DOCSLIB.ORG

Irrigation Systems Audits in Epirus and Western Greece

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Irrigation Systems Audits in Epirus and Western Greece Efficient Irrigation Management Tools for Agricultural Cultivations and Urban Landscapes IRMA Irrigation Systems Audits in Epirus and Western Greece WP5, Action 5.2. Deliverable 3 www.irrigation-management.eu 1 Front page back [intentionally left blank] 2 IRMA info European Territorial Cooperation Programmes (ETCP) GREECE-ITALY 2007-2013 www.greece-italy.eu Efficient Irrigation Management Tools for Agricultural Cultivations and Urban Landscapes (IRMA) www.irrigation-management.eu 3 IRMA partners LP, Lead Partner, TEIEP Technological Educational Institution of Epirus http://www.teiep.gr, http://research.teiep.gr P2, AEPDE Olympiaki S.A., Development Enterprise of the Region of Western Greece http://www.aepde.gr P3, INEA / P7, CRA Ιnstituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria http://www.inea.it P4, ISPA-CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - Istituto di Scienze delle Produzioni Alimentari http://www.ispa.cnr.it/ P5, ROP Regione di Puglia http://www.regione.puglia.it P6, ROEDM Decentralised Administration of Epirus–Western Macedonia http://www.apdhp-dm.gov.gr 4 Deliverable 5.2.3. Irrigation Audits in Greece (100x) Involved partners: TEIEP (LP) Authoring team: TEIEP support team: Dr. Myriounis Christos, Geologist – Rural & Dr. Tsirogiannis I.L., Dr. Varras G., Dr. Surveyor Engineer, TEIEP Barouchas P., Dr. Malamos N., Fotia K. Mr. Giotis Dimitrios, Agronomist MSc, TEIEP Place and time: Arta, 2015 European Territorial Cooperation Programmes (ETCP) GREECE-ITALY 2007-2013 www.greece-italy.eu Efficient Irrigation Management Tools for Agricultural Cultivations and Urban Landscapes (IRMA) www.irrigation-management.eu 5 Publication info WP5: Irrigation management tools Deliverable 5.2.3. Irrigation Audits in Greece (100x) The work that is presented in this ebook has been co- financed by EU / ERDF (75%) and national funds of Greece and Italy (25%) in the framework of the European Territorial Cooperation Programme (ETCP) GREECE-ITALY 2007-2013 (www.greece-italy.eu): IRMA project (www.irrigation-management.eu), subsidy contract no: I3.11.06. © This open access ebook is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) license and is freely accessible online to anyone. Disclaimer Recommendations and projections from this technical guide are based on mathematical models and their accuracy depends upon the quality of measurements and data provided by each individual user. Projections of water use and computed irrigation schedules should always verified and calibrated against actual conditions. The IRMA project and all the linked legal entities and persons make no warranty, implied or expressed, as to the results obtained from these procedures. 6 Talk about irrigation audits and this specific report, provide comments and new information You are welcome at the special for audits page in IRMA's forum. Insert the following URL to your web browser http://www.irrigation-management.eu/forumx/irrigation-audits or scan the QRcode to get there . 7 This report refers to the Deliverable 3 of the Work Package 5 of the Action 5.2 of IRMA research program that is co-financed by EU / ERDF (75%) and national funds of Greece and Italy (25%) in the framework of the European Territorial Cooperation Programme (ETCP) GREECE-ITALY 2007-2013. The project team, which was worked for this report, is presented below. Christos Myriounis Project Director Geologist – Rural & Surveyor Engineer Dr. Hydrogeology- Groundwater hydraulics P. Tsaldari 17, 46100, Igoumenitsa, tel. +302665100220 email. [email protected] Dimitris Giotis Director for Perf. Epirus and W.Greece Agronomist MSc Agrochemistry and biological cultivations Smirnis 20, Arta, tel +302681027167 email. [email protected] Aikaterini Chioteli Director for Perf. Epirus and W.Greece Agronomist – Landscape architect Dr. Landscape architecture Μ. Kotopouli 66-68, email. [email protected] Aikaterini Gkoltsiou Director for Perf. Epirus and W.Greece Argonomist – Landscape Architect Dr. Geography Univ. Aegean D. Psatha 10, Melissia, 15127 tel. +302106136246 email. [email protected] Aikaterini Kefi Director for Perf. Epirus and W.Greece Agronomist Imaret Arta, 47100 email. [email protected] Aglaia Karamani Field Recorder Floriculture-Landscape Architecture Analipsis 196, Prebeza tel. +302682025640 email. [email protected] Dimitris Myriounis Field Recorder Agronomist Pargis 5, 46100,Igoumenitsa tel. +302665101544 email. [email protected] Konstantinos Field Recorder Christodoulou Dep. Irrigation and Water Resources Sokratous 32 & Feidou, Kastelokampos Patron, tel. +302610910776 email. [email protected] Eleni Lampraki Field Recorder Floriculture-Landscape Architecture Τεχνολόγος Γεωπόνος, Τμήμα Α.Α.Τ. ΤΕΙ Ηπείρου Agiou Markou 9, Arta, 47100 email. [email protected] Vasileios Koulos Chemist Koboti Artas, 47040 Vasiliki Vasila Mechanical engineer St. Eirinis 102, Preveza, 48100, tel +302682024742 email. [email protected] 8 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 15 General ................................................................................................................................ 