DOCSLIB.ORG

Migration and Development in Slovakia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COMMON HOME PUBLICATION MIGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN SLOVAKIA Silvia Letavajová, Boris Divinský COMMON HOME series Mgr. Silvia Letavajová, PhD., Faculty of Arts of UKF in Nitra RNDr. Boris Divinský, independent expert in the field of international migration with support of Katarína Marinová and Miroslav Janák (Caritas Slovakia). This publication is part of MIND (Migration. Interconnectedness. Development), a 3-year project financed by the European Commission (DG DEVCO). The aim is to raise public awareness on the relation between sustainable development and migration and the European Union’s role in development cooperation. Led by Caritas Austria, the partners of the MIND project are: Caritas Bavaria (Germany), Caritas International Belgium, Caritas Bulgaria, Caritas Czech Republic, Caritas Europa, Caritas Italy, Cordaid (Caritas Netherlands), Caritas Portugal, Caritas Slovakia, Caritas Slovenia and Caritas Sweden. For more information about MIND follow the campaign: Authors: Mgr. Silvia Letavajová, PhD. a RNDr. Boris Divinský. Reviewers: Prof. PhDr. Jaroslav Čukan, CSc., doc. PhDr. Radoslav Štefančík, MPol., Doc. PhDr. Magdaléna Paríková, CSc. Contributions and editing by Olga Kadysheva, Patrick Taran, and Piyasiri Wickramasekara (Global Migration Policy Associates - GMPA) and Davide Gnes and Shannon Pfohman (Caritas Europa). This publication was proofread by Mauricio Ruiz and Richard Tuffs. Language correction: Marta Glossová. Text editors: Marta Glossová, Boris Divinský. Graphic design by Vanden Broele Group with the support of Leticia Lozano (Caritas Europa). Layout by Kateřina Novotná. Cover illustration by Jean Bernard Boulnois. Pictures in pubication showing the community of Iraqian refugees are from archive of integration project of Slovak NGO Pokoj a dobro. Print: Faxcopy.as, 64 pages. Printed volume: 200 pcs. Published by Caritas Slovakia, Kapitulská 18, 814 15 Bratislava, May 2019. © Caritas Slovakia, Silvia Letavajová and Boris Divinský This publication was produced in the framework of the MIND project, which has received financial support from the DEAR Programme of the European Union. The information contained in this publication does not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the European Union. Caritas reserves the right to not be held responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in this publication. Liability claims regarding damage caused by the use of any information provided, including any information which is incomplete or incorrect, will therefore be rejected. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 7.1.2 Lack of access to education or business FOREWORD 5 opportunities 35 7.1.3 Lack of safe and legal pathways, CHAPTER 2 lack of access to or exclusion from EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 the refugee system and protection 37 CHAPTER 3 7.1.4 Adverse public opinion 37 THE COMMON HOME VISION AND VALUES; MIGRATION, 7.2 Country of origin 38 DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS 9 7.2.1 Escape from conflict and persecution due 3.1 Migration 10 to political, ethnic or religious differences 38 3.2 Development 10 7.2.2 Employment/Economic reasons 39 3.3 Migration and development 11 7.2.3 Socio-political reasons 39 CHAPTER 4 7.2.4 Political-military activities in the countries NATIONAL INTRODUCTION 13 of origin of refugees and migrants 39 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 8 THE NATIONAL MIGRATORY CONTEXT 15 OPPORTUNITIES FOR FACILITATING AND ENHANCING 5.1 Emigration 15 MIGRANTS' CONTRIBUTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT 41 5.2 Slovak diaspora 16 8.1 Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development 5.3 Immigration 16 Goals (SDGs) 41 8.2 National policies, practices and responses CHAPTER 6 that facilitate migrant contributions 42 REALITY ON THE GROUND: HOW MIGRANTS AND MIGRATION 8.2.1 National polices, practices and responses CONTRIBUTE TO DEVELOPMENT 21 that could facilitate migrant contributions 6.1 Towards places of residence/destination/transit 21 in all spheres of social life 42 6.1.1 Participation in the labour market 8.2.2 Profile and attitude of government and productive employment 21 policies and practices on international 6.1.2 Participation in business activity 24 development cooperation, humanitarian 6.1.3 Contribution to welfare system and assistance, and responses to sudden to sustaining viable national social surge of migrants and refugees 43 security systems 25 8.3 Promising national / transnational practices 6.1.4 Contribution to economic, social, cultural, on development from grassroots / CSOs and political development 26 / diaspora organisations 44 6.1.5 Immigrant / diaspora organisational 8.3.1 Examples of promising practices at local, presence and contribution 28 national or