents', fishermen's and opinion leaders' reasons for supporting the project

6-353 Non binding translation

For convenience only

It impacts the ecological environment of fishing grounds

Insufficient

It ruins coastal scenery

Figure 6.5.5-5 Local residents', fishermen's and opinion leaders' reasons for not supporting the project

Fully communicating with local residents/fishermen

Providing compensation measures

No damage is caused to coastal scenery

Figure 6.5.5-6 Local residents', fishermen's and opinion leaders' terms for conditional support of the project

IV. Online publication of major chapters

This development project has complied with Paragraph 1, Article 10-1 of the "Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines for Development Activities," which says that: "Prior to preparing a full report, the developer shall publish

6-354 Non binding translation contents of main chapters mentioned in Subparagraphs 4 – 8, Paragraph 2, ArticleFor 6 of theconvenience Environmental Impact Assessment only Guidelines onto the designated website where the public, civil organizations and government agencies may express opinions in writing or online within 20 days from the date of publication." Meanwhile, a written notification has been sent to the central competent authority, and the municipal government, the municipal council, the township (city, district) office, the township (city) council, and village chief offices where the project is located. The project has complied with the above rules by publishing the aforementioned information onto the "Environmental Assessment Development Forum" of the Environmental Protection Administration on January 25, 2017 (website: http://atftp.epa.gov.tw/EIAforum), as shown in Figure 6.5.5-7. No opinion was raised by the public within 20 days after disclosure.

6-355 Non binding translation Figure 6.5.5-7 Online availability of major chapters from the For convenienceproject only V. Local communication and visit records

The preparatory office began communicating with the leaders of Fisheries Section of Yunlin County Government and the Promotion Section and leaders of Yunlin Fishermen's Association since March 2016. Table 6.5.5-2 summarizes visits over the past year or so. We already communicated with leaders of the fishermen's association before holding the public hearing on October 7th, 2016, so representatives of the association already explained that they will not speak during the public hearing, but a hearing for fishermen must be held once the compensation measures are decided. After long-term efforts of the preparatory office to maintain smooth channels of communication with the fishermen's association, the preparatory office has gained approval from Yunlin Fishermen's Association in principle in letter Yun-Yu-Tui-Zi-Di 1060000448 on June 6th, 2017 (Figure 6.5.5-8). The preparatory office will comply with the three instructions on the letter. Once the development project gains concession approval, the preparatory office will reach an agreement with Yunlin Fishermen's Association regarding compensation for the fishery industry, fishing rights loses, resource restoration, and compensation mechanisms before beginning construction. The office will maintain close communication with the fishermen's association during this period of time to immediately learn the association's demands. Table 6.5.5-2 Visits to Yunlin Fishermen's Association Item Date Subjects Main contents discussed Chief of the Fisheries Ask the Fisheries Section to help 1 2016.03.29 Section, Yunlin County introduce leaders of the fishermen's Government association. Yunlin Fishermen's After communication, we learned that Association, Chief of the fishermen's association holds the 2 2016.06.01 the Promotion Section opinion that wind turbines can be of Yunlin Fishermen's planned. Association Recommended that the location of wind Yunlin Fishermen's turbines should avoid oyster racks. Association, Chief of Furthermore, when selecting the 3 2016.06.20 the Promotion Section landfalls of sea cables, the route should of Yunlin Fishermen's pass through the least number of fish Association farms. Assistance from the fishermen's association can be requested for

6-356 Non binding translation Item Date Subjects Main contents discussed negotiating compensations for oyster For conveniencefarmers. only Yunlin Fishermen's The fishermen's association suggested Association, Chief of landfalls for sea cables, and can also be 4 2016.09.01 the Promotion Section consulted regarding the location of step- of Yunlin Fishermen's up substations. Association The preparatory office explained to the fishermen's association that the public hearing on October 7th, 2016 will focus Yunlin Fishermen's on the villages that power transmission Association, Chief of facilities will pass through on land. The 5 2016.09.19 the Promotion Section fishermen's association instructed the of Yunlin Fishermen's preparatory office to hold a public Association hearing with fishermen, so it only requires a notice to be issued for the public hearing on October 7th. The preparatory office already issued a notice to the fishermen's association regarding the public hearing on October 7th. The fishermen's association indicated that it will not speak that day. Yunlin Fishermen's 6 2016.09.29 The Fisheries Agency will be Association announcing a new formula for calculating compensations for the fisheries industry, and negotiations with fishermen will be separately arranged once the compensation plan is decided. The Fisheries Section indicated that Yunlin Fishermen's Association has some 1,200 fishing boats with a fishing license, but are divided by far sea Yunlin Fishermen's fishing, offshore fishing, and coastal Association, Chief of fishing. The association can provide data 7 2016.11.08 the Promotion Section to the preparatory office when of Yunlin Fishermen's calculating compensations for the Association fisheries industry, so that fish farms can be avoided as much as possible, and the fishermen's association can provide assistance with negotiations along the route of power transmission facilities. Yunlin Fishermen's Participated in the fishery product Association, Chief of promotion event of Yunlin Fishermen's 8 2016.12.24 the Promotion Section Association in 2016. of Yunlin Fishermen's Association Yunlin Fishermen's The fishermen's association in principle 9 2017.03.24 Association, Chief of agreed to installing an anemoscope the Promotion Section within the area of fishing harbors, but

6-357 Non binding translation Item Date Subjects Main contents discussed of Yunlin Fishermen's approval still must be obtained from the For convenienceAssociation county government only before installation. Yunlin Fishermen's Visited and invited leaders of the Association, Chief of fishermen's association to attend the 10 2017.04.17 the Promotion Section press conference on an MOU signed of Yunlin Fishermen's between WPD Taiwan and Yunlin Association County Government on April 24th.

6-358 Non binding translation Table 6.5.5-2 Visits to Yunlin Fishermen's Association For convenience(continued) only Item Date Subjects Main contents discussed We explained the current progress of the environmental impact assessment to the fishermen's association. The executive Yunlin Fishermen's secretary indicated that the association Association, Chief of supports the government's green energy 11 2017.05.23 the Promotion Section policy, but fishermen's rights and related of Yunlin Fishermen's compensation still requires further Association negotiation. We notified the executive secretary that a meeting with our chairperson will be arranged next week. Wang Yun-I, Chairperson of WPD Taiwan personally explained the progress of the environmental impact assessment to the fishermen's Yunlin Fishermen's association, and asked the fishermen's Association, Chief of association to first agree in principle. 12 2017.05.31 the Promotion Section The fishermen's association agreed and of Yunlin Fishermen's added the condition that negotiations Association with fishermen for fishery compensation must be carried out after the project passes the environmental impact assessment. We received a letter from the fishermen's association on June 6th agreeing in principle to the project. The chief of the Fisheries Section also explained to the Fisheries Agency that the letter was provided for the developer Yunlin Fishermen's to successfully carry out the Association, Chief of environmental impact assessment. 13 2017.06.14 the Promotion Section Discussing fisheries compensation of Yunlin Fishermen's would be meaningless if the project does Association not pass the environmental impact assessment. Hence, we will begin compensation negotiations after passing the environmental impact assessment. Directors and supervisors must approve and reach an agreement before execution.

6-359 Non binding translation Original Mail Letter from Yunlin Fishery Association For convenience only Address: 65445 No. 410, Bo-Tus Village, Sihu Township, Yunlin County Handling personnel: Kuo-Hui Wu Tel: 05-7721511-150 Fax: 05-7720233

Recipient: Yunneng Wind Power Co., Ltd. Preparatory Office

Issue Date: Jun 6, 2017 Issuance No.: Yun-Yu-Tui No. 1060000448 Level of Urgency: Regular Classification and Conditions for Declassification or Confidentiality Period: Regular Attachment:

Subject: Please see the Explanation regarding inquiry about the preparatory office's plan to construct an offshore wind farm off the coast of Taixi, Sihu, and Kouhu Township in Yunlin County. Explanation: 1. In response to the preparatory office's letter Yun No. 106060302 dated June 3, 2017. 2. The Association agrees in principle with the preparatory office to commence construction as planned in wake of the nation's major economic and energy policies. 3. The project wind farm is located in an area where fishermen operate. Fshermen's welfare shall therefore be considered as top priority. If the preparatory office receives approval for the development project, the office must reach an agreement with the Association regarding fishery compensations, loss of fishermen's rights, resource restoration, and compensation mechanism before the office may commence construction.

Original: Yunneng Wind Power Co., Ltd. Preparatory Office Copy: Fisheries Agency, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Yunlin County Government

Chief Director Chuan-Yu Lin

Figure 6.5.5-8 Letter from Yunlin Fishermen's Association agreeing in principle

6-360 Non binding translation 6.5.6 CommunityFor convenience and living environment only The wind power construction project is located in Taixi, Sihu, and Kouhu Townships, which are coastal townships in Yunlin County. The geographic environment is part of the Yunlin-Chiayi-Tainan Plain. The population density is 376.39 people per square km. The land is currently mainly used as farmland and fish farms. Hence, local industries are mainly primary industries, i.e. agriculture, animal husbandry, and fisheries. The community environment is a rural village and the population is mainly concentrated in Hofeng Village of Taixi Township, Huxi Village of Sihu Township, and Xialun Village of Kouhu Township.

6.6 Transportation

I. Road system description

The land cable and step-up substations of this project are located in Taixi Township, Sihu Township, and Kouhu Township, Yunlin County. The dock for land operations is located in Qingshui District, Taichung City. Hence, the main road systems of this project include Provincial Highway 17, County Route 158 (Zhongshan Rd.), County Route 164 (Zhongzheng Rd.), and Yun 131-2 Township Route (Yugang Rd.) in Yunlin County, as well as Beiti Rd. and Yugang Rd. in Taichung City. The geometric characteristics of each route are described below. (I) Provincial Highway 17

Located on the east side of the project area. The road is about 40 m wide within the area of the dock for land operations, and has a raised median. There are two fast lanes and one mixed lane in each directionon the north section of Beiti Rd.; there are three fast lanes and one mixed lane in each direction on the south section of Beiti Rd. There are no sidewalks and no parking control measures on both sides. Roads are about 20 m wide within the area where land cables are buried, and has a raised median. There is one fast lane and one mixed lane in each direction. There are no sidewalks and no parking control measures on both sides. (II) County Route 158 (Zhongshan Rd.)

Located on the east side of the project area. The road is about 17 m wide within the project area, and has a median line. There is one mixed lane in

6-361 Non binding translation each direction. There are no sidewalks and no parking control measures on Forboth sides. convenience only (III) County Route 164 (Zhongzheng Rd.)