15 Water regions of Greece ........................................................................................................ 17 Irrigation Systems Performance in Greece ............................................................................... 18 Irrigation water needs theory ................................................................................................. 22 Irrigation needs in crops ..................................................................................................... 22 Irrigation needs in landscapes ............................................................................................. 24 Irrigation efficiency – Uniformity ............................................................................................ 26 Irrigation scheduling.............................................................................................................. 29 Crop water requirements ................................................................................................... 29 Estimating Evapotranspiration ............................................................................................ 30 Soil-water Storage ............................................................................................................. 30 Allowable Soil Water Depletion ........................................................................................... 32 The water budget procedure .............................................................................................. 32 Irrigation Auditing procedure ..................................................................................................... 35 General ................................................................................................................................ 35 Site Inspection ................................................................................................................... 35 Performance Testing .......................................................................................................... 35 Irrigation scheduling .......................................................................................................... 37 Equipment for Irrigation Auditing ........................................................................................... 38 Audit procedure .................................................................................................................... 39 Analytical procedures in irrigation auditing ............................................................................. 42 General ............................................................................................................................. 42 Conducting an Irrigation Audit ............................................................................................ 42 Audit Results ..................................................................................................................... 43 Pump Systems ................................................................................................................... 44 Factors for quantification of an efficient irrigation operation .................................................... 45 Study area ................................................................................................................................ 47 Region of Epirus .................................................................................................................... 49 Region of Western Greece ..................................................................................................... 49 Climatic conditions ................................................................................................................ 49 Soil parameters..................................................................................................................... 54 Auditing procedures in study areas ............................................................................................. 60 General ................................................................................................................................ 60 Irrigation audits in farm fields ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report to the Greek Government on the Visit to Greece Carried out by The
    CPT/Inf (2014) 26 Report to the Greek Government on the visit to Greece carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 16 April 2013 The Greek Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2014) 27. Strasbourg, 16 October 2014 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................5 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................6 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................6 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................7 C. Consultations held by the delegation.......................................................................................9 D. Cooperation between the CPT and the Greek authorities ....................................................9 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .......................10 F. National Preventive Mechanism ............................................................................................11 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................12 A. Treatment of persons detained by the police........................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Venice – Corfu
