DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to the Greek Government on the Visit to Greece Carried out by The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to the Greek Government on the Visit to Greece Carried out by The CPT/Inf (2014) 26 Report to the Greek Government on the visit to Greece carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 16 April 2013 The Greek Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2014) 27. Strasbourg, 16 October 2014 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................5 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................6 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................6 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................7 C. Consultations held by the delegation.......................................................................................9 D. Cooperation between the CPT and the Greek authorities ....................................................9 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .......................10 F. National Preventive Mechanism ............................................................................................11 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................12 A. Treatment of persons detained by the police........................................................................12 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................12 2. Ill-treatment .....................................................................................................................12 3. Safeguards against ill-treatment ......................................................................................19 a. notification of custody............................................................................................19 b. access to a lawyer...................................................................................................20 c. access to a doctor ...................................................................................................21 d. information on rights..............................................................................................22 e. conduct of interrogations........................................................................................22 f. custody records.......................................................................................................23 B. Conditions of detention in police and border guard stations..............................................24 1. Police detention facilities in the Attika region ................................................................24 2. Police detention facilities in Central Macedonia, Epirus and Thessaly regions..............26 3. Police and border guard stations in East Macedonia and Thrace region.........................27 4. Issues affecting all police and border guard stations: food and hygiene, medical care and staffing ...................................................................29 5. Action to be taken............................................................................................................31 C. Conditions of detention in establishments under the Port Authorities..............................32 - 3 - D. Immigration detention centres...............................................................................................34 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................34 a. legislation ...............................................................................................................34 b. recent policy developments....................................................................................35 c. pre-departure centres and holding facilities visited ...............................................36 2. Ill-treatment .....................................................................................................................38 3. Conditions of detention ...................................................................................................40 a. pre-departure centres..............................................................................................40 b. special holding facilities for irregular migrants .....................................................42 4. Unaccompanied minors ...................................................................................................44 5. Staffing ............................................................................................................................47 6. Health-care.......................................................................................................................48 7. Other issues......................................................................................................................49 E. Prison establishments .............................................................................................................52 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................52 2. Ill-treatment .....................................................................................................................53 3. Conditions of detention ...................................................................................................55 a. material conditions .................................................................................................56 b. regime.....................................................................................................................60 4. Health-care services.........................................................................................................62 a. introduction ............................................................................................................63 b. health-care in general .............................................................................................63 c. medical screening upon admission.........................................................................66 d. HIV positive prisoners ...........................................................................................67 e. drug treatment ........................................................................................................68 f. medical confidentiality...........................................................................................69 5. Other issues......................................................................................................................70 a. prison staff..............................................................................................................70 b. reception and induction procedures .......................................................................72 c. discipline and segregation ......................................................................................72 d. searches ..................................................................................................................74 