DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Walking Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Walking Analysis Strategic Walking Analysis TfL City Planning Strategic Analysis Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 3 PART A - Walking Insights 2. Current walking patterns .................................................................. 4 3. Walking potential ................................................................................ 14 PART B - Strategic Data 4. Framework to identify key areas for walking ........................... 21 5. Next steps ............................................................................................. 27 Glossary .......................................................................................................... 31 Appendix : Using the framework in the City Planner Tool ......... 33 2 Action 9 of the Walking Action Plan is to publish the first 1. Introduction Strategic Walking Analysis (SWA), comprising a suite of datasets for boroughs and stakeholders, and this summary report. The SWA draws on existing data and combines analyses of levels of Walking as part of regular travel has many benefits; it helps walking, walkable trips and barriers to walking, mapping out at people to stay healthy and is a great way to explore the city. In a granular level where the walking experience could be addition switching from motorised travel to walking reduces improved and where more people could walk. This report also road danger, air pollution and noise. Walking also encourages demonstrates how this data can be combined with other interaction and helps to makes Town Centres and High Streets information, for example where people are not currently thriving places. achieving 20 minutes of daily active travel, in order to define measures to meet the objectives of the MTS. Walking is integral to the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS) published in March 2018. One of the core MTS targets is for 80 The SWA will help to inform prioritisation and investment in per cent of all trips in London to be made on foot, by cycle or walking to obtain the best result for Londoners and local using public transport by 2041. The MTS also has an ‘Active communities. This will allow TfL, the London Boroughs and People Target’ for all Londoners to do at least the 20 minutes other partners to make best use of their resources to deliver of physical activity a day required to stay healthy by 2041. improvements to enable trips to be undertaken by safe, Walking as part of regular travel is the easiest way for efficient and sustainable modes including walking. This will Londoners to become, and remain, physically active, in line contribute towards the objectives in the MTS including the 80 with our Healthy Streets approach, as well as reduce reliance per cent mode share target. on the private car. This summary report is split into two sections. Part A contains Following on from the MTS, TfL published its Walking Action various insights on walking across London, whilst Part B sets Plan in July 2018, which sets out the scale of change needed to out a framework which can be used to help identify where deliver the MTS. The plan outlines two additional walking- walking improvements could be implemented. The data specific targets and a series of actions required to make underpinning this framework is based on current levels of London a more walkable city. walking and what the potential for more walking in an area might be. The report also details the additional data available Target 1: Target 2: within the City Planner Tool (CPT) which can be used to Increase the number of Increase the proportion supplement the SWA data. walking trips by more of trips to primary than one million per schools made by walking day by 2024 (from 6.4 to 57 per cent by 2024 million to 7.5 million). (from 53 per cent). 3 2. Current walking patterns 2.2. Walk Trips and Stages The walking done by Londoners can be broken down into walk trips and walk stages. 2.1. Overview To understand how and where to encourage more walking, it is Walk trips capture end to end trips which are walked all the important to understand the current situation. This chapter way. For example, a trip from home to work which is walked presents data on walk trips and stages, pedestrian density, the whole way without using another mode of transport. walking distances and socio-demographic variations. The data has come from the London Travel Demand Survey1 (LTDS). Walk stages are walks which are made as part of a longer trip, involving other modes. For example, a walk stage from home Whilst LTDS is currently our most comprehensive source of to a London Underground station, followed by another journey information on walking in London it has some methodological stage on the Underground, and then a further walk stage to the and statistical limitations that are common to traditional travel final destination. diary recall surveys. For example, it is not ideal for measuring