Risikovurdering Av Bd Og Bsal Samt Cytridiomykose I Norge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risikovurdering Av Bd Og Bsal Samt Cytridiomykose I Norge VKM Report 2019: 4 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from the pathogenic fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 15.05.2019 Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) 2019:4 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from the pathogenic fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 15.05.2019 ISBN: 978-82-8259-320-5 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Po 222 Skøyen N – 0213 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: ColourBox Suggested citation: VKM, Nielsen, A., Dolmen, D., Höglund, J., Kausrud, K., Malmstrøm, M., Taugbøl, A., Vrålstad, T., Ytrehus, B., de Boer, H., Hindar, K., Kirkendall, L., Nilsen, E. B., Rueness, E. K. and Velle, G. (2019). Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from the pathogenic fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal). Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment. VKM report 2019:4, ISBN: 978-82-8259-320-5, ISSN: 2535-4019. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2019: 4 15.05.2019 Assessment of the risk to Norwegian biodiversity from the pathogenic fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) Authors of the opinion VKM has appointed a project group consisting of 4 VKM members and 4 external experts to answer the request from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. Members of the project group that contributed to the drafting of the opinion (in alphabetical order after chair of the project group): Anders Nielsen – chair of the project group and member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo. Dag Dolmen – Member of the project group. Affiliation: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Jacob Höglund – Member of the project group. Affiliation: Uppsala University (UU). Kyrre Kausrud – Chair of the project group and member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) The Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NVI). Martin Malmstrøm – Member of the project group and project leader in the VKM secretariat. Affiliation: VKM. Annette Taugbøl – Member of the project group. Affiliation: Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trude Vrålstad – Member of the project group. Affiliation: The Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NVI). Bjørnar Ytrehus – Member of the project group and member of the Panel on Microbial Ecology in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA). The opinion has been assessed and approved by the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Members of the panel that contributed to the assessment and approval of the opinion (in alphabetical order before chair/vice-chair of the Panel/Committee): Hugo de Boer – Member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Natural History Museum, Oslo. Kjetil Hindar – Member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA). VKM Report 2019: 4 15.05.2019 Lawrence Kirkendall – Member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Department of Biology, University of Bergen. Erlend B. Nilsen – Member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA). Eli K. Rueness – Member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo. Gaute Velle – Chair of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Norwegian Research Centre AS (NORCE); 3) Department of Biology, University of Bergen. Acknowledgments VKM would like to thank the referees Professor An Martel (Ghent University) and Professor Matthew Fisher (Imperial College London) for reviewing and commenting on the manuscript. Competence of VKM experts Persons working for VKM, either as appointed members of the Committee or as external experts, do this by virtue of their scientific expertise, not as representatives for their employers or third-party interests. The Civil Services Act instructions on legal competence apply for all work prepared by VKM. VKM Report 2019: 4 15.05.2019 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................ 9 Sammendrag på norsk ......................................................................................... 13 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 17 Background as provided by the Norwegian Environment Agency ........................ 18 Terms of reference as provided by the Norwegian Environment Agency ............. 19 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 20 1.1 Amphibians in Norway .......................................................................................... 20 Great crested newt (Triturus cristatus (storsalamander)) .............................. 