DOCSLIB.ORG

New PPGIS Research Identifies Landscape Values and Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New PPGIS Research Identifies Landscape Values and Development Mapping Community Landscape Values and Development Preferences in and around Darwin Harbour Tom D. Brewera,b, Michael M. Douglasc a Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, 0909, Australia ([email protected]). b Australian Institute of Marine Science, Arafura Timor Research Facility, 23 Ellengowan Dr., Brinkin, Northern Territory, 0810, Australia. a Research Institute of Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, 0909, Australia. Background Results Darwin Harbour is a highly val- Development Preferences ued and contested place; the A total of 647 development ‘Jewel in the Crown’ of the preference sticker dots were Northern Territory. placed on the supplied maps by 80 respondents. The catchment is currently ex- periencing significant develop- ‘No development’ was, by far, ment and further industrial and the highest scoring develop- tourism development is ex- ment preference (Figure 7). pected, as outlined in the cur- rent draft Regional Land Use Plan1 (Figure 1) tabled by the Northern Territory Planning Figure 1. Darwin Harbour sec- Figure 7. Average scores (of a possi- tion of the development plan ble 100) for each of the development Commission. overview map1 Results preferences. Landscape Values Despite its obvious iconic value and significant use by locals Preference for industrial and visitors alike, there is no representative baseline data on To date 136 surveys have been returned from the mail-out question- development is clustered what the residents living within the catchment most value in naire to 2000 homes. Preliminary data entry and analysis for spatial around Palmerston and and around Darwin Harbour. landscape values and development preferences has been conduct- East Arm (Figure 8). ed on 80 of these 136 returned 2 surveys. A total of 2519 land- High quality spatial data on landscape values (e.g. economic, scape value sticker dots were Preference for residential biodiversity, wilderness), and development preferences (e.g. placed on the 80 supplied and tourism development industrial, residential) will aid future development planning maps. appears spatially correlate that considers the diversity of values and preferences held by d around Palmerston, Dar the community. win City and Mandorah Recreation, Aesthetic, Biodiver- (Figure B). sity, and Wilderness values Aim were the highest scoring land- scape values (Figure 4). Figure 4. Average scores (of a possible Figure 8. Distribution of development preferences from 80 respondents. To identify what Darwin Harbour catchment residents most 100) for each of the landscape values. value in and around Darwin Harbour and to identify where Aggregated landscape values show high- the residents would like to see particular types of develop- est density around the most populated ment occurring, or not. parts of the harbour (Figure 5). Future Directions Individually, landscape values show Data collection Methods marked differences in their spatial distribu- Preliminary results suggest that respondents do not reflect tion throughout the harbour and along the the general population. The majority are older professionals A mail survey was sent to 2000 randomly selected house- foreshore (Figure 6). Some values are rel- that have lived in the region for at least 20 years. holds from within the Darwin Harbour Catchment. The survey atively clustered (e.g. economic value), Further purposive sampling will occur with sectors of the included questions on the households’ links to Darwin Har- whilst others are more dispersed (e.g. community that have not been well represented in the data, bour, a mapping exercise to identify the households’ land- wilderness value). Figure 5. Distribution of all (summed) landscape values. including younger people and Larrakia people. A total sample scape values and development preferences, and questions size of ~ 300 people from within the Darwin Harbour catch- on respondent background (socio-demographics). ment is the current goal. The mapping exercise required respondents to place stickers Analysis relating to landscape values and development preferences Landscape values and development preference data will be (Figure 2) on a map of the harbour and foreshore (Figure 3). analysed for spatial correlation and spatial clustering to deter- 50 20 10 10 5 5 mine potential synergies and conflicts. Points Points Points Points Points Points Darwin Harbour and foreshore mapping exercise (a) Aesthetic/scenic value – I value these places for their 50a 20a 10a 10a 5a 5a attractive scenery, sights, smells, or sounds. Landscape Data collected in the survey, on respondent sociodemo- 50e 20e 10e 10e 5e 5e (e) Economic value – I value these places for economic benefits values such as tourism, industry, services, or other commercial activity. graphics and respondent links to Darwin Harbour, will be 50r 20r 10r 10r 5r 5r (r) Recreation value – I value these places because they provide outdoor recreation activities. used to explain respondent landscape values and develop- 50L 20L 10L 10L 5L 5L (L) Life sustaining value – I value these places because they help produce, preserve, and renew air, soil, and water. (k) Learning value (knowledge) – I value these places because we can use them to learn about 50k 20k 10k 10k 5k 5k ment preferences. This will answer the question of what the environment. 