The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN.

Published by: IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi

Copyright: © 2018 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.

Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder.

Citation: Soorae, P. S. (ed.) (2018). Global Reintroduction Perspectives: 2018. Case studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland and Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi, UAE. xiv + 286pp.

6th Edition

ISBN: 978-2-8317-1901-6 (PDF) 978-2-8317-1902-3 (print edition)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.08.en

Cover photo: Clockwise starting from top-left: I. Reticulated python, Singapore © ACRES II. Trout , © Gunther Schmida (Murray-Darling Basin Authority) III. Yellow-spotted mountain newt, Iran © M. Sharifi IV. Scimitar-horned oryx, Chad © Justin Chuven V. Oregon silverspot butterfly, USA © U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VI. Two-colored cymbidium orchid, Singapore © Tim Wing Yam VII. Mauritius fody, Mauritius © Jacques de Spéville

Cover design & layout by: Pritpal S. Soorae, IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group

Printed by: Arafah Printing Press LLC, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Download at: www.iucnsscrsg.org www.iucn.org/resources/publications

ii Fishes

Reintroduction of the trout cod in southeastern Australia: perseverance pays off

Mark Lintermans1, John D. Koehn2 & Jarod P. Lyon2

1 – Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia [email protected] 2 - Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, 123 Brown St., Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia [email protected]; [email protected]

Introduction Trout cod (Maccullochella macquariensis) is a charismatic Percichythid fish of the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) in southeastern Australia. The MDB is home to >2 million people, covers 1,055,600 km2 and is Australia’s ‘food bowl’. Agricultural production in the MDB is on average 35 - 40% of the total gross value of Australia’s agricultural production with irrigated agriculture using over 80% of the water resource. Trout cod is a relatively long-lived (>20 years), large bodied (max. size 16 kg and 850 mm total length) apex predator strongly associated with instream structural woody habitats, which exhibits limited movements, especially as adults. Although long suspected as a distinct taxon, it was only formally described as a species different to (M. peeli) in 1972. It is now recognized as one of four cod species in , all of which are formally listed as nationally threatened. Trout cod is listed as endangered nationally, and in each State/Territory in which it still occurs (New South Wales (NSW), Victoria (Vic), Australian Capital Territory (ACT) (Lintermans et al., 2005). The species is also listed as Endangered (C2a) by the IUCN and by the Australian Society for Fish Biology.

Goals Goal 1: Develop hatchery breeding programs for trout cod to provide juvenile fish for reintroductions. Goal 2: Establish additional self-sustaining populations of trout cod throughout its range. Goal 3: Conserve the two key trout cod populations in the and Seven Creeks. Goal 4: Rehabilitate habitat for trout cod at selected sites throughout its range. Goal 5: Undertake research to provide new knowledge to support conservation Trout cod © Gunther Schmida management.

48 Fishes

Success Indicators Indicator 1: Hatchery programs exist that regularly produce fingerlings for stocking. Indicator 2: Fish are stocked in suitable locations across the species range. Indicator 3: Self-sustaining populations are established in all jurisdictions within current range. Indicator 4: Successful habitat interventions occur that support self-sustaining and stocked individuals. Indicator 5: New knowledge for key ecological parameters to support for trout cod conservation.

Project Summary Feasibility: Trout cod previously occurred across much of the southern MDB from ~200 - 900 m elevation. The species was a popular target for recreational fishing and not easily distinguished from Murray cod by anglers. The species declined dramatically over two decades post 1950 as a result of river regulation; habitat destruction and removal; introduction of alien fish species such as carp (Cyprinus carpio) and redfin perch (Perca fluviatilis); and overfishing (both commercial and recreational) (Koehn et al., 2013). Rivers in the southern MDB became increasingly regulated post-WW2 with the construction of weirs and dams for irrigation. By 1990, trout cod had been reduced to a single natural population along approximately 50 km of the Murray River and two historic translocated populations: one within its natural range along 10 km of Seven Creeks; and one in a coastal drainage outside the natural range (Cataract Reservoir) - see figure 1. Trout cod was one of the first freshwater fish species formally listed as nationally endangered in 1980. However, it was not until the mid Figure 1. Changes in trout cod distribution showing the former widespread historic distribution, the decline to just two locations by 1990, and the extent of range recovery by 2012 (from Koehn et al., 2013).

49 Fishes

-1980s that recovery efforts commenced, with two state fisheries agencies (NSW and Victoria) conducting research into hatchery breeding and commencing restocking programs.

Implementation: The first national recovery plan for trout cod was completed in 1994, with subsequent plans published in 1998 and 2008. These plans have driven and coordinated a Installing woody habitat © Martin Casey range of management interventions across this extended timeframe. An important early action was the legislative protection from recreational harvest through fishing closures and regulations on the two remnant populations, and the provision of education materials that allowed anglers to distinguish between the morphologically similar trout cod and Murray cod. A targeted research program provided important information on breeding requirements in captivity (for hatchery production), movement ecology and habitat use. Captive-breeding programs were undertaken with regular, small-scale stocking from the late 1980s. Production increased significantly in the 1990s with an average of 109,350 fingerlings stocked annually between 1996 and 2005 across its range. Production has since declined (on average 32,450 stocked annually from 2006 - 2016) but by 2016, >1.71 million hatchery-bred fingerlings had been released. The stocking program was aided by the development and use of a population model and a structured stocking regime. Habitat rehabilitation occurred through the reinstatement of structural woody habitat at many sites in the MDB, and along with provision of environmental water, increased fish passage, improvements to river health, and education and enforcement programs funded by a variety of agencies, have all built on the early management activities.

