A MARXIAN MODEL of NOMADIC PASTORALISM by RONALD LAWRENCE HOLT, B.A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A MARXIAN MODEL of NOMADIC PASTORALISM by RONALD LAWRENCE HOLT, B.A A MARXIAN MODEL OF NOMADIC PASTORALISM by RONALD LAWRENCE HOLT, B.A. A THESIS IN ANTHROPOLOGY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved ^ Accepted August, 1976 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to Professor Richard E. Salzer for his direction of this thesis and to Professor Philip A. Dennis for his criticism and advice. I would like to especially thank Lutf'ali Khan and Hamid Khan Kashkuli, my hosts in Iran, for their hospitality and friendship. My research was partially funded through a grant by Texas Tech University, College of Arts and Sciences, Institute for University Research. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES , . , . v CHAPTER I. THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL 1 Foreword 1 The Value of Models 3 Equilibrium and Conflict Theory 4 Marxian or Conflict Methodology 12 Previous Models of Nomadic Pastor- alism 15 II. THE TECHNO-ECONOMIC BASE 19 Environmental Relations . 22 Historical Determinants 26 III. PRODUCTION 30 Forces of Production 30 Means of Production 39 Relations of Production 42 IV. THE JURIDICO-POLITICAL SUPERSTRUCTURE .... 45 Kinship 46 Authority, Power, and Class ... 50 Law and Custom 58 111 CHAPTER V. THE IDEOLOGICAL SUPERSTRUCTURE 61 Religion 61 Ideological Reproduction .......... 63 VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 66 REFERENCES CITED 69 IV LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Conflict vs Equilibrium Theory ,..,,.. 11 2. Environmental Variables of Nomadic Pastoralism ........,«,.««. 27 3. Relative Herd Size ......«...«,. 37 4. Agricultural Production ....«...,• 38 CHAPTER I THE CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND Foreword The purpose of this thesis is to begin constructing a Marxian model of nomadic pastoralism in Southwest Asia. For the purposes of clarity and uniformity. Southwest Asia is defined as: Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (Barth 1960:341). This study centers on the sheep-goat complex and excludes the peoples whose primary occupation is herding camels, cattle, reindeer, or horses. For three months during the summer of 1975 I lived with the Kashkuli Kuchek, a tribe of nomadic pastoralists, in southern Iran. The Marxian orientation of this thesis derives from my observations and impressions of their class structure. I saw extremes of wealth and poverty existing side by side, separated only by the hereditary division of class. In seeking an explanation of this phenomenon I began to search the growing literature on social conflict. Con­ flict led me to the new Marxist interpretations in social anthropology. The discussion of social anthropology's traditional paradigm of structural-functionalism, versus the new empha­ sis on conflict oriented anthropology, reflects my theoretical interests and concerns. The use of empirical data on nomadic pastoralists illustrates both my areal interests, and an attempt to validate my Marxian model against the available data. This model will necessarily be limited in scope due to the structural-functional premises of the original data collectors. As of yet, there has been no attempt to con­ duct anthropological fieldwork among nomadic pastoralists using a conflict or Marxian research strategy. This limits the horizons of this paper, as most of it is drawn from library sources. However, by looking at the existing material on nomadic pastoralists in Southwest Asia, in Marxian terms, I hope to produce new insights and new ques­ tions for future fieldwork. The central proposition of this thesis is that a Marxian analysis will elicit data from new and old sources and order it in such a way as to better explain the social processes of nomadic pastoralism. I will attempt to gain a new perspective, a new ideological orientation in the study of pastoralism. My major expectation is that this model will supplement and challenge the current assumptions of the structural-functional paradigm in social anthropology. How­ ever, both approaches have merit, and illuminate different problems from differing points of view. The Value of Models Empirical observations are usually made within a prior conceptual framework. In theory this framework should be formulated and conceived through logic and the scientific method in advance of the actual observation. However, at times this conceptual framework may be only an afterthought, perhaps only cultural norms or a particular societal ideology disguised in scientific terminology. In the social sciences a broad but more formal con­ ceptual "model" is often used. A model, in its simplest form, is a general perception of how society is put together and works or fails to work. Models vary in scope from com­ plex mathmatical schematics to descriptive outlines. Models are necessarily less complex than reality. A model so complex as to explain every detail of. a social form would, by its very complexity, explain nothing. "A model is a simplification of reality, and that is its pur­ pose. Simpler models that convey as much about