Localized Whirlpool Folliculitis in a Football Player Justin J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
WO 2014/134709 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/134709 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 31/05 (2006.01) A61P 31/02 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (21) International Application Number: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, PCT/CA20 14/000 174 DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 4 March 2014 (04.03.2014) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, (25) Filing Language: English OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (26) Publication Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (30) Priority Data: ZW. 13/790,91 1 8 March 2013 (08.03.2013) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicant: LABORATOIRE M2 [CA/CA]; 4005-A, rue kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, de la Garlock, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1L 1W9 (CA). GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, (72) Inventors: LEMIRE, Gaetan; 6505, rue de la fougere, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, Sherbrooke, Quebec JIN 3W3 (CA). -
Bacterial Infections Diseases Picture Cause Basic Lesion
page: 117 Chapter 6: alphabetical Bacterial infections diseases picture cause basic lesion search contents print last screen viewed back next Bacterial infections diseases Impetigo page: 118 6.1 Impetigo alphabetical Bullous impetigo Bullae with cloudy contents, often surrounded by an erythematous halo. These bullae rupture easily picture and are rapidly replaced by extensive crusty patches. Bullous impetigo is classically caused by Staphylococcus aureus. cause basic lesion Basic Lesions: Bullae; Crusts Causes: Infection search contents print last screen viewed back next Bacterial infections diseases Impetigo page: 119 alphabetical Non-bullous impetigo Erythematous patches covered by a yellowish crust. Lesions are most frequently around the mouth. picture Lesions around the nose are very characteristic and require prolonged treatment. ß-Haemolytic streptococcus is cause most frequently found in this type of impetigo. basic lesion Basic Lesions: Erythematous Macule; Crusts Causes: Infection search contents print last screen viewed back next Bacterial infections diseases Ecthyma page: 120 6.2 Ecthyma alphabetical Slow and gradually deepening ulceration surmounted by a thick crust. The usual site of ecthyma are the legs. After healing there is a permanent scar. The pathogen is picture often a streptococcus. Ecthyma is very common in tropical countries. cause basic lesion Basic Lesions: Crusts; Ulcers Causes: Infection search contents print last screen viewed back next Bacterial infections diseases Folliculitis page: 121 6.3 Folliculitis -
Pseudomonas Skin Infection Clinical Features, Epidemiology, and Management
Am J Clin Dermatol 2011; 12 (3): 157-169 THERAPY IN PRACTICE 1175-0561/11/0003-0157/$49.95/0 ª 2011 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved. Pseudomonas Skin Infection Clinical Features, Epidemiology, and Management Douglas C. Wu,1 Wilson W. Chan,2 Andrei I. Metelitsa,1 Loretta Fiorillo1 and Andrew N. Lin1 1 Division of Dermatology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Microbiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Contents Abstract........................................................................................................... 158 1. Introduction . 158 1.1 Microbiology . 158 1.2 Pathogenesis . 158 1.3 Epidemiology: The Rise of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ............................................................. 158 2. Cutaneous Manifestations of P. aeruginosa Infection. 159 2.1 Primary P. aeruginosa Infections of the Skin . 159 2.1.1 Green Nail Syndrome. 159 2.1.2 Interdigital Infections . 159 2.1.3 Folliculitis . 159 2.1.4 Infections of the Ear . 160 2.2 P. aeruginosa Bacteremia . 160 2.2.1 Subcutaneous Nodules as a Sign of P. aeruginosa Bacteremia . 161 2.2.2 Ecthyma Gangrenosum . 161 2.2.3 Severe Skin and Soft Tissue Infection (SSTI): Gangrenous Cellulitis and Necrotizing Fasciitis. 161 2.2.4 Burn Wounds . 162 2.2.5 AIDS................................................................................................. 162 2.3 Other Cutaneous Manifestations . 162 3. Antimicrobial Therapy: General Principles . 163 3.1 The Development of Antibacterial Resistance . 163 3.2 Anti-Pseudomonal Agents . 163 3.3 Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy . 164 4. Antimicrobial Therapy: Specific Syndromes . 164 4.1 Primary P. aeruginosa Infections of the Skin . 164 4.1.1 Green Nail Syndrome. 164 4.1.2 Interdigital Infections . 165 4.1.3 Folliculitis . -
Skin Disease and Disorders
