Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern August 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern August 2020 REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN UPDATE for the MILWAUKEE ESTUARY AREA OF CONCERN AUGUST 2020 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Office of Great Waters Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern August 2020 Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern This Remedial Action Plan includes updates from January 2018 through April 2020. Compiled by Brennan Dow Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern Coordinator Division of Environmental Management – Office of Great Waters Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2300 N. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Milwaukee, WI 53212 (414) 263-8651 [email protected] With Input and Contributions From: Aaron Schiller, WDNR Cheryl Masterson, WDNR Chris Dietrich, WDNR Donalea Dinsmore, WDNR Gina LaLiberte, WDNR Kendra Axness, WDNR Lee Delcore, WDNR Madeline Magee, WDNR Marty Johnson, WDNR Meghan Williams, WDNR Michelle Soderling, WDNR Olivia Colaianni, WDNR Rebecca Fedak, WDNR Scott Inman, WDNR Sean Strom, WDNR Stacy Hron, WDNR Steve Galarneau, WDNR Xiaochun Zhang, WDNR Management Action Implementation Team (MAIT) Andrew Struck, Ozaukee County Jen Francis, Milwaukee County Parks Benji Timm, City of Milwaukee Jennifer Bolger Breceda, Milwaukee Brennan Dow, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Riverkeeper Corey Zetts, Menomonee Valley Partners Kevin Shafer, MMSD (Chair) Dave Misky, City of Milwaukee Lilith Fowler, Harbor District, Inc. Jamie Ferschinger, Sixteenth Street Community Natalie Dutack, Milwaukee County Parks Health Centers Sarah Toomsen, Milwaukee County Parks i Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern August 2020 Stacy Hron, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Tom Chapman, MMSD Vicki Elkin, FFLM (Vice Chair) Project Management Team (MAIT Subcommittee) Coordinated by Tom Chapman Benji Timm, City of Milwaukee Natalie Dutack, Milwaukee County Parks Brennan Dow, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Sarah Toomsen, Milwaukee County Parks Marie Kopka, USACE Stacy Hron, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Megan O’Brien, EPA GLNPO Travis Schroeder, WDNR – Bureau of Michelle Soderling, WDNR – Office of Great Waterways Waters Fish and Wildlife Technical Advisory Committee (Tech Team) Coordinated by Brennan Dow Aaron Schiller, WDNR – Bureau of Fish Laura Schmidt, WDNR – Bureau of Fish Management Management Aaron Zeleske, Harbor District, Inc. Megan O’Brien, EPA GLNPO Andrew Struck, Ozaukee County Michelle Soderling, WDNR – Office of Great Andrew Stevens, USFWS Waters Brian Russart, Milwaukee County Parks Natalie Dutack, Milwaukee County Parks Cheryl Nenn, Milwaukee Riverkeeper Rebecca Fedak, WDNR – Office of Great Craig Helker, WDNR – Bureau of Water Quality Waters Dianne Robinson, WDNR – Bureau of Wildlife Sharon Fandel, WDNR – Bureau of Natural Management Heritage Conservation Emilie Burmeister, Milwaukee County Parks Stacy Hron, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Faith Fitzpatrick, USGS Todd Polacek, Applied Ecological Services Gary Casper, UWM Field Station Tom Burzynski, WDNR – Bureau of Fish Hayley Olds, USGS Management Jeff Houghton, UWM Tom Chapman, MMSD Joanna Demas, River Revitalization Foundation Tom Sear, Citizen – Water Resources Engineer John Janssen, UWM Tom Slawski, Southeast WI Regional Planning Kim Forbeck, Urban Ecology Center Commission Kristina Betzold, WDNR – Bureau of Will Wawrzyn, Citizen – Fisheries Biologist Environmental Analysis and Sustainability Beaches Work Group Coordinated by Brennan Dow Cheryl Nenn, Milwaukee Riverkeeper Jack Sudar, Milwaukee County Dept. of Deborah Dila, UWM Administrative Services Donalea Dinsmore, WDNR – Office of Great Jean Schultz, City of Milwaukee Health Dept. Waters Lindor Schmidt, City of Milwaukee Health Dept. Hayley Olds, USGS Madeline Magee, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Therese Gripentrog, Milwaukee County Parks ii Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern August 2020 Megan O’Brien, USEPA GLNPO Sandra McLellan, UWM Michelle Soderling, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Sarah Toomsen, Milwaukee County Parks Nick Tomaro, City of Milwaukee Health Dept. Stacy Hron, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Rebecca Fedak, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Steve Keith, Milwaukee County Dept. of Samantha Katt, WDNR – Bureau of Watershed Administrative Services Management Sediment Work Group Coordinated by Dave Misky Aaron Zeleske, Harbor District, Inc. Kristin Kurzka, Sigma Adam Schlict, Port Milwaukee Larry Sullivan, Citizen – Engineering Consultant Benji Timm, City of