incremental changes in the amount of walking in London. In Over the last 13 years, the number of walking trips and stages addition the data applies to London residents only and made by the average Londoner has been broadly stable. therefore omits the sometimes substantial amount of walking However there has been a small decrease in recent years. made by non-residents in central London. Data from Travel in London has shown that in recent years, For this reason, TfL has developed a new direct-count survey there is a broad trend of declining trip rates across all modes. of pedestrian activity. This initially focuses on central London The trips most affected are those made for shopping, personal but is expandable to Greater London. This data will be capable business and leisure purposes. This suggests that a decline in of giving a robust trend for all walking. Data from this survey discretionary trip purposes has been driving the overall decline 2. will be used to measure progress towards the 2024 Walking in recent years . This general trend is also reflected for walking Action Plan target. trips and stages where the data shows in recent years the amount of walking made by London residents has been declining. 1The London Travel Demand Survey is a continuous household survey of the London area and has been running since 2005/06 with an annual sample size of around 8,000 households. It captures information on households, people, trips and vehicles. 2 Travel in London 10, Chapter 4: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/travel-in-london-report-10.pdf 4 Figure 1 - Walk trip rates and walk stage rates (LTDS) Figure 2 - Change in walk trips and stages relative to 2005/06 baseline (LTDS) Walk-all-the-way trip rate and walk stage rate by year 3.0 Percentage change in walk trip rates and walk stage rates indexed to 2005/06 25% 2.5 20% 2.0 15% 10% 1.5 5% 1.0 0% -5% person per day, 7-day week) person per day, 7-day 0.5 -10% All modes trip rate (excluding walk) -15% - Walk all the way trip rate (excluding walk stages) Walk trip or walk stage rate (number of trips/stages per Percentage difference from 2005/06 baseline -20% Walk stage rate Walk all the way trip rate (exc walk stages) Walk stage rate -25% Figure 1 shows in 2017/18 Londoners made on average 0.6 walk- all-the-way trips per day and 2.1 walk stages per day. This is the Figure 2 shows how walk trip and walk stage rates have lowest it has been since the LTDS database began collecting changed since 2005/06. Walk trip rates have been mostly data in 2005/06. The SWA will help inform prioritisation and reducing since 2012/13 and walk stage rates since 2013/14. In investment in walking through providing data driven insights. It 2017/18, walk stage rates have remained stable but represent a is one of the key tools which can be used to help turn around reduction on the 2005/06 baseline data. this trend and increase the amount of walking in London. 5 2.3. Walking distances Figure 3 – Daily walk distance per person in trips and stages (LTDS) Walking is an important source of physical activity. It is possible to look at the distances Londoners walk on average to Distance walked per person per day, network distance get a sense of how much walking may be contributing to estimate (km) Londoners’ health and how this is changing over time. 1.6 In 2017/18 the average daily walk distance per person was 1.2km. 1.4 This was made up of 0.7km in walk-all-the-way trips and 0.5km in walk stages to or from other modes. 1.2 Walk all the way trips are on average longer than walk stages. 1.0 However, London residents make more walk stages than trips each day, and therefore walk stages account for a slightly 0.8 higher proportion of the total distance walked per person per day. 0.6 Walk distance (km) Walk distance Figure 3 shows that in 2017/18 the average daily distance walked 0.4 per person from both walk-all-the-way trips and walk stages is at its lowest for 10 years. 0.2 Average walk distances for both walk-all-the-way-trips and 0.0 walk stages have stayed broadly stable over the last 10 years. 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 The decline in average daily distance walked per person is a Walk all the way km per person per day Walk stage km per person per day result of the reduction in the number of walk trips and walk stages made by the average Londoner as described in the previous section. 6 Table 1 summarises the key statistics about the number and distance of walk-all-the-way trips and walk stages for 2017/18.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploring the Walking Near Market Presentation
