DOCSLIB.ORG

Pastoral Community Development Project: Phases I and II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pastoral Community Development Project: Phases I and II ETHIOPIA Pastoral Community Development Project: Phases I and II Report No. 104210-ET MARCH 30, 2016 © 2016 International Bank for Reconstruction This work is a product of the staff of The World RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS and Development / The World Bank Bank with external contributions. The findings, The material in this work is subject to copyright. 1818 H Street NW interpretations, and conclusions expressed in Because The World Bank encourages Washington DC 20433 this work do not necessarily reflect the views of dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be Telephone: 202-473-1000 The World Bank, its Board of Executive reproduced, in whole or in part, for Internet: www.worldbank.org Directors, or the governments they represent. noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The Any queries on rights and licenses, including boundaries, colors, denominations, and other subsidiary rights, should be addressed to information shown on any map in this work do World Bank Publications, The World Bank not imply any judgment on the part of The Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC World Bank concerning the legal status of any 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: territory or the endorsement of acceptance of [email protected]. such boundaries. Report No. 104210-ET PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA PASTORAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PHASE I (COFN-04500, IDAH0380, TF- 52888) PASTORAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PHASE II (COFN-C1210, COFN-C1220, IDA-44580, IDA-H3950) March 30, 2016 IEG Sustainable Development Independent Evaluation Group ii Currency Equivalent Currency Unit = Ethiopian Birr USD 1.00 = Br 19 (Jan 2014) 2003 US$1.00 Br 8.55000032 2004 US$1.00 Br 8.69365037 2005 US$1.00 Br 8.72360031 2006 US$1.00 Br 8.79835034 2007 US$1.00 Br 9.20000018 2008 US$1.00 Br 9.92499975 Abbreviations and Acronyms APL Adaptable program loan CAP Community action plan CAS Country assistance strategy CDD Community-driven development CIF Community Investment Fund DPCF Disaster Preparedness and Contingency Fund DPCP Disaster Preparedness and Contingency Plan DPSIP Disaster Preparedness Strategic Investment Plan EWR Early warning and response EWRB Early warning and response bureau EWRD Early warning and response desk EWS Early warning system FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FPCU Federal Project Coordination Unit GDP Gross domestic product GNI Gross national income GTP Growth and Transformation Plan HDI Human Development Index HICE Household, Income, Consumption, and Expenditure (survey) ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report IDA International Development Association IEG Independent Evaluation Group IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IGA Income-generating activities M&E Monitoring and evaluation MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoFA Ministry of Federal Affairs MST Mobile support team MTR Mid-term review NGO Nongovernmental organization PAD Project appraisal document PASDEP Plan for Accelerated and Sustained Development Program PCDP I Pastoral Community Development Project – Phase I PCDP II Pastoral Community Development Project – Phase II PDO Project development objective PMU Project management unit iii PPAR Project Performance Assessment Report RUSACCO Rural savings and credit cooperative SNNPR Southern Nations, Nationalities and People's Region WDC Woreda Development Committee Glossary Woreda District Kebele A local community consisting of one or more villages Fiscal Year Government: July 8–July 7 Director-General, Independent Evaluation : Ms. Caroline Heider Director, IEG Financial, Private Sector & Sustainable Development : Mr. Marvin Taylor-Dormond Manager, IEG Sustainable Development (IEGSD) : Ms. Midori Makino Task Manager, IEGSD : Ms. Lauren Kelly v Contents Principal Ratings ............................................................................................................... vii Key Staff Responsible...................................................................................................... viii Preface................................................................................................................................. x Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... xi 1. Background and Context................................................................................................. 1 2. The Pastoral Community Development Program ........................................................... 5 Beneficiaries and Targeting ............................................................................................ 6 Financing......................................................................................................................... 6 Implementation Arrangements........................................................................................ 7 3. Pastoral Community Development Project – Phase I ..................................................... 8 Relevance of Project Objectives ..................................................................................... 9 Relevance of Project Design ......................................................................................... 10 Implementation ............................................................................................................. 11 Achievement of Objectives ........................................................................................... 14 Objective (1): Establish effective models of public service delivery and investment .. 17 Objective (2): Establish effective models of disaster management in pastoral areas. .. 22 Efficiency ...................................................................................................................... 24 Outcome ........................................................................................................................ 25 Risk to Development Outcome ..................................................................................... 25 Bank Performance ......................................................................................................... 26 Borrower Performance .................................................................................................. 