Chapter 13: Broken River Catchment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 13: Broken River Catchment 13 Broken River Catchment Argus, 15 January 1924 True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin 13-1 NORTHERN BLACKFISH Noting J. T. Anderson’s remarks on the subject, “R.G.K.” (Richmond) says that he has just had a “fortnight’s fishing in the Broken River and various creeks around Lima (via Benalla) Although he had good sport with Murray cod, bream (Macquarie perch), and catfish, which he remarks is a far finer table fish than is generally realised, he noticed, too, how numerous were the blackfish. He must have hooked over a hundred, but returned them all to the river, as according to the Game Laws, they may not be kept under 8 inches, and very few of these were eight inches, many as small as four inches. Had “R.G.K.” known, he might have kept these fish, because an exception is made about them. The regulation reads:- “Blackfish, except those in streams flowing north from the Great Dividing Range, 8 1/2 inches.” These blackfish are a smaller species or variety, and the Fisheries department imposes no conditions in regard to them. Argus, 15 January 1924 13-2 True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin Figure 13.1 The Broken River Catchment showing major waterways and key localities. True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin 13-3 13.1 Early European Accounts The Broken River rises at the foot of Mt Buller north of Mansfield and, travelling west, collects water from tributaries originating in the Strathbogie and Wombat Ranges. After passing through Benalla the Broken flows northwest, splitting into two primary watercourses, the Broken River which discharges into the Goulburn River at Shepparton and the Broken Creek which enters the Murray River near Barmah. On November 29, 1824 Hume and Hovell camped at the Broken River near Samaria. They apparently did not consider the waterway to be of sufficient significance to give it a name. It also appears that they did not fish the stream, or if they did they made no record if they encountered fish in it (Bland, 1831). On October 13, 1836 Major Thomas Mitchell camped on the Broken River near the present site of Benalla, simply recording the waterway as the ‘Swampy’ (Mitchell, 1838). In 1838 Grantville Stapylton, who was second in command of Mitchell’s expedition, named it the Broken River, probably because the course of the river was broken up into ponds (Neil McQualter, pers. com.). The Broken catchment developed with time into a premier grazing region, the gold rush largely bypassing the area save for relatively minor workings such as those on the Ryans Creek (Flett, 1979). Few historical accounts have been previously reported of native fish in the Broken catchment. John Langtry, in his post-World War Two survey of the inland fishery, mentioned the reputed abundance of Macquarie perch in the Broken River (Cadwallader, 1977). Many thousands of juvenile Macquarie perch were sourced from the Broken River for translocation elsewhere between 1935 and 1962 and, in 1962, about 100 small Macquarie perch were relocated from the Broken River to Boosey Creek (Cadwallader, 1981). 13.2 The Past Distribution of Fishes in the Broken River Catchment The Sustainable Rivers Audit (Davies et al., 2008) divided the Broken catchment into a lowland zone (downstream of Swanpool), a slopes zone (upstream to Barwite) and an upland zone beyond the latter location. Only a few headwater creeks exist in the montane zone. Slopes type habitat, identified by the presence of confined valleys with streams containing extensive coarse gravel and sand substrates, extends further downstream to the Yin Barun/Mollyullah area. The slopes zone is therefore treated as existing down to these locations in this discussion. Apart from the slopes/lowland zone boundary, the habitat zones discussed below match those in the Sustainable Rivers Audit. The native fish rarity scores developed by the expert scientific panel that were used in the audit defined two types of habitat namely a lowland zone and a second merged habitat consisting of the slopes and upland zones. Most of the information presented below is sourced from oral history (mainly OH 63, 110-113, and 115) and a few newspaper accounts. In addition, local historian Redge O’Connor sourced information from 97 year old Frank Cook during the last weeks of Cook’s life, in reference to the Benalla area fishery in the 1920s. Also included are anecdotes provided by the late Laddie Clifford, a professional fisherman from Barmah, to the author in the 1980s about the lower Broken Creek. Very few old photographs of catches of native fish in this catchment have been located though one is of significance. It is recommended that further historical research be undertaken in this catchment, particularly along the lower reaches of the Broken Creek. 