DOCSLIB.ORG

WHO's WHO Shell Brian Foley, Contracts Manager, Corrib Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OSSL SHELL CORRIB SAGA - WHO'S WHO Shell Brian Foley, Contracts Manager, Corrib Project: [email protected] Julia Busby, Head of Shell Legal: [email protected] Frances van Dam, from Shell's business integrity department: [email protected] Charles Hornsby, Ethics and Compliance Officer at Shell Downstream [email protected] Bridgit Lowe, head of Shell Legal, Ireland [email protected] John Gallagher: [email protected] (Exec VP Shell Global Upstream) Alan Mee: Assistance Mayo Manager: [email protected] Ann Hamilton, Shell Corrib Financial Director: [email protected] Wim-Peter Vanbel, [email protected] (regional head Business Integrity Dept Europe & Russia Christy Loftus, Shell Ireland Communications: Christy Loftus [email protected] Michiel Brandjes, Company Sec. & General Counsel: [email protected] Agnes Mclaverty, Permits and Consents Manager for Shell E&P Ireland Limited: [email protected] Mary Barrett, Emergency Response Co-Ordinator Shell [email protected] Peter Voser, RDS PIc CEO: [email protected] Conner Byrne, Shell EP Ireland" (said to have demanded that invoices be falsified and diverted to Roadbridge to avoid any direct connection with Shell - also said to have threatened that OSSL would never work again in oil and gas industry if it revealed any of the activity) Terry Nolan, former CEO, Shell E&P Ireland Michael Crothers, CEO Shell E&P Ireland: [email protected] (said to have "personally felt some moral obligation ..." ) Roadbridge (Main Contractor on Corrib Project?) OSSL people Desmond Kane: [email protected] Amanda Kane Neil Rooney: [email protected] OSSL Supporter/agent/employee? - GEORGE HAMILTON George Hamilton: georgehamiltoneollve.ie Sent email in support of OSSL to Shell to Sea, also made several postings on our "Shell Blog", all supportive of OSSL. Seems to have inside information. Alleged Third Party Beneficiaries Mrs Noone Mr Eamon Sweeny Jacintha Healey Collotys Tracey Murray, Solicitor acting for Jacintha Healy and Mary Kate Healey Family alleged by OSSL to have been "love bombed" by Shell to get Corrib project offthe ground: [email protected] (Phone: 098-36897) KPMG DUBLIN Liam Grimes: liam.grimeseokpmg.ie (Grimes said to have warned OSSL via their accountant John MacNally of FMB Dublin, that they could end up in jail) John, Partner FMB Dublin Phone: +353-1-645 2002 Fax: +353-1-645 2049 E-Mail: enqulryeofmb.ie OSSL SOLICITORS? - LAVELLCOLEMAN Marc Fitzgibbon, Partner: Marc@lavellecolemanje IRISH POLICE (THE GARDA) Martin Callinan, Garda Commissioner martin.callinaneagarda.ie (OSSL claims in an email dated 6 Feb 2013 that it sent a request by recorded post seeking the intervention of Mr Callinan) Detective Chief Superintendent John Gilligan: john.gilliganeogarda.ie Superintendent Patrick Diskin: patrick.diskineagarda.ie Superintendent Joe Gannon [oe.gannoneagarda.ie Vermilion Energy - Partner in Corrib Project Martin Bolt [email protected] Doherty Ryan & Associates - Dublin Solicitors R Doherty: [email protected] P J Henehan of FS Taxation Dublin [email protected] Statoil - Partner in Corrib Project [email protected] IRISH MINISTRY FOR JUSTICE & EQUALITY Alan Shatter TD, Minister for Justice & Equality Damien Brennan, his Private Secretary info@justiceje The ....• Company ry 2(111 of GUll' ComCBnl" ,I 828t6 Deal' Mr. Man cheCl. T WtlU'cJ as.1cthat vou refer ellI wrr~ptmde te the Superintendent at Ekllmulle\ Garcia stauen. 'tours sll'\C!!rely. Subject: Marc please forward this to Shell legal From: [email protected] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 201109:03:52 +0100 To: Marc@lavellecolemanje Marc Fitzgibbon for OSSL has been told to contact ROADBRIDGE direct By Jilly White ROADBRIDGE played no part in the make up of the twenty one TOXIC invoices In the second week of May 2007 Shell informed OSSL that ifthey wanted "f*#king paid for our outlay" then we would transfer these invoices to Roadbridge for payment and disguise the content in a manner instructed by Shell Roadbridge had no knowledge of the content of these invoices ROADBRIDGE can not make the adjustment unless instructed by SHELL SHELL must attend any meeting with OSSL LAVELLECOLEMAN and ROADBRIDGE if Any progress is to be made The OSSL Company From: THE OSSL COMPANY<[email protected]> Date: 7 October 201110:51:35 BST To: <john.gilligancagarda.ie> Cc: Terry Nolan <[email protected]>, <harry.fehilytiahoms.ie>. <rnarcealavellecoleman.ie>, <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Garda AIcoholjSpecial Favours for Landowners Your Ref: PRO 3B.2/11 Further to our previous correspondence, please see the below. Subject: Garda AIcoholjSpecial Favours for Landowners From: [email protected] Date: MOD, 3 Oct 201111:47:49 +0100 CC: Marc@lavellecolemanje To: [email protected]; [email protected] Terry Two things: Firstly, we have not been contacted by Roadbridge regarding resolving this matter. Secondly, your local press have since last Friday