DOCSLIB.ORG

London Boroughs Healthy Streets Scorecard, Which Will Be Updated Annually, Aims to Help Answer These Questions and Promote Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Boroughs Healthy Streets Scorecard, Which Will Be Updated Annually, Aims to Help Answer These Questions and Promote Action LONDON GROUP London Boroughs HEALTHY STREETS Scorecard July 2019 Contents A. The scorecard and indicators B. The results C. What happens next? About us. Contact Annex 1 The indicators – detailed commentary on each indicator Annex 2: Overall scores and scores for each indicator Annex 2 Other actions boroughs could take to meet healthy streets targets Annex 3 More detail on air pollution and noise impacts of traffic 1 A. The scorecard and indicators The way we plan transport in London has an enormous impact on Londoners' health: • Air pollution Around half of London’s air pollution is caused by road transport. Toxic fumes from vehicles cause thousands of premature deaths every year and lead to young Londoners growing up with stunted lungs and suffering from asthma. • Inactive lifestyles Adults need just 20 minutes of moderate activity every day to stay physically and mentally healthy. Yet only 34% of adult Londoners are achieving this. This is partly because nearly 5 million daily journeys in London that could be walked or cycled are currently made by car. • Noise pollution Traffic is a major source of noise pollution in London. Environmental noise is the second largest environmental health risk in Western Europe behind poor air quality. • Road casualties In 2017, 3,881 people were killed or seriously injured (KSI) on London’s roads, including 131 fatalities. A further 28,000 people sustained what were classified as ‘slight’ injuries. More detail on the link between inactive lifestyles and transport as well as on road casualties, is set out in the discussion of the Scorecard indicators at Annex 1. For more on the health impacts of noise and air pollution, please see Annex 3. The Mayor’s Transport Strategy sets targets to deliver ‘healthy streets’. Transport for London and the Mayor of London’s Healthy Streets approach acknowledges research that shows if streets are safe and comfortable to walk, cycle and use public transport on, if they feature less car use and are greener, they result in better health outcomes. The Mayor’s Transport Strategy has three key targets. 1. To increase the trips made by ‘sustainable mode of transport’ (walking, cycling, public transport) from 63% to 80% by 2041. 2. For everyone to undertake the daily 20 minutes of active travel they need to stay healthy by 2041 3. Vision Zero for road danger: the elimination of all deaths and serious injuries on London’s transport system by 2041 London’s boroughs control 95% of London’s roads so the measures they implement are critical to whether the Mayor’s targets will be met or not. But what specific measures should boroughs be taking? And are they doing all they can? Our new London Boroughs Healthy Streets Scorecard, which will be updated annually, aims to help answer these questions and promote action. A coalition of environment and transport NGOs (see About Us) has come together to help councils and residents understand better where and how they can make an impact. Our aim is to update the scorecard site on an annual basis to track progress and change (the metrics used in the scorecard should be available updated annually). We also want to promote this approach beyond London to other cities and towns across the country. 2 We acknowledge that in the first edition there will be shortcomings and encourage feedback about the scorecard so that subsequent editions will be as valuable as possible. Not all key metrics (e.g. air pollution) are covered in this edition but the scorecard can be developed with help from those using the scorecard and modified and improved in future. Also, this is not intended to be a measure of borough performance against the 10 indicators set out in the Mayor’s healthy streets model. Rather, it reflects key Mayoral targets and interventions which the coalition believe provide a strong basis for improvement. Our scorecard sets out data to show (A) the health of each borough’s streets through ‘ouput’ indicators but also (B) the extent to which councils are putting in place four key measures which can make a real difference. (A) Output indicatorsThe Scorecard shows the health of each borough’s streets by looking at four key ‘output’ indicators: i. the proportion of trips made by ‘sustainable modes’ (walking, cycling, public transport) ii. active travel rate (the proportion of residents walking or cycling more than five times a week) iii. collisions resulting in serious or fatal injuries for active travellers, per million journey stages iv. car ownership rates, to ascertain the level of reliance on cars. (B) Input indicators The Scorecard also shows to what extent councils are putting in place four key measures (or ‘input’ indicators) which can help to deliver Healthy Streets, often with dramatic results: v. Low Traffic Neighbourhood schemes vi. 20mph speed limits vii. Controlled Parking Zones (CPZs) viii. Physically protected cycle track These four key measures have been chosen because they can have a big impact, and because it is realistic to expect all boroughs to be able to implement them. They are not currently being used routinely by London Boroughs so there is a huge opportunity to achieve dramatic results in a short space of time. The organisations in the London Boroughs Healthy Streets Scorecard Coalition, and the local groups we are associated with, are committed to supporting councils to implement the key measures. It is recognised that not everything is under boroughs’ control, most notably public transport, and that boroughs face financial constraints. It is also recognised that residents are often concerned that the proposed measures might make their lives harder rather than easier. Part of our job in supporting councils to implement these measures is to demonstrate more clearly to the public why they will be healthier and better off with the measures in place. 