VOLUME IIB ATTACHMENT 1D Agency Correspondence And

ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT Resource Report 1: Project Description

VOLUME IIB

ATTACHMENT 1D

Agency Correspondence and Public Outreach

February 2015

ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT Resource Report 1: Project Description

CONTENTS

Project Introduction Letters – June 25, 2014 and August 26, 2014

Correspondence with Federal Agencies

Correspondence with Pennsylvania Agencies

Correspondence with Ohio Agencies

Correspondence with Michigan Agencies

Public Official Outreach

1 February 2015

PROJECT INTRODUCTION LETTERS Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Introduction Letter – June 25, 2014

FEDERAL

Ginger Mullins Chief, Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District 502 Eighth Street Huntington, WV 25701-2070

Scott Hans Chief, Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District 1000 Liberty Avenue, Suite 2200 Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Diane C. Kozlowski Chief, Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District 1776 Niagara Street Buffalo, NY 14207

John Konik Chief, Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit District 77 Michigan Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226-2550.

Tinka Hyde Division Director, Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 (OH, MI) 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604

Gary Jensen, Team Leader U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration National Scenic Byways Program 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Gary C. Chancey Public Affairs Officer U.S. Forest Service Wayne National Forest 13700 US Highway 33 Nelsonville, OH 45764

1 of 5 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Introduction Letter – June 25, 2014

John Schmidt, Project Leader U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service West Virginia Ecological Services Field Office 694 Beverly Pike Elkins, WV 26241

Lora Zimmerman, Project Leader/Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Pennsylvania Ecological Services Field Office 315 South Allen Street, Suite 322 State College, PA 16801

Mary Knapp, Ph.D., Field Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Ohio Ecological Services Field Office 4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, OH 43230

Scott Hicks, Field Office Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service East Lansing Ecological Services Field Office 2651 Coolidge Road East Lansing, MI 48823

Scott G. Mandirola, Division Director Division of Water and Waste Management West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304

WEST VIRGINIA

Scott G. Mandirola, Division Director Division of Water and Waste Management West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304

John A. Benedict, Director Division of Air Quality West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304

Director, Office of Land and Streams West Virginia Division of Natural Resources 324 Fourth Avenue South Charleston, WV 25303

2 of 5 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Introduction Letter – June 25, 2014

Susan Pierce, Director/Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer West Virginia Division of Culture and History The Culture Center, Capitol Complex 1900 Kanawha Boulevard East Charleston WV 25305-0300

PENNSYLVANIA

Sue Malone, Regional Director Southwest (Pittsburgh) Regional Office Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 400 Waterfront Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Lauren Imgrund, Director Bureau of Recreation and Conservation Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17105-8552

Director, Division of Environmental Services Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission 450 Robson Lane Bellefonte, PA 16823-7437

William A. Capouillez, Director Bureau of Wildlife Habitat Management Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) 2001 Elmerton Avenue, Harrisburgh, PA 17110-9797

Doug McLearen, Division Chief, Archaeology and Protection Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission Commonwealth Keystone Building, Second Floor 400 North Street Harrisburg, PA 17120-0093

OHIO

Craig W. Butler, Director Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43216-1049

Carl Gebhardt, Division Chief Division of Surface Water Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43216-1049

3 of 5 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Introduction Letter – June 25, 2014

Rachel Taulbee, Supervisor Division of Air Pollution Control Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43216-1049

Director, Division of Wildlife Ohio Department of Natural Resources 2045 Morse Road Columbus, OH 43229-6693

Mark J. Epstein Department Head, Resource Protection and Review State Historic Preservation Office 800 E. 17th Avenue Columbus, OH 43211

Todd Schaffer, Operations Stark County Park District 5300 Tyner Street, NW Canton, OH 44708

MICHIGAN

Mary Vanderlaan, District Coordinator Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Lansing District Office Water Resources Division 525 West Allegan Street (Constitution Hall) Lansing, MI 48909-7742

Jon Russell, District Coordinator Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Jackson District Office Water Resources Division 301 East Louis Glick Highway Jackson, MI 49101-1556

Andy Hartz, District Coordinator Water Resources Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Southeast Michigan District Office 27700 Donald Court Warren, MI 48092—2793

Keith Creagh, Director Michigan Department of Natural Resources 525 West Allegan Street, PO Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909

4 of 5 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Introduction Letter – June 25, 2014

Jenifer Olsen, Lands – Oakland County Michigan Department of Natural Resources Rose Lake Wildlife Office 8562 East Stoll Road East Lansing, MI 48823

Martha MacFarlane-Faes Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Michigan State Housing Development Authority Historic Preservation 702 W. Kalamazoo St., P.O. Box 30740 Lansing, MI 48909-8240

5 of 5 June 25, 2014

[Name Agency Street City, State, Zip ]

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Pre-Filing Review Process Notification

Dear Sir or Madam:

ET Rover Pipeline LLC (ET Rover) is proposing to construct, own, and operate the Rover Pipeline Project (Project), a new interstate natural gas transmission pipeline extending for approximately 600 miles through parts of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, and ultimately into Ontario, Canada. The Project originated as a result of discussions with producers in the Marcellus and Utica Shale areas of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio desiring to move their production to markets in the Midwest and Canada.

The Project as currently proposed will provide transportation of 2.2 billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day of natural gas and will consist of construction of:

Supply Laterals: o Approximately 197 miles of 24, 36 and 42-inch diameter supply laterals, o Approximately 38,000 horsepower at five new compressor stations on the supply laterals, and o Various new meter stations in the supply areas. Mainline: o Approximately 186 miles of 36-inch/42-inch diameter mainline pipeline, o Approximately 194,000 horsepower at five new mainline compressor stations on the mainline, and o Two new meter stations along the mainline pipeline. Michigan Market Zone: o Approximately 179 miles of 42-inch diameter pipeline and o Three new meter stations within Michigan. Canadian Segment: o Approximately 15 miles of 42-inch diameter pipeline and o One new meter station at Union Gas at Dawn, Ontario.

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project June 25, 2014 Page 2 of 4

ET Rover has executed precedent agreements with anchor shippers representing 1.2 Bcf per day of the total capacity of 2.2 Bcf per day. ET Rover is evaluating additional Project scenarios with the overall pipeline capacity of up to 3.25 Bcf per day.

The Project facilities are detailed below and are shown on the attached General Location Map. Due to shipper commitments, the Rover Pipeline Project facilities will be constructed with phased in-service dates of December 2016, and June 2017, respectively.

The in-service date of December 2016 will include the following project facilities between the supply areas in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia to the Midwest Hub.

Capacity/ PIPELINES Miles Diameter Volume

Mainline - Leesville Plant to Midwest Hub 186 42-inch 2.2 Bcf/d

Supply Laterals (including Alternate Routes) Cadiz Plant to Leesville Plant 16 42-inch Hillman Plant to Leesville Plant 46 36-inch Clarington to Cadiz Plant 43 42-inch Majorsville Lateral 18 24-inch Seneca to Clarington 25 36-inch Sherwood to Clarington 49 36-inch

COMPRESSION

Mainline Compressor Stations - Approximately 194,000 horsepower at five (5) new mainline compressor stations to be located on the Leesville Plant to Midwest Hub Plant mainline route.

Carroll County CS Wayne County CS Richland County CS Seneca County CS Defiance County CS

Lateral Compressor Stations - Approximately 38,000 horsepower at five (5) new compressors to be located on supply laterals.

Harrison County CS Monroe County CS Doddridge County CS Noble County CS Marshall County CS Rover Pipeline Project June 25, 2014 Page 3 of 4

METER STATIONS

Receipt Meters – Various in supply area Delivery Meter - Midwest Hub-PEPL Delivery Meter - Midwest Hub-ANR

The in-service date of June 2017 will include the following project facilities between the Midwest Hub to the Union Gas Dawn Hub, Ontario, Canada. Capacity/ PIPELINES Miles Diameter Volume Michigan Market Zone – Midwest Hub to the International Border 179 42-inch 1.3 Bcf/d Canadian Market Zone – International Border to Dawn 15 36-inch 1.0 Bcf/d

METER STATIONS

Delivery Meter – Consumers Energy Delivery Meter – Vector Delivery Meter – Michigan Consolidated Delivery Meter – Union Gas at Dawn

FERC Pre-Filing Review Process

As a proposed interstate natural gas transmission system, ET Rover will be filing a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for authorization approving the use of the FERC Pre-Filing Review Process for the Rover Pipeline Project. The Pre-Filing Review Process will initiate the FERC’s review of the project in order to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). As part of the FERC Pre-Filing Review Process, the FERC, with input from cooperating agencies and other stakeholders, will analyze environmental impacts, alternatives, and mitigation measures as a prelude to submittal of ET Rover’s application and the development of the FERC’s Environmental Impact Statement for the Project.

In addition to facilitating preparation of the NEPA documentation for the Project, the Pre-Filing Review Process will also facilitate compilation of technically consistent reports, exhibits and other documentation to support consultation requests and applications to federal and state resource management agencies for clearances, approvals, and permits.

ET Rover respectfully requests participation by your agency in this Pre-Filing Review Process to collaborate with representatives of ET Rover, the FERC, and other federal and state resource management agencies to identify and timely resolve environmental issues associated with the Rover Pipeline Project June 25, 2014 Page 4 of 4 preliminary configuration of the Project. By agreeing to participate in the Pre-filing Process, your involvement may include, but is not limited to, providing assistance in issue identification and resolution, participation in agency and public information meetings, and examination of Project alternatives.

