Critical point and Bose-Einstein in pion

V. A. Kuznietsov,1 O. S. Stashko,1 O. V. Savchuk,2 and M. I. Gorenstein2, 3 1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine 2Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Frankfurt am Main, Germany 3Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine (Dated: August 24, 2021) The Bose-Einstein condensation and the - first order transition are studied in the interacting pion matter. Two phenomenological models are used: the mean-field model and the hybrid model. Free model parameters are fixed by fitting the lattice QCD data on the pion Bose condensate density at zero . In spite of some minor differences the two model demonstrate an identical qualitative and very close quantitative behavior for the thermodynamic functions and electric charge fluctuations. A peculiar property of the considered models is an intersection of the Bose-Einstein condensation line and the line of the first order at the critical end point. Keywords: Bose-Einstein condensation, liquid-gas phase transition, pion matter

I. INTRODUCTION and charged pions). In this specific region of the (µ, T ) phase diagram the QCD matter is expected in a form of the interacting pions. The heavier hadrons and/or quark- The Bose statistics [1] and Bose-Einstein condensation gluon degrees of freedom are expected to be suppressed (BEC) phenomenon [2] were predicted almost hundred at T  m and not too large µ. years ago. The BEC can take place in equilibrium sys- Various approaches to a description of the pion matter tems of non-interacting bosons when a macroscopic part were developed: chiral perturbation theory [25, 26], lin- of all particles begins to occupy a single zero-momentum ear sigma model [27, 28], Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model [29] state. This was approximately realized experimentally in or Polyakov-loop extended quark meson model [30, 31], atomic systems at very small and particle functional renormalisation group [32, 33], hard thermal number densities [3–6]. loops [34], self-interacting mean field theory [35], etc. The BEC can also happen in condensed matter, nu- Influence of particle interactions on the thermody- clear physics, astrophysics and cosmology (see, e.g., Refs. namic properties was also considered within the S- [7–15]). In most of these situations particle interactions matrix formulation of statistical mechanics [36]. In par- should be taken into account. If both the attractive ticular, the attractive and repulsive interaction from and repulsive interactions between particles are taken hadron-hadron scatterings were discussed in a number into account the system reveals the first order liquid-gas of works [37–41]. A possibility of the BEC in the pion phase transition (FOPT) and the critical end point (CP). system with zero was also discussed Therefore, the two phenomena – BEC and CP – can be using a Skyrme-like model including both attractive and expected for interacting bosons. repulsive interaction [14, 35, 42]. Pions are three pseudo-scalar mesons, π+, π0, π−, that A description of the repulsive and attractive interac- obey the Bose statistics, thus, an emergence of the BEC tion in statistical systems of hadrons is often performed of pions is possible. The BEC can take place during the in terms of the following phenomenological approaches: cooling of the early Universe [16], in the gravitationally mean field approximation, effective mass model, excluded bound pion stars [17–19], or as a non-equilibrium phe- volume approximation, etc. The mixtures of these ap- nomenon in heavy-ion collisions [8,9, 20]. It has been proaches are also used. For example, a famous Walecka also predicted to occur at large isospin (electric) chemi- model [43] for nuclear matter describes repulsive inter- arXiv:2108.08140v2 [hep-ph] 21 Aug 2021 cal potentials [21, 22]. This suggestion has been studied actions in terms of the mean field U(n) being a linear in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), a theory of strong function of nucleon number density, and attractive in- interactions. A presence of the BEC was supported by re- teractions in terms of the effective nucleon mass. These cent first principle lattice QCD simulations [23, 24]. The