reality are preferable" (Francis 1972:8). Models have meaning in the abstract; they are a guide to the essential factors in a real-world situation. "A model, then, is a very general set of ideas and concepts—a point of view—that the scientist uses to select his problems, organize his thoughts, and pursue his inquiries" (Chambliss 19 73:2). We will define our conflict model as a set of analyti­ cal generalizations that guides and organizes our empirical data into statements about the social process. This Marxian model will focus on and describe various features of the nomadic social form. It is deterministic in that it assumes that the world is comprehensible, but it also assumes that random variables will render prediction possible only in a probabilistic framework. Equilibrium and Conflict Theory Structural-functionalism has been the major heuristic model or paradigm of social anthropology since the late 1930's (Harris 1968:514). The concept of " equilibrium" lies at the heart of the structural-functional argument. Equilibrium means that societies invent machanisms whose function it is to redirect conflict and reinforce the status quo. Self-regulating social equilibrium models focus on the processes that produce stability and continuity in society rather than on what produces change and disruption. Marxian conflict models, on the other hand, rest on the assumption that societies are always in flux, and that coercion, in its various forms, imposes a minimal change in the social formation. While equilibrium theory may be the child of Plato, its modern use can be traced back to Auguste Comte (1798-1857) and Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) (Russett 1966:3). The two major categories of equilibrium theory may be stipulated as "static" or "dynamic." Comte's equilibrium was "provisional, always changing and never settling down to a permanent posi­ tion of rest" (Russett 1966:35). While Spencer realized that all societies were not in total equilibrium, he was too enamored with the status quo to stress any aspect other than the stable "culmination of progress" (Ressett 1966:42). He wrote; Social statics may be aptly divided (as political economy has been) into statics and dynamics; the first treating of the equilibrium of a perfect society, the second of the forces by which it is advanced toward perfection (Spencer in Russett 1966:40). Where Comte spoke of order and progress, Durkheim (1958-1917) emphasized "social solidarity" (Harris 1968: 466). Durkheim's major contribution to equilibrium theory was the hypothesis that the "function" of many social phenomena was to preserve the unity and harmony of the society. While Pareto, Malinowski and Henderson certainly made great contributions to equilibrium theory, it was under the direction of Radcliffe-Brown, Homans, and Talcott Parsons that it assumed its present form. Radcliffe-Brown stressed the dichotomy between his structural-functionalism and the purely "welding torch" functionalism of Malinowski. According to Radcliffe- Brown, functional unity can be defined: ... as a condition in which all parts of a social system work together with sufficient degree of har­ mony of internal consistency, i.e., without pro­ ducing persistent conflicts which can neither be resolved nor regulated (Radcliffe-Brown 1952:181). George C. Homans describes equilibrium thus: . , . the state of the elements that enter the system and of the mutual relationships between them is such that any small change in one of the elements will be followed by changes in the other elements tending to reduce the amount of that change (1950:303-4). Talcott Parsons has constructed a "grand theory" of functionalism that presumes to deal with social change: The theory of change in the structure of social sys­ tems must, therefore, be a theory of particular sub- processes of change within such systems, not of the overall processes of change of the systems as sys­ tems (Parsons 1951:486). In other words, the structure of a society remains fixed, or only succumbs to "value" changes, while the func­ tional mechanisms or social organization may vary. Conflict theory, on the other hand, rests on the premise that change is endemic in society. Conflict is always present, but an effective society's coercive mechan­ isms are able to suppress or re-direct that conflict (Duke 1976:71). Modern conflict theory begins with Karl Marx (1818- 1883) "the social and political thinker of the nineteenth century" (Mills 1962:35). The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles (Marx and Engels 1967:79). Or more directly: Without conflict no progress: this is the law which civilization has followed to the present day (Marx and Engels 1967:103). Marx believed that the social organization of society was in a state of continuous change. Unlike Marx, many social scientists, oriented to structural-functionalism, strictly dichotomize society into "social organization" and "social structure." Social structure is the abstract ideal of society and social organization is the concrete observ­ able activity. This interpretation of dual structures focuses on change in the organization of society but seldom attempts an explanation of structural change.
