Unternehmenskommunikation in Zeiten Der Wirtschaftskrise

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unternehmenskommunikation in Zeiten Der Wirtschaftskrise Simone Huck-Sandhu (Hrsg.) Unternehmenskommunikation in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise Kommunikation & Analysen Band 8 ISSN 1860-5257 Impressum Unternehmenskommunikation in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise (Kommunikation und Analysen, Band 8) Herausgeber Prof. Dr. Claudia Mast Universität Hohenheim Lehrstuhl für Kommunikationswissenschaft und Journalistik Fruwirthstrasse 49 70599 Stuttgart Druck Universität Hohenheim ISSN 1860-5257 © Prof. Dr. Claudia Mast, Universität Hohenheim, Fachgebiet Kommunikationswissenschaft und Journalistik, Stuttgart 2009 Inhalt 3 Inhalt Zu diesem Band ................................................................................................................. 5 Kommunikation in der Krise – Krise der Kommunikation? Eine Analyse der Wirtschaftskrise unter Gesichtspunkten der Krisenkommunikation von Monika Mahlbacher und Alina Schön .......................................................................... 7 1. Einleitung ................................................................................................................... 7 2. Die Wirtschaftskrise ................................................................................................... 8 3. Das Arenamodell und seine Bedeutung für die Wirtschaftskrise ............................. 13 4. Die Kommunikationskrise ........................................................................................ 19 5. Die Wirtschaftskrise als Kommunikationskrise: Anzeichen und Entwicklungslinien ............................................................................................ 27 6. Fazit .......................................................................................................................... 33 Glaubwürdigkeit als Leitgröße des Kommunikationsmanagements Ansatzpunkte für die Kommunikationsarbeit in Krisenzeiten von Verena Alter und Svenja Wilde .................................................................................. 39 1. Einleitung ................................................................................................................. 39 2. Klassische Studien zur Glaubwürdigkeit ................................................................. 40 3. Rolle der Glaubwürdigkeit in der Public Relations .................................................. 46 4. Glaubwürdigkeit als Leitgröße der PR in der Wirtschaftskrise ................................ 55 5. Aktionsplan für eine glaubwürdige Kommunikationsarbeit ................................... 60 Strategien zur Sicherung von Image und Reputation in der Wirtschaftskrise von Timo Gans und Lena Voith......................................................................................... 67 1. Einleitung ................................................................................................................. 67 2. Der Strategiebegriff .................................................................................................. 68 3. Image und Reputation .............................................................................................. 77 4. Strategien für den Umgang mit der Krise ................................................................ 82 5. Fazit .......................................................................................................................... 87 Die CEO-Kommunikation und ihre Bedeutung für die Glaubwürdigkeit eines Unternehmens Der Fall Deutsche Bank von Sophie Oestreich und Anna-Lisa Zug ......................................................................... 91 1. Einleitung: Die Finanzkrise und die Banken in Deutschland ................................... 91 2. Glaubwürdigkeit und CEO-Kommunikation – Eine theoretische Annäherung ....... 93 3. Der Fall Deutsche Bank ......................................................................................... 100 4. Und was bedeutet das für die Deutsche Bank? ...................................................... 112 Zur Rolle des Vertrauens für die Mitarbeiter- und Führungskommunikation Der Fall Siemens von Alexander Kießling und Anja Korb .......................................................................... 119 1. Einleitung ............................................................................................................... 119 2. Die Siemens-Affäre: Chronologie der Ereignisse .................................................. 120 3. Theoretische Grundlagen der internen Kommunikation ........................................ 123 4. Interne Kommunikation am Beispiel der Siemens AG .......................................... 