50b 20b 10b 10b 5b 5b (b) Biological diversity value – I value these places because they provide for a variety of plants, wildlife, marine life, or other living organisms. types of people value what, where, and what types of people 50s 20s 10s 10s 5s 5s (s) Spiritual value – I value these places because they are spiritually special to me. have certain development preferences. 50i 20i 10i 10i 5i 5i (i) Intrinsic value – I value these places for their own sake, no matter what I or others think about them or whether they are actually used. 50h 20h 10h 10h 5h 5h (h) Heritage value – I value these places because they have natural and human history. 50f 20f 10f 10f 5f 5f (f) Future value – I value these places because they allow future generations to know and experience them as they are now. Further Research 50t 20t 10t 10t 5t 5t (t) Therapeutic value – I value these places because they make people feel better, physically and/or mentally. I value these places because they are wild. 50w 20w 10w 10w 5w 5w (w) Wilderness value – Parts of the harbour and foreshore that are identified as high- (nd) No development – Use these dots to identify areas where you nd nd nd nd nd nd Development ly valued (hotspots) will become the focus of future research think any future development should be permanently prohibited. preferences rd rd rd rd rd rd (rd) Remove development – Use these dots to identify areas where you think existing development should be removed permanently. into predicting threats to landscape values. The aim of this fu- Rd Rd Rd Rd Rd Rd (Rd) Residential development – Use these dots to identify where you think residential development could conditionally occur with a good plan. ture research is to improve future harbour management. Td Td Td Td Td Td (Td) Tourism development – Use these dots to identify where you think tourism development (e.g. accommodation and tourist attractions) could conditionally occur with a good plan. Id Id Id Id Id Id (Id) Industrial development – Use these dots to identify where you think industrial development (e.g. port facilities, agriculture, energy infrastructure) could occur with a good plan. Figure 2. Sticker sheet used in survey to allow households to identify landscape values and development preferences. Stickers are yellow dots. Surveys were returned, maps were scanned and georeferenced, and Acknowledgements spatial landscape values and devel- This project is primarily funded by the Northern Futures Col- opment preferences entered into laborative Research Network (CRN). QGIS. Thank you to Charlotte Klempin for your help preparing the Figure 3. Map of Darwin Harbour and foreshore survey and entering survey data. showing landscape value and development pref- erence stickers placed by a survey respondent. Thank you to Arafura Timor Research Facility (AIMS) staff for assisting with the survey mail-out. Thank you to the people living in the catchment who took the time to com- References plete the survey. 1 Anonymous. 2014. Draft Darwin Regional Land Use Plan. Northern Territory Planning Com- mission. Thank you to City of Darwin for 2 Brown, G. 2006. Mapping Landscape Values and Development Preferences: a method for project support. Tourism and Residential Development Planning. Int. Journal of Tourism Research, 8: 101-113 Figure 6. Individual landscape value spatial distributions. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anastasia Bauer the Use of Signing Space in a Shared Signing Language of Australia Sign Language Typology 5
