Tomco Energy (TOM LN) Shale Oil's New Dawn

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tomco Energy (TOM LN) Shale Oil's New Dawn TomCo Energy (TOM LN) Shale Oil's New Dawn Fox-Davies Capital June 13 TomCo Energy – Shale Oil's New Dawn June 2013 Contents Valuation 4 Summary 4 Discount Rate 5 Sensitivity analysis 6 Fox-Davies Company Scorecard 11 Fox-Davies Snapshot Summary 12 Directors & Officers 13 Sir Nicholas Bonsor Director and Non-Executive Chairman 13 Paul Rankine Director and CEO 13 Miikka Haromo Finance Director 13 Oil Shales 14 Classification & Geology 14 Reserves, Resources and Economics 15 Production from Oil Shales 17 The Holliday Block 20 Location & Access 20 Geology 21 EcoShale Capsule Technology 27 Shale Mining, Capsule Construction & Operation 28 Pilot Test and Simplified Process Description 29 Appendix 34 Basis Conditions for valuation 34 General Approach to Valuation 35 Brent/WTI Price Comparison 36 Oil & Gas in the United States 36 Summary of Alternative Oil Shale Technologies 42 Heritage Foundation’s Measurement of Economic Freedom 47 SPE Petroleum Resources Classification Framework 50 Glossary 53 Index of Figures and Tables 58 Research Disclosures 60 Zac Phillips 60 Investment analyst certification 60 Research Recommendations 60 Research Disclaimers 61 Fox-Davies Capital Coverage 62 Oil & Gas 62 Metals & Mining 63 Notes 64 Disclaimer: Important Information 67 Fox-Davies Contact List 68 Fox-Davies Capital 2 TomCo Energy – Shale Oil's New Dawn June 2013 TomCo Energy Shale Oil's New Dawn The Company is awaiting Red Leaf and Total to complete their EPS trial and commercialisation evaluation before proceeding with heavy expenditures. This places the Company in the most advantageous position, one in which it is best able to NAV: maximise returns. Overall $184mm £118mm Per share 6p EcoShale Technology From The EcoShale process is a hybrid in-situ and ex-situ technology, where the shale is mined and Current Price 456% restored in ground bound capsule, combining the best of both in-situ and ex-situ, resulting in a relatively cheap cost effective solution to accessing the resources. A successful EPS test will de- risk the process and expedite the next stage of TomCo’s development. However, if it is not successful, there are other retorting options available to management. Stock Data Oil Shale Oil shale is not the same as shale or tight oil. Oil Shales require pyrolysis to liberate the oil. Oil Share Price (p): 1.1p Shale is widespread and where accessible, its principal use traditionally was as a solid fuel. The Market Cap (£mm): 20.2 recent high oil price environment has made oil extraction economic and as such has reignited EV (£mm): 20.5 interest in the pyrolysis of the oil shale for use as a feed stock. Oil Shale in Uinta The Mahogany shale contains one of the most significant oil bearing series in the Green River Price Chart formation, due mostly to its high organic content. The Green River Formation is pervasive in the Uinta basin which is where TomCo’s Holliday block is located. While there is 1.3trn bbl of 2.00 reserves in the Uinta basin, substantial work is required before a full assessment of the recoverable reserves; work conducted by TomCo identifies 126mm bbl of 2P reserves. 1.75 Current Valuation The current valuation (1.1p per share, £20.2mm - $31.4mm) is not a fair reflection of the value of 1.50 the underlying assets, or the progress that the Company has made in developing its assets but of the fact that there is a hiatus in activity ahead of the announcement of commercialisation by 1.25 Red Leaf (2014) and the start of the Company’s development programme (2015). 1.00 Valuation $184mm (£118mm – 6p) Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 Mar-13 We have valued TomCo’s assets at $184mm (6p), using risk adjusted EMV analysis to account 52 Week Range for the commercialisation risks associated with the EcoShale process; this is some 456% above TomCo’s current price. Should Red Leaf declare commerciality with respect to the EcoShale 0.9p 1.1p 2.0p technology, the valuation should trade towards its un-risked valuation of $321mm (11p). YE Sep (£mm unless stated) 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E TomCo Energy is an oil shale production company focused Production (m boepd) - - - - on the Holliday block in Utah