DOCSLIB.ORG

ATINER's Conference Paper Series LNG2017-2259

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ATINER's Conference Paper Series LNG2017-2259 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LNG2014-1176 Athens Institute for Education and Research ATINER ATINER's Conference Paper Series LNG2017-2259 The Proof is in the Pronoun: Grammatical and Semantic Gender in Anglo Saxon John M. Ryan Associate Professor of Spanish Linguistics Department of Hispanic Studies University of Northern Colorado USA 1 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LIT2017-2258 An Introduction to ATINER's Conference Paper Series ATINER started to publish this conference papers series in 2012. It includes only the papers submitted for publication after they were presented at one of the conferences organized by our Institute every year. This paper has been peer reviewed by at least two academic members of ATINER. Dr. Gregory T. Papanikos President Athens Institute for Education and Research This paper should be cited as follows: Ryan, J.M. (2017). “The Proof is in the Pronoun: Grammatical and Semantic Gender in Anglo Saxon”, Athens: ATINER'S Conference Paper Series, No: LNG2017-2259. Athens Institute for Education and Research 8 Valaoritou Street, Kolonaki, 10671 Athens, Greece Tel: + 30 210 3634210 Fax: + 30 210 3634209 Email: [email protected] URL: www.atiner.gr URL Conference Papers Series: www.atiner.gr/papers.htm Printed in Athens, Greece by the Athens Institute for Education and Research. All rights reserved. Reproduction is allowed for non-commercial purposes if the source is fully acknowledged. ISSN: 2241-2891 07/09/2017 2 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LIT2017-2258 The Proof is in the Pronoun: Grammatical and Semantic Gender in Anglo Saxon John M. Ryan Associate Professor of Spanish Linguistics Department of Hispanic Studies University of Northern Colorado USA Abstract In the literature on gender systems, anaphoric pronouns are commonly given the proverbial backseat to nouns and even nominal modifiers such as adjectives; however, as this paper will point out, in the case of Old English, the pronominal system played a major role in the development of the gender system that we employ today. Following Curzan (2003), who draws on the Helsinki corpus of Old English texts, this paper will demonstrate how the pronominal gender system in Old English, like its Modern counterpart today, might very well serve as a window to the mind of the Old English speaker and what s/he perceived as "natural" gender. I will show how the pronominal gender system of Old English has in actuality evolved very little into Modern English. I will argue that in Old English for nouns there were two very distinct gender systems: 1) grammatical (e.g., wif [neuter] "woman"); and 2) semantic (or "natural") (e.g., modor [feminine] "mother"), that operated simultaneously. For Old English pronouns, however, I suggest a more complex gender system than for nouns, one that: 1) preferred/selected "natural" gender pronouns for human or human-like referents despite the grammatical gender of the referent; and 2) preferred/selected grammatical gender for non-human or inanimate referents throughout the Old English period, ultimately gravitating toward overall preference for natural, or semantic, gender by the early Middle English period. I will term this system pronominal complexity and show how this has major implications on how natural gender in Modern English evolved. Keywords: Diachronic linguistics, Gender, Old English, Pronouns Acknowledgments: The author wishes to thank the University of Northern Colorado for a 2017 Provost Travel Award so that he could present a portion of this paper at the 10th Annual International Conference on Languages and Linguistics in Athens, Greece. 3 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LIT2017-2258 Introduction Languages that sprout from the Indo-European family tree have descended into modern times with differing arrangements of gender or noun classes1. Some have retained all three Late Proto-Indo-European (LPIE) grammatical genders of masculine, feminine, and neuter. Others, for varying reasons, have lost one of the three. Still other languages, like Modern English (and the reason for this paper), have lost all their historical affiliation with grammatical gender in nouns and assumed a "natural" interpretation of gender as evidenced when they appear with corresponding anaphoric pronouns2, as exemplified in (1) through (3): 1. John (masculine referent) bought his (masculine anaphoric pronoun) car in Florida. 2. Mary (feminine referent) bought her (feminine anaphoric pronoun) car in Philadelphia. 3. John bought a car (neuter referent) and lent it (neuter anaphoric pronoun) to Mary. This paper has four goals: 1) to provide a typological framework for gender systems across multiple languages, starting with a comparison among languages overall, to be followed by a study of the Indo-European languages, and finishing specifically with the Germanic languages; 2) to investigate the historical shift from grammatical to natural gender in English, in both nouns and pronouns; 3) to argue for a similarity between the gender systems of Early Proto-Indo-European and Modern English with regards to semantic "transparency"; and 4) to conclude with a summary of findings and to suggest whether certain gender shifts that have happened diachronically across languages have been either semantically or socially motivated, or both. Most importantly, in terms of gender in Old English, this paper will argue how consideration of the pronominal gender system of Old English, like its Modern counterpart today, is necessary to the overall picture of gender and might very well serve as a window to the mind of the Old English speaker and what s/he perceived as "natural" gender. 1 In this paper it is important to distinguish between the terms "gender" and "noun class". Gender distinctions have some basis, either natural or arbitrary, on sex; and 2) Noun class distinctions have no basis whatsoever on sex. As Matasovic (2004) points out, noun class systems across world languages have been found to be based on other such concepts as animacy, shape, etc. This dichotomy allows us to specify systems in languages that possess large numbers of noun classes. 