Sports Dermatology Robert Kiningham, MD, FACSM Department of Family Medicine University of Michigan Health System Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest ◼ None Goals and Objectives ◼ Review skin infections common in athletes ◼ Establish a logical treatment approach to skin infections ◼ Discuss ways to decrease the risk of athlete’s acquiring and spreading skin infections ◼ Discuss disqualification and return-to-play criteria for athletes with skin infections ◼ Recognize and treat non-infectious skin conditions in athletes Skin Infections in Athletes ◼ Bacterial ◼ Herpetic ◼ Fungal Skin Infections in Athletes ◼ Very common – most common cause of practice-loss time in wrestlers ◼ Athletes are susceptible because: – Prone to skin breakdown (abrasions, cuts) – Warm, moist environment – Close contacts Cases 1 -3 ◼ 21 year old male football player with 4 day h/o left axillary pain and tenderness. Two days ago he noticed a tender “bump” that is getting bigger and more tender. ◼ 16 year old football player with 3 day h/o mildly tender lesions on chin. Started as a single lesion, but now has “spread”. Over the past day the lesions have developed a dark yellowish crust. ◼ 19 year old wrestler with a 3 day h/o lesions on right side of face. Noticed “tingling” 4 days ago, small fluid filled lesions then appeared that have now started to crust over. Skin Infections Bacterial Skin Infections ◼ Cellulitis ◼ Erysipelas ◼ Impetigo ◼ Furunculosis ◼ Folliculitis ◼ Paronychea Cellulitis Cellulitis ◼ Diffuse infection of connective tissue with severe inflammation of dermal and subcutaneous layers of the skin – Triad of erythema, edema, and warmth in the absence of underlying foci ◼ S. aureus or S. pyogenes Erysipelas Erysipelas ◼ Superficial infection of the dermis ◼ Distinguished from cellulitis by the intracutaneous edema that produces palpable margins of the skin. -
Necrotizing Fasciitis Report of 39 Pediatric Cases
STUDY Necrotizing Fasciitis Report of 39 Pediatric Cases Antonio Fustes-Morales, MD; Pedro Gutierrez-Castrellon, MD; Carola Duran-Mckinster, MD; Luz Orozco-Covarrubias, MD; Lourdes Tamayo-Sanchez, MD; Ramon Ruiz-Maldonado, MD Background: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a severe, Results: We examined 39 patients with NF (0.018% of life-threatening soft tissue infection. General features all hospitalized patients). Twenty-one patients (54%) were and risk factors for fatal outcome in children are not boys. Mean age was 4.4 years. Single lesions were seen in well known. 30 (77%) of patients, with 21(54%) in extremities. The most frequent preexisting condition was malnutrition in 14 pa- Objective: To characterize the features of NF in chil- tients (36%). The most frequent initiating factor was vari- dren and the risk factors for fatal outcome. cella in 13 patients (33%). Diagnosis of NF at admission was made in 11 patients (28%). Bacterial isolations in 24 Design: Retrospective, comparative, observational, and patients (62%) were polymicrobial in 17 (71%). Pseudo- longitudinal trial. monas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated bacte- ria; gram-negative isolates, the most frequently associated Setting: Dermatology department of a tertiary care pe- bacteria. Complications were present in 33 patients (85%), diatric hospital. mortality in 7 (18%), and sequelae in 29 (91%) of 32 sur- viving patients. The significant risk factor related to a fatal Patients: All patients with clinical and/or histopatho- outcome was immunosuppression. logical diagnosis of NF seen from January 1, 1971, through December 31, 2000. Conclusions: Necrotizing fasciitis in children is fre- quently misdiagnosed, and several features differ from those Main Outcome Variables: Incidence, age, sex, num- of NF in adults. -
Z:\My Documents\WPDOCS\IACUC
ZOONOTIC DISEASES OF LABORATORY, AGRICULTURAL, AND WILDLIFE ANIMALS July, 2007 Michael S. Rand, DVM, DACLAM University Animal Care University of Arizona PO Box 245092 Tucson, AZ 85724-5092 (520) 626-6705 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ahsc.arizona.edu/uac Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Amebiasis ............................................................................................................................................... 5 B Virus .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Balantidiasis ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Brucellosis ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Campylobacteriosis ................................................................................................................................ 7 Capnocytophagosis ............................................................................................................................ 8 Cat Scratch Disease ............................................................................................................................... 9 Chlamydiosis ..................................................................................................................................... -
Pediatric Cutaneous Bacterial Infections Dr
