Document.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Document.Pdf CERTIFICATION OF APPRAISAL Each person signing below certifies to the best of their personal knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4. We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 5. The engagement for this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics & Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, which include the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 8. Adam Zimmerman has made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 9. No one has provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person(s) signing this report. 10. We have experience in appraising properties similar to the subject and are in compliance with the Competency Rule of USPAP. 11. The appraiser(s) has not provided any appraisal related services at the subject property during the previously 36 months. 12. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 13. As of the date of this report, Adam Zimmerman has completed the standards and ethics requirements for candidates of designation of the Appraisal Institute. 14. The appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum value, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. HILCO REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL, LLC Adam Zimmerman Vice President MS Certified General Appraiser #TG-3679 AERIAL PHOTO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Location: The site is located at 7276 Casino Strip Resort Blvd. in Robinson, Tunica County County, MSA 38664. Property Description: The subject property is considered a limited service hotel, operating under the Days Inn brand. The property offers 66 guestrooms and was built in 1994. The subject site is comprised of one, 1.50-acre parcel. Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): 3104180000000100 Interest Appraised: Fee Simple, Going Concern Date of Value(s): January 23, 2018 Date of Inspection: January 29, 2018 Ownership: Jasveer S Brar Highest and Best Use Opinion If Vacant: Future Hotel or Commercial development As Improved: Current use as a hotel Site & Improvements Zoning: None, Tunica County Land Area: 1.50 acres – Assessor’s Parcel Map Number of Stories: 2 Year Built: 1994 Type of Construction: Masonry: 2 story hotel Gross Building Area: 35,720 SF Number of Rooms: 66 rooms Amenities: Breakfast room Parking: 84 spaces EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS & HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS The value conclusion is subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions and certifications. In addition, the following extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions, if any, are summarized below, which might affect the assignment results. Any changes from these assumptions may affect market value and we reserve the right to revise our analysis. Use of these extraordinary assumptions may have affected the assignment results. Extraordinary Assumptions The square footages of the building area and other information such as parking count were obtained from the Harris County Records and assumed accurate. We reserve the right to amend our value conclusion if these assumptions are later proven incorrect. It is our understanding that the subject is currently in violation of its franchise agreement and has been removed from the Choice Hotel's web site. We also understand that the subject needs a PIP (Property Improvement Plan) to remove it from non-performing status. We do not know the PIP amount, but estimate it could exceed $500,000, given the subject's below brand standards. We recommend a review of any PIP information provided by Choice Hotels. We were not provided signicant financials. We estimated the subject's ADR and Occupancy by using market based data such as an STR Trend report. We did present an Income Capitalization Analysis (ERRM) as a general valuation tool, but projecting ADR, Occupancy, Rev Par and operating expenses as well as selecting discount rates and cap rates without knowing any current or historical operating income and expenses, any required capital expenditures, or understanding the franchise agreement is highly speculative. We assume the subject is underperforming based on its market share, but we are uncertain as to the amount of capital needed (without understanding financials, condition and spending requirements) to stabilize the hotel. We were unable to complete a reliable penetration analysis. If full recent financials become available, we reserve the right to modify our analysis. We assume the property is and will continue to be managed by a competent management group, typically provided for similar hotels. We estimated (by allocation) the value of the FF&E. We do not know the current condition of the FF&E (Case and soft goods) and have estimated depreciation based on similar aged hotel valuations we have completed. Hypothetical Conditions None TABLE OF CONTENTS INDTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 REGIONAL ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 5 NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 8 SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................... 14 IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 16 REAL ESTATE TAXES ........................................................................................................ 21 ZONING ............................................................................................................................... 21 HOTEL MARKET ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 22 HIGHEST AND BEST USE .................................................................................................. 31 VALUATION PROCESS ...................................................................................................... 