transnational level 45 6.2 Towards place of origin and shared responsibility 29 8.3.2 Examples of promising CSO involvement 46 6.2.1 Social and economic remittances 29 6.2.2 Contribution of migrant diaspora CHAPTER 9 and organisations 30 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 9.1 Conclusions 49 CHAPTER 7 9.2 Recommendations 51 OBSTACLES THAT IMPEDE MIGRANTS' FULL CONTRIBUTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT 33 REFERENCES 55 7.1 Country of residence / destination / transit 33 List of interviewed persons 62 7.1.1 Lack of protection and respect for and List of abbreviations 63 enforcement of human and labour rights 33 CHAPTER 1 FOREWORD igration is a phenomenon that has permanently Migrants come to Slovakia, either because they are forced Minfluenced the history of mankind, and it has at to do so by unfavourable circumstances, or because they some point affected the lives of every one of us. Over the last want to acquire new knowledge and opportunities in three centuries, Slovakia has experienced higher emigration another country. But thanks to their presence we have an than immigration. Slovaks who left to find better work opportunity to express and share our values, and at the same opportunities or fled totalitarian regimes have contributed time we are challenged to relate to and to accept different to building a better society in their countries of residence experiences, different world views and different capabilities. and developed capabilities they probably could not have achieved had they stayed at home. We like talking about Admittedly, so far, we have not seriously taken up this successful Slovak emigrants/Slovaks abroad, and are proud challenge. Compared to other European countries, there of their achievements. Slovakia welcomes their return home are fewer foreigners in Slovakia – at the end of 2018, to apply their new experience in Slovakia. foreign citizens with a permit to stay in the country amounted to 2.2% of its population. Thus, only a few After Slovakia’s accession to the European Union in 2004 Slovaks have a neighbour, friend or colleague with an and to the Schengen Area in 2007, Slovakia has become immigrant background. Moreover, we easily succumb to a more attractive country for foreigners. We are not just simplifications as public opinion does not differentiate well a transit country anymore but also a destination country between reliable information and fake news. That is why, in that offers interesting job opportunities. Therefore, it is such a context, it is more important than ever to rely on the high time to change the way we look at migration and knowledge and expertise of experts who understand and realise that people coming to Slovakia seek a better life capture the issues in all their complexity. and share an interest in developing our country, just like Slovaks going abroad. If we give them the means to develop The Common Home research is based on an extensive set their own competencies they will contribute, not only to of data and an in-depth analysis covering migration and the well-being of Slovak society, but also to that of their development. It describes the way migrants contribute to country of origin. the development of our society, not only from an economic point of view, but also culturally, socially and politically, In Slovakia, the current public discourse on migration whether as individuals or as groups and organisations. The ignores the fact that foreigners can contribute to the research also identifies the obstacles that weaken migrants’ development of our country. The topic of migration has capacity to become development actors and draws a set of evoked fears and debates that mostly focus on potential conclusions and recommendations that can help us create risks but do not reflect on any of the possible benefits. our “Common Home”. The recommendations specifically According to the Eurobarometer survey in autumn 2018, examine how to provide migrants with an opportunity to as many as 81% of Slovak citizens hold more or less negative participate in societal life, as well as on how to positively feelings on immigration from non-EU countries. link migration to sustainable development. This publication assumes that the creation of “Common Home” is a two- On the one hand, it is understandable to be more cautious way process that involves the participation not only of about people we are not familiar with, but on the other, immigrants themselves but also of society as a whole. new developments may open up opportunities we cannot now anticipate. 5 The MIND project was launched in 2017. MIND, which stands for Migration. Interconnectedness. Development, is a three-year European Caritas project supported by the European Commission. It includes Caritas organisations in 11 EU countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden as along with the regional secretariat of Caritas
Recommended publications

