DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 3.1 Birth Defects Descriptions for NBDPN Core, Recommended, and Extended Conditions Updated March 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 3.1 Birth Defects Descriptions for NBDPN Core, Recommended, and Extended Conditions Updated March 2021 Appendix 3.1 Birth Defects Descriptions for NBDPN Core, Recommended, and Extended Conditions Updated March 2021 Participating members of the Birth Defects Definitions Group: Lorenzo Botto (UT) John Carey (UT) Cynthia Cassell (CDC) Tiffany Colarusso (CDC) Janet Cragan (CDC) Marcia Feldkamp (UT) Jamie Frias (CDC) Angela Lin (MA) Cara Mai (CDC) Richard Olney (CDC) Carol Stanton (CO) Csaba Siffel (GA) Appendix 3.1 A3.1-1 Case Definition Table of Contents LIST OF BIRTH DEFECTS ................................................................................................................................. I DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF BIRTH DEFECTS ....................................................................................... 1 FORMAT FOR BIRTH DEFECT DESCRIPTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 1 CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................ 2 ANENCEPHALY ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 ENCEPHALOCELE ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 HOLOPROSENCEPHALY .................................................................................................................................................... 4 SPINA BIFIDA WITHOUT ANENCEPHALY............................................................................................................................... 5 EYE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 ANOPHTHALMIA/MICROPHTHALMIA ................................................................................................................................. 7 CONGENITAL CATARACT .................................................................................................................................................. 8 EAR ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 ANOTIA/MICROTIA ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 CARDIOVASCULAR ........................................................................................................................................ 11 AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS ............................................................................................................................................... 11 ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECT (ASD) ........................................................................................................................................ 12 ATRIOVENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT ................................................................................................................................ 13 (ATRIOVENTRICULAR CANAL DEFECT; ENDOCARDIAL CUSHION DEFECT) ................................................................................. 13 COARCTATION OF THE AORTA......................................................................................................................................... 15 COMMON TRUNCUS (TRUNCUS ARTERIOSUS OR TA) .......................................................................................................... 16 DOUBLE OUTLET RIGHT VENTRICLE (DORV) ..................................................................................................................... 17 EBSTEIN ANOMALY....................................................................................................................................................... 18 HYPOPLASTIC LEFT HEART SYNDROME (HLHS) .................................................................................................................. 19 INTERRUPTED AORTIC ARCH (IAA) .................................................................................................................................. 20 PULMONARY VALVE ATRESIA AND STENOSIS ..................................................................................................................... 21 SINGLE VENTRICLE ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 TETRALOGY OF FALLOT (TOF) ........................................................................................................................................ 24 TOTAL ANOMALOUS PULMONARY VENOUS CONNECTION (TAPVC) ...................................................................................... 26 TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT ARTERIES (TGA) ............................................................................................................... 27 TRICUSPID VALVE ATRESIA AND STENOSIS ......................................................................................................................... 29 VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT (VSD) ............................................................................................................................... 30 OROFACIAL ..................................................................................................................................................... 31 CHOANAL ATRESIA ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 CLEFT LIP ALONE (WITHOUT CLEFT PALATE) ...................................................................................................................... 32 CLEFT LIP WITH CLEFT PALATE ........................................................................................................................................ 33 CLEFT PALATE ALONE (WITHOUT CLEFT LIP) ...................................................................................................................... 34 GASTROINTESTINAL ................................................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. BILIARY ATRESIA .......................................................................................................................................................... 35 ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA/TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA ....................................................................................................... 36 RECTAL AND LARGE INTESTINAL ATRESIA/STENOSIS ............................................................................................................ 