Modern Biodegradable Plastics—Processing and Properties Part II
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
polymers Review A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds M. Sai Bhargava Reddy 1 , Deepalekshmi Ponnamma 2 , Rajan Choudhary 3,4,5 and Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni 2,* 1 Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad 500085, India; [email protected] 2 Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar; [email protected] 3 Rudolfs Cimdins Riga Biomaterials Innovations and Development Centre of RTU, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Institute of General Chemical Engineering, Riga Technical University, Pulka St 3, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia; [email protected] 4 Baltic Biomaterials Centre of Excellence, Headquarters at Riga Technical University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia 5 Center for Composite Materials, National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”, 119049 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material is able to colonize host cells sufficiently to meet up the requirements of regeneration and repair. This process is multi-stage and requires the development of various components to create the desired neo-tissue or organ. In several current TE strategies, biomaterials are essential compo- nents. While several polymers are established for their use as biomaterials, careful consideration of the cellular environment and interactions needed is required in selecting a polymer for a given Citation: Reddy, M.S.B.; Ponnamma, application. -
Biodegradation of Polymers
Indian Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 4, April 2005, pp 186-193 Biodegradation of polymers Premraj R1 and Mukesh Doble2* 1Centre for Biotechnology, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, India 2Departmemt of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai 600 036, India Received 9 January 2004; revised 14 May 2004; accepted 25 May 2004 Exhaustive studies on the degradation of plastics have been carried out in order to overcome the environmental problems associated with synthetic plastic waste. Recent work has included studies of the distribution of synthetic polymer-degrading microorganisms in the environment, the isolation of new microorganisms for biodegradation, the discovery of new degra- dation enzymes, and the cloning of genes for synthetic polymer-degrading enzymes. Under ambient conditions, polymers are known to undergo degradation, which results in the deterioration of polymer properties, characterized by change in its molecular weight and other physical properties. In this paper mainly the biodegradation of synthetic polymers such as polyethers, polyesters, polycaprolactones, polylactides, polylactic acid, polyurethane, PVA, nylon, polycarbonate, polyimide, polyacrylamide, polyamide, PTFE and ABS have been reviewed. Pseudomonas species degrade polyethers, polyesters, PVA, polyimides and PUR effectively. No microorganism has been found to degrade polyethylene without additives such as starch. None of the biodegradable techniques has become mature enough to become a technology yet. Keywords: biodegradation, polymer, biodegradable polymers IPC Code: Int. Cl.7 A01N63/04; C08C; C08F10/02, 12/08, 18/08, 114/26, 120/56; C08G18/00, 63/00, 64/00, 65/00, 69/00, 69/14, 73/10 Introduction Some types of plastics have been shown to be Approximately 140 million tonnes of synthetic biodegradable, and their degradation mechanisms polymers are produced worldwide every year. -
Thermoforming
APPLICATION GUIDE: Thermoforming TIME REQUIRED COST SKILL LEVEL By Brian Sabart, Stratasys Inc. and Jeff Gangel, Formech International, Ltd. OVERVIEW Vacuum Forming Materials: Thermoforming is a relatively simple manufacturing process that is inexpensive when compared to other - ABS plastic molding and forming methods. Although thermoforming is often associated with manufacturing - Polyvinylchloride (PVC) of packaging items such as blister packs and disposable coffee cup lids, the cost and time advantages - Polycarbonate (PC) are realized in a broad spectrum of products in an equally broad range of industries. When using a Fortus - Polyethylene (PE) 3D Production System with FDM technology to construct thermoforming tooling, the process becomes - Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) simpler, more efficient and increasingly cost-effective. - High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) - Polypropylene (PP) - Polystyrene (PS) PROCESS DESCRIPTION - Polyphenylene Oxide (PPO) Thermoforming is a collection of manufacturing methods that heat and form sheets of extruded plastic. - Polyphenylene Ether (PPE) Thermoforming processes include drape, vacuum and pressure forming. - Polymethyl-Methacrylate (PMMA) - Acrylic Drape forming relies on gravity to pull the sheet against the tool. Vacuum forming, as the name implies, - Closed Cell Foam Polyester (PBT, PET) draws the heated sheet against the tool with the assistance of a vacuum. Pressure forming combines - Polyester Copelymer (PETG) vacuum and pressure to simultaneously pull and push the plastic sheet to the contours of the tool. - Thermoplastic Olefin (TPO) - Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) This process guide documents the steps for vacuum forming since it is the most common thermoforming - Thermoplastic Rubber (TPR) method. However, many of the details presented may also be applied to drape and pressure forming. -
