Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 34 Article 6 Number 2 Summer 2011 1-1-2011 Immunity, Italian Style: Silvio Berlusconi versus the Italian Legal System Brendan Quigley Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Brendan Quigley, Immunity, Italian Style: Silvio Berlusconi versus the Italian Legal System, 34 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 435 (2011). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol34/iss2/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Immunity, Italian Style: Silvio Berlusconi Versus the Italian Legal System By BRENDAN QUIGLEY* I. Introduction On December 13, 2009, billionaire Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi was struck in the face by a souvenir statuette while he was greeting a nighttime crowd in Milan.! News cameras captured him grimacing, face bloodied, as he ducked into a car and was rushed away to a nearby hospital. Ever meticulous about his polished appearance, the damage to Berlusconi's face - while not serious - seemed to mirror the battering that his political image had taken in the months prior and signaled an important, while perhaps unintended, message: Mr. Berlusconi is not immune to attack. The more serious assault on Berlusconi's power and influence, however, occurred a month earlier on October 7, 2009, when the Italian Constitutional Court overturned a law that granted immunity from prosecution to the holders of Italy's four highest public offices, the Prime Minister among them.3 This was of particular importance * Co-Editor in Chief, Hastings Internationaland Comparative Law Review.