different phenomenological models belong to the same Bose condensate (BC) of pions was observed at low tem- universality class, the so called “classical models” [44] perature, T < m, and large electric (isospin) chemical po- (the names mean-field models and van der Waals type tential m < µ < 2m, where m is the pion mass (in what models are also used). These classical models lead to follows we use an approximate value m = 140 MeV ne- very similar description of the FOPT and CP (see, e.g., glecting a small difference between the masses of neutral Ref. [45]). The models from the same universality class 2 for the CP can however lead to rather different conse- is the Bose momentum distribution. The particle number quences for the BEC. This was discussed in Ref. [39] densities of the ith sort of pions equals to where only the repulsive parts of interactions were taken ∞ into account. ∂p  1 Z nid(T, µ ) = id = dk k2f (T, µ ) . (4) In Ref. [46] the effective mass model with φ4 attractive i i 2 k i ∂µi T 2π and φ6 repulsive interaction was studied. It was found 0 that both phenomena, FOPT and BEC, take place. An The electric charge density is calculated as additional peculiar feature of the model was an observa- tion that the CP belongs to the line of the BEC. How do   ∂p id id these features of the pion matter depend on the specific nQ(T, µ) = = n (T, µ) − n (T, −µ) , (5) ∂µ + − model used in Ref. [46]? This question motivates the T present studies. We discuss two other phenomenological and the number density of all pions as descriptions of the pion matter. The first model considers X both attractive and repulsive interactions in terms of the nid(T, µ ) mean field U(n) depending on the pion number density. i i i=+,0,− The second ”hybrid” model treats the repulsive interac- ∞ T m2 X 1  lµ tions as the mean field, and the attractive interactions = K (lm/T ) 1 + 2 cosh , (6) in terms of the effective pion mass m∗(T, µ) < m. We 2π2 l 2 T l=1 first fit the lattice QCD data at zero temperature and finite isospin chemical potential µ to fix the model pa- where K2 is the modified Bessel function. rameters. Then, thermodynamic functions and electric The inequality |µ| ≤ m should be satisfied in the (isospin) charge fluctuations are calculated in the (µ, T ) IdPG. An onset of the BEC occurs at |µ| → m − 0. plane. Intensive measures of the electric charge fluctua- The condition nQ = nQ(T, |µ| = m) defines then a line tions, the scaled variance, skewness, and kurtosis, appear TBC = TBC(nQ) denoted further as the BEC line. Un- to be very sensitive to a presence of the CP and the BEC. der this line at T < TBC(nQ) there is a region with the The paper is organized as follows. The ideal Bose gas of nonzero BC. pions is considered in Sec.II. The two phenomenological In what follows we consider µ ≥ 0. It leads to models of the interacting pion matter are discussed and n+ ≥ n0 ≥ n− and nQ = n+ − n− ≥ 0, where n+, n0, + 0 − compared in Sec.III. Summary in Sec.IV closes the and n− denote the number densities of π , π , and π , paper. respectively. The results for µ ≤ 0 can be obtained by + − interchanging π and π . A line of the BEC TBC(nQ) for the IdPG corresponds to µ → m − 0. It is shown in 1 the (nQ,T ) plane in Fig.1 (a) . At this line there is an + II. IDEAL PION GAS onset of the π BEC. Under this line nonzero values of the π+ BC are formed. The total pion number density (6) should be then modified at T < TBC(nQ), The ideal pion gas (IdPG) is described in the grand canonical ensemble by the pressure function [47] X id + n = ni (T, µi) + nBC , (7) X i=+,0,− pid(T, µ) = pid(T, µi) i=+,0,− + + where nBC ≥ 0 corresponds to the BC of π . At T → 0 ∞ all thermal densities (4) vanish. Thus, n = n = n+ at X 1 Z k4 Q BC √ = 2 dk fk(T, µi) , (1) T = 0, i.e., at zero temperature the pion system consists 6π k2 + m2 + i=+,0,− 0 from the pure BC of π . A dashed line in Fig.1 (a) shows the BEC line for only where the chemical potential µ corresponds to the electric one sort of pions, i.e., for π+ It gives a good approxima- charge conservation, tion of the general case with all three sorts of pions. This is because of n−  n+ on the BEC line TBC(nQ). There- µ+ = µ, µ0 = 0, µ− = −µ , (2) fore, an analytic behavior of the TBC(nQ) at TBC/m  1 and