Milwaukee Lilith Fowler, Harbor District, Inc. Bob Paulson, We Energies Megan O’Brien, EPA GLNPO Brennan Dow, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Melissa Bosman, USACE Brian Kasprzyk, Port Milwaukee Natalie Dutack, Milwaukee County Parks Caitie Nigrelli, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Olivia Colaianni, WDNR – Office of Great Carrie Webb, WDNR – Remediation & Waters Redevelopment Rebecca Fedak, WDNR – Office of Great Cheryl Nenn, Milwaukee Riverkeeper Waters Chris Dietrich, WDNR – Remediation & Rob Stanick, USACE Redevelopment Sarah Toomsen, Milwaukee County Parks Corey Zetts, Menomonee Valley Partners Scott Cieniawski, EPA GLNPO Gerry Demers, Waste Management Scott Inman, WDNR – Remediation & Guy Smith, Milwaukee County Parks Redevelopment Heather Williams, EPA GLNPO Stacy Hron, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Huck Raddemann, Jacobs Steve Galarneau, WDNR – Office of Great Jennifer Bolger Breceda, Milwaukee Waters Riverkeeper Steve Garbaciak, Foth Jennifer Miller, USACE Susan Henshaw, USACE Jim Killian, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Susan Prout, EPA GLNPO John Budzinski, WDNR – Acting SER Tom Chapman, MMSD Secretary’s Director Tom OBryan, USACE Jon Imbrunone, USACE Trevor Nobile, WDNR – Remediation & Josh Hachey, USACE Redevelopment Judy Fassbender, WDNR – Remediation & Vicki Elkin, FFLM Redevelopment Kristen Isom, EPA GLNPO Communications and Outreach Team Coordinated by Rebecca Fedak Anne Michalski, Milwaukee Riverkeeper Jen Francis, Milwaukee County Parks Christina Taddy, MMSD Megan O’Brien, EPA GLNPO Ian Everett, Milwaukee County Parks Michelle Kramer, Menomonee Valley Partners Jeff Fleming, City of Milwaukee Natalie Dutack, Milwaukee County Parks iii Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern August 2020 Olivia Colaianni, WDNR – Office of Great Raechelle Cline, WDNR – Office of Waters Communications Susan Tesarik, WDNR – Office of Great Waters Community Advisory Committee Leadership Team Andrew Struck, Ozaukee County Janee Pederson, HNTB Chris Litzau, Great Lakes CCC Aaron Zeleske, Harbor District, Inc. Cheryl Nenn, Milwaukee Riverkeeper (Chair) Cover Photo: Taken by Stacy Hron, WDNR Lake Michigan Program Coordinator, along the Milwaukee River where the Estabrook Dam was removed as part of an Area of Concern management action in 2018. Disclaimer The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) is a non-regulatory agreement between the U.S. and Canada, and criteria developed under its auspices are non-regulatory. The actions identified in this document as needed to meet beneficial use impairment (BUI) delisting targets are not subject to enforcement or regulatory actions. The actions identified in this Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Update do not constitute a list of preapproved projects, nor is it a list of projects simply related to BUIs or generally to improve the environment. Actions identified in this document are directly related to removing a BUI and are needed to delist the Area of Concern (AOC). iv Remedial Action Plan Update for the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose Statement ................................................................................................................... 1 Progress Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 Sediment ............................................................................................................................... 3 Management Action Implementation ..................................................................................... 6 Assessments ......................................................................................................................... 8 Area of Concern Working Groups & Roles ...........................................................................10 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................11 BENEFICIAL USE IMPAIRMENT UPDATES ........................................................................... 16 RESTRICTIONS ON DREDGING ACTIVITIES ....................................................................16 FISH TUMORS OR OTHER DEFORMITIES ........................................................................23 BIRD OR ANIMAL DEFORMITIES OR REPRODUCTIVE PROBLEMS ...............................25 RESTRICTIONS ON FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSUMPTION ..............................................27 DEGRADATION OF BENTHOS ...........................................................................................29 DEGRADATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON AND ZOOPLANKTON POPULATIONS ...............31 LOSS OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT ...........................................................................33 DEGRADATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE POPULATIONS ................................................35 BEACH CLOSINGS (RECREATIONAL RESTRICTIONS) ....................................................39 EUTROPHICATION OR UNDESIRABLE ALGAE .................................................................42 DEGRADATION
