DOCSLIB.ORG

Trout Cod (Maccullochella Macquariensis) Distribution in Victoria (DSE 2002) Environment, Victoria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trout Cod (Maccullochella Macquariensis) Distribution in Victoria (DSE 2002) Environment, Victoria #38 This Action Statement was first published in 1993 and remains current. This Trout Cod version has been prepared for web publication. It Maccullochella macquariensis retains the original text of the action statement, although contact information, the distribution map and the illustration may have been updated. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 Published by the Department of Sustainability and Trout Cod (Maccullochella macquariensis) Distribution in Victoria (DSE 2002) Environment, Victoria. 8 Nicholson Street, Description and Distribution Weir, and originates from fish translocated East Melbourne, The Trout Cod (Maccullochella macquariensis from the Goulburn River in 1921 and 1922. Victoria 3002 Australia (Cuvier 1829)), is a large, elongate, deep- The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (CNR) and its This publication may be of bodied fish. They have an overhanging assistance to you but the upper jaw, and usually a dark stripe predecessors have released fish into State of Victoria and its through the eye. Their colouring is Koetong, Hughes, Ryans and Buffalo Creeks employees do not guarantee generally blue-grey with small dark-grey to and the Coliban and Broken Rivers. There that the publication is black spots or dashes on the dorsal surface are also unconfirmed reports of Trout Cod in without flaw of any kind or and upper sides, and light grey to white on a number of waters, including the King, is wholly appropriate for the ventral surface. The maximum recorded upper Ovens, and lower Goulburn Rivers, your particular purposes and Cutting, Narial, Cudgewa, Morses and and therefore disclaims all weight is 16 kg, though there have been Broken Creeks. liability for any error, loss unconfirmed reports of fish twice this size or other consequence which being caught in the past. For a more In NSW, Trout Cod occur naturally in the may arise from you relying detailed description see Cadwallader & Murray River from below Yarrawonga Weir on any information in this Backhouse (1983). down to the Barmah Forest. They have been publication. The distribution of Trout Cod is more released into the upper Murray River near restricted than in the past (Cadwallader & Jingellic and Tintaldra, the Murrumbidgee ISSN 1448-9902 Gooley 1984). They were once widespread River near Cooma and Narrandera, and into in the Murray-Darling system, mostly in Talbingo and Cataract Dams. There are the upper reaches (e.g. Mitta Mitta, Ovens, unconfirmed reports of Trout Cod in the King and Goulburn Rivers), though Macquarie River. Trout Cod have also been recorded as far downstream as Mannum in released into Bendora Dam in the ACT. South Australia (Cadwallader & Backhouse The habitat of the Trout Cod at Seven Creeks 1983, Cadwallader & Gooley 1984). In in Victoria consists of deep pools separated Victoria the only known viable population by sections of fast-flowing waters with steep occurs in Seven Creeks, upstream of Euroa drops and rocky chutes. The substrata between Gooram Falls and Polly McQuinns consist mostly of bedrock, boulders, gravel and sand. Instream cover in the form of woody snags and • the original distribution is not known accurately, since overhanging banks is present (Cadwallader 1979, it was formally recognised as a species separate from Cadwallader & Backhouse 1983, Newall & Mueck 1990). Murray Cod only in 1972 (Berra & Weatherly 1972). The habitat in the Murray River, where the only other The broad range is described in Cadwallader & known viable population in Australia occurs, generally Gooley (1984); consists of deeper, slower-flowing waters, with a mud or • a large proportion of Victoria's streams have been sand substratum. modified (Mitchell 1990), so that it is not possible to determine the conditions Trout Cod require by Conservation Status examining conditions in rivers in which they Current Status originally occurred; and Koehn & Morison (1990) Endangered • As Trout Cod did not naturally occur in Seven Creeks Harris (1987) Endangered in the stretch where they are now found, but were Scientific Advisory Committee (1991) Threatened introduced from a population in the Goulburn River, extrapolation of habitat requirements from this area The Trout Cod has been listed as a threatened taxon may not be very realistic. underSchedule2 of the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act There are so few Trout Cod remaining in Victoria that they 1988. should not be put at risk by activities likely to result in