Revenues 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 (United States), where it is targeting the Green River Operating costs (1.00) (0.45) (0.45) (15.44) Formation in the Unita basin, which has resources of 1.3trn EBITDA (1.00) (0.45) (0.45) (7.94) bbl. The Company was PBT (1.57) (0.42) (0.41) (16.04) founded in 1987 and is headquartered in London. Net Income (1.57) (0.42) (0.41) (16.04) EPS (p) (0.13) (0.03) (0.02) (0.96) CFPS (p) (0.09) (0.04) (0.03) (10.64) Source: Company & Fox-Davies Fox-Davies Capital 3 TomCo Energy – Shale Oil's New Dawn June 2013 Valuation We have valued TomCo’s assets at $184mm (6p) using risk adjusted EMV analysis. The upside potential from Red Leaf’s declaration of commerciality on its EcoShale amounts to $321mm (11p). Summary In valuing TomCo Energy we have used a similar approach to that which we use to value conventional exploration assets, namely the EMV approach; we discuss our valuation methodology in the Appendix (General Approach to Valuation – Page 35). However, unlike the valuation of exploration assets, we consider the key risk to be the ability of Red Leaf to be able to convert the relative success of its EcoShale pilot, we discuss the pilot results in the Pilot Test and Simplified Process Description section (Page 29), into a commercial application; the valuation of the Company’s asset is summarised in Figure 1 and Table 1 is broken down further in Table 2; the basis for our valuation is provided in Table 14. Figure 1 – Breakdown of FDC’s NAV Breakdown Risked NAV (%) Contribution ($mm) -1.9% 200 150 187 100 50 - (4) 98.1% Core Development Exploration (50) & Appraisal Core Development Exploration & Appraisal Source: Company & Fox-Davies Data Table 1 – NAV Valuation Summary Holliday Block Value Un-risked NAV ($mm) 324.4 Risk Capital ($mm) 2.1 Chance of Success (%) 58% Risked NAV ($mm) 187.2 Source: Company & Fox-Davies Data Fox-Davies Capital 4 TomCo Energy – Shale Oil's New Dawn June 2013 Table 2 – NAV(D) Un-risked and/Risked Valuation Summary Net Reserves NAV(D) Block (mm bbl) ($mm) ($/boe) (p/share) Un-risked Risked Un-risked Risked Un-risked Risked Un-risked Risked Core Balance Sheet Items - - (4) (4) - - (0.1) (0.1) Core NAV - - (4) (4) - - (0.1) (0.1) Development & Appraisal Utah Holliday Block 126 73 324 187 2.6 2.6 11.0 6.3 Development & Appraisal NAV 126 73 324 187 2.6 2.6 11.0 6.3 Exploration - - -- - - - -- Exploration NAV - ----- -- Total NAV 126 73 321 184 2.5 2.5 10.9 6.2 Source: Company & Fox-Davies Data Discount Rate In assessing the value of an oil company’s asset we start with a basic discount rate of 10% (“Base Rate”), thereby allowing us to value the oil in the ground, preferring to use sensitivity factors such as production rates, costs and fiscal regimes. In providing our overall Company risk adjusted NAV(D), however, we account for two additional risk premiums by adding to the discount rate; the two additional premiums are: (i) Geopolitical Risk; and (ii) Business Execution Risk. The assessment of Geopolitical and Business Execution Risks are difficult to quantify as it is subjective and varies from person to person and at what point in time you ask. It is a subjective assessment of a management’s ability to execute its business plan effectively and other operational considerations. For example, an experienced management with a solid track record in benign onshore location near infrastructure will have a higher CoS than an identical asset operated by a less experienced management, in a country with a hostile government in an offshore setting where there is no infrastructure. The overall discount rate is a product of the Base Rate, Geopolitical Risk and Business Execution Risk. Consequently, we have provided a ready reckoner (Table 3) which details the impact of the variation in the contribution that Geopolitical Risk and Business Execution Risk premiums has on the overall discount rate; to the numbers below the Base Rate must be added to arrive at the overall Discount Rate. This summarises the impact that assigning various levels of geopolitical risk has on TomCo’s valuation; we are currently carrying no geopolitical risk for the United States. Table 3 – Impact of Variation in Geopolitical Risk and Business Execution Risk Premium on NAV(D) Business Risk Premium NAV(D) ($mm) (3.0%) (2.0%) (1.0%) - 