    ANEK LINES ROUTES FROM ITALY TO CORFU SCHEDULE 2018 IMPORTANT NOTICE: TIMES ARE INDICATED ON LOCAL TIME! VENICE - IGOUMENITSA From 01/01/2018 to 19/05/2018 and from 29/09/2018 to 31/12/2018 Days VENICE Departure IGOUMENITSA Arrival(1) Wed, Sat, Sun 12:00 14:30 (1) The following day VENICE – CORFU - IGOUMENITSA From 20/05/2018 to 28/06/2018 and from 10/09/2018 to 28/09/2018 Days VENICE Departure CORFU Arrival IGOUMENITSA Arrival(1) Wed, Sat 12:00 - 14:30 Fri 12:00 13:45 15:00 (1) The following day *SUNDAY 23/09: VENICE (DEPARTURE 12:00) – IGOUMENITSA (ARRIVAL 14:30 24/09) – PATRAS (ARRIVAL 21:00 24/09) VENICE - IGOUMENITSA From 29/06/2018 to 09/09/2018 Days VENICE Departure IGOUMENITSA Arrival(1) Wed, Sat 12:00 14:30 (1) The following day ANCONA - IGOUMENITSA From 01/01/2018 to 28/06/2018 and from 10/09/2018 to 31/12/2018 Days ANCONA Departure IGOUMENITSA Arrival Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri 13:30 08:00(1) Sat, Sun 16:30 09:30(1) (1)The following day. WEDNESDAY 03/01, THURSDAY 04/01 & FRIDAY 05/01 ANCONA (DEP. 16:30) – IGOUM. (ARR. 09:30) – PATRAS (ARR. 15:00 THE FOLLOWING DAY) ANCONA – CORFU - IGOUMENITSA From 29/06/2018 to 09/09/2018 Days ANCONA Departure CORFU Arrival(1) IGOUMENITSA Arrival(1) Mon, Wed, Fri, Sun 13:30 - 06:30 13:30 05:30 06:45 Tue 16:30 - 09:30 15:00 07:00 08:15 Thu 16:30 - 09:30 13:30 - 06:30 Sat 16:30 - 09:30 (1)The following day.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Archaeology in the Territory of Nikopolis
    Landscape Archaeology in the Territory of Nikopolis ]mnes Wiseman Introduction* study seasons in Epirus in 1995 and 1996; research and analyses of the primary data The Nikopolis Project is an interdisci­ have continued since that time, along with plinary archaeological investigation which the writing of reports. The survey zone has as its broad, general aim the explana­ (Figs. 1, 2) extends from the straits of Ac­ tion of the changing relationships between tium at the entrance to the Ambracian humans and the landscape they inhabited Gulf north to Parga, and from the Louros and exploited in southern Epirus, fi.·om river gorge to the Ionian seacoast, includ­ Palaeolithic to Mediaeval times. 1 Specifi­ ing the entire nomos (administrative dis­ cally, the Project has employed intensive trict) of Preveza, a modern town on the archaeological survey2 and geological in­ Nikopolis peninsula. On the east the sur­ vestigations3 to determine patterns of hu­ vey zone extended along the northern man activity, and to reconstruct what the coast of the Ambracian Gulf into the landscape was like in which those activi­ nornos of Arta, so that the deltaic, lagoonal ties took place. This undertaking in land­ area of the Louros river was included, but scape archaeology has led to new insights not the city of Arta (the ancient Ambra­ into the factors that underlie changes in cia). Since the survey zone is about 1,200 human-land relationships, in son1.e in­ square kilometers, far too large an area for stances over a short time-span, but partic­ a complete intensive survey, we chose to ularly over the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Annual 2014 Greece
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 11/4/2014 GAIN Report Number: IT14107 Greece Post: Rome Citrus Annual 2014 Report Categories: Citrus Approved By: Christine Sloop Prepared By: Ornella Bettini Report Highlights: Greece’s MY 2014/15 orange production is forecast to decrease by approximately 12 percent compared to the previous year because of the heavy rainfall which occurred in May and June. Greece’s MY 2014/15 tangerine, lemon, and grapefruit productions are forecast to remain steady. Greece is a large importer of lemons. In MY 2013/14, Greece imported 21,307 MT of lemons, mainly from Argentina (7,863 MT), Turkey (4,039 MT), and Italy (4,006 MT). Oranges Table 1: Area (Ha), Production (MT), and Processing (MT) 2012 2013 2014 Estimates Estimates Forecast Oranges 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Post Data Post Data Post Data Area Planted 35,261 36,500 36,500 Area Harvested 33,463 34,638 34,600 Production 930,000 970,000 850,000 For Processing 130,000 135,000 170,000 Source: Greek industry PRODUCTION Greece’s MY 2014/15 orange production is forecast to decrease by approximately 12 percent compared to the previous year, because of the heavy rainfall which occurred in May and June. Peloponnese and Aitoloakarnaia (western Greece) are the main orange-producing areas. Washington Navel, Commons, Valencia, Navelina, and Newhall are the leading orange varieties grown in Greece. CONSUMPTION Most oranges are consumed fresh (channeled to open markets and grocery stores).