death or reduced viability. This restricts the types of research possible, Reasons for Conservation Status which in turn limits the amount and type of information that The population size and the distribution of Trout Cod have can be obtained about their requirements. decreased (Cadwallader & Gooley 1984). They were once Potential threats to Trout Cod arise from processes that widespread in the Murray-Darling River system, but have damage the aquatic environment, including sedimentation, declined markedly. In Victoria, only 170 fish were found in removal of riparian vegetation and instream habitat, changed an intensive survey of Seven Creeks in 1991 (Anderson flow or water temperature regime, and deterioration in water 1991). quality (e.g. reduction in dissolved oxygen concentration, Angling, introduction of trout, and activities that damage increased turbidity, increased concentration of nutrients and rivers, including sedimentation, dams, and river biocides). A wide range of activities in catchments may cause improvement works (e.g. desnagging and channel these threats. Some of these are clearing, overgrazing, stock modification) are all thought to have contributed to the damage (especially in or near rivers or drainage lines), biocide decline of Trout Cod (Scientific Advisory Committee 1991). spraying, roadmaking, weir or dam cleaning or construction, In its final recommendation, the Scientific Advisory changes in the operation of existing dams, water extraction, Committee (1991) determined that Trout Cod are: runoff from construction sites, fire, and river management • in a demonstrable state of decline which is likely works such as desnagging or channel modification. to result in extinction; Protection of Trout Cod habitat must also take into account • significantly prone to future threats which are activities that occur upstream of the actual stretch of river likely to result in extinction, and inhabited by the fish, including tributary streams. • very rare in terms of abundance or distribution. Trout may pose a threat through predation or other competitive interactions. Major Conservation Objectives Angling for other species of fish in rivers where the Trout Cod The long-term objective is to ensure that the species is occur may result in anglers accidentally hooking Trout Cod. secure and self-sustaining within its former range. Short The difficulty in distinguishing Trout Cod from Murray Cod term objectives are to: may lead to anglers mistakenly killing Trout Cod if angling is • ensure that the population of Trout Cod in Seven permitted in waters where Trout Cod occur. Trout Cod have Creeks is secure, increases or remains stable in been found to hybridise with Murray Cod in Cataract Dam and numbers and/or distribution, and continues to the Murray River in NSW. produce young; • expand the current range in Victoria by Seven Creeks Population establishing breeding populations at other As this is the only viable population of Trout Cod in Victoria, locations within their former range; the entire wild Victorian population could be lost through a • initiate research into the ecological requirements catastrophic event such as a wildfire or toxic spill into the creek of Trout Cod by 1993. or through degradation of the habitat, for example by erosion from the catchment or the stream bed and banks, changed flow Management Issues regime, or a deterioration in water quality. The Seven Creeks population, and thus its habitat, needs to be given a very high level of protection to ensure its safety as far as possible and Ecological Issues Specific to the Taxon reduce risk to an absolute minimum. Protection of the Trout Cod in the wild is difficult because: Changes in the management or use of the creek or catchment • for the most part, its ecological requirements and may affect Trout Cod, and thus should be assessed for tolerances are not known; potential impact prior to implementation. Potential threats 2 include forest clearing in the upper catchment, increased these recommendations over the entire catchment would, water abstraction from Seven Creeks, and cleaning out besides protecting the creeks and Trout Cod habitat, have Polly McQuinns Weir. beneficial effects by reducing soil erosion, and increasing The existing nutrient enrichment of Seven Creeks may productivity of the land in the long term (though it would also threaten Trout Cod, especially in summer when there is require extra work by landholders in the shorter term). little flow (Newall 1990). Measures required to protect Trout Cod in all creeks where it Several natural and artificial barriers in Seven Creeks in becomes established will protect the habitat of other aquatic effect divide the population into several sub-populations. species and communities. Since Trout Cod can move downstream but not back up Care will need to be taken when establishing other populations past these barriers, the upper reaches may eventually be of Trout Cod in relation to the potential for hybridisation with uninhabited by Trout Cod. Murray Cod. The results of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 13: Broken River Catchment