  • Evolution of the Product Space and a New Proposal

    EVOLUTION OF THE PRODUCT SPACE AND A NEW PROPOSAL FOR TURKEY’S EXPORT INCENTIVE SYSTEM OF THE PRODUCT SPACE EVOLUTION EVOLUTION OF THE PRODUCT SPACE AND A NEW PROPOSAL FOR TURKEY’S EXPORT INCENTIVE SYSTEM 768 759 736 737 .tr 755 431 620 728 v 622 407 623 606 607 149 748 764 462 621 625 713 o 632 619 154 767 750 649 618 409 715 758 309 459 517 689 717 735 646 648 653 143 664 752 386 747 497 645 613 647 403 457 615 633 630 396 585 628 612 515 608 204 458 642 357 397 144 662 616 644 554 663 712 .sbb.g 513 617 400 762 766 46 421 629 402 643 w 417 390 751 652 631 761 398 710 520 126 412 540 654 401 410 395 716 720 391 239 708 627 498 121 685 711 703 641 650 256 359 120 383 763 415 371 ww 774 241 704 315 320 80 702 592 624 151 452 249 705 701 240 424 706 734 638 155 456 388 509 399 427 351 756 611 634 700 519 657 454 697 709 635 559 148 698 753 66 426 444 745 147 731 521 692 651 558 423 694 312 416 602 81 695 699 524 157 36 392 358 422 723 729 60 54 746 508 406 85 209 690 730 605 345 86 610 523 437 688 696 205 356 573 434 514 707 203 64 442 510 255 455 348 420 350 77 30 555 570 291 361 404 393 394 201 535 460 73 389 343 118 556 156 347 639 116 71 346 26 757 577 448 575 760 614 687 296 693 362129 349 145 65 586 669 342 772 25 574 3 355 344 101 539 224 353 405 714 79 461 564 438 259 182 742 600 329 289 170 482 372 317 674 518 50 31 557 512 670 70 88 593 661 10 56 471 146 130 691 680 321 52 516 732 326 214 479 413 686 445 579 352 55 199 228 626 484 102 29 576 83 316 583 447 104 215 159 235 322 451 136 572 328 360 604 494 446 449 430 103 542 63
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration

    CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration

    CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Published within the project Cultural Heritage in Migration. Models of Consolidation and Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Communities Abroad funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund © Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova, Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova, editors, 2017 © Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum – BAS, 2017 © Paradigma Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-954-326-332-5 BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND FOLKLORE STUDIES WITH ETHNOGRAPHIC MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Edited by Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova Paradigma Sofia • 2017 CONTENTS EDITORIAL............................................................................................................................9 PART I: CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A PROCESS DISPLACEMENT – REPLACEMENT. REAL AND INTERNALIZED GEOGRAPHY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MIGRATION............................................21 Slobodan Dan Paich THE RUSSIAN-LIPOVANS IN ITALY: PRESERVING CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE IN MIGRATION.............................................................41 Nina Vlaskina CLASS AND RELIGION IN THE SHAPING OF TRADITION AMONG THE ISTANBUL-BASED ORTHODOX BULGARIANS...............................55 Magdalena Elchinova REPRESENTATIONS OF ‘COMPATRIOTISM’. THE SLOVAK DIASPORA POLITICS AS A TOOL FOR BUILDING AND CULTIVATING DIASPORA.............72 Natália Blahová FOLKLORE AS HERITAGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIANS IN HUNGARY.......................................................................................................................88
  • Post-Socialist Diaspora Policies: Is There a Central-European Diaspora Policy Path?1

    Post-Socialist Diaspora Policies: Is There a Central-European Diaspora Policy Path?1