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% (3.0%) 488 413 351 298 254 216 184 (2.0%) 413 351 298 254 216 184 156 (1.0%) 351 298 254 216 184 156 132 - 298 254 216 184 156 132 112 1.0% 254 216 184 156 132 112 94 2.0% 216 184 156 132 112 94 79 Geopolitical Risk Premium 3.0% 184 156 132 112 94 79 66 Source: Fox-Davies estimates Fox-Davies Capital 5 TomCo Energy – Shale Oil's New Dawn June 2013 Sensitivity analysis In assessing the value of the Company, we have recognised all of the key parameters that we believe impact the valuation, not only the oil price and capital costs but others such as: (i) timing of development; (ii) Fischer Assay Yield; and (iii) technology risks. Oil Price We base our oil price deck on Brent, and apply a discount or premium to it, to arrive at a local price; for WTI prices, we have assumed that ~$10/bbl is appropriate, and in line with the recent average discount.
Recommended publications
  • R&D Data Gaps Identified for Model Development of Oil
    OIL SHALE DEVELOPMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NETL’S UNCONVENTIONAL OIL RESOURCE REPOSITORY Mark W. Smith+, Lawrence J. Shadle∗, and Daniel L. Hill+ National Energy Technology Laboratory U. S. Department of Energy 3610 Collins Ferry Rd. Morgantown, West Virginia 26507-0880 +REM Engineering Services, PLLC 3537 Collins Ferry Rd. Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 ABSTRACT- The history of oil shale development was examined by gathering relevant research literature for an Unconventional Oil Resource Repository. This repository contains over 17,000 entries from over 1,000 different sources. The development of oil shale has been hindered by a number of factors. These technical, political, and economic factors have brought about R&D boom-bust cycles. It is not surprising that these cycles are strongly correlated to market crude oil prices. However, it may be possible to influence some of the other factors through a sustained, yet measured, approach to R&D in both the public and private sectors. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Shale development in the United States began in the late 1800’s. The technology commonly applied was called retorting and the application was generally for domestic uses. However, as industrialization proceeded there have been economic cycles in which the required liquid fuels have been in short supply and entrepreneurs have turned to the vast proven oil shale reserves of the Green River Formation. The USGS estimates greater than 2 Trillion barrels of oil are available in the US in the form of oil shale with nearly 1.4 Trillion barrels being concentrated in the rich deposits of the Green River Basin (Dyni, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • P Ace P Nt Flet Ic =Lr
    p ace p nt flet Ic =lr OIL SHALE 0 COAL 0 OIL SANDS 0 NATURAL GAS VOLUME 30- NUMBER 4- DECEMBER 1993 QUARTERLY Tell Ertl Repository r Lakes Library :::o:'zco School of M.Es ®THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. Reg. U.S. Pot, OFF. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report is published by The Pace Consultants Inc., as a multi-client service and Is intended for the sole use of the clients or organizations affiliated with clients by virtue of a relationship equivalent to 51 percent or gieater ownership. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report Is protected by the copyright laws of the United States; reproduction of any part of the publication requires the express permission of The Pace Con- sultants Inc. The Pace Consultants Inc., has provided energy consulting and engineering services since 1955. The company's experience includes resource evalua- tion, process development and design, systems planning, marketing studies, licensor comparisons, environmental planning, and economic analysis. The Synthetic Fuels Analysis group prepares a variety of periodic and other reports analyzing developments in the energy field. THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. SYNTHETIC FUELS ANALYSIS MANAGING EDITOR Jerry E. Sinor Pt Office Box 649 Niwot, Colorado 80544 (303) 652-2632 BUSINESS MANAGER Ronald I. Gist Post Office Box 53473 Houston, Texas 77052 (713) 669-8800 Telex: 77-4350 CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS A-i I. GENERAL GOVERNMENT DOE Fossil Energy Budget Realigned for 1994 1-1 U.S. DOE and Russian Federation to Cooperate in Fossil Energy 1-2 ECONOMICS MITRE Estimates Synthetic Transport Fuels to Cost $36 Per Barrel 1-3 TECHNOLOGY Hot Gas Cleanup Studied for Biomass Gasificatiop 1-6 INTERNAI1ONAL Methanol Tested as Turbine Fuel in Japan 1-9 1(3CC Project in the United Kingdom Could Use Both Orimulsion and Coal 1-9 RESOURCE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinctive Oil Shale Pyrolysis Behavior in Indirectly Heated Fixed Bed With
