DOCSLIB.ORG

Torture: Moral Absolutes and Ambiguities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Torture: Moral Absolutes and Ambiguities Studien zur Politischen Soziologie | 2 Clucas | Johnstone | Ward (Eds.) Torture: Moral Absolutes and Ambiguities Nomos BUT_Clucas_ua_4077-5.indd 1 20.11.2008 9:14:06 Uhr Schriftenreihe „Studien zur Politischen Soziologie“ herausgegeben von Prof. Dr. Andrew Arato, The New School for Social Research, New York Prof. Dr. Hauke Brunkhorst, Universität Flensburg Dr. Regina Kreide, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main Band 2 BUT_Clucas_ua_4077-5.indd 2 20.11.2008 9:14:06 Uhr Bev Clucas | Gerry Johnstone | Tony Ward (Eds.) Torture: Moral Absolutes and Ambiguities Nomos BUT_Clucas_ua_4077-5.indd 3 20.11.2008 9:14:06 Uhr Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://www.d-nb.de abrufbar. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://www.d-nb.de . ISBN 978-3-8329-4077-5 1. Auflage 2009 © Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden 2009. Printed in Germany. Alle Rechte, auch die des Nachdrucks von Auszügen, der fotomechanischen Wiedergabe und der Übersetzung, vorbehalten. Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illus trations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machine or similar means, and storage in data banks. Under § 54 of the German Copyright Law where copies are made for other than private use a fee is payable to »Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort«, Munich. BUT_Clucas_ua_4077-5.indd 4 20.11.2008 9:14:06 Uhr Acknowledgments We are very grateful to Daniel Metcalfe for his able assistance in editing the chap- ters for this volume, to the School of Law and Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Hull, for supporting the conference at which earlier versions of these papers were presented, and to all our colleagues and friends who helped to make the conference a success. Thanks also to Silke Baumann at Nomos for her patience in preparing the book for publication. Hull, England Bev Clucas December 2008 Gerry Johnstone Tony Ward V Contents Introduction 1 Tony Ward, Gerry Johnstone and Bev Clucas 1. ‘Jurists, Bad Christians’: Torture and the Rule of Law 10 Massimo la Torr 2. Justifying Defensive Torture 39 Uwe Steinhoff 3. The Ticking Bomb Scenario as a Moral Scandal 61 Francesco Belvisi 4. Torture and Democracy 73 Hauke Brunkhorst 5. Survey of the Crime of Torture in the Jurisprudence of the ICTY 83 Tsvetana Kamenova 6. English Law and Evidence Obtained by Torture: Vindication of Basic 96 Principle or Judicial Abnegation? Implications of A v. Secretary of State for the Home Department. Patrick Birkinshaw 7. Bush II’s Constitutional and Legal Theory: The Constitution of Emer- 116 gency between Law and Propaganda Agustín José Menéndez 8. Torture, between Law and Politics: A Retrospective View 139 Marina Lalatta Costerbosa 9. Nursing During National Socialism: Complicity in Terror, and Heroism 147 Alison J. O’Donnell, Susan Benedict, Jochen Kuhla and Linda Shields 10. Torture and the Paradox of State Violence 163 Penny Green and Tony Ward 11. 24 and Torture 176 Bev Clucas Contributors 203 VII Introduction Tony Ward, Gerry Johnstone and Bev Clucas In November 2007 a conference was held at the University of Hull to discuss the permissibility of torture. The very fact that such a conference should seem worth holding is symptomatic, as Massimo La Torre remarks in his chapter, of a signifi- cant shift in the terms of political and philosophical debate since 2001. The chapters that follow are based on papers presented at that conference. It should be said at once that none of the contributors to this book disputes that torture, in the great majority of instances in which it is actually practiced, is morally abhorrent. But some our contributors disagree passionately on questions such as the following: x Are there some circumstances, however rare, in which torture is morally permissible or even required? x If so, should the legal prohibition on torture be subject to defences which cover such exceptional circumstances? x Should government agencies prepare their officials to respond to such cir- cumstances? x