The formation of Australia’s first Freshwater Fish Recovery Team was critical to a coordinated recovery program, and contained a mix of state and federal scientists, hatchery biologists, managers and conservation organizations that shared information, discussed problems, and forged common approaches. Unfortunately, national funding for management actions and meetings of the Recovery Team ceased in the early 2000s. Since 2012 there has been a diversification of hatchery objectives to include the establishment of recreational fisheries for the species in nine NSW impoundments and two Victorian lakes. Unfortunately, hatchery production has not increased to accommodate this extra demand for fingerlings, with many hatchery-produced fingerlings now used to establish these recreational fisheries. The return of trout cod as a recreational fishing target is supported in the long-term, but hatchery production of fingerlings must be increased to establish further populations to reduce conservation risk and avoid impacts on the existing stocked populations.

50 Fishes

Post-release monitoring: Regular monitoring of the status of the two remaining wild populations and hatchery releases commenced in the early 1990s, with the primary aim of detecting survival of stocked fish and then any wild recruitment in these populations. In the early years, relatively small numbers of stocked individuals were detected; not surprising given the initial small numbers of fish released annually, and potential movement of individuals away from the stocking sites. Ad hoc angler reports provided valuable indications that stocked fish were surviving and growing. There was no evidence that any of the wild populations were continuing to decline, although emergency interventions were required after bushfire threatened the population in the Seven Creeks catchment. The Murray River population appears to be more abundant than originally thought with evidence of expansion. Wild recruitment has been detected in a number of catchments (Goulburn, Ovens, Mid and Upper Murrumbidgee, Cotter) between the late 1990s and mid 2000s (Lyon et al., 2012; Koehn et al., 2013). Comprehensive monitoring of the lower Ovens River demonstrated the benefits of a long-term stocking program, with wide variation in the contribution of individual stocking events to the resultant population (Lyon et al., 2012). Genetic analysis of upper Murrumbidgee cod larvae from 2011 - 2013 found hybridization between Trout cod and Murray cod, (Couch et al., 2016) demonstrating the problem of re- establishing a threatened species into the range of an established congeneric.

Major difficulties faced Ensuring adequate threatened species funding for a recovery team and the application and monitoring of management actions. Transitioning from small-scale (temporal and spatial) stockings to large, longer -term, more successful stocking programs. Sustaining hatchery production in the face of resource constraints and competing demand for hatchery facilities (for other recreational species) and the diversion of hatchery fish to the recreational trout cod fisheries without additional resources to secure conservation programs. Obtaining angler recognition that reintroduction is a long-term process that extends beyond simply releasing hatchery-bred individuals (i.e. regular natural recruitment is required before fishing restrictions can be relaxed). Unforeseen climatic threats to recovery program (a millennium drought) which set back the project as harsh environmental conditions led to partial loss of some stocked populations though unexpected fish kills.

Major lessons learned Recovery of a large-bodied, long-lived, late-maturing species takes considerable time. Availability of dedicated hatchery breeding programs has been essential. Existence of long-term monitoring programs and development of a population model and adaptive management has allowed refinement of reintroduction approaches . Explicit consideration of natural (but extreme) environmental perturbations such as drought should be part of reintroduction planning. The acquiring of key ecological knowledge and the coordination by a national recovery team allowed for a strategic and dedicated approach to species’ recovery.

51 Fishes

Success of project

Highly Successful Successful Partially Successful Failure √

Reason(s) for success/failure: A coordinated, multi-jurisdictional approach across the species range. An extensive scientific research program to fill ecological knowledge-gaps for the species. Availability of hatchery facilities to produce fingerlings for reintroduction. The development of a population model to guide reintroduction strategies. Long-term commitment by individual scientists and conservation managers.

References Bearlin, A.R., Schreiber, E.S.G., Nicol, S.J., Starfield, A.M. & Todd, C.R. (2002) Identifying the weakest link: simulating adaptive management of the reintroduction of a threatened fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1709-1716.

Koehn, J.D., Lintermans, M, Lyon, J.P., Ingram, B.A., Gilligan, D.M., Todd, C.R. & Douglas, J.W. (2013) Recovery of the endangered trout cod Maccullochella macquariensis: What have we achieved in more than 25 years? Marine and Freshwater Research 64: 822-837.

Lintermans, M., Rowland, S.J., Koehn, J., Butler, G., Simpson, R. & Wooden, I. (2005). The status, threats and management of freshwater cod species in Australia. Pp 15-29 In: Lintermans, M. and Phillips, B. (eds) 2005. Management of Murray Cod in the Murray-Darling Basin: Statement, Recommendations and Supporting Papers. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, Australia 128 pp.

Lyon, J.P., Todd, C., Nicol, S.J., MacDonald, A., Stoessel, D., Ingram, B.A., Barker, R.J. & Bradshaw, C.J.A. (2012). Reintroduction success of threatened Australian trout cod (Maccullochella macquariensis) based on growth and reproduction. Marine and Freshwater Research 63: 598-605.

Couch A.J., Unmack P.J., Dyer F.J., & Lintermans M. (2016) Who's your mama? Riverine hybridisation of threatened freshwater Trout Cod and Murray Cod. PeerJ 4:e2593; https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2593

52