    Eszter Kovács Post-Socialist Diaspora Policies: Is There a Central-European Diaspora Policy Path?1 Abstract: The paper raises the question whether there is a certain diaspora policy model that is typical for Central European states. Based on the findings, the paper argues that although post-socialist states have very similar paths in relating to and engaging their diaspora communi- ties abroad, these policies are shaped by diverse political contexts, considerations, and expecta- tions, as well as by different experiences in the diaspora – homeland relations. More specifically, the research identifies four points where a detailed qualitative analysis points out differences in these states’ diaspora policies behind the similar structures: the effects of special/benefit/status laws, the politicization of external voting rights, the symbolic aspects of diaspora policy, and the level of awareness of the new (post-2000, labor migrant) diaspora. Diaspora politics, engagement practices, and homeland – diaspora relations have been acquiring increasing attention within diaspora studies. In recent years, there has been a proliferation of theoretical approaches on diaspora policy typologies, both from deduc- tive and from inductive perspectives.2 This paper attempts to contribute to the existing scholarly work on diaspora policy models, by offering critical evaluation on diaspora policy models in the Central European context. The paper raises the question whether there is a certain diaspora policy model or type that is typical for all the Central Euro- pean states. Based on the findings, the paper argues that although post-socialist states have very similar paths in relating to and engaging their diaspora communities abroad, these policies are shaped by diverse political contexts, considerations, and expectations, as well as by different experiences in the diaspora – homeland relations.
  • Slovak Challengers 2017

    Slovak Challengers 2017

    In partnership with Produced by and Table of contents 6 Foreword 8 About 10 Executive summary and key insights 12 Chapter 1: About this report 16 Chapter 2: A helicopter overview 24 Chapter 3: TOP 15 Slovak Scale-ups 34 Chapter 4: Conclusions 36 Chapter 5: Company profiles 46 References Author: Jaroslav Leitmann Co-authors: Michal Laco, Petra Lipnická, Peter Kolesár, Adela Zábražná Graphic design: Studio 436 4 5 Much of what Neulogy does is about connections, the creation of meaningful links between the right people. From bridging Slovak diaspora with communities back home to fostering cooperation between academics and entrepreneurs, our team has a rich portfolio of connections and partnerships formed. As of September this year, we have extended our net- work and joined forces with EIT Digital. After a decade at the epicenter of innovation activities in Slovakia, this partnership marks a significant milestone for Neulogy, as well as the ecosystem that has evolved dramati- cally over the years. One of the most indicative proofs of these transformations are the annual Startup Awards that we have been organizing since 2011. The number and quality of appli- cants increase every year, as does the audience of innovation scouts and supporters. Similarly, this study in itself demonstrates that there is no shortage of world-class innovative companies from Slovakia. As success usually generates more success, we have to take Foreword advantage of these favorable circumstances and assist Slovak innovators to scale their businesses even faster. EIT Digital, being the most extensive European network of investors, can help accelerate the growth of many of these emerging compa- nies.
  • Identity, Integration, and Citizenship in Post-Communist Ethnic Kin Policies

    Identity, Integration, and Citizenship in Post-Communist Ethnic Kin Policies

    Identity, Integration, and Citizenship in Post-Communist Ethnic Kin Policies Alexandra Sarlo Working Draft 5 February 2015 Since the 1990s, at least 11 post-communist states have created laws granting special recognition to ethnic kin abroad. These “compatriot” policies – to borrow a term commonly used in some of these states to refer to ethnic kin, whether citizens or not – provide legal recognition and some form of benefits to people who can prove their ethnic or national origin from a particular state, or in some cases origin from territory that state once held. This recognition is sometimes referred to as “external quasi-citizenship.”1 The benefits from these policies include some of the civil, economic, and social rights of citizenship such as preferential access to education, less burdensome visa requirements for work or visits than other foreigners receive, or fast-track options for gaining citizenship. They also include programs for the preservation and promotion of languages and cultural practices in ethnic kin communities living abroad. They do not include political rights of citizenship, such as the right to vote or run for office.2 My core perspective on these policies is developed from Brubaker’s notion of “groupness as an event,” that is, that the creation of identity and ethnic or national categories, is a dynamic project.3 Recognition bestowed on populations outside the state’s borders belongs to what Varadarajan conceptualizes as the “domestic abroad,” the extension of the state and its categorization of society into the international arena.4 In the post-communist cases that I examine, compatriot laws are rooted in the notion that 1 Wiebke Sievers, “A Call to Kinship? Citizenship and Migration in the New Member States and the Accession Countries of the EU,” in Rainer Bauböck, et al, eds.
  • Mining Conflicts and Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala

    Mining Conflicts and Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala

    Mining Conflicts and Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala 1 Introduction I Mining Conflicts and Indigenous Indigenous and Conflicts Mining in Guatemala Peoples Author: Joris van de Sandt September 2009 This report has been commissioned by the Amsterdam University Law Faculty and financed by Cordaid, The Hague. Academic supervision by Prof. André J. Hoekema ([email protected]) Guatemala Country Report prepared for the study: Environmental degradation, natural resources and violent conflict in indigenous habitats in ­Kalimantan-Indonesia, Bayaka-Central African Republic and San Marcos-Guatemala Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to all those who gave me the possibility to complete this study. Most of all, I am indebted to the people and communities of the Altiplano Occidental, especially those of Sipacapa and San Miguel Ixtahuacán, for their courtesy and trusting me with their experiences. In particular I should mention: Manuel Ambrocio; Francisco Bámaca; Margarita Bamaca; Crisanta Fernández; Rubén Feliciano; Andrés García (Alcaldía Indígena de Totonicapán); Padre Erik Gruloos; Ciriaco Juárez; Javier de León; Aníbal López; Aniceto López; Rolando López; Santiago López; Susana López; Gustavo Mérida; Isabel Mérida; Lázaro Pérez; Marcos Pérez; Antonio Tema; Delfino Tema; Juan Tema; Mario Tema; and Timoteo Velásquez. Also, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to the team of COPAE and the Pastoral Social of the Diocese of San Marcos for introducing me to the theme and their work. I especially thank: Marco Vinicio López; Roberto Marani; Udiel Miranda; Fausto Valiente; Sander Otten; Johanna van Strien; and Ruth Tánchez, for their help and friendship. I am also thankful to Msg. Álvaro Ramazzini.
  • Annualreport11.Pdf

    Annualreport11.Pdf

    Caritas Internationalis Annual Report 2011 Caritas Internationalis is a global confederation of 164 Catholic organisations under the umbrella of the Holy See, which responds to humanitarian disasters, promotes integral human development and lobbies on the causes of poverty and violence. Inspired by Christian faith and gospel values, Caritas works in most of the world’s countries with the poor and oppressed, vulnerable and excluded, regardless of race or religion. It promotes just and fraternal societies where the dignity of every human being is enhanced. Depending on the size of the Catholic community and the will of their bishops’ conference, Caritas national members range from small entities to some of the world’s largest social, humanitarian and development organisations. Combined, they have over a million staff and volunteers. Caritas Internationalis has a General Secretariat in Rome, which coordinates the confederation’s response to major humanitarian emergencies, supports members and advocates on their behalf for a better world, based on justice, compassion and fraternity. Caritas Internationalis also has delegations in New York and Geneva representing the confederation at the United Nations. The Caritas delegations work with other international institutions and nongovernmental organisations and in close association with the Permanent Missions of the Holy See. Caritas Internationalis is made up of seven regions: Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, the Middle East and North Africa, North America and Oceania. 2 Caritas Internationalis Annual Report 2011 Contents 4 One Human Family, Zero Poverty By Cardinal Óscar Rodríguez Maradiaga, President 5 Introduction By Michel Roy, Secretary General 6 60th anniversary and the General Assembly: Caritas looking back, moving forward 10 Emergencies: Compassion in action 18 Advocacy: A voice for change 24 Building the confederation 26 Summary of Emergency Appeals 2011 30 Financial information Front Cover: Caritas supports a water project in this Kenyan South Sudan becomes village after a independent.
  • Programme of Side-Events at the 2021 HLPF