    Anastasia Bauer The Use of Signing Space in a Shared Signing Language of Australia Sign Language Typology 5 Editors Marie Coppola Onno Crasborn Ulrike Zeshan Editorial board Sam Lutalo-Kiingi Irit Meir Ronice Müller de Quadros Roland Pfau Adam Schembri Gladys Tang Erin Wilkinson Jun Hui Yang De Gruyter Mouton · Ishara Press The Use of Signing Space in a Shared Sign Language of Australia by Anastasia Bauer De Gruyter Mouton · Ishara Press ISBN 978-1-61451-733-7 e-ISBN 978-1-61451-547-0 ISSN 2192-5186 e-ISSN 2192-5194 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. ” 2014 Walter de Gruyter, Inc., Boston/Berlin and Ishara Press, Lancaster, United Kingdom Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck Țȍ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Acknowledgements This book is the revised and edited version of my doctoral dissertation that I defended at the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Cologne, Germany in January 2013. It is the result of many experiences I have encoun- tered from dozens of remarkable individuals who I wish to acknowledge. First of all, this study would have been simply impossible without its partici- pants. The data that form the basis of this book I owe entirely to my Yolngu family who taught me with patience and care about this wonderful Yolngu language.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Potential Impacts and Mitigation – Water Quality
    5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION – WATER QUALITY The approach adopted for this study to evaluate potential water quality impacts associated with the proposed discharge relied on the application and interpretation of calibrated far-field, two-dimensional hydrodynamic (HD) and advection dispersion (AD) modelling tool built using MIKE21. This modelling was supported, guided and informed by a range of data and other relevant information. These data, the work conducted, and key findings are presented below. 5.1 Numerical Modelling Numerical modelling was used to simulate the transport, dilution and dispersion of the proposed discharge at Gunn Point and surrounding waters. The proposed discharge was modelled (see Appendix A) as a conservative tracer. This allows the dilution and dispersion of the effluent to be understood. The numerical modelling, and therefore the modelled tracer concentrations, can be considered conservative for the following reasons: Biological and physical processes such as the deposition of particulate material or the take up of bioavailable nutrients or absorption by sediments and algal mats (microphytobenthos) growing on the sediments of the significant intertidal areas in and around Shoal Bay are not included in the modelling. Three-dimensional turbulent dispersion associated with wave action has not been included in the modelling. Because the model was very computationally demanding, all scenarios were undertaken in 2D. However, during the model calibration and sensitivity testing, 3D simulations were carried out to confirm the mixing processes were resolved appropriately. The strong tidal currents and shallow water mean the site is well mixed, and the 3D modelling did not provide significantly different results. 5.1.1 Simulation Scenarios The model was run for two separate years: June 2005 – May 2006 inclusive May 2016 to April 2016 inclusive Whilst tropical conditions are highly variable, 2005-2006 was considered a ‘typical’ wet season, and 2016- 2017 a season with higher than average rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • (LGANT) Annual General Meeting Has Elected a New Leadership Team for the Next Two Years That Includes
    View this email in your browser The Local Government Association of the Northern Territory (LGANT) Annual General Meeting has elected a new leadership team for the next two years that includes: President Lord Mayor Kon Vatskalis City of Darwin Vice-President Municipal Vice-President Regional Councillor Kirsty Sayers-Hunt Councillor Peter Clee Litchfield Council Wagait Shire Council Executive Members Councillor Kris Civitarese Barkly Regional Council Deputy Mayor Peter Gazey Katherine Town Council Mayor Judy MacFarlane Roper Gulf Regional Council Councillor Georgina Macleod Victoria Daly Regional Council Deputy Mayor Peter Pangquee City of Darwin Councillor Bobby Wunungmurra East Arnhem Regional Council The LGANT Secretariat looks very much forward to working with the new President. He has a track record of getting things done, is an expert negotiator with an extensive network within the Territory and across Australia and will have a focus on equity, fairness, and good governance. There are six first-timers on the Executive drawn from all parts of the Territory, all bringing a unique set of skills and experience, with Mayor MacFarlane, Deputy Mayor Pangquee and Councillor Wunungmurra re- elected from the previous Board. The LGANT Executive will meet every month and has on its agenda advocacy on issues such as water security, housing, climate change adaptation, cyclone shelters, connectivity, infrastructure funding and working with the Territory and Commonwealth governments, councils, land councils and communities to assist in the progression of closing the gap targets. The election in Alice Springs marked the end of the tenure of Mayor Damien Ryan as President after ten years on the Executive and eight of those as President.