20 Smooth newt (Lissotriton vulgaris (småsalamander)) .................................... 22 Common toad (Bufo bufo (nordpadde)) .......................................................24 Common frog (Rana temporaria (buttsnutefrosk)) ........................................ 27 Moor frog (Rana arvalis (spissnutefrosk)) .................................................... 29 Pool frog (Pelophylax lessonae (damfrosk)) ................................................. 31 Edible frog (Pelophylax esculentus (hybridfrosk)) ......................................... 33 Joint distributions ...................................................................................... 35 The role of amphibians in the ecosystem ..................................................... 36 1.2 Pathogenic fungi infecting animals ......................................................................... 37 Animal diseases caused by pathogenic fungi ................................................ 37 Definition of, and distinction between, disease and outbreak ......................... 39 1.3 Pathogenic fungi of amphibians ............................................................................. 40 Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) .......................................................... 40 1.3.1.1 Taxonomy and strains ............................................................................. 41 1.3.1.2 Host specificity ....................................................................................... 42 1.3.1.3 Mode of infection .................................................................................... 42 1.3.1.4 Lifecycle / persistence ............................................................................. 43 1.3.1.5 Virulence ............................................................................................... 45 1.3.1.6 Prevalence and effects on different amphibian species ............................... 46 1.3.1.7 Bd in Europe .......................................................................................... 49 1.3.1.8 Bd in Scandinavia ................................................................................... 51 1.3.1.9 Factors influencing prevalence and disease development ........................... 51 1.3.1.10 Hosts and vectors influencing/facilitating the spread of Bd ....................... 54 Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) .................................................. 55 VKM Report 2019: 4 15.05.2019 1.3.2.1 Taxonomy and strains ............................................................................. 56 1.3.2.2 Host specificity ....................................................................................... 57 1.3.2.3 Mode of infection .................................................................................... 57 1.3.2.4 Lifecycle / persistence ............................................................................. 57 1.3.2.5 Virulence ............................................................................................... 58 1.3.2.6 Prevalence and effect on different amphibian species ................................ 58 1.3.2.7 Bsal in Europe ........................................................................................ 60 1.3.2.8 Bsal in Scandinavia ................................................................................. 60 1.3.2.9 Factors influencing the prevalence and disease development...................... 61 1.3.2.10 Hosts and vectors influencing/facilitating the spread of Bsal ....................
Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Framework, Stratigraphy, Sedimentation and Volcanism of the Late Precambrian Hedmark Group, Østerdalen, South Norway
    Tectonic framework, stratigraphy, sedimentation and volcanism of the Late Precambrian Hedmark Group, Østerdalen, south Norway TORMOD SÆTHER & JOHAN PETTER NYSTUEN Sæther. T. & Nystuen, J. P. 1981: Tectonic framework, stratigraphy, sedimentation and volcanism of the Late Precambrian Hedmark Group, Østerdalen, south Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 61, pp. 193-211. Oslo 1981. ISSN 0029-196X. The Hedmark Group in the Imsdalen - BjØrånes - Atna - Øvre Rendal area belongs to the Osen-Røa Nappe Complex, and crops out northwest of the late-Caledonian central Østerdalen structural depression. The Brøttum Formation and the Imsdalen Conglomerate occur on the southwestern side of the Imsdalen fault (IMF), which is a synthrust high angle reverse fault. The pre-Varanger Brøttum Formation (turbidites, deltaic, fluvial) is correlated with the fluvial Rendalen Formation NE of IMF. Basin evolution prior to the