Florida State University Libraries
Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School
2015 Synthesis and Characterization of Superconducting Ferropnictide Bulks and Wires Jeremy Weiss
Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY
THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SUPERCONDUCTING FERROPNICTIDE
BULKS AND WIRES
By
JEREMY WEISS
A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2015 Jeremy Weiss defended this dissertation on April 9, 2015. The members of the supervisory committee were:
Eric Hellstrom Professor Directing Dissertation
Gregory Boebinger University Representative
David Larbalestier Committee Member
Theo Siegrist Committee Member
Per Arne Rikvold Committee Member
The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements.
ii
This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of Professor James Brooks who served on this dissertation advisory committee until his passing in Fall 2014
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Firstly, I would like to thank David Larbalestier for giving me the undergraduate opportunity to do the preliminary lab work that sparked an interest in applied research and ultimately lead to the following dissertation. To vaguely paraphrase the first toast of his I heard; an observation relevant to my developing career: “We never could have guessed that we would have ended up here, but we stumble through life as opportunities present themselves and it really is fascinating how it seems to work out for us.” It was David who introduced me to Jianyi Jiang who mentored me for two and a half years as an undergraduate. Jianyi showed an unfounded amount of patience as I learned to succeed (and fail) at research, was always willing to answer any question I brought him, taught me almost everything I know about electromagnetic characterization, and gave me the freedom to explore new techniques and procedures. I owe a lot of gratitude to Eric Hellstrom who mentored me as a graduate student. Eric taught me the most important skills I now possess including the ability to communicate effectively. With his help I have come from being a mess when presenting to winning multiple best presentation awards. I want to thank Bill Starch for purchasing, fixing, training, and managing of all things technical. When I first came to the ASC, I coveted Bill’s technically demanding job, and within a couple of years he trusted me enough to attempt almost any task I dared to take on, but there is only one Bill Starch. I’d like to thank the many scientists at ASC that have provided support. Chiara Tarantini provided many thoughtful discussions about fundamental theory and experimental techniques. Anitolii Polanskii, Fumitake Kametani, Dmytro (Dima) Abraimov, Van Griffin, and Akiyasu Yamamoto shared their characterization expertise and support. Ashleigh Francis, Muriel Hannion, Ben Hainsey, Ross Richardson, Matthieu Dalban-Canassy, Julian Velasquez, Jeff Whalen, Tiglet Basara, and Michael Santos all provided much needed technical support. Connie Linville and Charlotte Hall both went above and beyond when it came to providing wonderful administrative support. Jorge González, José Moreno, Marcos Corchado, and Gerardo Nazario were all National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored research experience for undergraduate students whom I mentored over the summers on unique projects.
I’d like to acknowledge the special opportunities I was awarded over the years, enabled by Eric Hellstrom and David Larbalestier, including financial support to attend summer schools funded by the Institute for Complex Adaptive Matter (ICAM), the National High Magnetic Field
iv
(NHMFL) Laboratory, and the FSU Research Foundation. I would also like to acknowledge supplemental financial support to attend conferences from the American Ceramic Society, and the NHMFL. I am grateful to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Council on Superconductivity for awarding me a fellowship, without which ensuing unmanageable credit card debt was sure to become an extra burden. Last, and certainly not least, this work was supported by NSF DMR-1306785, NSF DMR-1006584, by the NHMFL which is supported by the NSF under NSF/DMR-0084173 and NSF DMR-1157490, and by the State of Florida. Work at the Atominstitut has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): 22837-N20 and the European-Japanese collaborative project SuperIron (No. 283204). Atom- probe tomography measurements were performed at the Northwestern University Center for Atom-Probe Tomography (NUCAPT) and the LEAP tomograph was purchased and upgraded with funding from the NSF-MRI (DMR 0420532) and ONR-DURIP (N00014-0400798, N00014-0610539, N00014-0910781) programs. NUCAPT is a Shared Facility of the Materials Research Center of Northwestern University, supported by the National Science Foundation's MRSEC program (DMR-1121262). We are also grateful to the Initiative for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern for upgrading NUCAPT’s capabilities. The work at the University of Tokyo was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO.
I’d also like to individually acknowledge the members of my supervisory committee for their input, expertise, and guidance. Theo Siegrist taught me much about crystallography and a bit about interfacing with machines older than myself. Steven Van Sciver taught me everything I know about cryogenic and magnet design, and it was a great pity he was not available to see this dissertation through to the end. I’d like to thank Per Arne Rikvold for happily agreeing to serve on this committee. James Brooks was an exemplary role model for what every scientist and educator should be. He took on more work than anybody should while maintaining his trademark sense of humor about it. It was a tragedy to see him go, but I am thankful to have known him and am fortunate Greg Boebinger was willing to take his place on this committee.