Located on the east side of the project area. The road is about 12 m wide within the project area, and has a median line. There is one mixed lane in each direction. There are no sidewalks and no parking control measures on both sides. (IV) Yun 131-2 Township Route (Yugang Rd.)

Located on the east side of the project area. The road is about 18 m wide within the project area, and has a median line. There is one mixed lane in each direction. There are no sidewalks and no parking control measures on both sides. (V) Beiti Road

Located on the east side of the project area. The road is about 25 m wide within the project area, and has a raised median. There is three mixed lanes in each direction. There are no sidewalks and no parking control measures on both sides. (VI) Yugang Road

Located on the east side of the project area. The road is aout 30 m wide within the project area, and has a raised median. There is three mixed lanes in each direction, and there are 3.0-3.5 m wide sidewalks on each side, but there are no parking control measures on both sides.

II. Definition of road type

According to definitions in the 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual issued by the Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, the project area is in the suburbs and road systems can be divided into multiple lane suburban roadway and two lane suburban roadway based on the geometric characteristics of roadways. Provincial Highway 17, Beiti Rd., and Yugang Rd. all have at least two lanes in each direction in the project area, and are therefore categorized as multiple lane suburban roadways. County Route 158, County Route 164, and Yun 131-2 Township Route all have two lanes in both directions, and are therefore categorized as two lane suburban roadways. V/C (volume/capacity) is the standard used to evaluate roadway loading when assessing the service level of roadways. Based on the definition

6-362 Non binding translation above, roadway capacity of multiple lane suburban roads and two lane suburban roadsFor in this project convenience is estimated using the method described only below: (I) Multiple lane suburban roadway 1. The traffic flow rate and vehicle composition on multiple lane suburban roadways can be estimated using the equation below: Single direction traffic flow rate:

Q 60 Q15  PHF Q 15 =single direction rush hour traffic flow per 15 minutes; Q 60 =single direction rush hour traffic flow per 60 minutes;

PHF Rush hour coefficient;  (Q   fPfPfPq ) 151 1 1 mmBBss 1 (equation 1)  Q  qq 1152

q1 =Mixed lane rush hour traffic flow rate per 15 minutes (PCU/hour);

q2 =Fast lane rush hour traffic flow rate per 15 minutes (PCU/hour);

in which equation 1:

Ps, PB, Pm: Ratio of small vehicles, large vehicles, and motorcycles Q P P in overall traffic 15 flow ( s + PB + m =1.0); f f s1 , fB1 , m1 : Ratio of small vehicles, large vehicles, and

motorcycles using mixed lanes.

Vehicle composition of each lane type: fP P  kk 1 k1  fPfPfP 1 1 mmBBSS 1 , k=s,B,m (equation 2)

in which equation 2: P k1 : Ratio of small vehicles (k=s), large vehicles (k=B), and motorcycles (k=m) using mixed lanes.  fP )1( P  kk 1 k 2  fPfPfP )1()1()1( 1 BSS 1 mB m1 , k=s,B,m (equation 3)

6-363 Non binding translation in which equation 3: P Fork 2 :convenience Ratio of small vehicles (k=s), large only vehicles (k=B), and motorcycles (k=m) using fast lanes.

2. The traffic flow rate of small and large vehicles and be estimated using the following equation:  1  EPqq 1 iie   mmi  (equation 4)

in which equation 4: q ie : Traffic flow rate with a mixture of small and large vehicles on different lane types i ( i = mixed lane, i = 2 fast lane) every 15 minutes (PCU/hour) during rush hour; q i : Rush hour traffic flow rate per lane i per 15 minutes (PCU/hour/lane); P mi : Ratio of motorcycles to all vehicles on i lanes; E m : Passenger car equivalent of one motorcycle (recommended value: 0.36).

3. The average free-flow rate uphill on each type of lane can be estimated using the following equation:

Factors for adjusting the capacity of slopes 1 f g  Y 1 e 4998.6 1753.8 0024.15 2259.9 Y  S - S  S  S  7942.10 1 e 1 1 e 2 1 e 3 1 e 4  3  i   jij   AXAS i4  j 1  , i =1,2,3,4 (equation 5)

in which equation 5:

X1 : Slope (% divided by 100);

X 2 : Percentage of large vehicles (% divided by 100); X 3 : Slope (meters divided by 4,000); A ij : As shown in Table 6.6-1;

6-364 Non binding translation Average free-flow speed down slopes:    VPVPVPV For conveniencefmmigBBifssigi (equation 6) only

in which equation 6:

i : 1 (mixed lane) or 2 (fast lane); P si : Ratio of small vehicles on type i lanes; P Bi : Ratio of large vehicles on type i lanes; P mi : Ratio of motorcycles on type i lanes; P mi : Ratio of motorcycles on type i lanes; V fi : Free-flow speed of small vehicles on flat road sections; V gi : Average free-flow speed at critical points of i lanes; V gB : Average free-flow speed of large vehicles at critical points;

4. Capacity can be estimated using the following equation:  ffCC 0 gw (equation 7)

in which equation 7:

C : Lane capacity; C 0 : Lane capacity under basic conditions (PCU/hour/lane); f w : Factors for adjusting lateral clearance, as shown in Table 6.6-2; f g : Grade adjustment factor, i.e. ratio of slope capacity (small and C large vehicles/hour/lane) to capacity 0 of flat roads;

5. The traffic flow rate and capacity can be estimated using the following equation: V q  ie C ffC 0 gw , The service level V/C is shown in Table 6.6-3 (equation 8)

6-365 Non binding translation A Table 6.6-1 Grade adjustment factor ij and values

For conveniencej only i 1 2 3 4 1 -25.4311 1.5927 0.5364 2.0164 2 -28.4141 0.9223 29.0412 3.9001 3 -2.1535 -20.9247 -0.9524 -1.4430 4 -7.7392 2.1329 0.4501 0.7088 Source: The 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 2011.

f Table 6.6-2 Lateral clearance adjustment factor W1 Adjustment factor Lateral Obstacle in one direction Obstacle in both directions clearance (meters) Lane width (meters) 3.75 3.50 3.0 2.75 3.75 3.50 3.0 2.75 Four lane roadway with raised median  2.0 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.81 1.2 0.99 0.98 0.90 0.80 0.98 0.95 0.89 0.79 0.5 0.97 0.94 0.88 0.79 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.76 0 0.90 0.87 0.82 0.73 0.81 0.79 0.74 0.66 Six lane roadway with raised median  2.0 1.00 0.96 0.89 0.78 1.00 0.96 0.89 0.78 1.2 0.99 0.95 0.88 0.77 0.98 0.94 0.87 0.77 0.5 0.97 0.93 0.87 0.76 0.96 0.92 0.85 0.75 0 0.94 0.91 0.85 0.74 0.91 0.87 0.81 0.70 Four lane roadway with median lines  2.0 1.00 0.95 0.89 0.77 1.00 0.95 0.88 0.75 1.2 0.98 0.94 0.88 0.76 0.97 0.93 0.87 0.73 0.5 0.95 0.92 0.86 0.75 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.71 0 0.88 0.85 0.80 0.70 0.81 0.79 0.74 0.66 Six lane roadway with median lines  2.0 1.00 0.95 0.89 0.77 1.00 0.95 0.88 0.77 1.2 0.99 0.94 0.88 0.76 0.97 0.93 0.86 0.75 0.5 0.97 0.93 0.86 0.75 0.96 0.92 0.85 0.73 0 0.94 0.90 0.83 0.72 0.91 0.87 0.81 0.70 Source: The 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 2011.

6-366 Non binding translation Table 6.6-3 Standard for service level of multiple lane suburban For convenienceroads only Service level Volume/Capacity, V/C A 0.00-0.37 B 0.38-0.62 C 0.63-0.79 D 0.80-0.91 E 0.92-1.00 F >1.00 Source: The 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 2011.

(II) Two lane suburban roadway

1. The V/C of fast lanes can be estimated using the following equation: V SF ( )  快 C i fffC 11 HVdW (equation 1) SF 快 =Fast lane rush two way service rate (PCU/hour); V SF快  PHF (equation 2)

C1 Capacity of fast lanes under basic conditions (2,900 small vehicles/hour, total for both directions); f w1 Fast lane width and lateral clearance adjustment factor (m); f HV Vehicle type adjustment factor;

in which equation 2: V i =Total rush hour traffic flow rate in both directions (PCU/hour);

PHF Rush hour coefficient;

2. Vehicle type adjustment factor can be estimated using the following equation: 1 f  HV  EPEPEPEPEP 5544332211 (equation 3)

in which equation 3:

6-367 Non binding translation P P P1 , P2 , 3 , P4 , 5 is the ratio of small vehicles, large passenger Forvehicles, convenience large trucks, semi-trailers, andonly motorcycles (     PPPPP  0.1 E E 54321 ); E1 , E2 , 3 , E4 , 5 is the small passenger vehicle equivalent of small vehicles, large passenger vehicles, large trucks, semi-trailers, and motorcycles. f d Traffic direction distribution adjustment factor. f Table 6.6-4 Lane width and lateral clearance adjustment factor w1 evaluation form

Fast lane width 3.75m 3.50m 3.0m 2.7m Service level A-D E A-D E A-D E A-D E Lateralclearance 2.0m 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.94 0.84 0.87 0.70 0.76 1.2m 0.92 0.97 0.85 0.92 0.77 0.85 0.65 0.74 0.5m 0.81 0.93 0.75 0.88 0.68 0.81 0.57 0.70 0.0m 0.70 0.88 0.65 0.82 0.58 0.75 0.49 0.66

Source: The 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 2011. f Table 6.6-5 Traffic direction distribution adjustment factor d evaluation form Direction 0/100 10/90 20/80 30/70 40/60 50/50 distribution f d 0.71 0.73 0.83 0.89 0.94 1.00 Source: The 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 2011.

6-368 Non binding translation Table 6.6-6 Standard for service level of two lane suburban roads For convenienceUpper limit of V/C only Delay Plain Hills Mountains Service time level Average Prohibited overtaking Average Prohibited overtaking Average Prohibited overtaking percentage driving sections percentage driving sections percentage driving sections percentage speed 0 20 40 60 80 100 speed 0 20 40 60 80 100 speed 0 20 40 60 80 100 A  30  65 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.04  60 0.15 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.03  58 0.14 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.01 B  45  57 0.27 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.16  55 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13  54 0.25 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.10 C  60  48 0.43 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32  46 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.28  45 0.39 0.33 0.28 0.23 0.20 0.16 D  75  40 0.64 0.62 0.60 0.59 0.58 0.27  39 0.62 0.57 0.52 0.48 0.46 0.43  37 0.58 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.37 0.33 E  75  31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00  28 0.97 0.94 0.92 0.91 0.90 0.90  25 0.91 0.87 0.84 0.82 0.80 0.78 F 100  31        28        25       Source: The 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 2011.