3 WHERE TO FIND THE DATA • A spreadsheet with the data is published alongside this report. Each tab on the spreadsheet shows the detail for each indicator including the source. The summary page shows how the overall scores were reached. • Annex 2 sets out summaries and graphs of the data for each indicator. We hope the scorecard helps boroughs to compare how well they are doing in relation to other boroughs and to identify areas for future action. As London is only just beginning the ‘Healthy Streets’ journey, our aim is to provide a benchmark or baseline for future action. It in no way seeks to criticise previous approaches. 4 B. Scorecard results One of the key aims of the project was to use publicly-available data that can be collected annually, with the aim that the scorecard data will updated regularly to allow us to track boroughs as they progress, year on year. NOTE: The City of London scores well in many indicators but it is not primarily a residential borough and it was felt that comparisons with the other London Boroughs may be unhelpful. So while the City’s scores are set out in the data and graphs and reflected in the commentary for all Inner London, this commentary does not always reflect the results from the City for individual indicators. OVERVIEW and SUMMARY The chart below shows the London Boroughs Healthy Streets Scorecard – OVERALL SCORES FOR 2019 (YELLOW = Outer London borough, BLUE = Inner London borough). The overall scores were derived by combining scores from the eight individual indicators. See Annex 2 (see p21) for charts, data sources and methodology for individual indicators and overall Healthy Streets Scorecard. 8.7 7.6 7.1 6.9 6.5 6.3 6.4 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.0 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.4 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.4 If we exclude the City of London, Tower Hamlets achieves the highest overall score followed by Camden and Hackney (with scores of over 6.5). The lowest scoring borough was Havering, Redbridge, Bexley, Bromley and Hillingdon (with scores of 2.0 and below). The range of results is very wide for all indicators even when looking just at Inner or Outer London boroughs (see Annex 2 for details) 5 • The proportion of trips made by ‘sustainable mode’ (i.e. public transport, walking or cycling) is just 41% in Hillingdon but 85% in the highest scoring borough Hackney. (The Mayor’s target is 75% in Outer London and 90% in Inner London by 2041.) • The proportion of people walking or cycling more than five times a week varies between 27% in Barking and Dagenham and 56% in Hackney. (The Mayor’s aim is, by 2041, for all Londoners to do at least the 20 minutes of active travel they need to stay healthy each day.) • The highest number of serious injuries for active travellers per million journey stages was in Hackney and was roughly three times the lowest rate in Greenwich. (In 2018, TfL launched its Vision Zero Action Plan to meet a target that, by 2041, no one would be killed or seriously injured on the road.) • There was a dramatic difference in reliance on cars with three and a half times more cars registered per household in Hillingdon (1.27) than in Islington (0.35). Though there is no Mayoral target for car ownership, this score reflects the extent to which people are reliant on cars In terms of the key measures that boroughs can implement to help reach the targets, the ‘input’ measures: • 20mph speed limits are widespread in some boroughs with nearly 100% of streets covered in Southwark, Hackney and Islington but only 10% of streets covered in many other boroughs including Bromley, Barnet and Kensington & Chelsea.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploring the Walking Near Market Presentation
    Exploring the walking near market 10077 April 2011 Confidentiality Please note that the copyright in the attached report is owned by TfL and the provision of information under Freedom of Information Act does not give the recipient a right to re-use the information in a way that would infringe copyright (for example, by publishing and issuing copies to the public). Brief extracts of the material may be reproduced under the fair dealing provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes, private study, criticism, review and news reporting. Details of the arrangements for reusing the material owned by TfL for any other purpose can be obtained by contacting us at [email protected]. Research conducted by 2CV 2 Contents Background Executive summary The walking near market in focus The decision making process for short trips Understanding the experience of behaviour change Opportunities for increasing walking 3 Background The Mayor’s Transport Strategy sets out the ambition to ‘deliver a step change in the experience of walking in London by making walking count’ (proposal 59). The Mayor’s target is to increase walking by 1%, or 57,000 trips a day by 2031 Previous qualitative research has armed TfL with insights on walking for both utility and leisure journeys; including the various motivations and barriers that exist simultaneously in people’s minds. These include Personal, Social and Environmental factors The findings of several studies in sustainable travel suggest that the same behaviour change model applies to walking as it does for most other transport/travel behaviour change.
