2NT720 THE TEXT AND CANON OF SCRIPTURE II Instructor, C. E. Hill

RTS Orlando Time: Tuesdays 3:00-5:00 Spring 2019 Office Hours: Tues.; Thu. mornings Course Objectives Related to MDiv* Student Learning Outcomes

MDiv* Student Learning Outcomes Rubric Mini-Justification In order to measure the success of the MDiv curriculum, RTS  Strong has defined the following as the intended outcomes of the  Moderate student learning process. Each course contributes to these  Minimal overall outcomes. This rubric shows the contribution of this  None course to the MDiv outcomes. *As the MDiv is the core degree at RTS, the MDiv rubric will be used in this syllabus. Articulation Broadly understands and articulates Moderate Students will communicate results of (oral & knowledge, both oral and written, of research and will discuss their findings orally; essential biblical, theological, historical, they will prepare a paper on an aspect of the written) and cultural/global information, including textual criticism or the canon of the New details, concepts, and frameworks. Testament. Scripture Significant knowledge of the original Strong Some of the content of Scripture is studied in meaning of Scripture. Also, the concepts detail in terms of its text and the manuscripts for and skill to research further into the which represent it. The whole subject of original meaning of Scripture and to apply canon is concerned with Scripture. Scripture to a variety of modern circumstances. (Includes appropriate use of original languages and hermeneutics; and integrates theological, historical, and cultural/global perspectives.) Reformed Significant knowledge of Reformed Moderate Assumes and is based on the doctrine of Theology theology and practice, with emphasis on Scripture as expressed in the WCF and other the Westminster Standards. Reformed confessional documents.

Sanctifi- Demonstrates a love for the Triune God Minimal Although one could be a complete louse and cation that aids the student’s sanctification. be an expert on technical matters of canon and textual criticism, a proper approach and appropriation of this material will be of great advantage to the ongoing process of the believer’s sanctification. Desire for Burning desire to conform all of life to the Moderate Understanding the origins of the text and the Worldview Word of God. formation of the Biblical canon is foundational to an informed Christian world and life view. Winsomely Embraces a winsomely Reformed ethos. Moderate What could be more winsomely Reformed Reformed (Includes an appropriate ecumenical spirit than the study of textual criticism – and the with other Christians, especially manuscripts themselves? Evangelicals; a concern to present the Gospel in a God-honoring manner to non- Christians; and a truth-in-love attitude in disagreements.) Preach Ability to preach and teach the meaning of Minimal No preaching techniques are offered here, Scripture to both heart and mind with only part of the essential knowledge on which clarity and enthusiasm. sound preaching is based.

2

Worship Knowledgeable of historic and modern Minimal No study of worship forms or construction of Christian-worship forms; and ability to a worship service – only some foundational construct and skill to lead a worship knowledge for the preacher of God’s Word. service. Shepherd Ability to shepherd the local congregation: Minimal The shepherd should be better equipped to aiding in spiritual maturity; promoting use guard and feed the sheep through successful of gifts and callings; and encouraging a completion of this course. concern for non-Christians, both in America and worldwide. Church/ Ability to interact within a denominational Minimal This course should help to keep World context, within the broader worldwide denominational and wider ecumenical church, and with significant public issues. activity on the right foundation.

Course Description An introduction to paleography, codicology, and the study of the manuscript tradition of the Bible, focusing on manuscripts and their transmission. The course will consist of readings, discussions, and student research on textual division under the direction of the instructor.

Required Texts. Holmes, Michael, ed., The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations (hardback) third edn. (Baker, 2007) Hurtado, Larry, The Earliest Christian Artifacts. Manuscripts and Christian Origins (Grand Rapids/Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2006) Turner, Eric C. The Typology of the Early Codex (Wipf & Stock reprint, 2011)