III. Traffic volume and service level analysis

We surveyed the traffic characteristics of main roads in surrounding areas to analyze the service level of nearby road sections and intersections. The survey dates were July 29th, 2016 (Friday, sunny), July 30th, 2016 (Saturday, sunny), November 6th, 2016 (Sunday, sunny), and November 7th, 2016 (Monday, sunny). The roads and intersections surveyed include Beiti Rd., Yugang Rd., Provincial Highway 17, County Route 158, County Route 164, Yun 131-2 Township Route, intersection of Provincial Highway 17/County Route 158, and intersection of Provincial Highway 17/Beiti Rd.,/ Yugang Rd., to understand the level of traffic system services at nearby road sections and intersections. (I) Road section service level analysis

According to the definition in the 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual, main roads in the project area are divided into multiple lane suburban roadways and two lane suburban roadways. Hence, V/C (volume/capacity) is the standard used to evaluate roadway loading when assessing the service level of roadways.

Assessment results of this study show that road section service level was B and above during weekday mornings, evening rush hour, and holiday rush hour, indicating good traffic flow at each road section. Service level assessments during weekday and holiday rush hour are shown in Table 6.6- 7 and Table 6.6-8. Current service levels of surrounding roads are shown in Figure 6.6-1 and Figure 6.6-2. Related Notes: 1. Multiple lane suburban roadway

6-369 Non binding translation (1) Provincial Highway 17 ForWeekday convenience morning and evening rush hour V/C isonly in the range between 0.02-0.10, and road section service level is A. Holiday rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.03-0.09, and road section service level is A.

(2) Beiti Road

Weekday morning and evening rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.03-0.06, and road section service level is A. Holiday rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.07-0.09, and road section service level is A.

(3) Yugang Road

Weekday morning and evening rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.01-0.03, and road section service level is A. Holiday rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.01-0.02, and road section service level is A. 2. Two lane suburban roadway

(1) County Route 158

Weekday morning and evening rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.09-0.14, and road section service level is B and above. Furthermore, holiday rush hour V/C is 0.13, and road section service level is B.

(2) County Route 164

Weekday morning and evening rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.17-0.18, and road section service level is B. Furthermore, holiday rush hour V/C is 0.14, and road section service level is B.

(3) Yun 131-2 Township Route

Weekday morning and evening rush hour V/C is in the range between 0.06-0.10, and road section service level is A. Furthermore, holiday rush hour V/C is about 0.10, and road section service level is A.

6-370 Non binding translation Table 6.6-7 Summary of currentFor service convenience level of multiple lane suburban roads only during weekday and holiday rush hour Weekday morning rush hour Weekday evening rush hour Holiday rush hour Roadways Road/section Direction Service Service Service Capacity Flow V/C Capacity Flow V/C Capacity Flow V/C standard standard standard

North of County Southbound 3,603 123 0.03 A 3,607 139 0.04 A 3,608 196 0.05 A Route 158 Northbound 3,606 199 0.06 A 3,605 85 0.02 A 3,605 122 0.03 A

South of County Southbound 3,603 127 0.04 A 3,604 160 0.04 A 3,607 186 0.05 A Provincial Route 158 Northbound 3,604 225 0.06 A 3,604 91 0.03 A 3,605 178 0.05 A Highway 17 Southbound 5,372 536 0.10 A 5,355 248 0.05 A 5,375 262 0.05 A

6 North of Beiti - 371 Road Northbound 5,363 224 0.04 A 5,383 493 0.09 A 5,402 495 0.09 A

South of Beiti Southbound 7,164 514 0.07 A 7,155 313 0.04 A 7,193 241 0.03 A Road Northbound 7,154 301 0.04 A 7,175 490 0.07 A 7,200 424 0.06 A West of Eastbound 5,379 158 0.03 A 5,399 322 0.06 A 5,408 470 0.09 A Beiti Provincial Road Highway 17 Westbound 5,372 319 0.06 A 5,392 197 0.04 A 5,396 369 0.07 A East of Eastbound 5,397 74 0.01 A 5,401 134 0.02 A 5,399 118 0.02 A Yugang Provincial Road Highway 17 Westbound 5,383 136 0.03 A 5,400 77 0.01 A 5,406 68 0.01 A Source: Analyzed and summarized by this project.

Non binding translation Table 6.6-8 Summary of current service level of two lane suburban roads during weekday and holiday rush hour

ForWeekday convenience morning rush hour Weekday evening only rush hour Holiday rush hour Roadways Road/section Direction Service Service Service Capacity Flow V/C standard Capacity Flow V/C standard Capacity Flow V/C standard Eastbound County East of Provincial 2,973 413 0.14 B 2,682 254 0.09 A 2,914 380 0.13 B Route 158 Highway 17 Westbound Eastbound County East of Provincial 3,542 631 0.18 B 3,404 578 0.17 B 3,550 486 0.14 B Route 164 Highway 17 Westbound Yun 131-2 Eastbound

6 Township Yugang-Fuan Rd. 3,309 192 0.06 A 3,126 306 0.10 A 3,079 296 0.10 A -

372 Route Westbound

Source: Analyzed and summarized by this project.

Non binding translation (II) Intersection service level analysis ForMain intersections convenience around the project area include only the intersection of Provincial Highway 17/Beiti Rd./Yugang Rd. and intersection of Provincial Highway 17/County Route 158; both are signalized intersections. To evaluate the service level of signalized intersections around the project site, the turning traffic volume at intersections, geometric design of roads, and intersection timing plan, the traffic software HCS is used to evaluate the service level at intersections during weekday morning and evening rush hour and holiday rush hour. The evaluation is carried out in accordance with the 2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual's service level evaluation standard for signalized intersections, as shown in Table 6.6-9.

Assessment results of this study show that intersection service level was C and above during weekday mornings, evening rush hour and holiday rush hour, indicating good traffic flow at each intersection. Assessment of the service level at signalized intersections is shown in Table 6.6-10. Current service levels of surrounding roads are shown in Figure 6.6-1 and Figure 6.6-2. Related Notes: 1. Provincial Highway 17/Beiti Road/Yugang Road

Average delay per vehicle during weekday morning and evening rush hour is in the range between 31.5-49.4 seconds, and intersection service level is C. Average delay per vehicle during holiday rush hour is about 43.3 seconds, and intersection service level is C. 2. Provincial Highway 17/County Route 158

Average delay per vehicle during weekday morning and evening rush hour is in the range between 8.1-17.9 seconds, and intersection service level is A. Average delay per vehicle during holiday rush hour is about 10.4 seconds, and intersection service level is A.

6-373 Non binding translation Table 6.6-9 Intersection service level assessment standard ServiceFor level convenienceAverage delay from stopping at signalized intersectionsonly (seconds) A D≦15 B 15<D≦30 C 30<D≦45 D 45<D≦60 E 60<D≦80 F D>80 Source: The "2011 Taiwan Roadway Capacity Manual," Institute of Transportation of the Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 2011.

6-374 Non binding translation Table 6.6-10 Assessment of current service level at signalized intersections

For convenienceWeekday morning rush hour Weekday evening only rush hour Holiday rush hour Road name Road symbol Direction Average delay Service Average delay Service Average delay Service (seconds) level (seconds) level (seconds) level Provincial A 48.6 48.2 48.3 Highway 17 B 43.1 38.3 43.5 / 39.4 C 40.2 C 43.3 C Yugang C 48.8 49.4 50.1 Road / D 32.4 31.5 31.1 Beiti Road Provincial A 17.9 17.7 17.7

6 Highway - 17 B 8.3 8.1 8.2 County Route158 11.1 A 11.3 A 10.4 A / C - - - County Route158 D 8.2 8.2 8.2 Source: Investigated, analyzed and summarized by this project.

Non binding translation For convenience only

Figure 6.6-1 Service level of roads in surrounding areas (1)

Figure 6.6-2 Service level of roads in surrounding areas (2)

6-376

Non binding translation 6.7 Cultural heritage I. ScopeFor of survey convenience only The scope of survey includes underwater archaeological data collection and the route of land cables, as well as the area within 500 meters from land cables. Survey items include Paragraph 1 of Article 3 of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act: monuments, historic buildings, commemorative buildings, groups of buildings, archaeological sites, historic sites, cultural landscapes, antiquities, and natural landscapes; and Paragraph 1 of Article 3 of the Underwater Cultural Heritage Preservation Act: (1) Sites, structures, buildings, implements, and human remains, including surrounding archaeological and natural contexts. (2) Vessels, aircrafts, and other vehicles and components or cargo of the vehicles, including surrounding archaeological and natural contexts. (3) Objects with prehistoric meaning.

II. Survey method

The survey work is divided into literature review and field survey. The land survey involves both work items, while the marine survey involves literature review and oceanographic survey data analysis. Finally, a report is prepared based on analysis of survey results. Work contents and procedures of this project are described below:

(I) Literature

Literature is first collected and summarized to gain a preliminary understanding of the history, geography, culture, and cultural heritage within the survey area. Field surveys were planned on the basis of literature, and necessary adjustments were made based on the actual situation for subsequent survey work to be successfully carried out.

(II) Field survey

Once indoor work (organizing and reading literature) is completed, field surveys are carried out based on the predetermined survey method. Since the project area covers both land and sea, the survey on land is carried out on foot, examining the stratigraphic profile and soil for any exposed cultural layers, archaeological relics or phenomena. If there are any findings, the auger method is used based on the actual situation to gain a preliminary understanding of the stratum and possible depth of cultural layers. The survey at sea is mainly carried out using oceanographic survey instruments

6-377

Non binding translation within the survey area and then analysis is carried out based on survey Forresults. convenience only

Figure 6.7-1 Location of the project area

6-378

Non binding translation III. Introduction to the survey area (I) ForNatural environment convenience only The wind farm is located off the west coast of Yunlin County, and areas where land cables pass through (Figure 6.7-1) are part of the Holocene alluvium, which is mainly slate-based alluvial soil from the Central Mountain Range, composed of mud, sand, and silty clay. A vast intertidal zone has formed in the coastal area due to sediments, including large amounts of mud, sand, and argillite, brought by Zhuoshui River, Jiuhuwei River, Beigang River, and other small rivers, as well as the effects of longshore current. During the early Japanese Colonial Period, near coast areas where land cables mainly pass through were the flat intertidal zone or sand banks (Figure 6.7-2). There were significant changes in the size of Zhuoshui River, Xinhuwei River and Jiuuhuwei River estuaries, and sandbars outside of Beigang River estuary have also moved outward between 1920-1955 (Chen, 1993: 842-843). The buried military fort along the coast shows that the natural changes and artificial effects have caused significant changes to the coastal terrain of Yunlin in comparison to early 20th century. Now coastal areas are mostly used for farming clams and oysters, and the checkerboard shaped ponds are a local feature.