    Programme of Side-Events at the 2021 HLPF

    Tentative Programme of Side-events * FINAL (15 July 2021) Time Organization Title of event <Tuesday, 6 July 2021> 0730-0900 The Permanent Mission of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg The importance of rehabilitation for achieving SDG3: Challenges and best practices to to the UN (Geneva) access quality rehabilitation services and inclusive health systems. 0730-0900 The Permanent Mission of Timor Leste to the UN As governance crises worsen COVID-19 impact, is SDG 16 key for recovery? 0730-0900 The Permanent Mission of Honduras to the UN and Leave No One Behind: Building resilience in communities Brooke 0730-0900 The Permanent Mission of the Slovak Republic to the UN The importance of SDG Target 4.7 for a just and sustainable future in post COVID era 0730-0900 The Permanent Mission of Austria to the UN Circular Economy as a holistic means to accelerate the implementation of SDG 12 and SDG 13 0730-0900 Government of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Driving more effective adaptation to climate impacts through inclusive, locally-led action Northern Ireland in partnership with the Government of Egypt and the UN High-level Champions 0730-0900 Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Light Industry of Mongolia Sustainable pastoralism and rangelands: impacts of COVID, and how not to leave them behind in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 0730-0900 UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Coping with environmental challenges: climate and biodiversity action in UNESCO’s sites (UNESCO) 0730-0900 UN Office for Project Services (UNOPS)
  • FACING DISASTERS, BUILDING RESILIENCE Acacia Water Acacia CARE

    FACING DISASTERS, BUILDING RESILIENCE Acacia Water Acacia CARE

    » PORTFOLIO MAY 2016 FACING DISASTERS, BUILDING RESILIENCE Acacia Water Acacia CARE. ACT. SHARE. LIKE CORDAID. Photo Disasters hit the poorest the hardest. h ey often live in the most dangerous locations and are most susceptible to natural disasters, such as fl oods or droughts. h ey are also the ones who will have to leave behind their homes, jobs and farmland when fl eeing from acts of war. Often they do not have anything or anyone to fall back on. Disasters destroy investments of years and obstruct further development. h is means that the most eff ective disaster response demands synergy between humanitarian aid, disaster risk reduction, and sustainable development. Cordaid ‘s mission is to build l ourishing communities. Most of our interventions are centred around CMDRR and a Cordaid believes that disaster resilience is a key characteristic (combination of) specii c themes, which are: of l ourishing communities. ▪ Food security / Agriculture / Livestock ▪ Water resources management Resilience is the ability of a system, community or society ▪ Livelihoods and economic recovery exposed to hazards to resist, absorb, accommodate to and ▪ Ecosystem management and climate change adaptation recover from the ef ects of a hazard in a timely and ei cient ▪ Governance, Lobby and Advocacy manner, including through the preservation and restoration of its essential basic structures and functions. Resilience We currently focus on mainstreaming DRR at district and means the ability to “resile from” or “spring back (bounce municipality level in line with national DRR policies and are back) from” a shock. h e resilience of a community in piloting the concept of urban resilience in Asia and Africa.
  • Standardization and Measurement Services in Turkey

    Standardization and Measurement Services in Turkey

    NAT'L INST. OF STAND & TECH NI8T PUBLICATIONS REFERENCE AlllDb 7El'lb3 NBSIR 73-172 Standardization and liHeasurement Services in Turkey A Report of a National Bureau of Standards/Agency for International Development Survey Conducted October 14-28, 1972 A Report of a Survey Conducted jointly by the National Bureau of Standards and the Agency for International Development. October 14-28, 1972 QC /oO U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS NBSIR 73-172 STANDARDIZATION AND MEASUREMENT SERVICES IN TURKEY (A Report of an National Bureau of Standards/Agency for International Development Survey Conducted October 14-28, 1972) Survey Team Director: Professor Dr. Tarik G. Somer, President, Turkish Standards Institution Survey Team Members: William E. Andrus, National Bureau of Standards, USA Robert J. Corruccini, National Bureau of Standards, USA Raul Estrada, Ecuadorean Institute of Standards, Ecuador Velid Isfendiyar, Turkish Standards Institution, Turkey Jeong, Byong Sik, Bureau of Standards, Korea Sanford B. Newman, National Bureau of Standards, USA H. Steffen Peiser, National Bureau of Standards, USA Charoen Vashrangsi, Department of Science, Thailand (as observer) H. Thomas Yolken, National Bureau of Standards, USA M. Fuat Yucesoy, Turkish Standards Institution, Turkey This survey was conducted as a part of the program under the US/NBS/Agency for International Development, PASA TA(CE)5-71. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Frederick B. Dent. Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Richard W. Roberts, Director ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The encouragement, planning assistance and generous financial support from the U.S. Agency of International Development, U.S. Department of State are gratefully acknowledged. In addition the Team sincerely thanks the numerous unnamed government, industry and university colleagues in Turkey who gave freely of their time and advice to assist the Survey, Dr.
  • Push and Pull Factors of International Migration: a Comparative Report