    13 Broken River Catchment Argus, 15 January 1924 True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin 13-1 NORTHERN BLACKFISH Noting J. T. Anderson’s remarks on the subject, “R.G.K.” (Richmond) says that he has just had a “fortnight’s fishing in the Broken River and various creeks around Lima (via Benalla) Although he had good sport with Murray cod, bream (Macquarie perch), and catfish, which he remarks is a far finer table fish than is generally realised, he noticed, too, how numerous were the blackfish. He must have hooked over a hundred, but returned them all to the river, as according to the Game Laws, they may not be kept under 8 inches, and very few of these were eight inches, many as small as four inches. Had “R.G.K.” known, he might have kept these fish, because an exception is made about them. The regulation reads:- “Blackfish, except those in streams flowing north from the Great Dividing Range, 8 1/2 inches.” These blackfish are a smaller species or variety, and the Fisheries department imposes no conditions in regard to them. Argus, 15 January 1924 13-2 True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin Figure 13.1 The Broken River Catchment showing major waterways and key localities. True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin 13-3 13.1 Early European Accounts The Broken River rises at the foot of Mt Buller north of Mansfield and, travelling west, collects water from tributaries originating in the Strathbogie and Wombat Ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Region
    Section 5 Northern Region 109 5.1 Northern Region overview ............................................................................................... 111 5.2 Victorian Murray system .................................................................................................. 114 5.2.1 Barmah Forest ...................................................................................................... 116 5.2.2 Gunbower Creek and Forest ................................................................................ 119 5.2.3 Central Murray wetlands ...................................................................................... 124 5.2.4 Hattah Lakes ........................................................................................................ 129 5.2.5 Lower Murray wetlands ........................................................................................ 132 5.2.6 Lindsay, Mulcra and Wallpolla islands .................................................................. 137 5.3 Ovens system ................................................................................................................... 141 5.4 Goulburn system .............................................................................................................. 145 5.4.1 Goulburn River ..................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2 Goulburn wetlands ............................................................................................... 152 5.5 Broken system .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie Perch Refuge Project – Final Report for Lachlan CMA Author: Luke Pearce, Fisheries Conservation Manager, NSW DPI, Albury
    Published by NSW Trade & Investment, Department of Primary Industries First published May 2013 Title: Macquarie Perch Refuge Project – Final Report for Lachlan CMA Author: Luke Pearce, Fisheries Conservation Manager, NSW DPI, Albury. Print: ISBN 978 1 74256 500 2 Web: ISBN: 978 1 74256 501 9 Acknowledgements I thank the Lachlan Catchment Management Authority for providing the funding for the project. I would like to acknowledge the following staff, Fin Martin and Geoff Minchin for their input, assistance, advice and support on this project. The following staff in Fisheries NSW who worked on the project and made it possible; John Pursey, Dean Gilligan, Trevor Daly, Allan Lugg, Sarah Fairfull, Justin Stanger, Tim McGarry, Martin Asmus, Matthew McLellan, Lachie Jess and Antonia Creese. I thank the Recreational Fishing Trust for their ongoing support and funding for the Macquarie Perch captive breeding program; without it there would not be fish to stock into the refuge site. I would also like to acknowledge the Central Acclimatisation Society, in particular Karl Schaerf and Peter Byron for their ongoing support of the project and threatened native fish. TRIM reference: PUB13/61 Jobtrack 12067 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Trade and Investment, Regional Infrastructure and Services, 2013. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (May 2013). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of the Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaspe River Reach 2 Environmental Watering Plan