6-379

Non binding translation For convenience only

Figure 6.7-2 Project area overlapped with topographic map during the Japanese Colonial Period (1904)

(II) History and culture

1. Pre-historic era Like other townships in Taiwan, archaeological survey of Yunlin also began during the Japanese Colonial Period, but historical relics of the Yunlin and Dounan that were discovered at the time were unclear and still have not been verified (Mori Ushinosuke, 1902; Kano Tadao, 1929). Not many archaeological sites have been found in Yunlin, and there have been relatively few archaeological studies compared with other counties and cities. However, an outline of the prehistoric culture in Yunlin County was still completed through archaeological surveys and excavations that have been carried out since the war (Huang and Liu, 1980; Huang et al., 1997; Tsang et al., 1994; Liu and Lin, 2000; Liu and Yen, 2004). The prehistoric culture of each archaeological site is mainly distributed in Zhuoshui River alluvial plain, hills and shallow mountain area, including red cord-marked pottery culture during the medium term of the Neolothic Period about 4,500-3,500 years from present day, which is represented by the Meilin Site. The Yinpu Culture

6-380

Non binding translation about 3,300-1,800 years from present day is represented by the Pingding ForSite. The convenience red slipped pottery culture about 1,800-350 only years from present day is represented by the Fanzaigou Site, and the Culture about 350 years from present day is represented by the Leicuo and Shicuo Sites.

2. Historic era Taiwan's historic era began in the early 17th century when history was recorded in words for the first time. During the Dutch Colonial Period, there were several indigenous tribes living along the west coast of Taiwan in Changhua and Yunlin. In noordelijk, established by the Dutch (i.e. the third indigenous tribe in Zhuluo County referred to by Huang Shu- Ching), there was the so called Flavorlang and Erlinliang areas. Based on the names of each tribe and current location, Flavorlang is roughly located between Xinhuwei River and Jiuhuwei River around Huwei, Tuku, and Baozhong, close to the area known as "Nanshe" during the Qing Dynasty (Liang and Chung, 2001: 43-49). Zheng Chenggong defeated the Dutch in the 15th year of Yongli during the Ming Dynasty, and called Taiwan Dongdu, establishing one province and two counties, in which Yunlin County belonged to Tianxing County. Zheng Chenggong passed away in the 16th year of Yongli (the first year of Kangxi of the Qing Dynasty) and was succeeded by his son Cheng Ching. Taiwan was renamed Dongning in the 8th month of the 18th year of Emperor Yongli, Tianxing and Wannian counties were restructured into sub-prefectures, in which Tianxing sub-prefecture had 34 villages and Wannian sub-prefecture had 20 villages. Pacification Offices were established in the north, south, and . The distance between north and south offices was calculated from Chikan Tower, in which the south route was 2.520 li to Kunqiao in Fengshan. The north route is 2,315 Li to Zhuluo (Chiayi), Shuishalian (Linyibu), Banxian (Changhua), Zhusu (Hsinchu), Danshui (), and Jilung (Keelung). At the time, this county and township were both under the north pacification office of Tianxian sub-prefecture. Farmland was vastly cultivated under the Tuntian system. Douliu, Dounan, Beigang, and Dongshi were not cultivated by officers, and were cultivated by tenant farmers instead (Ting and Lin, 2001).

6-381

Non binding translation IV. Cultural heritage on land BasedFor on the literatureconvenience review, field survey, and the cultural only heritage report of the " Environmental Impact Assessment for the Wind Power Construction Project in Sihu Township and Kouhu Township, Yunlin County (Revised version)," Taixi Township, Kouhu Township, and Sihu Township, where the project is located, have a total of six registered or designated tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Two are located in Taixi Township and the remaining four are located in Kouhu Township. Sihu Township currently does not have any registered or designated cultural heritage (Table 6.7-1, Figure 6.7- 3). Yunlin County only has two announced archaeological sites: Gukeng Dapingding Site and Gubengang Site, which are located in Gukeng Township and Beigang Township. Neither of the sites are located in the three townships of the project, and are fairly distant. The contents of cultural heritage are as follows.

(I) Historical heritage

Wanshan Tongui Tomb in Kouhu Xialiao is located at the north of Xialiaozai in Xialun Village, Kouhu Township, Yunlin County, and was designated as a county (city) designated historic site on January 24th, 2006.

Legend has it that during the torrential rain at night on the seventh day of the sixth month of the lunar calendar in 1845, strong winds blew from southwest to northeast and caused seawater intrusion. Corpses of drowned villagers from coastal villages floated to Xialiao and Wukuaicuo (under the jurisdiction of Santiaolun). Even though there were some survivors, they could not identify the deceased, and it was common for entire families to be victims. Corpses were everywhere without anyone to collect and bury them. After the government cleaned up the mess, a large hole was dug behind the memorial hall to bury all of the corpses. Any corpses, which were not collected or buried under the mud and sand and found afterwards had turned into bone, were placed in a tank. When the tomb was renovated in August, 1852, bone ash pots and the tank (containing bones) were sealed with lime into small dunes, about 400 in total, and a tombstone with the words "Wanshan Tonggui" was erected. A small shrine was built to offer sacrifices, and the tombstone with the words "Wanshan Tonggui" is in the center. The shrine collapsed after long years of being out of repair. When

6-382

Non binding translation the shrine was repaired, a statue was built and put in the center and the Fororiginal tombstone convenience was placed inside the shrine. only Seawater began to intrude into the tomb in Xianshuijue in the northwest of Xinzhuangzai (now Guanggoucuo) in 1914 (the place is now completely underwater), and the tomb was also relocated here. A new grave was dug next to the north of the original grave using the same burial method, and about one hundred mounds were made. A new tombstone was erected next to the main grave with the words rebuilt in the 2nd year of Xianfeng and 3rd year of Taisho, and a small shrine was built north of the old shrine.

There are over 300 small burial mounds behind Wanshan Temple in Xialiao, Kouhu Township, where the ashes of tsunami victims 161 years ago are buried. Locals call it the "Wanshan Tonggui Grave" and nearby residents said that every time they tried to count the correct number of graves, they failed. It was strange because everyone counted a different number. Wanshan Temple in Jiujinhugang, Hanzailiao, Kouhu Township and Wanshanye Temple in Jinhu hold large ceremonies on the 7th and 8th day of the 6th month of the lunar calendar each year to remember the victims. This even developed into the spirit drawing out of water ritual, which is a rare folk custom for flood victims.

(Information consolidated from the websites of Yunlin County Cultural Affairs Department and the Bureau of Cultural Heritage)

(II) Historical building

1. Kouhu Wensheng Catholic Church Located at No.125-3, Wenming Rd., Hudong Village, Kouhu Township, Yunlin County, and was registered at Yunlin County Government as a historical building on September 6th, 2013. The Catholic church was founded by priest Luo Hsing-Ta in Taiwan after receiving a Ph.D. in philosophy in France in 1957. The Catholic church uses local materials and has the unique layout of Catholicism. It is the only Catholic church in Kouhu Township (Information consolidated from the websites of Yunlin County Cultural Affairs Department and the Bureau of Cultural Heritage).

2. Former Residence of Cheng Feng-Hsi in Kouhu

6-383

Non binding translation Located at No.67, Houcuo Village, Kouhu Township, Yunlin County, it Forwas registered convenience as a historical building on April only 2nd, 2013. Late Mr. Cheng Feng-Hsi was born in 1944. His book "He Never Gives Up" contains stories of how he was disabled but still useful and fought his way through life. His life was made into a movie by a movie company in 1977, and the movie became part of life education classes in elementary school and junior high school. Cheng Feng-Hsi's former residence is a three-section residential compound made of brick and wood built in 1960. It preserves many remains of Mr. Cheng Feng-Hsi's life and the implements, books, and musical instruments he used. The residence was preserved to promote Mr. Cheng Feng-Hsi's spirit of never giving up. Family members of Cheng Feng-Hsi still live in the residence (Information consolidated from the websites of Yunlin County Cultural Affairs Department and the Bureau of Cultural Heritage).

3. Haikouzhuang Police Station Located in front of No.108, Zhongshan Rd., Taixi Village, Taixi Township, Yunlin County, and was registered with Yunlin County Government as a historical building on June 20th, 2006. Haikouzhuang Police Station was built during the Japanese Colonial Period, and is a policy agency subordinate to Huwei District Office. It is currently subordinate to Taixi Precinct and is the first historical building to be seen when entering the downtown area of Taixi Township from County Route 158. The historical building's appearance consists of plain bricks from the Taisho Period and stucco finish from the Showa Period, and it also has a Romanesque style. The building contains an office, inspector's dormitory, deputy inspector's dormitory, and assistant inspector's dormitory. The quantity and spatial layout varies with the level of each police station (Information consolidated from the websites of Yunlin County Cultural Affairs Department and the Bureau of Cultural Heritage).

4. Haikouzhuang Officer's House Located at No.24, Minqian Rd., Taixi Township, Yunlin County, and was registered with Yunlin County Government as a historical building on June 20th, 2006. Completed in 1937, it is a one-story wooden building with tile roofs. The building has the layout of a traditional Japanese

6-384

Non binding translation house, and is the only remaining Japanese dormitory in the coastal area Forof Yunlin convenience County. Haikouzhuang Officer's House onlywas renamed Haikuo Township Magistrate's House in 1945, and was the house of township mayors. The house was left unused later on because township mayors were all locals and lived in their own homes. Due to the community empowerment efforts in Taixi Township in recent years, the building has been adopted and is now used by "Taixi Energetic Coastal Work Team." The building is currently the community empowerment center and also the community health center of Taixi Township, providing community residents with a place for information exchange, cultural activities, and public discussions (Information consolidated from the websites of Yunlin County Cultural Affairs Department and the Bureau of Cultural Heritage).