PEDIATRIC CUTANEOUS BACTERIAL INFECTIONS DR. PEARL C. KWONG MD PHD BOARD CERTIFIED PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGIST JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA DISCLOSURE • No relevant relationships PRETEST QUESTIONS • In Staph scalded skin syndrome: • A. The staph bacteria can be isolated from the nares , conjunctiva or the perianal area • B. The patients always have associated multiple system involvement including GI hepatic MSK renal and CNS • C. common in adults and adolescents • D. can also be caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa • E. None of the above PRETEST QUESTIONS • Scarlet fever • A. should be treated with penicillins • B. should be treated with sulfa drugs • C. can lead to toxic shock syndrome • D. can be associated with pharyngitis or circumoral pallor • E. Both A and D are correct PRETEST QUESTIONS • Strep can be treated with the following antibiotics • A. Penicillin • B. First generation cephalosporin • C. clindamycin • D. Septra • E. A B or C • F. A and D only PRETEST QUESTIONS • MRSA • A. is only acquired via hospital • B. can be acquired in the community • C. is more aggressive than OSSA • D. needs treatment with first generation cephalosporin • E. A and C • F. B and C CUTANEOUS BACTERIAL PATHOGENS • Staphylococcus aureus: OSSA and MRSA • Gp A Streptococcus GABHS • Pseudomonas aeruginosa CUTANEOUS BACTERIAL INFECTIONS • Folliculitis • Non bullous Impetigo/Bullous Impetigo • Furuncle/Carbuncle/Abscess • Cellulitis • Acute Paronychia • Dactylitis • Erysipelas • Impetiginization of dermatoses BACTERIAL INFECTION • Important to diagnose early • Almost always -
| Oa Tai Ei Rama Telut Literatur
|OA TAI EI US009750245B2RAMA TELUT LITERATUR (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 9 ,750 ,245 B2 Lemire et al. ( 45 ) Date of Patent : Sep . 5 , 2017 ( 54 ) TOPICAL USE OF AN ANTIMICROBIAL 2003 /0225003 A1 * 12 / 2003 Ninkov . .. .. 514 / 23 FORMULATION 2009 /0258098 A 10 /2009 Rolling et al. 2009 /0269394 Al 10 /2009 Baker, Jr . et al . 2010 / 0034907 A1 * 2 / 2010 Daigle et al. 424 / 736 (71 ) Applicant : Laboratoire M2, Sherbrooke (CA ) 2010 /0137451 A1 * 6 / 2010 DeMarco et al. .. .. .. 514 / 705 2010 /0272818 Al 10 /2010 Franklin et al . (72 ) Inventors : Gaetan Lemire , Sherbrooke (CA ) ; 2011 / 0206790 AL 8 / 2011 Weiss Ulysse Desranleau Dandurand , 2011 /0223114 AL 9 / 2011 Chakrabortty et al . Sherbrooke (CA ) ; Sylvain Quessy , 2013 /0034618 A1 * 2 / 2013 Swenholt . .. .. 424 /665 Ste - Anne -de - Sorel (CA ) ; Ann Letellier , Massueville (CA ) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ( 73 ) Assignee : LABORATOIRE M2, Sherbrooke, AU 2009235913 10 /2009 CA 2567333 12 / 2005 Quebec (CA ) EP 1178736 * 2 / 2004 A23K 1 / 16 WO WO0069277 11 /2000 ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO 2009132343 10 / 2009 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO 2010010320 1 / 2010 U . S . C . 154 ( b ) by 37 days . (21 ) Appl. No. : 13 /790 ,911 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Definition of “ Subject ,” Oxford Dictionary - American English , (22 ) Filed : Mar. 8 , 2013 Accessed Dec . 6 , 2013 , pp . 1 - 2 . * Inouye et al , “ Combined Effect of Heat , Essential Oils and Salt on (65 ) Prior Publication Data the Fungicidal Activity against Trichophyton mentagrophytes in US 2014 /0256826 A1 Sep . 11, 2014 Foot Bath ,” Jpn . -
Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Pseudo by Dysonrules
Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Pseudo by dysonrules Pseudoreplication: choose your data wisely¶ Many studies strive to collect more data through replication: by repeating their measurements with additional patients or samples, they can be more certain of their numbers and discover subtle relationships that aren’t obvious at first glance. We’ve seen the value of additional data for improving statistical power and detecting small differences. But what exactly counts as a replication? Let’s return to a medical example. I have two groups of 100 patients taking different medications, and I seek to establish which medication lowers blood pressure more. I have each group take the medication for a month to allow it to take effect, and then I follow each group for ten days, each day testing their blood pressure. I now have ten data points per patient and 1,000 data points per group. Brilliant! 1,000 data points is quite a lot, and I can fairly easily establish whether one group has lower blood pressure than the other. When I do calculations for statistical significance I find significant results very easily. But wait: we expect that taking a patient’s blood pressure ten times will yield ten very similar results. If one patient is genetically predisposed to low blood pressure, I have counted his genetics ten times. Had I collected data from 1,000 independent patients instead of repeatedly testing 100, I would be more confident that differences between groups came from the medicines and not from genetics and luck. I claimed a large sample size, giving me statistically significant results and high statistical power, but my claim is unjustified. -