been pestering OSSL. They would appear to know about the special favours in scant detail but not about the alcohol. OSSL,of course, remain silent on the matter. I think it so important Terry that we divide out the Garda matter. Kindest Regards Desmond Sent from my iPad TRACEY MURRAY Solicitor Mulranny Phone: 098- 36897 Westport Co. Mayo [email protected] Mr. Desmond Paul Kane The OSSLCompany Bangor Erris Co. Mayo E-mail to:[email protected] rr" February, 2012. MY CLIENTS: JACINTHA HEALY AND MARY KATE HEALY Dear Mr. Kane I act for Jacintha Healy and Mary Kate Healy, both of Ballinaboy, Co. Mayo. I refer to your recent correspondence to my clients in which you state the following: (1) That you have been informed that if any works were carried out by Shell on my clients' properties, that this would have been "corrupt and should never have taken place." (2) That you have taken money out of your own pocket to improve the situation of my clients. (3) That all goods bought and paid for on Shell's behalf remain your property until paid for in full. My clients strongly object to the tone of your correspondence and to the implication that they have been involved in some kind of corrupt activity. There is also the suggestion that you may seek to retrieve goods from my clients' premises. If you have any grievance arising out of your dealings with Shell, that is a matter between yourselves and them, and is no concern of my clients. Please do not approach my clients in relation to this matter again. If you have any further need to contact them, please do so through my office. Yours faithfully TRACEYMURRAY -----Original Message----- From: OSSL [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 22 May 201206:31 To: Crothers, Michael J SEPIL-UIE/T /1 Subject: Recent meeting update Dear Sir My we respectfully request an immediate update re KMPG input as discussed last Thursday With respect Desmond Paul Kane OSSL Telephone (0044) 075 90 11 07 17 On 22 May 2012, at 07:22, <[email protected]> wrote: Mr. Kane, Liam Grimes, Tax Director at KPMG met with your accountant on Friday morning and discussed the accounting treatment together. Liam called me later in the day to say that Liam had not changed his interpretation. My understanding was that your accountant was going to reflect on the conversation and advise you - you may want to check with him for his latest views. Michael Managing Director, Shell E&P Ireland Limited Registered Office Corrib House 52 Lower Leeson Street Dublin 2 Ireland Registered in Ireland Number 316588 Directors: MJ Crothers, JG Egan, AM Hamilton From: OSSL [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 22 May 2012 12:26 To: Crothers, Michael J SEPIL-UIE/T /1 Subject: Re: Recent meeting update Dear Sir Took your advise and spoke to John Macnally re his meeting with Shell KPMG Mr Grimes. I wish to make this observation off the record and only as a conversation between our selves and not Shell OSSL . If you ever want to fill a man with resolve that will fuel him in his determination to see a situation through to an honest conclusion then, Firstly ...Tell him in front of his legal representative at ten forty five on a Thursday that you SHELL did in fact shut his company down abruptly, without notice,and immorally. Then secondly ...send the all powerful KPMG to his accounts office at nine am Friday the following day to inform him through his advisor that a prison sentence is the likely outcome of being involved in the supply of large amounts of Alcohol to the Irish Police Force and for allowing his company to be used by SHELL for the falsification of invoices to suit SHELLS purposes in disguising payments in cash and favours for selected MAYOlocals. Always mindful that the aforementioned acts were carried out on SHELL instructions one wonders if KPMG were in receipt of all the detail to allow them to suggest prison was a real possibility . Yours in astonishment. Desmond. Desmond Paul Kane OSSL Telephone (0044) 075 90 11 07 17 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Recent meeting update Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:48:43 +0000 I did not say that "Shell shut down your company immorally". I was careful to say that I personally felt some moral obligation to try to find a way to find a settlement, hence the without prejudice offer that was made. Would you like to meet again soon to continue discussions? Michael Managing Director, Shell E&P Ireland Limited Registered Office Corrib House 52 Lower Leeson Street Dublin 2 Ireland Registered in Ireland Number 316588 Directors: MJ Crothers, JG Egan, AM Hamilton From: OSSL <[email protected]> Date: 23 May 201207:50:43 BST To: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Recent meeting update Dear Sir Thank you for your reply ,the words are all there if the are in the correct order or not they still spell the closure dispite our protestation Shell .
Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 I Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction

    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 I Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction

    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 i Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction CONTENTS ABOUT SHELL INTRODUCTION Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies employing 90,000 people in more than 80 i ABOUT SHELL countries. Our aim is to help meet the energy needs of 1 INTRODUCTION FROM THE CEO society in ways that are economically, environmentally and socially responsible. OUR APPROACH Upstream 2 BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FUTURE Upstream consists of two organisations, Upstream International and Upstream Americas. Upstream searches for and recovers oil 3 SD AND OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY and natural gas, extracts heavy oil from oil sands for conversion 4 SAFETY into synthetic crudes, liqueƂ es natural gas and produces synthetic oil products using gas-to-liquids technology. It often works in joint 5 COMMUNITIES ventures, including those with national oil companies. Upstream 6 CLIMATE CHANGE markets and trades natural gas and electricity in support of its business. Our wind power activities are part of Upstream. Upstream 8 ENVIRONMENT International co-ordinates sustainable development policies and 9 LIVING BY OUR PRINCIPLES social performance across Shell. Downstream OUR ACTIVITIES Downstream manufactures, supplies and markets oil products and 10 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION chemicals worldwide. Our Manufacturing and Supply businesses include reƂ neries, chemical plants and the supply and distribution 11 KEY PROJECTS of feedstocks and products. Marketing sells a range of products 12 DELIVERING ENERGY RESPONSIBLY including fuels, lubricants, bitumen and liqueƂ ed petroleum 12 Natural gas gas for home, transport and industrial use. Chemicals markets 15 The Arctic petrochemicals for industrial customers.
  • Irish Landscape Names

    Irish Landscape Names

    Irish Landscape Names Preface to 2010 edition Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, more comprehensive. marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips.
  • Corrib Gas Onshore Pipeline Community Information

    Corrib Gas Onshore Pipeline Community Information

    CORRIB GAS ONSHORE PIPELINE COMMUNITY INFORMATION EXCELLENCE. TRUST. RESPECT. RESPONSIBILITY. Corrib Gas Onshore Pipeline p1 Community Information CORRIB GAS ONSHORE PIPELINE COMMUNITY INFORMATION CONTENTS Introduction Background to this document 3 Onshore pipeline & landfall valve installation External Emergency Response Plan 4 Onshore pipeline details Location of the onshore pipeline 7 Map 8 Emergency services response Command and control arrangements on location 11 Inner and Outer Cordon 11 Traffic Cordons 12 Rendezvous Points (RVPS) 12 Rendezvous Point 1 Traffic Cordon 13 Rendezvous Point 2 Traffic Cordon 13 Rendezvous Point 3 Traffic Cordon 13 Rendezvous Point 14 Information to the public 15 How neighbours will be notified of an incident 15 How the public will be kept informed 16 Emergency response exercises 16 Excavating in the vicinity of the pipeline 16 Do’s and Don’ts 17 1 HSE...EVERYWHERE. EVERYDAY. EVERYONE. Corrib Gas Onshore Pipeline p3 Community Information INTRODUCTION Our Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Vision is an extension of our core values of Excellence, Trust, Respect and Responsibility, and reflects our commitment to conducting our activities in a manner that will protect the health and safety of our employees, contractors and communities. This is Vermilion’s highest priority. At the core of our business is our purpose: we believe that producing energy for the many people and businesses that rely upon it to meet their daily needs and sustain their quality of life is both a great privilege and a great responsibility. Nothing is more important to us than the safety of the public and those who work with us, and the protection of our natural surroundings.
  • Royal Dutch Shell and Its Sustainability Troubles

