DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE Wednesday 4 October 2006 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2006. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Wednesday 4 October 2006 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE ............................................................................................................................................. 4065 PLANNING ETC (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 2 ..................................................................................................... 4066 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION ........................................................................................................................... 4098 Race Relations Act 1976 (Statutory Duties) (Scotland) Amendment Order 2006 (SSI 2006/467) ....................................................................................................................................... 4098 COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE 26th Meeting 2006, Session 2 CONVENER *Karen Whitefield (Airdrie and Shotts) (Lab) DEPUTY CONVENER *Euan Robson (Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (LD) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Scott Barrie (Dunfermline West) (Lab) *Cathie Craigie (Cumbernauld and Kilsyth) (Lab) *Christine Grahame (South of Scotland) (SNP) *Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) *John Home Robertson (East Lothian) (Lab) Tricia Marwick (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP) *Dave Petrie (Highlands and Islands (Con) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTES Chris Ballance (South of Scotland) (Green) Alex Johnstone (North East Scotland) (Con) Christine May (Central Fife) (Lab) Mike Rumbles (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (LD) Ms Sandra White (Glasgow) (SNP) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO ATTENDED: Johann Lamont (Deputy Minister for Communities) Christine May (Central Fife) (Lab) David McLetchie (Edinburgh Pentlands) (Con) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Steve Farrell SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Katy Orr ASSISTANT CLERK Catherine Fergusson LOCATION Committee Room 4 4065 4 OCTOBER 2006 4066 Scottish Parliament Planning etc (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2 Communities Committee Wednesday 4 October 2006 09:32 The Convener: The committee will consider [THE CONVENER opened the meeting at 09:31] amendments to the Planning etc (Scotland) Bill at stage 2 on this, our sixth day of consideration. Item in Private Members should have in front of them copies of the bill, the marshalled list and the groupings. The Convener (Karen Whitefield): I open the I welcome to the committee Johann Lamont, the 26th meeting of the Communities Committee in Deputy Minister for Communities. She is 2006. I remind all members and visitors to the accompanied by a number of Scottish Executive committee that mobile phones and BlackBerry officials: Tim Barraclough, Nikola Plunkett, devices should be switched off. I have received Norman MacLeod, Gregor Clark, Colin Gilchrist apologies from Tricia Marwick, who I understand is and Sally Thomas. Depending on the part of the ill. I welcome David McLetchie, who has an bill that we are considering, the officials may need interest in the Planning etc (Scotland) Bill. to change seats at certain points. Agenda item 4 is on the committee’s approach Before we commence our consideration of the to the budget process for 2007-08. Members are bill, it might be helpful to point out a few things. asked to consider whether to discuss item 4 in First, in order to speed things along, if a member private. Does anyone wish to comment on that does not wish to move an amendment, he or she proposal? should simply say, “Not moved.” Any other member may move the amendment at that point, Members: No. but I will not specifically invite other members to The Convener: Item 4 will be taken in private. do so. If no other member moves the amendment, I will simply go on to the next amendment on the marshalled list. Secondly, if a member wishes to withdraw an amendment, I will put the question, “Does any member object to the amendment being withdrawn?” If any member objects, I will immediately put the question on the amendment. Finally, if I am required to use my casting vote, I intend to vote for the status quo, which—on this occasion—is the bill as it stands. Section 36—BID proposals The Convener: Amendment 222, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 226 to 231 and 235 to 240. The Deputy Minister for Communities (Johann Lamont): I intend to speak to amendments 226, 222 and 229, which are the main amendments in the group. Amendments 227, 228, 230, 231 and 235 to 240 are largely consequential. Following the initial consultation process in 2003 and the recommendations of the first business improvement districts working group, we received clear representations from business representatives, individual businesses and local authorities that BIDs should involve property owners and businesses with long-term commitments to areas. Property owners or people with longer leases are likely to be substantial 4067 4 OCTOBER 2006 4068 beneficiaries of any successful BID project as a