Recommended publications
  • Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism Brian Spooner University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Anthropology Papers Department of Anthropology 7-1971 Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism Brian Spooner University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Spooner, B. (1971). Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism. Anthropological Quarterly, 44 (3), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 3316939 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/67 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Towards a Generative Model of Nomadism Abstract The na thropological study of nomadism should be approached via cultural ecology and by the generative method. A preliminary generative model is presented, consisting of a series of seven rules. The first five are derived from the literature and are concerned with group formation. The asl t two are proposed by the writer with a view to making the articulation between group formation, social ecology and social organisation. Disciplines Anthropology | Social and Behavioral Sciences This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/67 TOWARDS A GENERATIVE MODEL OF NOMADISM BRtAN SPOONER University of Pennsylvania The anthropological study of nomadism should be ap- proached via cultural ecology and by the generative method. A preliminary generative model is presented, con- sisting of a series of seven rules. The first five are derived from the literature and are concerned with group forma- tion. The last two are proposed by the writer with a view to making the articulation between group formation, social ecology and social organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents East African Pastoralism and Underdevelopment: An Introduction Leif Manger Institutional Erosion in the Drylands: The Case of the Borana Pastoralists Johan Helland Changing Patterns of Resource Control among the Borana Pastoralists of Southern Ethiopia: A Lesson for Development Agencies Boku Tache Problems of Sustainable Resource Use among Pastoralist Societies: The Influence of State Intervention on the Pastoral Life of the Karrayyu Assefa Tolera Effecting Development: Reflections on the Transformation of Agro-Pastoral Production Systems in Eastern Sudan Salah Shazali Dryland Pastoralism among the Northern Bisharien of the Red Sea Hills, Sudan Omer A. Egemi The Struggle for Land Rights and the 1990 Squatter Uprisings in the Former Government Ranching Schemes of Uganda Frank Emmanuel Muhereza Challenging Encounters: Datoga Lives in Independent Tanzania Astrid Blystad Oral Traditions and Past Human Uses of Natural Resources: The Case of Iraqw'ar Da/aw, North- Central Tanzania Yusufu Q. Lawi Emissaries for Peace, Envoys for Management: external Relations and Drylands Management in the Zaghawa Sharif Harir Ethnicity and Scale Frode Storaas Dryland Soil Classification: Some Implications of Two Knowledge Systems Mustafa Babiker EAST AFRICAN PASTORALISM AND UNDERDEVELOPMENT: AN INTRODUCTION Leif Manger 1. THE EAST AFRICAN PASTORAL CRISIS It is a long established fact in studies on East African pastoralists that an understanding of pastoral adaptations cannot be limited to a man/land relationship in isolation, i.e., a focus
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of Pastoral Nomads to Multiple Socio-Political and Climate Stresses – the Shahsevan of Northwest Iran
    Pastoralism under Pressure: Vulnerability of Pastoral Nomads to Multiple Socio-political and Climate Stresses – The Shahsevan of Northwest Iran Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Asghar Tahmasebi aus Tabriz/Iran Bonn 2012 Angefertigt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes (DAAD) 1. Referent: Prof.Dr. Eckart Ehlers 2. Referent: Prof.Dr. Winfried Schenk Tag der Promotion: June 25, 2012 Erscheinungsjahr: 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. i List of maps ..................................................................................................................................... iv List of tables .................................................................................................................................... iv List of figures ................................................................................................................................... vi List of Persian words ....................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dissertation-Final-Bryan.