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables ...... x List of Figures ...... xi List of Symbols, Acronyms, and their Meanings ...... xvii Abstract ...... xx 1 - Introduction ...... 1 1.1 – Background ...... 2
1.2 – Parallels Between FBS and Cuprates ...... 5
1.3 – Current Transport in Bulk Ferropnictides ...... 6
1.4 – Characteristic Lengths in Type-II Superconductors ...... 8
1.5 – Bean’s Critical State Model ...... 10
2 - Experimental Techniques ...... 11 2.1 – Introduction ...... 11
2.2 – Safety Considerations ...... 11
2.3 – Synthesis Techniques ...... 12
2.3.1 – Ambient pressure solid-state synthesis ...... 12
2.3.2 – Mechanochemical synthesis...... 13
2.3.3 – Hot isostatic pressing ...... 13
2.3.4 – Wire fabrication ...... 14
2.3.5 – Large bulk fabrication ...... 14
2.4 – Electromagnetic Characterization ...... 16
2.4.1 – SQUID magnetometry ...... 16
2.4.2 – M vs T measurements ...... 16
2.4.3 – Trapped remanent field measurements ...... 17
2.4.4 – VSM magnetometry ...... 19
2.4.5 – M vs. H measurements ...... 20
vi
2.4.6 – Physical property measurements...... 21
2.4.7 – R vs. (T, H) measurements ...... 21
2.4.8 – Ic vs. H measurements ...... 22
2.4.9 – Magneto optical imaging (MOI) ...... 23
2.5 – Microstructural Characterization ...... 23
2.5.1 – Optical imaging ...... 23
2.5.2 – Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) ...... 24
2.5.3 – X-ray diffractometry (XRD) ...... 24
2.5.4 – Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) ...... 25
2.6 – Nanostructural Characterization ...... 25
2.6.1 – Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) ...... 25
2.6.2 – Atom probe tomography (APT) ...... 25
3 - Mechanochemical Synthesis of Pnictide Compounds ...... 27 3.1 – Introduction ...... 27
3.2 – Experimental Details ...... 29
3.3 – Results ...... 31
3.4 – Discussion ...... 35
3.5 – Conclusions ...... 37
4 - High Intergranular Current Density in Fine Grain Ferropnictides ...... 38 4.1 – Introduction ...... 38
4.2 – Experimental Details ...... 39
4.3 – Results ...... 41
4.4 – Discussion ...... 46
5 - Dependence of K-doped BaFe2As2 Superconducting Properties on Sintering Temperature in Wires and Tapes ...... 49 5.1 – Introduction ...... 49
vii
5.2 – Experimental Details ...... 50
5.3 – Results ...... 50
5.4 – Discussion ...... 55
5.5 – Conclusions ...... 56
6 - Understanding Weak Links in Co and K-doped BaFe2As2 ...... 57 6.1 – Introduction ...... 57
6.2 – Experimental Details ...... 58
6.3 – Results and Discussion ...... 59
6.3.1 – The chemistry of grain boundaries ...... 59
6.3.2 –Intergranular vs intragranular magnetization ...... 60
6.3.3 – Percolation of current paths ...... 63
6.3.4 – Irreversible intergranular critical current density in applied fields ...... 64
6.4 – Conclusions ...... 66
7 - Evidence for Composition Variation and Impurity Segregation at Grain Boundaries in High Current Density Polycrystalline K- and Co-doped BaFe2As2 Superconductors ...... 67 7.1 – Introduction ...... 68
7.2 – Experimental Details ...... 69
7.3 – Results and Discussion ...... 70
7.4 – Conclusions ...... 76
8 - Demonstration of an Iron-Pnictide Bulk Superconducting Magnet Trapping Over 1T ...... 77 8.1 – Introduction ...... 77
8.2 – Experimental Details ...... 78
8.3 – Results ...... 79
8.4 – Discussion ...... 83
8.5 – Conclusions ...... 86
9 - Exploration of Paths Toward Higher Critical Current Densities in K-doped BaFe2As2 Polycrystals ...... 87
viii
9.1 – Introduction ...... 87
9.2 – Experimental Details ...... 88
9.3 – Results ...... 89
9.4 – Discussion ...... 92
9.5 – Conclusions ...... 94
Appendix A - Processing Iron Based Superconductors Safely ...... 95 Appendix B - Integrated Safety Management Plan ...... 98 Appendix C - Production of Multifilamentry K-doped Wires ...... 100 Appendix D - Copyright Permission Letter ...... 103 References ...... 105 Biographical Sketch ...... 119
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 - Material properties of superconducting bulks...... 32
Table 7.1 - Nominal and APT measured compositions of bulk Ba122 samples (at.%) ...... 71
Table 7.2 - Nominal and APT measured compositions inside crystallites (grains) within Ba122 samples (at.%) ...... 71
Table 8.1- Comparison of superconducting and mechanical properties for YBCO, MgB2 and K-doped Ba122 ...... 85
Table 9.1 – Superconducting properties of samples measured ...... 92
x
LIST OF FIGURES
BGB Figure 1.1 - Dependence of the critical current density across GBs Jc as a function of 14 16 the [001] tilt misorientation angle for Co-doped BaFe2As2, P-doped BaFe2As2, and YBCO.17 ...... 4
Figure 1.2 - Upper critical field as a function of temperature for various superconductors.18 ...... 4
Figure 1.3 – Optical image taken under polarized light (left) of a polycrystalline Ba(Fe0.9Co0.1)2As2 bulk sample and the corresponding magneto optical image (right) taken after Zero-field cooling and applying a magnetic field of 100 mT at 7 K...... 6
Figure 2.1 – Remanent magnetic moment as a function of maximum applied field for two Bi-2223 flat wires before bending and after bending to suppress the contribution of local local mR . Dashed line represents bent wire mR subtracted from the unbent wire mR. Schematic in top left corner shows the hysteretic nature of self-field Jc as a function of maximum applied field. Data taken from ref.54 ...... 19
Figure 2.2 - Schematic of atomic probe microscopy setup. Arrows indicate the direction of evaporated ions...... 26
Figure 3.1 - SEM image of BaFe2As2 made by hand grinding Fe, Ba3As2, and As followed by HIP treatment at 1120 °C. The image shows voids and Fe2As that wets grain boundaries...... 28
Figure 3.2 - Milling vial temperature as a function of milling time for three different MSR reactions. The baseline was obtained by milling fully-reacted BaFe2As2 powder...... 30