At the conclusion of the FERC Pre-Filing Review Process, ET Rover will apply to the FERC under Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity authorizing the construction and operation of the new pipeline system.

Communication Channels

ET Rover has retained TRC to provide support for the biological and cultural resources surveys, and coordination of all required federal and state permit applications and clearances. We will be contacting you in the near future to provide additional details on the Project, confirm agency contact information, and discuss specific permitting and/or consultation requirements. It is our intent to schedule meetings with agencies to further describe the Project and receive comments and advice on agency procedures and schedule.

If you have questions, please contact me at 713-989-2844 ([email protected]) or, alternatively, Patricia Patterson at TRC at 978-656-3540 ([email protected]).

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

HANCOCK Mainline - Leesville CRAWFORD Richland Plant to Midwest Hub County CS ") WAYNE ASHLAND USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Wayne County CS STARK ") USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL Hillman Plant to Leesville Lake Leesville Plant Wildlife Area Carroll County CS ") TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington Cadiz Plant to Leesville Plant Harrison County CS ") HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Marshall County CS Clarington to ") Cadiz Plant Majorsville Monroe Lateral Noble County CS ") MARSHALL County CS") NOBLE Seneca to Clarington MONROE Sherwood to Clarington WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Doddridge County CS ") DODDRIDGE

") Compressor Stations Cadiz Plant to Leesville Plant USACE Districts Sherwood to Clarington Hillman Plant to Leesville Plant Protected Lands Owner Type ² Seneca to Clarington Mainline - Leesville Plant to Midwest Hub Federal Majorsville Lateral Midwest Hub to the International Border State ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT 01020 Clarington to Cadiz Plant International Border to Dawn Local Government Miles PIPELINE SEGMENTS Private and Other IN WV, PA, OH, MI AND CANADA

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 DATE: JUNE 2014 Horseshoe Lake State Game Area Holly State Recreation Area International Border to Dawn MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

WASHTENAW

USACE District Midwest Hub to the Detroit International Border

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance County CS Mainline - Leesville Plant ") to Midwest Hub DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

USACE District Louisville Seneca County CS ") SENECA HANCOCK

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 DATE: JUNE 2014 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Update Letter August 26, 2014

FEDERAL

Ginger Mullins Chief, Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District 502 Eighth Street Huntington, WV 25701-2070

Scott Hans Chief, Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District 1000 Liberty Avenue, Suite 2200 Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Diane C. Kozlowski Chief, Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District 1776 Niagara Street Buffalo, NY 14207

Tinka Hyde Division Director, Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 (OH, MI) 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604

Gary Jensen, Team Leader U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration National Scenic Byways Program 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Lora Zimmerman, Project Leader/Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Pennsylvania Ecological Services Field Office 315 South Allen Street, Suite 322 State College, PA 16801

Scott Hicks, Field Office Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service East Lansing Ecological Services Field Office 2651 Coolidge Road East Lansing, MI 48823

1 of 4 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Update Letter August 26, 2014

WEST VIRGINIA

Scott G. Mandirola, Division Director Division of Water and Waste Management West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304

Director, Office of Land and Streams West Virginia Division of Natural Resources 324 Fourth Avenue South Charleston, WV 25303

PENNSYLVANIA

Sue Malone, Regional Director Southwest (Pittsburgh) Regional Office Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 400 Waterfront Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Lauren Imgrund, Director Bureau of Recreation and Conservation Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17105-8552

Director, Division of Environmental Services Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission 450 Robson Lane Bellefonte, PA 16823-7437

William A. Capouillez, Director Bureau of Wildlife Habitat Management Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) 2001 Elmerton Avenue, Harrisburgh, PA 17110-9797

OHIO

Craig W. Butler, Director Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43216-1049

2 of 4 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Update Letter August 26, 2014

Carl Gebhardt, Division Chief Division of Surface Water Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43216-1049

Rachel Taulbee, Supervisor Division of Air Pollution Control Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43216-1049

Director, Division of Wildlife Ohio Department of Natural Resources 2045 Morse Road Columbus, OH 43229-6693

Mark J. Epstein Department Head, Resource Protection and Review State Historic Preservation Office 800 E. 17th Avenue Columbus, OH 43211

Todd Schaffer, Operations Stark County Park District 5300 Tyner Street, NW Canton, OH 44708

John M. Hoopingarner, Executive Director/Secretary Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District 1319 3rd Street, NW New Philadelphia, OH 44663

MICHIGAN

Mary Vanderlaan, District Coordinator Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Lansing District Office Water Resources Division 525 West Allegan Street (Constitution Hall) Lansing, MI 48909-7742

Jon Russell, District Coordinator Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Jackson District Office Water Resources Division 301 East Louis Glick Highway Jackson, MI 49101-1556

3 of 4 Rover Pipeline Project Agency Project Update Letter August 26, 2014

Andy Hartz, District Coordinator Water Resources Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Southeast Michigan District Office 27700 Donald Court Warren, MI 48092—2793

Keith Creagh, Director Michigan Department of Natural Resources 525 West Allegan Street, PO Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909

Martha MacFarlane-Faes Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Michigan State Housing Development Authority Historic Preservation 702 W. Kalamazoo St., P.O. Box 30740 Lansing, MI 48909-8240

4 of 4 August 26, 2014

[Name Agency Street City, State, Zip ]

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Project Update

Dear Sir or Madam:

On June 25, 2014, ET Rover Pipeline LLC (ET Rover) provided you with information on its proposed Rover Pipeline Project (Project), a new interstate natural gas transmission pipeline extending for approximately 600 miles through parts of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, and ultimately into Ontario, Canada. The Project originated as a result of discussions with producers in the Marcellus and Utica Shale areas of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio desiring to move their production to markets in the Midwest and Canada.

As a result of ongoing discussions with producers and ongoing field surveys, the Project has been modified as follows:

Project will provide transportation of 3.25 billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day of natural gas. ET Rover has now executed precedent agreements with shippers representing 3.1 Bcf/d and fully expects to contract the remaining capacity prior to in-service or as interruptible flows after initial start-up. Two new laterals have been added: o Sherwood to CGT (Columbia Gulf Transmission) Lateral – 5.4 miles in Doddridge County, West Virginia; and o Berne Lateral – 4.1 miles in Noble and Monroe counties, Ohio. Mainline has been expanded so that it will consist of approximately 208 miles of two 42- inch-diameter pipelines extending from the vicinity of Cadiz in Harrison County to Defiance in Defiance County, Ohio.

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 3

The northern part of the Market Segment route has been shifted further north and now crosses through Shiawassee, Genesee, and Lapeer counties, Michigan.

The Project facilities as currently proposed will consist of approximately 608.3 miles consisting of seven Supply Laterals and two Mainlines, 10 compressor stations with a total of 246,900 horsepower, and associated meter stations and aboveground facilities. These facilities are detailed below and shown on the attached General Location Map.

The in-service date of December 2016 will include the following pipeline and compressor station facilities between the supply areas in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia to the Midwest Hub in Defiance, Ohio. Receipt meter stations will be located on each of the Supply Laterals.

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Supply Laterals Sherwood Lateral 36-inch 53.4 WV, OH Sherwood to CGT Lateral 24-inch 5.4 WV Seneca Lateral 42-inch 26.0 OH Berne Lateral 24-inch 4.1 OH Clarington Lateral 42-inch 33.0 OH Majorsville Lateral 26-inch 23.5 WV, OH Hillman Lateral 36-inch 46.9 PA, WV, OH Mainline (Cadiz to Defiance) 2 – 42-inch 208.0 OH Total Miles:400.3

Compressor Stations Horsepower State Supply Laterals: Sherwood Compressor Station 15,000 WV Seneca Compressor Station 22,300 OH Clarington Compressor Station 10,100 OH Majorsville Compressor Station 8,600 WV Cadiz Compressor Station 19,400 OH Hillman Compressor Station 6,500 PA Total horsepower: 81,900 Mainline: Mainline Compressor Station 1 58,100 OH Mainline Compressor Station 2 40,000 OH Mainline Compressor Station 3 41,000 OH Total horsepower: 139,100 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 3 of 3

The in-service date of June 2017 will include the following project facilities between the Midwest Hub to the Union Gas Dawn Hub, Ontario, Canada. Two delivery meter stations with interconnections with PEPL and ANR will be located at the Defiance Compressor Station. Two delivery meter stations with interconnections with Consumers Energy and Michigan Consolidated Delivery will be located in Washtenaw and Shiawassee counties, Michigan, respectively.

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Market Segment (Defiance to Border) 42-inch 208.0 OH, MI

Compressor Station Horsepower State Defiance Compressor Station 25,900 OH

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or need additional information at 713- 989-2844 ([email protected]) or, alternatively, Patricia Patterson at TRC at 978-656-3540 ([email protected]).

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Sherwood CS "(! ) Sherwood to CGT MS DODDRIDGE (! Meter Station (MS) Sherwood to CGT Lateral Majorsville Lateral USACE Districts )" Compressor Station (CS) Sherwood Lateral Hillman Lateral Protected Lands Owner Type ² Berne Lateral Mainline Federal Seneca Lateral Market Segment State ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT 01020 Clarington Lateral Local Government Miles PIPELINE FACILITIES Private and Other IN WV, PA, OH, AND MI

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 FEDERAL Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 12:33 PM To: Patterson, Patricia Subject: FW: ET Rover Pipeline Attachments: TA-0664.pdf; Draft Portal Protocol June 2011.pdf; IBSurveyorsApril2014.pdf; Phase I Cave.pdf; WVFO_FAQs.pdf; WVFO_IBCP.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Lennon, Tiernan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 12:08 PM To: Thomason, Buffy Subject: ET Rover Pipeline

-- Tiernan Lennon Fish and Wildlife Biologist West Virginia Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 694 Beverly Pike Elkins, WV 26241 304-636-6586 Ext. 12 Fax: 304-636-7824 [email protected] Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

West Virginia Field Office (WVFO) Frequently Asked Questions

Bats:

What is an Indiana bat buffer zone?