Polymer Biodegradation and Biodegradable Polymers – a Review
Polish J. of Environ. Stud. Vol. 19, No. 2 (2010), 255-266 Review Polymer Biodegradation and Biodegradable Polymers – a Review Katarzyna Leja*, Grażyna Lewandowicz Department of Biotechnology and Food Microbiology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 48, 60-627 Poznań, Poland Received: 3 June 2009 Accepted: 2 November 2009 Abstract Synthetic polymers are important in many branches of industry, for example in the packaging industry. However, they have an undesirable influence on the environment and cause problems with waste deposition and utilization. Thus, there is a tendency to substitute such polymers with polymers that undergo biodegrad- able processes. Increasing interest in applying polymers based on natural materials such as starch has been observed. This review describes biodegradation processes of xenobiotics such as aromatic compounds, plastics (PVA, polyesters, polyethylene, and nylon), and polymer blends (Starch/Polyethylene, Starch/Polyester, and Starch/PVA). Moreover, this review includes information about biodegradable polymers such as mixtures of synthetic polymers and substances that are easy digestible by microorganisms (chemically modified starch, starch-polymer composites, thermoplastic starch, and biodegradable packing materials), synthetic materials with groups susceptible to hydrolytic microbial attack (polycaprolactone), and biopolyesters (poly-β-hydrox- yalkanoates). Production of this kind of material and introducing it to the market is important for the natural environmental. It may result in decreasing the volume of waste dumps. Keywords: biodegradation, biodegradable polymers, xenobiotics Introduction pollution of groundwater and surface water. Synthetic poly- mers are recognized as major solid waste environmental Developments in science and technology, especially pollutants. Another problem is disposal of agricultural plas- over the last two decades, have increased the amount of tic wastes. -
Compostable Polymer Materials This Page Intentionally Left Blank Compostable Polymer Materials
Compostable Polymer Materials This page intentionally left blank Compostable Polymer Materials Ewa Rudnik Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands First edition 2008 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (ϩ44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (ϩ44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN: 978-0-08-045371-2 For information on all elsevier publications visit our website at www.books.elsevier.com Typeset by Charon Tec Ltd (A Macmillan Company), Chennai, India www.charontec.com Printed and bound in Hungary 08 09 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Preface vii -
Food Packaging Technology
FOOD PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY Edited by RICHARD COLES Consultant in Food Packaging, London DEREK MCDOWELL Head of Supply and Packaging Division Loughry College, Northern Ireland and MARK J. KIRWAN Consultant in Packaging Technology London Blackwell Publishing © 2003 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered Editorial Offices: trademarks, and are used only for identification 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ and explanation, without intent to infringe. Tel: +44 (0) 1865 776868 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK First published 2003 Tel: +44 (0) 1865 791100 Blackwell Munksgaard, 1 Rosenørns Allè, Library of Congress Cataloging in P.O. Box 227, DK-1502 Copenhagen V, Publication Data Denmark A catalog record for this title is available Tel: +45 77 33 33 33 from the Library of Congress Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton South, British Library Cataloguing in Victoria 3053, Australia Publication Data Tel: +61 (0)3 9347 0300 A catalogue record for this title is available Blackwell Publishing, 10 rue Casimir from the British Library Delavigne, 75006 Paris, France ISBN 1–84127–221–3 Tel: +33 1 53 10 33 10 Originated as Sheffield Academic Press Published in the USA and Canada (only) by Set in 10.5/12pt Times CRC Press LLC by Integra Software Services Pvt Ltd, 2000 Corporate Blvd., N.W. Pondicherry, India Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA Printed and bound in Great Britain, Orders from the USA and Canada (only) to using acid-free paper by CRC Press LLC MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall USA and Canada only: For further information on ISBN 0–8493–9788–X Blackwell Publishing, visit our website: The right of the Author to be identified as the www.blackwellpublishing.com Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. -
Packaging Technology
PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY KAZAKH NATIONAL AGRARIAN UNIVERSITY ALMATY, KAZAKHSTAN 19 - 30 OCT. 2015 by ROSNITA A. TALIB BSc (Food Sc & Tech), MSc. (Packaging Engineering) UPM PhD (Materials Engineering) Sheffield, UK. Department of Process and Food Engineering Faculty of Engineering 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor Universiti Putra Malaysia Email: [email protected] Course Outcomes Students are able to : 1. To describe the functions, basic packaging design elements and concepts 2. To analyse various types of packaging materials for use on appropriate food 3. To differentiate standard test methods for packaging quality control 4. Describe various types of packaging equipment in food industry References/Textbooks 1. Soroka, W. (2009) Fundamentals of Packaging Technology. Naperville. Instituue of Packaging Professionals. 2. Klimchuk, M.R. and Krasovec, S.A. (2006) Packaging Design Successful Product Branding from Concept to Shelf. Hoboken. John Wileys & Sons 3. Morris, S.A. (2010). Food Packaging Engineering. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing Professional. 4. Robertson, G.L. (2006). Food Packaging - Principles and Practice (2nd Edition). Boca Raton: CRC Press. 5. Kelsey, R.J. (2004). Handbook of Package Engineering (4th Edition). Boca Raton: CRC Press. Package vs Packaging - Simple examples of package: boxes on the grocer's shelf and wrapper on a candy bar. - The crate around a machine or a bulk container for chemicals. - Generically, package is any containment form. - Package (noun) is an object. A physical form that is intended to contain, protect/preserve; aid in safe, efficient transport and distribution; and finally act to inform and motivate a purchase decision on the part of a consumer. Package vs Packaging Packaging is Packaging also - Packaging is a verb, reflecting the ever-changing nature of the The development and production of medium. -
Optimizing Thermoforming of High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) Trays by Design of Experiments (DOE) Methodologies
Optimizing Thermoforming of High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) Trays by Design of Experiments (DOE) Methodologies Vishal M. Dhagat Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, UConn Storrs, CT 06269-4157 [email protected] Ravindra Thamma Manufacturing & Construction Management, CCSU 1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, CT 06050 [email protected] Abstract The process of heating and reshaping plastics sheet and film materials has been in use since the beginning of the plastics industry better known as thermoforming. Today this process is very ubiquitous for industrial products including signage, housings, and hot tubs. It also produces much of the packaging in use today including blister packs, cartons, and food storage containers. The process of thermoforming has many advantages over other methods for producing high quality plastic products, with some limitations, which can be resolved by implementing stringent quality control using scientific methods to improve process performance. Two areas of interest in today’s industry of great concerns are lean manufacturing operations and environment. Thermoforming of high impact polystyrene sheets using vacuum forming technique requires technical knowledge on material behavior, mold type, mold material, and process variables. Research on these various subjects is well documented but very limited research is done in process optimization of HIPS (High Impact Polystyrene). Design of Experiments (DOE) approaches like the face-centered cubic central composite design can be used to refine the process and to minimize rejects. In this paper, we present a case study on thermoforming of HIPS single use trays made on a semi automatic machine using three criteria solely based on the FCC Design method. The optimization of tray forming and wall thickness distribution is explored. -
Innovations in High Performance Polyaryletherketone Victrex Polymer Solutions – Product and Technology Overview
Innovations in High Performance Polyaryletherketone Victrex Polymer Solutions – Product and Technology Overview With over 30 years of focus and experience Victrex Polymer Solutions, a division of Victrex plc, is the world’s leading manufacturer of high performance polyaryletherketones, including VICTREX ® PEEK polymer. Demands for higher performing and more efficient products combined with an increasing rate of change driven by shorter product life cycles and product development timeframes requires companies to provide cost effective solutions to meet these challenges. Victrex provides a wide range of polyaryletherketone products, technical service and support to our customers and end users on a global basis to help them deliver innovative cost effective solutions to the market. Working together we identify material and technical solutions that meet the most difficult design challenges. Using our high performance materials can help to achieve weight reduction, enhanced energy efficiency, the ability to produce smaller yet more powerful and functional devices, an increase in application lifetime, enhanced performance, compliance with legislation and environmental regulations, and overall lower cost. aving the most diversified product range of all suppliers • VICTREX ® PEEK High Flow Polymers — Designed for Hof polyaryletherketone allows us to offer different injection molding thin-walled intricate parts; they can viscosities and a wide range of product modifications to be used unfilled or with the capability for high filler meet customer requirements. Victrex materials are used loadings, offering ease of processing, shorter cycle times, successfully in a wide range of applications. When compared and outstanding performance. The excellent weld line with other polymers such as LCPs, PPS, PEI, and polyimides strength compared to LCP and PPS enables use for PI and PAI, or polysulfones like PES, fluoropolymers PTFE, design of thin wall moldings and micro parts. -