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts NATURE AND THE NEW SOUTH: COMPETING VISIONS OF RESOURCE USE IN A DEVELOPING REGION, 1865-1929 A Dissertation in History by William D. Bryan 2013 William D. Bryan Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2013 The dissertation of William D. Bryan was reviewed and approved* by the following: William A. Blair Liberal Arts Professor of American History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Mark E. Neely McCabe Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Solsiree Del Moral Assistant Professor of History Robert Burkholder Associate Professor of English Adam Rome Associate Professor of History and English The University of Delaware Special Member David G. Atwill Director of Graduate Studies in History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines conflicting visions for natural resource use and economic development in the American South in the years between the end of the Civil War and the beginning of the Great Depression. Emancipation toppled the region’s economy and led many Southerners to try to establish a “New South” to replace their antebellum plantation society. Their task was unprecedented, and necessitated completely reimagining the economic structure of the entire region. Although most Southerners believed that the region was blessed with abundant natural resources, there were many competing ideas about how these resources should be used in order to achieve prosperity. By examining how these different visions shaped New South economic development, this dissertation reconsiders a longstanding interpretation of the postbellum American South, and provides a fresh historical perspective on the challenges of sustainable development in underdeveloped places worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomadic Pastoralism and Agricultural Modernization
    NOTES AND COMMENTS NOMADIC PASTORALISM AND AGRICULTURAL MODERNIZATION Robert Rice State University ofNew York INTRODUCTION This paper presents a model for the integration of pastoral nomads into nation-states. To this. end, two areas of the world in which pastoral nomadism had been predominent within historic times-Central Asia and West Africa-were examined. Security considerations tended to overshadow economic considerations in the formation of state policy toward nomadic peoples in the two areas. However, a broader trend, involving the expansion of the world economic system can also be discerned. This pattern held constant under both capitalistic and socialistic governments. In recent times, the settlement of pastoral nomads and their integration into national economies has become a hotly debated issue in a number of developing nations. Disasters such as the Sahel drought and famine in the early 1970s have brought world attention on the economic and ecological consequences of nomad­ ism and settlement. Similarly, armed uprisings by nomadic peoples against the governments of Morocco, Ethiopia, the Chad, Iran and Afghanistan have brought the politicalgrievances..0J nomads _ to world attention. This' paper will compare two attempts by modern nation states to transform the traditional economies of nomadic pastoralist Soviet Central Asia and West Africa. In both cases the development policies pursued by the central government sought to change the traditional power relationship within nomad­ ic society, as well as its economic activities. These policies were a natural outgrowth of attempts by the central governments in­ volved to integrate nomadic peoples into the larger world econ­ omy. Two schools of thought have emerged from the debate over the future of nomadic pastoralism.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and the Struggle to Survive in the Fuuta Tooro Region Of
    What Development? Poverty and the Struggle to Survive in the Fuuta Tooro Region of Southern Mauritania Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Christopher Hemmig, M.A. Graduate Program in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures. The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Sabra Webber, Advisor Morgan Liu Katey Borland Copyright by Christopher T. Hemmig 2015 Abstract Like much of Subsaharan Africa, development has been an ever-present aspect to postcolonial life for the Halpulaar populations of the Fuuta Tooro region of southern Mauritania. With the collapse of locally historical modes of production by which the population formerly sustained itself, Fuuta communities recognize the need for change and adaptation to the different political, economic, social, and ecological circumstances in which they find themselves. Development has taken on a particular urgency as people look for effective strategies to adjust to new realities while maintaining their sense of cultural identity. Unfortunately, the initiatives, projects, and partnerships that have come to fruition through development have not been enough to bring improvements to the quality of life in the region. Fuuta communities find their capacity to develop hindered by three macro challenges: climate change, their marginalized status within the Mauritanian national community, and the region's unfavorable integration into the global economy by which the local markets act as backwaters that accumulate the detritus of global trade. Any headway that communities can make against any of these challenges tends to be swallowed up by the forces associated with the other challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity South Asian Nomads
    Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity South Asian Nomads - A Literature Review Anita Sharma CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No. 58 January 2011 University of Sussex Centre for International Education The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme Consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Its purpose is to undertake research designed to improve access to basic education in developing countries. It seeks to achieve this through generating new knowledge and encouraging its application through effective communication and dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals, non-government organisations and other interested stakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledge and skill, is both a part of the definition of poverty, and a means for its diminution. Sustained access to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter- generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women, and reductions in inequality. The CREATE partners CREATE is developing its research collaboratively with partners in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The lead partner of CREATE is the Centre for International Education at the University of Sussex. The partners are:
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation, Land and Nomadic Pastoralism: Seeking Solutions in the Wadi #Araba of Jordan
    seeking solutions in the wadi #araba of jordan 759 CONSERVATION, LAND AND NOMADIC PASTORALISM: SEEKING SOLUTIONS IN THE WADI #ARABA OF JORDAN Alan Rowe The challenge of engaging the active support and participation of communities in Protected Areas for the purpose of biodiversity conservation is one which has met with varying degrees of success worldwide, despite the substantive progress made through recent collaborative management approaches. The indigenous peoples of the world have been particularly vulnerable to the impositions of conservationists, due to political marginalization and their traditional dependence upon natural resources (McNeely 2002). Where such communities are mobile in their resource use, an extra dimension of complexity is added to the relationship between community needs and conservation objectives. Conservation through the establishment of protected areas in the Middle East and North Africa has had a very mixed record of success (Chatty 2002). The countries of this region protect signifi- cantly less than the area recommended by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) for protection, and it has been estimated that only about a third of these Protected Areas are effectively managed to any degree (Ayyad 1996). The effectiveness of conservation measures in the region has hitherto been limited by a number of factors. Among these are the lack of political plurality in the region (which hinders and undermines the introduction of collaborative approaches to conservation), the marginalized status of many of the social groups which traditionally inhabit wilderness areas, poor public awareness and understanding of environmental issues, problems of economic development and insufficient resourc- ing and capacity building for regional conservation agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research Paper the Origins of Nomadic Pastoralism in the Eastern Jordanian Steppe
    Manuscript Click here to access/download;Manuscript;Miller et al The Origins of Nomadic Pastoralism.docx Original Research Paper The origins of nomadic pastoralism in the eastern Jordanian steppe: a combined stable isotope and chipped stone assessment Holly Miller1, Douglas Baird2, Jessica Pearson2, Angela L. Lamb3, Matt Grove2, Louise Martin4 and Andrew Garrard4. The circumstances in which domestic animals were first introduced to the arid regions of the Southern Levant and the origins of nomadic pastoralism, have been the subject of considerable debate. Nomadic pastoralism was a novel herd management practice with implications for the economic, social and cultural development of Neolithic communities inhabiting steppe and early village environs. Combining faunal stable isotope and chipped stone analysis from the Eastern Jordanian Neolithic steppic sites of Wadi Jilat 13 and 25, and ‘Ain Ghazal in the Mediterranean agricultural zone of the Levantine Corridor, we provide a unique picture of the groups exploiting the arid areas. Key words Neolithic; stable isotopes; nomadic pastoralism; lithic analysis; fauna. Introduction Some of the earliest evidence for domestic sheep and goats herds in the Eastern Jordanian steppe has been recovered from the sites of Wadi Jilat 13 and 25 at the beginning of the seventh millennium cal. BC (Garrard 1998; Garrard et al. 1994b; Martin 1999; Martin and Edwards 2013), although the possibility of their introduction in the Late Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (henceforth LPPNB) 1 Holly Miller (corresponding author) Department of Classics and Archaeology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. email: [email protected], telephone: +44 (0)115 951 4813, ORCHiD: 0000-0002- 0394-9444 2 Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anthropology of Development Anthropology 3501.10 Fall 2014
