High Performance Retrofit Opportunities of Toronto's 1970S Residential

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Performance Retrofit Opportunities of Toronto's 1970S Residential HIGH PERFORMANCE RETROFIT OPPORTUNITIES OF TORONTO’S 1970S RESIDENTIAL DETACHED AND SEMI-DETACHED HOUSES By Sharmeen Niger Bachelor of Architecture, Ahsanullah University of Science & Technology, 2006 Master of Planning and Design, University of Melbourne, 2010 A Major Research Project presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Building Science in the Program of Building Science Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2016 © Sharmeen Niger 2016 Author‟s Declaration Page I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. ii HIGH PERFORMANCE RETROFIT OPPORTUNITIES OF TORONTO’S 1970S RESIDENTIAL DETACHED AND SEMI-DETACHED HOUSES By Sharmeen Niger Master of Building Science, 2016 Ryerson University Abstract Based on previous studies of Toronto‟s residential archetypes, this research focuses on retrofit opportunities of 1970s OBC (Ontario Building Code) detached and semi-detached houses in order to understand its viability at the micro level. A GIS mapping has been utilized to identify the concentrations of 1970s OBC archetype in old Toronto area. A comprehensive field survey has been performed to collect data for creating a baseline model which also establish a consistent characteristic of 1970s OBC archetype. The EnergyPlus baseline model is then validated by calibration method to finalize the baseline model for an in depth retrofit analysis. The energy simulation has been performed to identify the most attractive combination of retrofit opportunities for highest cost/benefit. The research illustrates that meeting the target of 75 kWh/m2 for 1970s OBC detached and semi-detached houses is not always possible with attractive cost-effective options because of their differences in geometric shape and envelope system. iii Acknowledgment First and foremost, I would like to acknowledge the inspirational instruction and guidance of my research supervisor Dr. Miljana Horvat. As a professor her enormous support, precise suggestions and direction helped me to complete the master‟s degree. I also like to express my gratitude to Russell Richman as my second reader whose works and research papers helped me to guide my research methodology I also like to thank Denver Jermyn for his support and inspiration to work with the topic which is a continuation of his thesis work and laid the foundation for this research. l would like to thank Charles Riddell, Matt Carlsson and all other classmates for their meaningful comments and advices during the research work. I am grateful to all research participants who helped to conduct the research survey successfully. Last but not least; I want to thank my family, whose continuous support helped me to accomplish this educational achievement. iv Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Background study ............................................................................................................... 2 3 Research Question ............................................................................................................. 4 4 Purpose & Objective ........................................................................................................... 5 5 Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 6 5.1 High density single family homes in Urban Toronto Neighbourhood ............................ 7 5.2 Archetype house and parameters ................................................................................ 8 5.3 Toronto‟s 1970s OBC Archetype houses ....................................................................10 5.4 Energy Use in 70s OBC Archetype Houses ................................................................11 5.5 High Performance Buildings; Energy-Saving Retrofit Technologies to Reduce Energy Demand .................................................................................................................................11 5.6 Moisture Stability ........................................................................................................13 5.7 Energy Modeling for High Performance Retrofit ..........................................................14 6 Methodology ......................................................................................................................16 7 Phase 1- Selection of Neighbourhoods: .............................................................................17 7.1 GIS Mapping for 1970s OBC Archetype House & Neighbourhood Selection...............19 7.2 Field Survey of 1970s OBC Archetype Houses ...........................................................24 8 Phase 2- Data collection for Baseline Energy Modelling: ...................................................28 8.1 Baseline Model Preparation ........................................................................................31 8.1.1 Infiltration Model ..................................................................................................32 8.1.2 