    RSC Advances PAPER View Article Online View Journal | View Issue Distinctive oil shale pyrolysis behavior in indirectly heated fixed bed with internals Cite this: RSC Adv.,2017,7, 21467 Lanxin Lin,ab Dengguo Lai,ab Zhen Shi,ab Zhennan Hanab and Guangwen Xu *ac Intrinsic characteristics of oil shale pyrolysis in a fixed bed reactor with internals have been investigated in this study. Mounting particularly designed internals in fixed bed reactor improved shale oil production to up to 90% yield by Fischer assay. Comparing particle characteristics at different radial positions of the reactors with and without internals demonstrated that, inside the particle bed with internals, the product flow was regulated to move from the high-temperature zone (outer) to low-temperature zone (center), which reduced the secondary reactions of released volatiles. Terminating oil shale pyrolysis at central particle bed temperatures of 150, 300, 450, and 550 C showed that the contents of vacuum gas oil and heavy oil in the shale oil produced had increased from 9.63 wt% to 53.29 wt%. The volatile contents of particles in the inner layer of the reactor slightly increased in the early stage of pyrolysis and, in turn, decomposed to form pyrolysis products as the temperature was raised. The adsorption or condensation of liquids on Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. the surface of particles gradually increased from the outer region to the central region of the reactor due to the regulated product flow direction and low temperatures in the central zone of the reactor causing heavy components to condense. Increasing the degree of pyrolysis was also found to decrease Received 25th February 2017 the alkene, aromatic, and cycloalkane contents in shale oil, but increased those of alkane and Accepted 3rd April 2017 heteroatomic compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources and Potential Hydrologic Effects of Oil-Shale Development in the Southeastern Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado
    f*** k JL-i*-< ;^~<r» \ PUB JU9LUdO|9A9Q pue S90jnos0y Water Resources and Potential Hydrologic Effects of Oil-Shale Development in the Southeastern Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado By K. L. LINDSKOV and B. A. KIMBALL U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1307 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Lindskov, K. L. Water resources and potential hydrologic effects of oil-shale development in the southeastern Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado. (Geological Survey professional paper; 1307) Bibliography: 32 p. 1. Oil-shale industry Environmental aspects Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.) 2. Water- supply Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.) 3. Hydrology Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.) I. Kimball, Briant A. II. Title. III. Series. TD195.04L56 1984 338.4*76654 83-600313 For sale by the Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Picket! Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract 1 Selected sources of water supply for an oil-shale industry Continued Introduction - 1 White River Continued Purpose and scope ------------------------------ 1 Regulated flow - 22 Geographic, geologic, and hydrologic setting- 4 White River Dam - Previous investigations - 22 Off-stream storage in Hells Hole Canyon---------- 23 The hydrologic system 9 Green River---------------------------- --------------------- 23 Major rivers --- 9 Ground water - 23 Intra area 9 Potential impacts
    [Show full text]
  • Eesti Põlevkiviõli Tootmise Parim Võimalik Tehnika