33 INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH............................................................................ 36 SALES COMPARISON APPROACH ................................................................................... 40 RECONCILIATION AND FINAL VALUE OPINION .............................................................. 46 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS .................................................................. 49 ADDENDA ITEMS INTRODUCTION INDTRODUCTION Identification of Subject Property Property Description: The subject property is a limited-service Days Inn hotel that opened in 1994 as a Knights Inn and was converted to a Days Inn in 2008. The property features 66 rooms. The hotel offers complimentary hot breakfast. Situated on a 1.50 acre site, the property is located in the Tunica Resort Hotel Market. Address: 7276 Casino Strip Resort Blvd., Robinson, Tunica County County, MSA, 38664 Assessor’s Parcel No.: 3104180000000100 Description of Property Interest Appraised Interest Appraised: Fee Simple, Going Concern Interest Property Ownership and Three Years Sales History Current Ownership: The subject is currently owned by Jasveer S Brar Management/Franchise The subject is franchised under the Days Inn brand. We were not Agreements: provided a copy of the franchise agreement. The subject may be in violation of the agreement. Sale History: There have been no other transactions that we are aware of in the last three years. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, the property is not currently on the market for sale. Intended Use and Users of the Appraisal This appraisal is to be used by the Client, Three River Planning & Development District, for mortgage lending purposes. The intended user(s) is Three River Planning & Development District. All others reading or relying on this appraisal report are considered unintended users of this appraisal. The appraisal cannot be used for any other reason including appealing tax assessments, litigation, settling an estate, etc. Should anyone other than the client read or rely on this report, no fiduciary obligation is owed by the appraisers to that party. Any additional work will be billed at an hourly rate, for expert witness testimony, preparation for testimony, and any other work deemed necessary. Hilco Real Estate Appraisal, LLC Page 1 INTRODUCTION Dates of Inspection and Valuation The value conclusion
Recommended publications
  • Bowdre Place –
    Bowdre Place – Sold 8000 acres OFFERED BY: RUTLEDGE INVESTMENT COMPANY 5160 SANDERLIN, SUITE ONE MEMPHIS, TN 38117 (901) 766-9041 Rutledge Investment Company and Rainer Realty are the Exclusive Agents for the property described herein. This brochure and all information contained herein is believed to be correct; however, we make no guarantee as to its accuracy. Prospective buyers are urged to inspect the property and perform their own independent due diligence. Rutledge Investment Company, Rainer Realty, and its agents assume no liability as to errors, ommissions or investment results. Category: Sold Price: $ 60,000,000 Bowdre Place – Sold Area: 8000 acres Type: Cropland Description The Bowdre Place property, which has been in the C.P. Owen family for several generations, consists of 8,059.2 acres of farm and development land in the north Mississippi Delta near Tunica and Robinsonville, MS. This is a premier Mississippi Delta investment grade property with an outstanding past and very promising future. It not only consists of some of the highest quality productive farmland in the south, but due to its prime location, it has a solid history of commercial and industrial development. Over the past 20 years, portions of Bowdre Place have been sold and developed for an array of projects. Projects include hotels, convenience stores, a golf course and fitness center, bank locations, a medical clinic, a US post office, apartment buildings, a residential subdivision, a large manufacturing plant, and numerous billboards. Additionally, a new Chinese owned automotive plant is now under construction on adjacent land which was previously part of Bowdre Place.
    [Show full text]
  • July 20, Memphis.Frm.Fm
    July 20-23, 2008 - Memphis, TN One of the positives that I will take away from this trip is the oppor- tunity to have met some really interesting people along the way. These past few days while traveling in and around Memphis Ten- nessee is a good example. I arrived at the Wolf River air strip a lit- tle past noon on Saturday. This is a smooth, well manicured grass runway of over 3,000 feet in length that is just to the East, and out- side of the Class “B” airspace that encompasses most of the metro- politan Memphis area. After landing, I approached the airport owner and on site manager Woody Degan and filled him in on the details of my trip, asking if I could base there for a few days. He readily agreed, and even helped me off load the airplane and watched as I unfolded its wings. He was the first of several inter- esting people that I met on what was really the first multi day stop along my proposed 8,000 mile route. I am about to begin the downwind leg for my landing to the south at Wolf River airport. It is hard to believe that this rural setting is just a few miles from the big city of Memphis TN. The Wolf River airport has been family owned for over 35 years, and Woody, his brother and mother currently operate this friendly and laid back facility. However Woody has another business which takes up as much, if not more of his time.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 596