27 4. Pastoral Community Development Project – Phase II .................................................. 28 Relevance of Project Objectives ................................................................................... 28 Relevance of Project Design ......................................................................................... 28 Implementation ............................................................................................................. 31 Objective (1): Improve the livelihoods of beneficiary communities ............................ 34 Objective (2): Increase the pastoralist communities’ resilience to external shocks ..... 41 Efficiency ...................................................................................................................... 44 Outcome ........................................................................................................................ 45 Risk to Development Outcomes ................................................................................... 46 Bank Performance ......................................................................................................... 48 This report was report was prepared by Lauren Kelly, Task Team Leader, Kendra White and Inder Sud, Consultants, IEG. It was peer and panel reviewed, respectively, by Marjory-Anne-Bromhead and Judy Twigg, Consultants, IEG. Marie Charles and Vibhuti Narang Khanna provided administrative support. vi Borrower Performance .................................................................................................. 48 5. Lessons .......................................................................................................................... 49 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 51 Annex A: Basic Data Sheet for Ethiopia Pastoral Community Development Project Phase I ......................................................................................................................................... 53 Annex B: Basic Data Sheet for the Ethiopia Pastoral Community Development Project Phase II.............................................................................................................................. 56 Annex C: Survey Data Sources on Income, Poverty, and Welfare in Ethiopia ................ 59 Annex D: Methodology for the PPAR Fieldwork: Unit of Analysis, Sampling Frame, Scope, and Tools ............................................................................................................... 63 Annex E: Semi-Structured Interview Tool ....................................................................... 66 Annex F: IEG Findings from Community Investment Fund Site Visits .......................... 71 Annex G: List of Persons Met .......................................................................................... 94 Annex H: Borrower Comments ........................................................................................ 97 Boxes Box 1.1: Applying Livelihoods Analysis to Understand the Characteristics of Pastoral
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism Brian Spooner University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Anthropology Papers Department of Anthropology 7-1971 Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism Brian Spooner University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Spooner, B. (1971). Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism. Anthropological Quarterly, 44 (3), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 3316939 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/67 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism Abstract The na thropological study of nomadism should be approached via cultural ecology and by the generative method. A preliminary generative model is presented, consisting of a series of seven rules. The first five are derived from the literature and are concerned with group formation. The asl t two are proposed by the writer with a view to making the articulation between group formation, social ecology and social organisation. Disciplines Anthropology | Social and Behavioral Sciences This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/67 TOWARDS A GENERATIVE MODEL OF NOMADISM BRtAN SPOONER University of Pennsylvania The anthropological study of nomadism should be ap- proached via cultural ecology and by the generative method. A preliminary generative model is presented, con- sisting of a series of seven rules. The first five are derived from the literature and are concerned with group forma- tion. The last two are proposed by the writer with a view to making the articulation between group formation, social ecology and social organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents East African Pastoralism and Underdevelopment: An Introduction Leif Manger Institutional Erosion in the Drylands: The Case of the Borana Pastoralists Johan Helland Changing Patterns of Resource Control among the Borana Pastoralists of Southern Ethiopia: A Lesson for Development Agencies Boku Tache Problems of Sustainable Resource Use among Pastoralist Societies: The Influence of State Intervention on the Pastoral Life of the Karrayyu Assefa Tolera Effecting Development: Reflections on the Transformation of Agro-Pastoral Production Systems in Eastern Sudan Salah Shazali Dryland Pastoralism among the Northern Bisharien of the Red Sea Hills, Sudan Omer A. Egemi The Struggle for Land Rights and the 1990 Squatter Uprisings in the Former Government Ranching Schemes of Uganda Frank Emmanuel Muhereza Challenging Encounters: Datoga Lives in Independent Tanzania Astrid Blystad Oral Traditions and Past Human Uses of Natural Resources: The Case of Iraqw'ar Da/aw, North- Central Tanzania Yusufu Q. Lawi Emissaries for Peace, Envoys for Management: external Relations and Drylands Management in the Zaghawa Sharif Harir Ethnicity and Scale Frode Storaas Dryland Soil Classification: Some Implications of Two Knowledge Systems Mustafa Babiker EAST AFRICAN PASTORALISM AND UNDERDEVELOPMENT: AN INTRODUCTION Leif Manger 1. THE EAST AFRICAN PASTORAL CRISIS It is a long established fact in studies on East African pastoralists that an understanding of pastoral adaptations cannot be limited to a man/land relationship in isolation, i.e., a focus
    [Show full text]
  • Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity South Asian Nomads
    Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity South Asian Nomads - A Literature Review Anita Sharma CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No. 58 January 2011 University of Sussex Centre for International Education The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme Consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Its purpose is to undertake research designed to improve access to basic education in developing countries. It seeks to achieve this through generating new knowledge and encouraging its application through effective communication and dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals, non-government organisations and other interested stakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledge and skill, is both a part of the definition of poverty, and a means for its diminution. Sustained access to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter- generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women, and reductions in inequality. The CREATE partners CREATE is developing its research collaboratively with partners in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The lead partner of CREATE is the Centre for International Education at the University of Sussex. The partners are:
    [Show full text]
  • Pastoralist Civil Societies Cooperative Empowerment Across Boundaries in Borderlands of Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia
    Pastoralist Civil Societies Cooperative empowerment across boundaries in borderlands of Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia Study of civil society in Eastern African border regions Report prepared by Immo Eulenberger in co-operation with Benedikt Kamski, Hannah Longole and Arnold Bergstraesser Institut (ABI) Published by Arnold Bergstraesser Institut Freiburg e.V. für kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung Windausstraße 16, 79110 Freiburg, Germany +0049-761-888780 www.arnold-bergstraesser.de on behalf of Robert Bosch Stiftung GmbH Heidehofstr. 31, 70184 Stuttgart, Germany +0049-711 46084-0 www.bosch-stiftung.de Authors: Immo Eulenberger (email: [email protected]), in cooperation with Benedikt Kamski, Hannah Longole The copy rights of all text and photos belong to the authors. 2 List of Acronyms ABI Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut for Social-Cultural Research AGEH Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Entwicklungshilfe (Germany) CBO Community based organization CGQ Catalogue of Guiding Questions CIDP County Integrated Development Plan CS Civil Society CUEA Catholic University of Eastern Africa DRYREQCOI Drylands Research & Qualification Consortium Initiative EPRDF Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front GDP Gross Domestic Product GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH GoE Government of Ethiopia GoK Government of Kenya GoU Government of Uganda GoSS Government of South Sudan GTP-I First Growth & Transformation Plan ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IRID Institute for Regional Integration and Development KDF Karamoja
    [Show full text]
  • Caste, Kinship and Sex Ratios in India
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CASTE, KINSHIP AND SEX RATIOS IN INDIA Tanika Chakraborty Sukkoo Kim Working Paper 13828 http://www.nber.org/papers/w13828 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2008 We thank Bob Pollak, Karen Norberg, David Rudner and seminar participants at the Work, Family and Public Policy workshop at Washington University for helpful comments and discussions. We also thank Lauren Matsunaga and Michael Scarpati for research assistance and Cassie Adcock and the staff of the South Asia Library at the University of Chicago for their generous assistance in data collection. We are also grateful to the Weidenbaum Center and Washington University (Faculty Research Grant) for research support. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2008 by Tanika Chakraborty and Sukkoo Kim. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Caste, Kinship and Sex Ratios in India Tanika Chakraborty and Sukkoo Kim NBER Working Paper No. 13828 March 2008 JEL No. J12,N35,O17 ABSTRACT This paper explores the relationship between kinship institutions and sex ratios in India at the turn of the twentieth century. Since kinship rules varied by caste, language, religion and region, we construct sex-ratios by these categories at the district-level using data from the 1901 Census of India for Punjab (North), Bengal (East) and Madras (South).
    [Show full text]
  • A Double Bind: the Exclusion of Pastoralist Women in the East And
    report A Double Bind: The Exclusion of Pastoralist Women in the East and Horn of Africa By Naomi Kipuri and Andrew Ridgewell A Karamojong girl returning from a dance in Kotido district, Uganda. The Karamojong are a cattle-herding, pastoralist people who live in semi-permanent settlements. Crispin Hughes/Panos Pictures Acknowledgements Minority Rights Group International Cordaid, Danchurch Aid, Danida, Government of Finland, Irish Minority Rights Group International (MRG) is a non- Aid, World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism, a programme governmental organization (NGO) working to secure the of the Global Environment Facility, implemented by UNDP rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and and executed by IUCN, the International Union for indigenous peoples worldwide, and to promote cooperation Conservation of Nature. Africa and Middle East Programme and understanding between communities. Our activities are Coordinator: Tadesse Tafesse. Commissioning Editor: Preti focused on international advocacy, training, publishing and Taneja. Report Editor: Sophie Richmond. outreach. We are guided by the needs expressed by our worldwide partner network of organizations, which represent The authors minority and indigenous peoples. Naomi Kipuri is a Maasai from the Kajiado District of Kenya. She is the executive director of the Arid Lands Institute in MRG works with over 150 organizations in nearly 50 Kenya, an organization involved in research, documentation countries. Our governing Council, which meets twice a year, and networking on policy and human rights concerns has members from 10 different countries. MRG has touching on indigenous pastoralists and hunter-gatherers in consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Eastern Africa. She is a member of the Working Group of Social Council (ECOSOC), and observer status with the Indigenous Populations/Communities of the African African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and of many (ACHPR).