Varanger glaciation also includes carbonate sedimentation, black mud deposition in stagnant secondary basins, and block faulting accompanied by basalt volcanism and coarse-clastic, subaqueous resedimentation. The glacial Moelv Tillite rests unconformably on various units and was succeeded by post-glacial deltaic and fluvial sedimentation and earl y Cambrian deposition of shallow-marine quartz sands. New formations are defined: the Imsdalen Conglomerate and the Svartt}Ørnkampen Basalt. The Atna Quartzite is given the rank of formation, and the B}Ørånes Shale Member is referred to the Biri Formation. Parts of the Sollia Formation are correlated with well-established formations in the Hedmark Group. T. Sæther, Saga Petroleum, Maries vei 20, P. O. Box 9, 1322 Høvik, Norway. J. P. Nystuen, Institutt for geologi, Norges landbrukshØgskole, 1432 As-NLH, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • 0432 Ytre Rendalen, Rendalen Prestegjeld
    Folketeljing 1910 for 0432 Ytre Rendalen, Rendalen prestegjeld Digitalarkivet 09.09.2014 Utskrift frå Digitalarkivet, Arkivverkets teneste for publisering av kjelder på internett: http://digitalarkivet.no Digitalarkivet - Arkivverket Innhald Løpande liste ................................ 11 Førenamnsregister ........................ 99 Etternamnsregister ...................... 119 Fødestadregister .......................... 139 Bustadregister ............................. 145 4 Folketeljingar i Noreg Det er halde folketeljingar i Noreg i 1769, 1801, 1815, 1825, 1835, 1845, 1855, 1865, 1870 (i nokre byar), 1875, 1885 (i byane), 1891, 1900, 1910, 1920, 1930, 1946, 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980 og 1990. Av teljingane før 1865 er berre ho frå i 1801 nominativ, dvs ho listar enkeltpersonar ved namn. Teljingane i 1769 og 1815-55 er numeriske, men med namnelistar i grunnlagsmateriale for nokre prestegjeld. Statistikklova i 1907 la sterke restriksjonar på bruken av nyare teljingar. Etter lov om offisiell statistikk og Statistisk Sentralbyrå (statistikklova) frå 1989 skal desse teljingane ikkje frigjevast før etter 100 år. 1910-teljinga vart difor frigjeven 1. desember 2010. Folketeljingane er avleverte til Arkivverket. Riksarkivet har originalane frå teljingane i 1769, 1801, 1815-1865, 1870, 1891, 1910, 1930, 1950, 1970 og 1980, mens statsarkiva har originalane til teljingane i 1875, 1885, 1900, 1920, 1946 og 1960 for sine distrikt. Folketeljinga 1. desember 1910 Ved kgl. Res. 23. september 1910 vart det kunngjort at det skulle haldast ”almindelig Folketælling” for å få ei detaljert oversikt over Noregs befolkning natta mellom 1. og 2. desember 1910. På kvar bustad skulle alle personar til stades førast inn i teljingslista, med særskilt merknad om dei som var mellombels til stades (på besøk osv) på teljingstidspunktet. I tillegg skulle alle faste bebuarar som var fråverande (på reise, til sjøs osv) på teljingstidspunktet førast inn på lista.
    [Show full text]
  • Samer I Østerdalen? En Studie Av Etnisitet I Jernalderen
    Samer i Østerdalen? En studie av etnisitet i jernalderen og middelalderen i det nordøstre Hedmark Jostein Bergstøl Universitetet i Oslo 2008 Innholdsfortegnelse: Kapittel 1.................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Innledning........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1. Overordnede problemstillinger ................................................................................ 1 1.1.2. Presentasjon av studieområdet ................................................................................. 2 1.1.3. Noen begrepsavklaringer.......................................................................................... 3 1.2. Forskningshistorie .......................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1. ”Norrønt” og ”samisk” i forhistorien ....................................................................... 3 1.2.2. Samisk (for)historie.................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3. ”Den Norske Jernalderen”........................................................................................ 6 1.2.4. Fangstfolk i sør.........................................................................................................9 1.2.5. Jernalderen i Østerdalsområdet .............................................................................. 11
    [Show full text]
  • 202101 Kommuneplanens Arealdel Varsel Om Oppstart.Pdf