    CAMPASPE RIVER REACH 2 ENVIRONMENTAL WATERING PLAN PREPARED FOR THE GOULBURN-MURRAY WATER CONNECTIONS PROJECT JULY 2013 Campaspe River Reach 2 Environmental Watering Plan DOCUMENT HISTORY AND STATUS Version Date Issued Prepared By Reviewed By Date Approved Version 1 14 May 2013 Michelle Maher Emer Campbell 20 May 2013 Version 2 21 May 2013 Michelle Maher G-MW CP ETAC 7 June 2013 Version 3 13 June 2013 Michelle Maher G-MW CP ERP 12 July 2013 Version 4 16 July 2013 Michelle Maher G-MW CP ERP 22 July 2013 Version 5 22 July 2013 Michelle Maher G-MW CP ETAC TBC DISTRIBUTION Version Date Quantity Issued To Version 1 14 May 2013 Email Emer Campbell Version 2 21 May 2013 Email G-MW CP ETAC Version 3 13 June 2013 Email G-MW CP ERP Version 4 16 July 2013 Email G-MW CP ERP Version 5 22 July 2013 Email G-MW CP ETAC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT Printed: 22 July 2013 Last saved: 22 July 2013 10:00 AM File name: NCCMA-81689 – Campaspe River Reach 2 EWP Authors: Michelle Maher Name of organisation: North Central CMA Name of document: Campaspe River Reach 2 Environmental Watering Plan Document version: Version 4, Final Document manager: 81689 For further information on any of the information contained within this document contact: North Central Catchment Management Authority PO Box 18 Huntly Vic 3551 T: 03 5440 1800 F: 03 5448 7148 E: [email protected] www.nccma.vic.gov.au © North Central Catchment Management Authority, 2013 Front cover photo: Campaspe River upstream of Runnymeade, Winter High Flow, 14 November 2011, Darren White, North Central CMA The Campaspe River Reach 2 Environmental Watering Plan is a working document, compiled from the best available information.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthy Waterways and Catchments Progress Snapshot
    Healthy waterways and catchments Progress snapshot December 2019 Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Our record investment in waterways and catchments Taking action Intensive on- Target ground works such achieved We have invested $222 million over four years to as vegetation, Waterways and weed and pest catchments are improve the health of our waterways and catchments management, healthier and erosion control, Recovery more resilient to instream habitat challenges. – Victoria’s largest ever investment. With this funding, improvements and growth and water for Place-based we are working to protect the rivers and landscapes the environment actions drop to a Planning management. maintenance level. that people love and use. and target setting The wellbeing and prosperity of Victorian communities depend “In coming decades, Identifying on healthy waterways and catchments, yet so many of our most long-term our waterways will be outcomes with loved rivers, estuaries and wetlands have been degraded over under pressure from partners and time. Increasing urban development, climate change and a lack of communities. awareness about the activities that affect waterway health are putting increased population our waterways and catchments at risk. and a changing climate. We have made a long- This investment is helping to deliver Water for Victoria, our plan to term commitment to Dec 2019 manage water to create more liveable and thriving communities for all restore and improve Victorians, now and into the future. waterway and catchment health, so we can meet Our approach focuses on: 2.5 YEARS 10 YEARS 30 YEARS these challenges now and strengthening local relationships for future generations.” putting community at the centre of decision-making Environmental condition Management effort Community benefit range Minister for Water Lisa Neville delivering a wide range of waterway and catchment projects for Victoria’s cities, towns and regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading Rules Controlling Irrigation Water Movement