    Calendar No. 596 106TH CONGRESS REPORT "! 2d Session SENATE 106±309 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2001 JUNE 14, 2000.ÐOrdered to be printed Mr. SHELBY, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. 2720] The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2720) mak- ing appropriations for the Department of Transportation and re- lated agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. Amounts of new budget (obligational) authority for fiscal year 2001 Amount of bill as reported to Senate ...................... $15,295,400,000 Amount of budget estimates, 2001 .......................... 16,146,737,000 Fiscal year 2000 enacted .......................................... 14,429,976,000 64±948 cc C O N T E N T S SUMMARY OF MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS Page Total obligational authority .................................................................................... 5 TITLE IÐDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Immediate Office of the Secretary .......................................................................... 10 Immediate Office of the Deputy Secretary ............................................................ 11 Office of the General Counsel ................................................................................. 11 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy ........................................................... 12 Office of the
    [Show full text]
  • Memphis Regional Freight Infrastructure Plan
    Memphis Regional Freight Infrastructure Plan Prepared For: Greater Memphis Chamber March 2010 Report Title Here Contact Information Joseph Waldo Senior Consultant 610-490-2636 [email protected] Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: MEMPHIS IN THE GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN ................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2: MEMPHIS REGIONAL FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY ...................................................... 9 CHAPTER 3: MEMPHIS REGIONAL FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE EVALUATION .................................................. 10 CHAPTER 4: MEMPHIS REGIONAL FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... 11 Future Developments........................................................................................................................... 13 Memphis Regional Infrastructure Plan Recommendations By State................................................... 15 CHAPTER 1: MEMPHIS IN THE GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN.................................................................... 17 THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC PICTURE .............................................................................................................. 17 The World Economic Outlook .............................................................................................................. 17 Regional Economic Outlook ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trends and Market Forces Shaping Small Community Air Service in the United States
    Trends and Market Forces Shaping Small Community Air Service in the United States Michael D. Wittman MIT International Center for Air Transportation William S. Swelbar MIT International Center for Air Transportation Report No. ICAT-2013-02 MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper No. 1 May 2013 1 Introduction to paper series This report, Trends and Market Forces Shaping Small Community Air Service in the United States, is the first in a series of papers written under the umbrella of the MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper series. The aim of the paper series is to examine and analyze the past, current, and anticipated future trends of small community air service in the United States. The series is intended for a general audience of airline and airport executives, aviation policy makers, the news media, and anyone with an interest in the availability of commercial air service at the nation’s smaller airports. The authors of this paper series hope that these reports will serve to inform the policy debate with relevant and accurate statistical analysis, such that those responsible for deciding the future of small community air service will do so armed with factual basis for their actions. The authors of the MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper series are members of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s International Center for Air Transportation, one of the nation’s premier centers for aviation, airline, and airport research. Financial support for study authors has been provided in part by the MIT Airline Industry Consortium, an interdisciplinary group of airlines, airport councils, policy makers, and advocacy groups dedicated to improving the state of the practice of air transportation research in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 535
    Calendar No. 535 109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session SENATE 109–293 TRANSPORTATION, TREASURY, HOUSING AND URBAN DE- VELOPMENT, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2007 JULY 26, 2006.—Ordered to be printed Mr. BOND, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 5576] The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the bill (H.R. 5576) making appropriations for the Departments of Trans- portation, Treasury, and Housing and Urban Development, the Ju- diciary, District of Columbia, and independent agencies for the fis- cal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes, re- ports the same to the Senate with an amendment and recommends that the bill as amended do pass. Amounts of new budget (obligational) authority for fiscal year 2007 Total of bill as reported to the Senate .................... $89,389,989,000 Amount of 2006 appropriations 1 ............................. 102,948,146,000 Amount of 2007 budget estimate ............................ 86,748,272,000 Amount of House allowance 2 .................................. 86,656,536,000 Bill as recommended to Senate compared to— 2006 appropriations .......................................... ¥13,558,157,000 2007 budget estimate ........................................ ∂2,641,717,000 House allowance ................................................ ∂2,654,889,000 1 Includes $20,685,563,000 in emergency appropriations. 2 Excludes $575,200,000 considered by the House for the District of Columbia. 28–780 PDF C O N T