An Indiana bat buffer zone is an area of known bat use – an area where completed survey efforts have demonstrated federally listed bat species are present.

Known Indiana bat habitat includes habitat located 1) within 5 miles of an Indiana bat female (reproductive or non- reproductive) or juvenile capture record without an identified maternity roost tree; 2) within 2.5 miles of an Indiana bat maternity roost or male bachelor colony record; 3) within 5 miles of a priority 3 or 4 Indiana bat hibernaculum; and 4) within 10 miles of a priority 1 or 2 Indiana bat hibernaculum.

What is suitable Indiana bat habitat?

Suitable habitat consists of: a. roosting habitat- live, dead, or dying trees with exfoliating bark, split tree trunks, split branches, holes, cracks, crevices, or hollow trunks or branches b. foraging habitat- within and on the edges of wooded areas. Frequently associated with streams, floodplain forests, forested wetlands, and impounded water bodies c. travel corridors- areas that link roosting and foraging habitat, including open-understory forest, wooded fence-rows, and open paths through wooded areas, including streams, trails, and small roads with canopy cover. d. hibernacula- caves or underground mines. e. swarming habitat – suitable roosting and foraging habitat and travel corridors within 10 miles of a priority 1 or 2 Indiana bat hibernaculum or within 5 miles of a priority 3 or 4 Indiana bat hibernaculum.

How many acres can I clear before needing Indiana bat surveys?

Currently in West Virginia, projects clearing less than 17 acres of forest that are OUTSIDE of known Indiana bat buffer zones do not need surveys. Projects with greater than 17 acres of forest will need to complete an Indiana Bat Conservation Plan or perform summer mist netting or acoustic surveys.

When can I clear trees?

If your project is clearing less than 17 acres of forest and is outside a known Indiana bat buffer zone, and no other threatened or endangered species are potentially present, forest can be cleared at any time.

If your project is outside of a known Indiana bat buffer zone and proposes to clear greater than 17 acres of trees then your project may clear seasonally (between November 15 and March 31) after an Indiana bat Conservation Plan has been developed and approved, or do summer mist netting or acoustic surveys to determine presence/absence of bats. If survey efforts demonstrate that federally listed bats are present at the project site, the site must be cleared seasonally and an Indiana Bat Conservation Plan must be followed. If survey efforts demonstrate that federally listed bats are not likely to be present at the project site then the project may be cleared at any time of year.

If your project is within a known Indiana bat buffer zone, then an Indiana bat Conservation Plan must be developed and approved. In addition, the project must be cleared seasonally no matter how much clearing is occurring.

What happens if I am in an Indiana bat buffer and need to clear trees?

Projects occurring within known Indiana bat buffer zones that propose to clear suitable bat habitat will need to devise an Indiana Bat Conservation plan that outlines how the project will avoid, minimize, and mitigate for impacts to bat habitat. Additionally, the project proponent will need to clear the habitat seasonally (between November 15 and March 31) when bats are not present on the landscape.

If implementation of a Plan is not sufficient to avoid potential adverse effects, incidental take would be exempted or authorized only via the issuance of biological opinions pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA, or incidental take permits pursuant to Section 10 of the ESA.

What happens if I catch an endangered bat?

The WVFO and the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources should be notified within 48 hours of capture. The applicant and Federal Action Agency would then consult with the Service to determine what measures could be implemented to avoid adversely affecting Indiana bats. If adverse effects could not be avoided, or minimized so that they are insignificant or discountable, formal consultation with the Service would be required.

Do surveys for bats need approval from your office?

Yes. Please send in your survey plan proposal. When we concur with the proposal, you may continue. A report will need to be sent to our office following survey efforts for concurrence, as well.

How do I do a cave/mine portal survey?

This is both a desktop analysis AND an on-site assessment.

Further details can be found in these documents: Phase I Cave/Mine Portal Survey Data Sheet & Draft Protocol for Assessing Abandoned Mines/Caves for Bat Use

Important points to consider regarding bats:

Some important points to keep in mind when addressing section 7 consultation for Indiana bats are:

1. Clearing suitable habitat during the winter may not always avoid adverse effects. 2. A negative mist-net survey (no Indiana bats captured) may not always indicate that adverse effects to Indiana bats would be avoided if trees are removed during the summer.

3. Surveys and seasonal clearing have specific seasonal windows in which they can be conducted. Being conscious of these windows will help avoid unnecessary delays in the consultation process. Some important windows include:

Summer mist-netting season: June 1 to August 15

Summer acoustic survey season: May 15 to August 15

Winter clearing of summer habitat: November 15 to March 31

Winter clearing of habitat within known use areas: November 15 to March 31

The preceding discussion is not intended to incorporate all conceivable scenarios that may arise during section 7(a)(2) consultation for the Indiana bat. It is presented to offer general technical assistance to Federal Action Agencies, applicants, and their consultants. Some situations may require alternative procedures to fully and adequately evaluate all effects of the Federal Action. In all cases, the Service will use the best available scientific and commercial data to come to its conclusions. In instances where data are not available, the Service will heed its Congressional Mandate to give the benefit-of-the-doubt to listed species. Following the procedures outlined in this document does not constitute consultation under section 7(a)(2) of the ESA. Consultation must occur through direct contact with the Service.

Other questions:

What do I need to include in my project review request?

A full list of what to include in a project review request can be found here: http://www.fws.gov/westvirginiafieldoffice/projectreview.html

Additionally, if you know ahead of time that your project will be in a known use area for bats (bat buffer zone) then include information that demonstrates how you have avoided and minimized impacts to bat habitat (i.e. detailed habitat assessment, minimizing the area of disturbance, avoidance of roost trees, mitigation for trees that cannot be avoided) and that you will clear seasonally.

If you know your project will be crossing a federally listed mussel stream or will occur in close proximity to a federally listed mussel stream, then include information about how you plan to cross the stream and avoid impacting any mussel habitat. Include a frac-out plan if you plan to cross by HDD or include information on proposed surveys if you’ll be doing a mussel survey. Additionally, provide all erosion and sedimentation BMPs that will be applied to the project to protect sensitive aquatic habitats.

What information on water withdrawals do I need to include?

Please provide the exact location of the proposed withdrawal site and the amount and frequency of the proposed withdrawals. In addition, describe the type of structure you plan to use, information on how the structure interacts with the bank/river bed, information on the type of screening on the intake structure, and at what velocity it will draw in water. Additionally, a statement committing to only withdraw when the WVDEP withdrawal tool ( http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/wateruse/Pages/WaterWithdrawal.aspx ) states that withdrawals are permitted from a specific waterbody.

How long is concurrence good for?

Concurrence is good until a new species is listed or until the proposed project changes. If the project plans have changed or a new species becomes listed, the concurrence will need to be re-evaluated.

Survey results for bats and mussels are considered valid for no more than 5 years (the summer they are completed and the following four summer seasons; for example, if completed in 2014, they would expire in 2019).

What do you mean when you say “whole project” and “no piecemealing”?

The Service reviews whole projects and does not accept project piecemealing. It is important to note that “project” includes all project features, not just the portion of the project prompting the submittal of a permit application (e.g., to WVDEP or the Corps). For example, a residential development would include all features of the development, including all forest or wooded areas to be affected or encroached upon by roads, utility lines, houses, driveways, septic areas, detention basins, stormwater basins, yards, lots, etc. An oil or gas project would include not only the well and well pad, but also the roads, staging areas, impoundments and holding pits, and oil and gas lines associated with the well or well field.

Our office will not provide concurrence on pieces of a project; we concur on a whole and complete project. If a “piece” is added to a project later, the “piece” will have to follow commitments that were made during the original concurrence for the project.

How do you define a linear or non-linear project?

Linear projects are things like waterlines, pipelines, or new road projects. These are projects that have a distinct start and end point.

Non-linear projects are things like well pads, impoundments, etc. Access roads associated with these projects are also considered non-linear as they are a part of the whole project and cannot function without other pieces of the project.

What happens if “take” of a species occurs?

An Office of Law Enforcement Criminal Investigator is collocated in our office and and has duties which include visits to project sites to ensure that project proponents are complying with Federal wildlife laws. Unlawful take of a federally listed endangered or threatened species can result in civil or criminal penalties such as fines of up to $200,000 for an organization and potentially jail time, and forfeiture of vehicles and equipment.

Our office coordinates closely with other Federal and State agencies, as well. These partners do not hesitate to contact our office if they have questions pertaining to projects that may be adversely affecting listed species. In the past, we have also received complaints and information about potential project violations from private citizens, as well. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service West Virginia Field Office

Guidance on Developing and Implementing an Indiana Bat Conservation Plan

Introduction Various land development and land use activities can cause the loss, degradation, and fragmentation of Indiana bat habitat. Significant habitat impacts can result in the death or injury of Indiana bats by significantly impairing behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering. Within its legal authorities under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is often in the position of providing technical assistance to project proponents to assist them in determining if potential adverse effects on Indiana bats are likely to occur and, if so, how they can avoid, minimize, and/or compensate for those adverse effects. In many cases, potential adverse effects can be avoided or greatly reduced by early project planning that incorporates the measures outlined below.