13-4 True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin 13.2.1 The Montane Zone Only a few small streams penetrate into the montane zone of this catchment and there are no records of larger native fish being present. 13.2.2 The Upland Zone Oral accounts indicate that cod and Macquarie perch had been present in the upland zone of the Broken River at least as far upstream as the Stockyard Creek area. A first-hand account from Frank Moore, originating from the 1940s, recalled that small numbers of fish were being taken on each outing. Frank, while familiar with the two cod species, could not recall with certainty what type of cod was taken (Moore, OH 115; Frank Moore, pers. com.). By that time major declines in native fish populations had been reported further downstream and a similar situation probably applied to the upland zone. Old stories indicate that cod and perch had been common in the upper Broken River (O’Connor, OH 111; Redge O’Connor & Ambrose Doxey, pers. com.). The limited evidence suggests that cod and Macquarie perch had been at least fairly common in the upland Broken River. There is no clear evidence indicating what species of cod were present in this zone but as both Murray cod and Trout cod were reported further downstream it is likely that both species were present. Blackfish were also common in the upper Broken River (Frank Moore, pers. com.). 13.2.3 The Slopes Zone Cod were common in the upper reaches of the slopes zone above Barjarg where some fairly large fish were taken (Doxey, OH 110; Ambrose Doxey, pers. com.), were very common in the Broken River in the Nillahcootie area, near Lima (Argus, 15 January 1924) and common in some of the larger creeks, including the Hollands and Ryans Creeks (O’Connor, OH 111). Stories from a number of residents, including Frank Cook, recalled that cod were present in the lower reaches of both the ‘Back’ and ‘Little Back’ (Wild Dog) Creeks at Nillahcootie (O’Connor, OH 111; Redge O’Connor, pers. com.). Upstream of Benalla both cod species were taken and old anglers told Ambrose Doxy that ‘bluenose’ (Trout cod) had been common in the early years of the twentieth century (Ambrose Doxey, pers. com.). The available evidence suggests that both species of cod had been common in the Broken River and larger creeks of the slopes zone and were present in some small creeks. Macquarie perch were abundant in the Broken River in the Williams Bridge and Barjarg areas (Doxey, OH 110; Argus, 15 January 1924) and in the Hollands Creek near Tatong, the Ryans Creek near Mollyullah, the Back Creek (O’Connor, OH 111; Redge O’Connor, pers. com.) and were taken from the Broken River near the Mansfield-Whitfield Road Bridge during the early 1980s (Author’s pers. obs.). Blackfish were also very common to abundant in those streams (Doxey, OH 110; O’Connor, OH 111) and at times were considered a nuisance when fishing for perch (Redge O’Connor, pers. com.). They were abundant in the Lima area where, on one occasion, an angler reported taking in the vicinity of a hundred fish from the river (Argus, 15 January 1924). The oldest resident to provide information, Frank Cook, indicated that up to the 1920s Catfish had a presence at the bottom of the slopes zone in the Hollands Creek, upstream to Tatong, and further upstream in the lower reaches of Back Creek (O’Connor, OH 111; Redge O’Connor, pers. com.). A newspaper story supports Cook’s account recording ‘good sport’ being had with several fish species in the Broken River and creeks near Lima. This sport included Catfish, and noted their superiority as a table fish, suggesting that they were regularly captured (Argus, 15 January 1924). There are no historical records of Golden perch or Silver perch in the slopes zone though captures of Golden perch have occurred in recent years. These captures are likely to have come from hatchery released fish. Based on evidence of their presence in similar habitat in the adjacent Ovens True Tales of the Trout Cod: River Histories of the Murray-Darling Basin 13-5 catchment it is suspected that these two species had a minor presence in the lower reaches of the slopes zone of the Broken River. 13.2.4 The Lowland Zone Redge O’Connor’s recount of the memories of Frank Cook, as well as the stories from other anglers, indicates that that cod were common in some lowland creeks near Benalla including the Baddaginnie and lower Ryan Creeks (O’Connor, OH 111). In the early years cod were very common to abundant in the Broken River with fish up to 75 lb.