e. contact with the outside world ...............................................................................75 f. transport of prisoners..............................................................................................76 g. foreign national prisoners.......................................................................................76 - 4 - APPENDIX I: List of the CPT’s recommendations, comments and requests for information ................78 APPENDIX II: List of the national authorities and organisations met by the CPT's delegation ..............93 - 5 - Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report Mr Iraklis Asteriadis Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative of Greece to the Council of Europe 21 place Broglie 67000 Strasbourg Strasbourg, 25 July 2013 Dear Ambassador, In pursuance of Article 10, paragraph 1, of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, I enclose herewith the report to the Government of Greece drawn up by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) following its visit to Greece from 4 to 16 April 2013. The report was adopted by the CPT at its 81st meeting, held from 1 to 5 July 2013. The recommendations, comments and requests for information formulated by the CPT are listed in Appendix I of the report. The CPT requests the authorities of Greece to provide within six months a response giving a full account of action taken to implement the Committee’s recommendations as well as reactions and replies to the comments and requests for information. In respect of the recommendations and requests for information contained in paragraphs 16, 17, 24, 44, 64, 80, 99 and 108.i., the CPT requests that a response be provided within three months. I am at your entire disposal if you have any questions concerning either the CPT’s report or the future procedure. Yours sincerely, Lətif Hüseynov President of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Piraeus Case Report Consolidated 30062015
    Piraeus Case Report Evi Georgaki, N. Hlepas University of Athens Municipality of Piraeus Evi Georgaki, N. Hlepas Contents Abstract..........................................................................................................................6 Introduction....................................................................................................................6 Types of sources - The empirical corpus of the Piraeus case.....................................6 Socioeconomic features of the Municipal of Piraeus ....................................................7 General Information ...................................................................................................7 Municipal History ....................................................................................................10 Economic features....................................................................................................12 The Municipality of Piraeus: Political leadership and the fiscal problem...................15 Party political landscape and the political leadership of the municipality 2006-2014 ..................................................................................................................................15 Local Elections: 15 and 22 October 2006 ............................................................15 th Parliamentary Elections, 16 of September 2007 ................................................16 th Parliamentary Elections, 4 of October 2009.......................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Greek Government on the Visits to Greece Carried
    CPT/Inf (2017) 25 Report to the Greek Government on the visits to Greece carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 13 to 18 April and 19 to 25 July 2016 The Greek Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2017) 26. Strasbourg, 26 September 2017 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................5 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................7 A. Dates of the visits and composition of the delegations...........................................................7 B. Context of the visits...................................................................................................................7 C. Consultations held by the delegations and cooperation encountered ..................................9 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .......................10 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISITS AND ACTION PROPOSED ............................11 A. Reception and Identification Centres (so-called “hotspots”)..............................................11 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Youth for Social and Solidarity Economy - (YSEE)
    Youth for Social and Solidarity Economy - (YSEE) Training Course KA1 – Erasmus + project Monday 03 September 2018 (Arrival) – Monday 10 September 2018 (Departure) 6 working days, 7 nights Florina, Greece Dear friends, We are looking forward to meeting you all in Florina! Here you will find some important information for your travel arrangements and your stay in our city. Description of the project Youth for Social and Solidarity Economy is an innovative Erasmus+ project, promoting the good practices in the social and solidarity economy amongst European countries. This project aims at enhancing the mobility of youth workers and youth leaders with previous experience on social economy, future youth leaders, already active or potential social entrepreneurs who are willing to share knowledge, experiences, and good practices on the theme. Participants can further inspire the young people they are working with, to become more active on the field of social economy. Furthermore, the project aims at supporting the participants on developing business models that have the potential to solve social problems and support vulnerable groups of people. Association of Active Youths of Florina (OENEF) NGO's and Associations have major part in raising the awareness about social entrepreneurship. We wanted to gather people (youth workers, your leaders, youngsters with entrepreneurial spirit) to start to work on the topic of social entrepreneurship. We want to match people with same interest and work together on something concrete - international platform where in future will be provided information about the social entrepreneurship. The aim of the project is: to ensure an entrepreneurial approach to solving social and environmental problems in the countries part of the project and to encourage and support the development of a new generation of social entrepreneurs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/860 of 18 June 2020 Amending the Annex to Implementing