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Advanced Spa Tial Analysis
    Paper 62 PEDESTRIAN DEMAND MODELLING OF LARGE CITIES: AN APPLIED EXAMPLE FROM LONDON SPATIAL ANALYSIS Working Paper Series Working Jake Desyllas Elspeth Duxbury John Ward CENTRE FOR ADVANCED CENTRE FOR Andrew Smith Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis University College London 1-19 Torrington Place Gower Street London WC1E 6BT [t] +44 (0) 20 7679 1782 [f] +44 (0) 20 7813 2843 [e] [email protected] [w] www.casa.ucl.ac.uk http//www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper62.pdf Date: June 2003 ISSN: 1467-1298 © Copyright CASA, UCL Pedestrian Demand Modelling of Large Cities: An Applied Example from London Dr. Jake DESYLLAS*, Elspeth DUXBURY*, John Ward, Andrew Smith** Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK *Intelligent Space Partnership, 68 Great Eastern Street, London EC2A 3JT **Transport for London Street Management, Windsor House, 50 Victoria Street London SW1H 0TL PEDESTRIAN DEMAND MODELLING OF LARGE CITIES: AN APPLIED EXAMPLE FROM LONDON Dr. Jake DESYLLAS Elspeth DUXBURY Partner Partner Intelligent Space Partnership Intelligent Space Partnership 68 Great Eastern Street 68 Great Eastern Street London EC2A 3JT London EC2A 3JT Tel: +44 20 7739 9729 Tel: +44 20 7739 9729 Fax: +44 20 7739 9547 Fax: +44 20 7739 9547 E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] Web: http://www.intelligentspace.com Web: http://www.intelligentspace.com John WARD Andrew SMITH Research Assistant (and Consultant ISP) Senior Service Development and Performance Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA) Officer University College London Transport for London Street Management 1-19 Torrington Place Windsor House London WC1E 6BT 50 Victoria Street Tel: +44 207 679 1782 London SW1H 0TL Fax: +44 207 813 2843 Phone: [+44] (0)20 7941 4382 Email: [email protected] Fax: [+44] (0)20 7941 4356 Web: www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/people/John.html E-mail:[email protected] Abstract This paper introduces a methodology for the development of city wide pedestrian demand models and shows its application to London.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH EAST a Perfect Match
    SOUTH EAST No. 91 September 2015 ‘Narrowestwalker path in London’ ungated t is not often that a path one point, Brydges Place runs claimed it was private property in the centre of London between St Martin’s Lane and and started using it as a garage. Ifeatures in South East Bedfordbury with an offshoot Westminster City Council’s Walker but an alleyway, close to into Chandos Place. Dominic policy is generally against Trafalgar Square, has been the tells the story: gating so how this application subject of a 13-year campaign In 2000, a resident living next was granted is unclear. When spearheaded by Dominic Pinto, to the path, somehow obtained I first became involved in early Vice-Chair of Inner London planning permission from 2009, I discovered some unusual Ramblers Reputedly the Westminster City Council to features. The file was not in narrowest footpath in London place doors across the Chandos the planning department but and only 15 inches wide at Place entrance to Brydges Place, continued on page 3 Brydges Place at its narrowest. A perfect match hen Helen Box and keep up with the theme of how Steven Van Boxel they met, Steven proposed to W joined Oxon 20s Helen during a walk on the & 30s Walkers in September Long Mynd in Shropshire. 2012, little did they know that They celebrated their wedding they were about to meet their on 7 April this year and their perfect match. cake was artistically decorated They met on a very wet walk with a walking theme including along the Ridgeway and soon boots, map, waymark signs and realised they had lots in common beautiful countryside scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • A Visitor's Guide to Travelling Around London River Cycling Walking Visit
    3438TfL_T.A.L_DL_Artwork_13_08.qxd 13/11/08 3:31 pm Page 1 Amersham Stanmore Luton Edgware High Barnet Welwyn Garden City CockfostersEnfield Stansted Chingford TTranransporsporttfforor LLondondonon Chesham Mill Hill East Hertford North Town Airport Wembley Hendon Central Tube and Rail Services Uxbridge Park Cheshunt Hendon East Finchley Wood Green River Watford Brent Cross Staying safe Aylesbury Alexandra Palace Northumberland Neasden Highgate Turnpike Lane Bruce Grove Wood Street in inner London Golders Green Hornsey Park River journeys are a fast and effective way to travel Security has been enhanced across the transport Dollis Hill Harringay Uxbridge Harrow & Wealdstone 3 Hampstead Archway Harringay Green Lanes Willesden Cricklewood Epping across London. Frequent and reliable services from network in London. Sudbury Hill Watford Junction Wembley Green A visitor’s guide to Hampstead Heath Hainault Harrow Stadium Tufnell Park Crouch Hill Kilburn Manor central London provide the best opportunity to Gospel Oak House Blackhorse You can help High Wycombe Sudbury Sudbury & Wembley Seven Tottenham Hill Harrow Road Central Finchley Road Sisters Hale Road travelling around London view the sights of the capital from an unobstructed & Frognal Kentish Town Upper Holloway Stonebridge West Walthamstow Ask the question ‘is that your bag?’ Park Belsize Park Central and inspiring angle. For more information on river Stamford Your bus, Tube and rail map • Harlesden Kentish Town South Walthamstow West Hampstead Finsbury Park Hill Tottenham Queen’s Road and report unattended bags to a member Sudbury Brondesbury Park Chalk Farm service routes please visit tfl.gov.uk/river Town Willesden Junction Arsenal Stoke Newington Leyton Leytonstone of staff or a police officer Kensal Rise Brondesbury Camden Holloway St.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Walking Potential 2016