37 SMALL INTESTINAL ATRESIA/STENOSIS ............................................................................................................................. 38 i Appendix 3.1 Case Definition GENITOURINARY ........................................................................................................................................... 39 BLADDER EXSTROPHY ................................................................................................................................................... 39 CLOACAL EXSTROPHY .................................................................................................................................................... 41 CONGENITAL POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVES ..................................................................................................................... 42 HYPOSPADIAS ............................................................................................................................................................. 43 RENAL AGENESIS/HYPOPLASIA ....................................................................................................................................... 45 MUSCULOSKELETAL .................................................................................................................................... 47 CLUBFOOT .................................................................................................................................................................. 47 CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS ...................................................................................................................................................... 48 DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA .............................................................................................................................................. 49 GASTROSCHISIS ........................................................................................................................................................... 50 LIMB DEFICIENCIES (REDUCTION DEFECTS) ....................................................................................................................... 52 OMPHALOCELE ............................................................................................................................................................ 55 CHROMOSOMAL ............................................................................................................................................ 57 DELETION 22Q11.2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 57 TRISOMY 13 ..............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ultrasound Evaluation of the Central Nervous System
    Ultrasound Evaluation of the Ultrasound Evaluation of the Central Nervous System Central Nervous System ••CNSCNS malformations are the second most Mani Montazemi, RDMS frequent category of congenital anomaly, Director of Ultrasound Education & Quality Assurancee after congenital heart disease Baylor College of Medicine Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine ••PoorPoor timing of the examination, rather than Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Texas Children’s Hospital, Pavilion for Women poor sensitivity, can be an important factor Houston Texas & in failing to detect a CNS abnormality Clinical Instructor Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Radiology Department Fetal Head Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Fetal Head Central Nervous System Brain Development 9 -13 weeks Rhombencephalon 5th Menstrual Week •Gives rise to hindbrain •4th ventricle Arises from the posterior surface of the embryonic ectoderm Mesencephalon •Gives rise to midbrain A small groove is found along •Aqueduct the midline of the embryo and the edges of this groove fold over to form a neuro tube that Prosencephalon gives rise to the fetal spinal •Gives rise to forebrain rd cord and brain •Lateral & 3 ventricles Fetal Head Fetal Head Ventricular view Neural Tube Defects ••LateralLateral ventricles ••ChoroidChoroid plexus Group of malformations: Thalamic view • Anencephaly ••MidlineMidline falx •Anencephaly ••CavumCavum septiseptipellucidi pellucidi ••CephalocelesCephaloceles ••ThalamiThalami ••SpinaSpina bifida Cerebellar view ••CerebellumCerebellum ••CisternaCisterna magna Fetal
    [Show full text]
  • FROGLOG Newsletter of the Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force
    Salamandra salamandra by Franco Andreone ISSN 1026-0269 FROGLOG Newsletter of the Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force August 2004, Number 64. Meteyer et al. (2000) and Ouellet very low number of abnormalities. We (2000). only found one L. kuhlii, which may We examined a total of 4,331 have strayed from a nearby stream. frogs of 23 species and found 20 A third of abnormalities were types of deformities in 9 species of due to trauma; these included digit frogs. We divided deformities into two amputations (16% of all general types: developmental abnormalities), limb amputations (2%), abnormalities and trauma (injuries). fractured limbs (7%) and skin wounds Morphological Abnormalities in We distinguished trauma (4%). The most common Frogs of West Java, Indonesia abnormalities based on the developmental abnormalities were appearance of old scars or, if they digital (43%) and, of these, By Mirza D. Kusrini, Ross A. Alford, involved digits, the occurrence of brachydactyly (16.3%), syndactyly Anisa Fitri, Dede M. Nasir, Sumantri digital re-growth. Developmental (14.6%) and ectrodactyly (11.4%) Rahardyansah abnormalities occurred in limbs were the three most common. In recent decades, amphibian (amelia, micromelia, brachymelia, The oldest specimen of F. deformities have generated public hemimelia, ectromelia, taumelia, cuta- limnocharis stored in the MZB that interest as high incidences have been neous fusions), digits (ectrodactyly, exhibited abnormalities was a juvenile found in several locations, notably in brachydactyly, syndactyly, polydactyly, frog captured on 16 November 1921 North America (Helgen et al., 1998; clinodactyly), the back-bone (scoli- from Bogor without one leg (amelia) Ouellet, 2000). The only report on the osis), the eyes (anophthalmy) and the (ID057.10).