    [Show full text]
  • Nomadism, Evolution and World-Systems: Pastoral Societies in Theories of Historical Development
    Nomadism, Evolution and World-Systems: Pastoral Societies in Theories of Historical Development Nikolay N. Kradin INTRODUCTION n the modern social sciences and history, there are four groups of theories that Ivariously explain basic principles of origin, further change and, sometimes, collapse of complex human social systems. Th e fi rst of these groups is the vari- ous unilinear theories of development or evolution (Marxism, neoevolutionism, modernization theories etc.). Th ey show how humanity has evolved from local groups of primitive hunters to the modern post-industrial world society. Th e second ones are theories of civilizations. Th e proponents of these theories argue that there is no unifi ed world history. Rather there are separate clusters of cul- tural activity that constitute qualitatively diff erent civilizations. Th e civilizations, like living organisms, are born, live and die (Spengler 1918; Toynbee 1934 etc.). Th e world-systems perspective and multilinear theories of social evolution are intermediate between these poles. Th e world-system approach (Wallerstein 1974 etc.; Chase-Dunn and Hall 1997; Sanderson 1999 etc.), like unilinear theo- ries of development distinguish three models of society: mini-systems, world- empires and world-economies. But they are considered in space rather than in time. Th is makes the conceptualisation of history more complete. Th e modern multilinear theories (Bondarenko and Korotayev 2000; Korotaev, Kradin, de Munk, Lynsha 2000 etc.) suppose that there are several possible paths of socio-political transformation. Some of these can lead to complexity, e.g. from a chiefdom to a true state; while others suppose the existence of the supercomplex community without a bureaucracy (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Policies and Strategies to Address the Vulnerability of Pastoralists in Sub-Saharan Africa Nikola Rass
    Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative Policies and Strategies to Address the Vulnerability of Pastoralists in Sub-Saharan Africa Nikola Rass A Living from Livestock PPLPI Working Paper No. 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ v 1. Executive Summary .............................................................................................. 1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 1 Pastoralism in Sub-Saharan Africa............................................................................. 1 The Vulnerability of Pastoral Livelihoods .................................................................... 2 Risk Management Policies/Strategies ......................................................................... 2 Diversification and Exit Strategies ............................................................................ 4 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................... 5 2. Introduction and Rationale ..................................................................................... 6 3. Pastoralism in East and West Africa........................................................................... 7 3.1 Definition of Pastoralism/Agro-Pastoralism ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle of the Marginalised in Somalia
    Africa 74 (4), 2004 DIFFERENCES THAT MATTER: THE STRUGGLE OF THE MARGINALISED IN SOMALIA Christian Webersik A NATION WITHOUT A STATE In many African states, ethnicity has been considered as a major obstacle to modem state-building causing political instability and violent conflict. In Somalia, political observers and analysts were more optimistic. They assumed Somalis share the same ethnicity, one religion, a common language and a predominantly pastoral culture: a predisposition for the development of modem nationalism. The egalitarian character of Somali society promised a political role model for other African states. Scholars argued that ethnicity, so commonly invoked as an explanation of conflict in contemporary African states, seemed less relevant here. And yet, Somalia was overtaken by a bloody civil war after the overthrow of Siyaad Barre's dictatorial regime in 1991, resulting in starvation and up to 280,000 deaths in 1991-92 (Hansch et al. 1994: 24). We are left to ask why a 'nation of poets' rooted in egalitarian and religious institutions turned to one of banditry and civil strife. I argue that the breakdown ofthe Somali regime can be explained by the unjust distribution of new sources of wealth in post-colonial Somalia rather than by existing 'internal divisions based on the ideology of kinship' (Lewis 2004). The purpose of the article is twofold: first, to suggest an explanation of the breakdown of Barre's dictatorial regime, and second to analyse the social consequences of political and economic exclusion that followed the state collapse. I argue that inequalities between groups (horizontal inequalities) are based on both material and imagined differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Pastoral Livelihoods and Conservation of Rangeland