(III) Intangible cultural heritage - Folk customs

1. Drawing spirits out of the water (Che Cang) in Kouhu Drawing spirits out of the water (Che Cang) is a folk custom held in Kouhu Township, Yunlin County each year, and is a combination of locals remembering their ancestors and religious belief. It was registered with Yunlin County Government as a folk custom and related relic on November 25th, 2008. It was later designated an important folk custom by the Ministry of Culture on June 18th, 2010. After the flood in Kouhu in 1845, descendants would visit the mass graves in each village on the 7th and 8th days of the 6th month of the lunar calendar to worship ancestors. Locals later built the Wanshan Temple and combined the ceremony of drawing spirits out of the water (Che Cang) with local religious belief for promotion. Che Cang originated from books on Taoism ritual and means rotating non-stop. Che Cang is divided into blood and water in Taiwan's folk customs. The former uses red colored paper flowers and is specific for delivering women who passed away during childbirth. Water (Che Cang) uses white or gray colored paper flowers and is mainly for delivering people who drowned. Water (Che Cang) uses bamboo skin to weave two cylinders and pastes light colored paper flowers, 12 monsters and freaks are pasted in the order of water, hell and heaven. There are ghosts of the deceased in the water,

6-385

Non binding translation as well as the water deity representing righteousness and foul deity Forrepresenting convenience evil. There are large and small demons, only the city god for judging good and evil, and Ox Head and Horse Face. Finally, there are Guanyin, Shan Cai and the Dragon Lady. At the four corners on top are small triangle flags for calling back the spirits of the dead. Rotating the water (Che Cang) represents helping the ghosts of the drowned find the way on land. In the past, villagers would write the names of their ancestors on the water (Che Cang). As time passed, people now write their own name and address on the water (Che Cang) to express their gratitude. There was a massive storm during the evening of the 7th day of the 6th month of the lunar calender in 1845. Beigang River and Niutaowan River rose to dangerously high levels and the strong winds caused seawater intrusion in the coastal area of Yunlin County. The area from Huwei River to Beigang River flooded over night, flooding major villages along the coast of Jinhugang, Kouhu Township. Jinhugang was hit the hardest as the flooding took at least 3,000 lives. Local elders pointed out that the flooded area included Jinhu, Taizi, Hanzailiao, Chenglong, Xinggang, and Xiahukou villages. After the flood water subsided, damaged ships and the villages were a mess, and the once prosperous towns were littered with corpses. The family tree of many local families documented this horrifying day in history, and literature also recorded this flood as the most severe flood disaster in Taiwan, resulting in about 3,000 deaths. Four mass graves were dug with government assistance to bury the corpses, and the Qing emperor conferred the title (Wanshan Tonggui). The deceased were the unidentifiable family and friends of survivors, and on the 7th and 8th days of the 6th month of the lunar calendar each year, the descendants of the deceased will hold the ceremony of drawing spirits out of the water (Che Cang) in memory of their ancestors. The drawing spirits out of the water (Che Cang) ceremony on the 7th and 8th days of the 6th month of the lunar calendar each year is a rare folk custom in Taiwan for flood victims. A large religious assembly is held along with the drawing spirits out of the water (Che Cang) ceremony in Jinhu, and burning of the king boat is held along with the drawing spirits

6-386

Non binding translation out of the water (Che Cang) ceremony in Hanliao. In Xialiao Wanshan ForTonggui convenience Tomb, people put a pole with baskets of riceonly on their shoulder and offer it to their ancestors. Over the years, residents of Xialun, Poziliao, Guanggoucuo, and Xialiao participate in the ceremony in the old temple at the south. Residents of Sanxingliao, Lincuoliao, Santiaolun, Feisha, and Xiwei participate in the ceremony in the new temple at the north. This arrangement maintains order for the ceremony. The south temple decides the person in charge by throwing red moon blocks, while village chiefs take turns serving as the person in charge for the north temple. The ceremony was originally always held on the 8th day of the 6th month of the lunar calendar, but the date was changed to the 7th day based on an agreement with residents of Jinhu to prevent it from becoming too crowded. The ceremony continues to be held on the 7th to this day.

6-387

Non binding translation Table 6.7-1 Designated tangible/intangible cultural heritage in the For convenienceproject area only Name of Geographic Category Legend Category Grade Doc. No. heritage region

Wanshan County Yunlin Tonggui (City) Fu-Wen-Zi- Historical County Tomb in Burial designated Zi-Di heritage Kouhu Kouhu historic 0952400025 Township Xialiao site

Kouhu Yunlin Fu-Wen-Zi- Wensheng County Historical Church Zi-Di Catholic Kouhu building 1027408677B Church Township

Former Yunlin Fu-Wen-Zi- Residence of County Residential Historical Zi-Di Cheng Feng- Kouhu house building 1027402830B Hsi in Kouhu Township Historical building

Yunlin Fu-Wen-Zi- Haikouzhuang County Government Historical Zi-Di Police Station Taixi office building 0952400512 Township

Yunlin Haikouzhuang Fu-Wen-Zi- County Historical Officer's Others Zi-Di Taixi building House 0952400513 Township

Drawing Yunlin spirits out of Important Fu-Wen-Zi- Folk County the water Religion folk Zi-Di customs Kouhu (Che Cang) in customs 0972401902 Township Kouhu

6-388

Non binding translation For convenience only

Power transmission line

Figure 6.7-3 Distribution of tangible cultural heritage in the project area

6-389

Non binding translation V. Underwater cultural heritage AccordingFor to theconvenience definition set forth in Article 3 of the onlyUnderwater Cultural Heritage Preservation Act:

"1. Underwater cultural heritage: means all traces of human existence having a historical, cultural, archaeological, artistic or scientific character which have been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously such as:

(I) sites, structures, buildings, artifacts and human remains, together with their archaeological and natural context;

(II) vessels, aircraft, other vehicles or any part thereof, their cargo or other contents, together with their archaeological and natural context; and

(III) objects of prehistoric character."

According to the literature review and "Preliminary Evaluation Report on Underwater Cultural Heritage (Final)" for the project, data on underwater cultural heritage is described below.

Since 2013, four shipwrecks have been listed and tracked as underwater cultural heritage, including the Qing Dynasty wooden ship at Kongke Island, S.S. Bokhara, Kohei, and Santeng Maru. All four shipwrecks are located in the waters of Penghu. See Table 6.7-2 for relevant data (Bureau of Cultural Heritage 2013: 53-55): Table 6.7-2 Underwater cultural heritage (shipwrecks) Serial Name Related position Year the ship sunk No. Qing Dynasty Wooden (Mid and late Qing 1 Northern sea area of Penghu Ship at Kongke Island Dynasty) 2 S.S. Bokhara Southern sea area of Penghu 1892 3 Kohei Northern sea area of Penghu 1895 Sea area southeast of the 4 Santeng Maru 1942 main island of Penghu

(I) Qing Dynasty Wooden Ship at Kongke Island

Southwest sea area of Kongke Island was an extremely dangerous area during ancient times. It is likely the wooden ship struck a reef when sailing between Southern Fujian and Taiwan Penghu and sunk. Large amounts of

6-390

Non binding translation bricks, tiles, painted china, blue-white bowl, cups, blue-white plates, and Forremains of conveniencea wooden ship were discovered in June 2009. only The ship is likely a wooden trading vessel from the mid to late Qing Dynasty based on the patterns, and can be used to validate studies on trade routes during the era.

(II) S.S. Bokhara

Discovered at Gupo Island in November 2009. The S.S. Bokhara commercial ship is a large steamship made by P. and O. Co., and set sail from Shanghai carrying mail in 1892, headed towards Europe through Hong Kong (carried cricket players that entered a tournament in Shanghai). The ship encountered a typhoon on October 11th and sunk after striking a reef. Of the 148 passengers, only 23 survived. The incident was covered extensively by international media, and the U.K. donated money for building a lighthouse and built a monument on Gupo Island. The discovery of the S.S. Bokhara can not only validate the historical incident, but also allow understanding of trade at the time and daily necessities.

(III) Kohei

Discovered at Haopu Shallow Reef at Jiangjun Island in June 2010. The Kohei was built by Fuzhou Mawei Shipyard during Emperor Guangxu of the Qing Dynasty. It is a cruiser of the Guangdong Navy during the Qing Dynasty. After losing Naval Battle of Yalu River during the First Sino- Japanese War in 1894, the ship surrendered at Weihaiwei and became part of the Japanese fleet. It later took part in the mission to take over Taiwan and Penghu. Files of Taiwan Governor-General's Office recorded that the ship struck a reef and sunk when searching for Lin Ting-Cheng, the leader of the defeated troops, in 1895. Of the 160 persons on the ship, 37 were missing while the remaining were all rescued. A monument was erected in Penghu and Hiroshima and provides evidence for research on the late Qing Dynasty and wars.

(IV) Santeng Maru

Discovered at Liuchi Reef in May 2010. The Santeng Maru was a transport ship of Japan during World War II. It was sunk by a torpedo fired by a submarine of the U.S. Army in 1942.

Furthermore, Jiangjun No.1 was investigated and dug up, but was not listed and tracked (Huang, 1996, 1997, 1999). The shipwrecks listed or not yet

6-391

Non binding translation listed are all located in the sea area of Penghu, and are not within the project Forarea. convenience only According to the Records of 18-20 Century Shipwrecks in Sea Areas Near Changhua and Yunlin Counties published by Tang Hsi-Yung in 2016, rivers in Yunlin County often carry sand and stones due to the fast flow. The river bed dries up when there is no rain, which is extremely inconvenient for sea transport. Harbors along the coast of Yunlin include Santiaolun, Taixi, and Poziliao, which are mainly fishing harbors. Even though Ben Harbor provides access, the convenient land transport replaced the role of sea transport. Please refer to Table 6.7-3 to Table 6.7-6 for records of shipwrecks during the Dutch Colonial Period, Qing Dynasty, Japanese Colonial Period, and after the war. Table 6.7-3 Records of shipwrecks during the Dutch Colonial Period (in chronological order) Tonnage Tonnage number Serial Date of Vessel name Model Location shipwreck

21 Jonker 1647-10-21 fluit – Wanckan, Budai, Chiayi 22 Potvis 1650-07-14 fluit 300 Taiwan Strait 23 Duif,Witte 1650-07-14 fluit 380 Taiwan Strait 30 Lam-Witte 1654-10-28 fluit – Caya, near Budai, Chiayi 40 Formosa 1651-08-02 galjoot Stranded at Beixianwei Chinese Between Dayuan and 42 Schevelingh 1650-10-14 sailboat Huweilong 43 Sloutelande 1655-08-09 jacht Taiwan Strait Source: Records of 18-20 Century Shipwrecks in Sea Areas Near Changhua and Yunlin Counties published by Tang Hsi-Yung in 2016

6-392

Non binding translation Table 6.7-4 Records of shipwrecks during the Qing Dynasty (lunar calendar) calendar) (lunar Reason the ship ship the Reason Time ship sank sank ship Time survived/died survived/died salvaged/lost salvaged/lost Nationality Nationality Headcount Headcount Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Serial No. No. Serial Location Location Course Course Nature Nature Vessel Vessel Cargo Cargo Cargo Cargo

Name Name For convenience only Carry Carry Carry Carry Crew Crew ak sank

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing 26th day winds Encountered Taiwan of the 7th Navy month in Xiezhong Navy the 7th 1 soldier 1 Soldiers Ben Harbor Battalion ship year of died Ping-Zi Emperor No.14 Yongzhe ng