    [Show full text]
  • Country IATA ICAO Airport Name Location Served 남극 남극 TNM SCRM Teniente R. Marsh Airport Villa Las Estrellas, Antarctica 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MDZ SAME Gov
    Continent Country IATA ICAO Airport name Location served 남극 남극 TNM SCRM Teniente R. Marsh Airport Villa Las Estrellas, Antarctica 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MDZ SAME Gov. Francisco Gabrielli International Airport (El Plumerillo) Mendoza, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 FMA SARF Formosa International Airport (El Pucú Airport) Formosa, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 RSA SAZR Santa Rosa Airport Santa Rosa, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 COC SAAC Concordia Airport (Comodoro Pierrestegui Airport) Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 GHU SAAG Gualeguaychú Airport Gualeguaychú, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 JNI SAAJ Junín Airport Junín, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 MGI SAAK Martín García Island Airport Buenos Aires Province, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 PRA SAAP General Justo José de Urquiza Airport Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 ROS SAAR Rosario - Islas Malvinas International Airport Rosario, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 AEP SABE Jorge Newbery Airpark Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LCM SACC La Cumbre Airport La Cumbre, Córdoba, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 COR SACO Ingeniero Ambrosio L.V. Taravella International Airport (Pajas Blancas) Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 DOT SADD Don Torcuato International Airport (closed) Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 FDO SADF San Fernando Airport San Fernando, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LPG SADL La Plata City International Airport La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 EZE SAEZ Ministro Pistarini International Airport Ezeiza (near Buenos Aires), Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 HOS SAHC Chos Malal Airport (Oscar Reguera Airport) Chos Malal, Neuquén, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 GNR SAHR Dr. Arturo Umberto Illia Airport General Roca, Río Negro, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 APZ SAHZ Zapala Airport Zapala, Neuquén, Argentina 남아메리카-남동부 아르헨티나 LGS SAMM Comodoro D.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 91, SFAR No. 62
    Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 91, SFAR No. 62 destination is any point in Iraq or that in- (1) In the airspace at or below the specified cludes a landing at any point in Iraq in its altitude and within a 2-nautical-mile radius, intended itinerary, from any point in the or, if directed by ATC, within a 5-nautical United States; mile radius, of an airport listed in section 2 (b) No person shall operate an aircraft on a of this SFAR; and flight to any point in the United States from (2) In the airspace at or below the specified any point in Iraq, or from any intermediate altitude along the most direct and expedi- point on a flight where the origin is in Iraq, tious routing, or on a routing directed by or from any point on a flight which includes ATC, between an airport listed in section 2 of a departure from any point in Iraq in its in- this SFAR and the outer boundary of the tended itinerary; or Mode C veil airspace overlying that airport, (c) No person shall operate an aircraft over consistent with established traffic patterns, the territory of the United States if that air- noise abatement procedures, and safety. craft’s flight itinerary includes any landing Section 2. Effective until December 30, at or departure from any point in Iraq. 1993. Airports at which the provisions of 3. Permitted operations. This SFAR shall § 91.215(b)(2) do not apply. not prohibit the flight operations between (1) Airports within a 30-nautical-mile ra- the United States and Iraq described in sec- dius of The William B.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimodal Transportation Assets, Needs and Recommendations Report
    Delta Regional Authority Multimodal Transportation Assets, Needs and Recommendations Report July 2008 SAFETEA–LU Section 1923 1st Edition Disclaimer: Personnel from various agencies within the U.S. Department of Transportation pro- vided information to the Delta Regional Authority during the study which led to this report. Similarly, personnel from such agencies may have made comments regarding factual assertions in various drafts of this report. However, neither the U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation nor any of its agencies necessarily endorse this report nor con- cur with any recommendation contained in the report. July 18, 2008 When Congress directed the Delta Regional Authority to prepare a report on the multimodal transportation assets and needs in our region, along with recommendations, we were delighted to take on the task. It fits perfectly into the DRA's role as a planner, coordinator of resources and advocate for the Delta. We also will prepare a strategic plan that's designed to guide the implementation of the recommendations in this report. That task also was directed by Congress in section 1923 of the 2005 national highway act. This report complements our Delta Development Highway System plan, which was released last year. When the DRA was created by Congress in 2000, one of the investment priorities outlined was the transportation infrastructure of the region. We've made numerous infrastructure investments in recent years. With the help of state departments of transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and local stakeholders, the Delta Development Highway System plan was compiled. It identified 3,843 miles of highways slated for improvements at a cost of $18.5 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Subchapter F—Air Traffic and General Operating Rules