    Rendalen kommune PLAN/NÆRING/DRIFT «f1» «f3» «f4» «f5» «f6» Rendalen, 21.04.2021 Vår ref. Løpenr. Arkivkode Saksbehandler Deres ref. 20/333-13 3839/21 142 Erin Sandberg 47472349 VARSEL OM OPPSTART AV REVIDERING AV KOMMUNEPLANENS AREALDEL OG HØRING OG OFFENTLIG ETTERSYN AV PLANPROGRAM Rendalen kommune er i gang med å revidere kommuneplanens arealdel og det varsles nå om oppstart av planarbeidet, jf. plan- og bygningsloven § 11-12. Samtidig legges planprogram for revideringen ut til høring og offentlig ettersyn. Planprogrammet legger føringer for hvordan planprosessen skal gjennomføres med opplegg for medvirkning, analyser, utredninger og sentrale temaer. Det er lagt opp til en relativt omfattende revidering med bred involvering av innbyggere, næringsliv, hytteeiere, lag og foreninger mm. På bakgrunn av planprogrammet utarbeides det et planforslag som skal på høring og offentlig ettersyn vinteren 2023. Ifølge framdriftsplanen skal arealdelen vedtas før sommeren 2023. Sentrale temaer for revideringen er: • Naturfareområder (flom, skred osv.) • Innarbeiding av hensynssoner fra kulturminneplanen • Spredt bebyggelse i landbruks-, natur- og friluftsområder samt reindrift (LNFR) • Vassdrag • Naturmangfold • Energi og klima • Nye utbyggingsområder • Vurdering av eksisterende reguleringsplaner • Hytteområder – strøm, vei og bruksendring • Drikkevann og avløpshåndtering • Bolig- og næringsarealer, transportutvikling • Delplaner Harsjøen og Renåfjellet • Jord, skog og utmark • Generell gjennomgang av plankart og bestemmelser Postadresse Telefon Telefaks Org.nr. Bankgironr. Hanestadveien 1 62 46 85 00 62 46 85 01 NO 940028515 1822.62.12619 2484 RENDALEN E-post: [email protected] Hjemmeside: www.rendalen.kommune.no Rendalen kommune I planprogrammet er temaene beskrevet nærmere. Det skal utarbeides en konsekvensutredning for nye utbyggingsområder og relevante temakart og analyser. Planprosess Planprogrammet beskriver hvordan berørte parter skal involveres i planprosessen.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative and Statistical Areas English Version – SOSI Standard 4.0
    Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 Administrative and statistical areas Norwegian Mapping Authority [email protected] Norwegian Mapping Authority June 2009 Page 1 of 191 Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 1 Applications schema ......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Administrative units subclassification ....................................................................................7 1.1 Description ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.1 CityDistrict ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.2 CityDistrictBoundary ................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3 SubArea ................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.4 BasicDistrictUnit ....................................................................................................... 15 1.1.5 SchoolDistrict ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.6 <<DataType>> SchoolDistrictId ............................................................................... 17 1.1.7 SchoolDistrictBoundary ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Latest Precambrian and Eocambrian Rocks in Norway
    NORGES GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØKELSE NR. 251 Studies on the latest Precambrian and Eocambrian Rocks in Norway No. 3. Latest Precambrian and Eocambrian Stratigraphy of Norway By K. Bjørlykke, J. O. Englund and L. A. Kirkhusmo No. 4. The Eocambrian "Reusch moraine" at Bigganjargga and the Geology around Varangerfjord; Northern Norway By Knut Bjørlykke No. 5. Microfossils from late Precambrian sediments around lake Mjøsa, Southern Norway By Svein Manum No. 6. Fossils from pebbles in the Biskopåsen Formation in Southern Norway By Nils Spjeldnæs No. 7. Eocambrian rocks on the north-west border of the Trondheim basin Ly J. Springer Peacey No. 8. Stratigraphy and structure of Eocambrian and younger deposits in a part of the Gudbrandsdal valley district, South Norway By Trygve Strand OSLO 1967 UNIVERSITETSFORLAGET STATENS TEKNQLQBISaE INSTITUTT BIBLIOTEKET Contents Illest krecamlirian and Locainiirian Ztracizrapn^ of Norway by K. Lj^rlxkke, J. O. Englund and L. A. Kirkhusmo 5 The Eocambrian «Reusch moraine» at Bigganjargga and the Geology around Va rangerfjord; Northern Norway by Knut Bjørlykke 18 Microfossils from late Precambrian sediments around lake Mjøsa, Southern Norway fZ by Svein Manum 45 se I 1055i1z from pebbleB in the Biskopåsen Formation in Southern Norway by Nils Spjeldnæs 53 3 o Eocambrian rocks on the north-west border of the Trondheim basin by J. Springer Peacey 83 g » m Stratigraphy and structure of Eocambrian and younger deposits in a part of the Gudbrandsdal valley district, South Norway by Trygve Strand 93 co STUDIES ON THE LATEST PRECAMBRIAN AND EOCAMBRIAN ROCKS IN NORWAY No. 3. LATEST PRECAMBRIAN AND EOCAMBRIAN Biil^iittie^rnr OF NORWAY By K.