    [Show full text]
  • A Anencephaly
    Glossary of Birth Anomaly Terms: A Anencephaly: A deadly birth anomaly where most of the brain and skull did not form. Anomaly: Any part of the body or chromosomes that has an unusual or irregular structure. Aortic valve stenosis: The aortic valve controls the flow of blood from the left ventricle of the heart to the aorta, which takes the blood to the rest of the body. If there is stenosis of this valve, the valve has space for blood to flow through, but it is too narrow. Atresia: Lack of an opening where there should be one. Atrial septal defect: An opening in the wall (septum) that separates the left and right top chambers (atria) of the heart. A hole can vary in size and may close on its own or may require surgery. Atrioventricular septal defect (endocardial cushion defect): A defect in both the lower portion of the atrial septum and the upper portion of the ventricular septum. Together, these defects make a large opening (canal) in the middle part of the heart. Aniridia (an-i-rid-e-a): An eye anomaly where the colored part of the eye (called the iris) is partly or totally missing. It usually affects both eyes. Other parts of the eye can also be formed incorrectly. The effects on children’s ability to see can range from mild problems to blindness. To learn more about aniridia, go to the U.S. National Library of Medicine website. Anophthalmia/microphthalmia (an-oph-thal-mia/mi-croph-thal-mia): Birth anomalies of the eyes. In anophthalmia, a baby is born without one or both eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Diagnosis of Oromandibular Limb Hypogenesis Syndromes Ole Junga,B, Ralf Smeetsb, Henning Hankenb, Reinhard E
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016 Jun; 160(2):310-315. A patient with Charlie M Syndrome: Differential diagnosis of Oromandibular Limb Hypogenesis Syndromes Ole Junga,b, Ralf Smeetsb, Henning Hankenb, Reinhard E. Friedrichb, Max Heilandb, Amir Tagnihaa, Brian Labowa Aim. In order to provide adequate treatment to a patient with a subtype of Oromandibular Limb Hypogenesis Syndromes (OLHS), this study aimed to review and to analyze the current literature and treatment options of OLHS. Methods. Literature review in PubMed and Sciencedirect. Due to the small number of results, all available references were analyzed precisely. Results. Cases of OLHS are formerly rare and often incomplete. There are various classifications available, which, however, often seem confusing and are of little practical relevance. Furthermore, we present a complete case report of a patient with Charlie M syndrome, a type IV (Chicarilli)/ V (Hall) OLHS malformation. We also describe embryologic pathogenesis and differential diagnoses. Conclusion. As a result of our literature review, we recommend an adjusted classification for OLHS. Key words: Oromandibular Limb Hypogenesis Syndromes (OLHS), Charlie M Syndrome, Oromandibular and limb hypogenesis malformations (OLHM) Received: August 1, 2015; Accepted with revision: April 8, 2016; Available online: April 27, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2016.020 aDepartment of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children´s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA bDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Corresponding author: Ole Jung, e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION CASE REPORT Oromandibular Limb Hypogenesis Syndromes A twenty-three-year-old male with severe oroman- (OLHS) describe a group of heterogeneous malforma- dibular and limb deformities presented for mandibular tions of the face and body.