What are the terms of acceptable public discourse about the circumstances in which torture is permissible? A. The ethics of exceptional cases The case which best illustrates these questions is, perhaps, one to which Uwe Stein- hoff refers in his chapter. On 27 September 2002, the 11-year-old son of a senior German bank executive was kidnapped and a million Euro ransom was demanded for his release. Three days later, a law student called Magnus Gaefgen was arrested after collecting the ransom. Under questioning he would not say where the boy was or whether he was alive. The day after the arrest, Wolfgang Daschner, the senior po- lice officer leading the investigation, authorized his officers, in writing, to extract information ‘by means of the infliction of pain, under medical supervision and sub- ject to prior warning.’1 Gaefgen was duly warned what was in store for him if he continued to withhold information. According to Gaefgen, he was told ‘that a spe- 1 F. Jessberger, ‘Bad Torture – Good Torture? What International Criminal Lawyers May Learn from the Recent Trial of Police Officers in Germany’ Journal of International Crimi- nal Justice 3 (2005): 1059-73, p. 1061; P. Finn, ‘Police Torture Threat Sparks Painful Debate in Germany’ Washington Post 8 March 2003. 1 cialist was being flown by helicopter to Frankfurt who “could inflict on me pain of a sort I had never before experienced”.’2 Whatever the exact words used, arrange- ments really were made for a helicopter to bring a police martial arts trainer3 who ‘knew the areas of the body that are particularly sensitive to pain and [could] pur- posefully attack those areas’,4 to Frankfurt. In the event, the threat was sufficient to induce Gaefgen to admit that the child was dead and reveal the whereabouts of the body. Gaefgen was convicted of abduction and murder and sentenced to life imprison- ment. The officer who threatened him was convicted of coercion (Nötingung) and Daschner of instructing a subordinate to commit a criminal offence (Verleitung eines Untergebenen zu einer Straftat). The Regional Court rejected the defences of self- defence or defence of another (Nothilfe) and justificatory emergency (rechtfertigen- der Notstand).5 To allow either defence on the facts of the case would infringe an absolute constitutional prohibition on violations of human dignity: Respect for human dignity is the basis of this state, which is based on the rule of law. The framers of the Constitution have deliberately put such notion at the outset of the Constitution. In contrast, the right to life and to physical inviolability is only laid down in Article 2 para- graph 2 of the Grundgesetz. The motivation behind that lies in the history of this state. Docu- ments relating to the origin of the German Federal Republic make it absolutely clear that the members of the Parliamentary Council had very much in mind the cruelties of the National So- cialist regime. They pursued the fundamental purpose of preventing anything similar from re- curring and clearly to bar any such temptation through the drafting of the Grundgesetz.The human being was not to be treated for the second time as somebody having information that the state would wring out of him, even if for the purpose of serving justice.6 One aspect of the ‘cruelties’ to which the Court refers is discussed by Alison O’Donnell and her colleagues in Chapter 9 – and the unimaginable pain inflicted, for example, on concentration camp inmates in the course of medical experiments would clearly constitute torture under the legal definition discussed by Tsvetana Kamenova in Chapter 5. But do these contingent historical circumstances afford a basis for a morally absolute prohibition of torture at all times and in all circum- stances? The court stopped short of that conclusion, acknowledging that there were ‘theoretical borderline cases’ which the facts of the case – where the police had not, in the court’s view, exhausted all options short of torture – did not require it to de- cide. Uwe Steinhoff argues in Chapter 2 that self defence or the defence of others 2 J. Hooper, ‘Germans Wrestle with Rights and Wrongs of Torture’, Guardian 27 February 2003. 