    Analysis of Walking Potential 2016 Policy Analysis Report March 2017 Analysis of Walking Potential March 2017 Contents Executive summary 3 1. Introduction 12 2. Methodology 14 3. Potentially walkable trips 17 4. Where are potentially walkable trips being made? 27 5. Potentially walkable stages 36 6. The total potential for walking 46 7. Conclusions 54 2 Executive summary Key findings Londoners make 3.6 million daily journeys by motorised modes (car, motorcycle, taxi or public transport) that could be walked, at least in part Of these, nearly 2.4 million trips could be walked all the way These trips are mostly made by car or bus, with most taking place in outer London Forty per cent of these trips would take less than 10 minutes for most people to walk The remaining 1.2 million potentially walkable journeys are those that could only be walked part of the way (such as driving or taking the bus to/from a rail station). These are referred to as walk stages. Most potentially walkable stages in central London or in outer London town centres are currently made by public transport and are for work reasons Walking is already a popular mode of travel in London – the most recent Travel in London report shows that on an average day there are 6.3 million walk trips (where walking was the only mode used) and 6.8 million walk stages (where walking was part of a longer trip using other modes) of more than five minutes made in London. More, however, can be done to encourage more people to walk more often – given that, at present, only 34 per cent of adults in London are achieving two 10-minute periods of active travel per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Release This Statistical Release Presents Information on Walking and Cycling
    Walking and cycling statistics Local area walking and cycling statistics: England 2010/11 Statistical Release This Statistical Release presents information on walking and cycling amongst adults (aged 16 and over) in England, by local area. This 30 August 2012 is the first release in this series of statistics. The statistics in this release are based on results from the Active PeopPeoplele Survey (APS), an annual household telephone survey administered by Sport England. The APS is designed to measure Key Findings 1 participation in sport and active recreation but includes questions Overall walking and 2 about all cycling and walking activity. The APS covers more than cycling participation 160,000 persons, which is sufficient to enable detailed analysis at Walking and cycling 3 local authority level. for 30 minutes or This releasreleasee presents results from the fifth Active People Survey longer (APS5), which ran from October 2010 to October 2011. Some Walking and cycling 4 results from APS5 have been published previously by Sport for utility purposes England (see section 7), but this release presents additional Related information 6 measures and more detailed analysis specifically related to Users and uses of 7 walking and cycling. these statistics Related information 7 The key findings from Local area walking and cycling: England 2010/11 include Background notes 8 10 per cent of adults cycle at least once per week. This figure varies significantly by area, from over 50 per cent to less than 5 per cent. 11 per cent of adults cycle for at least half an hour, at least once per month.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Strategy 2017-2027
    Westminster Walking Strategy 2017-2027 December 2017 Contents Foreword Executive Summary 04 I am delighted to introduce Westminster’s Walking Strategy Objectives 06 2 Walking Strategy 2017 - 2027. Westminster 3 Introduction 12 has a strong tradition of providing for Westminster’s Context 12 pedestrians, as can be seen from this Walking in Westminster in numbers 12 completely revised Walking Strategy and Reasons for producing the Westminster the examples, case studies and Action Plan Walking Strategy 17 it contains. Strategic Context 18 Walking is the universal mode of transport because whilst some people travel in Westminster using other modes everyone National Policies 18 completes the last leg of their journey on foot. Whether it is London 18 walking from a tube or train station, bus stop, river bus pier or parking space to their destination. The Mayor’s Transport Strategy, 2017 18 Other strategic plans and guidance 20 More walking will help to create better neighbourhoods for residents, businesses and visitors, that enhances people’s WESTMINSTER WALKING STRATEGY 2017-2027 City of Westminster 21 health and fitness, and could help to reduce traffic congestion Westminster Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and so air and noise pollution. More walking is better for 2017 / 2018 22 businesses with happier and healthier staff, and a better retail, hospitality and leisure environment. With higher quality Walking in the City of Westminster 26 pedestrian environments helping people to enjoy all that Westminster has to offer. Objective 1: to provide the capacity to support current walking demand and to accommodate future growth 26 Westminster therefore aims to make walking the mode of choice to enable the city to grow and deliver the many benefits Objective 2: to improve the quality of the walking it brings.