    L 195/94 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.6.2020 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/860 of 18 June 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 4177) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (3), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU (4) lays down animal health control measures in relation to African swine fever in certain Member States, where there have been confirmed cases of that disease in domestic or feral pigs (the Member States concerned). The Annex to that Implementing Decision demarcates and lists certain areas of the Member States concerned in Parts I to IV thereof, differentiated by the level of risk based on the epidemiological situation as regards that disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Reported Varied Treatment by Turkish Authorities During Their Journey And/Or Pushback
    GREECE: VIOLENCE, LIES, AND PUSHBACKS REFUGEES AND MIGRANTS STILL DENIED SAFETY AND ASYLUM AT EUROPE'S BORDERS Amnesty International is a movement of 10 million people which mobilizes the humanity in everyone and campaigns for change so we can all enjoy our human rights. Our vision is of a world where those in power keep their promises, respect international law and are held to account. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and individual donations. We believe that acting in solidarity and compassion with people everywhere can change our societies for the better. © Amnesty International 2021 Cover photo: “Two migrants are detained by Greek Police, near the village of Kavyli, in Evros, close to the Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Greek-Turkish borders, on 03 March 2020” © Achilleas Chiras/NurPhoto via Getty Images/ (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2020 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: EUR 25/4307/2021 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 2. METHODOLOGY 8 3. THE DE FACTO POLICY OF GREEK BORDER CONTROL: PUSHBACKS 10 3.1 BACKGROUND 10 3.2 “UNOFFICIAL” POLICIES AND SYSTEMIC PRACTICES OF EXPULSION 12 3.3 NO ACCESS TO ASYLUM OR DUE PROCESS 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Podarcis Peloponnesiacus
    All_SHORT_nOTES:SHORT_nOTE.qxd 08.02.2017 16:01 Seite 8 190 SHORT nOTE HERpETOZOA 29 (3/4) Wien, 30. Jänner 2017 SHORT nOTE SUBMITTED: February 11, 2016 in the south of the peloponnese, just 0.8 km AUTHORS: Yuval ITEScU (corresponding au - off the coastline ( BROGGI 2016 ). thor, < [email protected] >) 1) , Simon JAMISOn 1) , On June 22, 2014, during a field sur - Alex SlAvEnkO 1) , karin TAMAR 1, 2) , Stephanos A. ROUSSOS 3, 4) , Johannes FOUFOpOUlOS 5) , Shai MEIRI 1) vey of undeveloped natural habitat patches & panayiotis pAFIlIS 6) located in the greater Athens metropolitan 1) Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, area the authors recorded one specimen of Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel the peloponnesian Wall lizard in the District 2) The Steinhardt Museum of natural History of nikaia (located in the south-western sec - and national Research center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel tion of Athens, close to piraeus, prefecture 3) Department of Biological Sciences, Universi - of Attica; 37°58’22.84”n, 23°38’07.76”E). ty of north Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA The area constitutes an island of natural 4) Department of Biological Sciences, Texas vegetation, surrounded by an urban matrix Tech University, lubbock, TX 79409, USA 5) School of natural Resources and Environ - of buildings and streets ( clERGEAU et al. ment University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, 2004). During the survey of the fragment, MI 48109, USA which contained mostly patches of dense 6) Section of Zoology and Marine Biology, De - Avena sp. (poaceae) alternating with ex - partment of Biology, University of Athens, panepisti- mioupolis, Ilissia, Athens 157-84, Greece posed limestone rockfaces (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • (IAP) Kastoria (Greece), 14
    17TH WORKSHOP OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON TAXONOMY AND ECOLOGY (IAP) Kastoria (Greece), 14 - 21 September 2014 THIRD CIRCULAR Dear participants, We thank you for registering in the 17th Workshop of the International Association of Phytoplankton Taxonomy and Ecology (IAP) (14 - 21 September 2014, Kastoria, Greece). It is a pleasure that > 70 people will participate in the workshop with a total of more than 60 contributions. Plenary lectures will have 45 minutes for presentation and discussion. Oral contributions will have 20 minutes accordingly. Oral presentations should be prepared in MS PowerPoint (for Windows). If you have any special requirement please contact [email protected]. The posters will be displayed and presented during the workshop in special sessions. The time allocation for posters formal presentation is 2- 3 minutes plus the time for discussion in front of the poster panels during poster sessions. The posters may not exceed the following dimensions: 80 cm wide and 110 cm height. Each poster will be assigned with a number corresponding to one of the three poster sessions that will be held during the workshop. Publication A selection (according to standards of the journal) of papers presented at the IAP workshop will be published as a special issue of Hydrobiologia. Manuscripts for the special volume must be submitted by 30th of November 2014. Arrival and travel information The workshop will be hosted in the Limneon Resort and Spa (http://www.limneon.com) which is situated in Dispilio (7 km distance from the City of Kastoria). For those arriving to the international airport of Thessaloniki: • If you rent a car from the airport, you can take the Egnatia highway (Egnatia Odos) to Athens and then at a short distance after the Malgara tolls, you turn right for Veroia and then follow the signs to Kastoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Piraeus Port Authority S.A. Annual Financial Report
    PIRAEUS PORT AU THORITY S.A. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 (IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE L. 3556/2007) WorldReginfo - 4aac7156-b0aa-428d-be03-ee017797d73b PIRAEUS PORT AUTHORITY S.A Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 2018 (amounts in Euro unless stated otherwise) Index to the Annual Financial Report PAGE STATEMENTS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ....................................................................................................... 3 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS .............................................................................................................................. 4 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................................... 53 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ................................................................................................................................................. 61 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ................................................................. 67 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2018 .................................................................................................. 68 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ......................................................................... 69 CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter August 2011 – December 2011