Recommended publications
  • Taking Control Spring 2020 Newsletter
    Spring 2020 Taking Control Support, information and resources for individuals and communities impacted by wild dogs Above: Wild dog exclusion fencing contructed with Bushfire Recovery Funding. Inset: Combined Bushfire Recovery Fund and DeFence fencing across eastern Victoria. Source: DELWP. Bushfire recovery aids wild dog control Significantly, more than half of the BRF fencing The Community Wild Dog Control comprises Wild Dog Exclusion Fencing (WDEF), bringing Coordinators and members of the the total amount of publicly-funded WDEF erected in both regions in 2019-20 to 516km. (Seventy-five km of Wild Dog Program have been WDEF was constructed under the DeFence Project, helping farmers replace fences which was funded by the Commonwealth Government’s lost in the 2019-20 bushfires, Communities Combating Pests and Weed Impacts strengthening wild dog control in During Drought Program (see page 4).) These stretches of WDEF (see image above) are helping the process. farmers protect livestock from the threat of wild dog predation which can increase after bushfire. The Community Wild Dog Coordinators (CWDCCs) and members of the Wild Dog Program (WDP) have helped Further assistance is being offered by the WDP which farmers access funding under the Victorian has secured funding under Work for Victoria to hire an Government’s Bushfire Recovery Fencing (BRF) program. additional four Wild Dog Controllers (WDCs) for the next few months. Almost every application has been processed, resulting in the construction of 584km of new fencing in Gippsland and 277km in the Hume. delwp.vic.gov.au Spring 2020 Above: CWDCCs, Lucy-Anne Cobby, Brian Dowley and Mick Freeman.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria
    Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria R.C. DeRose, I.P.Prosser, L.J. Wilkinson, A.O. Hughes and W.J. Young CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra Technical Report 11/03, March 2003 CSIRO LAND and WATER Regional Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Goulburn and Broken River Catchments, Victoria R.C. DeRose, I.P. Prosser, L.J. Wilkinson, A.O. Hughes and W.J. Young CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra Technical Report 11/03, March 2003 Copyright ©2003 CSIRO Land and Water To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO Land and Water. Important Disclaimer To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO Land and Water (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. ISSN 1446-6163 Table of Contents Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Talk Wild Trout Conference Proceedings 2015
    Talk Wild Trout 2015 Conference Proceedings 21 November 2015 Mansfield Performing Arts Centre, Mansfield Victoria Partners: Fisheries Victoria Editors: Taylor Hunt, John Douglas and Anthony Forster, Freshwater Fisheries Management, Fisheries Victoria Contact email: [email protected] Preferred way to cite this publication: ‘Hunt, T.L., Douglas, J, & Forster, A (eds) 2015, Talk Wild Trout 2015: Conference Proceedings, Fisheries Victoria, Department of Economic Development Jobs Transport and Resources, Queenscliff.’ Acknowledgements: The Victorian Trout Fisher Reference Group, Victorian Recreational Fishing Grants Working Group, VRFish, Mansfield and District Fly Fishers, Australian Trout Foundation, The Council of Victorian Fly Fishing Clubs, Mansfield Shire Council, Arthur Rylah Institute, University of Melbourne, FlyStream, Philip Weigall, Marc Ainsworth, Vicki Griffin, Jarod Lyon, Mark Turner, Amber Clarke, Andrew Briggs, Dallas D’Silva, Rob Loats, Travis Dowling, Kylie Hall, Ewan McLean, Neil Hyatt, Damien Bridgeman, Paul Petraitis, Hui King Ho, Stephen Lavelle, Corey Green, Duncan Hill and Emma Young. Project Leaders and chapter contributors: Jason Lieschke, Andrew Pickworth, John Mahoney, Justin O’Connor, Canran Liu, John Morrongiello, Diane Crowther, Phil Papas, Mark Turner, Amber Clarke, Brett Ingram, Fletcher Warren-Myers, Kylie Hall and Khageswor Giri.’ Authorised by the Victorian Government Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources (DEDJTR), 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000. November 2015
    [Show full text]
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals
    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goulburn Broken Water Quality Strategy 20 Years on Presenting Outcomes of Long Term Nutrient Management in a Large Victorian Catchment