Bibliography and Other Suggested Reading Blue signifies a required reading Aland, K. and B. Aland, The Text of the New Testament. An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism (Eerdmans, 1995 Bagnall, Roger, Early Christian Books in Egypt (Princeton: Princeton University, 2009) Barker, Don, “The Dating of New Testament Manuscripts,” NTS 57 (2011), 571-82 Cavallo, G. “Greek and Latin Writing in the Papyri,” The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Edited by R. S. Bagnall; Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2009) pp. 101-48. Charlesworth, Scott D., “Indicators of Catholicity in Early Gospel Manuscripts” in The Early Text of the New Testament. Edited by Charles E. Hill and Michael J. Kruger (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 37-48. Comfort, Philip W., New Testament Text and Translation Commentary (Carole Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 2008) ______, Encountering the Manuscripts: An Introduction to New Testament Paleography & Textual Criticism (B&H Academic, 2005) Comfort, Philip. W. and David P. Barrett, The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts (Wheaton; Tyndale House, 2001) 3 de Hoop, Raymond, “Unit Delimitation and Exegesis. Isaiah 56 as an Introduction to the Theme,” in The Impact of Unit Delimitation on Exegesis. Edited by Raymond de Hoop, Marjo C. A. Korpel, Stanley E. Porter (Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2009), 1-19. Ehrman, Bart, Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (San Francisco: HarperCollins Publishers, 2006) Eusebius of Caesarea, The Ecclesiastical History, 2 vols., tr. Kirsopp Lake, Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1926…) Evans, Craig, and Emmanuel Tov, eds, Exploring the Origins of the Bible: Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective (Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology) Gamble, Harry Y., Books and Readers in the Early Church (Yale University Press, 1997) Hill, C. E., “Rightly Dividing the Word: Uncovering an Early Template for Textual Division in John’s Gospel,” in Daniel M. Gurtner, Juan Hernández, Jr., Paul Foster, eds., ed., Studies on the Text of the New Testament and Early Christianity in Honor of Michael W. Holmes. New Testament Tools, Studies, and Documents. Leiden: Brill (forthcoming, 2015). ______“A Four-Gospel Canon in the Second Century? Artifact and Arti-fiction.” Early Christianity 4 (2013), 310-334. ______“Irenaeus, the Scribes, and the Scriptures. Papyrological and Theological Observations from P.Oxy 3.405” in Sara Parvis and Paul Foster, eds., Irenaeus: Life, Scripture, Legacy. Minneapolis: Fortress Press (2012), 119-130. Hill, Charles E. and Michael J. Kruger, The Early Text of the New Testament (Oxford, 2012) Hurtado, “Review of Roger S. Bagnall, Early Christian Books in Egypt, Review of Biblical Literature (2010), http://rblnewsletter.blogspot.com/2010_01_01archive.html (2010). Hurtado, Larry, Hurtado, “The Greek Fragments of the as Artefacts: Papyrological Observations no . 1, and ,” in Das Thomasevangelium. Entstehung – Rezeption – Theologie. Edited by Jörg Frey, Enno Edzard Popkes and Jens Schröter (Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008), 19-31. Johnson, William A., “Function of the Paragraphos in Greek Literary Prose Text,” ZPE 100 (1994), 65-68. Metzger, Bruce, Manuscripts of the Greek Bible (Oxford: OUP, 1981) Metzger, Bruce and Bart Ehrman, The Text of the New Testament fourth edition (Oxford, 2005) Nongbri, Brent, “The Use and Abuse of P52: Papyrological Pitfalls in Dating of the Fourth Gospel,” HTR 98 (2005), 23-48 ______“The Limits of Palaeographic Dating of Literary Papyri: Some Observations on the Date and Provenance of P. Bodmer II (P66),” Museum Helveticum 71 (2014): 1- 35. Orsini, Pasquale and Willy Clarysse, “Early New Testament Manuscripts and Their Dates. A Critique of Theological Palaeography,” ETL 88 (2012), 443-74 Parker, David C., An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and their Texts (Cambridge, 2008) 4

Porter, Stanley E., “Pericope Markers in Some Early Greek New Testament Manuscripts,” in Marjo C. A. Korpel and Josepf M. Oesch, eds., Layout Markers in Biblical Manuscripts and Ugaritic Tablets (Assen: Van Gorcum, 2005),161-76 ______How We Got the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013). Stewart, Robert, ed., The Reliability of the New Testament: Bart Ehrman and Daniel Wallace in Dialogue (Fortress, 2011) Swanson, Reuben J., Galatians, New Testament Greek Manuscripts: Variant Readings Arranged in Horizontal Lines against Codex Vaticanus (Wheaton, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 1999) – there are 8 other books in this series: the 4 Gospels, Acts, Romans, 1&2 Corinthians Tov, Emanuel, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible (Fortress, 3rd edn., 2011) Ulrich, Eugene, The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Origins of the Bible (Grand Rapids/ Cambridge/ et al.: Eerdmans/Brill, 1999), 99-120. Wegner, Paul, A Student’s Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible. Its History, Methods and Results (IVP Academic, 2006) Wachtel, Klaus and Michael W. Holmes, eds., The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research (Society of Biblical Literature, 2011)

Classroom Procedure For the first half of the course, most of the class time will be taken up in the discussion of readings and the examination of manuscripts. For the second half, most of class time will be taken up in the comparison of the class’s work on textual division in early Christian manuscripts.