    Program for the Education of Roma Children Regions of Central Macedonia, Western Macedonia, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace 21.09.2010 – 31.12.2013 Newsletter August 2011 – December 2011 Beginning of classes addressed Literacy courses for to students who had been grade adolescents retained in Dendropotamos, In the settlements of Agia Sofia Alexandria and Kymina- and Peraia, literacy courses for Malgara. illiterate Roma adolescents begin. A direct positive outcome of Three philologists and a support classes was that sixteen mathematician teach in these 3rd grade students of the Junior courses and 56 adolescents High School of Menemeni, in participate (Agia Sofia: 39 Dendropotamos passed to the 1st students, Peraia: 17 students). grade of Senior High School. The support for children in this transitory phase of their education is estimated to contribute to its continuation and completion. Thus, upon the children’s request and given the fact that support teaching is no longer offered to Junior and Senior High Schools, support classes are scheduled and take place during the whole academic year 2011-2012 in Junior and Senior High Schools in Menemeni, Alexandria, Kymina- Malgara and Kouloura October 2011 October 3 Introductory training for teachers in the primary schools and the kindergarten of Menemeni, in Dendropotamos. October 4 Introductory in-service training for teachers in the primary schools of Peraia and the cross-cultural primary school of Neoi Epivates. October 6 In-service training for philologists and mathematicians of the Program, regarding teaching approaches in mathematics and language. October 7 Introductory training in the primary and kindergarten schools of Veroia, Kouloura and Xehasmeni.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Pressure and Events in an Urban Setting
    Visitor Pressure and Events in an Urban Setting City Report - Tallinn, Estonia 2018 City Report -Tallinn, Estonia 2018 Centre of Expertise Leisure, Tourism & Hospitality Executive summary In the past years, the topic of visitor pressure and over-tourism in city destinations has reached worldwide media coverage. Although, it is very difficult to ascertain how and when visitor pressure becomes too high, preventing it should be a priority to city governments. Support of local residents is a prerequisite for sustainable tourism development. This report provides an overview of the current situation concerning visitor pressure in the city of Tallinn, as well as possible solutions and actions to be taken. The visitation of Tallinn increases year by year thus all the interviewed experts agreed that the problem of visitor pressure will not reduce but will increase in the near future. The number of visitors from international markets is continuously growing as well as the volume of cruise tourism. Restoration works in the Old Town and its surroundings are in progress allowing the visitors and the residents to use the town in various ways. Traffic regulations are ongoing however; the works will probably last for a couple of years before it is completed. Development and revitalization of neighbourhoods outside of the touristic hot spots are also in progress just like the development of the coastal area. Initiatives have been taken with regards to maximizing the economic benefits of tourism in connection to heritage protection, although such system is not in place yet. Communicating the financial and economic benefits of tourism towards the residents Colophon and creating wider awareness is also lacking.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Profile
    Company Profile DEPA at a glance The history of DEPA The natural gas system in Greece DEPA Group Strategic Goals of DEPA Legislative – regulative framework of natural gas Commercial activities of DEPA Sectors of natural gas consumption – Customers Distribution System Gas Supply Companies (EPAs) DEPA at the international setting Human resources Vision for sustainable development Corporate Social Responsibility The gas networks in Europe Statistics on natural gas and energy in Europe Financial statement 2010 >01 Natural gas is the fastest growing form of primary energy world-wide, given - on the one hand - its advantages compared to other forms of energy based on fossil fuels and - on the other hand - its decisive contribution in the defense of the necessary elements for Sustainable Development, i.e. “Environment, Society, Economy”. And this is because: • Natural gas allows greater energy efficiency compared to other fuels on all production segments, primarily for power generation using combined cycle technology, • Natural gas is more environmentally friendly since, per unit of energy produced, it is less damaging to the environment by 38% compared to coal, by 28% compared to crude oil and by 24% compared to diesel oil. Those percentages are in reality increased taking into account the greater efficiency rate of gas against the above fuels under comparison, • Natural gas provides greater flexibility as a fuel and is easy to use and handle in all domestic, commercial or industrial applications. The combination of all those characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • The Administration of Visit London
    Economy, Culture and Sport Committee The administration of Visit London July 2011 Economy, Culture and Sport Committee The administration of Visit London July 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority July 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN This publication is printed on recycled paper Economy, Culture and Sport Committee Members Dee Doocey (Chair) Liberal Democrat Len Duvall (Deputy Chair) Labour Tony Arbour Conservative John Biggs Labour Andrew Boff Conservative Victoria Borwick Conservative The Committee welcomes feedback on this report. For further information, contact Tim Jarvis on 020 7983 4390 or [email protected]. For press enquiries contact Alastair Cowan on 020 7983 4504 or [email protected] Contents Executive Summary 7 Introduction 9 The decision to create a single promotion agency for London 11 Taking forward the decision 19 The role of publicly funded private companies 27 Conclusion 33 Appendix 1 Timeline 34 Appendix 2 Recommendations 39 Appendix 3 Orders and translations 40 6 Executive Summary On 17 March 2011, the interim board of London and Partners, the Mayor’s new single promotion agency, decided not to take over Visit London’s role as participating employer in the British Tourist Board pension scheme. This decision left Visit London, one of the organisations London and Partners was to replace, with responsibility for the outstanding liabilities of this pension scheme. With insufficient assets to meet these liabilities, Visit London went into administration on 1 April 2011.
    [Show full text]