    [Show full text]
  • From Grain to Group
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 From grain to group A bank for people and businesses in towns and villages for 175 years Content Page How to read our report 3 SpareBank 1 Østlandet in brief 4 Financial targets and achievement 6 A word from the CEO 8 The macro picture 10 1. About SpareBank 1 Østlandet 12 1.1 Key figures from the Group 14 1.2 The equity capital certificate 18 1 1.3 Our strategic focus 22 1.4 A look back at 2020 28 1.5 Our proud history - from grain to group 30 2. Group Management 38 Organisation chart and stakes 40 Group Management 41 Financial Advisers Elisabeth Færevaag and Joachim Vorkinn. Oslo. 2 Business areas and support functions 42 2.1 Corporate governance 44 2.2 Business description 56 How to read our report 2.3 The Bank's social role 68 2.4 Our employees 76 This annual report is an integrated includes the Board of Directors’ Report, report based on the IIRC’s principles for Income Statement, Balance Sheet, 3. Our material sustainability topics 80 integrated reporting. It describes how Changes in Equity, Cash Flow Statement, Framework for our sustainability initiative 82 SpareBank 1 Østlandet contributes to Notes, Statement from the Board of 3.1 Responsible lending 84 sustainable growth and the development Directors and CEO, Auditor’s Report 3 3.2 Combating economic crime 92 of our customers, owners, employees and and Subsidiaries. society as a whole. 3.3 Ethics and anti-corruption 94 The main part is followed by a number of 3.4 Requirements for providers of financial services 96 The Chapter ‘About SpareBank 1 appendices, including ‘Further facts about 3.5 Ethical marketing of products and services 98 Østlandet’ presents key figures from the SpareBank 1 Østlandet’s sustainability Group and an overview of the develop- work’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Order Raphidioptera in Norway
    Norw. J. Entomol. 49, 81-92. 2002 The order Raphidioptera in Norway Uta Greve Greve, L. 2002. The order Raphidioptera in NOlway. Norw. J. Entomol. 49, 81-92. The order Raphidioptera, snake-flies, is reviewed based on material in the collections of the four Norwegian university museums, and material in the collections ofsome private collectors, altoget­ her 454 specimens belonging to the three species Phaeostigma notata (Fabricius, 1781), Xanthostigma xanthostigma (Schummel, 1832) and Raphidia ophiopsis L.,1758. Keys to species for adults and larvae are presented. The distribution is mapped. Remarks on the phenology and biology are given. Key words: Raphidioptera, snake-flies, distribution, Norway. Lira Greve, Zoological Museum, University ofBergen, Museplass 3, NO-5007 Bergen - Univ., Norway. INTRODUCTION The order Raphidioptera is divided in two well­ characterized families, the Raphidiidae with Three species of the order Raphidioptera, snake­ around 180-190 species and the Inocelliidae with flies, have been recorded from Norway. Raphidio­ about 20 species (Aspock et al. 1991). ptera is on a world scale basis a small order, and only 205 species are known. Probably not more than Snake-flies are confined to arboreal habitats, 250 species exist today (Aspock 1998, 1999). bushes may do for some. All species need a period oflow temperature around or below zero to induce The Raphidioptera is an old group with many fossil pupation or hatching ofadults. The larvae ofmost species from the Jurassic and the Cretaceous periods. species lives under bark of trees or shrubs, or in In the end of the Cretaceous all snake-flies in the crevices of living wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Precambrian Moelv Tillite Deposited on a Discontinuity Surface Associated with a Fossil Ice Wedge, Rendalen, Southern Norway