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing 23rd day winds Encountered of the leap month 3 crew Civilian Coastal area (7th) in 2 members ship of Zhuluo the 7th died year of Emperor Yongzhe ng

Island─ Island─ Changshua Luozhou winds Encountered All rescued 12th day and of the 9th transported Drifted to

Korea Korea month in to Xiamen Datutou at the 7th on the 15th 3 Horses 30 people Sanlin year of day of the Harbor in Emperor 1st month in Changhua Yongzhe the 8th year ng of Emperor Yongzheng

8th day winds Encountered Taiwan of the 8th Navy Navy month in Xiezuo Surface of Armaments 18 people 4 picket the 15th Battalion Lokiang lost drowned boat year of Ding-Zi Emperor No.17 Qianlong

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Battalion Navy Taiwan ─ Harbor Luzai 16th day navigation Inappropriate Arrows, of the shields, 6 crew 10th knives and Taiwan Shanba members, month in multiple All were 5 Navy Po- ntou 14 sailors, the 32nd bullets rescued Zi No.5 Ship and 1 year of magazine passenger Emperor erupters Qianlong were lost County County Luoyuan Fujian ─ Harbor Luzai Oil and First nine winds Encountered

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing rice, as days of Duyong well as the 6th Government 26 soldiers Off the fu roughly month in grains, ship died; 1 6 27 people coast of civilian 2,790 kg the 51st and cargo person was Beiding ship of grain year of were lost rescued for the Emperor army Qianlong

6-393

Non binding translation (lunar calendar) calendar) (lunar Reason the ship ship the Reason Time ship sank sank ship Time survived/died survived/died salvaged/lost salvaged/lost Nationality Nationality Headcount Headcount Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Serial No. No. Serial Location Location Course Course Nature Nature Vessel Vessel Cargo Cargo Cargo Cargo Name Name Carry Carry Carry Carry Crew Crew For convenience only sank

Luzai Harbor Harbor Luzai ─ Hanjiang 21st day Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing

Encountered Encountered 2 people Roughly of the 9th

Cengch winds were 31,000 kg month in angying rescued, the 7 of grain the 52nd civilian remaining for the year of ship were all army Emperor missing Qianlong Luzai Harbor ─ Harbor Luzai First nine winds Encountered

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing days of the 3rd Picket month in Rescued by 8 29 people Heishuiyang boat the 53rd civilian ship year of Emperor Qianlong

Japan Japan winds Encountered All were rescued, 14 3rd crew 14 crew month of members Tiandewa members Drifted to the 15th 9 were n including Changhua year of transported Sanjiro Emperor back to Jiaqing Japan from Zhapu

Taiwan Beiyang ─ Harbor Luzai 26th day Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Navy Off the of the 6th Encountered

Navy winds Xiebiaozh coast of month in ship/ Armaments 5 people 10 ong 46 sailors Xinda the 20th Picket were lost went missing Battalion Harbor in year of boat Ping-Zi Changhua Emperor No.6 Jiaqing

Taiwan Beiyang ─ Harbor Luzai 26th day Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Navy of the 6th Encountered

Navy winds Xiebiaozh month in ship/ Stranded in All were 11 ong 41 sailors the 20th Picket Daku River rescued Battalion year of boat Ping-Zi Emperor No.11 Jiaqing

Taiwan Beiyang ─ Harbor Luzai 26th day Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Navy Off the of the 6th Encountered

Navy winds Xiebiaozh coast of month in ship/ Salvaged 3 12 ong 34 sailors Xinda the 20th 1 person died Picket cannons Battalion Harbor in year of boat Fang-Zi Changhua Emperor No.2 Jiaqing

Taiwan Beiyang ─ Harbor Luzai 26th day Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Navy Off the of the 6th Encountered

Navy winds Xiebiaozu coast of month in ship/ Armaments 9 people 13 o 39 sailors Xinda the 20th Picket lost went missing Battalion Harbor in year of boat Fang-Zi Changhua Emperor No.5 Jiaqing

6-394

Non binding translation (lunar calendar) calendar) (lunar Reason the ship ship the Reason Time ship sank sank ship Time survived/died survived/died salvaged/lost salvaged/lost Nationality Nationality Headcount Headcount Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Serial No. No. Serial Location Location Course Course Nature Nature Vessel Vessel Cargo Cargo Cargo Cargo Name Name Carry Carry Carry Carry Crew Crew For convenience only sank

Anping ─ Lokiang ─ Anping 23rd day of the winds Encountered Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Xiamen 10th Navy Off the Navy month in ship/ coast of Armaments 1 people 14 Tibiaoyou the 13th Picket Maiziliao in lost went missing Battalion year of boat Changhua Ji-Zi No.7 Emperor Daoguan g Source: Records of 18-20 Century Shipwrecks in Sea Areas Near Changhua and Yunlin Counties published by Tang Hsi-Yung in 2016

6-395

Non binding translation Table 6.7-4 Records of shipwrecks during the Qing Dynasty (continued) Nationality Nationality survived/di sank (lunar (lunar sank Reason the the Reason Headcount Headcount Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck salvaged/l For convenience ship Time only ship sank sank ship calendar) calendar) Location Location Course Course Nature Nature Vessel Vessel Cargo Cargo Cargo Cargo Name Name Carry Carry Carry Carry Crew Crew ost ost Serial ed No.

Lokiang ─ Xiamen Lokiang 16th day winds Encountered

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing of the 6th Navy 172 month in You ship/ soldiers the 14th Armaments 2 people 15 Battalion Offshore Picket and 28 year of lost went missing Tang-Zi boat sailors Emperor No.5 Daoguan g

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing 9th War The border month of of Chiayi the 4th 16 and Yunlin year of at sea Emperor Xianfeng

Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Island Dashan ─ Island Xi 4th day winds Encountered of the 9th Govern Official month in 17 ment document the 13th ship s year of Emperor Tongzhi Nationality Nationality Reason the the Reason ship sank sank ship

Course Course Time Crew Serial Shipwreck Vessel Carry Carry Shipwreck ship sank Cargo survived/ No. Name Nature Cargo Headcount Location (lunar salvaged/lost died calendar)

Great Britain Britain Great First day reef a Struck Crew of the 8th members Three month in were Bata 18 mast Lu-chiang the 10th transported (Beta) sailboat year of by British Emperor gunship Fly Guangxu to Dagou

Germany Germany Between the 7-8th Stranded months in Schoon 19 Nicolino near the 11th er Lokiang year of Emperor Guangxu Anping ─ Anping winds Encountered Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Taiwan Off the Navy coast of Navy 18 Armaments All were 20 Xiebiaozuo Qingkunshe Battalion ship soldiers lost rescued Ding-Zi n near Luzai No.17 Harbor

6-396

Non binding translation Nationality Nationality survived/di sank (lunar (lunar sank Reason the the Reason Headcount Headcount Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck Shipwreck salvaged/l Time ship ship Time ship sank sank ship calendar) calendar) Location Location Course Course Nature Nature Vessel Vessel Cargo Cargo Cargo Cargo Name Name Carry Carry Carry Carry Crew Crew ost ost Serial ed No. For convenience only

Luermen Luermen ─ Xiamen Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Encountered Encountered

Navy Soldiers winds Jin-Zi ship/ pay of Luermen Silver was 21 No.8 Picket silver 47 Entrance lost boat taels Qing Dynasty Dynasty Qing Xiamen ─ Lokiang winds Encountered

Jindesh eng At least 4 22 civilian passengers ship

Source: Records of 18-20 Century Shipwrecks in Sea Areas Near Changhua and Yunlin Counties published by Tang Hsi-Yung in 2016

6-397

Non binding translation Table 6.7-5 Shipwrecks in the sea area of Changhua and Yunlin counties reported by Taiwan Daily News in 1898-1940 For convenienceSunken only Date Title Vessel name Version location Wednesday, November 11, Ship wrecked at Budaizui Chiayi (Ship name unknown) 3 1914 Tuesday, August Several ships were sunk Taichung and Jinhoxing, Jinanshun 7 15, 1916 during a storm at sea. Chiayi Tuesday, August Several ships were sunk Taichung and Jinhoxing, Jinanshun 7 15, 1916 during a storm at sea. Chiayi Wednesday, Sailboat Deli sank Taichung Deli 6 August 16, 1916 Wednesday, Report on shipwrecked Taichung and Jinhoxing, Jinanshun 6 August 16, 1916 sailboat Chiayi Wednesday, Report on shipwrecked Taichung and Jinhoxing, Jinanshun 6 August 16, 1916 sailboat Chiayi Chinese vessel Monday, July 02, shipwrecked and Tainan Jinfufa 5 1917 abandoned Saturday, August Shipwrecked fishing boat Chiayi Deanwan 1 31, 1918 repaired Saturday, September 23, Junk shipwrecked Taichung Jinjinxing 2 1922 Sunday, September 24, Junk shipwrecked Taichung Jinjinxing 6 1922 Saturday, January Fishing boat shipwrecked Taichung (Ship name unknown) 4 09, 1926 Tuesday, Lokiang / Sailboat Taichung and September 17, Jinquanxing 4 shipwrecked Changhua 1935 Source: Taiwan Daily News

6-398

Non binding translation Table 6.7-6 Shipwrecks in the sea area of Changhua and Yunlin counties in 1946-1991 For convenienceName of Sunken only Time Title Publication Version Remarks shipwreck location Mingbaowan Monday, Taiwan repaired, September 16, Mingbaowan People 2 Yenhuwan River 1946 News salvaged Sunday, June Handling Budai People's Shenanwan 4 06, 1954 Shenanwan Harbor Voice Daily Continue to investigate and There is Sunday, salvage Budai Central another October 24, Shenanwan 5 shipwrecks Harbor Daily News unknown 1954 outside of Budai ship Harbor Continue to There is Sunday, salvage Tzu Chiang Budai another October 24, shipwrecks Shenyingwan Evening 4 Harbor unknown 1954 outside of Budai News ship Harbor Salvage two Monday, shipwrecks Budai Commercial October 25, Shenyingwan 2 outside of Budai Harbor Daily News 1954 Harbor The ship Yongan sunk Thursday, near Lokiang Credit March 31, Yongan Lokiang 4 and could not be News 1960 salvaged after three attempts Fishing boat Tuesday, Off the overturned China October 27, Fengrui No.2 coast of 3 6 people went Times 1970 Lokiang missing Source: Newspapers in Taiwan

Based on the data collected by Chen Cheng-Hung in the "Analysis of Records of Shipwrecks in Taiwan's Sea Areas" in 2006, most records of shipwrecks in Taiwan's sea areas are records of shipping and trading companies and government records. Hence, even if there were records of smuggling or fishing boats, the quantity and location may be relatively incomplete. Studies on