    The Pakistan Journal of Forestry Vol.56(2), 2006 SECURING PASTORAL LIVELIHOODS IN ARID JUNIPER FOREST ZONE OF BALOCHISTAN, PAKISTAN A. W. Jasra1 and I. Ahmad2 Abstract Juniper (Juiperus excellsa) forests of Balochistan, Pakistan are one of the largest remnants of their kind on earth. Subsistence oriented pastoral livelihood of around two million people depends on these forests. This paper gives an analysis of the communities inhabiting the juniper zone and their livelihood sources; and suggestions for resource base improvement. These communities consist of settled/sedentary pastoralists, transhumant pastrolists and nomadic pastoralists. The sedentary community has shifted from pastrol livelihood to agra-pastoral, however, livestock still remains major component of its’ household economy. Water shortage has emerged as major problem for this community due to prolonged drought conditions and excessive mining of ground water for agriculture. The highest concern of transhumant community is the scarcity of forage and fuel wood at the winter stations. Animal health, prolonged droughts and feed shortage on migratory routes were the major problems of nomadic community. Poor marketing opportunities, high fodder prices, social intolerance and disease incidences are the other important issues. Multipurpose plant species like seabuckthorn and fourwing saltbush together with improved irrigation system and urea molasses blocks as supplemental feed have been identified as viable interventions for livelihood improvement. A policy dialogue is needed to resolve the problems of nomadic community. Key Words: Pastoralists, livelihood, Juniper Forest, Balochistan, Pakistan. Introduction Juniper forests of Ziarat and Loralai districts of Balochistan (25o to 32o N latitude and 60o to 72o E longitude), Pakistan are one of the largest remnants of their kind in the world (GOP, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Empowerment in Pastoral Societies
    WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT IN PASTORAL SOCIETIES Fiona Flintan SEPTEMBER 2008 ACRONYMS ABRDP Arsi Bale Rural Development Project AIWO African Indigenous Women’s Organisation AKRSP Aga Khan Rural Support Programme ALDEF Arid Lands Development Focus APDA Afar Pastoralist Development Association AU/IBAR African Union/Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources BRAC Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee BVW Basic veterinary workers CAHW Community animal health workers CBNRM Community based natural resource management CBO Community based organisation CEMIRIDE Centre for Minority Rights Development CRTC Chinmaya Rural Training Centre CIDA Canadian International Development Agency CMW Celebration of Mountain Women DAWN Development Alternatives for Women in New Era EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FGM Female genital mutilation GB Great Britan GEM Gender empowerment measure GL-CRSP Global Livestock – Collaborative Research and Support Program GOs Governmental organisations GTF Gudina Tumsa Foundation GWP Gobi Women’s Project HLFFDP Hills Leasehold Forestry and Forage Development Project HPI Heifer Project International IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee ICIMOD International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development ICRISAT International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics IDRC International Development Research Centre, Canada IED Innovations Environnement Développement IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute IIED International Institute for Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Policies That Work for Pastoral Environments a Six-Country Review of Positive Policy Impacts on Pastoral Environments
    POLICIES THAT WORK FOR PASTORAL ENVIRONMENTS A SIX-COUNTRY REVIEW OF POSITIVE POLICY IMPACTS ON PASTORAL ENVIRONMENTS Nairobi 2008 The World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (WISP) A project of the Global Environment Facility, Implemented by UNDP and executed by IUCN POLICIES THAT WORK FOR PASTORAL ENVIRONMENTS A SIX-COUNTRY REVIEW OF POSITIVE POLICY IMPACTS ON PASTORAL ENVIRONMENTS Nairobi 2008 The World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (WISP) A project of the Global Environment Facility, Implemented by UNDP and executed by IUCN i BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY Drylands cover about 40 percent of the Earth’s surface and they are particularly sensitive to land degradation, with 10-20% of drylands already degraded. This degradation is frequently attributed to overgrazing and mismanagement of resources by pastoralists, but over the past decade this has been consistently challenged and degradation has instead been attributed to a combination of constraints to pastoralism, through restrictions of mobility and privatisation of land, and substitution of pastoralism with less sustainable forms of livestock keeping. Research has shown that where mobility and locally owned institutions for land management are maintained, the results can be biodiversity conservation and sustainable land management. A growing body of opinion considers pastoralism to be the most viable form of production and land-use in the drylands, but it is also recognised that pastoralists often fall short of their potential due to legal, economic, social and political disincentives and barriers to mobility of livestock and to communal management of rangelands. In particular, government policies tend to be informed by the opinion that pastoralism is intrinsically harmful to the environment as well as being economically irrational, and a number of governments have adopted policy goals of sedentarizing pastoralists and transforming pastoralism.
    [Show full text]