    [Show full text]
  • Liveable Neighbourhoods GTC Bid Pro Forma Oct 2017 Final
    1 Liveable Neighbourhoods Bid Pro forma (To be used from July 2017) Answer all questions in the application form. If the question does not apply to your project enter ‘Not applicable’ or ‘N/a’. By submitting this application you are confirming the following: (a) The information supplied on this form is correct and complete at the time of the bid. (b) The borough accepts the requirements set out in the Guidance for the submission of Liveable Neighbourhoods applications (July 2017) projects or any subsequent editions/updates Broadly the bid document (excluding appendices) should be a maximum of 20 pages. The information provided in this pro forma should provide sufficient detail so as to give a complete overview of the project. It should contain enough qualitative and quantitative information to justify the need for investment, inform objective decision making by TfL and help boroughs and TfL to prioritise potential schemes. The blue text in this pro forma provides guidance on what information is sought in each section. This text can be deleted when completing the form 2 General Information Table 1 Organisation name(s): If the bid is a joint proposal, please enter the names of all participating organisations and specify the lead authority Project manager responsible for delivering the LN proposal and Mohammed Chibou their contact details Person completing the Mohammed Chibou 0208 921 8905 submission and their contact [email protected] details: Project Title: Greenwich Town Centre Livable Neighborhood Scheme What Financial Year is this Financial Year 2018/19 application to be considered for? Is the Borough submitting any other Liveable Neighbourhoods No applications? Has this project been submitted No.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for London Annual Report and Statement of Accounts 2008/09
    Transport for London Annual Report and Statement of Accounts 2008/09 MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London >Contents > The year at a glance 4 > Message from the Mayor 6 > Commissioner’s foreword 8 > Operational performance 10 > Expanding public transport capacity 12 > Smoothing traffic flow 20 > A revolution in cycling and walking in London 26 > Delivering our London 2012 transport projects 32 > Improving safety and security 36 > Improving the travel experience in London 44 > Delivering sustainability 56 > Improving efficiency, equality and partnerships 66 > The Mayor’s Transport Strategy 74 > Statement of Accounts 80 > Chief Officers 160 > Members of TfL 161 > Directors of Crossrail Ltd 163 > Membership of TfL panels and committees 164 > Remuneration 166 3 Transport for London > Annual Report and Statement of Accounts 2008/09 >The year at a glance >April 08 >May 08 > The refurbishment of the District > An extra 440 police officers line fleet completed 11 months announced to tackle bus crime early and under budget and antisocial behaviour > London Overground stations > Metronet Rail transferred to deep-cleaned and revitalised TfL control >June 08 >July 08 > Free travel announced for > Royal Assent received for the war veterans, war widows Crossrail Act with the project on and widowers track for delivery in 2017 > Alcohol banned on TfL’s > Additional charging points transport network announced for electric cars >August 08 >September 08 > Thirty British Transport Police > Designs for new air-conditioned Neighbourhood Policing trains unveiled for
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Transport Strategy 2014-2024
    Hackney Transport Strategy 2014-2024 Walking Plan Summer 2014 PJ55910 Hackney Transport Strategy 2014‐2024 Walking Plan Contents 1. Introduction Page 3 2. Daughter Documents Page 6 3. Why the need for a Walking Plan? Page 7 4. Policy Frameworks Page 10 5. Walking in Hackney – current trends and targets Page 11 6. Challenges and barriers to walking more in Hackney Page 17 7. Proposed Actions, Policies and Proposals Page 22 8. Action Plan for Walking Page 30 9. Delivery Plan – Funding and Priorities Page 48 10. Monitoring Page 55 11. Bibliography Page 56 Tables Table 1: Hacking Walking to Work comparison table Page 13 Table 2: Travel to school mode share in Hackney Page 15 Table 3: Barriers to walking Page 17 Table 4: Consultation Issues Raised Page 19 Table 5: Impacts of Workplace Travel Plans Page 46 Table 6: Public Realm Major Schemes Page 50 Table 