Internal Gains ......................................................................................................33 8.1.3 Interzone Openings & Envelope Framing Factors ................................................35 8.1.4 Building Specific Parameters ...............................................................................36 v 8.1.5 1970s OBC Single Detached House Baseline Model and Validation ....................39 8.1.6 1970s OBC Semi- Detached House Baseline Model and Validation ....................42 8.2 Calibration of the Baseline Energy models ..................................................................44 9 Phase 3- Retrofitting Strategies: ........................................................................................53 9.1 Energy performance & Retrofitted Energy Model Result .............................................56 9.2 Feasibility of high performance retrofitting: ..................................................................58 10 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................65 10.1 1970s OBC Archetype ................................................................................................66 10.2 Baseline Model and Energy performance of 1970s Archetype ....................................67 10.3 Energy Efficient Retrofit Impact & Target Energy Intensity 75 kWh/m2: .......................67 11 Contributions and Further Research ...............................................................................69 Appendix A: Number of Total Single Detached & Semi-Detached Houses in Urban Toronto Neighbourhoods and Number of 70s OBC Archetypes within these neighbourhoods ...............72 Appendix B: Ryerson University Ethics Approval ......................................................................74 Appendix C: Survey Questionnaire for Research Participants ...................................................75 Appendix D: Survey Data for 70s OBC Archetype Houses ........................................................79 Appendix E: Energy Bill Data for 70s Single Detached & Semi-Detached Houses ....................83 Appendix F: OBC 2012, SB-12 .................................................................................................84 Appendix G: Retrofit options for 70s OBC Single detached and Semi-detached Houses ..........85 Appendix H: Condensation and Decay Hours for retrofit assemblies .........................................91 Appendix I: Capital Cost Analysis..............................................................................................92 12 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................93 vi List of Tables Table 1: Characteristics to Identify Archetypes (Adapted from Blaszak and Richman, 2013) ..... 9 Table 2: Summary Description of the Four Housing Archetypes ...............................................10 Table 3: Selected Neighbourhoods for Single Detached Houses Survey & Energy Intensity Profile .......................................................................................................................................24 Table 4: Selected Neighbourhoods for Semi-Detached Houses Survey & Energy Intensity Profile .......................................................................................................................................24 Table 5: The Most Common Features of Detached and Semi-Detached 1970s OBC Houses ...27 Table 6: Number of Houses Surveyed in Selected Neighbourhoods .........................................28 Table 7: Parameters Selected for Data Collection and Energy Modeling...................................29 Table 8: Building Specific Parameters for Baseline Model ........................................................37 Table 9: Summary of Baseline Model Result .............................................................................43
Recommended publications
  • Ortal Horizontal Termination Clearance R1
    O N P L K K R V Electrical V Service E C Q V A F C (See Note 2) V Measure vertical clearances from this surface. J B U.S B V V (3 FT.) V B i D V M V G A V X H or i Measure horizontal clearances from this surface. V = VENT TERMINAL X = AIR SUPPLY INLET = AREA WHERE TERMINAL IS NOT PERMITTED A = 12 inches.................clearances above grade, veranda, J** = 7 ft. ......................... clearance above paved (See Note 1) porch, deck or balcony (See Note 1) sidewalk or a paved driveway B = 12 inches.................clearances to window or door located on public property that may be opened, or to perma- K = 6 inches................. clearance from sides of nently closed window. (Glass) (See Note 5) electrical service C = 24 inches.................vertical clearance to ventilated L = 12 inches................ clearance above electrical soffit located above the terminal (See Note 5) service 18 inches.................vertical clearance to unventilated (12 inches for Flush soffit located above the terminal Covered Alcove Applications Horizontal Power Vent) M*** = 18 inches .............clearance under veranda, porch, 42 inches .................for vinyl clad soffi ts and below deck, balcony or overhang electrical service 42 inches ......... vinyl D = 9 inches..................clearance to outside corner N = 6 inches ........... non-vinyl sidewalls E = 6 inches...................clearance to inside corner 12 inches ......... vinyl sidewalls F = 3 ft. (Canada) ..........not to be installed above a gas O = 18 inches ......... non-vinyl soffi t and overhang meter/regulator assembly within 3 42 inches ......... vinyl soffi t and overhang feet (90 cm) horizontally from the center-line of the regulator P = 8 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines[PDF]
    MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by the Marin County Board of Supervisors on December 10, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY STAFF Susan Adams, District 1 Brian C. Crawford Katie Rice, District 2 Director of Community Development Agency Kathrin Sears, District 3 Thomas Lai Steve Kinsey, District 4 Assistant Director of Community Development Agency Judy Arnold, District 5 Jeremy Tejirian Planning Manager of Planning Division PLANNING COMMISSION Stacey Laumann Katherine Crecelius, At-Large Planner of Planning Division Ericka Erickson, At-Large Don Dickenson, District 1 Margot Biehle, District 2 John Eller, District 3 Michael Dyett, Principal-In-Charge Wade Holland, District 4 Matt Taecker, Principal Peter Theran, District 5 Jeannie Eisberg, Senior Associate WORKING GROUP Supported by a grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Bob Hayes Commission Smart Growth Technical Assistance Program Bruce Burman John Eller Steven Aiello Curry Eckelhoff Rich Gumbiner Allan Bortel Marge Macris Kathleen Harris Robert Pendoley Scott Gerber Steven Lucas Sim Van der Ryn Cover image adapted from: The American Transect, http://www.transect.org/rural_img.htm i CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................................1-1 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................................................1-1 Fundamental Design
    [Show full text]
  • Veranda Park Ii Residential
    Staff Report to the M P L 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 0 1 6 Municipal Planning Board I TEM # 11 June 21, 2016 VERANDA PARK II RESIDENTIAL Location Map Subject Site S UMMARY Owner Property Location: 2201, 2175 & 2141 S. Hia- Staff’s Recommendation: Approval of the re- wassee Rd. 6951, 6920, & 6850 Via Lago Ln. quest, subject to the conditions in this report. (south of S. Hiawassee Rd., north of Turkey lake, James Stowers, Esq. west of Lake Debra Dr., and eat of Westpointe Public Comment: Courtesy notices were mailed Geosam Capital US, LP Blvd. and Via Livorno Ave.) Parcel IDs #02-23-28 to property owners within 300 ft. of the subject Owner’s Representative -8214-00-000/ 001/ 020/ 030/ 052 & 02-23-28- property during the week of May 2, 2016. A public 8209-01-001/ 004/ 005) (±10.98 acres, District 6) meeting was held at the Hair in Motion Studio on May 4, 2016. Parking was the primary of concern of Applicant’s Request: Specific Parcel Master the attendees. On May 25, the applicant presented to Applicant Plan request for the residential phase of the Veran- the MetroWest Master Association board meeting. da Park II development, including four multifamily As of the published date of this report, staff received Sam Sebaali, P.E., President residential buildings totaling 642 dwelling units three inquiries from the public. Deffered from May Florida Engineering Group, with parking garages and the construction of Via MPB at the request of the applicant. Inc. Lago Ln. The development will occupy portions of Lots 2 and 3, Lot 5B and Tract A of Veranda Park Third Replat as well as Tract D and E of Veranda Project Planner Park Second Replat.
    [Show full text]
  • Refined Living. Historically Richmond
    REFINED LIVING. HISTORICALLY RICHMOND. #VerandaPorchLife 1 • • VE RAN DA our livable n. (v ə`randə) luxury An expansive porch and a master-planned community where history inspires, beauty captivates, and families flourish. table of CONTENTS location lifestyle homes WELCOME PLAY CREATING 05 09 13 From Johnson Development to you It’s all about living well CONNECTIONS Our vision for you 06 MASTER PLAN 10 EDUCATION 600 acres of country charm Lamar CISD works for your child 14 BUILDING DREAMS Our builders have the perfect plan 07 OUR ROOTS 12 FIND US Delve into local history In the heart of Fort Bend County JOHNSON 15 DEVELOPMENT CORP. Discover how we celebrate life #VerandaPorchLife 3 WELCOME VERANDA to Where every dream comes true Inspired by the romance of the South, Veranda is a fresh take on comfortable small town living where life’s greatest moments are shared with friends and neighbors on a welcoming front porch. A project of Johnson Development Corp. — known for innovative and environmentally sensitive master planning — Veranda offers homes by Houston’s leading homebuilders. Residents will take advantage of living just minutes from major employers and world-class shopping, dining, and entertainment. Antique in historic Richmond. Attend a concert at the Smart Financial Centre in Sugar Land. Or enjoy an unforgettable night on the town in Houston — the nation’s fourth-largest city. 1ST CLASSMAIL WELCOME VERANDA to e invite you to take Most of all, connect with W a stroll through our hospitable vibe and Veranda, our new one-of-a- welcoming spirit. You’re not kind community where the just buying a house; you’re historic past and the vibrant adopting a community that present meet, creating a will be your home for years to connection that will last well into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VERANDA WALL MOUNTED FAN INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Please Read and Save These Instructions