Assignments and Grading COMPONENT % OF GRADE Readings 20 Terminology Quiz 20 Manuscript work 60 100

SCHEDULE NOTE: The assignments are subject to change NOTE: Before the first class, please read Metzger, Bruce, Manuscripts of the Greek Bible, 1-48.

Week 1 Introduction to the Course Feb 12 Internet Resources Students will come to the first class having read Metzger, Bruce, Manuscripts of the Greek Bible, 1-48. (49 pp.), and ready to discuss.

Week 2 Paleography Feb 19 Students will come to class ready to discuss: 5

Readings: Orsini, Pasquale, and Willy Clarisse, “Early New Testament Manuscripts and their Dates” (32 pp.) Cavallo, G. “Greek and Latin Writing in the Papyri,” pp. 101-48. Nongbri, Brent, “The Use and Abuse of P52: Papyrological Pitfalls in Dating of the Fourth Gospel.” (26 pp.) Barker, Don, “The Dating of New Testament Manuscripts.” (12 pp.)

Optional Reading: Hurtado, “Review of Roger S. Bagnall, Early Christian Books in Egypt, Review of Biblical Literature (2010) at http://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/7755_9195.pdf

Week 3 Codicology Feb 26 Students will come to class ready to discuss: Readings Turner, Eric C., The Typology of the Early Codex

Week 4 Textual Division in Early Manuscripts Mar 5 Students will begin to familiarize themselves with images of Vaticanus and the early NT papyri from the various websites. They will also come to class ready to discuss: Readings: Johnson, William A., “The Function of the Paragraphos in Greek Literary Prose Text.” (4 pp.) de Hoop, Raymond, “Unit Delimitation and Exegesis. Isaiah 56 as an Introduction to the Theme.” (20 pp.) McArthur, H. K. “The Earliest Divisions of the Gospels.” (7 pp.) Porter, Stanley, “Pericope Markers in Some Early Greek New Testament Manuscripts.” (16 pp.) Adams, Sean, “Sense Units and Manuscript Families: A Test Proposal,”(31 pp.) at https://www.academia.edu/30100546/_Sense_Units_and_Manuscript_Families_A_Test_ Proposal_in_Lois_K._Fuller_Dow_Craig_A._Evans_and_Andrew_W._Pitts_eds._The_L anguage_and_Literature_of_the_New_Testament_Essays_in_Honour_of_Stanley_E._Por ter_s_60th_Birthday_BIS_150_Leiden_Brill_2016_174-204

TERMINOLOGY QUIZ

Week 5 Textual Division of The Gospel of John Mar 12 Reading: Hill, “Rightly Dividing the Word: Uncovering an Early Template for Textual Division in John’s Gospel.” (16 pp.) 6

Students will have read “Rightly Dividing,” and have worked through the chart, comparing to online images, in order to learn the method. Come to class ready to discuss your work.

Additional Reading: Hill, “Irenaeus, the Scribes, and the Scriptures. Papyrological and Theological Observations from P.Oxy 3.405” in Sara Parvis and Paul Foster, eds., Irenaeus: Life, Scripture, Legacy. Minneapolis: Fortress Press (2012), 119-130. (12 pp.)

Reading Week

Week 6 Textual Division of The Gospels of Luke Mar 26 Students will work through the chart on Luke in Hill, “Vaticanus and Its Predecessors in the NT,” checking them for accuracy, and come to class ready to discuss their work.

Additional Reading: Charlesworth, Scott D., “Indicators of Catholicity in Early Gospel Manuscripts.” (12 pp.)

Week 7 Textual Division of The Gospels of Matthew Apr 2 and mark Students will work through the chart on Matthew and Mark in Hill, “Vaticanus and Its Predecessors in the NT,” checking them for accuracy, and come to class ready to discuss their work.

Additional Reading: Hurtado, Larry, “The Greek Fragments of the Gospel of Thomas as Artefacts: Papyrological Observations on Papyrus. Oxyrhynchus 1, Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 654 and papyrus Oxyrhynchus 655.” (22 pp.)

Week 8 Student Work in Progress Apr 9 For the rest of the course we will be examining textual division in early NT and OT manuscripts, with other reading assignments and projects possible.

Week 9 Student Work in Progress Apr 16

7

Week 10 Student Work in Progress Apr 23

Week 11 Student Work in Progress Apr 30

Week 12 Student Work in Progress (Professor gone) May 7

Week 13 Final Reports/Submission of Student work May 14