    [Show full text]
  • The Key to a Better City
    THE KEY TO A BETTER CITY “It is time to ensure that Darwin has all the essential ingredients of a great city – and a plan to deliver for them” A MESSAGE FROM OUR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Darwin is currently facing significant economic challenges following the wind-down of the Ichthys Inpex construction phase and the decline of the mining sector. CBD office vacancies have risen once again and have been the highest in the nation with the lowest demand for three consecutive years. City retailers face stiff competition from expanding “This is a thought suburban centres, and the growth in the CBD residential population is slowing. piece presenting However, it is in such times where the opportunities and ideas rather than drive for change can be the greatest. fixed solutions. This thought piece sets out initiatives to help overcome economic challenges and trigger renewed focus on There is no silver Darwin CBD as the hub for economic growth in the NT. bullet.” The Property Council of Australia is committed to driving discussion on a range of matters to ensure the CBD is thriving for the benefit of its residents, visitors, traders and property owners. This thought piece presents ideas rather than fixed solutions. There is no silver bullet. What is clear is that a unified vision and approach is essential if we are to position the city for its future. Darwin is at a crossroads. After a historic residential, commercial, retail and industrial construction boom, our city is under pressure. Despite a rush of major projects and development, there is an overwhelming sense that there is something of a vacuum, with no clear vision or focus on how the city should move forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Environmental Report
    Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Prepared for Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, HPPL House 28-42 Ventnor Avenue West Perth WA 6005 Australia by URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 3, Hyatt Centre 20 Terrace Road East Perth WA 6004 Australia 12 March 2002 Reference: 00533-244-562 / R841 / PER Darwin LNG Plant Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd ABN 86 092 288 376 Public Environmental Report PUBLIC COMMENT INVITED Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company, proposes the construction and operation of an expanded two-train Liquefied Natural Gas facility with a maximum design capacity of 10 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). The facility will be located at Wickham Point on the Middle Arm Peninsula adjacent to Darwin Harbour near Darwin, NT. The proposed project will include gas liquefication, storage and marine loading facilities and a dedicated fleet of ships to transport LNG product. A subsea pipeline supplying natural gas from the Bayu-Undan field to Wickham Point and a similar, but smaller 3 MTPA LNG plant were the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment process and received approval from Commonwealth and Northern Territory Environment Ministers during 1998. The environmental assessment of the expanded LNG facility is being conducted at the Public Environmental Report (PER) level of the Northern Territory Environmental Assessment Act and the Commonwealth Environmental Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act. The draft PER describes the expanded LNG facility with particular emphasis on its differences from the previously approved LNG facility and addresses the potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/20 Darwin First
    2019/20 ANNUAL REPORT DARWIN FIRST CITY OF DARWIN ANNUAL REPORT 2019/20 INTRODUCTION ©2020 City of Darwin This work is copyright. Permission to reproduce information contained in this report must be obtained from: City of Darwin GPO Box 86, Darwin NT 0801 Phone: +61 8 8930 0300 Web: www.darwin.nt.gov.au Annual Report Legend This year, City of Darwin has utilised icons throughout the Annual Report to denote reference to other information or programs and projects impacted by Coronavirus as follows: CASE STUDY Indicates performance through a case study and may include references to other information or external websites. REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Indicates a reference or link to additional information which can be found on Council’s website www.darwin.nt.gov.au or other external website. COVID-19 Indicates where a program or project performance has been impacted by Coronavirus (COVID-19). The following icons are utilised throughout the report to demonstrate the level of performance that has been achieved in 2019/20. Definitions of performance are outlined below and commentary has been provided throughout the report to substantiate Council’s assessment of performance. This icon demonstrates Council’s programs or This icon demonstrates monitoring of Council’s deliverables are on track or projects have been performance for deliverables and projects is completed within budget and on schedule required. It may also indicate that a program or where Council has achieved its deliverables project did not achieve the desired result. or where a project has been completed. This icon demonstrates Council’s programs This icon demonstrates that a deliverable or or deliverables are in progress and project has not yet commenced, has been projects are almost complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 28/09/2021 05:31:59