    Töö nr ENE1204 Eesti Põlevkiviõli tootmise parim võimalik tehnika Projekti rahastas SA Keskkonnainvesteeringute Keskus 05.07.2013 Tallinn Meie oskused on Teie edu !™ Eesti Keemiatööstuse Liit ÅF-Consulting AS Peterburi tee 46 Väike-Paala 1 11415 Tallinn, Eesti 11415 Tallinn, Eesti Tel. 613 9775 Tel. 605 3150 www.keemia.ee www.estivo.ee Sisukord Eessõna .............................................................................................................................. 4 Kasutatud lühendid ................................................................................................................. 7 Kasutatud mõisted ................................................................................................................... 9 Kokkuvõte ............................................................................................................................ 12 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 13 Reguleerimisala ...................................................................................................................... 31 Põlevkiviõli tööstuse toormaterjal – põlevkivi .................................................................... 33 Põlevkiviõli ............................................................................................................................ 34 1. Üldteave põlevkiviõli tootmisest maailmas ja Eestis ....................................................... 35 1.1. Eesti põlevkivi
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Shale Oil Production Si So Li Chian A
    CASE STUDY OF SHALE OIL PRODUCTION SI SO LI CHIAN A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Petrochemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Green technology Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman April 2016 ii DECLARATION I hereby declare that this project report is based on my original work except for citations and quotations which have been duly acknowledged. I also declare that it has not been previously and concurrently submitted for any other degree or award at UTAR or other institutions. Signature : Name : Si So Li Chian ID No. : 11AGB04580 Date : iii APPROVAL FOR SUBMISSION I certify that this project report entitled “CASE STUDY OF SHALE OIL PRODUCTION” was prepared by SI SO LI CHIAN has met the required standard for submission in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Petrochemical at Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman. Approved by, Signature : Supervisor : Ir. Dr. Low Chong Yu Date : iv The copyright of this report belongs to the author under the terms of the copyright Act 1987 as qualified by Intellectual Property Policy of Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman. Due acknowledgement shall always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this report. © 2016, Si So Li Chian. All right reserved. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank everyone who had contributed to the successful completion of this project. I would like to express my gratitude to my research supervisor, Ir. Dr. Low Chong Yu for his invaluable advice, guidance, his enormous patience and time for leading me throughout the development of the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Wastewater Treatment in Oil Shale Chemical Industry*
    Oil Shale, 2003, Vol. 20, No. 4 ISSN 0208-189X pp. 443-457 © 2003 Estonian Academy Publishers WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN OIL SHALE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY* I. KAMENEV**, R. MUNTER, L. PIKKOV Department of Chemical Engineering, Tallinn Technical University 5 Ehitajate Rd., 19086 Tallinn, Estonia L. KEKISHEVA Oil Shale Research Institute 35 Järveküla Rd., 30328 Kohtla-Järve, Estonia Process water and phenols’ balances for the two processes of oil shale ther- mal treatment, Kiviter (in vertical retort) and Galoter (with solid heat car- rier) were compiled. Options of wastewater treatment in the Kiviter process were analyzed in more detail. Laboratory experiments of biological oxidation of the process water after the dephenolation stage without other effluents and municipal wastewater were carried out. Experiments indicated that the oil shale phenols are generally quite easily degradable when the need for phos- phorus is covered by added reagents. The experiments indicated that, com- pared to conventional aerobic bio-oxidation, the combined process, namely aerobic bio-oxidation with ozonation in re-circulation system, enabled to in- crease the efficiency