    Royal Dutch Shell and Its Sustainability Troubles

    Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 Albert ten Kate May 2011 1 Colophon Title: Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 May 2011. This report is made on behalf of Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) Author: Albert ten Kate, free-lance researcher corporate social responsibility Pesthuislaan 61 1054 RH Amsterdam phone: (+31)(0)20 489 29 88 mobile: (+31)(0)6 185 68 354 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Contents Introduction 4 Methodology 5 Cases: 1. Muddling through in Nigeria 6 1a) oil spills 1b) primitive gas flaring 1c) conflict and corruption 2. Denial of Brazilian pesticide diseases 14 3. Mining the Canadian tar sands 17 4. The bitter taste of Brazil's sugarcane 20 4a) sourcing sugarcane from occupiers of indigenous land 4b) bad labour conditions sugarcane harvesters 4c) massive monoculture land use 5. Fracking unconventional gas 29 6. Climate change, a business case? 35 7. Interfering with politics 38 8. Drilling plans Alaska’s Arctic Ocean 42 9. Sakhalin: the last 130 Western Gray Whales 45 10. The risky Kashagan oil field 47 11. A toxic legacy in Curaçao 49 12. Philippines: an oil depot amidst a crowd of people 52 3 Introduction Measured in revenue, Royal Dutch Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world. According to its annual report of 2010, its revenue amounted to USD 368 billion in 2010. Shell produces oil and gas in 30 countries, spread over the world.
  • 2005 Annual Report on Form 20-F

    2005 Annual Report on Form 20-F

    United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 Commission file number 1-32575 Royal Dutch Shell plc (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands tel. no: (011 31 70) 377 9111 (Address of principal executive offices) Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered American Depositary Receipts representing Class A ordinary shares of the New York Stock Exchange issuer of an aggregate nominal value €0.07 each American Depositary Receipts representing Class B ordinary shares of the New York Stock Exchange issuer of an aggregate nominal value of €0.07 each Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act None Securities For Which There is a Reporting Obligation Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. Outstanding as of December 31, 2005: 3,817,240,213 Class A ordinary shares of the nominal value of €0.07 each. 2,707,858,347 Class B ordinary shares of the nominal value of €0.07 each. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
  • Lessons Not Learned the Other Shell Report 2004 Dedicated to the Memory of Ken Saro-Wiwa

    Lessons Not Learned the Other Shell Report 2004 Dedicated to the Memory of Ken Saro-Wiwa

    Lessons Not Learned The Other Shell Report 2004 Dedicated to the memory of Ken Saro-Wiwa “My lord, we all stand before history. I am a man of peace. Appalled by the denigrating poverty of my people who live on a richly-endowed land . anxious to preserve their right to life and to a decent living, and determined to usher into this country . a fair and just democratic system which protects everyone and every ethnic group and gives us all a valid claim to human civilization. I have devoted all my intellectual and material resources, my very life, to a cause in which I have total belief and from which I cannot be blackmailed or intimidated. I have no doubt at all about the ultimate success of my cause . Not impris- onment nor death can stop our ultimate victory.” —Ken Saro-Wiwa’s final statement before his execution on 10 November 1995 Guide to contents 1 Guide to contents 2 Foreword from Tony Juniper & Vera Dalm This report is based largely on evidence from people Tony Juniper, Executive Director, Friends of the Earth (England, around the world who live in the shadows of Shell’s vari- Wales & Northern Ireland) & Vera Dalm, Director, Milieudefensie ous operations. This report is written on behalf of (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) Friends of the Earth (FOE); Advocates for Environmental Human Rights; Coletivo Alternative Verde; Community In- 3 The Year in Review power Development Association; Concerned Citizens of Norco; Environmental Rights Action (FOE Nigeria); 4 Niger Delta, Nigeria Global Community Monitor; groundWork (FOE South Injustice as a Shell Trademark Africa); Humane Care Foundation Curacao; Louisiana Bucket Brigade; Niger-Delta Project for the Environment, 7 Durban, South Africa Human Rights and Development; Pacific Environment Communities Doomed with Aging Refinery Watch; Sakhalin Environment Watch; Shell to Sea; South Durban Community Environmental Alliance; and 10 Sao Paulo, Brazil United Front to Oust Oil Depots.
  • The Corrib Gas Tunnel &gt;&gt;&gt;