Figure 3.3 - (a) XRD pattern of milled 0.6 Ba + 0.4 K + 2 Fe + 2 As powder before MSR. XRD pattern and SEM image of (b) milled powder after MSR showing that Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 had formed, (c) after the 1120 °C HIP heat treatment of MSR powder, (d) after the 600 °C AP heat treatment of MSR powder, and (e) after the second 600 °C HIP heat treatment of the MSR powder...... 31
Figure 3.4 - Temperature dependence of the volumetric susceptibility under zero field cooling (ZFC) in an external field of 20 Oe for (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2 samples 1120 ° C HIP, 600 ° C AP, and 600 ° C HIP...... 32
xi
Figure 3.5 - Magneto optical images showing flux penetration after zero-field-cooling (ZFC) the sample to 10 K and applying the magnetic field shown in the images, for samples (a) 1120 ° C HIP, (c) 600 ° C AP, and (e) 600 ° C HIP. (b), (d), and (f) are magneto-optical images of the remanent magnetic flux after the field was removed. These correspond to (a), (c), and (e), respectively...... 33
Figure 3.6 - Magnetic field dependence of the critical current density calculated from magnetization measurements at 4.2, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 K for samples (a) 600 ° C AP, and (b) 600 ° C HIP...... 34
Figure 4.1 - Volumetric magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature for K-doped Ba122 wire and bulk. The magnetic response was evaluated by warming above Tc after zero field cooling to 5 K and applying a field of 2 mT parallel to the sample’s length...... 40
Figure 4.2 - Resistivity measurements of K-doped Ba122 bulk material. (a) Temperature dependence of resistance at different magnetic fields up to 35 T. The trend of resistivity with respect to applied field is very similar to that of K-doped single crystals , even though our bulk is untextured. It has ρ(300 K & 39 K) = (0.48 mΩcm & 0.07 mΩcm) compared to ρ(300 K & 39 K) = (0.6 mΩcm & 0.05-0.12 mΩcm) for single crystals REF, indicating that the normal-state properties are not being degraded by the presence of grain boundaries. Inset is 0 T resistivity up to 300K and RRR is ρ(300 K) divided by ρ(39 K).
(b) Hc2(T) defined at 90% (H90), 50% (H50) and 10% (H10) resistance...... 41
Figure 4.3 - Upper critical field as a function of temperature. (a) Hc2(T) defined at 90% resistance for the K-doped Ba122 bulk compared to an optimally doped single crystal 2 22 from reference, a Nb3Sn wire from reference, and a textured MgB2 thin film from reference81 with H applied parallel (closed symbols) and orthogonal (open symbols) to its 2 surface. The dotted line is a rescaled fit from reference to guide the eye. (b) Hc2 and temperature normalized by Tc to show close agreement between bulk polycrystal and single crystal with H//ab...... 42
Figure 4.4 - Microstructures of K-doped Ba122 bulk investigated by TEM. (a) TEM image of polycrystalline bulk K-doped Ba122 material showing several equiaxed grains with average grain diameter of ~200 nm. Inset is a selected area electron diffraction image of a that indicates that the grains of the material are randomly oriented with many high-angle grain boundaries. (b) HRTEM image of a typical K-doped Ba122 grain boundary where the TEM sample was tilted so the electron beam was almost parallel to the GB plane. The lattice fringes of upper and bottom grains meet at the grain boundary without an amorphous contrast, indicating the grain boundary is clean without a wetting impurity phase...... 43
xii
Figure 4.5 - Powder X-ray diffraction of K-doped Ba-122 bulk material. Small FeAs peaks can be seen from the impurity phase that occupies less than 3% of the sample volume without significantly blocking current...... 43
Figure 4.6 - Microstructure of K-doped Ba-122 bulk and wire investigated by SEM. (a) SEM image of polycrystalline bulk K-doped Ba-122 material showing non grain-wetting FeAs impurity phase. (b) SEM image of the K-doped Ba-122 wire’s superconducting cross section showing non grain-wetting FeAs impurity phase. FeAs phase accounts for less than 3% of the cross sectional area by image analysis in both bulk and wire...... 44
Figure 4.7 - Microstructure of Co-doped Ba122 wire investigated by TEM. TEM image of polycrystalline bulk Co-doped Ba122 material showing equiaxed grains with average grain diameter less than 200 nm. Inset is a selected area electron diffraction image that indicates the grains of the material are randomly oriented with many high-angle grain boundaries. TEM confirms the Co-doped wire is structurally comparable to the K-doped wire with many well connected grains...... 44
Figure 4.8 - Optical and Magneto-optical images of a K-doped Ba122 wire cross section with magnetic fields applied perpendicular to the shown cross section. (a) Optical image of the wire cross section showing superconducting core surrounded by Ag and Cu sheath. (b) Magneto-optical image of trapped magnetic flux in the wire field-cooled (FC) to 7 K in an external magnetic field of 120 mT...... 45
Figure 4.9 - Magneto-optical images of a rectangular piece of K-doped Ba122 bulk material with magnetic fields applied perpendicular to plain of the sample (thickness = 0.7 mm). (a) Magneto-optical image of partial flux penetration after zero-field-cooling (ZFC) the sample to 6 K and applying a magnetic field of 120 mT. (b) Magneto-optical image of trapped magnetic flux in a sample field-cooled (FC) to 6 K in an external magnetic field of 120 mT. (c) Magneto-optical image of trapped magnetic flux in a sample FC to 32 K in an external magnetic field of 120 mT. (d) Current stream lines calculated for c that illustrate the uniform current distribution that circulates inside the bulk even near Tc...... 46
transport magnetization Figure 4.10 - Jc (symbols) and Jc (solid lines) as a function of applied magnetic field at 4.2 K for the K-doped wire compared to other round, untextured, Fe- based superconducting wires. Sm1111 wire is from reference45 and FeSe wire is from reference.82 Inset is an SEM image of the K-doped mono-core wire showing the round cross section with Ag and Cu sheaths...... 47