of purification at relatively low ozone dosages. Applica- tion of ozone at moderate doses (up to 30 mg/L) improved the rate of pollut- ant removal. Injection of ozone at small dose – 2 mg/L – into the activated sludge in the bioreactor increased the sludge activity: the specific oxygen up- take increased about 15–20%. The biologically treated wastewater can be used as some kind of technological water (cooling water) after chemical pre- cipitation and reduction of sulphate content. It can also been discharged to nature, but only after additional treatment to reduce nitrogen content and af- ter filtration to remove the residual suspended solids.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Fuel Properties from Infrared Spectra
    THESIS ON CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING G49 Predicting Fuel Properties from Infrared Spectra ZACHARIAH STEVEN BAIRD TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY School of Engineering Department of Energy Technology This dissertation was accepted for the defense of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical and Materials Technology on July 31th, 2017. Supervisor: Prof. Vahur Oja Department of Energy Technology, TTÜ Opponents: Prof. Dr. Selhan Karagoz Karabuk University, Turkey Dr. Mati Karelson Tartu University, Estonia Defense of the thesis: September 15, 2017 Declaration: Hereby I declare that this doctoral thesis, my original investigation and achievement, submitted for a doctoral degree at Tallinn University of Technology, has not been submitted for any other academic degree. ISSN 1406-4774 ISBN 978-9949-83-145-6 (publication) ISBN 978-9949-83-146-3 (PDF) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/. © Copyright: Zachariah Baird, 2017 KEEMIA JA KEEMIATEHNIKA G49 Kütuse omaduste hindamine infrapunaspektrilt ZACHARIAH STEVEN BAIRD TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Inseneriteaduskond Energiatehnoloogia instituut Doktoritöö on lubatud kaitsmisele filosoofiadoktori kraadi taotlemiseks keemia- ja materjalitehnoloogia erialal 31. juulil 2017. Juhendaja: prof Vahur Oja Energiatehnoloogia instituut, TTÜ Oponendid: prof Selhan Karagoz Karabuk University, Türki Dr. Mati Karelson Tartu Ülikool, Eesti Doktortöö kaitsmise aeg: 15. september, 2017 Deklaratsioon: Deklareerin, et see doktoritöö, mis on minu iseseisva töö tulemus, on esitatud Tallinna Tehnikaülikooli doktorikraadi taotlemiseks ja selle alusel ei ole varem taotletud doktori- või sellega võrdsustatud teaduskraadi. ISSN 1406-4774 ISBN 978-9949-83-145-6 (publication) ISBN 978-9949-83-146-3 (PDF) © Autoriõigus: Zachariah Baird, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 590.04 K
    Journal of International Society for Science and Engineering JISSE JISSE Vol. 1, No. 2, 25-40 (2019) ISSN: 2636-4425 E-ISSN:2682-3438 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maximum Utilization of Energy Source Minerals Using Mineral Processing Techniques: A Review M.A. AbdelKhalek Mineral Processing Dept., Central Metallurgical Research & Development Institute (CMRDI), Egypt A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Received: 02-10-2019 The mineral is one of the most important energy resources. Indirect energy derived from Sun as Accepted: 29-11-2019 Biomass. Organic byproducts were converted to fossil fuels through photosynthesis on Earth. Coal is Online:16-12-2019 a sedimentary rock that contains the accumulation of organic matter from plants. Coal is upgraded using gravity and flotation techniques. In many countries, SO2 is being removed from flue gases by Keywords: different methods. Oil shale is shale that contains organic matter of incomplete conversion to oil. Oil Energy mineral shale can be burned directly to generate electricity. It can be upgraded to increase its organic Mineral processing content. It can be converted to oil or gas through pyrolysis. Nuclear fuel is a material that contains Fossil fuel fissionable elements such as Uranium, Plutonium, and Thorium. Uranium is widely distributed in Coal mineral ores. Natural uranium contains 0.7% U235 (fissile isotope) and 99.3% U238. The U235 Oil shale must be increased up to 8% to be a fuel for energy reactor while the weapon-grade must contain at least 90% U235. 1. Introduction • Conventional (wood, coal, oil, natural gas, and electricity).