Where both ratepayers and other owners or result of improved rental values and reductions in tenants are involved in the BID, it is appropriate vacancy rates, for example. that the rateable value of the property accounted in the vote be distributed between the two Amendment 226 will allow BID proposers the interests. It is intended that the allocation of option of engaging eligible tenants or owners in rateable value between them will be clearly the local BID ballot, in addition to ratepayers who outlined in the BID proposal and will be an are included in the bill. It will allow the local BID estimate of the likely beneficial impact of the BID proposer to restrict the ballot to ratepayers for the project. Amendment 229 will allow flexibility in so relevant properties only, but will require the BID far as the regulations under the bill can provide for proposer to state in the proposal who will that allocation of the rateable value vote in the BID participate in the ballot—ratepayers only or proposal. Alternatively, ministers can make the ratepayers and eligible tenants and owners. We allocation in the regulations. Of course, scope will recognise that identifying owners or people with remain for the BID proposer to restrict the BID longer leases is not always straightforward, but we project to ratepayers only. think that we have found a workable solution to allow their involvement in BIDs, which the As I said, amendments 227, 228, 230, 231 and business community requested. Where the BID 235 to 240 are consequential amendments that proposal provides for it, the tenants of the relevant result from the situation that I have just explained. properties in the BID area who have leases that I move amendment 222. have at least five years to run, or the true owners of properties where there are no such tenants, will The Convener: No member wishes to speak to be eligible to vote in the ballot with ratepayers. the amendments. Do you wish to add anything? Section 36(1) of the bill states that BID Johann Lamont: No. I have nothing to add—I arrangements are not to come into force unless have said it all. the proposals are approved by a ballot of the ratepayers who are entitled to vote. Amendment Amendment 222 agreed to. 222 is required as a result of amendment 226 The Convener: Amendment 248, in the name of because proposals may be approved by other David McLetchie, is grouped with amendments eligible tenants and owners as well as by 249 and 250. ratepayers. There will still be a ballot only of ratepayers where the proposal provides for that. David McLetchie (Edinburgh Pentlands) (Con): I thank you for welcoming me to the Amendment 229 is the last of the main meeting, convener. I am at this morning’s meeting amendments in the group. Throughout the policy to speak to amendments in my name that we were formulation process, stakeholders have made it unable to deal with last week, as time ran out. clear to us that property owners and tenants that have sufficient interest in properties should be Amendments 248 and 250 are the substantive involved in BIDs where appropriate. Consultation amendments in the group. Amendment 249 is on that has taken place, so the amendments consequential on agreement to amendment 248. provide for that involvement. The need to involve Amendments 248 and 250 address a key issue that group in a proposed BID area means that the relating to business improvement district group must also be able to participate in the voting proposals—the issue of additionality. The purpose procedures. Amendment 229 therefore provides of amendment 248 is to make it explicit in the bill for a required change to the voting mechanism that those who are required to pay a BID levy will where a BID proposal involves ratepayers and receive additional services over and above the other eligible tenants or owners. services that are already provided by the local authority and which are financed out of general Details of the voting procedures will be included taxation, including business rates. Amendment in regulations, but the bill sets out two main voting 248 seeks to do that by requiring the mechanisms. First, those who are eligible to vote establishment of a baseline to make explicit that will participate in a simple head-count vote to additionality. Amendment 248 should be ensure that a majority is in favour of the BID welcomed by the Scottish Executive, and I offer it project. That process will not change if tenants or in the spirit of helpfulness; we are constantly told owners of properties are also involved—a majority that the purpose of a business improvement of persons will still need to vote in favour of the district is to provide enhanced services, and not project. The second mechanism involves a vote simply to extract money from businesses for according to the different rateable values of the services that they have a right to expect from the properties in the BID area. Again, a majority of the taxes that they already pay.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 2003