Figure 4.11 - I-V curves for the Ba122 wires at different fields. (a) K-doped Ba122 wire measured in fields up 15 T. (b) Co-doped Ba122 wire measured in fields up to 5 T. The Co-doped wire was made by the same PIT process used for the K-doped wire. Voltage
xiii
response was measured at 4.2 K on a 4 cm pieces of wire with voltage taps approximately 1 cm apart. Measurements were made with increasing current...... 47
Figure 5.1 - Remanent magnetization at 0 T applied field as a function of maximum applied field for (a) wires and (c) tapes. Derivative of data in a and c is presented in (b) and (d) respectively...... 51
Figure 5.2 – Normalized moment as a function of temperature for K-doped Ba122 (a) wires and (b) tapes heat treated at various temperatures. The magnetic response was evaluated by warming above Tc after zero field cooling to 5 K and applying a field of 2 mT parallel to the sample’s length. (c) Tc as a function of heat treatment temperature for onset wires and tapes defined at the onset of diamagnetism (Tc ), 0.1 normalized moment 10% 90% (Tc ), and 0.9 normalized moment (Tc ). (d) Global critical current density at 5 K in self-field as a function of heat treatment for wires and tapes. Inset is global critical current density as a function of inverse grain size for the wires...... 53
Figure 5.3 – Scanning electron microscope images of cleaved superconductor wire cores heat treated at various temperatures as indicated in top left corner of images. Inset in top left image is an optical microscopy image of a polished cross section heat treated at 900 ºC...... 54
Figure 6.1- (a) Normalized Tc as a function of doping level to show the sensitivity of Tc 104–106 to doping level. (b) Normalized moment as a function of T/Tc after zero-field- cooling, applying a small magnetic field, and warming above Tc for round PIT wires with similar grain size...... 60
Figure 6.2 - Remanent magnetization (MR) as a function of increasing maximum applied magnetic field (Hmax) at 5 K for (a) Co-doped Ba122 bulks and (b) K-doped Ba122 bulks sintered at different heat treatment temperatures. Insets are the derivatives of the remanent magnetization as a function of the maximum applied field. Solid arrows indicate location of Hp1 for each sample and hollow arrows indicate location of Hp2 for each sample...... 61
Figure 6.3 - Remanent magnetization (MR) as a function of increasing maximum applied magnetic field (Hmax) at 5 K for powders of the sample heat treated at 600 °C ground to different powder sizes as indicated...... 62
global Figure 6.4 – Jc at self-field for K-doped bulk samples as a function of heat treatment calculated from Hp1 from remanent magnetization MR(Hmax) data and ΔM from magnetization hysteresis M(Happ) data...... 63
xiv
Figure 6.5 – Transport critical current density as a function of magnetic field applied perpendicular and parallel to a wire. Arrows indicate increasing and decreasing applied fields. Schematic of grains and field lines (indicated by arrow arrays) with respect to current (I) and the Lorentz force (F) for the two Ic(Hμ0) measurements...... 64
Figure 6.6 – Magnetic moment as a function of applied field for several different maximum applied fields of a piece of bulk K-doped BaFe2As2 heat treated at 600 °C. Inset is an expanded view of the area indicated by the dashed box...... 65
Figure 7.1 - Magnetic response of (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2, (Ba0.4K0.6)Fe2As2, and Ba(Fe0.92Co0.08)2As2 superconductors: (a) volumetric magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature after Zero Field Cooling (ZFC) to 5 K, applying 2 mT, and warming the sample; (b) Critical current density (Jc) as a function of applied magnetic field calculated from magnetization measurements at 4.2 K...... 70
Figure 7.2 - A 3-D atom-probe tomographic reconstruction of: (a) (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2; (b) (Ba0.4K0.6)Fe2As2; and (c) Ba(Fe0.92Co0.08)2As2 superconductors. Oxygen atoms are in blue and Ba atoms are in orange, other elements are excluded for a clear display of grain boundary segregation. Each dot represents a single atom, but not to scale...... 72
Figure 7.3 - A 3-D atom-probe tomographic reconstruction of: (a) (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2; (b) (Ba0.4K0.6)Fe2As2; and (c), (d) Ba(Fe0.92Co0.08)2As2 superconductors. Oxygen atoms are in blue and Ba atoms are in orange, other elements are excluded for a clear display of grain boundary segregation. Each dot represents a single atom, but not to scale ...... 74
Figure 8.1 - (a) Light microscopy image of a polished surface of the disk-shaped K- doped Ba122 bulk sample (10 mm diameter and 3.7 mm thick). (b), (c) Remanent (Happ = 0) magneto optical images at (b) 11 K and (c) 20 K for the sample field-cooled under 120 mT. The images show macroscopically uniform trapped field gradient at the perimeter. The white contrast in (b) and (c) corresponds to a high flux density perpendicular to the sample surface...... 80
Figure 8.2 - Trapped field as a function of increasing temperature for the bulk sample stack that was field-cooled magnetized at 5 K. Simplified schematic of sample and Hall probe arrangement...... 80
Figure 8.3 - Magnetic hysteresis loop obtained at 5 K. The sample was zero-field cooled to 5 K and the flux density inside the sample stack (at H2) was recorded as a function of increasing and decreasing external field. The inset shows that the hysteresis loop remains open beyond our maximum applied field of 8 T...... 81
xv
Figure 8.4 - Trapped magnetic field magnet creep at H2. (a) Time dependence of trapped field at 5 K. (b) Normalized magnetic field creep as a function of time at 5, 10, and 20 K...... 82
Figure 8.5 - Comparison between K-doped Ba122 and MgB2. (a) Critical current density 42 138 137 vs. applied magnetic field for Ba122, undoped MgB2, and C-doped MgB2 bulks. Dotted lines are extrapolated data. (b) Maximum trapped field vs. radius for K-doped Ba122 and MgB2 polycrystalline bulks calculated from the data in (a) for an infinite thickness cylinder...... 84