2 Exceptions to this generality are few (e.g., anaphoric "she" referring to ships, machines, and countries, and, as Matasovic points out, "he" or "she" referring to pets, although in my opinion this does not break the natural gender rule because this use does indeed correspond to the natural sex of the particular pet). 4 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LIT2017-2258 Typology and Work on Gender Systems Typology According to Gender Linguists have always been interested in gender as a grammatical category since the earliest days of inquiry, having first been treated by the Greeks such as Pythagoras3, Aristotle, and Dionysius Thrax. The past thirty years have witnessed more comparative studies of gender systems across languages. Undoubtedly, the two most important and exhaustive of these are the pioneering work of Corbett (1991) and more recently, Matasovic (2004). Corbett’s treatment of gender is a seminal work from a typological standpoint. In his work, Corbett both: 1) defines gender for purposes of typological comparison; and 2) establishes five (5) typological parameters that can be used to compare gender systems across languages. According to Corbett, gender is unlike other grammatical categories such as case or number that can vary according to the particular need of the speaker or affect the meaning of the noun in some way. Corbett defines gender as a unique grammatical category, again unlike case or number, that has to be specified in a person’s lexicon, either by general assignment principles or individually for specific nouns. Corbett further explains that one can spot gender systems in languages where nouns tend to have the following two properties: 1) nominal classification—whereby nouns of a language typically belong to a closed set of noun classes; and 2) agreement—whereby the gender of the noun determines the form that other words take in the sentence, thereby forming some kind of syntactic unit. Corbett goes on to explain that some languages have gender and others do not. He further specifies that for all languages having gender systems there exists a semantic core of nouns for which gender can be predicted solely from meaning. All other nouns of a given language, for which gender cannot be predicted from meaning alone, are considered part of the semantic residue. Languages differ widely as to the extent to which nouns belong to the semantic core or the semantic residue. Some languages, such as the Dravidian languages, have all their nouns exclusively within the semantic core so in every case gender can be predicted by meaning. Other languages for the most part do not work this way, and their nouns are divided in some ratio between the core and residue. According to Corbett, another important concept related to the notion of semantic core and residue is that of gender assignment, whether on a semantic basis for nouns in the core, or formally (morphologically or phonologically) for nouns in the residue. In other words, the gender of nouns in the semantic core can be predicted, as we have already seen, on the basis of meaning, whereas the gender of those in the residue can be predicted to the noun class or declension they belong to. Of course, there are always exceptions where nouns 3 Pythagoras was the first to classify nouns according to notions of gender. 5 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LIT2017-2258 may be formally declined according to a specific class and have a gender atypical of that class. Drawing on both Corbett and Matasovic, Table 1 provides five typological parameters to help compare gender systems across languages: Table 1. Typological Parameters for Gender Systems Source: Corbett 1991, Matasovic 2004. These parameters provide some tools that can help to make typological assessments regarding gender about any language. Gender around the World Perhaps the most basic task of a typological review of language gender systems is an overall distinction between languages or language families as to whether those languages have gender or not.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantifying the Semantic Core of Gender Systems
    Quantifying the Semantic Core of Gender Systems Adina Williams@ Ryan CotterellS,H Lawrence Wolf-SonkinS Damian´ BlasiP Hanna WallachZ @ Facebook AI Research, New York, USA SDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA HDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK PComparative Linguistics Department, University of Zurich,¨ Switzerland ZMicrosoft Research, New York City, USA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Abstract portion of the lexicon where this relationship is clear usually consists of animate nouns; nouns Many of the world’s languages employ gram- referring to people morphologically reflect the matical gender on the lexeme. For example, sociocultural notion of “natural genders.” This por- in Spanish, the word for house (casa) is feminine, whereas the word for paper (papel) tion of the lexicon—the “semantic core”—seems is masculine. To a speaker of a genderless to be present in all gendered languages (Aksenov, language, this assignment seems to exist 1984; Corbett, 1991). But how many inanimate with neither rhyme nor reason. But is the nouns can also be included in the semantic core? assignment of inanimate nouns to grammatical Answering this question requires investigating genders truly arbitrary? We present the first whether there is a correlation between grammatical large-scale investigation of the arbitrariness gender and lexical semantics for inanimate nouns. of noun–gender assignments. To that end, we use canonical correlation analysis to correlate Our primary technical contribution is demon- the grammatical gender of inanimate nouns strating that grammatical gender and lexical with an externally grounded definition of their semantics can be correlated using canonical lexical semantics.