    THE VERANDA WALL MOUNTED FAN INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Please read and save these instructions These instructions are to be used in the installation of the following QUORUM INTERNATIONAL fans... The Veranda © 2014 Quorum International. All Rights Reserved. P.O. Box 961008 • Fort Worth, TX 76161 • (817) 626-5483 • FAX (817) 626-5540 IO220-01/14 QUORUM'S UNIQUE LIMITED LIFETIME WARRANTY This warranty gives you specific legal technical skill, competence, or experience superior product if the defective unit is rights, and you may also have other rights of the user. returned prepaid to us. which vary from state to state. 8. Light bulbs, glass or acrylic TO GET WARRANTY SERVICE - WHAT IS COVERED- components or accessories. To obtain warranty service, the product Except as specified below, the manufacturer 9. Minor occurrences of wobble are must be returned prepaid to Quorum. of this product warrants it to be free of all accepted as normal and should not (This warranty is not enforceable outside defects in workmanship and material. necessarily be considered a defect. the United States.) Details regarding return shipment are explained elsewhere WHAT IS NOT COVERED BY THIS WHO MAY ENFORCE WARRANTY- in this manual. Whenever warranty WARRANTY- This warranty may be enforced only by service is required, you must present a 1. All costs of removal or reinstallation the original purchaser. The end user must copy of the original dated sales receipt as of the fan. possess a dated proof of purchase from an proof of coverage. authorized Quorum dealer to establish a 2. Damage resulting from failure to warranty claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Division Staff Report Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2014 Prepared By: Lauren Hocker, Associate Planner
    Planning Division Staff Report Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2014 Prepared by: Lauren Hocker, Associate Planner ITEM V-A: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION – 3801 MINERS RAVINE DRIVE – SRSP PARCEL 54 ELLIOT HOMES “VERANDA” – PL13-0314 REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and associated Design Review Permit for a Residential Subdivision to construct 149 single-family residential lots and 8 common area lots on a 14.56-acre parcel. Applicant – Jeff Thompson, Morton & Pitalo, Inc. Property Owner – Price Walker, Elliott Homes, Inc. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: A. Adopt the two findings of fact for the Design Review Permit for a Residential Subdivision and; B. Approve the Design Review Permit for a Residential Subdivision with five conditions of approval; C. Adopt the three findings of fact for the Tentative Subdivision Map; and D. Approve the Tentative Subdivision Map, subject to sixty-eight (68) conditions of approval. SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES There are no outstanding issues associated with this request. The applicant has reviewed and is in agreement with the recommended conditions of approval. BACKGROUND The Project, “Veranda,” is located within the Stoneridge Specific Plan (SRSP, see Figure 1). The SRSP was approved in March 1998, and includes 1,117 acres of mixed land uses. The Plan includes 2,861 single and multi-family units and Commercial, Business Professional, Park, and Open Space uses. At buildout, the Plan area is expected to accommodate approximately 7,267 residents and provide 1,563 jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • DECLARATION of COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, and RESTRICTIONS for VERANDA PRESERVE THIS DECLARATION of Covenants, Conditions, and Restr
    DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR VERANDA PRESERVE THIS DECLARATION of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for Veranda Preserve ("Declaration") is made this _____ day of ______, 2018, by Veranda St. Lucie Land Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), for itself and its successors or assigns. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of the real property located in St. Lucie County, Florida more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property (as hereinafter defined) will be developed into a residential planned development within which Developer intends for Builders (as hereinafter defined) to construct single family homes; and WHEREAS, to preserve the value and desirability of the Property and amenities thereon for the benefit of all owners of the Property, and to establish a method for the administration, maintenance, preservation, use and enjoyment of such Property as are now or may hereafter be subject to this Declaration, Developer deems it desirable to subject the Property to certain protective covenants, conditions and restrictions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the Developer has caused the incorporation of the Veranda Preserve Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Association"), a Florida corporation not for profit, for the purposes and intents herein set forth and as described in the Articles of Incorporation for said Association; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Developer hereby declares that