3 Finn, ‘Police Torture Threat’, p. A19. 4 Regional Court (Landgericht) of Frankfurt am Main, ‘Decision of 20 December 2004. Daschner Wolfgang and E. Case’, excerpts translated as ‘Respect for Human Dignity in To- day’s Germany’ Journal of International Criminal Justice 4 (2006): 862-5. 5 Jessberger, ‘Bad Torture – Good Torture?’, p. 1064. 6 Regional Court Decision, p. 863 (paras. 23-4). 2 provides both a moral and a legal justification for torture in cases like Daschner’s, although for reasons that he has stated more fully elsewhere,7 he opposes any institu- tionalization of torture or training of torturers. Hauke Brunkhorst (Chapter 4), by contrast, insists that the legal, as distinct from the moral, prohibition on torture must remain ‘notstandfest’ – firm whatever the emergency. Though Daschner and his colleague were convicted, the court found there were ‘massive mitigating circumstances’ and imposed only nominal penalties (reprimands and suspended fines).8 Was this simply a merciful response to two people
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reviewer Acknowledgments
    Reviewer Acknowledgments Margunn Aanestad Sameh Al-Natour Bijan Azad University of Oslo American University of Sharjah American University of Beirut Oslo, Norway Sharjah, United Arab Emirates Beirut, Lebanon Ahmed Abbasi Shoshana Altschuller Hillol Bala University of Virginia, McIntire School of Commerce Iona College Indiana University Charlottesville, Virginia New Rochelle, New York Bloomington, Indiana Alan Abrahams Catherine Anderson Sule Balkan Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University University of Virginia Arizona State University Blacksburg, Virginia Falls Church, Virginia Tempe, Arizona Alessandro Acquisti Corey Angst Ravi Bapna Carnegie Mellon University University of Notre Dame University of Minnesota Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Notre Dame, Indiana Minneapolis, Minnesota Ashish Agarwal Animesh Animesh Karen Barad The University of Texas at Austin McGill University University of Santa Cruz Austin, Texas Montreal, Canada Santa Cruz, California Julia Adler-Milstein Chadi Aoun Eric Barrette University of Michigan University of Technology Sydney University of Minnesota Ann Arbor, Michigan Sydney, Australia Minneapolis, Minnesota Monica Adya Sinan Aral Anitesh Barua Marquette University New York University University of Texas at Austin Milwaukee, Wisconsin New York City, New York Austin, Texas Walid Afifi Ofer Arazy Richard Baskerville University of California-Santa Barbara University of Alberta Georgia State University Santa Barbara, California Edmonton, Canada Atlanta, Georgia Ritu Agarwal Priscilla Arling Genevieve Bassellier University of Maryland Butler University McGill University College Park, Maryland Indianapolis, Indiana Montreal, Canada Leila Agha Deborah Armstrong Patrick Bateman Boston University School of Management The Florida State University Youngstown State University Boston, Massachusetts, Tallahassee, Florida Youngstown, Ohio Brad Agle Terrence August Anne Beaudry Brigham Young University University of California, San Diego Concordia University Provo, Utah San Diego, California Montreal, Canada William Agresti Robert D.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Law Review
    Volume 181 Fall 2004 ARTICLES CAN A COMMANDER AUTHORIZE SEARCHES & SEIZURES IN PRIVATIZED HOUSING AREAS? Major Jeff A. Bovarnick A FOURTH AMENDMENT PRIVACY ANALYSIS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE’S DNA REPOSITORY FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN REMAINS: THE LAW OF FINGERPRINTS CAN SHOW US THE WAY Major Steven C. Henricks THE STUDY OF LAW AS A FOUNDATION OF LEADERSHIP AND COMMAND: THE HISTORY OF LAW INSTRUCTION AT THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY AT WEST POINT Colonel Patrick Finnegan SEVENTEENTH WALDEMAR A. SOLF LECTURE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW Professor Michael J. Glennon BOOK REVIEWS Department of Army Pamphlet 27-100-181 MILITARY LAW REVIEW Volume 181 Fall 2004 CONTENTS ARTICLES Can a Commander Authorize Searches & Seizures in Privatized Housing Areas? Major Jeff A. Bovarnick 1 A Fourth Amendment Privacy