Figure 9.1 – Magnetic response of K-doped BaFe2As2 with extra K additions. (a) Volumetric susceptibility as a function of increasing temperature after zero field and then applying 2 mT. (b) Bulk magnetization critical current density as a function of applied field...... 90
Figure 9.2 – Magnetic response of K-doped BaFe2As2 samples with optimal and over- doping of K. (a) Volumetric susceptibility as a function of increasing temperature after zero field and then applying 2 mT. (b) Bulk magnetization critical current density as a function of applied field...... 90
Figure 9.3 – Magnetic response of K-doped BaFe2As2 samples with addition of other dopants. (a) Volumetric susceptibility as a function of increasing temperature after zero field and then applying 2 mT. (b) Bulk magnetization critical current density as a function of applied field...... 91
Figure 9.4 – Magnetic response of K-doped BaFe2As2 samples with impurity additions. (a) Volumetric susceptibility as a function of increasing temperature (b) Bulk magnetization critical current density as a function of applied field...... 91
Figure C.1 – Images of transverse cross section of various wires with different filament counts and sizes...... 100
Figure C.2 – Volumetric susceptibility of K-doped BaFe2As2 wires with various filament counts as a function of increasing temperature after cooling in zero field and then applying 2 mT...... 101
Figure C.3 – (left) Transport critical current density as a function of applied field and (right) corresponding n-values calculated from the I-V curves...... 101
xvi
LIST OF SYMBOLS, ACRONYMS, AND THEIR MEANINGS a Arbritrary length or constant e The charge of an electron,
A Vector potential, Ec Critical electric field Energy dispersive x-ray A Geometrical factor EDS 0 spectroscopy a0 Lattice parameter F Free energy AC Alternating current FBS Iron based superconductor AE Alkaline earth FIB Focused-ion beam (Alkaline earth)Fe As AE122 2 2 F Normal state free energy compound n0 AP Ambient pressure FP Pinning force APT Atom probe tomography FSU Florida state university American society of ASME GB Grain boundary mechanical engineers at. Atomic GE General electric company Standard atmosphere (unit of atm GM General motors company pressure) Arbitrary length or constant or b H Magnetic field local flux density B Magnetic flux density ħ Reduced Planck’s constant
Ba122 BaFe2As2 h The local magnetic field Bardeen, Cooper, and BCS H// Parallel magnetic field Schrieffer ┴ Bi-2212 Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 H Perpendicular magnetic field
10 Hc2 defined at intercept of ρ Bi-2223 Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+x H and 10% of ρ above Tc H defined at intercept of ρ Btrapped Trapped magnetic flux density H50 c2 and 50% of ρ above Tc
90 Hc2 defined at intercept of ρ Bx Local magnetic field profile H and 90% of ρ above Tc
C Arbitrary length or constant Happ Applied magnetic field c Arbitrary length or constant Hc1 Lower critical magnetic field
CIP Cold isostatic press Hc2 Upper critical magnetic field Critical grain boundary Co122 Ba(Fe Co ) As H 1-x x 2 2 GB matching magnetic field D Demagnetization factor HIP Hot isostatic press d Diameter Hirr Irreversibility magnetic field Maximum applied magnetic E Electric field H max field
xvii
H at peak in derivative of max Magnetic property Hp1 remanent magnetization due MPMS global measurement system to MR
Hmax at peak in derivative of Hp1 remanent magnetization due mR Remanent magnetic moment local to MR
HV Vickers hardness MR Remanent magnetization Global (intergranular) I Current m global R remanent magnetic moment Global (intergranular) I Critical current M global c R remanent magnetization Local (intragranular) ID Inner diameter m local R remanent magnetic moment Local (intragranular) j Current density M local R remanent magnetization Grain boundary critical JcBGB MSDS Material safety data sheet current density Intergranular critical current Mechanically activated, self- J bulk MSR c density sustaining reaction Grain boundary critical J gb n n-value c current density Intergranular critical current National high magnetic field J global NHMFL c density laboratory Critical current density Charge carrier number J magnetization derived from magnetization n c p density measurments Critical current density transport Jc derived from transport NSF National science foundation measurments K122 (Ba1-xKx)Fe2As2 nv Flux vortex number density
KC Fracture toughness OD Outer diameter Transition energy of an Occupational safety and K electron going from 2p OSHA α1 3/2 health administration orbital to 1s orbital LED Light emitting diode P Loading force Low temperature laser LTLSM P Power scanning microscopy m Magnetic moment or mass PIT Powder in tube MO Magneto optical PLD Pulsed laser deposition Personal protective MOI Magneto optical imaging PPE equipment
xviii r Radius wt. Weight R Resistance x Arbitrary length or constant RE Rare earth XRD X-ray diffraction (Rare earth)FeAsO RE-1111 1-x y Arbitrary length or constent compound REBCO Rare-earth barium cuprate YBCO YBa2Cu3O7-x SDW Spin density wave z Atomic number SEM Scanning electron microscopy ZFC Zero field cooled SF Self field α Arbitrary coefficient
Sm1111 SmFeAsO1-x β Arbitrary coefficient Superconducting quantum SQUID γ Anisotropy interface device
Sr122 SrFe2As2 θ Arbitrary angle 001 tilt grain boundary STO SrTiO θ 3 GB misorientation angle T Temperature κ Ginzburg-Landau parameter, critical temperature Tc (superconducting transition λ Penetration depth temperature)
Tc taken at 10% of the 10 Tc normalized diamagnetic μ0 Permeability of free space moment Tc taken at 90% of the 90 Tc normalized diamagnetic νϕ Vortex velocity moment Maximum superconducting T max ξ Coherence length c transition temperature Tc taken at 0.1% of the onset Tc normalized diamagnetic ρ Resistivity moment Transmission electron TEM Φ Magnetic flux quantum microscopy 0 TOF Time-of-flight χ vol Volumetric susceptibility V Voltage or volume χ Volumetric susceptibility Vibrating sample VSM Ψ Order parameter magnetometer