    The Corrib Gas Tunnel >>>

    The Corrib Gas Tunnel >>> Contents > The Corrib Tunnel > The Aughoose and Glengad sites > BAM Civil/Wayss & Freytag Joint Venture > A brief history of tunnelling > ‘Fionnuala’ – the Corrib TBM > Tunnelling traditions > How does the TBM work? > The TBM operator > Maintaining the tunnel > Installation of the pipeline & reinstatement 1 The Corrib Tunnel The onshore pipeline is the final phase of the Corrib gas project to be completed. The onshore pipeline section is 8.3km long and 4.9km of this will be installed in a tunnel, 5.5m the majority of which will run under Sruwaddacon Bay, in north Mayo. The tunnel will have an external diameter of 4.2m and an internal 12m diameter of 3.5m and will run at depths of between 5.5m and 12m under Sruwaddacon Bay. The building of the tunnel requires 4.2m 3.5m the use of a large tunnel boring machine (TBM). “This will be the longest tunnel in Ireland and 2 the longest gas pipeline 3 tunnel in Europe” “The rock, sand and gravel from the TBM is pumped back through the tunnel to Aughoose” “The compound has been surrounded by a visual barrier and an acoustic fence” The Aughoose and Glengad sites Excavation of the tunnel is in one direction, starting at a launch shaft The compound at Aughoose contains all of the services and Aughoose compound was designed and constructed to limit its site water treatment plant where the water discharges into on a SEPIL-owned site in the townland of Aughoose and running to a materials needed for the tunnelling process.
  • The Corrib Debacle

    The Corrib Debacle

    1. THE CORRIB DEBACLE – WHY IRELAND IS COMPLETELY OFF LIMITS FOR INVESTMENT 1.1 The background to the debacle Natural gas generates over 60% of the electricity in Ireland and fuels homes and industry. While the Kinsale Field was discovered and developed in the early seventies, gas from the European network is currently pumped into the reservoir there over the summer and drawn out over the winter months. Very little is drawn any more from the field itself. Indeed a single gas pipeline from the European grid goes to a compressor station in South Western Scotland and then is routed under the Irish Sea to North of Dublin. The country is hanging off that pipe! Ireland has not had a good innings with petroleum exploration. About 150 exploration wells have been drilled in the Irish Sector, outside of Kinsale Field we had to wait until 1996 until Enterprise Energy Ireland finally hit pay dirt with the Corrib Natural Gas Field. Note: Shell Exploration and Production Ireland Ltd (SEPIL) acquired Enterprise Energy Ireland in 2002. A pretty poor run from exploration in Irish waters, in particular given that a drilling rig costs about €0.6 million per day and the success ratio in the North Sea sector is about one producing field for every four exploration wells drilled. 1 Bit of a difference in petroleum finds in North Sea and Irish waters. However, many Irish are insistent that the same exploration terms should apply in both jurisdictions. The Corrib field is marginal by international standards; the well head is 80 km off the exposed North Western Coast and at a depth of 300 m.
  • Notice of Meeting 2013 | Reports.Shell.Com

    Notice of Meeting 2013 | Reports.Shell.Com

    SEE INSIDE FOR NEWS OF RETAIL SHAREHOLDERS PRESENTATION IN LONDON NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC CIRCUSTHEATER, CIRCUSSTRAAT 4, THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS TUESDAY MAY 21, 2013 AT 10:00 (DUTCH TIME) THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION If you are in any doubt about what action to take, you should seek your own personal advice immediately from a financialadvisor authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 if you are in the UK or, if you are not, from another appropriately authorised financialadvisor . If you have sold or transferred all your shares in Royal Dutch Shell plc (the “Company”), please give this letter and the accompanying documents to the stockbroker or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for transmission to the purchaser. 2449_SHE_Notice_of_Meeting_ENG_20.indd 1 27-03-13 10:43 2 Notice of Meeting 2013 | reports.shell.com 3 8 15 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER BIOGRAPHIES RETAIL SHAREHOLDERS PRESENTATION, LONDON 4 10 NOTICE OF ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER NOTES GENERAL MEETING 14 6 ATTENDANCE EXPLANATORY NOTES ARRANGEMENTS ON RESOLUTIONS AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENTS E-COMMUNICATION The Company’s Annual Report and Form 20-F for the year If you are a registered shareholder and hold your shares ended December 31, 2012 and the Annual Review and in your own name, or you hold your shares in the Royal Summary Financial Statements 2012 can be found at Dutch Shell Corporate Nominee, you can choose to view www.shell.com/annualreport shareholder communications (for example, the Company’s and the 2013 Notice of Meeting can be found at Annual Report and Annual Review and Summary Financial www.shell.com/agm Statements) by means of our website instead of receiving paper communications.
  • Fossil Fuel Subsidies in Ireland Financing Climate Chaos