    Dugong Status Report and Action Plans for Countries and Territories Item Type Report Authors Eros, C.; Hugues, J.; Penrose, H.; Marsh, H. Citation UNEP/DEWA/RS.02-1 Publisher UNEP Download date 28/09/2021 05:31:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/317 Figure 5.1 – The Palau region in relation to the Philippines and Indonesia. used to give dugong ribs to a carver who had died performed mainly at night from small boats powered with recently. Locally crafted jewellery from dugong ribs was outboard motors (>35hp). Most dugongs are harpooned on sale at a minimum of four stores in Koror in 1991. At after being chased. A hunter who used to dynamite least two of the retailers knew that this was illegal (Marsh dugongs (Brownell et al. 1981) claimed that he had et al. 1995). This practice had stopped by 1997 (Idechong ceased this practice in 1978. The hunters interviewed in & Smith pers comm. 1998). 1991 maintained that nets are never used to catch The major threat to dugongs in Palau is poaching. dugongs, although some of them knew that netting is an Although hunting is illegal, dugongs are still poached effective capture method. All the hunters were aware that regularly in the Koror area and along the western coast of killing dugongs is illegal. Their overwhelming motive for Babeldaob (Figure 5.2). The extent and nature of hunting hunting is that it is an exciting way to obtain meat. The was investigated by Brownell et al. (1981) and Marsh et illegality adds to the thrill.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin Harbour Region Other Projects and Monitoring 2011
    Darwin Harbour Region Other Projects and Monitoring 2011 www.greeningnt.nt.gov.au Darwin Harbour Region Other Projects and Monitoring 2011 This report was edited by Julia Fortune and John Drewry. Articles were provided by staff at the following: (1) Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport, (2) the Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, (3) the Department of Planning and Infrastructure, (4) Charles Darwin University (CDU) and (5) the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS). Aquatic Health Unit. Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport. Palmerston NT 0831. Website: www.nt.gov.au/nreta/water/aquatic/index.html This report can be cited as: J. Fortune and J. Drewry (Editors). 2011. Darwin Harbour Region Research and Monitoring 2011. Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport. Report number 18/2011D. Palmerston, NT, Australia. Specifi c articles can be cited as: Paper author (2011). Paper Title in “Darwin Harbour Region - Research and Monitoring” edited by Julia Fortune and John Drewry pp. Report 18/2011D. Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport. Palmerston, NT, Australia. Disclaimer The information contained in this report comprises general statements based on scientifi c research and monitoring. The reader is advised that some information may be unavailable, incomplete or unable to be applied in areas outside the Darwin Harbour region. Information may be superseded by future scientifi c studies, new technology and/or industry practices. © 2011 Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport. Copyright protects this publication. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and no commercial use or sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Seniors and Disability Services Directory Introduction
    Seniors and Disability Services Directory Introduction Welcome to the 2015 edition of the City of Darwin’s ‘Seniors and Disability Services Directory’. The directory provides information on services available to people with a disability and people over the age of 50 living in the Darwin community. While considerable care has been taken to ensure that information contained in this Directory is correct at the time of printing, Council takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. The Directory can also be accessed and additional copies downloaded via City of Darwin’s website www.darwin.nt.gov.au Please advise Council’s Community and Cultural Services Department if any changes are necessary on telephone 08 8930 0409. For general enquiries regarding Council services, contact: Customer Service Centre City of Darwin Harry Chan Avenue Darwin NT 0800 GPO Box 84 Darwin NT 0801 Telephone 08 8930 0300 Facsimile 08 8930 0311 Email [email protected] Website www.darwin.nt.gov.au Published by Community & Cultural Services Department, City of Darwin Publication printed by Zip Print ISBN: 978-0-9578904-3-5 i Contents ACCOMMODATION .................................................................................. 1 ADVISORY/PEAK BODY .............................................................................. 3 ADVOCACY ................................................................................................ 9 AGED CARE SERVICES ............................................................................. 12 CHILDREN’S SERVICES .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Oceanic Process and Natural Features