    [Show full text]
  • TIWARI-DISSERTATION-2014.Pdf
    Copyright by Bhavya Tiwari 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Bhavya Tiwari Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Beyond English: Translating Modernism in the Global South Committee: Elizabeth Richmond-Garza, Supervisor David Damrosch Martha Ann Selby Cesar Salgado Hannah Wojciehowski Beyond English: Translating Modernism in the Global South by Bhavya Tiwari, M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2014 Dedication ~ For my mother ~ Acknowledgements Nothing is ever accomplished alone. This project would not have been possible without the organic support of my committee. I am specifically thankful to my supervisor, Elizabeth Richmond-Garza, for giving me the freedom to explore ideas at my own pace, and for reminding me to pause when my thoughts would become restless. A pause is as important as movement in the journey of a thought. I am thankful to Martha Ann Selby for suggesting me to subhead sections in the dissertation. What a world of difference subheadings make! I am grateful for all the conversations I had with Cesar Salgado in our classes on Transcolonial Joyce, Literary Theory, and beyond. I am also very thankful to Michael Johnson and Hannah Chapelle Wojciehowski for patiently listening to me in Boston and Austin over luncheons and dinners respectively. I am forever indebted to David Damrosch for continuing to read all my drafts since February 2007. I am very glad that our paths crossed in Kali’s Kolkata.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex, Language, and Financial Inclusion
    BOFIT Discussion Papers 9 • 2020 Francis Osei-Tutu and Laurent Weill Sex, language, and financial inclusion BOFIT Discussion Papers Editor-in-Chief Zuzana Fungáčová BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/2020 1.4.2020 Francis Osei-Tutu and Laurent Weill: Sex, language, and financial inclusion ISBN 978-952-323-321-8, online ISSN 1456-5889, online The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bank of Finland. Suomen Pankki Helsinki 2020 BOFIT- Institute for Economies in Transition BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/2020 Bank of Finland Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2 Background ........................................................................................................................... 7 3 Data and methodology ........................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Measuring financial inclusion ...................................................................................... 10 3.2 Measuring gender marking in languages...................................................................... 11 3.3 Methodology ................................................................................................................ 13 4 Results ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Across Languages: the Linguistic Representation of Women and Men
    <DOCINFO AUTHOR "" TITLE "Gender Across Languages: The linguistic representation of women and men. Volume II" SUBJECT "Impact 10" KEYWORDS "" SIZE HEIGHT "220" WIDTH "150" VOFFSET "4"> Gender Across Languages Impact: Studies in language and society impact publishes monographs, collective volumes, and text books on topics in sociolinguistics. The scope of the series is broad, with special emphasis on areas such as language planning and language policies; language conflict and language death; language standards and language change; dialectology; diglossia; discourse studies; language and social identity (gender, ethnicity, class, ideology); and history and methods of sociolinguistics. General editor Annick De Houwer University of Antwerp Advisory board Ulrich Ammon William Labov Gerhard Mercator University University of Pennsylvania Laurie Bauer Elizabeth Lanza Victoria University of Wellington University of Oslo Jan Blommaert Joseph Lo Bianco Ghent University The Australian National University Paul Drew Peter Nelde University of York Catholic University Brussels Anna Escobar Dennis Preston University of Illinois at Urbana Michigan State University Guus Extra Jeanine Treffers-Daller Tilburg University University of the West of England Margarita Hidalgo Vic Webb San Diego State University University of Pretoria Richard A. Hudson University College London Volume 10 Gender Across Languages: The linguistic representation of women and men Volume II Edited by Marlis Hellinger and Hadumod Bußmann Gender Across Languages The linguistic representation of women and men volume 2 Edited by Marlis Hellinger University of Frankfurt am Main Hadumod Bußmann University of Munich John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American 8 National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcements
    227 Journal of Language Contact – THEMA 1 (2007): Contact: Framing its Theories and Descriptions ANNOUNCEMENTS Symposium Language Contact and the Dynamics of Language: Theory and Implications 10-13 May 2007 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (Leipzig) Organizing institutions: Institut Universitaire de France : Chaire ‘Dynamique du langage et contact des langues’ (Nice) Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology: Department of Linguistics (Leipzig) Information and presentation: http://www.unice.fr/ChaireIUF-Nicolai/Symposium/Index_Symposium.html Thematic orientation Three themes are chosen. I. “‘Contact’: an ‘obvious fact ? A notion to be rethought?” The aim is to open theoretical reflection on the importance of ‘contact’ as a linguistic and anthropological phenomenon for the study of the evolution and dynamics of languages and of Language. II. “Contact, typology and evolution of languages: a perspective to be explored” Here the aim is to open discussion on what is constructed by ‘typology’. III. “Representation of the phenomena and the role of descriptors: a perspective to be established” In connection with the double requirement of theoretical reflection and empirical underpinning, the aim is to develop an epistemological reflection on the elaboration of knowledge in the domain of languages and Language. Titles of communications Peter Bakker (Aarhus) Rethinking structural diffusion Cécile Canut (Montpelllier) & Paroles et Agencements Jean-Marie Prieur (Montpelllier) Bernard Comrie (MPI-EVA, Leipzig & WALS tell us about the diffusion of structural features Santa Barbara) Nick Enfield (MPI, Nijmegen) Conceptual tools for a natural science of language (contact and change) Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (Boulder, Language-internal versus contact-induced change: the case of split Colorado) coding of person and number.
    [Show full text]
  • Generative Second Language Acquisition
    SLABAKOVA ET AL. SLABAKOVA Most human beings grow up speaking more than one language; a lot of us also acquire an additional language or languages other than our mother tongue. This Element in the Second Language Acquisition series investigates the human capacity to learn additional languages later in life and introduces the seminal processes involved in this acquisition. The authors Second Language discuss how to analyze learner data and what the findings tell us about language learning; critically assessing a leading Acquisition theory of how adults learn a second language: Generative SLA. This theory describes both universal innate knowledge and individual experiences as crucial for language acquisition. This Element makes the relevant connections between first Second Language Acquisition Generative and second language acquisition and explores whether they are fundamentally similar processes. Slabakova et al. provide Generative fascinating pedagogical questions that encourage students and teachers to reflect upon the experiences of second language learners. Second Language Acquisition About the Series Series Editors Second Language Acquisition showcases Alessandro Benati a high-quality set of updatable, concise The University of works that address how learners come to Hong Kong internalize the linguistic system of another John W. Schwieter Roumyana Slabakova, language and how they make use of that Wilfrid Laurier linguistic system. Contributions reflect the University, Ontario interdisciplinary nature of the field, drawing Tania Leal, on theories, hypotheses, and frameworks from education, linguistics, psychology, Amber Dudley and and neurology, among other disciplines. Micah Stack Cover image: Giovanni Cancemi / Shutterstock Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 95.115.93.183, on 01 Oct 2020 at 09:20:50, subject to theISSN Cambridge 2517-7974 Core (online) terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
    [Show full text]
  • With Special Reference to Gender-Marking Avoidance Strategies)
    Linguistics Armenian Folia Anglistika Insights into the Category of Gender (with special reference to gender-marking avoidance strategies) Lili Karapetyan, Lusine Danukhyan Yerevan State University Abstract Gender is an issue that has long preoccupied linguists, and the category of gender is one of the still unsolved puzzles of linguistic science. There has never been a complete agreement between scientists with regard to gender origin, nor there is unanimity of opinion as to its function in different language systems and, in general, to its definition. The present study focuses on the origin and historical development of the category of gender, classification of languages according to gender types, the peculiarities of gendered and genderless languages, gender-marking avoidance strategies. Through the comparative method of analysis English and Armenian gender systems are compared with an aim to reveal the similarities and differences in terms of functions, gender indicators in proverbs, as well as types of reference. Key words: category of gender, gender systems, gendered and genderless languages, gender-marking avoidance strategies. Introduction The word gender has been used since the 14th century as a grammatical term, referring to classes of noun as masculine, feminine, or neuter groups. Grammatical gender is a formal category, but it does not refer to the biological difference between man and woman; rather it is an integral part of the linguistic system and it also includes inanimate entities. This system is used in approximately one quarter of the world’s languages. In 257 languages from different geographical areas and linguistic families, 112 are shown to have a gender system (Oxford Research Encyclopedia).