134 5. Fazit und Ausblick ................................................................................................. 138 4 Inhalt Mitarbeiterorientierung in Zeiten fundamentaler Veränderungen Ansatzpunkte für das interne Kommunikationsmanagement von Karoline Kipping und Anke Nierstenhöfer ............................................................... 141 1. Einleitung ............................................................................................................... 141 2. Die Mitarbeiterorientierung als Aufgabe interner Kommunikation ....................... 143 3. Fazit und Ausblick .................................................................................................. 160 Die Kanzlerin als Krisenmanagerin Regierungskommunikation in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise von Kerstin Siegel und Arne Spieker ............................................................................... 165 1. Einleitung ............................................................................................................... 165 2. „Vertrauen“ in der Public Relations ....................................................................... 166 3. Regierungs-PR ........................................................................................................ 168 4. Wie Vertrauen entsteht ........................................................................................... 171 5. Zwischenfazit – Ist Vertrauen nun stimuli- oder rezipientenabhängig? ................. 175 6. Die Kommunikation der Bundesregierung in der Wirtschaftskrise........................ 177 7. Fazit ........................................................................................................................ 187 Eine Branche unter Druck Argumentationsstrukturen von Krisen-PR am Beispiel der Banken von Franziska Eberlein und Roxane Ülkümen ................................................................ 191 1. Einleitung ............................................................................................................... 191 2. Public Relations in der Finanzkrise ........................................................................ 192 3. Analyse der Kommunikation in der Finanzkrise .................................................... 198 4. Schlüsse für die Krisenkommunikation .................................................................. 214 5. Fazit ........................................................................................................................ 218 Im Aufwind oder Abstieg? Bestandsaufnahme der PR-Beratung von Maike Harm und Alissa Wedler ............................................................................... 221 1. Einleitung ............................................................................................................... 221 2. Definition und Abgrenzung der PR-Beratung ........................................................ 222 3. Aufriss über die Marktstrukturen der vorgestellten Beratungsbranchen ................ 228 4. Im Aufwind oder Abstieg? Auswirkungen der Krise ............................................. 229 5. Zusammenfassung und Ausblick ............................................................................ 239 Zu diesem Band 5 Zu diesem Band Das Vertrauen der Menschen in die Wirtschaft ist erschüttert. In Deutschland be- wegen sich die Vertrauenswerte bereits seit Jahren auf niedrigem Niveau, mit der Wirtschaftskrise sind sie aber noch weiter gefallen. Zu diesem Ergebnis kommt das Edelman Trust Barometer 2009, in dessen Rahmen Meinungsführer in 20 Ländern der Welt befragt wurden. In Deutschland hat lediglich rund ein Drittel der Befragten großes Vertrauen in die Wirtschaft. Zum Vergleich: In Europa sind es 42%, im globalen Vergleich gar 50%. Hierzulande geben drei Viertel der Be- fragten an, Unternehmen heute weniger zu vertrauen als noch im Jahr 2008. Be- sonders deutlich zeigt sich der Vertrauensverlust in die Bankenbranche – ein Er- gebnis, das vor dem Hintergrund der Finanzkrise kaum überrascht. Für Unternehmen sind solche Umfragewerte alarmierend. Denn unternehmeri- sches Handeln bedarf im Zeitalter aktiver Öffentlichkeiten der gesellschaftlichen Legitimation. Ein intaktes Vertrauensverhältnis zwischen Unternehmen und Öf- fentlichkeit bildet eine feste Basis für den Kauf von Produkten (durch Kunden), die Bereitstellung von Kapital (von Seiten der Investoren) oder die dauerhafte Zusammenarbeit (mit Mitarbeitern und Partnern). Eine solche Beziehung aufzu- bauen und zu pflegen ist u. a. Aufgabe der Unternehmenskommunikation. Ihr oberstes Ziel ist es, eine möglichst dauerhafte, vertrauensvolle Beziehung zwi- schen der Organisation auf der einen und der Öffentlichkeit (oder ihren Teilen) auf der anderen Seite herzustellen. Vertrauen und Glaubwürdigkeit sind zentrale Eckpfeiler für ein erfolgreiches Kommunikations- und Beziehungsmanagement. Es kann als zentrale Voraussetzung und zugleich Steuerungsinstanz für soziales Handeln verstanden