    Fossil Fuel Subsidies in Ireland Financing Climate Chaos

    Fossil fuel subsidies in Ireland Financing Climate Chaos Citizens for Financial Justice project March 2020 Author: Clodagh Daly 1 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….8 1. Natural gas 1. ‘Meet the new boss, same as the old boss’: the myth of natural gas as a transition fuel……………………………………………………………………………….10 2. Box 1: Shaping transition narratives……………………………………………..12 3. A ‘leisurely’ climate emergency? Natural gas in the Irish policy context……….13 2. Subsidies 1. What is a ‘subsidy’? Overcoming ambiguous definitions……………………….18 2. The case for removing natural gas production subsidies……………………...…20 3. Case studies 1. Public finance as a pillar for natural gas infrastructure………………………….25 2. Tax exemptions, i.e. ‘fossil fuel welfare’………………………………………..31 3. Investments by State-owned enterprises…………………………………………35 4. Fiscal support…………………………………………………………………….41 4. Conclusion and recommendations……………………………………………………….45 5. Annex…………………………………………………………………………………….47 Executive summary Natural gas is a highly potent fossil fuel consisting of mostly methane gas that can trap heat up to 86 times more efficiently than carbon dioxide in a 20-year period. According to the IPCC, there is no pathway to remain within 1.5°C that is compatible with natural gas expansion.1 However, the fossil fuel industry presents energy interests as a critical element of Ireland’s transition. Irish energy and climate policy describe gas as a ‘transition’ fuel whose share in the energy mix is consistent with Ireland’s climate objectives.2 Conversely, a central element of a transition underpinned by science and climate justice requires governments to make financial flows and energy investments ‘consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development’ in accordance with Article 2.1c of the Paris agreement.
  • E Corrib Gas Project: the Deposition of 450,000 Tonnes of Peat

    E Corrib Gas Project: the Deposition of 450,000 Tonnes of Peat

    PEAT IN ENERGY e Corrib gas project: the deposition of 450,000 tonnes of peat B. Moyles Bord na Móna Energy Ltd, Leabeg, Tullamore, Co. Offaly, Ireland Phone: +353-87-9612077, e-mail: [email protected] Summary As part of Shell’s Corrib gas project to construct an onshore gas terminal at Bellanaboy, North-west Mayo, Ireland it was necessary to remove approximately 450,000 m³ of peat from the terminal footprint. The excavation works were carried out by a civil engineering contractor (Roadbridge Ltd.) and this excavated peat was then transported by a road haulier (Iggy Madden Transport Ltd.) a distance of 11km by road to a specially constructed deposition site owned and operated by Bord na Móna. This peat deposition site, where the removed peat was received, re-loaded for internal site haulage and finally placed, is located on industrial cutaway peatlands in Srahmore, near Bangor-Erris in Co. Mayo, Ireland. The peat deposition process was included as part of the planning application for Shell E&P Ireland Ltd (SEPIL) to construct a gas terminal for the reception and separation of gas from the Corrib gas field. The deposition was governed by numerous planning conditions, also separate conditions imposed as part of the waste licence as issued by the EPA. The peat was received at Srahmore and spread over low areas (bays) to depths of on average 1.4m - 1.8m. The deposited peat was then profiled allowing for water run off. Following deposition activities and the im - plementation of the agreed monitoring programme vegetation was allowed to establish naturally, primarily soft rush ( Juncus effusus ) as well as other native peatland species.
  • COOLTRANS (Dense Phase Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Transportation)

    COOLTRANS (Dense Phase Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Transportation)

    COOLTRANS (Dense Phase Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Transportation) WP5.2.1 Social impacts of the installation of pipeline networks Interim Project Report Clair Gough, Laura O’Keefe and Sarah Mander Tyndall Centre, University of Manchester Aug 2012 Page | 1 Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Pipeline safety ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Transport infrastructure and Risk Assessment ............................................................................. 7 1.3 Potential hazards .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Commonly cited incidents involving CO2 ...................................................................................... 8 2. Social impact: Examples from previous pipelines and CO2 projects ............................................... 9 Weyburn Monitoring and Storage Project .......................................................................................... 9 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Conflicts........................................................................................................................................