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2003 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Introduction: James Mitchell 1. The Executive: Barry Winetrobe 2. The Parliament: Mark Shephard 3. The Media: Philip Schlesinger 4. Public Attitudes: John Curtice 5. UK intergovernmental relations: Alex Wright 6. Relations with Europe: Alex Wright 7. Relations with Local Government: Neil McGarvey 8. Finance: David Bell 9. Devolution disputes & litigation: Barry Winetrobe 10. Political Parties: James Mitchell 11. Public Policies: Barry Winetrobe ISBN: 1 903903 09 2 Introduction James Mitchell The policy agenda for the last quarter in Scotland was distinct from that south of the border while there was some overlap. Matters such as identity cards and foundation hospitals are figuring prominently north of the border though long-running issues concerned with health and law and order were important. In health, differences exist at policy level but also in terms of rhetoric – with the Health Minister refusing to refer to patients as ‘customers’. This suggests divergence without major disputes in devolutionary politics. An issue which has caused problems across Britain and was of significance this quarter was the provision of accommodation for asylum seekers as well as the education of the children of asylum seekers. Though asylum is a retained matter, the issue has devolutionary dimension as education is a devolved matter. The other significant event was the challenge to John Swinney’s leadership of the Scottish National Party. A relatively unknown party activist challenged Swinney resulting in a drawn-out campaign over the Summer which culminated in a massive victory for Swinney at the SNP’s annual conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounts Commission Papers 12 March 2015
    The Accounts Commission for Scotland Agenda Meeting on Thursday 12 March 2015 in the offices of Audit Scotland, 18 George Street, Edinburgh The meeting will begin at 10.15am 1. Apologies for absence. 2. Declarations of interest. 3. Decisions on taking business in private: The Commission will consider whether to take items 11 to 14 in private. 4. Minutes of meeting of 12 February 2015. 5. Minutes of meeting of Financial Audit and Assurance Committee of 26 February 2015. 6. Minutes of meeting of Performance Audit Committee of 26 February 2015. 7. Update report by the Secretary to the Accounts Commission: The Commission will consider a report by the Secretary to the Commission on significant recent activity in relation to local government. 8. Update report by the Controller of Audit: The Commission will consider a verbal report by the Controller of Audit providing an update on his recent activity. 9. Opencast coal mining restoration: The Commission will consider a report by the Director of Performance Audit and Best Value. 10. Review of annual audits: The Commission will consider a report by the Controller of Audit and Director of Performance Audit and Best Value. The following items are proposed to be considered in private: 11. Audit Scotland matters: Best companies survey: The Commission will consider a verbal report from the Chief Operating Officer, Audit Scotland. 12. Public Audit in Scotland: The Commission will consider a report by the Secretary to the Commission. 13. Audit Scotland Corporate Plan: The Commission will consider a report by the Chief Operating Officer, Audit Scotland. 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report
    EUROPEAN AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE Tuesday 2 December 2003 (Afternoon) Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2003. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Tuesday 2 December 2003 Col. FISHERIES (P RE-COUNCIL BRIEFING) ........................................................................................................ 222 SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE (SCRUTINY) ........................................................................................................... 246 CONVENER’S REPORT ............................................................................................................................ 251 INTERGOV ERNMENTAL CONFERENCE ........................................................................................................ 257 SIFT .................................................................................................................................................... 258 EUROPEAN AND
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Report
    European Committee 3rd Report, 2002 Report on the Inquiry into the Future of Cohesion Policy and Structural Funds post 2006 SP Paper 618 £13.30 Session 1 (2002) Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2002. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. European Committee 3rd Report, 2002 Report on the Inquiry into the Future of Cohesion Policy and Structural Funds post 2006 European Committee Remit and membership Remit: 1. The remit of the European Committee is to consider and report on- (a) proposals for European Communities legislation; (b) the implementation of European Communities legislation; and (c) any European Communities or European Union issue. 2. The Committee may refer matters to the Parliamentary Bureau or other committees where it considers it appropriate to do so. 3. The convener of the Committee shall not be the convener of any other committee whose remit is, in the opinion of the Parliamentary Bureau, relevant to that of the Committee. 4. The Parliamentary Bureau shall normally propose a person to be a member of the Committee only if he or she is a member of another committee whose remit is, in the opinion of the Parliamentary Bureau, relevant to that of the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Elections: 1 May 2003 14.05.03