Analysis of the Department of Defense’s DNA Repository for the Identification of Human Remains: The Law of Fingerprints Can Show Us the Way Major Steven C. Henricks 69 The Study of Law as a Foundation of Leadership and Command: The History of Law Instruction at the United States Military Academy at West Point Colonel Patrick Finnegan 112 Seventeenth Waldemar A. Solf Lecture in International Law Professor Michael J. Glennon 138 BOOK REVIEWS The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism Reviewed by Dale Stephens & Rosalind Dixon 155 Justice at Dachau Reviewed by Major Warren L. Wells 164 i Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C. Pamphlet No. 27-100-181, Fall 2004 MILITARY LAW REVIEW—VOLUME 181 Since 1958, the Military Law Review has been published at The Judge Advocate General’s School, United States Army, Charlottesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • West Point Band Presents
    JULY 12, 2018 1 THE JULY 12, 2018 VOL. 75, NO. 27 ® UTY ONOR OUNTRY OINTER IEW D , H , C PSERVING THE U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY AND THE COMMUNITY V OF WEST POINT ® Summer training continues... Yearling cadets familiarize themselves with the M4 carbine and advanced optics ahead of weapons qualification with help from members of Task Force Falcon as part of U.S. Military Academy Cadet Field Training Monday at the training ranges. Visit all the USMA social media platforms and the USMA Flickr site for updated summer training photos. Photos by Matthew Moeller/ PAO 2 JULY 12, 2018 NEWS & FEATURES POINTER VIEW Finnegan, former department Head and Dean of the Academic Board, passes away Submitted by the Office of the Dean lieutenant in 1971, he attended the Kennedy Retired Brig. Gen. School of Government at Harvard University Patrick Finnegan Retired Brig. Gen. Patrick Finnegan, and earned a Master of Public Administration (second from right), Staff Judge Advocate, professor and head, degree in 1973. Staff Judge Advocate, Department of Law and 12th Dean of the Finnegan was selected for the Judge professor and head, Academic Board, passed away suddenly on Advocate General’s Funded Legal Education Department of Law July 2. He was 68 years old. Finnegan retired Program and received his Juris Doctor from and 12th Dean of the from the Army in 2010 after almost 40 years the University of Virginia Law School in 1979. Academic Board, Finnegan had an extraordinarily of distinguished service to assume the position passed away suddenly as the 25th president of Longwood University distinguished military career.
    [Show full text]
  • A Salute to the Irish Who Serve
    BLARNEY stone WINTER 2021 “THERE IS NOTHING NOBLER A Salute THAN RISKING YOUR LIFE FOR YOUR COUNTRY.“ to the Irish – NICK LAMPSON who Serve A PUBLICATION OF THE NOTRE DAME ADVANCEMENT OFFICE From the PRESIDENT To our NDHS families and friends – n this season of celebrating that first Christmas miracle, Our last days were spent remotely as each of our students I’m absolutely convinced we were blessed to experience designed and tackled their own versions of Community one of our own this past fall – when we were able to Outreach. And can there be a better year to think outside Ibegin school on campus in August, got to stay here one’s self? throughout, made it through exams and reached our target date of completion. In truth, our students are just emulating what the Notre Dame family has long demonstrated with great constancy and But to add some color to that landscape, we pretty much kindness. Thinking about others. limped across the finish line. One of our diocesan principals said it felt like we “were screeching into the break with two As we step into the unknown of 2021, we pray that all are able wheels on fire.” It may have actually been three. to overcome the impact of this pandemic – be it health, income or livelihood. We were not unscathed. We had positive cases, though not many, who had to isolate in turn requiring others to quarantine And we thank you for all you will do and have done to help us for an even longer period – all who became remote learners.
    [Show full text]
  • “W E Don't Have to Share Beliefs, Just a Planet.”