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing the Limits of Prenatal Ultrasound: a Case of Dorsal Dermal Sinus Associated with an Overt Arnold–Chiari Malformation and a 3Q Duplication
    reproductive medicine Case Report Pushing the Limits of Prenatal Ultrasound: A Case of Dorsal Dermal Sinus Associated with an Overt Arnold–Chiari Malformation and a 3q Duplication Olivier Leroij 1, Lennart Van der Veeken 2,*, Bettina Blaumeiser 3 and Katrien Janssens 3 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium 3 Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital and University of Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; [email protected] (B.B.); [email protected] (K.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: We present a case of a fetus with cranial abnormalities typical of open spina bifida but with an intact spine shown on both ultrasound and fetal MRI. Expert ultrasound examination revealed a very small tract between the spine and the skin, and a postmortem examination confirmed the diagnosis of a dorsal dermal sinus. Genetic analysis found a mosaic 3q23q27 duplication in the form of a marker chromosome. This case emphasizes that meticulous prenatal ultrasound examination has the potential to diagnose even closed subtypes of neural tube defects. Furthermore, with cerebral anomalies suggesting a spina bifida, other imaging techniques together with genetic tests and measurement of alpha-fetoprotein in the amniotic fluid should be performed. Citation: Leroij, O.; Van der Veeken, Keywords: dorsal dermal sinus; Arnold–Chiari anomaly; 3q23q27 duplication; mosaic; marker chro- L.; Blaumeiser, B.; Janssens, K. mosome Pushing the Limits of Prenatal Ultrasound: A Case of Dorsal Dermal Sinus Associated with an Overt Arnold–Chiari Malformation and a 3q 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES of the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM Christopher Verity, Helen Firth, Charles Ffrench-Constant *I3
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.74.suppl_1.i3 on 1 March 2003. Downloaded from CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM Christopher Verity, Helen Firth, Charles ffrench-Constant *i3 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74(Suppl I):i3–i8 dvances in genetics and molecular biology have led to a better understanding of the control of central nervous system (CNS) development. It is possible to classify CNS abnormalities Aaccording to the developmental stages at which they occur, as is shown below. The careful assessment of patients with these abnormalities is important in order to provide an accurate prog- nosis and genetic counselling. c NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CNS Before we review the various abnormalities that can affect the CNS, a brief overview of the normal development of the CNS is appropriate. c Induction—After development of the three cell layers of the early embryo (ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm), the underlying mesoderm (the “inducer”) sends signals to a region of the ecto- derm (the “induced tissue”), instructing it to develop into neural tissue. c Neural tube formation—The neural ectoderm folds to form a tube, which runs for most of the length of the embryo. c Regionalisation and specification—Specification of different regions and individual cells within the neural tube occurs in both the rostral/caudal and dorsal/ventral axis. The three basic regions of copyright. the CNS (forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain) develop at the rostral end of the tube, with the spinal cord more caudally. Within the developing spinal cord specification of the different popu- lations of neural precursors (neural crest, sensory neurones, interneurones, glial cells, and motor neurones) is observed in progressively more ventral locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance for Anencephaly and Spina Bifida and the Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis —United States, 1985–1994