√ −1 " 2 2 ! # k + m − µ 1 f (T, µ ) = exp i − 1 , (3) In figures of the present paper we use dimensionless variables k i T with the pion mass m as the energy scale. 3

Figure 1. (a): A line of the BEC TBC for the ideal pion gas as a function of electric charge density nQ is shown by a line. A dashed line shows the same function when the π− presence is neglected. (b): Ratios of the π0 and π− number densities to + that of π in the IdPG on the BEC line as functions of TBC. corresponds approximately to the well known text book BEC line. Under this line additional contribution from + result for one sort of non-relativistic bosons [44]: nBC > 0 should be added to ωQ (10). The anomalous behavior of electric charge fluctuation happens due to 2π  n 2/3 the BEC of π+. It is rather similar to a behavior of the T (n ) =∼ Q , (8) BC Q m ζ(3/2) ideal Bose gas for one sort of particles (see Refs.[8,9]). It should be noted that the scaled variance (9) can where ζ(3/2) =∼ 2.612 is the Riemann zeta function. Cor- not be applied at µ → 0. It becomes meaningless in − rections to Eq. (8) from π are small as seen from Fig.1 this limit as hQi → 0. At hN+ − N−i = 0 the other 2 (a). Relativistic corrections to Eq. (8) at T/m ≥ 1 are fluctuation measure h(N+ − N−) i/hN+ + N−i is usually considered in Ref. [9]. used to describe the charge fluctuations.

The ratios n0/n+ and n−/n+ along the BEC line are shown in Fig.1 (b). The inequalities n+  n0  n− remain valid on the BEC also for the interacting pion III. INTERACTING PION GAS matter.