    Exploring the walking near market 10077 April 2011 Confidentiality Please note that the copyright in the attached report is owned by TfL and the provision of information under Freedom of Information Act does not give the recipient a right to re-use the information in a way that would infringe copyright (for example, by publishing and issuing copies to the public). Brief extracts of the material may be reproduced under the fair dealing provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes, private study, criticism, review and news reporting. Details of the arrangements for reusing the material owned by TfL for any other purpose can be obtained by contacting us at [email protected]. Research conducted by 2CV 2 Contents Background Executive summary The walking near market in focus The decision making process for short trips Understanding the experience of behaviour change Opportunities for increasing walking 3 Background The Mayor’s Transport Strategy sets out the ambition to ‘deliver a step change in the experience of walking in London by making walking count’ (proposal 59). The Mayor’s target is to increase walking by 1%, or 57,000 trips a day by 2031 Previous qualitative research has armed TfL with insights on walking for both utility and leisure journeys; including the various motivations and barriers that exist simultaneously in people’s minds. These include Personal, Social and Environmental factors The findings of several studies in sustainable travel suggest that the same behaviour change model applies to walking as it does for most other transport/travel behaviour change.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Plan Proposal for London Has Been Developed and in This Booklet You Will Find Information on the Changes Proposed for London
    Post Office Ltd Network Change Programme Area Plan Proposal London 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Proposed Local Area Plan 3. The Role of Postwatch 4. List of Post Office® branches proposed for closure 5. List of Post Office® branches proposed to remain in the Network • Frequently Asked Questions Leaflet • Map of the Local Area Plan • Branch Access Reports - information on proposed closing branches and details of alternative branches in the Area 3 4 1. Introduction The Government has recognised that fewer people are using Post Office® branches, partly because traditional services, including benefit payments and other services are now available in other ways, such as online or directly through banks. It has concluded that the overall size and shape of the network of Post Office® branches (“the Network”) needs to change. In May 2007, following a national public consultation, the Government announced a range of proposed measures to modernise and reshape the Network and put it on a more stable footing for the future. A copy of the Government’s response to the national public consultation (“the Response Document”) can be obtained at www.dti.gov.uk/consultations/page36024.html. Post Office Ltd has now put in place a Network Change Programme (“the Programme”) to implement the measures proposed by the Government. The Programme will involve the compulsory compensated closure of up to 2,500 Post Office® branches (out of a current Network of 14,300 branches), with the introduction of about 500 service points known as “Outreaches” to mitigate the impact of the proposed closures. Compensation will be paid to those subpostmasters whose branches are compulsorily closed under the Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Advanced Spa Tial Analysis
    Paper 62 PEDESTRIAN DEMAND MODELLING OF LARGE CITIES: AN APPLIED EXAMPLE FROM LONDON SPATIAL ANALYSIS Working Paper Series Working Jake Desyllas Elspeth Duxbury John Ward CENTRE FOR ADVANCED CENTRE FOR Andrew Smith Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis University College London 1-19 Torrington Place Gower Street London WC1E 6BT [t] +44 (0) 20 7679 1782 [f] +44 (0) 20 7813 2843 [e] [email protected] [w] www.casa.ucl.ac.uk http//www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper62.pdf Date: June 2003 ISSN: 1467-1298 © Copyright CASA, UCL Pedestrian Demand Modelling of Large Cities: An Applied Example from London Dr. Jake DESYLLAS*, Elspeth DUXBURY*, John Ward, Andrew Smith** Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK *Intelligent Space Partnership, 68 Great Eastern Street, London EC2A 3JT **Transport for London Street Management, Windsor House, 50 Victoria Street London SW1H 0TL PEDESTRIAN DEMAND MODELLING OF LARGE CITIES: AN APPLIED EXAMPLE FROM LONDON Dr. Jake DESYLLAS Elspeth DUXBURY Partner Partner Intelligent Space Partnership Intelligent Space Partnership 68 Great Eastern Street 68 Great Eastern Street London EC2A 3JT London EC2A 3JT Tel: +44 20 7739 9729 Tel: +44 20 7739 9729 Fax: +44 20 7739 9547 Fax: +44 20 7739 9547 E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] Web: http://www.intelligentspace.com Web: http://www.intelligentspace.com John WARD Andrew SMITH Research Assistant (and Consultant ISP) Senior Service Development and Performance Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA) Officer University College London Transport for London Street Management 1-19 Torrington Place Windsor House London WC1E 6BT 50 Victoria Street Tel: +44 207 679 1782 London SW1H 0TL Fax: +44 207 813 2843 Phone: [+44] (0)20 7941 4382 Email: [email protected] Fax: [+44] (0)20 7941 4356 Web: www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/people/John.html E-mail:[email protected] Abstract This paper introduces a methodology for the development of city wide pedestrian demand models and shows its application to London.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH EAST a Perfect Match