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Study of Syvota
    Balancing Economic Development and Environmental Planning for Tourism in Rural Europe DDIIAAGGNNOOSSTTIICC SSTTUUDDYY OOFF SSYYVVOOTTAA September 2001 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER A. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE OF THE AREA 2 A.1. Socio-economic Structure 2 A.1.1 Population – Trends 2 A.1.2 Economic Activities 3 A.1.3. Tourism – In-depth Analysis 6 A.1.3.1 Supply 6 A.1.3.2. Demand 10 A.1.3.3 Problems 13 A.2. Environmental Protection 13 A.2.1 Designated areas 13 A.2.2. Designated settlements, buildings, monuments 14 A.2.3. Other areas of interest 14 A.3 Access and Accessibility 15 A.4. Stakeholder Analysis 16 A.4.1 Public Authorities 16 A.4.2 NGOs 17 CHAPTER B. THE PLANNING STATUS OF THE AREA 18 B.1 The Structure of settlements 18 B.2 Position of settlements in the regional urban network 19 B.3 The Town Plan 19 CHAPTER C. SWOT ANALYSIS 23 CHAPTER D CONFLICT ANALYSIS – SYVOTA 25 Maps of Land Uses 28 References 29 i LIST OF MAPS Map 1: The village of Syvota and its position in Epirus 1 Map 2: The Prefecture of Thesprotia 1 LIST OF TABLES Table A.1.1. Population of the Prefecture of Thesprotia per Municipality and Community (1971-2001) 2 Table A.1.2. Population of the Municipality of Syvota per Community (1971-2001) 3 Table A.1.3. Employment in the Municipality of Syvota per Economic Sector (1991) 3 Table A.1.4. Agricultural Production in the Municipality of Syvota 4 Table A.1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Parga Hellas
    Balancing Economic Development and Environmental Planning for Tourism in Rural Europe DDIIAAGGNNOOSSTTIICC RREEPPOORRTT OOFF PPAARRGGAA September 2001 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER A. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE OF THE AREA 2 A.1. Location A.2. Socio-economic Structure 3 A.2.1 Population – Trends 3 A.2.2 Economic Activities 4 A.2.3. Tourism – In depth Analysis 8 A.2.3.1 Supply 8 A.2.3.2. Tourist Demand 13 A.2.3.3 Problems in the tourism sector 15 A.3. Environmental Protection 16 A.3.1 Designated areas 16 A.3.2. Designated settlements, buildings and monuments 16 A.3.3. Other areas of interest 16 A.3.4. Conclusions 18 A.3.5. Environmental pollution 19 A.4 Access and Accessibility 20 A.5. Stakeholder Analysis 21 A.5.1 Public Authorities 21 A.5.2 NGOs 22 CHAPTER B. THE PLANNING STATUS OF THE AREA 23 B.1 The Structure of settlements 23 B.2 Position of settlements in the regional urban network 23 B.3 The Town Plan 23 CHAPTER C. SWOT ANALYSIS 25 CHAPTER D CONFLICT ANALYSIS 27 Maps of Land Uses 30 References 31 ii LIST OF MAPS Map 1: The Prefecture of Preveza in Epirus 2 Map 2: The Municipality of Parga in Epirus 2 LIST OF TABLES Table A.2.1. Population per Municipality in the Prefecture of Preveza (1961-2001) 3 Table A.2.2. Population per village in the Municipality of Parga (1961-2001) 4 Table A.2.3. Employment per economic sector for the Municipality of Parga (1991) 4 Table A.2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Ioannina a Multicultural City…
    Welcome to Ioannina The city of Giannina, attraction of thousands of tourists every year from Greece and around the world, awaits the visitor to accommodate him with the Epirus known way, suggesting him to live a unique combination of rich past and impressive present. Built next to the legendary lake Pamvotis at 470 meters altitude, in the northwest of Greece, it is the biggest city of Epirus and one of the most populous in the country. History walks beside you through the places, the impressive landscape that combines mountain and water, museums with unique exhibits and monuments also waiting to lead you from the Antiquity to the Middle Byzantine and Late Byzantine period, the Turks, Modern History. And then ... the modern city with modern structures (University, Hospital, Airport, Modern Highway - Egnatia - Regional, local and long distance transportation, Spiritual and Cultural Centres) offer a variety of events throughout the year. Traditional and modern market, various entertainment options, dining and accommodation. A multicultural city… Ioannina arise multiculturally and multifacetedly not only through narrations. Churches with remarkable architecture, mosques and a synagogue, the largest in Greece, testify the multicultural character of the city. The coexistence of Christians, Muslims and Jews was established during the administration of Ali Pasha. The population exchange after the Minor Asia destruction and annihilation of most Jews by the Germans changed the proportions of the population. Muslims may not exist today and the Jews may be few, only those who survived the concentration camps, but the city did not throw off this part of the identity. Today, there are four mosques, three of them very well preserved, while the Jewish synagogue, built in 1826, continues to exist and be the largest and most beautiful of the surviving religious buildings of the Greek Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • HSTCQE=VV^Z\Y: Education Policy Advice for Greece
    Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education StrongPerformers Successfuland EducationReformers in Education Policy Advice for Greece The future of Greece’s well-being will depend on improving educational performance to boost productivity Strong Performers and and improve social outcomes. In the current economic context, with the need to get best value for spending, Greece must and can address ineffi ciencies in its education system. Successful Reformers in Education The challenges are signifi cant. For example, Greece lags behind many OECD countries in performance on PISA, including countries with the same or lower levels of expenditure per student as well as countries with the same and lower levels of economic development. Salary costs per student are above the OECD Education Policy Advice average, mostly because Greek teachers have less teaching time and Greece has smaller classes. A smaller percentage of students who enter tertiary education complete a fi rst degree within the statutory study time than in any other country in Europe. for Greece To address the challenges, the Greek government has established a bold agenda and sought advice from a task force on the development and implementation of reform proposals that refl ect best practices in OECD countries. This report provides the outcomes of the work of the task force. It presents a roadmap for how the reforms can be successfully implemented, with pointers to relevant experience in other countries. As a contribution to the on-going policy discussions in Greece, it recommends specifi c short-, medium- and long-term actions that can improve effi ciency in the country’s education system.
    [Show full text]
  • Refurbishing the City's Bike Sharing System
    REFURBISHING THE CITY’S BIKE SHARING SYSTEM Igoumenitsa, Greece By SUMPORT project KEY FEATURES Challenges Main Objectives ⎯ Traffic congestions during the ⎯ Reduce use of private cars summer/tourist season ⎯ Reduce air and noise pollution ⎯ Excessive use of private cars ⎯ Encourage citizens to use alternative ⎯ Parking problems mobility modes Investment/Maintenance Costs Impacts & Results ⎯ Extension and renewal of the bike ⎯ Decrease total number of private sharing system in Igoumenitsa vehicles € 30.367,97 ⎯ Increase in the use of bikes ⎯ Mid-term report on the extension of bike ⎯ Change mobility patterns of citizens sharing in Igoumenitsa 2.500 € ⎯ Final testing report on the extension of the bike sharing in Igoumenitsa 2.500 € REFURBISHING THE CITY’S BIKE SHARING SYSTEM Igoumenitsa, Greece By SUMPORT project CONTEXT As part of the SUMPORT project, the Greek partners involved have worked on extending the ​ basic principles of sustainable mobility in the Regional Unit of Thesprotia (RUTH) as a ​ functional area, in order to improve cities mobility conditions, answering the particular mobility needs of the population and fostering economic development. This was a challenging task due to the fact that those principles applicable to urban areas had to cover a larger area. Moreover, there is no rail infrastructure in the Region of Epirus, which also experiences significant problems with urban public transport, lack of cooperation with tour operators, high car usage, limited network and infrastructure for bikes, and lack of experience in mobility planning. In this framework, the city of Igoumenitsa developed a winning mobility measure: the ​ refurbishing of the old bike sharing system. SUMPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMPORT project aimed to increase the planning capacities on sustainable mobility of port cities through training activities and exchange of experience.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th Annual General Assembly Filippiada 21-22 April 2018