xix
ABSTRACT
After nearly seven years of research effort since the discovery of iron-based superconductors,
wires and tapes of K-doped BaFe2As2 have finally been developed by the inexpensive and scalable powder-in-tube technique with critical current densities reaching over 0.1 MAcm-2 at 4.2 K. Such progress relies heavily on the development of synthesis techniques that eliminate cracks and secondary phases. High energy ball milling, during which mechanochemical reactions take place, proves to be effective in producing high quality bulk material. The consolidation of high quality powders under high pressure produces bulk material with a fine grain microstructure and
surprisingly high intergranular current density. We explore the dependence of doped BaFe2As2 superconducting properties on sintering temperature in bulks, wires, and tapes to further optimize these materials and find that grain boundaries continue to act as weak-links, effectively blocking current, and limiting the intergranular critical current density in these materials. However, evidence of composition variation and impurity segregation across grain-boundaries suggests that the weak-linked behavior may still be of an extrinsic nature. Despite the current limiting effects of these weak-links, transport current is high enough in our fine grain material to demonstrate the first > 1 T magnet made out of an iron-based superconductor. These results provide a positive outlook for the potential future use of these materials to produce high field magnets.
xx
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
The first chapter of this dissertation provides a background and introduction to iron based superconductors, and to superconductivity in general. Chapter 2 provides an in-depth discussion of experimental techniques used in this work. The remaining chapters are presented as stand- alone publications, including their own, less in-depth, introduction and experimental sections. Chapters 3, 4, and 7 are published works and as such have gone through a peer review process. The remaining chapters have not yet been published or reviewed by peers.
Most modern day superconducting magnets are made using the low temperature superconductors
NbTi and Nb3Sn. These superconductors require low temperature operation (typically 4.2 K) and are typically limited to fields below 16 T. Cuprate superconductors can operate at much higher temperatures and magnetic fields but are limited by high anisotropy and grain boundaries that act as weak-links by blocking current transport. As a result, the cuprate superconductors require costly coated conductor technology that limits its use to a few niche applications.
In 2008 superconductivity was discovered in a new family of superconductors known as Fe- based superconductors (FBS)1. Since then, the FBS ‘family’ has grown to include dozens of
compounds. Of those compounds, doped BaFe2As2 has sufficient properties to make it appealing
for applications, including inexpensive constituents, superconducting transition temperatures (Tc) 2 up to 38 K, upper critical fields (Hc2) over 90 T, and very high intrinsic critical current densities over 1 MAcm-2 (4.2 K, 10 T).3,4 In addition, there is a high versatility in how the superconducting properties can arise and be altered with doping and pressure, providing a unique opportunity to probe and elucidate basic physical phenomena, such as superconductivity and granularity in high temperature superconductors, which continues to be some of the biggest mysteries in condensed matter science.
For applications to be realized, the bulk (global) intergranular critical current density as a global function of field (Jc (H)) must be increased. In 2008, we began exploring synthesis routes and studying the phase relations in FBS materials to eliminate secondary phases that block current. By 2009, weak-link behavior in Co-doped BaFe2As2 was confirmed by measuring the
1
critical current across grain boundaries in bi-crystals.5 In 2011, we measured surprisingly high 6 critical current density in polycrystalline (bulk) K-doped BaFe2As2, providing motivation for further studies to clarify the extent of intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to weak-link behavior in this material.
global As a result, we designed experiments to further optimize Jc (H), and to understand the weak- link behavior that limits it. This thesis represents an accumulation of our results in which we use processing tools and physical characterization to optimize bulk properties and clarify the extent global to which this material may benefit society. We found that Jc (H) varies significantly with dopant, grain size, and grain boundary composition, and we demonstrated that the best material has properties sufficient to make a bulk superconducting magnet. This thesis describes these findings in further detail.
1.1 – Background The physical properties of these FBS materials have been of great interest since they show unconventional magnetic and superconducting properties and contain Fe, which was long believed to be intrinsically detrimental to superconductivity because Fe is magnetic, and magnetism and superconductivity are typically in competition. While properties and structure can vary considerably for FBS materials, commonalities exist. They are layered materials made up of FeAs (or FeSe) planes sandwiched between layers of other atoms with varying complexities. These FeAs layers are where the active superconducting electron pairs are expected to be most prevalent.7,8 For many of these compounds, superconductivity arises when carriers are doped into the system either chemically, by substituting atoms, or physically by applying pressure.