This guidance consolidates and memorializes technical advice currently provided on a project-by- project basis. Frequently, these project-by-project reviews include considerable explanation of Indiana bats needs and responses to habitat. To provide similar context for this document, Appendix A provides summary background information concerning Indiana bats.

Rationale for Plan Development The unauthorized “take” of federally listed species is prohibited pursuant to section 9 of the ESA. “Take” is defined in the ESA as: to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect or attempt to engage in any such conduct. “Harm” is further defined to include significant habitat modifications or degradation that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering. “Harass” is further defined as actions that create the likelihood of injury to listed species to such an extent to significantly disrupt normal behavior patterns which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding or sheltering.

Where there is a risk of take occurring (e.g., due to effects caused by the proposed loss of forest habitat), this guidance details specific measures that can be taken to avoid, minimize, and compensate for potential adverse effects on the Indiana bat, and significantly reduce the likelihood that take will occur. In some cases, application of this guidance may be sufficient to determine that effects on Indiana bats are insignificant or discountable. In other cases, this determination may be met through different or greater measures built into project design. In any instance where project design and Indiana Bat Conservation Plan implementation successfully avoid potential adverse effects on Indiana bats, it would preclude the need for take exemption or authorization, and project proponents would be able to forego the lengthy regulatory process associated with seeking “take” authorization under the ESA.

The development and implementation of an Indiana Bat Conservation Plan does not itself confer incidental take exemption or authorization. Consequently, if implementation of a Plan is not sufficient to avoid potential adverse effects, incidental take would be exempted or authorized only via the issuance of biological opinions pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA, or incidental take permits pursuant to Section 10 of the ESA.

Plan Development and Implementation To avoid or minimize potential adverse effects on Indiana bats, project proponents should develop and implement an Indiana Bat Conservation Plan when a project will affect forests, woodlots, forested fencerows, riparian areas, or trees within areas that are known or potential Indiana bat habitat. Known Indiana bat habitat includes habitat located 1) within 5 miles of an Indiana bat female (reproductive or non- reproductive) or juvenile capture record without an identified maternity roost tree; 2) within 2½ miles of an Indiana bat maternity roost or male bachelor colony record; and 3) within 10 miles of a priority 1 or 2 hibernaculum or 5 miles of a priority 3 or 4 Indiana bat hibernaculum.

Potential Indiana bat habitat includes all suitable foraging and roosting habitats and travel corridors where surveys have not been conducted to determine if bats are present, but presences is being assumed. The Plan should consider the various sources and types of effects on Indiana bats due to project development, and incorporate measures to avoid, minimize, and offset potential effects1. It is important to note that “project” includes all project features, not just the portion of the project prompting the submittal of a permit application (e.g., to WVDEP or the Corps). For example, a residential development would include all features of the development, including all forest or wooded areas to be affected or encroached upon by roads, utility lines, houses, driveways, septic areas, detention basins, stormwater basins, yards, lots, etc. An oil or gas project would include not only the well and well pad, but also the roads, staging areas, impoundments and holding pits, and oil and gas lines associated with the well or well field.

The Indiana Bat Conservation Plan becomes an integral part of the proposed project, and as such, is something the project proponent or applicant commits to implement. The Plan must be incorporated as a required condition in any permits or authorizations issued for the project. Prior to initiation of any project construction, send the Indiana Bat Conservation Plan to the Service for review2. The Service will evaluate the proposed project, along with its Indiana Bat Conservation Plan, to determine whether or not the combined effects of the project and Plan will result in insignificant or discountable effects on the Indiana bat and its habitat, or whether further consultation and

1 This approach is sequential, meaning all reasonable efforts should be taken first to avoid adverse effects on Indiana bats and their habitat. Then, minimization measures should be implemented to the maximum extent practicable. After both avoidance and minimization measures have been fully integrated into project design, include measures to offset or partially offset any remaining adverse effects on Indiana bats and their habitat. 2 Note that ALL tree removal within known Indiana bat habitat – regardless of the amount – is subject to the appropriate seasonal restriction. We recommend that even projects with relatively small-scale forest impacts (e.g., less than seventeen acres) consider developing and implementing an Indiana Bat Conservation Plan, because in doing so, the cumulative forest losses from a multitude of such projects would be reduced. Nevertheless, when total forest impacts are expected to be less than seventeen acres, the associated Indiana Bat Conservation Plan does not require Fish and Wildlife Service review and approval. coordination would be necessary due to continued adverse impacts or the likelihood of take of Indiana bats.

Plan Content Provide a detailed project description and map, including all project features. Include project name and company, area size (acres), acres and location of forest in the project area that would be removed and that would remain undisturbed, timing of forest removal, and any measures proposed to avoid, minimize or mitigate lost forest habitat or permanently protect forest habitat off-site for Indiana bats.

Provide a listing of all avoidance, minimization, and compensation measures that will be implemented, explaining how each measure will be implemented for the particular project. The plan at a minimum must include a description of how impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable and must include seasonal clearing for all trees greater than 5 inches DBH that will be removed. Recommendations of potential conservation measures can be found in Appendix B.

An on-site assessment of the quality and quantity of suitable bat habit present in the vicinity of the project should be performed by qualified biologists with knowledge and experience with Indiana bat habitat requirements, such as those listed in the List of Surveyors Qualified to Conduct Indiana Bat Surveys in West Virginia.. This assessment should include a detailed analysis of potential roost trees that may be affected by the project as well as a description of potential foraging and commuting areas present within the project area. A table for recording potential roost trees is available in Appendix D.

Due to the large amount of tree clearing and overlapping projects occurring across the state of West Virginia, the Service is now requiring that you list past and future projects proposed by your agency/company in the last 5 years that have/will occur inside your buffer area (2-mile buffer from centerpoint of non-linear projects and ¼-mile buffer from centerline of linear projects) of your project. This data will help us to better conserve Indiana bat resources, evaluate cumulative impacts, and better implement recovery efforts for the Indiana bat. A table for recording past/future projects is available in Appendix E.

The number of acres existing within 2-miles from the centerpoint of non-linear projects, and within ¼-mile from the centerline of linear projects should be included. The number of forested acres in this buffer area (either 2-mile area or ¼-mile area) pre- and post-construction should also be included.

Additionally a cave and mine portal search within the vicinity of the project should be performed in accordance with the Phase I Cave/Mine Portal Survey Data Sheet should be completed for each opening found. This data sheet is enclosed and results should be compared against the criteria listed in the Draft Protocol for Assessing Abandoned Mines/Caves for Bat Use

A summary sheet of all of this information is included on the following page. This summary sheet should be included at the beginning of your submitted Indiana Bat Conservation Plan. Appendices A through F provide additional information and forms to aid in your submittal of your Indiana Bat Conservation Plan.

If you have further questions that have not been addressed within this document or its appendices, please check our Frequently Asked Questions document at the following link: http://www.fws.gov/westvirginiafieldoffice/PDF/WVFO_FAQs.pdf

If your question was not answered through any of these methods, please contact our office at 304- 636-6586.

Indiana Bat Summary Sheet for Option 1: Assumption of Presence

Project Name: ______

Project Location: ______

County: ______

Project type: linear / non-linear

(2-mile buffer from centerpoint for non-linear; ¼-mile buffer around centerline for linear)

# acres within Limits-of-Disturbance (LOD): ______

# acres forest in LOD prior to project construction: ______

# acres forest in LOD following to project construction: ______

Total # acres in buffer area: ______(2-mile buffer from centerpoint for non-linear; ¼-mile buffer around centerline for linear) (2-mile buffer area is always 8,042 acres for non-linear projects)

# forested acres in buffer area prior to project construction: ______

# forested acres in buffer area after project construction: ______

Caves/mine portal presence? Yes / No

If yes, suitable habitat? Yes / No

# Potential Primary Roost Trees within clearing limits: ______

# Potential Primary Roost Trees to be avoided: ______

# Potential Secondary Roost Trees within clearing limits: ______

# Potential Secondary Roost Trees to be avoided: ______

Avoidance and Minimization Measures to be Applied on Project

Seasonal tree clearing (all trees greater than 5” DBH) REQUIRED Avoid cutting potential roost trees Minimize limits of disturbance (narrowed LOD or ROW) Minimize impacts (clearing) around suitable swarming and summer habitat and wetland/riparian zones 50-foot or greater forested buffer left along both sides of streams Collocate project features with previously disturbed or cleared areas Phase tree clearing over multiple years Reforest disturbed areas Restore or enhanced riparian/wetland areas Strong erosion and sedimentation best management practices Pollution control plan in place Suitable habitat acreage permanently preserved within or adjacent to the project site Other:______ Other:______ Other:______ Other:______

Mitigation Measures to be Applied on Project

Girdling trees on a 1:1 ratio for each potential roost tree that is lost during project development Erecting bat boxes, artificial bark, or other artificial roosting structures A 2-year minimum monitoring plan of artificial structures Preservation of suitable Indiana bat habitat off-site Creation of watering areas, wetlands, or ponds Other:______ Other:______ Other:______

APPENDIX A Indiana bat – Background and Overview

The Indiana bat is listed as “endangered” under the federal Endangered Species Act. It is a migratory species that hibernates in caves and mines during the winter. During the summer months, Indiana bats use a variety of forest habitats for foraging, roosting, and raising their young. Summer habitat may range from a few miles to over 300 miles from their hibernacula. Potential summer habitat occurs throughout West Virginia, while winter habitat coincides with geographic areas having natural cave systems, abandoned coal mines, or abandoned limestone mines. Both males and females return to hibernacula in late summer or early fall to mate and store up fat reserves for hibernation, during which time they forage and roost in forest habitat near their hibernacula (swarming habitat). By mid- November, male and female Indiana bats have entered hibernation. They typically emerge in April, at which time they again migrate to summer habitat.

Reproductive females form maternity colonies (typically of 50-100 bats) and give birth to a single offspring annually. Their colonial roosting behavior is thought to provide thermoregulatory benefits that increase survival and reproductive success. Males and non-reproductive females may remain solitary during the summer or may also form colonies. Summering Indiana bats (males and females) roost in trees in riparian, bottomland, and upland forests, and they forage in the same types of habitat. Maternity roost trees generally have exfoliating bark which allows the bats to roost between the bark and bole of the tree. Cavities and crevices in trees also may be used for roosting.

The primary threats to Indiana bats in West Virginia are white-nose syndrome, and habitat losses due to a wide variety of land development and land use practices that remove forest. White-nose syndrome is causing significant mortality at numerous bat hibernacula, with Indiana bat mortality rates exceeding 60%. At the same time, forest habitat losses occur due to coal mining, wind power development, oil and gas development, commercial and residential development, and various forestry practices.

Forest habitat loss is of particular concern when it occurs in occupied swarming or summer habitat, because bats may be killed or injured when trees are felled. Habitat loss may also have adverse effects on Indiana bats even when they are not present at the time of tree removal. Indiana bats depend on swarming habitat in the vicinity of their hibernacula for foraging and roosting. The presence of these forests and their insect populations is essential to ensuring Indiana bats store up sufficient fat reserves before entering hibernation, so they are able to survive until the spring migration.

Indiana bats also depend upon and exhibit fidelity to their summer habitat, returning to the same foraging and roosting areas each year. Loss of summer habitat forces all displaced bats (including Indiana bats) to find other suitable habitat, and this may result in reduced survival and reproduction. It is not known how long or how far female Indiana bats will search to find new roosting or foraging habitat if their traditional habitat is lost or degraded. If they are required to search for new habitat in the spring, it is assumed that this effort places additional stress on pregnant females at a time when fat reserves are low or depleted and they are already stressed from the energy demands of migration and pregnancy. It is not known how long it takes for the colony to attain the same level of roosting cohesiveness that it experienced prior to the loss of a primary roost tree, but that roosting cohesiveness is critical to survival and reproductive success. Until the bats from the colony locate another desirable

primary roost tree and reunite, it is likely that individual members of the colony will be subject to increased stress resulting from 1) having to search for a replacement primary roost tree(s); 2) having to roost in alternate trees that are less effective in meeting thermoregulatory needs; and 3) having to roost singly, rather than together, which decreases the likelihood of meeting thermoregulatory needs, thereby reducing reproductive success.

APPENDIX B . Recommendations for Avoidance and Minimization Measures

All projects must include seasonal clearing

Avoid impacts to potential roost trees (e.g., avoid cutting these trees). To minimize impacts on foraging and roosting Indiana bats, avoid or minimize impacts on forests, woodlands, and forested fence rows. Configure projects to avoid and/or minimize impacts on suitable summer and swarming habitat, particularly in and around wetlands and riparian areas. Minimize the right-of-way (ROW) by narrowing or rerouting the ROW around high quality Indiana bat summer habitat. Retain at least a 50-foot forested buffer (but preferably a 100-150 foot buffer) on each side of streams and around wetlands. Co-locate project features (e.g., roads and utility lines) and cluster project features (e.g., houses) to reduce forest clearing. Phase tree clearing over multiple years, if applicable to the project. Indicate the rate at which forest will be cleared, as well as the total duration of this effect (e.g., 5 acres/year for 10 years). Reforest temporarily cleared areas with tree species preferred by Indiana bats, in accordance with Appendix C. Ensure soils are segregated during earth disturbance activities and ensure soils are not compacted, to allow for successful tree establishment. Restore or enhance degraded riparian areas or wetlands by planting native trees and shrubs. Avoid use of invasive, exotic plant species when re-foresting and when stabilizing soils. Develop and implement stringent erosion and sedimentation controls to protect water quality and the Indiana bat prey base in streams and wetlands. Develop and implement a pollution prevention plan with strong erosion and sedimentation best management practices to ensure hazardous materials and storm runoff do not contaminate soils, wetlands, or waterways. Set aside protected suitable habitat within or adjacent to the project area to ensure that undisturbed bat habitat will remain on the landscape.

Recommendations for Mitigation Measures When Impacts are Unavoidable

Girdling trees on a 1:1 ratio for each potential roost tree that is lost during project development Erecting bat boxes, artificial bark, or other artificial roosting structures and monitoring these structures, or combination of structures, for a minimum of two years. Preserve suitable Indiana bat habitat off-site permanently. Create watering areas for bats such as wetlands or ponds.

APPENDIX C. Preferred Tree Species

Planting plans should include at least six of the tree species listed below, one of which must be shagbark hickory. To promote diversity, do not include more than 15 percent of any one tree species in planting plans.

Acer rubrum red maple Acer saccharum sugar maple Carya cordiformis bitternut hickory Carya glabra pignut hickory Carya laciniosa shellbark hickory Carya ovata shagbark hickory Carya tomentosa mockernut hickory Fraxinus americana white ash Fraxinus nigra black ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Platanus occidentalis sycamore Populus deltoides eastern cottonwood Quercus alba white oak Quercus coccinea scarlet oak Quercus prinus chestnut oak Quercus rubra northern red oak Quercus velutina black oak Robinia pseudoacacia black locust Sassafras albidum sassafras Ulmus americana American elm Ulmus rubra slippery elm

APPENDIX D. Potential Roost Tree Information Sheet

Please provide tabular information as shown below along with photos of each tree and a map that shows the location of each tree along the project limits-of-disturbance.

Tree ID# Species DBH Live/Dead Coordinates Avoid/Unavoid (inches)

Potential Roost Tree Information Sheet

Please provide tabular information as shown below along with photos of each tree and a map that shows the location of each tree along the project limits-of-disturbance.

Tree ID# Species DBH Live/Dead Coordinates Avoid/Unavoid (inches)

APPENDIX E. ‡ In the table below list all projects performed by the project proponent§ that have occurred within the 2-mile buffer in the past five years.

Project Type of Year of Project Completed / GPS Tentative Amount of Tree Year of Concurrence Title Project to be Completed Coordinates Clearing

‡ Such as well pads and associated features (access roads, staging areas, tank pads, etc.), pipelines and their associated features (roads, staging areas, etc.), compressor stations, processing facilities, etc. and including projects submitted for the project proponent by other consultants. § Whereby project proponent refers to the current company, its subsidiaries, and any other names the company may have previously been known as.

†† In the table below list all projects** performed by the project proponent that have occurred within the 2-mile buffer in the past five years.

Project Type of Year of Project Completed / GPS Tentative Amount of Tree Year of Concurrence Title Project to be Completed Coordinates Clearing

** Such as well pads and associated features (access roads, staging areas, tank pads, etc.), pipelines and their associated features (roads, staging areas, etc.), compressor stations, processing facilities, etc. and including projects submitted for the project proponent by other consultants. †† Whereby project proponent refers to the current company, its subsidiaries, and any other names the company may have previously been known as.

APPENDIX F. Useful Terminiology

“Known habitat” refers to suitable summer or winter habitat located within 10 miles of a documented priority 1 or 2 hibernacula, within 5 miles of a documented maternity capture record or documented priority 3 or 4 hibernacula, or within 2.5 miles of a documented maternity roost tree.

“Maternity habitat” refers to suitable summer habitat used by juveniles and reproductive (pregnant, lactating, or post-lactating) females.

“Non-maternity habitat” refers to suitable summer habitat used by non-reproductive females and/or males.

“Occupied” refers to suitable habitat that is expected or assumed to be in use by Indiana bats at the time of impact.

“Potential habitat” occurs statewide where suitable roosting, foraging and travel habitat for the Indiana bat exists. Known habitat also includes potential habitat for those currently undocumented uses.

“Suitable habitat” refers to summer and/or winter habitat that is appropriate for use by Indiana bats.

o Suitable winter habitat (hibernacula) is restricted to underground caves and cave- like structures (e.g., abandoned mines, railroad tunnels). These hibernacula typically have a wide range of vertical structures; cool, stable temperatures, preferably between 4°C and 8°C; and humidity levels above 74% but below saturation.

o Suitable summer habitat for Indiana bats consists of the variety of forested/wooded habitats where they roost, forage and travel. This includes forested blocks as well as linear features such as fencerows, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. These wooded areas may be dense or loose aggregates of trees with variable amounts of canopy closure. Isolated trees are considered suitable habitat when they exhibit the characteristics of a suitable roost tree.