    RESEARCH PAPER 03/46 Scottish Parliament 14 MAY 2003 Elections: 1 May 2003 This paper provides summary and detailed results of the second elections to the Scottish Parliament which took place on 1 May 2003. The paper provides data on voting trends and electoral turnout for constituencies, electoral regions and for Scotland as a whole. This paper is a companion volume to Library Research Papers 03/45 Welsh Assembly Elections and 03/44 Local Elections 2003. Matthew Leeke & Richard Cracknell SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers 03/32 Parliamentary Questions, Debate Contributions and Participation in 31.03.03 Commons Divisions 03/33 Economic Indicators [includes article: Changes to National Insurance 01.04.03 Contributions, April 2003] 03/34 The Anti-Social Behaviour Bill [Bill 83 of 2002-03] 04.04.03 03/35 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2003-04-11 10.04.03 03/36 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2003 17.04.03 03/37 Economic Indicators [includes article: The current WTO trade round] 01.05.03 03/38 NHS Foundation Trusts in the Health and Social Care 01.05.03 (Community Health and Standards) Bill [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/39 Social Care Aspects of the Health and Social Care (Community Health 02.05.03 and Standards Bill) [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/40 Social Indicators 06.05.03 03/41 The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) 06.05.03 Bill: Health aspects other than NHS Foundation Trusts [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/42 The Fire Services Bill [Bill 81 of 2002-03] 07.05.03 03/43
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet
    MINISTERS, LAW OFFICERS AND Scottish MINISTERIAL PARLIAMENTARY AIDES BY Parliament CABINET: SESSION 1 Fact sheet This Fact sheet provides a list of all of the Scottish Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides during Session 1, from 12 May 1999 until the appointment of new Ministers in the second MSPs: Historical parliamentary session. Series Ministers and Law Officers continue to serve in post during 30 March 2007 dissolution. The first Session 2 cabinet was appointed on 21st May 2003. A Minister is a member of the government. The Scottish Executive is the government in Scotland for devolved matters and is responsible for formulating and implementing policy in these areas. The Scottish Executive is formed from the party or parties holding a majority of seats in the Parliament. During Session 1 the Scottish Executive consisted of a coalition of Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs. The senior Ministers in the Scottish government are known as ‘members of the Scottish Executive’ or ‘the Scottish Ministers’ and together they form the Scottish ‘Cabinet’. They are assisted by junior Scottish Ministers. With the exception of the Scottish Law Officers, all Ministers must be MSPs. This fact sheet also provides a list of the Law Officers. The Scottish Law Officers listed advise the Scottish Executive on legal matters and represent its interests in court. The final section lists Ministerial Parliamentary Aides (MPAs). MPAs are MSPs appointed by the First Minister on the recommendation of Ministers whom they assist in discharging their duties. MPAs are unpaid and are not part of the Executive. Their role and the arrangements for their appointment are set out in paragraphs 4.6-4.13 of the Scottish Ministerial Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Convention for Giving Firm Shape to That Will
    We Commend ..... This report is about practical intent. It says: "Here is what we are going to do," not "here is what we would like". Those who seek inspirational home rule rhetoric are respectfully directed elsewhere, including to the Convention's own previous publications. We have moved on. We regard the argument in principle as compelling. The longing of the people of Scotland for their own Parliament rings clear and true every time opinion is sounded. We believe that the momentum for change is now too great to deny; and that a Scottish Parliament will soon be meeting for the first time in nearly three centuries. What has been missing has been a practical scheme for bringing the Parliament into existence, and a hard-headed assessment of what it will be able to achieve. That is the gap which this report fills. This report shows that the Parliament can work, and it shows how. In doing so, it answers opponents who have tried to portray a Scottish Parliament as a pipe- dream, a fantasy which the Scots, unlike other peoples around the world, somehow cannot turn into reality. The Convention has a diverse membership, as diverse as we could make it. Diversity and unanimity are not natural companions. It is the instinct of political parties to disagree with one another, and the instinct of civic groups like the churches, the trade unions and others to be impatient with the preoccupations of politicians. This has meant that a lot of time and effort has been required to arrive at the proposals in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • St/S2/06/12/A Standards and Public Appointments