    August 25, 1995 / Vol. 44 / No. SS-4 CDC Surveillance Summaries Surveillance for Anencephaly and Spina Bifida and the Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis —United States, 1985–1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta, Georgia 30333 The MMWR series of publications is published by the Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Public Health Service, U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30333. SUGGESTED CITATION General: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Surveillance Sum- maries, August 25, 1995. MMWR 1995;44(No. SS-4). Specific: [Author(s)]. [Title of particular article]. In: CDC Surveillance Sum- maries, August 25, 1995. MMWR 1995;44(No. SS-4):[inclusive page numbers]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .......................... David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D. Director The production of this report as an MMWR serial publication was coordinated in: Epidemiology Program Office.................................... Stephen B. Thacker, M.D., M.Sc. Director Richard A. Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Editor, MMWR Series Scott F. Wetterhall, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Editor, CDC Surveillance Summaries Scientific Information and Communications Program CDC Surveillance Summaries ...................................... Suzanne M. Hewitt, M.P.A. Managing Editor Rachel J. Wilson Ava W. Navin, M.A. Project Editors Peter M. Jenkins Visual Information Specialist Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Public Health Service or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Copies can be purchased from Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Birth Defects 2011-2012
    Massachusetts Birth Defects 2011-2012 Massachusetts Birth Defects Monitoring Program Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition Massachusetts Department of Public Health May 2016 Charles D. Baker, Governor Karyn E. Polito, Lieutenant Governor Marylou Sudders, Secretary, Executive Office of Health and Human Services Monica Bharel, MD, MPH, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Public Health Ron Benham, Director, Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Acting Director, Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Rebecca Liberman and Cathleen Higgins, Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention. We would like to thank the Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention staff who contributed to this report, including: Marlene Anderka, Xiaoli Chen, Dominique Heinke, Angela Lin, and Gerlinde Munshi. Data in this report have been collected through the efforts of Center field staff, including: Roberta Aucoin, Mitcheka Jalali, Washa Liu, Daniel Sexton, Lori Tetrault and Ashley Tracey. We would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their time and commitment in supporting the Center: Lewis Holmes, MD, MassGeneral Hospital for Children Carol Louik, ScD, Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Allen Mitchell, MD, Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Martha Werler, ScD, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health Ed Doherty, March of Dimes Massachusetts Chapter Massachusetts Registry of
    [Show full text]
  • Current Advances in Holt-Oram Syndrome Taosheng Huang, MD, Phd
    Current advances in Holt-Oram syndrome Taosheng Huang, MD, PhD Holt-Oram syndrome is an autosomal-dominant condition Clinical features characterized by congenital cardiac and forelimb anomalies. It Holt and Oram first described this syndrome when they is caused by mutations of the TBX5 gene, a member of the reported on a family with atrial septal defects and con- T-box family that encodes a transcription factor. Molecular genital anomalies of the thumbs [1]. Since then, about studies have demonstrated that mutations predicted to create 200 clinical papers have been published that further de- null alleles cause substantial abnormalities in both the limbs lineate the clinical features of Holt-Oram syndrome and heart, and that missense mutations of TBX5 can produce (HOS). The prevalence of HOS is 1 of 100,000 live distinct phenotypes. One class of missense mutations causes births, and it occurs with wide ethnic and geographic significant cardiac malformations but only minor skeletal distribution. Its clinical manifestations have proved to be abnormalities; others might cause extensive upper limb variable [2,3•,4•], but with complete penetrance. All pa- malformations but less significant cardiac abnormalities. tients with HOS have upper limb anomaly and about Intrafamilial variations of the malformations strongly suggest 85% to 95% have cardiac malformation. On the basis of that genetic background or modifier genes play an important these findings, the criteria for diagnosis include either role in the phenotypic expression of HOS. Efforts to the presence of cardiac malformations, conduction de- understand the intracellular pathway of TBX5 would provide a fects and radial ray abnormalities (or both) in an indi- unique window onto the molecular basis of common vidual, or the presence of radial ray abnormalities with or congenital heart diseases and limb malformations.