Financial Costs of Plastics Marking" Was Launched by the Com- Mission of the European Communities (DG-XI) in February 1999
&RPPLVVLRQRIWKH(XURSHDQ&RPPXQLWLHV '*;, )LQDQFLDO&RVWVRI3ODVWLFV 0DUNLQJ )LQDO5HSRUW $XJXVW )LQDQFLDOÃ&RVWVÃRIÃ3ODVWLFVÃ/DEHOOLQJ i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Ã ii )LQDQFLDOÃ&RVWVÃRIÃ3ODVWLFVÃ/DEHOOLQJ 7DEOHRI$SSHQGLFHV 5HIHUHQFHV &RQWDFWV 5HYLHZRI&RVW6WXGLHV 4XHVWLRQQDLUH6XUYH\ 4XHVWLRQQDLUHIRUWKHFRVWDVVHVVPHQWRIGLIIHUHQWSODVWLFLGHQWLILFDWLRQ VFKHPHV %DFNJURXQG,QIRUPDWLRQRQ3ODVWLF&RQYHUWHUV 1DWLRQDO6WDWLVWLFVIRU(VWRQLD)UDQFH,WDO\6ORYDNLDDQGWKH8QLWHG .LQJGRP 8?PPV?ILQDOGRF )LQDQFLDOÃ&RVWVÃRIÃ3ODVWLFVÃ/DEHOOLQJ iii $FURQ\PV STANDARDISATION CEN European Committee for Standardization ISO International Organization for Standardization IUPAC International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry PLASTIC INDUSTRY AHPI Association of the Hungarian Plastics Industry APME Association of Plastics Manufacturers in Europe BPF British Plastics Federation CEPMC Council of European Producers of Materials for Con- struction CIPAD Council of International Plastics Associations Directors ERRA European Recovery -
Environmental Biodegradability of Recombinant Structural Protein
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Environmental biodegradability of recombinant structural protein Yuya Tachibana1,2*, Sunita Darbe3, Senri Hayashi1, Alina Kudasheva3, Haruna Misawa1, Yuka Shibata1 & Ken‑ichi Kasuya1,2* Next generation polymers needs to be produced from renewable sources and to be converted into inorganic compounds in the natural environment at the end of life. Recombinant structural protein is a promising alternative to conventional engineering plastics due to its good thermal and mechanical properties, its production from biomass, and its potential for biodegradability. Herein, we measured the thermal and mechanical properties of the recombinant structural protein BP1 and evaluated its biodegradability. Because the thermal degradation occurs above 250 °C and the glass transition temperature is 185 °C, BP1 can be molded into sheets by a manual hot press at 150 °C and 83 MPa. The fexural strength and modulus of BP1 were 115 ± 6 MPa and 7.38 ± 0.03 GPa. These properties are superior to those of commercially available biodegradable polymers. The biodegradability of BP1 was carefully evaluated. BP1 was shown to be efciently hydrolyzed by some isolated bacterial strains in a dispersed state. Furthermore, it was readily hydrolyzed from the solid state by three isolated proteases. The mineralization was evaluated by the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)‑ biodegradation testing with soil inocula. The BOD biodegradability of BP1 was 70.2 ± 6.0 after 33 days. Many commercially available polymers have some associated environmental problems1,2. Te increase in the production and subsequent disposal of synthetic polymers causes serious environmental pollution because these polymers do not degrade in the natural environment. -
Sustainable Plastic Packaging
® Thermoforming ® Quarterly A JOURNAL OF THE THERMOFORMING DIVISION OF THE SOCIETY OF PLASTIC ENGINEERS FIRST QUARTER 2013 I VOLUME 32 I NUMBER 1 MANAGE WHAT YOU MEASURE Revisiting Labor-Based Costing pages 8-11 INSIDE … Sustainability: Strengthening the Message pages 20-25 SPE Council Review pages 28-29 WWW.THERMOFORMINGDIVISION.COM Thermoforming FIRST QUARTER 2013 Thermoforming Quarterly® VOLUME 32 I NUMBER 1 Quarterly® A JOURNAL PUBLISHED EACH Contents MANAGE WHAT YOU MEASURE CALENDAR QUARTER BY THE THERMOFORMING DIVISION I Departments OF THE SOCIETY OF Chairman’s Corner R 2 PLASTICS ENGINEERS Thermoforming in the News R 4 Editor Front Cover Conor Carlin University News R 15 (617) 771-3321 Thermoforming & Sustainability R 20-25 [email protected] Sponsorships Laura Pichon (847) 829-8124 +LJKHUSULFHG *URZLQJ DQGRU'HSOHWHG 'HPDQGIRU )RVVLO)XHOV 3ODVWLFV :RUOGZLGH Fax (815) 678-4248 [email protected] 3ODVWLFV 6XVWDLQDELOLW\ (IIRUWV I Features Conference Coordinator &RQVXPHUDQG 5HJXODWRU\ 5HWDLOHU 3UHVVXUHV Lesley Kyle 3UHVVXUHV *+*V HPLVVLRQVHWF The Business of Thermoforming R 8-11 (914) 671-9524 Page 20 The Dangers of Direct Labor-Based Costing in Manufacturing [email protected] Thermoforming Division Industry Practice R 12-13 Executive Assistant Grant to Help Students See Manufacturing as Opportunity Gwen Mathis Cover Artwork courtesy of Dallager Photography (706) 235-9298 All Rights Reserved 2012 Fax (706) 295-4276 [email protected] Thermoforming Quarterly® is pub- lished four times annually as an infor- mational and educational bulletin to Page 12 the members of the Society of Plastics Engineers, Thermoforming Division, and the thermoforming industry. The name, “Thermoforming Quarterly®” and its logotype, are registered trademarks of the Thermoforming Division of the Society I In This Issue of Plastics Engineers, Inc.