An intensive measure for fluctuations of the electric In this section, two phenomenological models for the charge Q = N+ − N− is the scaled variance repulsive and attractive interactions in the pion matter are considered. hQ2i − hQi2 ω = , (9) Q hQi

+ − where N+ and N− are the total numbers of π and π , A. Mean-field model respectively, and h...i denotes the grand canonical aver- aging. In the IdPG it takes the following form The mean-field model for the system of interacting pi-   ons is given by the following set of self-consistent equa- id T ∂nQ nid(T, µ) + nid(T, −µ) ωQ = = tions: nQ ∂µ T nQ Z ∞ n 1 2  2 2  Z 0 + dk k f (T, µ) + f (T, −µ) . (10) X ∗ 0 0 dU(n ) 2 k k p(T, µ) = pid(T, µ ) + dn n , (11) 2π nQ 0 i dn0 i=+,0,− 0 When µ = m the function fk(T, µ = m) is proportional X id ∗ + −2 R ∞ 2 2 n(T, µ) = ni (T, µi ) + nBC , (12) to k at k/m  1. The integral k dkfk (T, µ = 0 i=+,0,− m) becomes thus divergent at the lower limit as k−2. µ∗ = µ − U(n) , (13) Therefore, the scaled variance ωQ becomes infinite on the i i 4

+ Figure 2. (a): A fit of the lattice data [17, 23] of the nBC at T = 0 as a function of µ in the mean-field model. A solid line shows the results with A and B given by Eq. (20), dashed line corresponds to A = 0 when the attractive interactions are neglected, and a dotted vertical line presents the ideal pion gas results, i.e., when both A = 0 and B = 0. A green box corresponds to the µ0 and n0 values of the pion matter ground state. (b): The ratio of p to pid as functions of T for µ = 0. A solid line corresponds to the mean-field model for p with the parameters (20), a dashed line to the hybrid model discussed below. where U(n) is the mean field that describes pion inter- At small µ the system exists in the ‘gaseous’ phase with + actions, µi in Eq. (13) is given by Eq. (2), and nBC in n = 0 and p = 0. At some µ = µ0 there is the FOPT. Ac- Eq. (12) is the BC density of π+ that can attains non-zero cording to the Gibbs criteria the pion BC density jumps ∗ + values when the BEC condition, µ = m, is fulfilled. A to the ‘liquid’ phase with nBC = n0 > 0 and the pressure second term in the right hand side of Eq. (11) corresponds p = 0. This FOPT takes place at to the so called excess pressure that makes Eqs. (11)-(13) to be thermodynamically self-consistent (see, e.g., Ref. + 3A n = ≡ n0, (17) [48]). The mean-field potential U(n) will be taken in the BC 4B following form: where the liquid pressure (16) equals to zero, and the U(n) = −An + Bn2, A > 0, B > 0 , (14) chemical potential µ0 found from Eq. (15) is 2 where constants A and B correspond to the attractive 3A µ0 = m − , (18) and repulsive interactions, respectively. In the model 16B with mean field the BEC can take place at both µ < m, which defines also the ground state binding energy per for U(n) < 0, and µ > m, for U(n) > 0. For the poten- pion tial U(n) given by Eq. (14) these conditions correspond to small and large values of n, respectively. ε 3A2 W ≡ − m = − . (19) n0 16B At T = 0 the pion system can only exist in the form of + + the π BC. A condition of the BEC, µ − U(nBC) = m, + leads to the following solution for nBC:

p 2 + A + A + 4B(µ − m) nBC(T = 0, µ) = . (15) 2B + At µ > µ0 the BC nBC as a function of µ is defined by The system pressure at T = 0 is given by a second term Eq. (15). In Fig.2 (a) the fit of the Monte Carlo lattice + in the right hand side of Eq. (11): data for nBC at T = 0 with Eq. (15) is presented. The fitting parameters A and B are fixed as A + 2 2B + 3 p = − n  + n  . (16) −2 −5 2 BC 3 BC A = 0.05 m ,B = 1.30 m . (20) 5