    5TH ANNUAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE NETWORK OF CITIES WITH LAKES FILIPPIADA 21-22 APRIL 2018 Honored guests, We are delighted and honored to welcome you to the Municipality of Ziros, within the context of the work of the 4th General Assembly of the Network of Cities with lakes and rivers. An event of great importance for our area and for the lake network. MAP The distinctive natural beauty and the local legends of Ziros Lake are particularly highlighted AN IMAGE OF THE TOUR by the rebirth of nature, brought on by Spring.. This is the lake that has given its name to our Kallikratian Municipality and which expresses and embraces the vision, for development 1. Hotel Iliana based on modern entrepreneurship by the municipal authority and of the entire local community. 2. Ancient Orraon (guided tour) As a municipal authority, we seek to make the most of the potential and dynamics of Lake 3. Settlement of Gymnotopos Ziros, as well as the sections of the rivers Louros and Acheron, that run through our Municipality. We have taken a number of initiatives in this direction and despite the 4. Settlement of Dryophyto obstacles that we face, we continue to take steps forward. 5. Watermill of Agios Georgios - St. George We will soon be building a swimming area with platforms on Lake Ziros. We are also planning other interventions, on a smaller scale. Our aim is for Ziros Lake with its natural 6. Platain Forest beauty, to become known and to be an attraction for visitors and tourists. Already a stone path has been built for safety reasons in the lakes forest .
    [Show full text]
  • T.2.1. the Action Plan
    T.2.1. The Action Plan PP4 IGOUMENITSA PORT AUTHORITY S.A. Document Control Sheet Project number: ADRION504 Project acronym NEWBRAIN Project Title Nodes Enhancing Waterway bridging Adriatic-Ionian Network Start of the project December 2017 Duration 24 months Related activity: T2.1 – Detailed action plan definition in each node Deliverable name: The Action Plan – PP4 IGOUMENITSA PORT AUTHORITY S.A. Type of deliverable Report Language English Work Package Title Preparation of investments for the strategy implementation Work Package number T2 Work Package Leader Institute for Transport and Logistics Foundation - ITL Status Final Author (s) OLIG S.A. & Living Prospects Ltd (external contractor) Version 3 Due date of deliverable 15th February 2019 Delivery date T2.1 – Detailed action plan definition in each node INDEX 1. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. THE TERRITORIAL, ECONOMIC AND LOGISTIC CONTEXT OF THE NODE .................................................. 8 3. THE LOGISTICS NODE AND ITS MAIN NEEDS .......................................................................................... 18 4. THE ROLE OF THE NODE IN LOCAL NETWORKS ...................................................................................... 21 5. THE ROLE OF THE NODE IN THE TEN-T NETWORK ................................................................................. 24 6. BOTTLENECKS ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Provisioning| 4.1.1
    Project Title: Towards a Common Quality Control and food chain traceability system for the Greek – Italian primary sector of activity Deliverable Title: Maps Provisioning| 4.1.1. Part A. Field data survey and first level analysis Author : TEI of Epirus (LP) Type : Document/ Software /Content Document Reference : Internal / Draft / Final Version : 02 Date : December 15, 2013 AGRO Quality D.4.4.1 Maps Provisioning Control Page Deliverable Number D.4.1.1 Corresponding WP 4 Title Special Purpose GIS development Corresponding Action 4.1. Title Users requirements gathering and functionality Responsible Partner: TEI of Epirus (LP) Working Group Part A. Field data survey and first level analysis Kaltsis Ioannis Papantoniou Trifonas Zampounis Vassilios Lambraki Eleni Myriounis Christos Scientific Coordinator: Georgios Manos, Tsirogiannis Ioannis Creation Date: 01/09/2013 Last Update: 01/09/2013 Type: Document Version: 1 Modification Control VERSION DATE COMMENTARY/STATUS AUTHOR 1 1/9/2013 First draft TEI of Epirus (LP), Kaltsis Ioannis, Papantoniou Trifonas, Zampounis Vassilios, Final (Part A. Field data survey 2 15/12/2013 Lambraki Eleni, Myriounis and first level analysis) Christos Page 2 AGRO Quality D.4.4.1 Maps Provisioning Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................5 2 AGROQuality Maps ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]