    Water Quality & Catchment ISSN 2206-1991 Volume 2 No 3 2017 https://doi.org/10.21139/wej.2017.028 THE GOULBURN BROKEN WATER QUALITY STRATEGY 20 YEARS ON Presenting outcomes of long term nutrient management in a large Victorian catchment P Feehan, M Turner BACKGROUND Average annual rainfall varies across the Catchment, The Goulburn Broken Water Quality Strategy (WQS) from 1600 millimetres in the high country to 400 (GBREWQC, 1997) was originally developed in the millimetres in the north-west. The catchment’s two mid 1990s. Strategy implementation was expected to major river basins (Goulburn and Broken Rivers) cover occur over 20 years, finishing in 2016. Implementation two per cent of the Murray-Darling Basin, or about 10.5 has been under way since the mid 1990s. The 1996 per cent of Victoria. version of the WQS was reviewed in 2002 and 2008. Water inflows to the catchment are 3,559 gigalitres per The original Strategy focused on reducing the risk year, or about 11 per cent of the total annual inflows to and impacts of blue green algal blooms by reducing the Murray-Darling Basin. the inputs of nutrients, especially phosphorus, to waterways and water bodies. Approximately one third of the catchment is forested and half is used for dryland agriculture (grazing and Many of the actions in the WQS were incorporated in the cropping) with the balance largely used for irrigated Goulburn Broken CMA Regional River Health Strategy agriculture. There are relatively small urban areas 2005 – 2015 (now updated as the Goulburn Broken and pine plantations. Urban and peri-urban areas are Waterway Strategy 2014 – 2022) (GB CMA, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Strategy
    MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY Native Fish Strategy Mesoscale movements of small- and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY Native Fish Strategy Mesoscale movements of small- and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin M. Hutchison, A. Butcher, J. Kirkwood, D. Mayer, K. Chilcott and S. Backhouse Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Published by Murray-Darling Basin Commission Postal Address GPO Box 409, Canberra ACT 2601 Office location Level 4, 51 Allara Street, Canberra City Australian Capital Territory Telephone (02) 6279 0100 international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile (02) 6248 8053 international + 61 2 6248 8053 Email [email protected] Internet http://www.mdbc.gov.au For further information contact the Murray-Darling Basin Commission office on (02) 6279 0100 This report may be cited as: Hutchison, M, Butcher, A, Kirkwood, J, Mayer, D, Chikott, K and Backhouse, S. Mesoscale movements of small and medium-sized fish in the Murray-Darling Basin MDBC Publication No. 41/08 ISBN 978 1 921257 81 0 © Copyright Murray-Darling Basin Commission 2008 This work is copyright. Graphical and textual information in the work (with the exception of photographs and the MDBC logo) may be stored, retrieved and reproduced in whole or in part, provided the information is not sold or used for commercial benefit and is acknowledged. Such reproduction includes fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction for other purposes is prohibited without prior permission of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission or the individual photographers and artists with whom copyright applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Our Rivers
    6916 CMA A3 BROCHURE.qxd 5/4/05 9:23 AM Page 1 Your local Catchment Management Authority location and contact details Restoring our rivers Address: 64 Dennis St, Colac, Vic 3250 Tel: 03 5232 9100 Fax: 03 5232 2759 Web: www.ccma.vic.gov.au Email: [email protected] Rivers are the lifeblood of Victoria Address: 3/107 Nicholson St, Bairnsdale, Vic 3875 Tel: 03 5153 0462 Fax: 03 5153 0458 Web: www.egcma.com.au Email: [email protected] Address: 79 French St, Hamilton, Vic 3300 Victoria’s Approach to River Tel: 03 5571 2526 Management Fax: 03 5571 2935 Web: www.glenelg-hopkins.vic.gov.au Rivers make up only a small portion of the Victorian Email: [email protected] landscape and yet their overall significance for the economy, the ecology and the social fabric of Victoria Address: 55 Welsford St, Shepparton, Vic 3630 is immense. Tel: 03 5822 2288 In making decisions on river protection, management Fax: 03 5831 6254 Web: www.gbcma.vic.gov.au and restoration, communities need to balance the Email: [email protected] economic, social and environmental values associated with rivers. Address: DPI Complex, Cnr Koorlong Ave and However, it is helpful to have identified what a healthy Eleventh St, Mildura, Vic 3502 river is to assist communities with these decisions. Tel: 03 5051 4377 Fax: 03 5051 4379 The Department of Sustainability and Environment’s Web: www.malleecma.vic.gov.au River Health Branch and the Catchment Management Email: [email protected] Authorities’ River Health teams are working together as the key caretakers of Victoria’s rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gold Colonies of Australia Than Has Ever Before Been Brought Within So Moderate a Com­ Pass and Price
    This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world's books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Implementation Information for the National Recovery Plan for the Murray Cod (Maccullochella Peelii Peelii)
    Background and Implementation Information for the National Recovery Plan for the Murray Cod Maccullochella peelii peelii National Murray Cod Recovery Team Written and compiled by John Koehn and Pam Clunie, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria. Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, October 2010 © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74208-677-4 This is a Background and Implementation Information document associated with a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • North East (Hume) Regionflood Emergency Response Sub Plan – Flood Subplan-Plan, Version 1.3, May 2018 1