Recommended publications
  • Siemens Management Innovation at the Corporate Level Case Study Reference No 310-114-1
    Siemens Management Innovation at the Corporate Level Case study Reference no 310-114-1 This case was written by Dr Markus Menz and Professor Dr Guenter Mueller-Stewens, University of St Gallen, Switzerland. It is intended to be used as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. The case was written with the support of a Philip Law Scholarship awarded by ecch. The case was made possible by the co-operation of Siemens AG and from published sources. © 2010, University of St Gallen, Switzerland. No part of this publication may be copied, stored, transmitted, reproduced or distributed in any form or medium whatsoever without the permission of the copyright owner. Distributed by ecch, UK and USA North America Rest of the world www.ecch.com t +1 781 239 5884 t +44 (0)1234 750903 ecch the case for learning All rights reserved f +1 781 239 5885 f +44 (0)1234 751125 Printed in UK and USA e [email protected] e [email protected] 310-114-1 MARKUS MENZ GÜNTER MÜLLER-STEWENS SIEMENS: MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AT THE CORPORATE LEVEL INTRODUCTION At the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in February 1998, Siemens announced disappointing overall results for fiscal 1997. While the firm’s sales growth met shareholder expectations, net income remained largely stable. During the following weeks and months, Siemens’ top management not only faced increased pressure from its shareholders, but also higher environmental uncertainty and stronger global competition than during the early and mid-1990s. The challenge for the top management team was to optimize the business portfolio in a way that promised to add substantial shareholder value over the next years.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Estadual De Campinas Instituto De Economia Matheus De Oliveira Erhardt Brito Diversificação Como Estratégia De E
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS INSTITUTO DE ECONOMIA MATHEUS DE OLIVEIRA ERHARDT BRITO DIVERSIFICAÇÃO COMO ESTRATÉGIA DE EXPANSÃO DO GRUPO SIEMENS CAMPINAS 2014 MATHEUS DE OLIVEIRA ERHARDT BRITO DIVERSIFICAÇÃO COMO ESTRATÉGIA DE EXPANSÃO DO GRUPO SIEMENS Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado à Graduação do Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas para a obtenção do título de Bacharel em Ciências Econômicas, sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Lanna Franco da Silveira. CAMPINAS 2014 FOLHA DE APROVAÇÃO Monografia intitulada “DIVERSIFICAÇÃO COMO ESTRATÉGIA DE EXPANSÃO DO GRUPO SIEMENS”, área de concentração: Estratégias, custos, finanças e desempenho das empresas de autoria de MATHEUS DE OLIVEIRA ERHART BRITO, acadêmico do curso de Ciências Econômicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, aprovada pela banca examinadora constituída pelos professores abaixo especificados. ___________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Lanna Franco da Silveira - Orientador Universidade Estadual de Campinas ___________________________________________________ Profª. Drª. Maria Carolina Azevedo Ferreira de Souza Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas 2014 DEDICATÓRIA Ao meu falecido pai, Rubens Erhardt Brito, que nos deixou precocemente, mas que vive eternamente em nossos corações e à minha mãe Eliana de Oliveira Erhardt Brito, que está ao meu lado todo o tempo. AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço à minha mãe Eliana e ao meu pai Rubens, à minha avó Vicentina e ao meu tio Cleiton, que estiveram ao meu lado todas as fases da minha vida, por me apoiarem nas minhas decisões e por acreditarem em mim como pessoa. Não posso deixar de agradecer também ao meu irmão Miguel e à minha irmã Flávia, que me ensinaram aos poucos o irmão fraterno, assim como aos meu queridos sobrinhos Leonardo, Maria Paula, Beatriz e Felipe, que me proporcionam tantos momentos de felicidade.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Shareholders' Meeting of Siemens AG on January 26, 2006