    LATE PRECAMBRIAN MOELV TILLITE DEPOSITED ON A DISCONTINUITY SURFACE ASSOCIATED WITH A FOSSIL ICE WEDGE, RENDALEN, SOUTHERN NORWAY JOHAN PETTER NYSTUEN Nystuen. J. P.: Late Precambrian Moelv Tillite deposited on a discontinuity surface associated with a fossil ice wedge, Rendalen, southern Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 56, pp. 29-56. Oslo 1976. East of SjØlisand in Rendalen the Moelv Tillite rests on the Ring Sandstone with an erosional contact. wedge structure in the sandstone just beneath A the Moelv Tillite is interpreted as a fossil ice wedge. A conglomerate, con­ sidered to have been deposited as a glaciofluvial grave! in a proglacial en­ vironment, occurs at the base of the Moelv Tillite. tillite sheet within the A conglomerate is thought to be a flow till deposit. The clast content of the Moelv Tillite indicates a glacial transport from the S or SW. The origin of the discontinuity surface is considered to be related to a eustatic lowering of sea leve! prior to glaciation of the region. glacial deposition from a A grounded ice sheet is discussed, likewise the palaeoclimatic implications of periglacial phenomena in the Late Precambrian tillites of northern and northwestern Europe. J. P. Nystuen, Institutt for geologi, Norges Landbrukshøgskole, 1432 Ås-NLH, Norway. Since Holtedahl (1922) proposed a glacial origin for the Moelv Tillite, it has been generally accepted that this sedimentary unit originated by the rafting of till debris with floating ice (Spjeldnæs 1964, Bjørlykke 1966, 1974, Løberg 1970, Englund 1972, 1973). This interpretation rests essentially upon the observations, made in several areas, of a gradual transition from the underlying Ring Sandstone or shale equivalent upwards into the Moelv Tillite (Holtedahl 1922, 1953, Skjeseth 1963, Bjørlykke 1965, 1966, 1974, Englund 1972, 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Stortingsvalget 1933
    NORGES OFFISIELLE STATISTIKK. IX. 26. STORTINGSVALGET 1933 (Élections en 1933 pour le «Storting».) UTGITT AV STORTINGETS KONTOR. OSLO. I KOMMISJON HOS H. ASCHEHOUG & CO. 1934. OSLO - O. FREDR. ARNESENS BOK- OG AKSIDENSTRYKKERI - 1934, Forord. Nærværende statistikk er utarbeidet efter samme system som de efter valgene i 1921, 1924, 1927 og 1930 utkomne. Første del, som inneholder de almindelige statistiske Oplysninger (tab. 1—4, s. 1—30). er utarbeidet av fullmektig i Stortinget P. A. "Wessel-Berg på grunnlag av de fra valgstyrenes formenn innsendte skjematiske opgaver. Disse Lar som før i stor utstrekning måttet sammenholdes med og suppleres ved hjelp av de til Stortingets kontor innsendte valgdokumenter. Annen del inneholder den politiske fordeling av stemmene. Fordelingen er skjedd på grunnlag av de på hvert enkelt parti falne listestemmer under sammenhold med de øvrige valgdokumenter og innsendte opgaver. Utregningen som omfatter s. 31—150, er foretatt av førstesekretær ved Stortingets kontor Karl Bjørnstad. — De siste sider (tab. 5—6, s. 151—160) er utarbeidet av arkivar i Stortinget Y. H af f ner. Oslo i mars 1934. P. A. Wessel-Berg. Karl Bjørnstad. Valgdistrikter, valgsogn m. v. I tiden 1 september 1930—1 september 1933 er foretatt følgende endringer med hensyn til jurisdiksjonsgrenser og navn: 1. Ved kgl. resolusjon 12 desember 1930 blev Kråkstad herred (Akershus fylke) delt i to herreder, Kråkstad og Ski. Delingen trådte i kraft 1 juli 1931. 2. Ved kgl. resolusjon 23 januar 1931 blev herredsnavnet Hølandet (Sør-Trøndelag fylke) forandret til Hølonda. 3. Den 6 mars 1931 er sanksjonert lov om forandring i lov av 4 juni 1929 om navne- skifte for byen Trondhjem — hvorefter navnet blev Trondheim.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkesteder Hedmark.Pdf (10.59Mb)