With these parameters one finds: restrictions from above for A. In the mean-filed model the BEC line is defined by the ∼ 3 ∼ −3 n0 = 0.029 m = 0.01 fm , (21) condition µ = m+U(n). At U(n) > 0, one thus observes W =∼ −0.00036 m =∼ −0.05 MeV . (22) µ > m. The BEC line TBC(n) is approximately a universal This ground state of the pion BC looks rather rarefied function of particle number density2 and it remains the and weakly bounded when it is compared with the ground same as for the IdPG where U(n) = 0. This is valid for nuc ∼ −3 ∼ state of the nuclear matter, n0 = 0.16 fm and Wnuc = U(n) > 0 in the region with no FOPT. At A = 0 there −16 MeV. is no FOPT and the BEC line TBC(nQ) look almost the In Fig.2 (b) the ratio of the pressure of interacting same as for the IdPG shown in Fig.1 (a). A behavior of pion gas to that of the IdPG is shown by a solid line as a the electric charge fluctuations ωQ (10) is however dras- function of T at µ = 0. The effects of the repulsive inter- tically changed on the BEC line and under this line due action suppress the pion pressure, p < pid, and they are to a presence of the repulsive mean-field interactions. As seen at large T . The repulsive effects are still rather mod- will be seen below, in contrast to the IdPG, the scaled erate and correspond approximately to the excluded vol- variance ωQ becomes finite at all nQ > 0 due to the re- ume corrections with rather small hard-core pion radius pulsive interactions. r =∼ 0.13 fm. Tiny effects of the attractive interactions are The phase diagram of the interacting pion gas is shown only seen at small T where p > pid. Note that our mod- in Fig.3. For A > 0 and B > 0 the considered mean- elling concerns the non-resonance part of the pion-pion field model reveals the FOPT. The mixed phase region + is constructed by the standard Gibbs procedure: when interactions. These interactions contribute to the nBC(µ) at T = 0 presented in Fig.2 (a). At µ = 0 a contribution several solutions exist for the pressure function p at the of these non-resonance residual pion interactions to the same T and µ values, the physical solution corresponds thermodynamic functions are small. There are almost no to that with larger value of p. The line of the FOPT chances to observe them in hadron statistical equilibrium in the (µ, T ) plane corresponds to the equal pressures of models using the data on heavy ion collisions. This is gaseous small density and liquid large density solutions. because of |µ|  m in the equilibrium systems created Figures3 (a) and (b) present the phase diagram on in heavy ion collisions. Previous suggestions to observe the (nQ,T ) and (µ, T ) planes, respectively. A line of the the BEC in heavy ion collisions assumed a large values FOPT in the (µ, T ) plane starts at µ = µ0 and T = 0, and of µ ∼ m for all three types of pions due to chemical it ends at the CP T = Tc and µ = µc. The ground state non-equilibrium effects [8,9]. point and CP point for the model parameters (20) are The mean-filed model with free parameters A and B shown in Fig.3 by a green box and red star, respectively. was discussed in Ref. [35] for µ = 0. Several interest- A region of the mixed gas-liquid phase is bounded by ing phenomena including the BEC can take place in this the left and right binodal curves that are shown in Fig.3 case due to large attractive interactions, A ≥ Acr = (a). At given T < Tc the electric charge density nQ of the 2(Bm)1/2. The required large values of the parameter A pion matter inside the mixed phase is given by a linear g are however fully unrealistic ones, Acr is about 45 times combination of the gaseous phase with nQ < nQ lying l larger than the A value given by Eq. (20). These large on the left binodal, and the liquid phase with nQ > nQ values A ≥ Acr are in a strong contradiction with lattice lying on the right binodal. The right liquid binodal of + data at T = 0. the mixed state includes nBC > 0 while the conditions In contrast to µ = 0 case, at large µ =∼ m and µ > m for the BEC are not fulfilled in the left gaseous binodal. the small pion interactions are however crucially impor- A peculiar property of the model is a position of the tant. A vertical dotted line µ = m in Fig.2 (a) presents CP lying on the BEC line. This is similar to the results a behavior µ = m in the IdPG. As seen from Fig.2 of Ref. [46] and is a consequence of smallness of the at- (a) the IdPG behavior is far away from the lattice data. tractive forces in the pion matter. We checked that for A dashed line in Fig.2 (a) presents the model results at A larger than some critical value the BEC line intersects A = 0, i.e., when only repulsive interactions are included. a line of the FOPT at the T = Ttr < Tc. The both fits, with A > 0 and A = 0, are of the similar Such a behavior was found for the interacting α-matter quality with χ2/ dof =∼ 2. This fact means a dominant in Ref. [7]. role of the repulsive interactions. The lattice data at We introduce the quantities (i = +, 0, −) T = 0 presented in Fig.2 (a) can not give indisputable estimates of the parameter A. Similar conclusions were made in Ref. [46]. The lattice data shown in Fig.2 (a) defines the value 2 This is an exact result for one sort of bosons in the mean-filed of parameter B rather accurately, but give only some model (see, e.g. Ref. [7]). 6

0.1

0.075

0.05

0.025

0

Figure 3. (a) The phase diagram of the pion matter in the mean-field model with parameters (20) on the (nQ,T ) plane. The left and right binodals are shown by solid lines, the BEC line by dashed line. A green box denotes a ground state with nQ = n0 and T = 0, and a red star denotes the CP with Tc =∼ 0.21 m. (b): The same as in (a), but for the (µ, T ) plane.