    4th International Conference on Conflict Resolution Education (CRE) Building Infrastructures for Change: Innovations in Conflict Resolution Education (CRE) June 8 – 13, 2011 Cleveland, Ohio, USA just a planet.” just June 8 - 9 Pre-Conference Trainings June 10 - 11 Main Conference – Keynotes and Workshops June 12 - 13 U.S. Community College Seminar: Developing Peace and Conflict Studies Programs http://creducation.org/cre/goto/4th Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C), Western Campus 11000 Pleasant Valley Rd, Parma, Ohio “We don’t have to share beliefs, beliefs, share to have “We don’t Credits offered: Graduate, Social Work, Counseling, RCH, CEU ® GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PREVENTION OF ARMED CONFLICT We don’t have to share beliefs – just a planet. Hosted by Global Issues Resource Center Cuyahoga Community College, Cleveland Ohio, USA The Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflice (GPPAC) is a global civil society GLOBAL led network which seeks to build an international consensus on peacebuilding and the PARTNERSHIP prevention of violent conflict. GPPAC is governed by an International Steering Group which FOR THE consists of representatives from all regions and a number of international NGOs. The Global PREVENTION Secretariat is held by the GPPAC Foundation in the Hague, the Netherlands. OF ARMED CONFLICT About GPPAC The Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC)is a member-led network of civil society organisations (CSOs) active in the field of conflict prevention and peacebuilding across the world. The network is organised around 15 regional networks of local organisations, each region having its own priorities, character and agenda. Each region is represented in an International Steering Group, which determines joint global priorities and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Reserve and National Guard Support to Intelligence
    Subscriptions: Free unit subscriptions are available by emailing the Editor at [email protected]. Include the complete mailing address (unit name, street address, and building number) and the number of copies per issue. Don’t forget to email the Editor when your unit moves, deploys, or redeploys to insure continual receipt of the Bulletin. Reprints: Material in this Bulletin in not copyrighted (except where indicated). Content may be reprinted if the MI Professional Bulletin and the authors are credited. Our mailing address: MIPB, USAICoE, Box 2001, Bldg. 51005, Ft. Huachuca, AZ, 85613 Issue photographs and graphics: Courtesy of the U.S. Army and issue authors. Commanding General Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence MG Scott D. Berrier publishes the Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin (MIPB) quarterly under the provisions of AR 25-30. MIPB Chief of Staff presents information designed to keep intelligence profes- COL Todd A. Berry sionals informed of current and emerging developments Chief Warrant Officer, MI Corps within the field and provides an open forum in which ideas; CW5 Matthew R. Martin concepts; tactics, techniques, and procedures; historical per- spectives; problems and solutions, etc., can be exchanged Command Sergeant Major, MI Corps and discussed for purposes of professional development. CSM Thomas J. Latter Disclaimer: Views expressed are those of the authors and STAFF: not those of the Department of Defense or its elements. The contents do not necessarily reflect official U.S. Army Editor positions and do not change or supersede information in any Sterilla A. Smith other U.S. Army publications.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION Honoring Brigadier General Patrick
    LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION honoring Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan upon the occasion of his retirement as Dean of the Academic Board at the United States Military Academy WHEREAS, It is the sense of this Legislative Body to acknowledge outstanding individuals whose professional lives, personal endeavors and community service are an example and inspiration to their colleagues, friends, and family; and WHEREAS, Members and former members of the Armed Services from the State of New York, who have served so valiantly and honorably in wars in which this country's freedom was at stake, as well as in the preserva- tion of peace in peace time, deserve a special salute from this Legisla- tive Body; and WHEREAS, Attendant to such concern, and in full accord with its long- standing traditions, this Legislative Body is justly proud to honor Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan upon the occasion of his retirement as Dean of the Academic Board at the United States Military Academy; this auspicious occasion will be celebrated at a Retirement Ceremony to be held in his honor on Tuesday, June 1, 2010, at Crest Hall, Eisenhower Hall, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York; and WHEREAS, Confirmed by the United States Senate as the 12th Dean of the Academic Board at the United States Military Academy on July 1, 2005, Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan was born in Fukuoka, Japan, on September 20th, 1949; he was appointed to the United States Military Academy in 1967 and, as a cadet, he was the Chairman of the Honor Committee and Head Manager of the Army Football Team; and WHEREAS, Upon graduation from West Point and being commissioned a second lieutenant in 1971, he attended the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and earned a Master of Public Administration degree in 1973; and WHEREAS, After completing graduate school, Brigadier General Finnegan was assigned as Battalion Adjutant, 3/39th Infantry, 9th Infantry Divi- sion, at Fort Lewis, Washington, from 1973-74 and then Headquarters Company Commander, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Our Junior Officers Prepared for Today's