    Push and Pull Factors of International Migration: a Comparative Report

    2000 EDITION Push and pull factors of international migration A comparative report THEME 1 EUROPEAN General COMMISSION 1statistics A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000 ISBN 92-828-9721-4 © European Communities, 2000 Printed in Luxembourg PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER FOREWORD International migration flows have increased in magnitude and complexity over the past decades. As a result, migration and potential migration to, for instance, the European Union are receiving ever more attention at policy level. Within this context, the Commission of the European Communities entrusted Eurostat, its Statistical Bureau, and the Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI) with a project to study the push and pull factors determining international migration flows. The objective of the study is to improve our understanding of the direct and indirect causes and mechanisms of international migration to the European Union, from an internationally comparative perspective. The results are intended to serve as a basis for the development of policy instruments and to provide tools for estimating future migration. The project started in 1994 with the preparation of a study on the ‘state of the art’ in migration theory and research, the identification of national and international research institutes active in this field, and a workshop. Based on the results of this preparatory stage, surveys were set up in a number of countries.
  • Norfolk Azalea Festival Queens

    Norfolk Azalea Festival Queens

    Norfolk Azalea Festival Queens YEAR COUNTRY QUEEN 1954 United States Patricia Ann Priest, daughter of Treasurer of the US, Mrs. Ivy Baker Priest 1955 United States Olivia Barbour Twining, daughter of Gen. Nathan F. Twining, Chief of Staff, US Air Force 1956 United States Nell Eastland, daughter of Sen. James O. Eastland, Mississippi 1957 United Lady Carey Coke, daughter of Fifth Earl Leicester, Thomas William Kingdom Edward Coke 1958 United States Patricia Jane Lemay, daughter of Vice Chief of Staff, US Air Force, Curtis E. Lemay 1959 United States Bonnie Ruth Buchanan, daughter of State Dept. Chief of Protocol, Wiley Buchanan 1960 United States Paula Layton Pace, daughter of former Secretary of the Army, Frank Pace 1961 United States Lynda Bird Johnson, daughter of US Vice President Lyndon Baines Johnson 1962 United States Margaret Anne (Peggy) Goldwater, daughter of Sen. Barry Goldwater 1963 United States Verita Korth, daughter of former Sec. of the Navy Fred Korth 1964 United States Gene Zuckert, daughter of Sec. of the Air Force Eugene M. Zuckert 1965 United States Luci Baines Johnson, daughter of US President Lyndon Baines Johnson 1966 Norway Kari Borten, daughter of Prime Minister Per Borten 1967 Belgium Monique Van Den Boeynants, daughter of Prime Minister Paul Van Den Boeynants 1968 Netherlands Cari Luns, daughter of Joseph M.A.H. Luns, Foreign Minister of the Netherlands Norfolk Public Library Norfolk Azalea Festival Queens 1969 United States Tricia Nixon, daughter of President Richard M. Nixon 1970 West Ulrike Ahlers, daughter of the State Secretary of the Federal Republic of Germany Germany, Conrad Ahlers 1971 United Sarah Rippon, daughter of The Honorable Geoffrey Rippon, Chancellor of Kingdom the Duchy of Lancaster (NOTE: Arabella Spencer Churchill, grand-daughter of Sir Winston Churchill, was the original selection for Azalea Queen in 1971.