    SUBCHAPTER FÐAIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES PART 91ÐGENERAL OPERATING 91.115 Right-of-way rules: Water operations. 91.117 Aircraft speed. AND FLIGHT RULES 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General. 91.121 Altimeter settings. SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS 91.123 Compliance with ATC clearances and SFAR No. 29±4 instructions. SFAR No. 50±2 91.125 ATC light signals. SFAR No. 51±1 91.126 Operating on or in the vicinity of an SFAR No. 60 airport in Class G airspace. SFAR No. 61±2 91.127 Operating on or in the vicinity of an SFAR No. 62 airport in Class E airspace. SFAR No. 64 91.129 Operations in Class D airspace. SFAR No. 65±1 91.130 Operations in Class C airspace. SFAR No. 66±2 91.131 Operations in Class B airspace. SFAR No. 67 91.133 Restricted and prohibited areas. SFAR No. 71 91.135 Operations in Class A airspace. SFAR No. 77 91.137 Temporary flight restrictions. SFAR No. 78 91.138 Temporary flight restrictions in na- SFAR No. 79 tional disaster areas in the State of Ha- SFAR No. 82 waii. 91.139 Emergency air traffic rules. Subpart AÐGeneral 91.141 Flight restrictions in the proximity of the Presidential and other parties. Sec. 91.143 Flight limitation in the proximity of 91.1 Applicability. space flight operations. 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the 91.144 Temporary restriction on flight oper- pilot in command. ations during abnormally high baro- 91.5 Pilot in command of aircraft requiring metric pressure conditions. more than one required pilot.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 91, SFAR No. 50–2
    Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 91, SFAR No. 50–2 91.703 Operations of civil aircraft of U.S. 91.903 Policy and procedures. registry outside of the United States. 91.905 List of rules subject to waivers. 91.705 Operations within airspace des- 91.907–91.999 [Reserved] ignated as Minimum Navigation Per- formance Specification Airspace. APPENDICES TO PART 91 91.706 Operations within airspace designed APPENDIX A TO PART 91—CATEGORY II OPER- as Reduced Vertical Separation Min- ATIONS: MANUAL, INSTRUMENTS, EQUIP- imum Airspace. MENT, AND MAINTENANCE 91.707 Flights between Mexico or Canada APPENDIX B TO PART 91—AUTHORIZATIONS TO and the United States. EXCEED MACH 1 (§ 91.817) 91.709 Operations to Cuba. APPENDIX C TO PART 91—OPERATIONS IN THE 91.711 Special rules for foreign civil air- NORTH ATLANTIC (NAT) MINIMUM NAVIGA- craft. 91.713 Operation of civil aircraft of Cuban TION PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS registry. (MNPS) AIRSPACE 91.715 Special flight authorizations for for- APPENDIX D TO PART 91—AIRPORTS/LOCA- eign civil aircraft. TIONS: SPECIAL OPERATING RESTRICTIONS 91.717–91.799 [Reserved] APPENDIX E TO PART 91—AIRPLANE FLIGHT RECORDER SPECIFICATIONS Subpart I—Operating Noise Limits APPENDIX F TO PART 91—HELICOPTER FLIGHT RECORDER SPECIFICATIONS 91.801 Applicability: Relation to part 36. APPENDIX G TO PART 91—OPERATIONS IN RE- 91.803 Part 125 operators: Designation of ap- DUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMUM plicable regulations. (RVSM) AIRSPACE 91.805 Final compliance: Subsonic airplanes. AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103, 91.807 Phased compliance under parts 121, 40113, 40120, 44101, 44111, 44701, 44709, 44711, 125, and 135: Subsonic airplanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Memphis Freight Infrastructure Plan
    Memphis Freight Infrastructure Plan Prepared For: Greater Memphis Chamber October 19,2009 Report Title Here Contact Information Joseph Waldo Senior Consultant 610-490-2636 [email protected] Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1: MEMPHIS IN THE GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN..............................................................................................7 CHAPTER 2: MEMPHIS FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY.................................................................................9 CHAPTER 3: MEMPHIS FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE EVALUATION.............................................................................10 CHAPTER 4: MEMPHIS FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................11 FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS..........................................................................................................................................12 MEMPHIS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS BY STATE.........................................................................14 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS FOR THE MEMPHIS INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN ................................................................15 MEMPHIS IN THE GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN ..................................................................................................16 THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC PICTURE ...........................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]