    The Anthropology of Development Anthropology 3501.10 Fall 2014 Tuesdays and Thursdays, 3.45-5.00 pm Funger Hall 221 (Tuesdays) & Corcoran Hall 106 (Thursdays) Dr. Robert Shepherd [email protected] Office: 601-F, 1957 E Street Office Hours: Mondays & Wednesdays, 1-3 pm This course examines the theoretical and practical implications of the process of development as a planned intervention into social action. Our readings and discussions are centered on the following questions about development and the role it plays in contemporary life, both among Northern aid-giving states and Southern targets of development. • What is the relationship between development practices and state building? • What are the historical origins of these practices? • What are the theoretical assumptions embedded within development? • What role do market forces have within development and how do these reflect assumptions about human motivation, interests, and action? • What constitutes ‘sustainable’ development? At the end of this course you should be able to: • Understand the historical basis of contemporary international development; • Articulate how development practices have changed over time; • Explain the key concepts and assumptions that constitute an anthropological approach to development, and how these may differ from the assumptions of development practitioners and other disciplines; • Understand key terms including neoliberalism, discourse, agency, governmentality, sustainability, and modernity; • Reflect on the meanings of sustainability in the context
    [Show full text]
  • Coaching the Global Nomad Katrina Burrus, PH.D., M.C.C
    Coaching the Global Nomad Katrina Burrus, PH.D., M.C.C. This article first appeared in the International Journal of Coaching in Organizations, 2006, 4(4),6-15. It can only be reprinted and distributed with prior written permission from Professional Coaching Publications, Inc. (PCPI). Email John Lazar at [email protected] for such permission. Journal information: www.ijco.info Purchases: www.pcpionline.com 2006 ISSN 1553-3735 © Copyright 2006 PCPI. All rights reserved worldwide. 6 | IJCO Issue 4 2006 6 | IJCO Issue 4 2006 Coaching the Global Nomad Coaching the Global Nomad KATRINA BURRUS, PH.D., M.C.C. KATRINA BURRUS, PH.D., M.C.C. Executives who work in various PROLOGUE – IN THE BEGINNING Executives who work in various PROLOGUE – IN THE BEGINNING cultures bring a multitude of cultural I was fiveyears old, playing on the living room couch, when my mother cultures bring a multitude of cultural I was fiveyears old, playing on the living room couch, when my mother backgrounds, identities, and called out to me from the kitchen that we were going to move again. backgrounds, identities, and called out to me from the kitchen that we were going to move again. orientations with them. They are Having already left the US, Italy, and then Germany, we were now orientations with them. They are Having already left the US, Italy, and then Germany, we were now called in to new situations because moving to Switzerland. My father started up a soft drink brand in Italy. called in to new situations because moving to Switzerland. My father started up a soft drink brand in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Wealth? What Is Wealth Creation and What Is Wealth Conversion?
    An essay to set the tone What is Wealth? What is Wealth Creation and what is Wealth Conversion? What is the relationship between Wealth and Technology? Wealth creation occurs when Matter and Energy and Intelligence are combined to enable humans to live better. Intelligence Wealth is a human value and humanity’s values change, based on circumstances. For nomads, wealth was livestock. The more sheep and cattle the tribe owned the richer they were. For the Haida Indians of the Pacific Northwest, where the food supply of fish and game was naturally abundant year Wealth round, wealth was the opposite. The richest person was the one who could give away the most in the potlatch ceremony. Matter Predation Energy Wealth conversion occurs when no value is added, but Pollution Poverty one party takes wealth created by another. It also occurs when wealth is created but someone else gets saddled with negative side effects such as predation, pollution or impoverishment. Strip mining where no land restoration occurs afterwards Let us agree that on earth reality consists of three comes to mind. When a warrior says to a farmer he will protect spheres: matter, energy and intelligence. him from another warrior who wants to steal the farmer’s On earth, matter is a closed system – all the matter food, both warriors are converting wealth. When a lawyer which exists has always been here, all we can do is convert it writes a contract to assure two parties will mutually create from one form to another. Earth holds 6 sextillion tons of more wealth, that clarity is wealth creating.
    [Show full text]