Recommended publications
  • East Indian Bronze Figures of Ganesh, 19Th/20Th
    Lot Description Price (lot of 6) East Indian bronze figures of Ganesh, 19th/20th century, featuring four in dancing poses, one 1 multi-armed and one silvered seated, 9''h; Provenance: The Hemphill Collection of San Francisco $ 150 (lot of 7) East Indian bronze oil lamps, 19th/20th century, consisting of two standing beauties, hand lamp with figure of elephant, Ganesh base lamp, spoon shaped lamp, peacock lamp, Himalayan lamp, 8.5''h; 2 Provenance: The Hemphill Collection of San Francisco $ 175 Asian bronze seated Hotei on dragon throne, 20th century, holding a strand of praying beads and a bag 5 with traces of gilt, 8.5''h; Provenance: The Hemphill Collection of San Francisco $ 200 (lot of 2) Thai gilt bronze Buddhist figures, 19th century, figures each seated on tiered pedestals, some 7 damages, 17''h; Provenance: The Hemphill Collection of San Francisco $ 125 (lot of 6) group of Himalayan silver gilt metal votive pieces, 20th century, consisting of a table top prayer 8 wheel, a bowl, three rings, and a finial, 7.5''h; Provenance: The Hemphill Collection of San Francisco $ 175 (lot of 5) Assortment of Himalayan/Tibetan religious objects, consisting of a bronze bell with a vajra finial, a small bronze floral form stem cup, a copper phurba and a copper gao, 6.75''h; Provenance: The Hemphill 9 Collection of San Francisco $ 150 (lot of 6) Nepalese seated copper alloy Buddhas, 20th century, five are holding medicine jars, one with 11 hands in mudra, 5.5''h; Provenance: The Hemphill Collection of San Francisco $ 125 (Lot of 3) Chinese green
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscape Inventory December 2005 (Revisions Aug 2011)
    Camp Randall Memorial Park Cultural Landscape Inventory December 2005 (Revisions Aug 2011) Quinn Evans|Architects University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Division of Facilities Planning and Management ©2011, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System University of Wisconsin-Madison Cultural Landscape Inventory DEFINITIONS What is a “cultural landscape”? The following document is based on concepts and techniques developed by the National Park Service (NPS). The NPS has produced a series of manuals for identifying, describing, and maintaining culturally significant landscapes within the national park system.1 The National Park Service defines a cultural landscape as a geographic area, including both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife or domestic animals therein[,] associated with a historic event, activity, or person, or [one] that exhibits other cultural or aesthetic values.2 In 1925, geographer Carl Sauer (1889-1975) summarized the process that creates cultural landscapes: “Culture is the agent, the natural area is the medium, the cultural landscape the result.” 3 Similarly, the writer J. B. Jackson (1909-1996) looked upon the landscape as a composition of spaces made or modified by humans “to serve as infrastructure or background for our collective existence.”4 What is a “cultural landscape inventory”? 5 This cultural landscape inventory for Camp Randall Memorial Park is one of eight such studies completed as part of the UW-Madison Cultural Landscape Resource Plan. Each inventory defines the boundaries of a distinct cultural landscape on campus, summarizes its history, describes its current condition, and makes recommendations about its treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Trunk South Shore Terrace Discovery World Summerfest
    “Biological Hotspots” of the Lower Milwaukee Estuary Technical Habitat Map Brennan Dow Adviser: John Janssen http://city.milwaukee.gov/port#.WIjklFw8q6g Lake Sturgeon Green Breakwall North Avenue Dam Dave Schindelholz, Jeff Zinuticz, Pradeep Hirethota Smallmouth Bass The North Avenue Dam spawning reef was reconstructed in 2014 to provide better spawning habitat for Lake Sturgeon, Walleye and redhorse. Stocking efforts for Lake Sturgeon in Milwaukee started in 2003. Return of Lake Sturgeon for spawning in the Milwaukee River will 1:800 occur when they reach maturity (25 to 30 years for females and about 15 years for males). This section of the river also provides much needed rocky habitat for other fish species. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources With the invasion of the round goby in 1994 and more recently Hemimysis Walleye Lake Sturgeon anomala in 2006, an established, Hemimysis anomala abundant, nearshore forage base for littoral zone predators was created. While this forage biomass is comprised of mostly invasive species, predators do not know the difference and are now more 1:2,500 localized than they have been in the past. Discovery World Jeff Zinuticz & Cheryl Masterson Tom Burzynski Summerfest Lagoon South Menomonee Canal Black-Crowned Night-Heron Largemouth Bass Spawning The Burnham Canal is a good example of “accidental” spawning habitat. Bluegill, Green Sunfish, and Largemouth Rock Bass Spawning Bass that displayed spawning characteristics, occupy small Burnham Canal sections of collapsed dock walls with overhanging cover. In 2018, the west side of the canal is to undergo a large remediation and ecosystem restoration project. Bathymetry (meters) 0.50 - 0.75 1:3,000 0.76 - 1.00 Largemouth Bass Nest 1.01 - 1.25 1.26 - 1.50 1.51 - 1.75 1.76 - 2.00 2.01 - 2.25 2.26 - 2.50 Bluegill Largemouth Bass Fry 2.51 - 2.75 The Summerfest The seiche dominated inlet, which is attached to Lagoon is a biological 2.76 - 3.00 the Grand Trunk wetland, is an important area for hotspot that acts as a spawning bluegill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functioning AFS Network Bill Fisher Reflects As His Year As President of AFS Comes to an End
    VOL 37 NO 8 FisheriesAmerican Fisheries Society • www.fisheries.org AUG 2012 Translocating Adult Pacific Lamprey Standardized Monitoring of Fish Populations Demographic Diversity in Natural Resource Science Professions Tilapia in South India Annual Report Inside 03632415(2012)37(8) Specializing in RFID products, expert customer service & biological consulting to the fisheries, wildlife & conservation communities for over 20 years. BIOMARK MULTIPLEXING TRANSCEIVER SYSTEM (IS1001-MTS) Biomark’s Multiplexing Transceiver System FS1001M “MUX” IS1001 “ACN” IS1001-MC (IS1001-MTS) is our newest stationary Input Voltage 24V DC 24V DC range 18–30V DC 24V DC range 18–30V DC reader; providing decoding of ISO Antenna Current 7.0 Ap-p 10.0 Ap-p 10.0 Ap-p 11784/11785 compliant FDX-B & HDX PIT tags. The MTS provides improved Auto-tuning 12 capacitors, 10 capacitors, 10 capacitors, electronically switched electronically switched electronically switched performance, with respect to detection range and number of antennas, over Tags Read 134.2 FDX-B 134.2 FDX-B & HDX 134.2 FDX-B & HDX the current FS1001M stationary reader. Virtual Test Tag Yes, digitally adjustable Yes, digitally adjustable Yes, digitally adjustable The MTS consists of a Master Controller Data Storage 1 x 128 KB: 5350 tags; 2 x 128 KB: 8900 tags; 2 x 128 KB: 15,600 tags; (IS1001-MC) and up to 12 IS1001 reader 146 status reports 151 status reports 151 status reports boards. The IS1001-MC acts as the Antenna Connections 6, multiplexed 1 12, multiplexed/synchronized command and control center for the Communication 1: RS232, DB-9 2 standard USB (Mini-B), 2 standard USB (Mini-B), system, directing each reader when to Ports CAN Bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2008 Volume 31, Number 3
    BSI3103_Fall08 9/16/08 2:53 PM Page a A Publication of Building Stone Institute Fall 2008 Volume 31, Number 3 20082008 BSIBSI BYBEEBYBEE PRIZE PRIZE 20082008 BSIBSI TUCKERTUCKER DESIGNDESIGN AWARDSAWARDS BSI FullPage Template 9/10/07 11:09 AM Page 1 BSI FullPage Template 9/9/08 4:44 PM Page 1 BSI3103_Fall08 9/16/08 2:51 PM Page 2 A Publication of Building Stone Institute Volume 31 • Number 3 Fall 2008 10 Photo courtesy of Pei Cobb Freed & Partners Architects LLC Features Departments 6 President's Message BSI Bybee Prize 8 Awards Reception 9 Jurors 10 Henry N. Cobb: Fulfillment in Practice 60 Industry News Get to know a legendary architect whose historic works show 64 Advertising Index concern for “not just how a building meets the sky but how it meets the ground.” Cobb was awarded the 2008 BSI Bybee Prize for a career of excellence in the use of natural stone. BSI Tucker Design Award Winners 16 Ridge House Artful Design Written in Stone On the Cover: Designer: Bohlin Cywinski Jackson, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. West Texas Hadrian limestone is the primary material used on the 2008 BSI 20 Campbell Cliffs Tucker Design Award-winning George A. Using Stone to Blend Old and New Purefoy Municipal Center in Frisco, Texas. The winning project team features Designer: Line and Space LLC, Tucson, Ariz. Building Stone Institute members Holzman Moss Architecture, 24 Glencoe Dee Brown Inc., Cold Spring Granite and TexaStone Quarries. Showcasing Stone’s Grandeur Designer: Liederbach & Graham, Architects, Chicago 2 BUILDING STONE MAGAZINE Fall 2008 www.buildingstonemagazine.com BSI FullPage Template 9/9/08 4:45 PM Page 1 BSI3103_Fall08 9/16/08 11:03 AM Page 4 Features 28 Opus 22 Rising from the Ground Designer: Marpa Design Studio, Boulder, Colo.