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 111–80] BEYOND SERVICE CORE COMPETENCY: ARE OUR JUNIOR OFFICERS PREPARED FOR TODAY’S SECURITY ENVIRONMENT? HEARING BEFORE THE OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD JULY 15, 2009 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 53–209 WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE VIC SNYDER, Arkansas, Chairman JOHN SPRATT, South Carolina ROB WITTMAN, Virginia LORETTA SANCHEZ, California WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina SUSAN A. DAVIS, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JIM COOPER, Tennessee TRENT FRANKS, Arizona JOE SESTAK, Pennsylvania CATHY MCMORRIS RODGERS, Washington GLENN NYE, Virginia DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado CHELLIE PINGREE, Maine TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania ANNE MILES, Professional Staff Member THOMAS HAWLEY, Professional Staff Member TREY HOWARD, Staff Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2009 Page HEARING: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, Beyond Service Core Competency: Are Our Junior Officers Prepared for Today’s Security Environment? ...................................... 1 APPENDIX: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 ....................................................................................... 37 WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2009 BEYOND SERVICE CORE COMPETENCY: ARE OUR JUNIOR OFFICERS PREPARED FOR TODAY’S SECURITY ENVIRONMENT? STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Snyder, Hon. Vic, a Representative from Arkansas, Chairman, Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee ....................................................................... 1 Wittman, Hon. Rob, a Representative from Virginia, Ranking Member, Over- sight and Investigations Subcommittee ............................................................. 12 WITNESSES Beaudreault, Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Lawyer, Issue 1 2019
    U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps Issue 1 2019 31 Worldwide Wrap Up 42 SVC Program at 5 Years 64 Professionalization of Online Conduct 74 Acquisition in the Age of AI Lieutenant Colonel Carol Brewer, a special victim prosecutor, speaks during a class she led last fall at Fort Belvoir. (Credit: Chris Tyree) Table of Contents Editorial Board Issue 1 2019 Captain Meghan Mahaney Departments 38 Back to the Future Editor, The Army Lawyer Transforming the Rule Court is Assembled of Law to Compete Lieutenant Colonel Megan Wakefield By Major Todd M. Chard Strategic Initiatives Officer, OTJAG 2 The Future JAG Corps By Brigadier General R. Patrick Huston Major Samuel Gabremariam 40 Four Pillars of a Successful Strategic Initiatives Officer, OTJAG JAGC Career 4 News & Notes Remarks by Major General Kenneth D. Mr. Frederic L. Borch III Gray, U.S. Army Retired Regimental Historian Lore of the Corps Captain Nicole Ulrich 7 The German Job No.2 Editor, The Military Law Review Theft of Hesse Jewels Led to High Profile Courts-Martial 42 The Special Victim Counsel Major Jess B. Roberts, Director By Fred L. Borch Program at Five Years Professional Communications Program, TJAGLCS An Overview of Its Origins and Development Lieutenant Colonel Michael P. Harry In Memoriam By Colonel Louis P. Yob Vice Chair, ADA, TJAGLCS 10 Remembering Recently Lieutenant Colonel Edward C. Linneweber Departed Judge Advocates No.3 Chair, ADA, TJAGLCS By Fred L. Borch 48 Find Your Yoda Ten Rules for Being a Rock- Mr. Marco Marchegiani WRITECOM Art Director, GPO Star Operational Attorney By Brigadier General (Retired) Rich Gross 18 #thinkbeforeyoupost Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessler CV-588
    Daniel I. Sessler, M.D. February 24, 2019 RESUME Daniel I. Sessler, M.D. EDUCATION Undergraduate (Chemistry), University of California, Berkeley 1973-76 College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City 1976-80 Pediatric and Anesthesia residencies, UCLA 1980-85 CERTIFICATION American Board of Pediatrics 1985 American Board of Anesthesiology 1987 Voluntary recertification 2009 Association of Clinical Research Professionals 2004 CURRENT POSITIONS Chair, Department of OUTCOMES RESEARCH, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic 2005- Professor of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University 2008- Michael J. Cudahy Endowed Chair for Clinical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic 2011- International Scientist, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University 2011- FUNDED RESEARCH Total extra-mural funding $58,000,000 Current Departmental extra-mural funding per day $25,000 TEACHING Invited lectures and visiting professorships >350 Institutions Post-doctoral research scholars from ten countries >140 Research fellows Subsequently chaired anesthesia departments 6 Fellows Graduate students and medical students (for at least a full year) 26 Students Cleveland Clinic Medical School epidemiology & statistics course director (≈90 class hours per year) 2007-11 PUBLICATIONS Refereed full research papers and major reviews >750 Full papers Papers accompanied by an editorial >90 Papers cited >33,000 Times Book sections 1 Book and >30 chapters Editorials >25 SELECTED HONORS J. William Fulbright Scholar 1996-97 ÖGARI Anesthesia and Intensive Care Research Prize ($3,000) 1996 Schülke Prize ($9,000, shared with Andrea Kurz, M.D. and Rainer Lenhardt, M.D.) 1997 American Society of Anesthesiologists Excellence in Research Award ($4,000) 2002 Alpha Omega Alpha Distinguished Faculty 2003 Eponymous lectureships 19 Editorial boards (>650 individual reviews, excluding >550 papers handled for Anesthsiology) 7 Board of directors: Foundation for Anesthesia Education & Research (FAER) 2014- Curriculum Vitae Daniel I.