    [Show full text]
  • Veranda Design and Construction the BRANZ Helpline Often Receives Questions About Veranda Design and by ALIDE ELKINK, Construction
    DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERANDAS USING NZS 3604:2011 DESIGN RIGHT Veranda design and construction The BRANZ helpline often receives questions about veranda design and BY ALIDE ELKINK, construction. Here, we answer some of those questions. FREELANCE TECHNICAL WRITER, WELLINGTON A VERANDA IS defined in the MBIE 2014 document All work must be Code compliant Connections to resist uplift Guidance: Building work that does not require Regardless of whether a building consent is Wind forces on a veranda roof, which increase a building consent as ‘a long porch [that] can required, all construction work must comply the pressure on the underside of the roof and extend along the full length, or even around more with the New Zealand Building Code (NZBC). decrease the pressure on the top side, can be con- than one side, of a building.’ For verandas, this means compliance with NZS siderable. Connections between the posts and Porches are defined as ‘roofed structures which 3604:2011 Timber-framed buildings which is cited beams and the posts and concrete footings must project from the face of a building [that] may by NZBC clauses B1 Structure and B2 Durability. be able to withstand the uplift forces generated. have sides but … are open at the front [and] The only references in NZS 3604:2011 to NZS 3604:2011 Table 9.1 sets out the concrete generally used to protect a building entrance and veranda design are in: volumes required for post footings depending on: to provide shelter.’ ● section 9, which contains tables for concrete ● roof type (light/heavy) Both verandas and porches ‘often extend over post footing sizes (Table 9.1) and connections ● wind zone (EH, VH, H, M, L) raised decks or patios’.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assignment on Thermal Comfort and the Use Of
    AN ASSIGNMENT ON THERMAL COMFORT AND THE USE OF VERANDAS IN RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN AKURE. Submitted by: ALUKO ADEBOYE EBENEZER ARC/04/4318. Course: APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY [ARC 810] To The Department Of Architecture, Federal University of Technology, Akure In Partial Fulfillment of M. Tech Degree in Architecture Lecturer in Charge: Prof. Ogunsote August, 2011 1 Abstract This paper presents the result of an investigation on verandas to achieve thermal comfort in residential houses. In this study the veranda is singled out as a significant building element to attain environmental comfort, a field study in three outlaying areas of the city of Akure was carried out. The results show that the front veranda and the back or side porch is still an important for domestic outdoor activities and receiving of fresh breeze. The population recognizes the veranda’s importance as a shading element and residential buildings in Akure has always incorporated this knowledge in to the design of their houses. The use of Verandas to achieve Indoor thermal comfort in a residential building is essential for occupants’ well-being and productivity, thus providing for indoor thermal comfort and reducing energy use in buildings which is becoming increasingly difficult. Human body response intelligently to different climate conditions by acclimatization and adaptation. The different thermal comfort behavior of human need for people in different climate condition and also for different season clearly shows that the design strategy for building must comply with the locality of the building. Intelligent system may be used for the purpose of compliance to thermal comfort. This paper describes typical strategies to naturally improve comfort in a climate which is hot and humid without air conditioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiberon Decking Installation