“Suitable primary maternity roost tree” Refers to a dead or partially dead tree that is at least 9 inches DBH and has cracks, crevices, and/or loose or exfoliating bark. Trees in excess of 16 inches DBH are considered optimal for maternity colony roosts, but trees in

excess of 9 inches DBH appear to provide suitable maternity roosting habitat. Primary roosts are often found near clearings or edges of woodlands where they receive greater solar radiation, a factor that may be important for reproductive females and their young7. Primary roosts occur in open forest, along the edge of a woodlot, in gaps within a forest, in a copse of dead trees, as part of a wooded fenceline, in grazed woodlands, or in pastures with scattered trees8.

“Suitable roost tree” refers to a tree (live or dead) with a DBH of 5 inches or greater that exhibits any of the following characteristics: exfoliating bark, crevices, or cracks. Indiana bats typically roost under exfoliating bark, and in cavities of dead, dying, and live trees, and in snags (i.e., dead trees or dead portions of live trees).

“Unoccupied” refers to suitable habitat not expected to be in use by Indiana bats at the time of impact.

7 Vonhof, M.J. and R.M.R. Barclay. 1996. Roost-site selection and roosting ecology of forest-dwelling bats in southern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 74:1797-1805. 8 Gardner J.E., J.D. Garner, and J.E. Hofmann. 1991. Summer roost selection and roosting behavior of Myotis soldais (Indiana bat) in Illinois. Unpublished report. Illinois Natural History Survey. Champaign. 56p.

Draft Protocol for Assessing Abandoned Mines/Caves for Bat Use

Updated June 2011

In general, openings can be dismissed from bat surveys when:

1. There is only one horizontal opening, and it is less than 6 inches (15.2 centimeters) in diameter with no or very little air flow;

2. Vertical shafts are < 1 foot (0.3 meters [m]) in diameter;

3. Passage continues < 50 feet (15.2 m) and terminates with no fissures that bats can access;

4. Openings are prone to flooding, collapsed shut and completely sealed, or otherwise are inaccessible to bats; and

5. Openings that have occurred recently (i.e., within the past 12 months) due to creation or subsidence. (Include written documentation verifying this determination).

Additional Notes: Bats can access mines via old open buildings such as fan houses. Foliage and other vegetation in front of a mine opening does not prevent use by bats since they can navigate through foliage. Collapsed entrances with multiple crevices between boulders are accessible by bats and should be sampled. Collapses which are completely sealed with soil are inaccessible to bats.

Sampling Dates, Times and Temperature Criteria

1. Fall sampling must be conducted from Sept 15 - Oct 31;

2. Sampling will start ½ hour before sunset and continue for at least 5 hours;

3. Sampling cannot be completed during heavy rain and thunderstorms;

4. Temperature must be > 50° F (10° C) for the first 2 hours, and remain above 35° F (1.6° C) until midnight;

5. Sampling will be conducted on two evenings. If no captures occur and no bat activity is noted with a bat detector the first night, sampling can be suspended for the site;

6. Talking and the use of lights should be kept to a minimum near the sampling site. There will be no smoking, radios, campfires, running vehicles, citronella candles or other disturbances within 300 feet (91.4 m) of the sampling site; and

7. Local residents and law enforcement agencies should be informed of the scheduled nighttime activities. Equipment

No equipment litter or other debris will be left unattended at the site that could result in the capture or entanglement of any animals. Any equipment stored at the site between sampling sessions must be clearly labeled with contact information.

Harp Trap*: Place in front of opening and block surrounding space with plastic sheeting or bird netting. Traps should be tended at least once per hour. When the catch rate is >25 bats per hour and during inclement weather, traps should be tended continuously to avoid harming bats.

Mist Nets*: 50 denier, 38 mm mesh. Place in front of or around the opening. Nets need to be monitored closely and checked at least once every 20 minutes. At sites with a heavy bat swarm, the net will need to be monitored continuously.

Bat Detector: A bat detector should be on site to monitor bat activity when trapping or netting. Bat passes should be monitored and tallied for at least one hour after 10:00 pm. Bat tallies should be reported along with the time sampled. Report the beginning time and number of bat passes in hour blocks.

Other: In situations where it is too dangerous to approach an entrance, bat detectors and/or night vision/infrared recording devices may be used to monitor bat activity at a site. Bat activity in or around the entrance can be monitored by counting bat passes with the bat detector or night vision video tapes can be made, providing actual counts of bats entering the opening. As with trapping, monitoring should be conducted for 5 hours. Report the beginning time and number of bat passes in hour blocks.

* Due to concerns about the potential for harp trapping and mist netting at caves or portals to exacerbate the spread of white nose syndrome, please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, West Virginia Field Office for the most current recommendations and protocols prior to conducting these activities.

Phase I Cave/Mine Portal Assessment Data Sheet

Location: ______Observers:______Latitude, Longitude:______Date: ______Time:______Temperature (outside): ______

Portal Name or Number Opening (cave, quarry, shaft, or adit) Opening Size: Height x Width (or Diameter) Internal Dimensions: Height x Width Slope (up or down from entrance) Entrance Stable? Direction of Airflow (In or out?) Amount of Airflow (e.g., none, slight, heavy) Air warmer or cooler than outside temp. Humidity Evidence of toxic gases? (Describe) Evidence of collapse? Ceiling Condition Amount of water in opening Evidence of past flooding? Observed length of portal Distance to nearest water source % Canopy Cover at portal entrance Foraging Signs? (e.g., moth wings)

Are any portals suspected or known to be connected? Which ones?

Any observable side passages?

Describe the number and size of any observable rooms or chambers.

Additional comments:

Provide labeled photographs of all caves, portals, and openings assessed.

Entry into abandoned mine portals, quarries, or caves can be extremely dangerous because of the potential for ceiling collapse and presence of toxic gases. Safety or health problems may occur as a result of entering abandoned mines. The USFWS does not authorize or require anyone to enter any potential hibernaculum that is or could be unsafe while implementing surveys. These guidelines do not require any applicant or applicant employee, consultant, lessee, or other such designee to enter into any cave, quarry, or mine portal. Qualified Indiana Bat Surveyors* (February 2014)

URS Corporation BHE Environmental, Inc. Contact: Ryan Leiberher 11733 Chesterdale Road 4507 North Front Street, Suite 200 Cincinnati, OH 45246 Harrisburg, PA 17110 phone: 513-326-1500 phone: 717-635-7901 fax: 513-326-1178 email: [email protected]

Environmental Solutions and Innovations, LLC Vesper Environmental, LLC Contact: Dr. Virgil Brack, Jr. Contact: Michael Cooper 4525 Este Avenue 108 Laurel Street Cincinnati, OH 45232 Hurley, NY 12443 phone: 513-451-1777 phone: 845-594-6718 fax: 513-235-1076 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Apogee Environmental & Archaeological, Inc. Mr. John MacGregor Contact: Joel Beverly 102 Restk Court PO Box 338 Nicolsville, KY 40356 Ermine, KY 41815 phone: 859-885-4363 phone: 606-633-7677 email: [email protected] fax: 606-632-2626 email: [email protected] Biodiversity Research Institute Dr. Karen Campbell Contact: Tim Divoll Biology Department 652 Main Street Albright College Gorham, ME 04038 Reading, PA 19614 phone: 207-887-7160 phone: 610-921-2381 email: [email protected] Eco-Tech, Inc. HDR Environmental, Operations & Construction, Inc. Contact: Lee Droppelman Contact: John Timpone PO Box 8 610 West Hubbard Avenue, Suite 227 Frankfort, KY 40602-0008 Coeur d’Alene, ID 83814 phone: 502-695-8060 phone: 208-665-3984 fax: 502-695-8061 cell: 520-308-8947 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Sanders Environmental, Inc. Dr. Lynn Robbins Contact: Chris Sanders Southwest Missouri State University PO Box 185 Biology Department Centre Hall, PA 16828-0185 901 South National phone: 814-364-8776 Springfield, MO 65804 cell: 814-659-8257 phone: 417-836-5366 email: [email protected] Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. Contact: Ryan Slack Contact: Kevin Murray 1 North Pennsylvania Street, Suite 1100 408 West Sixth Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 Bloomington, IN 47404 phone: 877-746-0749 phone: 812-340-4318 fax: 317-655-7778 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Copperhead Environmental Consulting, Inc. Mr. John Chenger Contact: Mark Gumbert Bat Conservation & Management 11641 Richmond Road; PO Box 73 905 Thornton Drive Paint Lick, KY 40461 Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 phone: 859-925-9012 phone: 717-795-7527 cell: 859-619-6242 email: [email protected] fax: 859-925-9816 email: [email protected] Skybax Ecological Services, LLC Mountain State Biosurveys, LLC Contact: Gary Libby Contact: Keith Johnson 107 Vanwinkle Grove 6703 Ohio River Road Berea, KY 40403 Lesage, WV 25537 phone: 859-302-2897 phone: 304-762-2453 email: [email protected] email: [email protected]

Pittsburgh Wildlife & Environmental, Inc. Contact: Neil Bossart Julie Zeyzus 853 Beagle Club Road PO Box 314 McDonald, PA 15057 Fayetteville, PA 17222 phone: 724-796-5137 phone: 724-387-8201 cell: 717-860-7679 email: [email protected] email: [email protected]