FOPT line and the BEC line. When T → Tc along the Z ∞ BEC line the first term in the right hand side of Eq.(25) 1 2 2 ∗ goes to infinity, and, thus, the second finite term gives a wi = 1 + 2 dk k fk (T, µi ) , (23) 2π nQ 0 negligible contribution to ωQ. A relative contribution of this second term increases monotonously with increasing id that are equal to the scaled variances of the IdPG ωi , T (n ) along the BEC line. It still remains small for ∗ BC Q but with shifted chemical potentials µi → µi . One finds the discussed region of the system temperature. an explicit expression for ωQ (see the Appendix): ∼ ∼ Note that w0 = 1, w− = 1, and n0 < n+, n−  n+.   T ∂nQ n+w+ + n−w− At Tc < TBC(n) < 0.8 m the relative contributions to ωQ = = ωQ (25) from each terms, n0w0/nQ and 4n−w−/nQ, are nQ ∂µ T nQ 2 smaller than 3%. Neglecting these small contributions to 1 (dU/dn)(n+w+ − n−w−) − , (24) ωQ one obtains an expression nQ T + (dU/dn)(n+w+ + n−w− + n0w0) where n ≡ nid(T, µ∗). i i i  −1 Approaching the BEC line, i.e., at µ∗ → m − 0, the ∼ T dU + ωQ = . (26) wi values demonstrate the following behavior: w+ → ∞ n+ dn+ while both w0 and w− remain finite. This leads to the result on the BEC line: It corresponds to the mean-field model result for one par- ticle species n = n+ (see, e.g., Ref. [39]).  −1 T dU n0w0 + 4n−w− ωQ = + . (25) At the CP, dU/dn = 0 and ωQ according to (25) goes nQ dn nQ to infinity. For U(n) given by Eq. (14) the condition dU/dn = 0 gives the pion number density n = n and If A = 0 the value of dU/dn is always positive at n > c the chemical potential µ = µ at the CP: 0. Thus, in contrast to the IdPG, the scaled variance c ωQ on the BEC line becomes finite due to the repulsive A A2 A2 interactions. This conclusion remains also valid for A > 0 nc = , µc = m − = µ0 − . (27) 2B 4B 16B at TBC(nQ) > Tc where dU/dn > 0. It can be also shown that the scaled variance ωQ is continuous across the BEC The critical temperature is calculated numerically as ∼ ∼ line. Tc = 0.21 m = 24 MeV. At the CP one also finds For A > 0 the CP becomes the end point of both the n+.  n0 and n+  n−. Therefore, the electric charge 7

200

100

50

10

1 0

Figure 4. The scaled variance ωQ on (µ, T ) plane. The lines, green box and red star symbols are the same as in Fig.3. density at the CP is approximately interacting pions instead of Fermi statistics for interact- ing nucleons. There are also some technical differences. c ∼ 2 For example, we consider quadratic repulsive mean filed n = nc = n0 . (28) Q 3 Bn2 instead of the linear function of the nucleon num- ber density in Walecka model. The considered model for A behavior of ω on the (µ, T ) plane is shown in Fig.4. Q interacting pion matter will be called the hybrid model, Approaching the CP by any path, one observes ω → ∞. Q and it is defined by the following equations: At nQ > 0 this is the only point on the phase diagram with infinite value of the scaled variance ωQ. Most in- teresting regions of the phase diagram are µ =∼ m and µ > m. These are regions of the FOPT and the BEC. For these two phenomena both the repulsive and attrac- tive interactions between pions play a crucial role. X 2 (m − m∗)2 p = p (T, µ∗; m∗) + B n3 − , (29) id i 3 2A i=+,0,− B. Hybrid model X ∗ ∗ + n = nid(T, µi ; m ) + nBC , (30) i=+,0,− Another phenomenological model considered in our pa- µ∗ = µ − Bn2 , m∗ = m − An , (31) per is constructed by combining the two frameworks: i i s 2 the mean-field U(n) = Bn to describe the repulsive where the scalar density interactions (the same as in the mean-filed model con- ∗ Z ∞ 2 sidered in the previous subsection) and effective pion m k dk X ∗ ∗ + ∗ ns = √ fk(T, µ ; m ) + n . mass m (T, µ) < m for attractive ones. It resembles the 2 2 ∗2 i BC 2π 0 k + m Walecka model [43] for the symmetric nuclear matter. i=+,0,− A principal difference however is the Bose statistics for (32) 8

1

0.998

0.996

0.994

Figure 5. (a): BEC and FOPT lines in the mean-field and hybrid models on the (T, µ) plane are shown as functions of µ.A dotted line presents the pure repulsive interaction (A = 0) when the FOPT is absent. (b): The m∗/m ratio on the (µ, T ) plane.