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Liquid Fuels Produced from Estonian Oil Shale
    Greenhouse gas emissions from liquid fuels produced from Estonian oil shale Prepared for European Commission - Joint Research Center November 19th, 2010 Adam R. Brandt Department of Energy Resources Engineering Stanford University Green Earth Sciences 065, 367 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305-2220 Email: [email protected] Phone: +1-650-724-8251 January 18th, 2011 1 Estonian oil shale Oil shale is broad classification for sedimentary rocks that contains fossil organic matter called kerogen. Kerogen is believed to be the source material from which naturally occur- ring oil and gas were formed over geologic time [1, 2]. Kerogen is made of organic macro- molecules, and can be burned directly to release heat. Kerogen can also be converted to liquid and gaseous fuels through retorting processes. Commonly, retorting involves heat- ing in an oxygen-free environment, but other chemical reaction schemes can be utilized (e.g., heating with supplemental hydrogen) [2]. There are two varieties of Estonian oil shale, Argillite and Kukersite [3]. Kukersite is the primary type of oil shale mined in Estonia. Oil shale properties vary significantly across formations, as well as within formations, with some layers being sub-economic due to low energy density (i.e., low kerogen content) [3]. Oil shale consumption is the largest source of CO2 emissions in Estonia, representing some 72% of combustion CO2 emissions [4]. Total consumption of oil shale in Estonia in 2002 was 116.5 PJ, of which 88.3 PJ were used for electricity and heat generation and 25.9 PJ were used for oil production [5], with the remainder used for cement production feedstock.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 – Professor Siirde
    DG INTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policy A study on the EU oil shale industry - viewed in the light of the Estonian experience Study (IP/A/ITRE/FWC/2005-60/SC4) IP/A/ITRE/ST/2006-10 DRAFT version This study was requested by the European Parliament's committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) Only published in English. Authors: Dr Juraj Francu, Dr Barbra Harvie, Dr Ben Laenen, Materials Department Professor Andres Siirde, Professor Mihkel Veiderma, Administrator: Camilla Bursi Policy Department Economy and Science DG Internal Policies European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 - ATR 00L008 B-1047 Brussels Tel: +32-2-2832233 Fax: +32-2-2846929 E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in March 2007. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and receives a copy. E-mail: [email protected]. Draft version Contents Page Foreword iii Summary iv 1 Oil shale resources 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Reserves 2 1.3 Resources 2 1.4 Strategic significance 2 1.5 Global and European resources 3 2 The technology of processing oil shale 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Mining 7 2.3 Thermal processing of oil shale 8 2.4 Oil shale retorting techniques 9 2.5 Future trends 11 3 The past and future development of oil shales 13 3.1 Introduction 13 3.2 USA 13 3.3 Estonia 15 3.4 Scotland
    [Show full text]
  • LD5655.V856 1989.G627.Pdf
    The Sorptive Behavior of Organic (Üompounds on Retortcd ()iI Shale by Adi] Noshirwan (iodrej Gregory D. Boardman, Chairman (Zivil lingineering (ABSTR1\(ZT) Oil shale is a valuable natural resource of oil. The United States has only 5% of the known world reserves of recoverable crude oil and about 73% of the known world reserves of recoverable oil shale. Before there can be full-scale commercial development of oil shale, the problems associated with the large amounts of wastes generated by the processing of the shale must be solved. The wastcs have a complex eheinical matrix. lt is felt that the spent shale can be used as a sorbent to either treat or pretreat the contaminated process waters or could be codisposcd with the process waters, Quite extensive work has been done in exploring this altemative with respect to inorganic constituents, but that with organic constituents has been mainly restricted to the measurement of total orgauie carbon. This study was done to base the analysis of the suitability of the spent shale as a sorbent upon individual compounds so that a more fundamental understanding could be ob- tained as to how familics of conrpounds behave. Single- and multisohite batch sorption isothcrrn experirnents performed on Antrim spent shale from Michigan indic.;¤ted a consistcnt sor‘;‘—live behavior by the shale with respect to the four sorbates used in the study Y——- Pl:·.·nol. 2·~liydroxynaphthalene (HN), 2,3,5—Trimethylphcnol (TP) and l,2,3.4-Tctrahydroquinoline (”l”llQ). The sorptive capacity of the spent shale was least for Phenol and greatest for Tll(_), with the order being Phenol ·< TP < [IN <Tl](_).
    [Show full text]