6-399

Non binding translation maritime disasters in Taiwan are very rare. According to records of VOC, at leastFor seven VOC convenience ships sank near Taiwan or offshore of Taiwanonly between 1623 and 1672 (VOC Shipwrecks, 2006). The shipwreck records in sea areas near Taiwan in 1500-1700 listed by Wells (1995) are mainly for VOC, but is more than 7 ships. Please see Table 6.7-7 for details. Table 6.7-7 European ships that sunk in Taiwan's sea areas in 1500-1700 that were listed by Wells Time Vessel name Nationality Position Situation Southwest Captain Alfonso Sanchez, carrying Ship name 1583 Spanish coast of spices, gold and silk from Qianzhou unknown Taiwan to the Philippines Between VOC ship on the way from Japan to 1622 Santa Croix Dutch Penghu and Taiwan Japan Coast of 200 ton VOC ship struck a reef and 1633 Browershaven Dutch Taiwan was destroyed by fire Penghu 200 ton VOC ship, Captain Adriaan 1637 Zwaan Dutch (Pescadores Is.) Waaghals Coast of 600 ton VOC ship, Captain Joost 1639 Aemilia Dutch Taiwan Salters Chinese sailboat carrying silver to Santiago Bay's base Puerto de loas Ship name West coast of 1639 Spanish Espanoles in northern Taiwan. The unknown Taiwan waters were too deep and the treasure was not salvaged. 1639 Zon Dutch Penghu 200 ton VOC ship 1643 Hert Dutch Penghu 200 ton VOC ship VOC ship, both passengers and 1644 Zwaan Dutch Penghu cargo were saved. Offshore of 300 ton VOC ship, both passengers 1654 Taiwan Dutch Taiwan and cargo were saved. May be 1660 Harp Dutch offshore of VOC ship Taiwan 600 ton VOC ship, Captain Lukas Tainan 1661 Hector Dutch Brouwersz, sunk by the army of Anping Zheng Chenggong Tainan 216 ton VOC ship, Captain Luit 1661 Kortenhoef Dutch Anping Pieters Source: "Analysis of Records of Shipwrecks in Taiwan's Sea Areas" by Chen Cheng-Hung in 2006

6-400

Non binding translation The study pointed out that if shipwrecks in Taiwan's sea areas during the Qing DynastyFor are analyzed convenience by geographic area, Penghu has the only most shipwrecks. A relatively large number of ships sailed to Tainan, so Tainan had the second most shipwrecks after Penghu. There were 10 shipwrecks in other areas of Taiwan, and 35 shipwrecks are in unknown areas. Please see Table 6.7-8 for details.

Table 6.7-8 Shipwrecks in Taiwan's sea areas during the Qing Dynasty by geographic area Encountered winds Struck a reef Number Death Average Property loss Number of Region of deaths Artillery Official shipwrecks Quantity Percentage Quantity Percentage Quantity Percentage Ordnance Lingji Gunpowder Others victims per ship location documents Fisher Island (Xi 37 37 100% 2 5.4% 280 174 62% 4.7 ˅ ˅ Island) Jibei Island, 7 4 57% 3 43% 378 293 78% 41.86 ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ Gupo Island Pehu Island 6 3 50% 2 33% 328 328 100% 54.67 ˅ area Penghu Island 7 4 57% 4 57% 181 133 73% 19 ˅ area Table Military Island 5 4 80% 2 40% 84 64 76% 12.8 ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ uniform, area silver sheath Wang'an (Pachao 4 2 50% 1 25% 11 4 36% 1 ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ Island) Dongji Island, 9 9 100% 2 22% 221 158 71% 17.56 ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ Rice Xiji Island Penghu 22 14 64% 3 14% 326 326 100% 14.82 ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ sea area Tainan 25 8 32% 2 8% 291 254 87% 10.16 ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ area Other areas in 10 3 30% 1 10% 61 28 46% 2.8 ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ ˅ Taiwan Others 18 7 39% 2 11% 202 202 100% 11.22 ˅ ˅ ˅ Silver, rice Unknown 35 12 34% 305 269 88% 7.69 Silver Total 185 107 58% 24 13% 2268 2233 84% 12.07 Source: "Analysis of Records of Shipwrecks in Taiwan's Sea Areas" by Chen Cheng-Hung in 2006

According to the study "Handling Shipwrecks in Taiwan's Sea Areas" conducted by the Coastal Patrol Directorate General, Coast Guard Administration, Executive Yuan in December 2008, the 122 shipwrecks that occurred in the Taiwan Strait between 2002 and 2007, 9 of them were medium to large commercial vessels, 10 were working ships and tourist yachts, and 103 were fishing boats. Analysis of the Coast Guard Administration's shipwreck data by sea area is as follows:

(I) Analysis of shipwrecks by sea area

Shipwrecks in Taiwan's sea areas are analyzed in Table 6.7-9, in which the highest number and percentage of shipwrecks occurred off the coasts of

6-401

Non binding translation , Pingtung, and Suao. There is frequent vessel activity in these Forsea areas withconvenience the most number of ships, and a higheronly percentage of shipwrecks occurred in these sea areas. The sea area off the coast of Suao is located at Taiwan's Northeast Coast, and is rough during the northeast monsoon during winter with high waves. The shores are rocky with many capes. Shipwrecks can easily occur due to the lack of navigation equipment and technology. Due to frequent fishing activity in the sea areas of Kaohsiung and Pingtung, most shipwrecks are fishing boats that catch fire and sink. Some fishermen neglect maintenance of their old fishing boats and do not carefully inspect ship machinery and valves before setting sail. Hence, accidents often occur and they cannot respond in time, resulting in a fire accident and eventually causing the ship to sink. There is no data on shipwrecks off the coast of Yunlin (the survey area) between 2002 and 2007. (Coastal Patrol Directorate General, Coast Guard Administration, Executive Yuan, 2008)

Table 6.7-9 Shipwrecks in the northwest coast in the history of Taiwan Sea 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total for the year Percentage Off the coast of Su-ao 2 3 3 3 3 14 11.48% Off the coast of Ao-di 3 1 1 1 6 4.92% Off the coast of Keelung 1 1 1 1 5 2 11 9.02% Off the coast of Tamsui 1 1 2 1.64% Off the coast of Hsinchu 1 2 2 5 4.10% Off the coast of Taichung 1 1 1 3 2.46% Off the coast of Chiayi 1 3 4 3.28% Off the coast of Tainan 2 1 1 2 2 8 6.56% Off the coast of Kaohsiung 3 4 4 2 3 2 18 14.75% Off the coast of Pingtung 2 2 3 5 2 1 15 12.30% Off the coast of Taitung 1 2 3 2.46% Off the coast of Hualien 1 1 1 3 2.46% Penghu sea 1 2 2 5 2 12 9.84% Kinmen sea 2 1 2 2 2 9 7.38% Matsu sea 2 2 1 3 1 9 7.38% Total 17 18 23 26 20 18 122 Source: Coastal Patrol Directorate General, Coast Guard Administration, Executive Yuan, 2008 "Handling Shipwrecks in Taiwan's Sea Areas"

(II) Analysis of shipwrecks that were removed

Table 6.7-10 shows statistics of shipwrecks that were removed, in which 35 shipwrecks between 2002 and 2007 were removed, meaning that there are still 87 shipwrecks at sea.

6-402

Non binding translation

For convenience only

6-403

Non binding translation Table 6.7-10 Analysis of shipwrecks that were removed Merchant Clearing Year Rafts Sampan Fishing boat Others Total For conveniencevessel onlypercentage 2002 3 3 17.64% 2003 4 1 5 27.77% 2004 1 4 5 21.73% 2005 1 5 6 23.07% 2006 5 5 25.00% 2007 4 4 2 1 11 61.11% Total 6 25 3 1 Average 35 Percentage 17.14% 71.43% 8.57% 2.86% 28.68% Source: Coastal Patrol Directorate General, Coast Guard Administration, Executive Yuan, 2008 "Handling Shipwrecks in Taiwan's Sea Areas"

VI. Land area survey results

The land area was surveyed on October 9th, 2016. The scope of survey includes the route of land cables and power facilities. See Figure 6.7-4 for photos taken during the survey. There are four landfall points for subsea cables, specifically: Two locations on the southwest side of Taixi Fishing Harbor (northern power transmission lines), on the south side of Santiaolun Fishing Harbor, and on the south side of Boziliao Fishing Harbor (central power transmission lines). The project's survey area includes the route of land cables and the area within 500 meters of the land cables. The survey is carried out on foot, examining the stratigraphic profile and soil for any exposed cultural layers, archaeological relics or phenomena. If there are any findings, the auger method is used based on the actual situation to gain a preliminary understanding of the stratum and possible depth of cultural layers. The land along the route of land cables mainly consists of fish farms and dry farms. The central power transmission lines make landfall on the south side of Boziliao Fishing Harbor and Santiaolun Fishing Harbor. Power transmission lines are installed follow existing roads and connect to Taiwan Power Company's Sihu Substation. The land along the route of these two land cables is mainly fish farms and dry farms. With regard to northern power transmission lines, landfall points for the subsea cables will be on the north and south sides of Taixi Fishing Harbor, and then the land cables will be installed follow the road along the embankment and fish farms, eventually connecting to Taixi Substation. No archaeological relics were discovered during the survey.

6-404

Non binding translation For convenience only

Landform around Sihu Substation Sihu Substation

Landform around Sihu Substation Landform around Sihu Substation Figure 6.7-4 Photos taken during the field survey

6-405

Non binding translation For convenience only

Landform around landfall points for Landform around landfall points for subsea cables at Boziliao Fishing subsea cables at Boziliao Fishing Harbor Harbor

Landform around landfall points for Landform around landfall points for subsea cables at Boziliao Fishing subsea cables at Boziliao Fishing Harbor Harbor

Landform around landfall points for subsea cables at Boziliao Fishing Landform along the route of land cables Harbor Figure 6.7-4 Photos taken during the field survey (continued 1)

6-406

Non binding translation For convenience only

Landform around landfall points for Sihu Substation subsea cables at Santiaolun Fishing Harbor

Landform around landfall points for Landform around landfall points for subsea cables at Santiaolun Fishing subsea cables at Santiaolun Fishing Harbor Harbor

Landform around landfall points for Landform around landfall points for subsea cables at the north side of Taixi subsea cables at the south side of Taixi Fishing Harbor Fishing Harbor Figure 6.7-4 Photos taken during the field survey (continued 2)

6-407

Non binding translation VII. Underwater survey data analysis UnderwaterFor survey convenience results show that the underwater terrain only at the wind farm includes sand bar, sand levee, and sand dune. The seabed surface and beneath mainly consists of mud, silt, and sand. Furthermore, sonar contact shows that there are 41 objects on the seabed or covered in silt and slightly visible (see Figure 6.7-5 for details). Most objects have an irregular shape or are long objects, in which objects #17, #18 and #27 have a relatively clear pattern and are more likely to be shipwrecks. Remaining objects cannot be identified from the image.