At T = 0 one obtains: the mean-field potential −An:

A 2 2B 3 2 2 +  +  p ∗ k k p = − nBC + nBC , (33) (m∗)2 + k2 =∼ m + =∼ m − An + (36) 2 3 2m∗ 2m µ∗ = µ − B(n+ )2 , (34) ∗ 2 BC (m − m ) ∼ 1 2 ∗ + ∗ ∗ = An . (37) m = m − AnBC, µ = m . (35) 2A 2

Equations (33)-(35) give the functions µ = µ(n+ ) and Nevertheless some differences between these two models BC can be found. For example, the ratio of the pressure p = p(n+ ) that are identical to the corresponding ex- BC function in the hybrid model to pressure of the IdPG pressions for the mean-field model with U(n) given by at µ = 0 is shown as a function of T by a dashed line (14) and considered in the previous subsections. There- in Fig.1 (b). The two models with the same A and B fore, these two models are identical at T = 0, and free parameters lead to different p = p(T ) functions. model parameters of the hybrid model will be taken as in Eq. (20). At T > 0 the models are not identical. How- ever, all conclusions concerning the FOPT and BEC are the same for the both models. Even more, the numerical values of Tc and µc in the hybrid model are also approx- C. Fluctuations of higher orders imately equal to those in the mean-field model. This is shown in Fig.5 (a). Because of these reasons we do Electric (isospin) charge susceptibilities χj in the grand not present nQ(T, µ) and ωQ(T, µ) for the hybrid model. canonical ensemble defined as (j = 1, 2,...): These results are very similar to those in Figs.2 and3 for the mean-field model. ∂j(p/T 4) χ = . (38) j ∂(µ/T )j

The ratio m∗/m is shown on the (µ, T ) plane for the Susceptibilities are derivatives of the thermodynamic po- hybrid model with parameters (20) in Fig.5 (b). This tential and give, therefore, additional important informa- ratio is slightly smaller than unity, but rather close to tion of the . Particularly their values it. This corresponds to the small attractive effects in the are very sensitive to both the CP and BEC phenomena. hybrid model. In a non-relativistic approximation one Some ratios of the susceptibilities (38) are well known and ∼ finds ns = n and observes a straightforward correspon- used to quantify the fluctuations of conserved charges. dence of the effective mass m∗ to the attractive part of Most familiar of these measures are the scaled variance 9

300 100 105 25

4 0 10

-25 103 -100 -300 102 0

Figure 6. The skewness (a) and kurtosis (b) in the hybrid model (see text for details).

ω, skewness Sσ, and kurtosis κσ2 (see, e.g., Ref. [49]): plane. This is in contrast to the universal behavior of fluctuations in the Ising model, as well as in various phe- χ χ χ ω = 2 , Sσ = 3 , κσ2 = 4 . (39) nomenological model calculations (see, e.g., Ref. [35] and χ1 χ2 χ2 references therein), where negative values of κσ2 are ob- served in the so-called analytic crossover region above the In this subsection the results for Sσ and κσ2 are pre- critical temperature. The large but finite values of the sented within the hybrid model with parameters (20). kurtosis are generally obtained in a vicinity of the BEC These fluctuation measures are presented in Figs.6 (a) line with a discontinuity to smaller values on the FOPT and (b), respectively. The results of the mean-field model and BEC line at increasing µ. The singular behavior with are essentially the same. At small chemical potential κσ2 → ∞ takes place at the CP. The values of the kur- µ  m and not too large T the pion densities are small. tosis remain large with κσ2  1 even far away from the In this case both the pion interaction and Bose statistics CP. This is due to a large sensitivity of the higher order effects can be neglected. It gives Sσ =∼ 1 and κσ2 =∼ 1 fluctuations to the CP. that corresponds to the ideal classical gas limit. Both these measure strongly deviate from these baseline val- ∼ ues of the ideal Boltzmann gas at µ = m and µ > m. IV. SUMMARY This is due to a presence of the FOPT and the BEC effects, respectively. Thermodynamic properties of the interacting pion Skewness. The skewness Sσ is presented in Fig.6 matter are studied in the two phenomenological mod- (a). This measure attains both positive and negative val- els: the mean-field model with the potential U(n) and ues on the (µ, T ) plane. The positive values correspond the hybrid model. The potential is chosen as a function + 2 to those regions of the phase diagram where nBC = 0. of the pion number density U(n) = −An + Bn , and it The skewness Sσ has a discontinuity along the BEC line includes both the repulsive Bn2 and attractive −An in- and jumps to negative values in the phase with the BC teractions, respectively. The hybrid model assumes the + 2 nBC > 0. At the CP, Sσ shows the singular behavior: it same repulsive mean-field potential Bn , while the at- can go to both −∞ and +∞ depending on the path of tractive interactions are described by the effective mass approaching to the CP. When crossing the FOPT there is with the excess pressure −(m−m∗)2/(2A) similar to that a discontinuity of Sσ from positive values in the gaseous in the Walecka model for interacting nucleons [43]. Model phase to the negative ones in the liquid phase. parameters A > 0 and B > 0 are fixed by fitting the lat- Kurtosis. The kurtosis κσ2 in the (µ, T ) plane is tice QCD data on the BC pion density at T = 0 as a shown in Fig.6 (b). The considered models demon- function of the chemical potential µ. At zero tempera- strate only positive values κσ2 > 0 for the whole (µ, T ) ture, the both considered model become identical to each 10 other. Thus, the fitting procedure at T = 0 leads to the finite and continuous function. The only point of anoma- same set (20) of the A and B parameters. The two phe- lous electric charge fluctuations is the CP. At the CP both 2 nomena – the BEC and the FOPT with the CP – take the scaled variance ωQ → ∞ and kurtosis κσ → ∞. The place in the pion matter. In spite of some minor differ- skewness Sσ has a more complicated behavior. It can go ences the two model demonstrate an identical qualitative to both +∞ and −∞ depending on the way of approach- and very close quantitative behavior for the thermody- ing the CP. A special feature of the considered models is namic functions and electric charge fluctuations in the an absence of negative values of the kurtosis. The neg- whole (µ, T ) plane. Note that the qualitative features ative values κσ2 < 0 are usually happen in a crossover found in these two models are also in agreement with the region near the CP. These negative values are absent in results obtained in Ref. [46]. the considered models of the pion matter. This is be- The interaction parameters A and B (20) found from cause of the fact that two phenomena – an onset of the fitting the lattice data correspond to rather moderate in- BEC and the CP – takes place at the same point. teractions in the pion matter. At µ = 0 these interactions Both the FOPT and BEC are mainly defined by π+ are completely unimportant in the pion . mesons. A presence of π− and π0 mesons give only mod- It should be emphasized that the mesonic resonances as erate numerical corrections and does not change the qual- a part of the pion-pion interactions are not included in itative properties of the pion matter at µ =∼ m and µ > m. our consideration. The residual non-resonance pion-pion interactions are however crucially important at µ =∼ m and µ > m. If A > 0 and B > 0 the both models demonstrate ∼ the FOPT with a position of the CP at µc = m and ∼ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Tc = 24 MeV. The BEC line merges to the CP. At T < Tc only the + liquid (dense) pion phase includes the BC nBC > 0, while The authors thank L. Satarov, H. Stoecker, and + nBC = 0 in the gaseous (rarefied) phase. V. Vovchenko for fruitful comments and discussions. This In the ideal pion gas, the scaled variance of electric work is supported by the National Academy of Sciences charge fluctuations becomes infinite on the BEC line and of Ukraine, Grant No. 0121U112254. O.S.S. acknowl- under this line. In contrast to this ideal gas behavior, edges the support from National Research Foundation of a presence of the repulsive interactions makes ωQ to be Ukraine (project No. 2020.02/0073).