Normandeau Associates Appalachian Technical Services Contact: Mick O’Mahony Contact: Chris Isaac 400 Reading Pike PO Box 3537 Building A, Suite 101 Wise, VA 24293 Stowe, PA 19464 phone: 276-328-4200 phone: 484-945-2631 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Jackson Environmental Consulting Services, LLC Redwing Ecological Services, Inc. Contact: Jeremy Jackson, Shane Prescott Contact: Benjamin Deetsch 114 North 3rd Street, Suite 1 129 S. Sixth Street Richmond, KY 40475 Louisville, KY 40202 phone: 859-623-0499 phone: 502-625-3009 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Davey Resource Group Contact: James Kiser Contact : Jennifer Hickey 1901 Nelson Miller Parkway 3728 Fishcreek Road Louisville, KY 40223-2177 Stow, OH 44224 phone: 502-396-3199 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] AllStar Ecology, LLC Wildlife Specialists, LCL Contact: Sheila Captain Contact: James Hart 1582 Meadowdale Road 2785 Hills Creek Road Fairmont, WV 26554 Wellsboro, PA 17257 phone: 304-816-3490; 866-213-2666 (toll free) phone: 570-376-2255 cell: 734-678-8901 email: [email protected] email: [email protected]

Skelly & Loy, Inc. Alliance Consulting, Inc. Contact: Steve Pernick Contact: Braden Hoffman 3280 William Pitt Way 124 Philpott Lane Pittsburgh, PA 15238 Beaver, WV 25813 phone: 800-340-7538 phone: 304-255-0491 email: [email protected] email: [email protected]

TRC Companies, Inc. Contact: Bradley Steffen 1123 Cornell Park Drive Cincinnati, OH 45242 phone: 513-489-2255 ext. 1045 cell: 513-309-6453 email: [email protected]

* This list includes individuals who are qualified to conduct surveys for Indiana bats, or those who are company contacts, and may not include all individuals qualified to conduct such surveys. Inclusion of names on this list does not constitute endorsement by the WV Division of Natural Resources (WVDNR), the US Fish and Wildlife Service, nor any other government agency. A WV Scientific Collecting Permit will be required from the WVDNR to sample bats in WV. Note that various techniques are used to sample for and study bats, including mist-netting, Anabat detectors, and radio-telemetry. Some individuals on this list may not be qualified to conduct all three techniques. August 26, 2014

John Schmidt, Project Leader U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service West Virginia Ecological Services Field Office 694 Beverly Pike Elkins, WV 26241

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Project Update Reference: TA-0664

Dear Mr. Schmidt:

We thank you for your response dated July 15, 2014 and would like to inform you of the following Project modifications that have resulted from ongoing discussions with producers and ongoing field surveys.

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 3

Mainline has been expanded so that it will consist of approximately 208 miles of two 42- inch-diameter pipelines extending from the vicinity of Cadiz in Harrison County to Defiance in Defiance County, Ohio. The northern part of the Market Segment route has been shifted further north and now crosses through Shiawassee, Genesee, and Lapeer counties, Michigan.

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Market Segment (Defiance to Border) 42-inch 208.0 OH, MI

Compressor Station Horsepower State Defiance Compressor Station 25,900 OH

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 12:16 PM To: 'Shellenberger, Pamela'; Patterson, Patricia; Steffen, Bradley Subject: RE: Undeliverable: ET Rover Pipeline LLC; Rover Pipeline Project; PA USFWS #2014-0882

Hi,Ms.Shellenberger, Weareintheprocessofputtingtogetheranassessmentandwillbecontactingyouwithinthenextcoupleof weekstodiscussit.Pleaseletusknowifyouhavequestionsinthemeantime. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Shellenberger, Pamela [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:51 PM To: Thomason, Buffy; Patterson, Patricia Subject: Fwd: Undeliverable: ET Rover Pipeline LLC; Rover Pipeline Project; PA USFWS #2014-0882

Buffy,

Please provide additional information that describes the amount of suitable forest habitat (in acres) in Pennsylvania that will be impacted for Indiana bats.

Thank you,

Pamela Shellenberger U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 315 South Allen Street State College, PA 16801 814-234-4090 x241 814-234-0748 (f) http://fws.gov/northeast/pafo/index.html

**Due to an imposed hiring freeze and the inability to back fill positions, we are experiencing increased project review times (a minimum of 60 days) and response times to phone calls and emails. Please be patient; we will address projects in the order in which they are received.**

Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

August 26, 2014

Mary Knapp, Ph.D., Field Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Ohio Ecological Services Field Office 4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, OH 43230

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Project Update Reference: TAILS 03EI5000-2014-TA-1504

Dear Dr. Knapp:

We thank you for your response dated July 23, 2014 and would like to inform you of the following Project modifications that have resulted from ongoing discussions with producers and ongoing field surveys.

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 3

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Market Segment (Defiance to Border) 42-inch 208.0 OH, MI

Compressor Station Horsepower State Defiance Compressor Station 25,900 OH

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:57 AM To: Steffen, Bradley Cc: Patterson, Patricia Subject: FW: Rover Pipeline Project - group 2 Attachments: ETC Rover Routes Buffers and Mileposts_08252014.zip

Brad,FYI,IsenttheupdatedfilestoKeithLottatOHFWS. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:52 AM To: 'Lott, Keith' Cc: 'Patricia Patterson' Subject: RE: Rover Pipeline Project - group 2

Absolutely,andsorryIhadn’tgottenthatdonepreviously.Attachedisazipfileoftherevisedroutes.Iam sendingyouallofthem,sincetheyareallatleastpartiallywithinOhio. Pleaseletmeknowifyouneedanythingelse. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Lott, Keith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 8:27 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Subject: Re: Rover Pipeline Project - group 2

Buffy,

I recently received a letter saying that there are revisions to the layout of this project. I was wondering if you could send me updated shapefiles?

Thanks,

Keith

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Thomason, Buffy wrote:

1 Keith,attachedisthemainlinesegmentbetweenLeesvillePlantandtheMidwestHublocationnear Defiance.I’msorryImisseditthefirsttime.Pleaseletmeknowifyouneedanythingelse.

Thankyou,

BuffyThomason

EnergyTransferCompany

O:7139892844,C:9795713113

From: Lott, Keith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 10:15 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Subject: Re: Rover Pipeline Project - group 2

Buffy,

Thank you for the files, that'll make our review considerably easier. The shapefile for the "Mainline to Leesville Plant" section was not included. If you could get that to me I'd appreciate it.

Keith

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Thomason, Buffy wrote:

Okay,thisshouldbethelastofthem.Someoftheshapefileshavemorefilesthanothers,andIhavenoidea why.So,ifyouhaveanyproblems,justletmeknow.

Thankyou,

BuffyThomason

EnergyTransferCompany

O:7139892844,C:9795713113

2 From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:45 AM To: 'Lott, Keith' Subject: RE: Rover Pipeline Project - group 1

I’mgoingtosendthesetoyouintwoemails.I’veincludedthreeofthesegments,andapdftohelpverify whichonesyouhave.The“FINAL”insomeofthetitlesonlymeansthattheywereissuedforcivilsurveyto starton.Theprojectisstillverypreliminaryandtheseareonlydesktoppedroutes.We’reintheprocessof startingcivilsurveyandenvironmentalandculturalsurveysnow.Theenvironmentalsurveysarebaseline habitatstudiesandwetlanddelineations.

BuffyThomason

EnergyTransferCompany

O:7139892844,C:9795713113

From: Lott, Keith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 2:14 PM To: Thomason, Buffy Subject: Rover Pipeline Project

Buffy,

I'll likely be the lead for the USFWS in Ohio regarding this project. I was wondering if you could send me a shapefile of the project so that I can more quickly assess potential impacts or need for surveys.

Thank you and I look forward to working with you in the near future.

Keith

-- Keith Lott

Wildlife Biologist

3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

4625 Morse Road, Suite 104

Columbus, Ohio 43230

Phone: (614) 416-8993 ext. 31

Fax: (614) 416-8994

Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

-- Keith Lott

Wildlife Biologist

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

4625 Morse Road, Suite 104

Columbus, Ohio 43230

Phone: (614) 416-8993 ext. 31

Fax: (614) 416-8994

Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

-- Keith Lott Wildlife Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230

Phone: (614) 416-8993 ext. 31 Fax: (614) 416-8994 Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

Patterson, Patricia

From: Luff, Colette M LRE Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 5:05 PM To: Patterson, Patricia Cc: Buffy Thomason - ET Rover Pipeline LLC ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Rover Pipeline Project - USACE No. LRE-2014-423-12 (UNCLASSIFIED) Attachments: Rover County Traversed 2_2_2015.pdf.pdf

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE

Patricia,

Thank you for confirmation of this project change in Michigan.

With the elimination of the St. Clair River crossing, the Rover Pipeline project site, in Michigan, is now totally within the area of Michigan for which, in 1984, the Corps of Engineer’s Federal Clean Water Act 404 regulatory responsibilities were assumed by the State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). Therefore, at this time, regulatory authorization from the Corps of Engineers‐Detroit District, for the Rover Pipeline project in Michigan, is not required.

We recommend that you continue to coordinate with MDEQ for a determination of State permit requirements.

If you have any questions or need further clarification, don’t hesitate to contact me.