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Drafting in Genderless Language: Is Gender-Neutral Drafting Relevant?
    Legislative Drafting in Genderless Language: Is Gender-neutral Drafting Relevant? Ekawestri Prajwalita Widiati and Dwi Rahayu Kristianti Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia Keywords: Gender, neutral language, legal drafting, plain language. Abstract: The technique of Gender-neutral drafting has been introduced in many jurisdictions that use English language to draft legislation aiming to alter the use of masculine pronouns. As commonly known, some languages are categorized as gendered language namely, French, Deutsche, Arabic and English often encounter challenges in formulating a non-sexist legislative sentences. This is not to say that the use of sexist language always results in discrimination on one gender. Thus, using of gender-neutral language is actually a tool to produce clarity which in turn should contribute to an effectiveness. For an inherently gender-neutral language such as Bahasa Indonesia, gender-neutral drafting is a new concept because technically a genderless language is unlikely to produce a sexist norm. In fact, there are cases where numbers of local legislations has resulted in discrimination against women. This article underline that gender-neutral drafting for a genderless language is relevant as concept that is applied in the research paper accompanying a draft bill to produce a more gender- responsive content and analysis. Gender-neutral drafting is a response to gender equality demands. Therefore, the drafter and policy maker should not entrapped in the use of terminology an-sich but taking into account the higher value to achieve by drafting legislation that is effectiveness. Furthermore, gender-neutral drafting approach is the earliest stage towards the concept of gender aware legislation that looking at equality as results or equality on the facts not merely a technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Skin, Kin and Clan: the Dynamics of Social Categories in Indigenous
    Skin, Kin and Clan THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CATEGORIES IN INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIA Skin, Kin and Clan THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CATEGORIES IN INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIA EDITED BY PATRICK MCCONVELL, PIERS KELLY AND SÉBASTIEN LACRAMPE Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au A catalogue record for this book is available from the National Library of Australia ISBN(s): 9781760461638 (print) 9781760461645 (eBook) This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image Gija Kinship by Shirley Purdie. This edition © 2018 ANU Press Contents List of Figures . vii List of Tables . xi About the Cover . xv Contributors . xvii 1 . Introduction: Revisiting Aboriginal Social Organisation . 1 Patrick McConvell 2 . Evolving Perspectives on Aboriginal Social Organisation: From Mutual Misrecognition to the Kinship Renaissance . 21 Piers Kelly and Patrick McConvell PART I People and Place 3 . Systems in Geography or Geography of Systems? Attempts to Represent Spatial Distributions of Australian Social Organisation . .43 Laurent Dousset 4 . The Sources of Confusion over Social and Territorial Organisation in Western Victoria . .. 85 Raymond Madden 5 . Disputation, Kinship and Land Tenure in Western Arnhem Land . 107 Mark Harvey PART II Social Categories and Their History 6 . Moiety Names in South-Eastern Australia: Distribution and Reconstructed History . 139 Harold Koch, Luise Hercus and Piers Kelly 7 .