Comparison with the Taiwan Map from the early 20th century shows significant changes in the reclaimed land at the estuary of Beigang River and the coastal landform to the north. The offshore sandbanks also show signs of drifting southward.

During early years, fishermen along the coasts of Yunlin, Chiayi and Tainan found ancient pottery during fishing operations at Beigang River, Huwei River, along the coast of Dongshi, and at Waishandingzhou. Based on the fishing methods during early periods and shellfish often attached to the historic relics, it is a reasonable guess that there are shipwrecks in the sea area of the wind farm. Most of the shipwrecks and their relics are already buried underneath the seabed. In other words, the 41 objects mentioned above may be the modern objects, but the possibility of historic relics being exposed on the seabed surface due to disturbance cannot be eliminated.

6-408

Non binding translation For convenience only

Figure 6.7-5 Distribution of target objects

6-409

Non binding translation Appendix 7 Environment quality survey report Reason for absence of survey (state Category Survey item Chapter Page For convenience onlyreasons) R1. Climate of the area 6.2.1 6-18 R2. Ground 6.2.1 6-18 R Air temperature 6.2.1 6-18 R Wind direction 6.2.1 6-18 R Wind speed 6.2.1 6-18 R Relative humidity 6.2.1 6-19 R Rainfall 6.2.1 6-18 Climate R Number of rainfall days 6.2.1 6-18 R Highest rainfall intensity and time 6.2.1 6-18 of occurrence R Evaporating capacity 6.2.1 6-18 R Atmospheric pressure 6.2.1 6-18 R Typhoon 6.2.1 6-19 R Cloud cover 6.2.1 6-19 R Sunshine duration 6.2.1 6-19 R Insolation 6.2.1 6-19 R Global radiation 6.2.1 6-19 R1. Air quality 6.2.3 6-40 Physical Physical chemicaland R Particulate pollutants (TSP, PM , 10 6.2.3 6-40 PM2.5) RNOx(NO, NO2) 6.2.3 6-40 RSO2 6.2.3 6-40 RCO 6.2.3 6-40 RO3 6.2.3 6-40 RPb 6.2.3 6-46 R Fallout level 6.2.3 6-46 Air qualityAir S Hydrocarbons This is a wind power development project; it does not generate S Volatile organic compound hydrocarbons or volatile organic compounds. S Hydrogen chloride This is a wind power development S Hydrogen fluoride project; it does not generate S Asbestos hydrogen chloride, hydrogen S Heavy metal fluoride, asbestos, heavy metal or S Dioxin dioxin. There are no stationary or mobile S2. Existing pollutants (including sources of pollutant near the project stationary and mobile sources) site. R3. Related regulations 6.2.3 6-40

Noise Noise and R1. Type of noise control zone 6.2.4 6-58 vibration R2. Source of noise and vibration 6.2.4 6-58 R3. Sensitive receiver 6.2.4 6-58

R4. Background noise and vibration 6.2.4 6-61 level

6-410

Non binding translation Appendix 7 Environment quality survey report (Continued 1) Reason for absence of survey Category Survey item Chapter Page For convenience only(state reasons) S Odor concentration: Ammonia, This is a wind power development Odor hydrogen sulfide, methyl sulfide, project; it does not generate odor. thiol, amine or others S Residents' response R1. Rivers 6.2.5 6-64 R Water quality 6.2.5 6-66 R Water temperature 6.2.5 6-66 R Hydrogen ion concentration 6.2.5 6-66 R Dissolved oxygen 6.2.5 6-66 R Biochemical oxygen demand 6.2.5 6-66 R Suspended solids 6.2.5 6-66 R Electric conductivity 6.2.5 6-66 R Nitrate nitrogen 6.2.5 6-66 R Ammonia nitrogen 6.2.5 6-66

Physical Physical chemicaland Physical environment R Total phosphorus 6.2.5 6-66 R Escherichia coli group 6.2.5 6-66 R Hydrology R Characteristics of the catchment 6.2.5 6-64

Hydrology and water quality area R Physiography factors 6.2.5 6-64 R Basin runoff volume 6.2.5 6-64 S Flow S Flow speed S Water level This is a wind power development S River sediment discharge project. It does not generate effluent and hence poses no hydrological S Source of sediment impact to Xinhuwei River and S Tidal limit Beigang River. S Tide level S Flood discharge

R Category of surface water 6.2.5 6-64

R Use of water 6.2.5 6-64 S2. Reservoir, lake The project is not located within the S Water quality catchment area of any reservoir or S Hydrography lake. R3. Maritime space 6.2.2 6-26

R Water quality 6.2.2 6-29 R Water temperature 6.2.2 6-29 R Hydrogen ion concentration 6.2.2 6-29 R Dissolved oxygen 6.2.2 6-29 R Biochemical oxygen demand 6.2.2 6-29 R Escherichia coli group 6.2.2 6-29

6-411

Non binding translation Appendix 7 Environment quality survey report (Continued 2) Reason for absence of survey Category Survey item Chapter Page For convenience only (state reasons) R Salinity 6.2.2 6-29 R Transparency 6.2.2 6-29 R Oil/fat 6.2.2 6-29 R Heavy metal 6.2.2 6-28 R Sea condition and hydrology 6.2.2 6-30 R Tide 6.2.2 6-23 R Tide level 6.2.2 6-23 R Tidal current 6.2.2 6-25 R Wave 6.2.2 6-25 R Seabed heavy metal 6.2.2 6-38 R4. Groundwater 6.2.5 6-69 R Water quality 6.2.5 6-70 R Water temperature 6.2.5 6-70 R Hydrogen ion concentration 6.2.5 6-70 R Biochemical oxygen demand (or 6.2.5 6-70

total organic carbon) R Sulfate 6.2.5 6-70 R Nitrate 6.2.5 6-70 R Ammonia nitrogen 6.2.5 6-70 R Electric conductivity 6.2.5 6-70 R Iron 6.2.5 6-70 R Manganese 6.2.5 6-70 R Chloride 6.2.5 6-70 S Suspended solids This is an offshore wind power development project; it has no impact S Density of escherichia coli on groundwater quality. For this reason, no supplementary underground survey was conducted for the project, and references were made to EPA's S Total bacterial count measurements instead (no survey was conducted for suspended solids, density of escherichia coli and total bacterial count). R Hydrology 6.2.5 6-69 R Topsoil, subsoil 6.2.6 6-72 Soil R pH value 6.2.6 6-72 R Copper, mercury, lead, zinc, arsenic, 6.2.6 6-72 cadmium, nickel, and chromium Geology Geology and terrain R1. Terrain category 6.2.7 6-73 There is no special terrain in this S2. Special terrain area. R3. Surface geology and soil 6.2.7 6-73 distribution There are no special geological S4. Special geological features

features in this area.

6-412

Non binding translation Reason for absence of survey Category Survey item Chapter Page (state reasons) R5.For Earthquake andconvenience fault 6.2.7 6-86 only R6. Geographical disasters 6.2.7 6-89 The project is not located on S7. Landslide area at catchment zone landslide area of any catchment and use of land zone.

6-413

Non binding translation Appendix 7 Environment quality survey report (Continued 3) Reason for absence of survey (state Category Survey item Chapter Page For convenience onlyreasons) Physical Physical chemicaland R1. Survey of existing waste 6.2.8 6-92 R Category 6.2.8 6-92 R Nature 6.2.8 6-92 R Source 6.2.8 6-92 R Physical form 6.2.8 6-92

Waste R Quantity 6.2.8 6-92 R Storage, clearance and treatment 6.2.8 6-93 method R2. Survey of existing surplus soil disposal site and waste treatment 6.2.9 6-94 facilities

R Designed capacity 6.2.9 6-94 R Capacity in use 6.2.9 6-94 R Expandable capacity 6.2.9 6-94 Radio Radio interference S1. TV signal reception This is a wind power development S2. Terrain and land elevation project. It does not involve destruction of any building or S3. Survey of building or structure structure, and hence causes no radio materials interference. R4. Monitoring of electromagnetic field 6.2.10 6-95

R1. On-shore ecology 6.3.1 6-100 R Animals 6.3.1 6-120 R Plants 6.3.1 6-102 The project involves installation of

Ecosystem offshore wind turbines, and causes S2. Aquatic ecosystems no impact to aquatic ecosystems on land. R3. Maritime ecology 6.3.2 6-132 R Fishery resource 6.3.3 6-146 R Life at intertidal zone 6.3.2 6-144 R4. Bird ecology 6.3.6 6-209 R5. Special ecosystem (Chinese white 6.3.5 6-202 dolphin) R1. Terrain scenery 6.4.1 6-234 Landscape and leisure R2. Geographical scenery 6.4.1 6-234 R3. Natural scenery 6.4.1 6-234 R4. Ecological scenery 6.4.1 6-237 R5. Cultural scenery 6.4.1 6-238 R6. Visual scenery 6.4.1 6-238 R7. Tourism analysis 6.4.2 6-241 R8. Existing scenic locations 6.4.2 6-241 Social andSocial economic R1. Current industry structure, 6.5.2 6-245 employment, and agriculture/fishery R2. Use of land within the area 6.5.3 6-251 (including basin and water area)

6-414

Non binding translation Reason for absence of survey (state Category Survey item Chapter Page reasons) S3.For Expropriation convenience of land, removal of The project only does not involve any ground structure, and affected land expropriation or removal of population ground structure. S4. Ongoing or upcoming urban

(regional) plans R5. Public facilities 6.5.4 6-252 R6. Residents' concerns 6.5.5 6-254

6-415

Non binding translation Appendix 7 Environment quality survey report (Continued 4) Reason for absence of survey (state Category Survey category Chapter Page For convenience onlyreasons) economic

Social Social S7. Water rights and water facilities The project does not concern water and and rights or water facilities R8. Community and living 6.5.6 6-271

environment

Traffic R Standard of road service. 6.6 6-278 The project does not involve S Parking facilities parking facilities R Current road conditions 6.6 6-266 R Historical heritage, sites, artifacts, folk customs and artifacts, special Culture buildings (of historical or 6.7 6-288 monumental value), monuments, any other buildings of preservation value and nearby scenery R Underwater cultural heritage 6.7 6-305 Environm health ental ental This is a wind power development S Vector, mosquito, fly, cockroach, project and hence has little mouse and other pests. association with vectors and pests.

6-416