Currently there are several families of pnictide superconductors that have been discovered. The (RE)FeAsO (RE = rare earth) family, also known as RE-1111, where rare earths include La, Pr,
Nd, Sm, or Gd, is well explored due to the high Tc that is obtainable. The substitution of F for O 9 is employed to get the maximum Tc of 55 K in Sm1111 material. The volatility of O and F and the high stability of oxide phases that tend to exist in Re-1111 samples have provided a significant challenge in producing clean bulk material with robust superconducting 4,10–13 properties. (AE)Fe2As2 is another family of superconductors referred to here as AE122
2
(AE = alkaline earth) with AE = Sr, Ba, and Ca. Superconductivity can be induced in this family by doping any of the three atomic sites which makes it unique among superconductors. Substituting in the Fe site Co or Ni results in electron doping of the active FeAs layers. Electron doping in the non-active AE layer can also be achieved by substituting RE elements on the AE site (ie La for Sr, Ba, or Ca). Hole doping in the non-active AE layer can be achieved by substituting on the AE site an alkali metal to induce superconductivity. Chemical pressure can induce superconductivity by doping As with a smaller isovalent atom (P). The wide diversity of ways to vary the Fermi surface in AE122 makes this a very interesting system in which to study superconductivity. The lack of volatile elements like O and F makes synthesis easier and the absence of lighter elements with low z-numbers (like oxygen) makes characterization much simpler because analytical techniques like electron microscopy and x-ray spectroscopy are better suited for studying heavier elements. There have been many studies to understand the physical differences in superconducting properties between these various modes of doping. However, investigations into the difference between grain boundary (GB) properties are lacking. In particular, the only bicrystal studies have been on Co-doped AE122,5,14 while the highest
global 6,15 intergranular critical current density Jc is reported in K-doped AE122. Sakagami et al. reported robust GB critical current density in 24 degree [001] tilt bicrystals of P-doped Ba122 at 16 BGB self-field and 4.2 K. Figure 1.1 shows a comparison of transport across GBs (Jc ) vs GB 17 misorientation angle (θGB) of the best Ba122 bicrystals compared to YBCO bicrystals. These data suggest that GBs act as intrinsic weak-links although high angle GBs are not as detrimental BGB to Jc as in YBCO. However, despite these findings, unexpectedly high Jc was later observed in K-doped Ba122 wires6 suggesting that polycrystalline Ba122 material may still be useful for global applications, although further increase of Jc by an order of magnitude and better in field global Jc will be required before applications can be seriously considered. Given that these materials are still very much in their research infancy, we are continuing to study them not just for the scientific merit of doing so, but also for the very real possibility that ways to circumvent the weak-link problem may exist beyond the expensive coated conductor technology that has been developed for YBCO and is still not perfected.
3
BGB Figure 1.1 - Dependence of the critical current density across GBs Jc as a function of 14 16 the [001] tilt misorientation angle for Co-doped BaFe2As2, P-doped BaFe2As2, and YBCO.17
Figure 1.2 - Upper critical field as a function of temperature for various superconductors.18
Figure 1.2 shows a comparison of Hc2(T) between FBS and the current most common 18 superconductors used in industry. Low temperature superconductors and MgB2 have low
Hc2(T) which limits high field applications. Clearly there is an application potential for Fe-based
superconductors at high-field and low temperature. Although Hc2 and Tc may not be as high as in the cuprates, the low anisotropy (~1.2 for Ba122 vs. >7 for YBCO) is advantageous and since
4
the grains are less weakly linked, engineering the pnictide conductor is considerably less involved for wires and textured thin films.19,20
1.2 – Parallels Between FBS and Cuprates The iron-arsenic family of superconductors share many parallels with cuprate high temperature superconductors. Sm1111 is a layered material that has the ZrCuSiAs type crystal structure belonging to the tetragonal P4/nmm space group. Ba122 has a closely related ThCr2Si2 type crystal structure. The layered structures of Sm1111 and Ba122 both have covalent bonding in the FeAs layers with interlayer ionic bonding. Sm1111 consists of alternating layers of 2- 2+ 2+ (Fe2As2) and (Sm2O2) while Ba122 swaps out the (Sm2O2) layer for a single divalent atom (Ba2+). This yields a highly two dimensional electronic structure with the FeAs electron carrier layer in the pnictide materials resembling the CuO layer in the cuprates. Superconductivity emerges when the parent compound is doped with holes or electrons to suppress the magnetic order, or when pressure from physical or chemical stress results in lattice distortions that suppress the spin density wave (SDW).21 The structural similarities between the cuprates and ferropnictides, as well as the emergence of high temperature superconductivity through suppression of the SDW, suggest that the cuprates and pnictides share some of the same fundamental ingredients required for high temperature superconductivity to emerge.
One of the main obstacles associated with developing high temperature superconductor (HTS) devices is the inability to transmit current through high angle grain boundaries.12,22 As a result, applications have been limited and rely on expensive processing for HTS requiring techniques in which preferential texturing is used to minimize GB misorientation angles. Applications for superconductors still mostly rely on low temperature superconductors for this very reason. A pressing question is why GBs are detrimental for current flow in some superconductors, while in other superconductors they are transparent to current flow, or sometimes even advantageous in
raising Jc as is the case for Nb3Sn. In the BaFe2As2 system there is evidence of both weak link behavior, in which GBs severely limit current flow, as well as robust GB properties, in which significant current can pass across many high angle GBs. The fundamental superconducting properties in the BaFe2As2 system are strongly influenced by the choice of the dopant which gives rise to superconductivity. While there has been much study of single crystal properties as
5
they vary with chemical doping, bulk properties remain largely unexplored particularly for well- connected material with clean GBs.