    [Show full text]
  • A Dictionary of Linguistics
    MID-CENTURY REFERENCE LIBRARY DAGOBERT D. RUNES, Ph.D., General Editor AVAILABLE Dictionary of Ancient History Dictionary of the Arts Dictionary of European History Dictionary of Foreign Words and Phrases Dictionary of Linguistics Dictionary of Mysticism Dictionary of Mythology Dictionary of Philosophy Dictionary of Psychoanalysis Dictionary of Science and Technology Dictionary of Sociology Dictionary of Word Origins Dictionary of World Literature Encyclopedia of Aberrations Encyclopedia of the Arts Encyclopedia of Atomic Energy Encyclopedia of Criminology Encyclopedia of Literature Encyclopedia of Psychology Encyclopedia of Religion Encyclopedia of Substitutes and Synthetics Encyclopedia of Vocational Guidance Illustrated Technical Dictionary Labor Dictionary Liberal Arts Dictionary Military and Naval Dictionary New Dictionary of American History New Dictionary of Psychology Protestant Dictionary Slavonic Encyclopedia Theatre Dictionary Tobacco Dictionary FORTHCOMING Beethoven Encyclopedia Dictionary of American Folklore Dictionary of American Grammar and Usage Dictionary of American Literature Dictionary of American Maxims Dictionary of American Proverbs Dictionary of American Superstitions Dictionary of American Synonyms Dictionary of Anthropology Dictionary of Arts and Crafts Dictionary of Asiatic History Dictionary of Astronomy Dictionary of Child Guidance Dictionary of Christian Antiquity Dictionary of Discoveries and Inventions Dictionary of Etiquette Dictionary of Forgotten Words Dictionary of French Literature Dictionary of Geography
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Grammatical Gender and Non-Native Acquisition
    Loss of grammatical gender and non-native acquisition Iván Igartua University of the Basque Country Workshop “Grammatical hibridization and social conditions” Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology 16−18 October, 2014 Outline 1. Loss of genders vs. loss of gender. 2. Internal and external perspectives on gender loss. 3. Two case studies: Cappadocian Greek and Ossetic. 4. Historical data on language contact. 5. Signs of adult second-language learning. 6. Conclusions. Loss of genders vs. loss of gender Gender reduction/reorganization: From 3 to 2 members: Lithuanian, Latvian, Swedish, Danish, Spanish and other Romance languages, Pashto and other Iranian languages, Russian dialects, the Sele Fara dialect of Slovene (Priestly 1983, Matasović 2004). Complete loss of gender: Elimination of the category, as in Armenian, Persian, Ossetic, Assamese, Bengali, English. The rise and fall of genders Processes traditionally viewed in an internal perspective (Fodor 1959, Ibrahim 1973, Greenberg 1978, Corbett 1991) Rise: Grammaticalization and morphologization processes leading from e.g.classifiers or classifying demonstratives through articles to gender / agreement affixes. From differential object marking in an animacy-based system (as in PIE, cf. Luraghi 2011). Loss: Phonetic attrition of formal markers leading to reduction of genders and eventually their complete elimination. Overall stability of gender Despite its mostly arbitrary character (except i.a. for semantically based systems) and its alleged lack of functionality, gender is diachronically quite a stable category. Gender is “un luxe linguistique sans relation avec la logique” (Bally 1926: 45). “linguists designate gender as a secondary grammatical category since it is not vital for the proper functioning of any language” (Ibrahim 1973: 24).
    [Show full text]
  • Can Gender-Fair Language Reduce Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination?
    REVIEW published: 02 February 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025 Can Gender-Fair Language Reduce Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination? Sabine Sczesny*, Magda Formanowicz and Franziska Moser Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Gender-fair language (GFL) aims at reducing gender stereotyping and discrimination. Two principle strategies have been employed to make languages gender-fair and to treat women and men symmetrically: neutralization and feminization. Neutralization is achieved, for example, by replacing male-masculine forms (policeman)withgender- unmarked forms (police officer), whereas feminization relies on the use of feminine forms to make female referents visible (i.e., the applicant... he or she instead of the applicant... he). By integrating research on (1) language structures, (2) language policies, and (3) individual language behavior, we provide a critical review of how GFL contributes to the Edited by: reduction of gender stereotyping and discrimination. Our review provides a basis for Manuel Carreiras, future research and for scientifically based policy-making. Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Spain Keywords: gender stereotypes, gender-fair language, social discrimination, gender equality, social change Reviewed by: Simona Mancini, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain Linguistic gender asymmetries are ubiquitous, as documented in the contributions in Hellinger and and Language, Spain Bußmann (2001, 2002, 2003), which analyze 30 languages (e.g., Arabic, Chinese, English, Finnish, Juan I. Aragones, | downloaded: 13.3.2017 Hindi, Turkish, Swahili) from various language families. An almost universal and fundamental Universidad Complutense de Madrid, asymmetry lies in the use of masculine generics. In English, for example, generic he can be used Spain when gender is irrelevant (e.g., the user..
    [Show full text]