    KILDEGJENNOMGANG Middelalderske kirkesteder i Hedmark fylke Ringsaker kirke. Foto: Bård Langvandslien / Riksantikvaren Juni 2015 INNHOLD INNLEDNING .......................................................................................................................... 4 KONGSVINGER KOMMUNE .............................................................................................. 5 Vinger døperen Johannes (hovedkirke) ............................................................................. 5 Øyset Sta. Margareta ........................................................................................................... 6 Furulund St. Lavrans ........................................................................................................... 7 Berger Sta. Maria ................................................................................................................. 8 HAMAR KOMMUNE ............................................................................................................. 9 Vang St. Clemens (hovedkirke) ........................................................................................... 9 Hommelstad ........................................................................................................................ 10 Skattum ............................................................................................................................... 11 Nashaug ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deltakerstatistikk Landsskytterstevnet 2015 Lesja
    Deltakerstatistikk Landsskytterstevnet 2015 Lesja Klasse Bane Felt Grovfelt 20 og yngre Kvinne Links Norma Medj.bane Medj. felt Først.tj. 1 2 1 324 324 82 18 2 548 548 2 91 31 1 3 2 3 619 619 97 103 41 61 15 16 4 761 761 89 165 33 88 94 65 5 604 604 38 116 30 56 335 239 AG3 100 100 1 4 ER 452 452 114 18 1 HK416 109 109 1 5 4 2 3 1 J 368 368 110 13 R 392 392 139 16 1 1 V55 383 383 11 16 1 61 39 V65 372 372 1 10 18 29 14 V73 317 317 5 9 32 16 Å 2 2 1 Total 5351 5351 1 227 952 252 207 574 395 3 Deltakerstatistikk Landsskytterstevnet 2015 Lesja Skogsløp Kvinne Mann Total SAG31 1 14 15 SENA 21 34 55 SENB 7 65 72 SER 17 36 53 SHK4161 1 24 25 SJ 25 46 71 SK 9 24 33 SR 23 46 69 SV55 15 15 SV65 16 16 Total 104 320 424 Deltakerstatistikk Landsskytterstevnet 2015 Lesja Klasse Samlag 1 2 3 4 5 AG3 ER HK416 J R V55 V65 V73 Å Total Agder 4 4 11 11 12 1 6 4 4 7 3 8 75 Akershus 24 29 28 40 45 12 26 5 26 16 11 12 9 283 Aust-Agder 12 12 8 5 3 4 3 6 2 3 58 Aust-Finnmark 1 1 2 1 5 Drammen 4 14 10 12 11 1 5 4 7 8 5 9 6 96 Follo 9 18 14 23 20 19 14 8 7 9 9 150 Fosen 7 18 16 15 8 1 5 10 11 10 11 4 116 Gauldal 10 13 26 10 11 11 6 9 5 8 9 118 Gudbrandsdal 10 33 39 30 18 3 24 7 29 43 11 16 13 1 277 Hallingdal 11 8 6 15 13 10 4 4 8 10 7 96 Hardanger og Voss 5 10 14 14 10 7 9 8 12 9 9 107 Hedmark 19 27 14 17 26 16 1 7 21 2 16 7 173 Hitra og Frøya 3 1 3 3 1 1 12 Hordaland 11 18 32 31 33 1 31 9 11 11 17 14 22 1 242 Inntrøndelag 9 19 21 20 7 10 9 7 10 19 15 146 Lofoten 1 1 Namdal 9 15 10 9 13 7 7 8 4 18 10 110 Nord-Østerdal 1 16 22 23 12 12 11 13 14 10 12 146 Nordfjord
    [Show full text]