    s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG on January 26, 2006 Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld President and Chief Executive Officer of Siemens AG Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG on January 26, 2006 Ladies and Gentlemen, It is a pleasure for me to report to you, our share- I met with political figures and heads of state holders, for the first time as President and Chief in key countries; Executive Officer of Siemens AG at our compa- I visited many countries, some a number of ny’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. And I’m times—including China, India, the U.S., happy to have this opportunity to personally Russia and the major European countries, lead you, so to speak, through our company’s to name just a few; past fiscal year and to explain our company’s I and I naturally also held comprehensive talks perspectives. with representatives of the media. Looking at the size of this audience though, “personally” probably falls short in this case. In each case, I not only saw and heard a high I’m deeply pleased and impressed that so many degree of interest in our company and its devel- of you have come here today. And above all, it’s opment, but also noted a feeling of great confi- a tremendous sign of how great your interest in dence and trust in Siemens, as well as accept- Siemens is. ance and respect for us as a partner. And of Many of you may know it: Today is not only course, that’s bound with the highest expecta- the date of our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting; tions of our strengths in meeting and mastering it’s also the birthday of our Supervisory Board challenges ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005 Key Figures
    s Annual Report 2005 Key figures in millions of euros 2005 (1) 2004 (1) New orders(2) 83,791 75,789 Sales(2) 75,445 70,237 Income from continuing operations 3,058 3,450 Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (810) (45) Net income 2,248 3,405 Net cash from operating and investing activities(2) (1,489) 3,015 therein: Net cash provided by operating activities 4,217 4,704 Net cash used in investing activities (5,706) (1,689) Supplemental contributions to pension trusts (included in net cash provided by (used in) operating activities) (1,496) (1,255) Net proceeds from the sale of Infineon shares (included in net cash provided by (used in) investing activities) – 1,794 Research and development expenses(2) 5,155 4,650 Shareholders’ equity (September 30) 27,117 26,855 Employees(2) (September 30, in thousands) 461 424 (1) Fiscal year from October 1 to September 30 (2) Continuing operations (excluding the discontinued mobile devices activities) Contents Letter to our Shareholders 6 Managing Board 12 Fit4More Performance and Portfolio 14 Operational Excellence 18 People Excellence 22 Corporate Responsibility 26 Group Presidents 30 Business Areas 32 Megatrends 48 Report of the Supervisory Board 64 Corporate Governance Report 72 Compensation Report 78 Information for shareholders* 88 Management’s discussion and analysis 90 Consolidated Financial Statements 136 Statement of the Managing Board 214 Independent auditors’ report 215 Supervisory Board 220 Managing Board 222 Siemens financial calendar 228 Corporate Structure** * With separate
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 Werner Von Siemens
    Global network of innovation The Company 2005 Siemens is committed to both continuity and change The Company 2005 Management continuity is a key factor in our success Werner von Siemens 1847 ± 1890 Wilhelm von Siemens, 1890 ± 1919 Carl von Siemens Carl Friedrich von Siemens 1919 ± 1941 Hermann von Siemens 5 ± 1956 Ernst von Siemens 1956 ± 1968 1968 ± 1971 Gerd Tacke 1971 ± 1981 Bernhard Plettner 1981 ± 1992 Karlheinz Kaske 1992 ± 2005 Heinrich v. Pierer since 2005 Klaus Kleinfeld The Company 2005 Siemens is one of the world©s most successful companies in electrical engineering and electronics The Company 2005 We are one of the largest companies in our field 119.0 in bns. of € Total sales in bns. of € Sales in electrical engineering and electronics 77.8 75.2 67.4 73.9 65.6 67.7 61.6 63.7 55.9 58.5 54.5 49.2 49.0 43.4 43.6 38.8 39.1 38.8 30.9 GE IBM Siemens Hitachi Hewlett- Matsu- Sony Samsung Toshiba Dell Packard shita Electronics The Company 2005 Our key figures reflect an outstanding performance Change 1) 1) in billions of euros 2004 2003 in % New orders 80.830 75.056 + 92) Sales 75.167 74.233 + 32) Net income 3.405 2.445 + 39 Net income provided by operating activities 5.080 5.712 ± 11 Net cash used in investing activities (1.818) (3.939) Research and development expenses 5.063 5.067 Shareholders© equity (September 30) 26.855 23.715 €1.10 Dividend €1.25 430 417 Employees (September 30, in thousands) 891 891 Number of shares (in millions) 1) Fiscal year: October 1 to September 30 The Company 2) Adjusted for currency effects and portfolio activities 2005 With production facilities all around the world, we are a true global player 96 72 61 44 14 4 North Germany Europe Asia- South Middle East, America (excl.