    North East (Hume) Region Emergency Response Plan North East (Hume) RegionFlood Emergency Response Sub Plan – Flood SubPlan-plan, Version 1.3, May 2018 1 Published by Victoria State Emergency Service Melbourne May 2018 This publication is intended to be consistent with the State Emergency Response Plan (SERP), published by Emergency Management Victoria (EMV) in 2016. Authorised by the Victoria State Emergency Service, 168 Sturt Street, Southbank, VIC, 3006. An electronic version of the plan can be obtained at: www.ses.vic.gov.au Version Control North East (Hume) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan Version 1.3, May 2018 Final Edit North East (Hume) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan, Version 1.3, May 2018 2 North East (Hume) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan Certification The North East (Hume) Region Emergency Response Plan – Flood Sub-plan deals with response to flood incidents within North East (Hume) area of responsibility. The following plan is intended to provide the framework for North East (Hume) Region to effectively and efficiently respond to future emergencies caused by floods, and will remain current until rescinded by authority of the Victoria State Emergency Service (VICSES) Chief Officer Operations. ___________________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Tim Wiebusch Chief Officer Operations This plan is produced by VICSES and has been adapted from the SERP – Flood Sub-plan. All information contained in this plan was current at time of publication. VICSES would like to acknowledge the significant contribution of key stakeholders to ensure the content contained within this plan is of a high quality to support response activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Landscape, People and Economy
    Chapter 3. Landscape, people and economy Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 3. Landscape, people and economy Victoria’s North and Murray Water Resource Plan applies to surface water resources in the Northern Victoria and Victorian Murray water resource plan areas, and groundwater resources in Goulburn-Murray water resource plan area. This chapter provides a brief description of the landscape, people and economic drivers in the water resource plan areas. Working rivers The rivers of this water resource plan area provide many environmental, economic, and social benefits for Victorian communities. Most of northern Victoria’s rivers have been modified from their natural state to varying degrees. These modifications have affected hydrologic regimes, physical form, riparian vegetation, water quality and instream ecology. Under the Basin Plan it is not intended that these rivers and streams be restored to a pre-development state, but that they are managed as ‘working rivers’ with agreed sustainable levels of modification and use and improved ecological values and functions. 3.1 Features of Victorian Murray water resource plan area The Victorian Murray water resource plan area covers a broad range of aquatic environments from the highlands in the far east, to the Mallee region in the far west of the state. There are several full river systems in the water resource plan area, including the Kiewa and Mitta Mitta rivers. Other rivers that begin in different water resource plan areas converge with the River Murray in the Victorian Murray water resource plan area. There are a significant number of wetlands in this area, these wetlands are managed by four catchment management authorities (CMAs): Goulburn Broken, Mallee CMAs, North Central and North East and their respective land managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2017 Vol 42 No 1
    Wouldn’t you like to be here? The Trident, Koopartoo Mesa. Photo: Brian Fox Riverbed, Larapinta Trail. Photo: David White Walk Safely—Walk with a Club The Official Publication of Bushwalking NSW Inc From the Volume 42, Issue 1, 2017 ISSN 0313 2684 editor’s desk. OK, THERE has been a bit of a change here. We are of course dependent on you our readers for articles, but the supply has dried up. We have not published any Editor: Roger Caffin issues this year so far. So I have raked together what I could for a final print [email protected] issue: this one. I guess it is ‘So long and thanks for all the fish’. Graphic Design & Assembly: The front cover needs some explanation. You may have noticed a ‘blue gnome’ Barry Hanlon somewhere on almost all front covers - my wife, she likes blue. Editor’s privilege. So this Proofreader: Roy Jamieson front cover is a portrait of the two of us having morning tea and coffee on a scarp on Mt Blanche, to say farewell. OK, but why is Sue laughing her head off? Well, I had set the camera up on a little Joby Bushwalking NSW Officers: tripod, pressed the shutter with a 10 second delay, and scuttled back to sit down. President: Alex Allchin Unfortunately, in my haste I had ‘kicked the bucket’, and sent the kettle which had been Executive Officer: Kirsten Mayer sitting on the stove next to me flying. That's it out front - now empty. The windscreen is [email protected] also off to the side.
    [Show full text]