    DECKING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ARMORGUARD, PARAMOUNT, SYMMETRY, HORIZON, SANCTUARY, PROTECT ADVANTAGE, GOOD LIFE AND VERANDA BY FIBERON 1-800-573-8841 | FIBERONDECKING.COM Table of Contents Safety Information ..................................2 Cortex Hidden Surface Fastener Installation ..............7 Warranty ..........................................2 Removing Damaged Cortex Plugs or Screws ............. 8 Pre-Installation .....................................3 Phantom Hidden Fastener Installation - Grooved Edge Decking 9 Surface Fastening and Fascia Installation ............... 5 Hidden Fastener Installation for Paramount Grooved Edge . 12 Post Sleeve Installation .............................14 Safety Information Read and understand this entire manual before you begin the installation of your decking. WARNING: This decking is for deck surfaces only, and not structural applications. STATIC ELECTRICITY NOTICE CAUTION: When using a ladder on composite decking, it Dry or windy environments may create a temporary condition of is mandatory to lay down a sheet of plywood over the deck static electricity, which will vary depending on climate and site surface to disperse the load of the ladder’s feet to nearby conditions. In the case of excessive static buildup on an installed underlying joists. Drill fasteners downward through the deck, Fiberon recommends the following procedure: top of the plywood sheet to keep it from slipping. Position fasteners so they adequately protrude and rest firmly in 1. Remove loose debris from the deck surface. the gaps between the deck boards and into the joists. This 2. Dilute ACL Staticide® Concentrate as directed on the bottle. will avoid leaving holes in your decking once the plywood sheet is removed. Always follow the ladder manufacturer’s 3. Spray or mop the entire surface of the deck. Allow to air dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Desp/Gtz Traditional Housing ..N Agam
    DESP/GTZ TRADITIONAL HOUSING_..N AGAM DESP/GTZ P LTC BUILDING CONSTRUCTON SECTION TRADITIONAL HOUSING IN AGAM Prepared by: Arch. Ahmad. A. B. With Collaboration of Eng. Yama. Peshawar 21st Oct 1992. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOREWORD: PRESENTATION OF THE SURVEY INTRODUCTION CLIMATICAL SITUATION SEISMICITY OF THE AREA AVAILABILITY OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TRADITIONAL HOUSES IN AGAM STUDY OF THE TRADITIONAL HOUSES FOUNDATION & WALL CONSTRUCTION CEILINGS, ROOFS AND DRAINS WALL PROTECTIONS OVER HANGS TRADITIONAL TYPES OF DOORS & WINDOWS STAIR WAYS ACCESS STORAGE FACILITIES STOVES & WELL BIBLIOGRAPHY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my deep gratitute to Mr. OLIVIER SCHERRER and Mr. LATIFY for their contribution to this report and to Mr. YAMA for his good partnership. Spcial thanks also to Mr. WILFRIED HERRICH for giving me the oportunity and the time to write this report. FOREWORD: This report is a collection of information about Nangarhar Province (Agam and Kudikhel districts) which shows the situation of thesettlement, life of the people, methods and techniques of the construction in this area. The main object of this reportis to present the traditional types of construction, the climatical, topographical conditions and the seismicity of the area. Knowing about these information will give us the opportunity to make proper designs for this area and to avoid of mistakes regarding types, size, technical problems of buildings etc. The survey data was collected on the basis of interviews and discussions with keymembers of the villages in the surveyed area. PRESENTATION OF THE SURVEY GTZ /DESP Domestic Energy Saving Project started its cross border activity in Dec. 1991. After various missions for needs assessments and negotiation, the residential building program was setup in Agam village /Khugyani District /Ningarhar province.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Mls Single Family Detached
    GEORGIA MLS Page 1 of 4 TypeRSD SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (SD) INPUT SHEET Property Address __________________________________ Listing Number _____________________________ __________________________________ List Date/Expire Date ________________________ City State Zip Office Name _________________________________ Agent Name ________________________________ Office Name (2) _________________________________ Agent Name (2)_____________________________ Location StateR_ _ CountyR______________________________ AreaR____ Street NumberR______ Street NameR________________________________________ Quadrant _ _ (NE,NW,SE,SW) R Unit/Lot Number _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City ______________________________ ZipR_____-____ (Zip 4) SubdivisionR__________________________________________________ Subdivision or complex name. If no subdivision enter NONE Terms R R Listing Agreement Type List DateR__/__/____ Expire DateR__/__/____ List Price $___________ - Exclusive Agency (mm/dd/yyyy) (mm/dd/yyyy) - Exclusive Right to Sell List Agent IDR____________ R List Broker ________ Listing broker code List Agent 2 ID_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Co-listing Agent. Must be valid Georgia MLS agent ID Owner Name _____________________________ Owner of record Owner Phone _ _ _ -___-____ Variable Rate CommissionR_ R $ Commission ______.__ Is the commission variable? (Y/N) % Tax/Legal Tax IDR________________________ TaxesR_______ Tax YearR____ Tax ID number assigned by county. Also known as Parcel ID or PIN Total taxes (County & City) Year of taxes shown Land Lot ____ District ____
    [Show full text]