    [Show full text]
  • Shareholder Proposals
    Shareholder Proposals Shareholder Proposals for the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG on January 25, 2007 www.siemens.com Latest update: January 17, 2007 Below you find all shareholder proposals relating to items on the Agenda for the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on January 25, 2007, together with Management’s discussion thereon. This version of the Shareholder Proposals, prepared for the convenience of English- speaking readers, is a translation of the German original. For the purposes of inter- pretation the German text shall be authoritative and final. Hans-Walter Grünewälder, Wuppertal, has submitted the following shareholder proposals: With regard to Agenda Item 4, “To ratify the acts of the Managing Board” and Agenda Item 5 “To ratify the acts of the Supervisory Board”: Hans-Walter Grünewälder Brahmsstrasse 27 42289 Wuppertal 0202 62 17 57 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Corporate Finance Treasury Investor Relations (CF T 3) Wittelsbacherplatz 2 80333 Munich By telefax 089 636 32830 December 14, 2006 Counter-proposals to be voted on at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG on January 25, 2007 Ladies and gentlemen: At the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG to be held on January 25, 2007, I will present the following counter-proposals and request the shareholders present at the meeting to support my proposals: With regard to Agenda Item 4 “To ratify the acts of the Managing Board” and Agenda Item 5 “To ratify the acts of the Supervisory Board” Be it resolved that the acts of the two Boards are not ratified. Supporting statement: The Compensation Report of the Supervisory Board as published in the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year from October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006 reads as follows: “The remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board was determined at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting through shareholder approval of a proposal of the Managing and Supervisory Boards.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayer Annual Report 2012 Bayer Annual Report 2012 150 Years of Bayer
    A n n u A l R e p o R t 2012 » Science For A Better Life » Key Data » Chairman’s Letter » MagazinE: innovation through partnErship .............................. 16 » For a healthy life .............................................................................................. 18 » Food for all ....................................................................................................... 24 » Keeping out the cold ........................................................................................ 30 You can also download the Bayer Annual Report as an to our stockholdErs app from the appstore under “Bayer Annual Report.” » Executive Council ............................................................................................ 38 » Report of the Supervisory Board ..................................................................... 40 » Investor Information ........................................................................................ 46 » c oMbinEd Management Report of thE bayEr group and bayEr ag ......................................................54 » c onsolidatEd financial statements of thE bayEr group ....166 » Re sponsibility statement ....................................................................282 » a uditor’s Report .......................................................................................283 » f urthEr inforMation ..................................................................286 » The Bayer Group » At Home Throughout The World For direct access to a chapter, » Five-Year
    [Show full text]
  • Press Presse Press Presse
    Press Presse Press Presse Munich, Germany, December 2, 2009 Siemens Annual Shareholders’ Meeting to decide on a total of nine settlement agreements Siemens AG has come to an agreement about settlements with six further former Board members against whom damages were claimed in connection with past cases of corruption in the company. Corresponding agreements have been reached with former Managing Board members Johannes Feldmayer, Klaus Kleinfeld, Jürgen Radomski and Uriel Sharef, the former Chairman of the Managing Board and the Supervisory Board Heinrich von Pierer, and the former Chairman of the Supervisory Board Karl Hermann Baumann. Agreement had already been achieved prior to this with the three former Managing Board members Edward G. Krubasik, Rudi Lamprecht and Klaus Wucherer. No agreement has been reached with the former Managing Board members Thomas Ganswindt and Heinz-Joachim Neubürger, against whom criminal investigations by the Public Prosecutor’s Office Munich are pending. The current nine settlement agreements must be finally decided on by the Siemens Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on January 26, 2010. In September this year, the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG had already decided on the basis of the legal situation to take legal action against any former Board members with whom no settlement agreement was concluded in time for it to be presented at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in January 2010. An agreement with the former Managing Board member Günter Wilhelm, against whom Siemens AG is claiming damages for financing the independent employee association Ar- beitsgemeinschaft Unabhängiger Betriebsangehöriger (AUB), is not to be attempted until after ter- mination of the current investigations of the AUB matter by the Public Prosecutor’s Office.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    HOWMET AEROSPACE | 2020 ANNUAL REPORT HOWMET AEROSPACE | 2020 ANNUAL REPORT COVER IMAGE: Howmet is a global leader in advanced engineered solutions — such as these aero engine blades — providing differentiated technologies to enable lighter, more fuel-efficient aircraft and commercial vehicles to operate with a lower carbon footprint. 2020 ANNUAL REPORT THIS PAGE: Aero engine blade ring wwww.howmet.com Printed with permission of Honeywell International SHAREHOLDERSHAREHOLDER INFORMATION INFORMATION COMPANYCOMPANY NEWS NEWS DIRECTDIRECT DEPOSIT DEPOSIT OF DIVIDENDS OF DIVIDENDS Visit Visitwww.howmet.com www.howmet.com for Howmet for Howmet Aerospace’s Aerospace’s ShareholdersShareholders may mayhave have their their quarterly quarterly dividends dividends SecuritiesSecurities and Exchangeand Exchange Commission Commission filings, filings, quarterly quarterly depositeddeposited directly directly to their to their checking, checking, savings savings or money or money earningsearnings reports, reports, and otherand other Company Company news. news. marketmarket accounts accounts at any at financialany financial institution institution that that participatesparticipates in the in Automated the Automated Clearing Clearing House House system. system. CopiesCopies of the of Company’s the Company’s annual annual report, report, proxy proxy statement,statement, and Formsand Forms 10-K 10-Kand 10-Qand 10-Q may maybe requested be requested SHAREHOLDERSHAREHOLDER SERVICES SERVICES at noat cost no costby visiting by visiting www.howmet.com/investors,
    [Show full text]
  • EMERGING MARKETS: a Review of Business and Legal I Legal and Business of a MARKETS:Review EMERGING
    EMERGING MARKETS: EMERGING MARKETS: Review A of Business and Legal I Emerging Markets : A Review of Business and Legal Issues VOLUME 1 | No 1 | APRIL 2009 ssues ssues Articles: The Siemens Corruption Outburst and the CEOs Who Combat It: A Corporate Governance Case Study Wojciech Rogowski Capital Market Supervision in Poland Andrzej Michór Cybercrime Challenges in the Framework of Information-Oriented Society Kseniya Yurtayeva Judicially Legal Forms Of Copyrights Property Protection (Exceptional) According To The Legislation Of Ukraine And EU Burlakov Sergіy Yurievych Report on insurance frauds in Poland (2009) Tomasz Gulla VOLUME1 No| 1 APRIL | 2009 Student notes: Institution of The Crown Witness In Poland On The Basis Of The Crown Witness Act of June 25 1997 Marta Flis Poland as a part of the Eurozone. Current Problems and Discussions Agata Kochman EMERGING MARKETS: A Review of Business and Legal Issues The purpose of the journal is to provide forum Emerging Markets : for international, interdisciplinary work on the A Review of Business and business and legal issues confronting emerging markets. Legal Issues The journal combines theoretical soundness and practical relevance. The articles guide policy makers while also advancing theoretical understanding. Editorial Board Advisory Board Richard Warner Edward Carter Editor In Chief Assistant Illinois Attorney General Professor of Law Supervisor of the Financial Crimes Prosecution Unit Faculty Director, Center for Law and Computers Adjunct Professor of Law Chicago-Kent College of Law Chicago-Kent