7: Local Improvement Schemes Page 52 Table 8: Smarter Travel/ Encouragment Measures Page 54 Figures Figure 1: Census 2001 walking to work levels in Hackney Page 14 Figure 2: Hackney Central APP proposed public realm interventions Page 33 Figure 3: Hackney Wick AAP proposed public realm & open space improvements Page 36 Figure 4: Legible london ‐ Existing & proposed short term extension of LL signage Page 34 2 Hackney Transport Strategy 2014‐2024 Walking Plan 1. Introduction Walking remains the most basic and commonly used form of transportation. The vast majority of all journeys start with and end with a walk regardless of the modes used in between. This Walking Plan outlines Hackney Council’s commitment towards walking and sets out a set of policies and proposals for the period 2014 to 2024 to make walking a normal, safe and attractive choice for travel and recreation for our residents and those that work, visit and pass through the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to London Information to Start Your Visit Summer 2012/13
    TR127708_TfL_Welcome_To_London_CR4_Layout 1 14/06/2012 12:25 Page 1 WELCOME TO LONDON INFORMATION TO START YOUR VISIT SUMMER 2012/13 Includes Tube + Bus maps TR127708_TfL_Welcome_To_London_CR4_Layout 1 14/06/2012 12:25 Page 2 1Top 10 Attractions London has a huge variety of attractions. Historical or contemporary, paid 1 Top 10 Attractions for or free, there is something to suit all tastes and budgets. Here are the top ten visitor attractions (according to visitor numbers in 2010). 2 Visitor Information * Indicates free entry to permanent exhibitions 1. British Museum* 3 Getting Around A fascinating range of objects from around the world from prehistoric to modern times. 4 London’s Regions 2. Tate Modern* 5 Tube and Rail Map Britain’s national museum of modern art in an iconic former power station. 3. National Gallery* 6 Bus Routes One of the world’s greatest collections of European paintings from 1250 to 1900. 4. Natural History Museum* 7 Useful Tips As well as the infamous dinosaurs, the museum has a collection of the biggest, tallest and rarest animals in the world. As Mayor of London I am delighted to welcome you to London – the best big city on earth. 5. EDF Energy London Eye The world’s highest observation wheel with spectacular views. This booklet has been designed to help first time visitors get started in London with useful tips for 6. Science Museum* making the most of your trip and practical advice Over 40 galleries and 2,000 hands-on exhibits. on getting around town. 7. Victoria and Albert Museum* With unique heritage, fantastic culture and iconic Celebrating art and design with collections on ceramics, furniture, attractions, there is always something to see and do whether you are fashion, sculpture and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Older People Walking Report
    Older Londoners’ perceptions of London streets and the public realm Final Report April 2016 Contents 1 Background and approach 2 Headlines 3 What is important as you get older? 4 How does walking support older people’s needs? 5 What are the barriers to walking? 6 Opportunities for more walking trips Background and approach Background . TfL are developing a new strategic approach to walking and as part of this would like to improve their understanding of the pedestrian experience, particularly among older people. We know that walking is good for everyone, helping people to stay active and spend time out of doors, particularly important as people get older and their health becomes more important. As well as being free, easy and environmentally friendly, walking is a great social activity and can improve older people’s quality of life. With that in mind, TfL are keen to understand how older people feel about walking in London, their perceptions of London's streets and the urban realm and to identify opportunities for more walking trips. This research will help inform future projects and policies aimed at increasing the amount of walking done by older people and improving the experience of walking. 5 Objectives How do older people perceive London’s streets and what Business are the barriers to walking? question • To understand older people’s perceptions of the streets where they Research currently walk or potentially could walk Objectives • To identify what types of trips are being walked and understand motivations for walking • To identify
    [Show full text]