    [Show full text]
  • Save Outdoor Sculpture!
    Save Outdoor Sculpture! . A Survey of Sculpture in Vtrginia Compiled by Sarah Shields Driggs with John L. Orrock J ' Save Outdoor Sculpture! A Survey of Sculpture in Virginia Compiled by Sarah Shields Driggs with John L. Orrock SAVE OUTDOOR SCULPTURE Table of Contents Virginia Save Outdoor Sculpture! by Sarah Shields Driggs . I Confederate Monuments by Gaines M Foster . 3 An Embarrassment of Riches: Virginia's Sculpture by Richard Guy Wilson . 5 Why Adopt A Monument? by Richard K Kneipper . 7 List of Sculpture in Vrrginia . 9 List ofVolunteers . 35 Copyright Vuginia Department of Historic Resources Richmond, Vrrginia 1996 Save Outdoor Sculpture!, was designed and SOS! is a project of the National Museum of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, and the National prepared for publication by Grace Ng Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Property. SOS! is supported by major contributions from Office of Graphic Communications the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Getty Grant Program and the Henry Luce Foundation. Additional assis­ Virginia Department of General Services tance has been provided by the National Endowment for the Arts, Ogilvy Adams & Rinehart, Inc., TimeWarner Inc., the Contributing Membership of the Smithsonian National Associates Program and Cover illustration: ''Ligne Indeterminee'~ Norfolk. Members of its Board, as well as many other concerned individuals. (Photo by David Ha=rd) items like lawn ornaments or commercial signs, formed around the state, but more are needed. and museum collections, since curators would be By the fall of 1995, survey reports were Virginia SOS! expected to survey their own holdings. pouring in, and the results were engrossing. Not The definition was thoroughly analyzed at only were our tastes and priorities as a Common­ by Sarah Shields Driggs the workshops, but gradually the DHR staff wealth being examined, but each individual sur­ reached the conclusion that it was best to allow veyor's forms were telling us what they had dis~ volunteers to survey whatever caught their eye.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval War of 1812: a Documentary History
    The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume III 1814–1815 Chesapeake Bay, Northern Lakes, and Pacific Ocean Part 6 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 2002 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 706 NORTHERN LAKES THEATER only to compleat the Vessels now upon the Lakes but with a View to any emer­ gency which may make it needful to en crease the number of our Ships. This outline of my Intentions will meet I hope, your Excellency's wishes and be Satisfactory: Should it appear defective, in any point or should Your Excel­ lency think any alteration necessary, I shall be most happy in receiving any sug­ Chapter Three gestions with which you may have the goodness to favor me who have the honor to be Sir Your Excellency's most obedient humble servant The Pacific Theater: EWCROwen January 1814-August 1815 Commodore Commr. in Chief LS, CaOOA, British Military and Naval Records, RG8, I, "C" Ser., Vol. 735, pp. In December 1813 as David Porter prepared his frigate to leave the Marque­ 8-17. san island of Nuku Hiva, he could reflect on a year of memorable accomplish­ ment and extreme good fortune. Ten months earlier he had made the bold deci­ sion to enter the Pacific and cruise singly against British merchant shipping off the coasts of Chile, Peru, and Mexico. In March he arrived at the Chilean port of Valparaiso where he was greeted enthusiastically by a people in the midst of their own revolutionary struggle for independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration
    National Park Service U.S Department of the Interior Washington Support Office: Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Interpretation, Education and Volunteers Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration Summary Report DEDICATION This report honors all those who suffered and died in this nation’s struggles for freedom and equality. It is also dedicated to our colleague, Tim Sinclair, who was taken from us too soon. Timothy D. Sinclair, Sr. (1974-2016) Chief of Interpretation Selma to Montgomery NHT Tuskegee Airmen NHS and Tuskegee Institute NHS You took us on a walk from Selma to Montgomery. To keep your vision and memory alive, “We’re still marching!” Silent sentinels stood watch for 22 hours to commemorate the 22 hours of combat that took place at Spotsylvania’s Bloody Angle. FREDERICKSBURG AND SPOTSYLVANIA NMP Cover Graphic: Courtesy of Chris Barr FOREWORD The Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration has been quite a journey. Thanks to all of you who helped make it a meaningful and memorable one for our country. We hope our efforts have helped Americans understand the connection between these two epic periods of time as a continuous march toward freedom and equality for all–a march that continues still today. Along the way, perhaps the National Park Service learned something about itself, as well. When we first began planning for this commemorative journey, there were several Civil War parks that had difficultly acknowledging slavery as the cause of the war. Both Civil War sites and civil rights sites questioned whether a combined “Civil War to Civil Rights” Commemoration would water down and weaken each.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Guards and Urban Territories in Delhi, India
    Filtering Class through Space : Security Guards and Urban Territories in Delhi, India SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND TO THE FACULTY OF PARIS SORBONNE CITÉ BY DAMIEN CARRIERE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Under the supervision of: VINAY GIDWANI AND VERONIQUE DUPONT DECEMBER 2018 Thèse de doctorat de L’Université du Minnesota et de L’Université Sorbonne Paris Cité Préparée à l’Université Paris Diderot École doctorale 382 : Économies, espaces, sociétés, civilisations : pensée critique, politiques et pratiques sociales Centre d'études en sciences sociales sur les mondes africains, américains et asiatiques (CESSMA) Filtering Class through Space : Security Guards and Urban Territories in Delhi, India Par Damien Carrière Thèse de doctorat de Géographie Dirigée par Véronique Dupont et Vinay Gidwani Présentée et soutenue à Minneapolis le 11 décembre 2018 Présidente du jury : Professeure Nagar Richa, Université du Minnesota Rapporteurs : Professeure Deboulet Agnès, Université Paris 8 Vincennes Saint- Denis Professeur associé Goldman Michael, Université du Minnesota Examinateurs : Professeure associée Morange Marianne, Université Paris 7 Diderot Professeur Braun Bruce, Université du Minnesota Direction : Mme Dupont Véronique, directrice de recherche à l'IRD, CESSMA Université Paris 7 Diderot Professeur Gidwany Vinay K., Université du Minnesota Department of Geography, Environment & Society, University of Minnesota 414 Social Sciences Building 267 19th Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55455 Centre d’Étude en Sciences Sociales sur les Mondes Africains, Américains et Asiatiques, Université Paris Diderot Case courrier 7017 75205 PARIS © 2018 Damien Carrière Damien Carrière – Filtering Class through Space: Security Guards and Urban Territories in Delhi, India – 2018 Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my two advisors, Research Director Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 World Heritage
    4 T rom the vast plains of the Serengeti to historic cities such T 7 as Vienna, Lima and Kyoto; from the prehistoric rock art 1 ICELAND 5 3 on the Iberian Peninsula to the Statue of Liberty; from the 2 8 Kasbah of Algiers to the Imperial Palace in Beijing — all 5 2 of these places, as varied as they are, have one thing in common. FINLAND O 3 All are World Heritage sites of outstanding cultural or natural 3 T 15 6 SWEDEN 13 4 value to humanity and are worthy of protection for future 1 5 1 1 14 T 24 NORWAY 11 2 20 generations to know and enjoy. 2 RUSSIAN 23 NIO M O UN IM D 1 R I 3 4 T A FEDERATION A L T • P 7 • W L 1 O 17 A 2 I 5 ESTONIA 6 R D L D N 7 O 7 H 25 E M R 4 I E 3 T IN AG O 18 E • IM 8 PATR Key LATVIA 6 United Nations World 1 Cultural property The designations employed and the presentation 1 T Educational, Scientific and Heritage of material on this map do not imply the expres- 12 Cultural Organization Convention 1 Natural property 28 T sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 14 10 1 1 22 DENMARK 9 LITHUANIA Mixed property (cultural and natural) 7 3 N UNESCO and National Geographic Society con- G 1 A UNITED 2 2 Transnational property cerning the legal status of any country, territory, 2 6 5 1 30 X BELARUS 1 city or area or of its authoritiess.