    [Show full text]
  • As a Trusted Corporate Citizen We Drive Progress with Business Excellence
    s � ������������ � ���������������������������������� �������������������� ���������������������������������� ���������������������������������� ������������������������� ��������������������������������� ������������������������������������ ��������������������� ����������������������� 02 20 rt ty Repo sibili e Respon e at rpor Co s Corporate Responsibility Report 2002 �������������� ������������� �������������������������� ������������������������������ BUSINESS EXCELLENCE 4 Business excellence, 20 Business excellence 30 A motivated workforce is our most environmental stewardship and 22 “We strengthen our customers” important asset corporate citizenship 23 Innovating for tomorrow 32 Environmental stewardship 10 Foreword 25 Getting better all the time – 34 Eco-compatible and economical 13 Corporate policy and organization with top+ products, solutions and services 16 At a glance 26 Diversity – a wellspring of creativity 39 Environmental protection at 18 Milestones 27 Excellent employees guarantee our Siemens success 43 Our environmental goals � The future is inherent in everything we do. To master its challenges and sustain profitable growth, we believe in upholding our commitment to responsible leadership, environmental stewardship and corporate citizenship wherever in the world we do business. CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 44 Work safety and healthcare 56 Country profile: Russia provisions 62 Facts and figures 2002 46 Corporate citizenship 74 Glossary 48 Dialogue creates understanding 76 Ordering and contact information
    [Show full text]
  • Managermagazin 2/2006 Unternehmen Siemens
    Unternehmen Siemens 56 managermagazin 2/2006 Unternehmen Siemens Die KCK-Herrschaft SIEMENS Der neue Vorstandschef Klaus Kleinfeld steckt dem Konzern ein ambitioniertes Wachstumsziel. Aber hat er auch die richtige Strategie? anchmal sind es merkwürdige versorgen. Siemens-Ingenieure, lobt wärmekraftwerk, wie der Vorstandschef Themen, die Siemens-Chef Kleinfeld, haben den Wärmetauscher den Elektronikgiganten strategisch neu MKlaus Kleinfeld (48) ins entwickelt, der weltweit erstmals eine ausrichten will. BOSTELMANN/WIRTSCHAFTSWOCHE BERT FOTO: Schwärmen bringen. Ein Erdwärme- wirtschaftliche Stromerzeugung bei die- „Siemens ist ein Infrastruktur-Anbie- kraftwerk in Unterhaching nahe Mün- sen Wassertemperaturen ermöglicht. ter“, postuliert der anglophile Topmana- chen zum Beispiel. Ein typischer Fall von Selbstverliebt- ger, der in Englisch flüssiger formuliert 123 Grad Celsius heiß ist das Wasser, heit deutscher Ingenieure? Mitnichten. als in seiner Muttersprache. Knackig das dort in 3000 Metern Tiefe aus dem Genau hier soll die Zukunft des Welt- amerikanisch klingt es denn auch sehr porösen Kalkstein sprudelt. Nächstes konzerns Siemens liegen. Unterhaching viel pathetischer, wenn er sagt: „Wir tra- Jahr soll dieses Wasser, durch ein Bohr- dient Kleinfeld als Beweis für die Inno- gen dazu bei, die großen Probleme unse- loch nach oben gepumpt und in Elektri- vationskraft seines Unternehmens, als res Planeten zu lösen.“ zität verwandelt, 2000 Haushalte der Beleg für dessen Wachstumspotenzial. Mit dieser heroischen Offerte soll der Gemeinde mit Strom und Fernheizung Vor allem aber demonstriert das Erd- Umsatz des Konglomerats, das Pro- managermagazin 2/2006 57 Unternehmen Siemens Hohe Hürden Erst sechs Siemens-Bereiche erreichen die Margenziele Umsatzrendite in Prozent Bereiche Marge 2005 Minimalziel 2007 Zukunftschancen 12,8 Magnetresonanz-, Computertomografen, Röntgentechnik sind Medizintechnik 11 erstklassig; Hörgeräte mit extrem hohem Gewinn, Ultraschall verlustreich, beim Boomthema IT-Lösungen fehlen die Aufträge.
    [Show full text]