Appendix A: Derivation of Eq. (24)

In the Appendix we present a proof of Eq. (24). In the mean-field model the pion chemical potentials can be written as The derivative ∂nQ/∂µ can be calculated as ∂n ∂µ∗ T Q = (n w − w n ) + 2w n . (A1) ∂µ + + − − ∂µ − − One then finds ∂µ∗ 1 dU  ∂µ∗  = 1 − (n w + n w + n w ) − n w − 2n w , (A2) ∂µ T dn + + 0 0 − − ∂µ 0 0 − − and thus ∂µ∗ (dU/dn)(n w − n w ) = 1 − + + − − . (A3) ∂µ T + (dU/(dn)(n+w+ + n0w0 + n−w−)

Substituting ∂µ∗/∂µ in Eq. (A1) from (A3) one obtains Eq. (24). 11

[1] S. N. Bose, Zeitschrift f¨urPhysik 26, 178 (1924). (2020), arXiv:2010.13655 [hep-ph]. [2] A. Einstein, Kgl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss 1 (1925). [27] J. O. Andersen, Physical Review D 75 (2007), [3] M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. 10.1103/physrevd.75.065011. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Science 269, 198 (1995). [28] J. O. Andersen and T. Brauner, Phys. Rev. D 78, 014030 [4] K. B. Davis, M. O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van (2008), arXiv:0804.4604 [hep-ph]. Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, [29] L. He, M. Jin, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 71, 116001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3969 (1995). (2005). [5] C. C. Bradley, C. A. Sackett, J. J. Tollett, and R. G. [30] P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, Phys. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1687 (1995). Rev. D 98, 074016 (2018). [6] F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, [31] . Folkestad and J. O. Andersen, Physical Review D 99 Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999). (2019), 10.1103/physrevd.99.054006. [7] L. M. Satarov, M. I. Gorenstein, A. Motornenko, [32] K. Kamikado, N. Strodthoff, L. von Smekal, and V. Vovchenko, I. N. Mishustin, and H. Stoecker, Journal J. Wambach, Physics Letters B 718, 1044 (2013). of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 44, 125102 [33] E. E. Svanes and J. O. Andersen, Nuclear Physics A 857, (2017). 16 (2011). [8] V. V. Begun and M. I. Gorenstein, Phys. Lett. B653, [34] J. O. Andersen, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa, and M. Strick- 190 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611043 [hep-ph]. land, Physical Review D 93 (2016), 10.1103/phys- [9] V. V. Begun and M. I. Gorenstein, Phys. Rev. C77, revd.93.054045. 064903 (2008), arXiv:0802.3349 [hep-ph]. [35] O. S. Stashko, D. V. Anchishkin, O. V. Savchuk, and [10] G. C. Strinati, P. Pieri, G. Rpke, P. Schuck, and M. Ur- M. I. Gorenstein, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Par- ban, Physics Reports 738, 176 (2018). ticle Physics 48, 055106 (2021). [11] P. Nozieres and S. Schmitt-Rink, J. Low. Temp. Phys. [36] R. Dashen, S.-K. Ma, and H. J. Bernstein, Phys. Rev. 59, 195 (1985). 187, 345 (1969). [12] Y. Funaki, T. Yamada, H. Horiuchi, G. R¨opke, P. Schuck, [37] R. Venugopalan and M. Prakash, Nucl. Phys. A 546, 718 and A. Tohsaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 082502 (2008). (1992). [13] P.-H. Chavanis and T. Harko, Phys. Rev. D86, 064011 [38] W. Broniowski, F. Giacosa, and V. Begun, Phys. Rev. (2012), arXiv:1108.3986 [astro-ph.SR]. C 92, 034905 (2015), arXiv:1506.01260 [nucl-th]. [14] I. Mishustin, D. Anchishkin, L. Satarov, O. Stashko, [39] O. Savchuk, Y. Bondar, O. Stashko, R. V. Poberezhnyuk, and H. Stoecker, Phys. Rev. C 100, 022201 (2019), V. Vovchenko, M. I. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, Phys. arXiv:1905.09567 [nucl-th]. Rev. C 102, 035202 (2020). [15] L. E. Padilla, J. A. V´azquez,T. Matos, and G. Germ´an, [40] C. Fernndez-Ramrez, P. M. Lo, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019, Rev. C 98, 044910 (2018), arXiv:1806.02177 [hep-ph]. 056 (2019). [41] A. Dash, S. Samanta, and B. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. C [16] V. Vovchenko, B. B. Brandt, F. Cuteri, G. Endrdi, F. Ha- 99, 044919 (2019), arXiv:1806.02117 [hep-ph]. jkarim, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Physical Review Letters [42] D. Anchishkin, I. Mishustin, and H. Stoecker, Journal 126 (2021), 10.1103/physrevlett.126.012701. of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 46, 035002 [17] B. B. Brandt, G. Endrodi, and S. Schmalzbauer, EPJ (2019). Web Conf. 175, 07020 (2018), arXiv:1709.10487 [hep-lat]. [43] J. D. Walecka, Annals Phys. 83, 491 (1974). [18] M. Mannarelli, Particles 2, 411443 (2019). [44] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics [19] J. O. Andersen and P. Kneschke, arXiv e-prints , (Pergamon, Oxford, 1975). arXiv:1807.08951 (2018), arXiv:1807.08951 [hep-ph]. [45] R. Poberezhnyuk, V. Vovchenko, D. Anchishkin, and [20] V. Begun and W. Florkowski, Physical Review C 91 M. Gorenstein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 26, 1750061 (2017), (2015), 10.1103/physrevc.91.054909. arXiv:1708.05605 [nucl-th]. [21] D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, [46] O. S. Stashko, O. V. Savchuk, R. V. Poberezhnyuk, 592 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0005225 [hep-ph]. V. Vovchenko, and M. I. Gorenstein, Phys. Rev. C 103, [22] H. Abuki, T. Brauner, and H. J. Warringa, Eur. Phys. 065201 (2021). J. C 64, 123 (2009), arXiv:0901.2477 [hep-ph]. [47] W. Greiner, L. Neise, and H. St¨ocker, Thermodynamics [23] B. B. Brandt, G. Endrodi, and S. Schmalzbauer, Phys. and statistical mechanics (Springer Science & Business Rev. D97, 054514 (2018), arXiv:1712.08190 [hep-lat]. Media, 2012). [24] B. B. Brandt, G. Endrodi, E. S. Fraga, M. Hippert, [48] D. Anchishkin and V. Vovchenko, Journal of Physics G: J. Schaffner-Bielich, and S. Schmalzbauer, Phys. Rev. Nuclear and Particle Physics 42, 105102 (2015). D98, 094510 (2018), arXiv:1802.06685 [hep-ph]. [49] F. Karsch and K. Redlich, Physics Letters B 695, 136142 [25] P. Adhikari and J. O. Andersen, Phys. Lett. B 804, (2011). 135352 (2020), arXiv:1909.01131 [hep-ph]. [26] P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and M. A. Mojahed,