Skin and Soft Ssue Infec On
Skin and so* +ssue infec+on N.Nuntachit MD. Non purulent SSTI • Impe+go, ecthyma • Celluli+s, Erysipelas • Erysipeloid • Necro+zing infec+on • Etc eg Glanders, bubonic plaque Purulent SSTI • Furuncle • Carbuncle • Abscess • Etc eg Tularemia SSTI severity • Purulent SSTI – Mild infec+on: I&D is indicated – Moderate: + systemic signs – Severe: failed I&D + ABT, systemic signs • Non purulent SSTI – Mild infec+on: no focus of purulence – Moderate: + systemic signs – Severe: failed oral ABTs, systemic signs, compromised, signs of deeper infecon Impe+go, Ecthyma • S.aureus or Beta hemoly+c streptococci • Difference – Depth – Scar • ABT should be ac+ve against both S. aureus and streptococci • Systemic therapy preferred – Pts with numerous lesions – Outbreaks Treatment An#bio#c Dosage Comment Dicloxacillin 250 mg po qid Cephalexin 250 mg po qid Erythromycin 250 mg po qid Some strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes may be resistant Clindamycin 300-400 mg po qid Amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg po bid Retapamulin ointment Apply lesions bid For paents with limited number of lesions Mupirocin ointment Apply lesions bid For paents with limited number of lesions Celluli+s, Erysipelas • Erysipelas • Cellulis – Upper dermis – Deeper dermis, – Delineated border subcutaneous fat – May be refer to celluli+s – No clear border of face • Areas of erythema, swelling, tenderness, and warmth, some+mes accompanied by lymphangi+s and inflammaon of the regional lymph nodes. The skin surface may resemble an orange peel (peau d’orange) Celluli+s, -
Dermatology in the ER
DRUG ERUPTIONS and OTHER DISORDERS Lloyd J. Cleaver D.O. , F.A.O.C.D, F.A.A.D. Professor of Dermatology ATSU-Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine INTERNAL MEDICINE BOARD REVIEW COURSE I Disclosures No Relevant Financial Relationships DRUG ERUPTIONS Drug Reactions 3 things you need to know 1. Type of drug reaction 2. Statistics What drugs are most likely to cause that type of reaction? 3. Timing How long after the drug was started did the reaction begin? Clinical Pearls Drug eruptions are extremely common Tend to be generalized/symmetric Maculopapular/morbilliform are most common Best Intervention: Stop the Drug! Do not dose reduce Completely remove the exposure How to spot the culprit? Drug started within days to a week prior to rash Can be difficult and take time Tip: can generally exclude all drugs started after onset of rash Drug eruptions can continue for 1-2 weeks after stopping culprit drug LITT’s drug eruption database Drug Eruptions Skin is one of the most common targets for drug reactions Antibiotics and anticonvulsants are most common 1-5% of patients 2% of all drug eruptions are “serious” TEN, DRESS More common in adult females and boys < 3 y/o Not all drugs cause eruptions at same rate: Aminopenicillins: 1.2-8% of exposures TMP-SMX: 2.8-3.7% NSAIDs: 1 in 200 Lamotrigine: 10% Drug Eruptions Three basic rules 1. Stop any unnecessary medications 2. Ask about non-prescription medications Eye drops, suppositories, implants, injections, patches, vitamin and health supplements, friend’s medications -
Ecthyma Gangrenosum: a Rare Cutaneous Manifestation Caused by Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia in a Leukemic Patient
Ann Dermatol Vol. 21, No. 4, 2009 CASE REPORT Ecthyma Gangrenosum: A Rare Cutaneous Manifestation Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a Leukemic Patient Young Min Son, M.D., So Young Na, M.D., Hye Young Lee, M.D., Jin Ok Baek, M.D., Jong Rok Lee, M.D., Joo Young Roh, M.D. Department of Dermatology, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) is a well-recognized cutaneous pressed and burn patients1,2. It usually occurs as a result of infection that most commonly affects immunocompromised bacteremia or, rarely, as a primary cutaneous lesion. The patients. It typically occurs on the extremities, or in gluteal lesions are present in the gluteal and perineal regions or and perineal regions. Although Pseudomonas aeruginosa is on the extremities, but they can occur anywhere on the the most well-known pathogen causing EG, other organisms body1,3,4. Most cases of ecthyma gangrenosum are asso- have been reported to cause EG. Herein we report a rare case ciated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia5,6. But of ecthyma gangrenosum presenting as aggressive necrotic numerous other organisms have been reported to cause skin lesions in perioral and infraorbital areas in a 47-year-old EG. patient with acute myelocytic leukemia after allogeneic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an aerobic gram-neg- bone marrow transplantation. It was caused by Stenotropho- ative bacillus that is a frequent colonizer of fluids used in monas maltophilia, which is an aerobic, gram-negative hospital settings. The incidence of S. maltophilia infection pathogen that has been associated only rarely with cuta- has been increasing.