    [Show full text]
  • A CLINICAL STUDY of 25 CASES of CONGENITAL KEY WORDS: Ectromelia, Hemimelia, Dysmelia, Axial, Inter- LIMB DEFICIENCIES Calary
    PARIPEX - INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH Volume-7 | Issue-1 | January-2018 | PRINT ISSN No 2250-1991 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Medical Science A CLINICAL STUDY OF 25 CASES OF CONGENITAL KEY WORDS: Ectromelia, Hemimelia, Dysmelia, Axial, Inter- LIMB DEFICIENCIES calary M.B.B.S., D.N.B (PMR), M.N.A.M.S Medical officer, D.P.M.R., K.G Medical Dr Abhiman Singh University Lucknow (UP) An Investigation of 25 patients from congenital limb deficient patients who went to D. P. M. R. , K.G Medical University Lucknow starting with 2010 with 2017. This study represents the congenital limb deficient insufficient number of the India. Commonest deficiencies were Adactylia Also mid Ectromelia (below knee/ below elbow deficiency).Below knee might have been basic in male same time The following elbow for female Youngsters. No conclusive reason for the deformity might be isolated, however, A large number guardians accepted that possible exposure to the eclipse throughout pregnancy might have been those reason for ABSTRACT those deficiency. INTRODUCTION Previous Treatment Only 15 patients had taken some D. P. M. R., K.G Medical University Lucknow (UP) may be a greatest treatment, 5 underwent some surgical treatment and only 4 Also its identity or sort of Rehabilitation Centre in India. Thusly the patients used prosthesis. This indicates the ignorance or lack of limb deficient children attending this department can easily be facilities to deal with the limb deficient children. accepted as a representative sample of the total congenital limb deficiency population in the India. DEFICIENCIES The deficiencies are classified into three categories:- MATERIAL AND METHODS This study incorporates 25 patients congenital limb deficiency for 1) Axial Dysmelia where medial or lateral portion is missing lack who originated for medicine at D.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0210567 A1 Bevec (43) Pub
    US 2010O2.10567A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0210567 A1 Bevec (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 19, 2010 (54) USE OF ATUFTSINASATHERAPEUTIC Publication Classification AGENT (51) Int. Cl. A638/07 (2006.01) (76) Inventor: Dorian Bevec, Germering (DE) C07K 5/103 (2006.01) A6IP35/00 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A6IPL/I6 (2006.01) WINSTEAD PC A6IP3L/20 (2006.01) i. 2O1 US (52) U.S. Cl. ........................................... 514/18: 530/330 9 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 12/677,311 The present invention is directed to the use of the peptide compound Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-OH as a therapeutic agent for (22) PCT Filed: Sep. 9, 2008 the prophylaxis and/or treatment of cancer, autoimmune dis eases, fibrotic diseases, inflammatory diseases, neurodegen (86). PCT No.: PCT/EP2008/007470 erative diseases, infectious diseases, lung diseases, heart and vascular diseases and metabolic diseases. Moreover the S371 (c)(1), present invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions (2), (4) Date: Mar. 10, 2010 preferably inform of a lyophilisate or liquid buffersolution or artificial mother milk formulation or mother milk substitute (30) Foreign Application Priority Data containing the peptide Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-OH optionally together with at least one pharmaceutically acceptable car Sep. 11, 2007 (EP) .................................. O7017754.8 rier, cryoprotectant, lyoprotectant, excipient and/or diluent. US 2010/0210567 A1 Aug. 19, 2010 USE OF ATUFTSNASATHERAPEUTIC ment of Hepatitis BVirus infection, diseases caused by Hepa AGENT titis B Virus infection, acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, full minant liver failure, liver cirrhosis, cancer associated with Hepatitis B Virus infection. 0001. The present invention is directed to the use of the Cancer, Tumors, Proliferative Diseases, Malignancies and peptide compound Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-OH (Tuftsin) as a thera their Metastases peutic agent for the prophylaxis and/or treatment of cancer, 0008.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Morphology: Modifications to Size and Pattern
    Evolution of Morphology: Modifications to Size and Pattern The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Uygur, Aysu N. 2014. Evolution of Morphology: Modifications to Size and Pattern. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12274611 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Evolution of Morphology: Modifications to Size and Pattern A dissertation presented by Aysu N. Uygur to The Division of Medical Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Genetics Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May, 2014 iii © 2014 by Aysu N. Uygur All Rights Reserved iv Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Clifford J. Tabin Aysu N. Uygur Evolution of Morphology: Modifications to Size and Pattern Abstract A remarkable property of developing organisms is the consistency and robustness within the formation of the body plan. In many animals, morphological pattern formation is orchestrated by conserved signaling pathways, through a process of strict spatio-temporal regulation of cell fate specification. Although morphological patterns have been the focus of both classical and recent studies, little is known about how this robust process is modified throughout evolution to accomodate different morphological adaptations. In this dissertation, I first examine how morphological patterns are conserved throughout the enourmous diversity of size in animal kingdom.
    [Show full text]