    SOUTH EAST No. 91 September 2015 ‘Narrowestwalker path in London’ ungated t is not often that a path one point, Brydges Place runs claimed it was private property in the centre of London between St Martin’s Lane and and started using it as a garage. Ifeatures in South East Bedfordbury with an offshoot Westminster City Council’s Walker but an alleyway, close to into Chandos Place. Dominic policy is generally against Trafalgar Square, has been the tells the story: gating so how this application subject of a 13-year campaign In 2000, a resident living next was granted is unclear. When spearheaded by Dominic Pinto, to the path, somehow obtained I first became involved in early Vice-Chair of Inner London planning permission from 2009, I discovered some unusual Ramblers Reputedly the Westminster City Council to features. The file was not in narrowest footpath in London place doors across the Chandos the planning department but and only 15 inches wide at Place entrance to Brydges Place, continued on page 3 Brydges Place at its narrowest. A perfect match hen Helen Box and keep up with the theme of how Steven Van Boxel they met, Steven proposed to W joined Oxon 20s Helen during a walk on the & 30s Walkers in September Long Mynd in Shropshire. 2012, little did they know that They celebrated their wedding they were about to meet their on 7 April this year and their perfect match. cake was artistically decorated They met on a very wet walk with a walking theme including along the Ridgeway and soon boots, map, waymark signs and realised they had lots in common beautiful countryside scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return
    London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee Combined Evidence Received:.pdf version Investigation: Overcrowding in London’s Social Rented Housing Contents Organisation Evidence Reference Page Number Number London Borough of Bromley OSRH001 2 Family Mosaic OSRH002 44 East Thames Group OSRH003 46 Affinity Sutton OSRH004 50 Homes and Communities Agency (London) OSRH005 54 South-East London Region OSRH006 60 Hexagon Housing Association OSRH007 62 London Borough of Redbridge OSRH008 66 Kier Partnership Homes OSRH009 87 Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) OSRH010 95 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames OSRH011 99 Citizens Advice OSRH012 103 Notting Hill Housing OSRH013 107 National Housing Federation OSRH014 110 London Borough of Waltham Forest OSRH015 114 Peabody Trust OSRH016 147 London Borough of Croydon OSRH017 153 London Borough of Camden OSRH018 156 G15 Group OSRH019 165 North London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH020 167 City of London OSRH021 172 Genesis Group OSRH022 174 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham OSRH023 179 St George Regeneration OSRH024 188 The Hyde Group OSRH025 190 London Borough of Hounslow OSRH026 194 London Borough of Harrow OSRH027 201 East London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH028 208 London School of Economics (LSE) OSRH029 215 Developers Group OSRH030 218 Amicus Horizon OSRH031 222 CIH (Chartered Institute of Housing) London OSRH032 225 London Borough of Southwark OSRH033 232 West London Region OSRH034 283 London Councils OSRH035 286 London Borough of Merton OSRH036 291 London Borough of Brent OSRH037
    [Show full text]
  • A Visitor's Guide to Travelling Around London River Cycling Walking Visit
    3438TfL_T.A.L_DL_Artwork_13_08.qxd 13/11/08 3:31 pm Page 1 Amersham Stanmore Luton Edgware High Barnet Welwyn Garden City CockfostersEnfield Stansted Chingford TTranransporsporttfforor LLondondonon Chesham Mill Hill East Hertford North Town Airport Wembley Hendon Central Tube and Rail Services Uxbridge Park Cheshunt Hendon East Finchley Wood Green River Watford Brent Cross Staying safe Aylesbury Alexandra Palace Northumberland Neasden Highgate Turnpike Lane Bruce Grove Wood Street in inner London Golders Green Hornsey Park River journeys are a fast and effective way to travel Security has been enhanced across the transport Dollis Hill Harringay Uxbridge Harrow & Wealdstone 3 Hampstead Archway Harringay Green Lanes Willesden Cricklewood Epping across London. Frequent and reliable services from network in London. Sudbury Hill Watford Junction Wembley Green A visitor’s guide to Hampstead Heath Hainault Harrow Stadium Tufnell Park Crouch Hill Kilburn Manor central London provide the best opportunity to Gospel Oak House Blackhorse You can help High Wycombe Sudbury Sudbury & Wembley Seven Tottenham Hill Harrow Road Central Finchley Road Sisters Hale Road travelling around London view the sights of the capital from an unobstructed & Frognal Kentish Town Upper Holloway Stonebridge West Walthamstow Ask the question ‘is that your bag?’ Park Belsize Park Central and inspiring angle. For more information on river Stamford Your bus, Tube and rail map • Harlesden Kentish Town South Walthamstow West Hampstead Finsbury Park Hill Tottenham Queen’s Road and report unattended bags to a member Sudbury Brondesbury Park Chalk Farm service routes please visit tfl.gov.uk/river Town Willesden Junction Arsenal Stoke Newington Leyton Leytonstone of staff or a police officer Kensal Rise Brondesbury Camden Holloway St.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B the North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny
    APPENDIX B The North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee Terms of Reference 1. Membership Membership of the Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC) is one nominated voting member from each participating council, plus one other nominated member to whom the vote can be transferred (on the basis of that member being an elected member of the council they are representing). Alternatively, a Borough can nominate one voting member only. A substitute member can be nominated by the Borough. The vote can also be transferred to the substitute member where he or she is an elected member of the council and the voting member is unavailable. The JHOSC consists of the following authorities: London Borough of Brent London Borough of Ealing London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough of Harrow London Borough of Hounslow Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea London Borough of Richmond City of Westminster 2. Quorum The committee will require at least six members in attendance to be quorate. 3. Chair and Vice Chair The JHOSC will elect its own chair and vice chair. Elections will take place on an annual basis each May, or as soon as practical thereafter, such as to allow for any annual changes to the committee’s membership. The Chair and Vice Chair shall not be members of the same authority or the same political party. 4. Duration It is important the JHOSC operates on the basis of being able to contribute to the effective scrutiny of cross-borough health issues. The JHOSC should provide a forum for cross borough engagement and consultation between its member local authorities, and health service commissioners and providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrow Industrial Stories the Local Economy on the Central Industrial Estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories
    markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities Harrow Industrial Stories The local economy on the central industrial estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories Study and report by markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities www.markoandplacemakers.com Copyright © Marko and Placemakers and Francis Moss August 2013 Commissioned by Harrow Council Supported by the Mayor’s Outer London Fund Marko and Placemakers Team Francis Moss, Igor Marko, Alejandro Sajgalik, Giulia Toscani, Denizer Ibrahim, Minh Toan Research The data and business profiles in this report are based on observation and information given by individual employees or owners of businesses during visits to Harrow’s central industrial estates in 2013. They are not official statements or data about the businesses. Photographs © Francis Moss Photographs were taken with the permission of the subjects to be included in this report and a potential exhibition. Kodak Archive Photographs © The British Library Board Bird’s-eye photographs © Microsoft Corporation Maps based on Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100019206 Thanks to London Borough of Harrow Mark Billington, Andy Stubbs, David Sklair Greater London Authority Matt Murphy, Tina Jadav, Adam Towle, Mark Brearley Report best viewed as double page spread and printed double sided 2 Harrow Industrial Stories Contents Introduction 4 Context 5 Methodology 7 Categories 8 Overview 10 Estate breakdown 12 Location 14 Suppliers and Customers 15 Employees 16 Size 18 Age 20 Health 21 Estates A1-A4 22 Estates A1-A4 Profiles 24 Estate B1 26 Estate B1 Profiles 28 Estate B2 30 Estate B2 Profile 32 Estates C1-C6 34 Estates C1-C6 Profiles 36 Estates D1-D3 40 Estates D1-D3 Profiles 42 Estates E1-F1 44 Estates E1-F1 Profiles 46 Estates F2-F5 52 Estates F2-F5 Profiles 54 Estate G1 56 Estate G1 Profiles 58 Conclusion 60 Recommendations 62 Business Support 63 3 Harrow Industrial Stories Introduction London’s high streets have been the focus of a lot of recent attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information To
    BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. About EACH 1.1 Organisational Profile EACH is a voluntary sector organisation with over 26 years’ experience of providing specialist counselling and support services to individuals and family members affected by alcohol and drug misuse, domestic violence and mental health concerns. We operate across West London with centres in Brent, Ealing and Hounslow as well as providing services through outreach based satellites in Hillingdon, Harrow, Kingston- upon-Thames, Richmond, Wandsworth and Merton as part of the London Councils Violence against Women and Girls consortium. EACH’s IPS project has extended our reach into Barnet, Hammersmith and Fulham. EACH provides a range of community based services, with a long history of developing specialist services to meet the needs of Black and Minority Ethnic communities who experience cultural and linguistic barriers to mainstream services. EACH is a company limited by guarantee with charitable status. Established in 1991, the organisation is recognised both locally and nationally for the innovative work it has pioneered in delivering alcohol and mental health services, primarily, in Asian communities in West London. 1.2 EACH’s Reach EACH currently has presence in the boroughs below, along with London boroughs of Richmond upon Thames, Kingston upon Thames, Wandsworth and Merton. The new IPS project will further extend EACH’s reach into Barnet and Hammersmith and Fulham. London Borough of Brent Brent is located in North-west London and is a borough that is culturally diverse with a significant ethnic population of approximately 57%. Information on the borough can be found on the www.brent.gov.uk website.
    [Show full text]
  • This Chart Shows the Ethnicity Profile of Ethnic Minority Groups in NWLH
    Profile of Children and Young people accessing Paediatric Speech and Language Therapy services -September 2014 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Harrow’s Overall Population The 2011 National Census indicates that Harrow’s population is one of the most diverse nationally, with 69.1% of residents coming from minority ethnic groups, with the largest group being of Indian ethnicity. The borough also has the largest concentration of Sri Lankan Tamils in the UK as well as having the highest density of Gujarati Hindus in the UK. Harrow is also ranked 8th nationally for linguistic diversity in the Greater London Authority’s Linguistic Diversity Index. At least 88 different languages are “spoken” in Harrow, including three categories of sign language. According to the GLA School Role Projection Service, the increased migration into the borough is projected to continue rising over the next few years. 1.2 Philosophy of our Service The speech and language therapy service at North West London Hospitals NHS Trust provides therapy services to children and young people with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) 0-18 years in a variety of settings working in partnership with colleagues in health, education, social care others and the voluntary sector to promote a comprehensive service to all children and families taking account of cultural and ethnic background. 2.0 Scope of Audit This audit aims to provide data about the population of children and young people in the London Borough of Harrow who were accessing speech and language therapy service in August 2014. It interrogates some of the most salient data sets for CYP with SLCN e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Harrow
    London Borough of Harrow Produced by Personnel Services, Chief Executive’s Department, London Borough of Harrow, Civic Centre, Station Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 2XF. Tel: 020 8863 5611. London Borough of Harrow Race Equality Scheme 2002 - 2005 Foreword The London Borough of Harrow is committed to achieving equality of opportunity both as a large employer of people and as a provider of services. We welcome the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 for giving us a comprehensive legislative framework within which to review our services and functions. The Council and indeed our partners have already undertaken considerable work to promote race equality and we have achieved Beacon Status in this area. We are committed to building on the work we have already undertaken and learning from it in order to ensure continuous improvement in the area of promoting race equality. Our aim in producing this Race Equality Scheme is to demon- strate our wholehearted commitment to fulfil our statutory obligations in relation to the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 in carrying out all our functions and duties to promote race equality. We recognise that in our society, groups and individuals continue to be unlawfully discriminated against and we acknowledge our responsibilities to eliminate unlawful discrimination and to promote equality of opportunity and good relations within the rich diversity of Harrow's communities. Archie Foulds Joyce Markham Leader of Council Chief Executive 1 Acknowledgments Harrow Council would like to thank all those who have We welcome your views contributed to the development of this Race Equality Scheme. We would like to thank all staff who have been involved in This Race Equality Scheme is a developing and evolving working on the scheme, and all representatives of community document, which will be reviewed annually.
    [Show full text]