    ST/S2/06/12/A STANDARDS AND PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE AGENDA 12th Meeting, 2006 (Session 2) Tuesday 19 December 2006 The Committee will meet at 11.00 am in Committee Room 4. 1. Cross-Party Group on Carers: The Committee will consider an application to establish a Cross-Party Group in the Scottish Parliament on Carers. 2. Replacing the Members’ Interests Order: The Committee will consider responses to its 3rd Report 2006, Consultation on Determinations required under the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006, and consider draft reports to Parliament on the determinations. Jennifer Smart Clerk to the Committee Room TG.01 Ext: 85239 email: [email protected] ************************* ST/S2/06/12/A The following papers are attached for this meeting: Agenda item 1 – Proposed Cross-Party Group ST/S2/06/12/1 Note by the clerks ST/S2/06/12/1a Registration form for CPG on Carers ST/S2/06/12/1b Alphabetical list of cross-party groups Agenda item 2 – Replacing the Members’ Interests Order Note by the clerks (response to consultation) ST/S2/06/12/2 Note by the clerks (publication of reports) ST/S2/06/12/2a Draft report on determinations – form and content of written ST/S2/06/12/2b statement Draft report on determinations – publication of Register of Interests ST/S2/06/12/2c Draft report on determinations – declaration of interests ST/S2/06/12/2d Draft report on determinations – gross income from heritable ST/S2/06/12/2e property Standards and Public Appointments Committee, 3rd Report 2006 (Session 2), Consultation on Determinations required under the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Committee
    EC/S2/07/6/A ENTERPRISE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE AGENDA 6th Meeting, 2007 (Session 2) Tuesday 13 March 2007 The Committee will meet at 1.45 pm in Committee Room 2. 1. Sport 21 – the national strategy for sport in Scotland – and sports policy: The Committee will take evidence, in a round-table discussion, from— Julia Bracewell, Chair, sportscotland; Steven Grimmond, Head of Community Planning, Fife Council; Gavin Macleod, Chief Executive Officer, Scottish Disability Sport; Ian Reid, Scottish Sports Futures; David Arnott, Administrator, Scottish Association of Local Sports Councils; Paul Bush, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, EventScotland; Louise Martin, Chairman, Commonwealth Games Council for Scotland; Gavin Hastings, Chairman, Platinum One (Scotland); Dougie Donnelly, Chairman, Scottish Institute of Sport; Professor Fred Coalter, Department of Sports Studies, University of Stirling; Chris Robison, Policy Director, Scottish Sports Association, and Pat Morrison, Team Leader, Sports Division, Scottish Executive. 2. The impact of EU structural funds programmes in Scotland from 1994- 2006: The Committee will consider research produced by the European Policies Research Centre on behalf of the Committee and receive a presentation from— Dr Sara Davies, Senior Research Fellow, and Professor John Bachtler, Director, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde. 3. Scottish Register of Tartans Bill: The Committee will consider correspondence from Jamie McGrigor MSP. 4. Legacy paper: The Committee will consider a draft paper. 5. Committee
    [Show full text]
  • A History: 1993–2018
    r e d l E m a d A @ : t i d e r C Scottish Grocers Federation 222/224 Queensferry Road A History: Edinburgh EH4 2BN 199 3– 2018 T: 0131 343 3300 E: [email protected] W: scottishshop.org.uk By Lawrie Dewar MBE Edited by Karen Peattie Foreword by Pete Cheema 1981 Tom Hood President 1962-1963 1981 Jack Suttie President 1966-1967 1981 David Woodside President 1969-1970 1981 Archie Alexander Federation Secretary 1982 Roy McFarlane President 1963-1964 1982 Malcolm MacLeod President 1967-1968 1982 John Aitken President 1968-1969 1982 Bruce Aitkenhead President 1973-1974 1982 Roger Rogerson President 1974-1975 1982 Stan Clarke President 1978-1979 Our industry is worth Honorary 1983 May Christie SGF NEX £5.2 billion per annum Members of the 1983 Ian Adam President 1956-1957 “ 1983 James McGuire President 1972-1973 1983 James Renwick President 1977-1978 to the Scottish economy Scottish Grocers’ 1984 John Irving President 1976-1977 1984 Willie McPhail and directly employs Federation 1984 BenSavage 1984 Geoff Walker over 41,000 people 1986 Madge Alexander 1987 Sam Kilburn ” 1987 Archie McNicol McCurrach’s 1989 Michæl Kempton Federation Accountant 1993 Lionel Cashin Mars UK 1996 Andrew Nicol President 1987-1988 1996 Walter McCubbin SGF NEX 1997 John Paterson SGF NEX 1998 Sarah Jeffrey MD, PGMA 1999 Calum Duncan SGF NEX 1999 Lambert Munro SGF NEX 2001 Lawrie Dewar President 1975-1976/Fed Sec 2001 Ross Kerr Walkers Crisps 2006 Eddie Thompson President 1998-2000 2006 Scott Landsburgh President 1994-1996/Fed Sec 2008 Dougie Edgar President 2000-2002 2012 Jim Botterill President 2002-2004 2012 David Sands President 1996-1998 2017 Tom Wilson President, 1980/81 and 1986/87 2017 Ian McDonald JW Filshill 2017 Alan McCaffer PepsiCo 2017 Bep Dhaliwal Mars Chocolate 2017 Sandy Wilkie Retired Milkman Foreword It is remarkable to think that the Scottish Technology, meanwhile, has been our Grocers’ Federation has reached such a friend and allows retailers to work in pivotal moment in its history.
    [Show full text]