1.3 – Current Transport in Bulk Ferropnictides Assessing the intrinsic properties of the bulk ferropnictide material has been a challenge. FeAs impurity phases have been found in most bulk samples synthesized so far. This non- superconducting phase forms before the bulk material and melts at the temperatures required for synthesis. As a result, grain boundaries are typically surrounded by the FeAs wetting phase that blocks current transport along with a Sm2O3 insulating phase typically found in Sm1111 samples. If clean ferropnictides can be produced with grain boundaries that allow for the transport of supercurrent, then round wires with randomly oriented grain boundaries in the material can be produced. If they exhibit intrinsic weak linked behavior between grain boundaries, then texturing may be required to allow material grains to line up with each other to effectively transport current under applied magnetic fields.
Figure 1.3 – Optical image taken under polarized light (left) of a polycrystalline Ba(Fe0.9Co0.1)2As2 bulk sample and the corresponding magneto optical image (right) taken after Zero-field cooling and applying a magnetic field of 100 mT at 7 K.
6
Figure 1.3 shows a polycrystalline Ba122 sample and its corresponding magneto optical image (MOI). The MOI technique visualizes how the magnetic flux penetrates into the sample. The flux is excluded from the center of the grains due to the diamagnetism of the superconductor but penetrates into the non-superconducting FeAs wetting phase and/or intrinsically weak-linked grain boundaries. As a result, the difference in magnetic properties is visualized and shows clear electromagnetic granularity. Ba122 epitaxial thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) have allowed for current transport to be analyzed across individual grain boundaries that were free of this wetting phase.5 This is realized by growing the material on bicrystal STO substrates with predetermined orientation angles. Lee et al. used low temperature laser scanning microscopy (LTLSM) and MOI to determine that the Ba122 material grain boundaries intrinsically inhibit the transport of current as a function of grain orientation angle. They were able to compare this data to bicrystal experiments done with YBCO 17 to determine that the current transport for Ba122 was not limited as dramatically with increasing misorientation angle. Ba122 allows for higher angle grain boundaries to transmit current than for YBCO before an exponential decrease in Jc.
Kametani et al. used LTLSM coupled with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate intergrain current flow in randomly oriented polycrystalline Sm1111 samples confirming grain to grain transport was blocked due to cracks and a high density of FeAs wetting phase. 23 Under 0.1 T magnetic field they found the dissipation spots indicated by LTLSM decreased dramatically indicating weak linked behavior, though they were not able to conclude whether it was an indication of intrinsic weak linked behavior of the material’s own grain boundaries or the extrinsic wetting phase. Other groups have recently reported bulk synthesis techniques for Sm1111 with dramatically reduced impurity phases present that still show a dramatic decrease in 11,24 Jc under a weak magnetic field (< 1 T).
There are several reasons why grain boundaries might limit supercurrent. Stoichiometry variations typically manifest themselves in the grain boundary region due to the presence of vacancies and strains in these high energy regions. This may affect the scattering of carriers, thus affecting critical current density.17 Graser et al. modeled the charging of the interface between dislocation cores, the density of which increases as misorientation angle increases, at the grain boundaries.25
7
1.4 – Characteristic Lengths in Type-II Superconductors Ginzburg and Landau’s phenomenological theory was developed to describe superconductivity in terms of thermodynamics, postulating that superconductivity was associated with a phase transition that must depend on some superconducting order parameter Ψ based on the 26,27 superconducting charge carrier number density np. In dissertations about superconducting materials, it is standard to go somewhat in depth regarding the derivation of Ginzburg-Landau’s equations, derivations from Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer’s (BCS) complex quantum mechanical theory of superconductivity, and later theories concerning the intricacies of vortex physics.28–31 Since the focus of this dissertation is on the synthesis and characterization of select iron-based superconductors, only a brief introduction to theory is given here with emphasis on equations and characteristic lengths derived elsewhere that are pertinent to the description of mesoscopic phenomenon studied herein.
According to Ginzburg-Landau theory, Abriksov worked out that type-II superconductors have a negative surface energy that allows for magnetic flux to penetrate the superconductors in the form of long filaments when the applied magnetic field H ≥ Hcl, where Hcl is the lower critical
field. When Hc1 > H> Hc2, (Hc2 being the upper critical field) the superconductor is in a mixed state in which the superconducting material is divided into normal and superconducting regions. This negative surface energy results because as the magnetic penetration depth (λ) increases, the diamagnetic screening energy is reduced and as the Ginzburg-Landau coherence length (ξ) gets shorter, the recovery of the Ginzburg-Landau order parameter (ψ) occurs more quickly resulting in more condensation energy. This is true for materials with a Ginzburg-Landau parameter, κ = λ/ ξ, greater than 1/√2. To maximize the boundary surface area the superconductor divides into normal and superconducting regions. The normal (non-superconducting) flux containing regions are known as vortices since super current circulates around them. The free energy (F) of a superconductor near Tc according to Ginzburg-landau theory can be expanded in a series of the form:
2 2 2 β 4 1 h 2e h F = F +αψ + ψ + ∇ − Aψ + n0 2 4m i c 8π
Where Fn0 is the normal state free energy, α and β are temperature dependent coefficients, m is the effective mass, e is the charge of an electron, A is the vector potential, ħ is the reduced
8
Planck’s constant, and h is the local magnetic field.32 Two key characteristic lengths are derived from the above equation. Ψ is zero in the center of a vortex and recovers to its equilibrium value at a characteristic distance ξ from the vortex’s center, given by the following equation:
h 2 ξ = 2mα
This can also be thought of as the characteristic length describing the spatial size of the superconducting charge carries. The characteristic length for the decay of magnetic field in a superconductor is given as: