DOCSLIB.ORG

CONSERVATION ADVISORY GROUP Tuesday

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONSERVATION ADVISORY GROUP Tuesday CONSERVATION ADVISORY GROUP Tuesday 8th January 2013 at 7 PM Contact: Heloise Brown Venue: Room 1 Conservation Officer Civic Centre, Silver Street Direct dial: 020 8379 4019 Enfield, EN1 3XA Extension: 4019 Email: [email protected] Council website: www.enfield.gov.uk MEMBERS Councillors: Cole, Ibrahim , Lavender, Pearce and Robinson Co-opted: Mr D. Stacey - Bush Hill Park Conservation Area Study Group Mr T Dey - Federation of Enfield Residents and Allied Associations Mr P. Fisk - Forty Hill and Bulls Cross Study Group Ms H Walton - Edmonton Study Group Dr C. Jephcott – The Enfield Society Mrs C. Carter - Enfield Town Conservation Area Study Group Mrs A Bishop-Laggatt - Federation of Enfield Residents and Allied Associations Mrs I Stone - Southgate District Civic Trust Mr D Alexander - Trent Park Conservation Committee Mr A Newman – Clay Hill Study Group Dr D Gandhi – Southgate Green Study Group Mr P Hutchinson – Grange Park Conservation Area Study Group Mr T Hanrahan – Meadway Conservation Area Study Group Mr G Dalling – Edmonton Hundred Historical Society Mr C Younger – Lakes Estate Conservation Study Group Director of Environment AGENDA – PART 1 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE (if any) 2. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS Members to identify any personal or prejudicial interests relevant to any items on the agenda. Please see attached guidance. ATTACHMENT A 3. MINUTES To confirm the Minutes of the meeting that took place on 28th November 2012. ATTACHMENT B 4. LOCAL PLAN AND HERITAGE AND DESIGN PROJECTS UPDATE Christine White will update members on the CAA / CAMP Review programme. 5. PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND LISTED BUILDING APPLICATIONS FOR DISCUSSION ATTACHMENT C 6. CHAIRMAN’S FEEDBACK FROM PLANNING COMMITTEE To receive for information feedback from the CAG Chairman from Planning Committee of 18th December 2012. 7. CONSERVATION OFFICER’S FEEDBACK ABOUT LAST MONTH’S CASES 8. CONSERVATION AREAS, LISTED BUILDING APPLICATIONS AND APPEALS–DETERMINED ATTACHMENT D 9. OPEN SESSION To enable members of the Conservation Advisory Group to bring up urgent matters not covered elsewhere on the agenda 10. CALENDAR OF MEETINGS To receive for information, the calendar of meetings for the Municipal Year 2012 ATTACHMENT E 11. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC AND PRESS TO CONSIDER PASSING A RESOLUTION UNDER SECTION 100A(4) OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 EXCLUDING THE PRESS AND PUBLIC FROM THE MEETING FOR THE ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOVED TO PART 2 OF THE AGENDA ON THE GROUNDS THAT THEY INVOLVE THE LIKELY DISCLOSURE OF EXEMPT INFORMATION AS WILL BE DEFINED IN THOSE PARAGRAPHS OF PART 1 OF THE SCHEDULE 12A TO THE ACT, AT THE MEETING. (There are currently no items in Part 2 of the Agenda unless any items are transferred from Part 1). DECLARING INTERESTS FLOWCHART - QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF A What matters are being discussed at the meeting? You can participate Do any relate to my interests whether NO in the meeting and already registered or not? vote YES Is a particular matter close to me? Does it affect: me or my partner; NO my relatives or their partners; my friends or close associates; either me, my family or close associates: job and business; employers, firms you or they are a partner of and companies you or they are a Director of NO or them to any position; corporate bodies in which you or they have a shareholding of more than Personal interest Personal interest £25,000 (nominal value); my entries in the register of interests more than it would affect the majority of people in the ward affected by the decision, or in the authority’s area or constituency? Declare your personal interest in the matter. You can YES remain in meeting, speak and vote unless the interest is also prejudicial; or You may have a If your interest arises solely from your membership of, personal interest or position of control or management on any other public body or body to which you were nominated by the authority e.g. Governing Body, ALMO, you only need declare your personal interest if and when you speak on the matter, again providing it is not prejudicial. Does the matter affect your financial interests or You may have a YES relate to a licensing, planning or other regulatory prejudicial interest matter; and Would a member of the public (knowing the relevant facts) reasonably think that your personal interest was so significant that it would prejudice your YES judgement of public interest? Prejudicial interest interest Prejudicial Do the public have speaking rights at the meeting? YES NO You should declare the interest but can remain You should declare the interest and in the meeting to speak. Once you have withdraw from the meeting by leaving finished speaking (or the meeting decides you the room. You cannot speak or vote have finished - if earlier) you must withdraw from on the matter and must not seek to the meeting by leaving the room. improperly influence the decision. Note: If in any doubt about a potential interest, members are asked to seek advice from Democratic Services in advance of the meeting. B Minutes of the Conservation Advisory Group Meeting 28th November 2012 MEMBERS Councillors: Cole, Ibrahim, Lavender, Pearce and Robinson Co-opted: Mr D. Stacey - Bush Hill Park Conservation Area Study Group Mr T. Dey - Federation of Enfield Residents and Allied Associations Mr P. Fisk - Forty Hill and Bulls Cross Study Group Ms H. Walton - Edmonton Study Group Dr J. McQueen– The Enfield Society Mrs C. Carter - Enfield Town Conservation Area Study Group Mrs A. Bishop-Laggatt - Federation of Enfield Residents and Allied Associations Mrs I. Stone - Southgate District Civic Trust Mr D. Alexander - Trent Park Conservation Committee Mr A. Newman – Clay Hill Study Group Dr D. Gandhi – Southgate Green Study Group Mr C. Johnson – Grange Park Conservation Area Study Group Mr T. Hanrahan – Meadway Conservation Area Study Group Mr G. Dalling – Edmonton Hundred Historical Society Mr C. Younger – Lakes Estate Conservation Study Group Officers: Heloise Brown (Conservation Officer), Aled Richards (Head of Development Management), Paul Walker (Assistant Director Policy and Regeneration), Christine White (Heritage Officer) Italics denote absence AGENDA – PART 1 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Councillors Cole, Ibrahim and Lavender, Paul Hutchinson, Helen Walton, Donald Alexander, Anne Bishop-Laggatt, Tom Hanrahan, 2. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS Paul Walker, for his leading role in the Council’s Middlesex University application (P12-02677PLA and P12-02678HER). 3. MINUTES Chris Jepcott commented that CAG’s remit does embrace large applications outwith of conservation areas (ref: P12-02266PLA). Dr Denise Ghandi noted that her point about the official DFE recommendation for the amount of indoor space was going to be less than the recommended minimum by 10% at the Walker had not been minuted. This site already falls short of the recommendations by 15% and the question of whether this should be allowed (and if it applied to Worcester) was raised. 5. LOCAL PLAN AND HERITAGE AND DESIGN PROJECTS UPDATE The Heritage Team were asked for a brief update on programmed activities every three months, starting from March 2013. 5. LETTER TO GRAHAM DALLING, EDMONTON HUNDRED HISTORICAL SOCIETY The Chairman gave an update that Graham Dalling had been pleased to receive CAG’s letter. 6. EDMONTON GREEN STATION LIFTS Kevin Edgington from D5 Architects and Edward Woodhouse from Mott MacDonald presented to CAG and explained that Network Rail and Enfield Council have agreed to jointly fund the new lift shafts at Edmonton Green Railway Station (there are only steps to the platforms currently). After reviewing the options for the cladding treatment to the shafts it was agreed that: There should be no banding to reflect adjacent properties. The shafts should match. The plinth course in stock bricks, dark above fading into dark green glazed brick at upper level (random insertion of dark bricks among the green glazed bricks). The brickwork should generally be without indented features, though some sort of string course at the top is acceptable. The ‘billboards’ at ground floor on platform 2’s lift shaft should be blind windows in the shape of lancet arches, to echo the previous building on the site. 8. PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND LISTED BUILDING APPLICATIONS FOR DISCUSSION P12-02566PLA and P12-02660HER FORTY HALL PARK AND ESTATE, FORTY HILL, ENFIELD, EN2 9EU This scheme has previously been presented to CAG at the pre-app stage. Andrew Newman had a number of concerns relating to the practical aspects of the proposals. These do not appear to have been fully addressed in the application: Foundation details. Weight of the gates. The structural support of the piers. Whether the matching bricks can be sourced. A method statement relating to dismantling the gateway and brickworks. Matching the mortar mix. Members support the principle of the proposal. P12-02677PLA and P12-02678HER Former Middlesex University Campus, No's 188-230 (even) (excluding No.228), Ponders End High Street and Ponders End Library The proposal is a Council-driven scheme. It addresses window retention (where possible) and the historic internal layout of the Broadbent Building. Members support the proposal. P12-02113PLA, Bramford Court, High Street, London, N14 6DH Despite the set back of the additional floor, members considered the extension would be very visible. Further the elevational treatment is entirely different from the existing building. Members object to the scheme as it introduces an alien feature on the building and is detrimental to the setting of the nearby listed buildings. P12-02665PLA 16 Conway Road, London, N14 7BA Members noted that street facing rooflights are not a feature in the immediate area and cited as a problem and pressure in the conservation area appraisal. Further the rear dormer windows are too large and poorly detailed. Members object to the scheme. P12-02521PLA, 8-10, Silver Street, Enfield, EN1 3ED Members noted the historical importance of the building.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Navigation of the River Lee (1190 – 1790)
    Edmonton Hundred Historical Society Occasional Paper New Series No. 36 by J.G.L.Burnby and M.Parker. Published 1978 Added to the site by kind permission of Mr Michael Parker THE NAVIGATION OF THE RIVER LEE (1190 – 1790) PREFACE As the men of the river frequently pointed out the Lee is one of the "great rivers of the realm", and it is only fitting that its history should be traced; indeed it is surprising that the task has not been carried out far earlier than this. Regretfully the story of its busiest period in the days of post-canalisation has had to be left to another, later Occasional Paper. The spelling of the name of the river has varied over the centuries. In 1190 it was referred to as "the water of Lin", in the fourteenth century as "La Leye", the cartographer Saxton seems to have been the first to introduce "Lea" to map-makers in 1576, in the eighteenth century it was not infrequently called the "Ware River" but the commonest spelling would seem to be "Lee" and it is to this which we have decided to adhere. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank the London Borough of Haringey Libraries panel for their financial assistance in the publication of this paper. Our gratitude also goes to the Marquess of Salisbury for granting permission to reproduce the maps held in the Hatfield House Collection. A number of people have most generously helped us in the production of this paper. Mrs.H.Baker has with her usual expertise drawn the map of the lower reaches of the river, and Mr.Neil Clements is responsible for the charming reproductions of the prints of the Powder Mill at Waltham Abbey and the river at Ware.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Royal Small Arms Factory (Enfield Lock) and Its Influence Upon Mass Production Technology and Product Design C1820-C1880
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Lewis, James H. (1996) The development of the Royal Small Arms Factory (Enfield Lock) and its influence upon mass production technology and product design c1820-c1880. PhD thesis, Middlesex University. [Thesis] This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6706/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Society News
    _______________________ SOCIETY NEWS THE BULLETIN OF THE ENFIELD ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY _________________ March 1998 No.148 CONTENTS FORTHCOMING EVENTS Friday 20th March - !ct"r!. Th! Roya O#!ra Ho"$! % th! Midd ! Saxo' To(' o) *"'d!'(ic. Gordo' Ma co +. Friday 1,th -#ri -''"a G!'!ra M!!ti'. )o o(!d /y R!#ort$ o) Fi! d(or0 % R!$!arch d"ri'. 199,. Friday 11th May - !ct"r!. Th! -'ato+y Th!atr! o) th! 2ar/!r- S"r.!o'$ o) *o'do'. 3!''i$ Hi 4Soci!ty Chair+a'5 Forthco+i'. !6!'t$ o) th! Ed+o'to' H"'dr!d Historica Soci!ty. Forthco+i'. !6!'t$ o) th! *o'do' % Midd !$!& -rcha!o o.ica Soci!ty. MEETING RE7ORTS *a'cast!r Road a'd its E'6iro'$. R!visi'. 7!6$'!r8 O d a'd N!( *a'd+ar0$ i' Midd !$!x. 29R: *O3GE % S-*IS29R: HO9SE /y Ia' Jo'!$ THE -NN9-* RE7ORT OF THE SOCIET:<S -CTIVITIES 39RING 199, Soci!ty N!($ is #"/ i$h!d ="art!r y i' March> ;"'!> S!#t!+/!r a'd 3!c!+/!r a'd is )r!! to +!+/!rs. Th! Ho'.Editor> to (ho+ a corr!$#o'd!'c! a'd articl!$ )or #"/ icatio' sho" d /! $!'t i$8 Joh' C St!6!'$> ? Scar/oro".h Road> *o'do' N9 8-T. T@N 0181.804.A918. Th! stat!+!'t$ a'd o#i'io'$ o) co'tri/"tor$ to thi$ '!($ !tt!r do 'ot '!c!$sari y r!B!ct th! o#i'io'$ o) th! !ditor.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2016 100 Minories - a Multi Period Excavation Next to London Wall, Guy Hunt L - P: Archaeology
    CONTENTS Page Notices 2 Reviews and Articles 6 Books and Publications 16 Lectures 17 Affiliated Society Meetings 18 NOTICES Newsletter: Copy Date The copy deadline for the next Newsletter is 18 March 2016 (for the May 2016 issue). Please send items for inclusion by email preferably (as MS Word attachments) to: [email protected], or by surface mail to me, Richard Gilpin, Honorary Editor, LAMAS Newsletter, 84 Lock Chase, Blackheath, London SE3 9HA. It would be greatly appreciated if contributors could please ensure that any item sent by mail carries postage that is appropriate for the weight and size of the item. So much material has been submitted for this issue that some book reviews have had to be held over until the May 2016 issue. Marketing and Publicity Officer LAMAS is seeking a bright, efficient and enthusiastic person to become its Marketing and Publicity Officer. The Society has 650 members world-wide, including many archaeologists, historians and conservationists, and plays a leading role in the protection and preservation of London’s heritage. Through its publications, lectures and conferences LAMAS makes information on London’s past accessible to a wide audience. This interesting and varied job will involve the promotion and marketing of all of the Society's activities and especially publications, at events and online. The officer will be responsible to Council and make periodic reports to it. Experience of online marketing would be useful but is not necessary. Enthusiasm for London's archaeology and history is essential. The job is unpaid and honorary, as are those of all of the Society's officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Southgate Town Hall Planning Brief Consultation Report October 2011
    Appendix A Southgate Town Hall Planning Brief Consultation Report October 2011 Contents Executive Summary 1. The Planning Brief consultation 2. People consulted and how we consulted them 3. Who responded to the consultation 4. What local residents said 5. What organisations and community groups said 6. Updating the planning brief Appendices A – Table of all comments received B – List of community groups, businesses and statutory groups contacted C – Notes from youth, community and council meetings D – Letters and consultation material Executive Summary The purpose of the planning brief is to provide the planning framework and detailed design guidance for the Southgate Town Hall site. The planning brief must be taken into account when considering options for the future development of the site. The planning brief contains information on what the site is like now, the surrounding environment and features, and the requirements for any redevelopment in terms of mix of uses, design, transport and landscaping. The purpose of the brief was to set out an approach to securing the refurbishment of the library and the redevelopment of the site and to consult residents and stakeholders. The consultation took place for 8 weeks from July 25 to September 16 2011. This report sets out: • Who we consulted on the brief • When we consulted them • How we consulted them • The profile of people who responded in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, religion, and location in the area. • The responses we received to the consultation and proposed changes to the brief as a result The key findings from the consultation are: - 113 responses were received on the consultation from individuals, community groups and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Southgate District Civic Trust
    Southgate District Newsletter No. 247 Civic Trust Jan. 2019 www.southgatedistrictcivictrust.org.uk Twitter: @southgatetrust Facebook: www.facebook.com/southgatedistrictcivictrust Contact us: [email protected] COMING EVENTS SPRING OPEN MEETING Saturday 23rd March 2019 at 2.00pm Christ Church, Waterfall Road, Southgate, N14 7EG A Talk on the Work of William Morris in Southgate The whole afternoon will be devoted to William Morris, the English Arts and Crafts designer and early socialist. Our speakers are: Fr Chrichton Limbert, Vicar, Christ Church Southgate and Ainsley Vinall, Assistant Curator, William Morris Gallery. Note that this meeting has been re-located to Christ Church and will start earlier at 2pm. (See page 10 for more details) ALL are welcome Other Dates for your Diary: Wed. 16th January 12.30pm Royal Small Arms Factory - unveiling plaque (see page 15) Sat. 26th Jan. - Mon. 22nd April John Ruskin Exhibition (see page 10) Wed. 30th January 11.00am Palmers Green Library - unveiling war memorials (see page 12) Mon. 25th February 6pm - 7pm Lecture on Robert Paul at Museum of London (see page 14) Contributions to the April newsletter should be sent by Friday 15th March to the Editor: Colin Barratt, 48 Maplin Close, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1NB Tel: 020 3302 4997 e-mail: [email protected] Copies will be emailed, hand delivered or posted during week commencing 8th April 2019. Southgate District Civic Trust ~ Established to conserve and enhance the environment in Southgate, New Southgate, Cockfosters, Palmers Green, Winchmore Hill and Hadley Wood. (Registered as an amenity society with Civic Voice). 1 CIVIC VOICE CONVENTION AND AGM Birmingham 19 -20 October 2018 In October, the Civic Voice Convention and AGM were held in Birmingham.
    [Show full text]
  • The First 50 Years – Part 2
    No: 184 March 2007 Society News The Bulletin of the Enfield Archaeological Society 2 Forthcoming Events: EAS 20 April: EAS Excavations in Enfield 2006 (& AGM) 18 May: Time Team Special – Shoreditch 12 May: WEA coach trip: Battle Abbey & Batemans 24 June: Members Event: Elsyng Palace 15 July: National Archaeology Day: Forty Hall 3 Other Societies 4 Society Matters 2007 Subscriptions Reminder Drivers wanted 4 Meeting Reports 15 December 2006 Romania 19 January 2007: Pre-1914 Edmonton 16 February: Batavia’s Graveyard 7 Excavations South and East of Forty Hall, July 2006 (FYE06) The 2006 Archaeology Day dig at Forty Hall 12 EAS Annual Report 2006 & AGM Agenda attracted all sorts of visitors, some better dressed than others (see report page 7) 15 Book Review – Edmonton (David Pam) Society News is published quarterly in March, June, 16 Pastfinders News September and December The Editor is Jeremy Grove, 119 Tenniswood Road, 16 Small Finds Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3HF, tel: 020 8363 9681, email: [email protected] http://www.enfarchsoc.org MEETINGS of the Enfield Archaeological Society are held at Jubilee Hall, 2 Parsonage Lane, Enfield (near Chase Side) at 8pm. Tea and coffee are served and the sales and information table is open from 7.30pm. Visitors, who are asked to pay a small entrance fee of £1.00, are very welcome. If you would like to attend the EAS lectures, but find travelling difficult, please contact the Secretary, David Wills (Tel: 020 8364 5698) and we will do our best to put you in touch with another member who can give you a lift.
    [Show full text]
  • Protestation Returns Document
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY THE 1641 - 42 PROTESTATION OF MIDDLESEX Oliver Cromwell outside the Houses of Parliament. The oath In 1641 Parliament decreed that ALL males over the age of 18 should swear an “Oath of Allegiance” to the Protestant Church of England, Parliament and the King Charles. Although many parts of England have no record of these returns, the returns for Middlesex include 16,600 names, which it is estimated are 80% of the total returns due for the county. The following is the oath which each male had to swear:- I,......................, do, in the Presence of Almighty God, promise, vow, and protest to maintain and defend, as far as lawfully I may, I with my Life, Power, and Estate, the true Reformed Protestant Religion, expressed in the Doctrine of the Church of England, against all Popery and Popish Innovations, within this Realm, contrary to the same Doctrine, and according to the Duty of my Allegiance, to His Majesty's Royal Person, Honour, and Estate, as also the Power and Privileges of Parliaments, the lawful Rights and Liberties of the Subjects, and every Person that maketh this Protestation, in whatsoever he shall do in the lawful Pursuance of the same; and to my power, and as far as lawfully I may, I will oppose and by all good Ways and Means endeavour to bring to condign Punishment all such as shall, either by Force, Practice, Counsels, Plots, Conspiracies, or otherwise, do any Thing to the contrary of any Thing in this present Protestation contained; and further, that I shall, in all just and honourable Ways, endeavour to preserve the Union and Peace betwixt the Three Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland: and neither for Hope, Fear, nor other Respect, shall relinquish this Promise, Vow, and Protestation." © House of Lords Records Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Carter, Paul (1998) Enclosure resistance in Middlesex, 1656 - 1889: a study of common right assertion. PhD thesis, Middlesex University. [Thesis] This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6313/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING COMMITTEE Date : 20 February 2018
    LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD PLANNING COMMITTEE Date : 20 February 2018 Report of Contact Officer: Ward: Assistant Director, Andy Higham Bush Hill Park Regeneration & Planning Sharon Davidson Mrs Jennie Rebairo Tel No: 020 8379 3822 Ref: 17/03256/RE4 Category: LBE - Dev by LA LOCATION: Church Street Tennis Courts, Great Cambridge Road, London, N9 9HL PROPOSAL: Extension of existing cemetery involving removal of 14 tennis courts. Applicant Name & Address: Agent Name & Address: Mr Jonathan Stephenson Mr Callum Whyte Enfield Council 3.25 East London Works Civic Centre 75 Whitechapel Road Silver Street London London E1 1DU UK EN1 3XY UK RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to conditions Notes to members: The proposal is council-own development. Ref: 17/03256/RE4 LOCATION: Church Street Tennis Courts, Great Cambridge Road, London Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey Scale 1:1250 North on behalf of HMSO. ©Crown Copyright and database right 2013. All Rights Reserved. Ordnance Survey License number 100019820 1. Site and Surroundings 1.1. The subject site comprises an area of land currently occupied by 14 tennis courts adjacent to the A10 Great Cambridge Road. 1.2. The site is bounded by Edmonton Cemetery to west and A10 Great Cambridge Road to the east. Residential dwellings are sited to the south of the site and adjoining Skateboard Park to the north. 1.3. The site is Metropolitan Open Lane and is currently in use as 14 tennis courts with an adjoining skateboard park. 1.4. The site is not in a Conservation Area and is not a Listed Building. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for England
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT HAVERING TOWN HALL, MAIN HALL, ROMFORD RM1 3BD ON MONDAY 31 OCTOBER 2016 DAY ONE Before: Mr Howard Simmons, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0207 960 6089 ______________________________ At 10.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the hearing today. This is to listen to the initial proposals from the Boundary Commission for the new constituencies in the London area and for members of the public and others to make representations about their views on that. My name is Howard Simmons. I am the Assistant Commissioner responsible for chairing the hearing today. I am supported by both my fellow commissioners, Emma Davy and Richard Wald, and by a team of Boundary Commission staff, led by Tim Bowden, who is on my right. Essentially, Tim will in a moment or two explain about the initial proposals and how people can make representations. The hearing is over two days. Today's is from 10 am ‘til 8 pm this evening. Tomorrow is from 9.00 until 5.00. We appear to have quite a busy schedule, quite a large number of people booked in. I should stress that the hearings today are for people to be able to make their representation not for cross-examination and not for challenge. If there are any questions for clarification, if you could please address those through me as the Chair of the session.
    [Show full text]
  • Spurs' Planning Applications
    TES News No 168 • Winter 2007 The newsletter of The Enfield Society Spurs’ planning What’s there now? applications Just after the publication of our last Newsletter in mid August, we were told that Spurs had submitted another planning application to the Council for the construction of a football training centre on Green Belt land at Bulls Cross. It was then a month later before we discovered Local football and bowls clubs, a venue ... such as this one, on 21st October that Spurs had withdrawn their for matches ... 2007, appeal against the Council’s refusal to grant permission for last year’s planning application; the public inquiry on this appeal had been due to start on 20th November. The new application, the third one to date, includes the land currently occupied by the Whitewebbs Sports Centre. The intention is to demolish the pavilion, other buildings and car park on that site, which is to be tennis courts, . a bowling green, a cricket ground . commended, and most of that land will become Academy football pitches. There are a number of other changes but the size of the company, and the present Council Academy/Training Facility building should not have offered them a 75 remains unaltered with a total year lease on this public land, no floorspace of 127,018 sq. ft matter how desperate the need for (11,800m2) on a footprint which is Spurs to improve their own training 425% greater than the sum of the and Academy facilities. footprints of all the buildings which A special Planning Panel meeting would be demolished.
    [Show full text]