    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES IMPACTS OF WATER TRADE ON AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEMS Trading rules controlling irrigation water movement July 2007 IMPACTS OF WATER TRADE ON AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEMS Trading rules controlling irrigation water movement For further information contact: Mike Morris Primary Industries Research Victoria Department of Primary Industries Private Bag 1 Ferguson Road Tatura Victoria 3616 Phone: (03) 5833 5283 Fax: (03) 5833 5299 Email: [email protected] Published by Primary Industries Research Victoria Department of Primary Industries, Tatura Private Bag 1 Ferguson Road Tatura Victoria 3616 July 2007 Find more information about DPI on the Internet at: www.dpi.vic.gov.au ISBN 978-1-74199-219-9 (print) ISBN 978-1-74199-220-5 (online) Disclaimer The information contained in this report is offered by the State of Victoria, through its Department of Primary Industries, solely to provide information. While the information contained in this report has been formulated with due care by the Department of Primary Industries, the State of Victoria, its servants and agents accept no responsibility for any error, omission, loss or other consequence which may arise from any person relying on anything contained in this paper. © State of Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, 2007 Executive summary This report presents an overview of water trading rules controlling irrigation water movement and information on the historical background preceding and underpinning current rules and regulations. Irrigation water trade ocurs under a Cap on consumptive entitlements implemented in 1995 and administered by the MDBC. Since imposition of the Cap, consumptive allocations have been progressively reduced to improve the condition of riverine ecosystems, and further reductions are likely.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Region
    Section 5 Northern Region 109 5.1 Northern Region overview ............................................................................................... 111 5.2 Victorian Murray system .................................................................................................. 114 5.2.1 Barmah Forest ...................................................................................................... 116 5.2.2 Gunbower Creek and Forest ................................................................................ 119 5.2.3 Central Murray wetlands ...................................................................................... 124 5.2.4 Hattah Lakes ........................................................................................................ 129 5.2.5 Lower Murray wetlands ........................................................................................ 132 5.2.6 Lindsay, Mulcra and Wallpolla islands .................................................................. 137 5.3 Ovens system ................................................................................................................... 141 5.4 Goulburn system .............................................................................................................. 145 5.4.1 Goulburn River ..................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2 Goulburn wetlands ............................................................................................... 152 5.5 Broken system .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Control Spring 2020 Newsletter
    Spring 2020 Taking Control Support, information and resources for individuals and communities impacted by wild dogs Above: Wild dog exclusion fencing contructed with Bushfire Recovery Funding. Inset: Combined Bushfire Recovery Fund and DeFence fencing across eastern Victoria. Source: DELWP. Bushfire recovery aids wild dog control Significantly, more than half of the BRF fencing The Community Wild Dog Control comprises Wild Dog Exclusion Fencing (WDEF), bringing Coordinators and members of the the total amount of publicly-funded WDEF erected in both regions in 2019-20 to 516km. (Seventy-five km of Wild Dog Program have been WDEF was constructed under the DeFence Project, helping farmers replace fences which was funded by the Commonwealth Government’s lost in the 2019-20 bushfires, Communities Combating Pests and Weed Impacts strengthening wild dog control in During Drought Program (see page 4).) These stretches of WDEF (see image above) are helping the process. farmers protect livestock from the threat of wild dog predation which can increase after bushfire. The Community Wild Dog Coordinators (CWDCCs) and members of the Wild Dog Program (WDP) have helped Further assistance is being offered by the WDP which farmers access funding under the Victorian has secured funding under Work for Victoria to hire an Government’s Bushfire Recovery Fencing (BRF) program. additional four Wild Dog Controllers (WDCs) for the next few months. Almost every application has been processed, resulting in the construction of 584km of new fencing in Gippsland and 277km in the Hume. delwp.vic.gov.au Spring 2020 Above: CWDCCs, Lucy-Anne Cobby, Brian Dowley and Mick Freeman.
    [Show full text]
  • Supervising Scientist Report River Reaches, Historical Channel
    supervising scientist report 208 River Reaches, Historical Channel Changes and Recommended Methods to Improve Macquarie Perch Habitat on Hughes Creek, Victoria Wayne D Erskine It is Supervising Scientist policy for reports in the SSR series to be reviewed as part of the publications process. This Supervising Scientist Report has been formally refereed by two external independent experts. Author of this report: Dr Wayne D Erskine – Hydrological and Geomorphological Processes Group, Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: Erskine WD 2015. River Reaches, Historical Channel Changes and Recommended Methods to Improve Macquarie Perch Habitat on Hughes Creek, Victoria, March 2015. Supervising Scientist Report 208, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT. The Supervising Scientist is part of the Australian Government Department of the Environment © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2015. SSR208 is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ 1325-1554 (online) ISBN-13: 978-1-921069-26-0 environment.gov.au/science/supervising-scientist The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria
    Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria R.C. DeRose, I.P.Prosser, L.J. Wilkinson, A.O. Hughes and W.J. Young CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra Technical Report 11/03, March 2003 CSIRO LAND and WATER Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria R.C. DeRose, I.P. Prosser, L.J. Wilkinson, A.O. Hughes and W.J. Young CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra Technical Report 11/03, March 2003 Copyright ©2003 CSIRO Land and Water To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO Land and Water. Important Disclaimer To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO Land and Water (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. ISSN 1446-6163 Table of Contents Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coliban Water Corporate Plan 2020 2025
    WATER SECURITY AND ZERO CARBON WATER IS A PRECIOUS RESOURCE HEALTHY PEOPLE AND ENVIRONMENT WATER IS ESSENTIAL TO SUSTAIN LIFE PROSPEROUS ECONOMIES WATER UNDERPINS ECONOMIC PROSPERITY Corporate Plan GREEN AND ACTIVE COMMUNITIES WATER UNDERPINS LIVEABILITY 2020–2025 OUR REGION LEGEND TRADITIONAL LAND OWNERS DJA DJA WURRUNG CLANS ABORIGINAL CORPORATION Cohuna TAUNGURUNG LAND AND WATERS COUNCIL (ABORIGINAL CORPORATION) (TLAWC) MURRAY RIVER YORTA YORTA NATION Leitchville ABORIGINAL CORPORATION Macorna CURRENTLY NOT REPRESENTED BY A Gunbower REGISTERED ABORIGINAL CORPORATION Pyramid Hill WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS Echuca CAMPASPE Boort COLIBAN Mitiamo Mysia GOULBURN GROUNDWATER Jarklin Lockington Borung LODDON Wychitella Rochester MURRAY Korong Vale Dingee WIMMERA Serpentine Wedderburn SEWER Elmore Raywood WATER NON POTABLE Inglewood WATER (UNTREATED) Bridgewater Goornong RIVER AVOCA RIVER Sebastian RECYCLED WATER CAMPASPE Marong LODDON RIVER Bendigo Tarnagulla Bealiba Axedale Laanecoorie LAKE EPPALOCK Dunolly Heathcote Maldon Harcourt Tooborac Castlemaine Campbells Creek Chewton Elphinstone Mildura Newstead Fryerstown Taradale Guildford Malmsbury MALMSBURY Kyneton Echuca LAURISTON SheppartonShepppartpar oon WodongaWodoododoonganga UPPER COLIBAN Tylden HorshamHorsham BendigoBenBeenndigddiigo WangarattaW StawellStawell Castlemaine NORTH AraratArarat Kyneton victoriavictoria HamiltonHamilton 08,000 16,000 32,000 BallaratBallarat MelbourneMelbourne BairnsdaleBairnsdale Trentham GeelongGeelong SaleSale METRES Portland MorwellMorwell Warrnambool ColacColac COLIBAN WATER | CORPORATE PLAN 2020–2025 CONTENTS OUR CHALLENGE 2 OUR RESPONSE TO CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) 3 WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO 4 STRATEGY 2030 8 Strategic direction 1: Water security and zero carbon 8 Strategic direction 2: Healthy people and environment 14 Strategic direction 3: Prosperous economies 22 Strategic direction 4: Green and active communities 28 Business enablers 32 OUR FINANCIALS 33 APPENDICES 39 This photo was taken prior to coronavirus (COVID-19) restrictions and 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]