    EAW Expansion Project DEIS 8 8 Oceanic Process and Natural Features This chapter reports on the local physical oceanographic processes (Section 8.1); the potential impacts that the proposed dredging and coastal construction works are expected to impose on the oceanographic processes (Section 8.2); the management of impacts (Section 8.3); and project commitments (Section 8.4). The understanding of the potential impacts is mainly based on interpretation of hydrodynamic and wave model outcomes, as well as on numerical simulations of dredging and spoil disposal activities. 8.1 Existing Environment Darwin Harbour (Figure 8-1) is a large ria system, or drowned river valley, formed by post-glacial marine flooding of a dissected plateau. The Harbour was formed by rising sea levels about 6000 to 8000 years ago. The Harbour has a surface area of about 500 km2. In its southern and south-eastern portions, the harbour has three main components: East, West and Middle Arms, which merge into a single unit, along with the smaller Woods Inlet, before opening into Beagle Gulf to the north. The harbour extends for more than 30 km along this north-north-east – south-south-westerly oriented axis. The Elizabeth River flows into East Arm, while the Darwin and Blackmore rivers flow into Middle Arm. Freshwater inflow into the Harbour occurs from January to April, when estuarine conditions prevail in all areas (Hanley, 1988). The Darwin region is in general characterised by low, flat plateaus with an average elevation of about 15 m AHD, and occasional rises of up to 45 m AHD.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Mayor Exercising Discretion After Consultation with a Majority of Aldermen
    Policy Title: Meetings, Meeting Procedures and Committees Policy No: 043 Adopted By: Council Next Review Date: 16/05/2021 Responsibility: Chief Executive Officer Document Number: 21241992 Version Decision Number Adoption Date History 1 20\2501 23/02/2010 Adopted Administrative Adopted by Chief 2 01/09/2011 amendment by CEO Officers Group 3 21\0009 16/04/2012 General amendment adopted by Council 4 21\1250 16/07/2013 Addendum to Policy – Webcasting of Council’s Meetings 5 21\2207 27/05/2014 Amendment to electronic meeting attendance. 6 21/574 30/10/2012 Amended to remove Climate Change & Environment Advisory Committee 7 21\5368 16/05/2017 General amendments adopted by Council, including Webcasting Addendum merged into Policy Statement. 8 22\0011 12/09/2017 Council policy on casting vote endorsed. 1 Policy Summary This Policy addresses: • The establishment of Committees, their terms of reference, composition and method of determining membership • Annual Committee Membership • Membership of External Bodies • Order of Business at Meetings • Requirements for Business Papers • Meeting Procedures established in addition to those set forth in the Local Government Act and By-laws for Council and Committee meetings. 1 Policy 2 Policy Objectives The objective of this Policy is to provide a clear, transparent framework for the effective conduct of the business of the Council and for the governing of Council and Committee meetings. 3 Background The Council is a body corporate. It makes its decisions at Council meetings and has chosen to appoint a number of Committees to more effectively manage the business of the City. Effective meetings are a fundamental requirement for good governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory Safe Streets Audit
    Northern Territory Safe Streets Audit Prepared by the Northern Institute at Charles Darwin University and the Australian Institute of Criminology Anthony Morgan Emma Williams Lauren Renshaw Johanna Funk Special report Northern Territory Safe Streets Audit Prepared by the Northern Institute at Charles Darwin University and the Australian Institute of Criminology Anthony Morgan Emma Williams Lauren Renshaw Johanna Funk Special report aic.gov.au © Australian Institute of Criminology 2014 ISBN 978 1 922009 72 2 (Print) 978 1 922009 73 9 (Online) Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Inquiries should be addressed to the publisher. Published by the Australian Institute of Criminology GPO Box 2944 Canberra ACT 2601 Tel: (02) 6260 9200 Fax: (02) 6260 9299 Email: [email protected] Website: aic.gov.au Please note: minor revisions are occasionally made to publications after release. The online versions available on the AIC website will always include any revisions. Disclaimer: This research report does not necessarily reflect the policy position of the Australian Government. Edited and typeset by the Australian Institute of Criminology A full list of publications in the AIC Reports series can be found on the Australian
    [Show full text]