    [Show full text]
  • Neweta Certified Technicians
    ETA CERTIFIED TECHNICIANS The following is a list of professionals who have earned new certifications between June 1 and July 31, 2020 under one or more of ETA NEW International’s 80+ certification programs. Names of these highly qualified technicians have earned ETA’s formal endorsement and approval. CERT. # NAME ORGANIZATION PROCTOR LOCATION CERT. # NAME SCHOOL PROCTOR LOCATION AST238642 Carl Ray Bermudez CALPIA Alejandro Diaz Imperial CA 5G Technician (5GT) AST237352 Mikhail Brown ETA International Tracy Sparks Greencastle IN 5GT238930 Brian Berces ETA International Tracy Sparks Greencastle IN AST237441 Mark Buckau Upgrade ETA International Greencastle IN 5GT238671 Brian Dickey ETA International Eric L Ingram Tampa FL AST237507 Lidia Campos ETA International Tracy Sparks Greencastle IN 5GT237208 Timothy Dryden ETA International Tracy Sparks Greencastle IN AST237203 Gotson Constant Upgrade ETA International Greencastle IN 5GT237324 Joseluis Godinez Brandman University Debra J Cruickshank Manteca CA AST238768 Carlos Couret-Rios Upgrade ETA International Greencastle IN 5GT238672 Gerald Hoffler ETA International Eric L Ingram Tampa FL AST238670 Alberto DeLeon Upgrade ETA International Greencastle IN 5GT237560 Gregory Homolka ETA International Tracy Sparks Greencastle IN AST237426 Michael DiChiara Upgrade ETA International Greencastle IN 5GT238673 Adrian Hughes ETA International Eric L Ingram Tampa FL AST238701 Sara Dolen YTI Career Center Thomas W Ferrell York PA 5GT237476 Jimmy Mendoza ETA International Tracy Sparks Greencastle IN AST237209
    [Show full text]
  • Over There: Teaching International and Comparative Law at West Point
    OVER THERE: TEACHING INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW AT WEST POINT Robert J. Goldstein* I. INTRODUCTION ................................. ...... 261 II. TEACHING LAW AT WEST POINT: A BRIEF HISTORY .... ...... 264 III. RULE OF LAW AND THE MILITARY................. ....... 267 IV. INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE CORE COURSE.......... ....... 268 V. COMPARATIVE LAW..............................271 VI. THE PANEL, "TEACHING INTERNATIONAL LAW OUTSIDE LAW SCHOOLS".............................. ............. 273 I. INTRODUCTION The 2013 International Law Weekend panel discussion, "Teaching International Law Outside Law Schools," was considered by many present to be a novel reflection on the challenges of transplanting a law school-level course in international law to non-law students. At the United States Military Academy' (Academy), an undergraduate institution, the teaching of law, particularly international law, has been a staple of cadet education for almost 200 years. * Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Rule of Law, United States Military Academy. The views expressed in this Article are those of the Author alone, and do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Military Academy, the United States Army, or the government of the United States. The Author is also an adjunct law professor at Pace Law School in White Plains, New York, where he simultaneously teaches law students during the evening while teaching cadets during the day. The title of this article refers to GEORGE M. COHAN, OVER THERE (William Jerome Publ'g Corp. 1917). Cohan wrote Over There to recognize the consequences of the German declaration of war on the United States on April 6, 1917, spurring our involvement in World War I. Cohan purportedly lived near West Point in Central Valley, New York in a house that burned down in the 1960s.
    [Show full text]