    [Show full text]
  • Giles and Phineas Fletcher
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com May This Book is the Gift of Harold R. Walley Professor of English H i from 1925 to 1966 CAMBRIDGE ENGLISH CLASSICS The Poetical Works of Giles Fletcher and Phineas Fletcher In Two Volumes GILES FLETCHER (The Younger) Born, circa I 58 5 Died, 162 3 PHINEAS FLETCHER Born, 1582 Died, 1650 A!)'7; 1 fa'a'né <7 ’ :‘h’A'I’I/élkflr .7 r, ZZZ-21%" > f[rm/2'! k ‘ u’flr j, n/ :yfl‘wpl/Fr 7'14”?! ~ ‘ , V _ ' v “'1' f'Iiae-L 1U; 5 inf/11', [p 1.7/ I / ~ ‘10:: _ . if 1,; 6. A w ff ‘. ~ 4, H WV w; , _ . 7 1:1” 12 wffi’rj" “2"” I???" Q“! ~ 3 .7 CELIA '-' ; m yj ‘ t .'? _', {23,5,“ ‘ Tia/by”, [6t ‘14”,1/1117' #7., ,‘Hl‘bfi fl - ‘ f 7 6, DA ( 1‘ i1,347.,4551 - 0" _!;'fl~7(ff - i \ ~, - "L , “;- if, k I ‘7 t r igl'E/I‘liui'ft’ ' ' . Jhnzaflélfr g § 51/ y!/A'!:‘FLZ;(;r/.'ff v ‘ ,- ‘r I i .7 ~ {at {a an“? I _ ~ iv I a ""‘ w,» “I w: '5 k "~ i "" .i a. ,. .fluhé'w /71(f”{ fit/RI! g‘arfbaf '-r . H _ la 4' U I jQJfigvh 'f/zvflj' a”? 4‘?” fl”! 50/.” . s 27?" 4’; LIA’P'Q" Ezléll/fcr \ Sill“,- vK 642;.»mi'fi} 1.4.1}!- L'JM [10:61 ‘* Z im"QM), “63%”aiéjli-QFAMJIATLW 191'“ mu 51-95”: 4’41”! fwd/fir:qu £51“ 7 37/ _ i “Mg m .¢ Jilu4ki3~‘r £1,1~'/',/;>i"/g,yggyrb( [/7 7%”../ , ‘ éj'f/LJJj/{fgu all: Z Q, 4 .‘ f I I I I r v.
    [Show full text]
  • Place-Making in Late 19Th And
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts TERRITORIAL SELF-FASHIONING: PLACE-MAKING IN LATE 19TH AND EARLY 20TH CENTURY COLONIAL INDIA A Dissertation in History by Aryendra Chakravartty © 2013 Aryendra Chakravartty Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2013 The dissertation of Aryendra Chakravartty was reviewed and approved* by the following: David Atwill Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies Director of Graduate Studies Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee Joan B. Landes Ferree Professor of Early Modern History & Women’s Studies Michael Kulikowski Professor of History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Head, Department of History Madhuri Desai Associate Professor of Art History and Asian Studies Mrinalini Sinha Alice Freeman Palmer Professor of History Special Member University of Michigan, Ann Arbor * Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract My project, Territorial Self-Fashioning: “Place-Making” in Late 19th and Early 20th Century Colonial India, focuses on the province of Bihar and the emergence of a specifically place-based Bihari regional identity. For the provincial literati, emphasizing Bihar as an “organic” entity cultivated a sense of common belonging that was remarkably novel for the period, particularly because it implied that an administrative region had transformed into a cohesive cultural unit. The transformation is particularly revealing because the claims to a “natural” Bihar was not based upon a distinctive language, ethnicity or religion. Instead this regional assertion was partially instigated by British colonial politics and in part shaped by an emergent Indian national imagination. The emergence of a place-based Bihari identity therefore can only be explained by situating it in the context of 19th century colonial politics and nationalist sentiments.
    [Show full text]