Colette Luff Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers‐Detroit District "USACE ‐ Building Strong" Regulatory Office, Permit Evaluation Eastern Branch Address: 477 Michigan Avenue, 6th Floor; Detroit, MI 48226 Office: 313‐226‐7485 FAX: 313‐226‐6763 Email: [email protected] Website: HYPERLINK "http://www.lre.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx"http://www.lre.usace.army.mi l/Missions/RegulatoryProgramandPermits Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Detroit‐District‐US‐Army‐Corps‐of‐Engineers/144354390916 How are we doing? Let us know by taking our Customer Service Survey: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0

From: Patterson, Patricia [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 12:12 PM To: Luff, Colette M LRE

1 Cc: Thomason, Buffy Subject: [EXTERNAL] Rover Pipeline Project ‐ USACE No. LRE‐2014‐423

Colette… As you are probably aware, Rover has reached an agreement with Vector for Vector to carry Rover’s volumes from an interconnection between Rover/Vector near Howell in Livingston County, Michigan. This effectively eliminates approximately 110 miles of pipeline through a part of Livingston County, and all of Shiawassee, Genesee, Lapeer, Oakland, Macomb, and St. Clair counties. This also eliminates the St. Clair River crossing and the Canadian facilities. See attached map showing the Rover pipeline in Michigan and the interconnection with the Vector pipeline.

I assume this means that you will coordinate directly with the MDEQ Jackson District for pipeline facilities in Lenawee and Washtenaw Counties, and the MDEQ Lansing for pipeline facilities in Livingston County. If not, let me know what we can provide you on behalf of Rover.

Thanks.

Patricia Patterson cid:[email protected] Project Manager Direct: 978‐656‐3540 | Mobile: 603‐566‐2013 Follow us on HYPERLINK "http://www.linkedin.com/company/trc‐companies‐inc"LinkedIn | HYPERLINK "http://twitter.com/TRC_Companies"Twitter | HYPERLINK "http://blog.trcsolutions.com/"Blog | HYPERLINK "http://www.flickr.com/photos/trcsolutions/"Flickr | HYPERLINK "http://www.trcsolutions.com/"www.trcsolutions.com

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE

2 Patterson, Patricia

From: Jones, Richard K -FS Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2014 9:32 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: Patterson, Patricia; Thompson, Thomas H -FS; Goldsmith, Gala -FS; Lowery, Sean -FS; Grasso, Ann -FS Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline - Sherwood to Clarington Lateral Attachments: ETRoverPipeline2.pdf

Buffy…hereisaVicinityMapcreatedbyourGISdepartmentshowingtheproposedrouteofETRoverthroughMonroe CountywithintheProclamationBoundaryofWayneNationalForest.TheproposedroutedoesnotinvolveNational ForestSystemlands(NFS)peryoursubmittedroute…thereforenopermitsfromtheUSForestServicearerequired.If the routechangesanddoesinvolveNFSlands,contactmeassoonaspossiblesowemayprovideyoutherequired applicationsandcoordinationifNFSlandsareproposed. Thankyouforyourcontinuedinformationonthisproject. /s/RichJones RICHARDK.JONESProgramMgr. Lands/Minerals/SpecialUses/Boundary WayneNationalForestR9 6518SR93Pedro,OH45659 PedroOfc:(740)5346579 SOOfc:(740)7530548 Cell:(740)3775165 [email protected] ThiselectronicmessagecontainsinformationgeneratedbytheUSDAsolelyfortheintendedrecipients.Any unauthorizedinterceptionofthismessageortheuseordisclosureoftheinformationitcontainsmayviolatethelawand subjecttheviolatortocivilorcriminalpenalties.Ifyoubelieveyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleasenotifythe senderanddeletetheemailimmediately. From: Thomason, Buffy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 11:53 AM To: Jones, Richard K -FS Cc: 'Patricia Patterson'; Thompson, Thomas H -FS Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline - Sherwood to Clarington Lateral Iamattachingshapefilesfortheproposedroute,theWNFadministrativeboundary,andtheinternalparcel datawehave.Pleaseletmeknowifyouhaveanyproblemsreceivingorviewingthefiles. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Jones, Richard K -FS [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:40 AM To: Thomason, Buffy 1 Cc: 'Patricia Patterson'; Thompson, Thomas H -FS Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline - Sherwood to Clarington Lateral Buffy,pleasesendashapefilethatwouldshowNationalForestownershiporalegaldescriptionoftheproposedroute thatiswithinourvicinity.Thanks. IcannotdefinethegoogleearthmapyouprovidedtobecertainofthislocationinrelatedtoUSAlands. RICHARDK.JONESProgramMgr. Lands/Minerals/SpecialUses/Boundary WayneNationalForestR9 6518SR93Pedro,OH45659 PedroOfc:(740)5346579 SOOfc:(740)7530548 Cell:(740)3775165 [email protected] ThiselectronicmessagecontainsinformationgeneratedbytheUSDAsolelyfortheintendedrecipients.Any unauthorizedinterceptionofthismessageortheuseordisclosureoftheinformationitcontainsmayviolatethelawand subjecttheviolatortocivilorcriminalpenalties.Ifyoubelieveyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleasenotifythe senderanddeletetheemailimmediately. From: Thomason, Buffy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 3:10 PM To: Jones, Richard K -FS Cc: 'Patricia Patterson'; Thompson, Thomas H -FS Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline - Sherwood to Clarington Lateral Mr.Jones,attachedisanupdatedfilewesubmittedtoFERConMonday.Pleaseusethisfiletoverifyany potentialissues.Ionlyhavethekmzfilehandy,butifyou’dprefertheshapefile,pleaseletmeknow. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Jones, Richard K -FS [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 8:45 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: 'Patricia Patterson'; Thompson, Thomas H -FS Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline - Sherwood to Clarington Lateral Buffy,Thankyou….IhavesentthemapsfilestoourGISShopsotheycanproducemapsforme.Hereismycontact information. IfWayneNationalForestlandsareneeded,Iwillbeyourprimarycontactandwillprovideyouinformationregarding permittingprocesses. RICHARDK.JONESProgramMgr. Lands/Minerals/SpecialUses/Boundary WayneNationalForestR9 6518SR93Pedro,OH45659 PedroOfc:(740)5346579 SOOfc:(740)7530548 Cell:(740)3775165 2 [email protected] ThiselectronicmessagecontainsinformationgeneratedbytheUSDAsolelyfortheintendedrecipients.Any unauthorizedinterceptionofthismessageortheuseordisclosureoftheinformationitcontainsmayviolatethelawand subjecttheviolatortocivilorcriminalpenalties.Ifyoubelieveyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleasenotifythe senderanddeletetheemailimmediately. From: Thomason, Buffy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 9:37 AM To: Jones, Richard K -FS Cc: 'Patricia Patterson' Subject: ET Rover Pipeline - Sherwood to Clarington Lateral Mr.Jones,perourconversation,herearetheshapefilesforourSherwoodtoClaringtonlateralthatisproposed togothroughtheboundaryoftheWayneNationalForest.Ourgoalistoavoidanyparcelsyouown,andwe haveavoidedtheoneswehaveidentifiedusingpubliclyavailablesources,butwewouldgreatlyappreciateif youwouldreviewtherouteandtellusifthereisanythingadditionalweneedtoroutearound. Pleaseletmeknowifyouhaveanytroublewiththesefilesorifyouneedanyadditionalinformation. Thankyouforyourhelp, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany 1300MainSt.,Houston,TX77002 Office:7139892844 Cell:9795713113 Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender. Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender. Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

3 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:55 AM To: Patterson, Patricia Subject: FW: New info from ETC Attachments: ETRoverPipelineSherwood.pdf; ETRoverPipelineBerne.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Jones, Richard K -FS [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:01 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: Thompson, Thomas H -FS Subject: FW: New info from ETC Buffy,attachedaretherevisedmapsshowingthelocationoftheNFSlandsnearyourtransmissionline.Therouteas displayeddoesnotoccupyNFSlandoftheWayneNF.IftherouteisalteredoryoufindtheneedtooccupyNFSland pleasecontactmeandwewilladdresstheproposal.Thankyouforyourcontinuedcoordinationonyourproject. RICHARDK.JONESProgramMgr. Lands/Minerals/SpecialUses/Boundary WayneNationalForestR9 6518SR93Pedro,OH45659 PedroOfc:(740)5346579 SOOfc:(740)7530548 Cell:(740)3775165 [email protected] 8/27YouWrote:Mr.JonesandMr.Lowery,wehavemadesomeadjustmentstotheSherwoodLateral pipeline,andhaveaddeda4milelateralnearSummerfieldcalledtheBerneLateral,thatentersthenorthwest corneroftheWayneNationalForestboundary.Thecurrentfilesforbothareattached.Wewouldappreciate ifyouwouldreviewthemtoseeifwe’veavoidedyourtracts. Pleaseletusknowifyouhaveanyquestions. Thankyou, BuffyThomason ThiselectronicmessagecontainsinformationgeneratedbytheUSDAsolelyfortheintendedrecipients.Any unauthorizedinterceptionofthismessageortheuseordisclosureoftheinformationitcontainsmayviolatethelawand subjecttheviolatortocivilorcriminalpenalties.Ifyoubelieveyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleasenotifythe senderanddeletetheemailimmediately.

1 ET Rover Pipeline ¯ Sherwood to Clarington Lateral

Round Bottom !

Laings !

Monroe County

Antioch !

Sardis !

Paden Legend City ! Lateral Route Proclamation_Boundary Counties Wayne National Forest

Wayne National Forest Athens Ranger District Marietta Unit 0120.5 Miles 27 AUG 2014 1:80,000 ET Rover Pipeline Berne Lateral Calais ¯ !

Summerfield !

Monroe County East Union Noble ! County

Carlisle !

Stafford Legend !

Lateral Route Proclamation_Boundary Counties Wayne National Forest

Wayne National Forest Athens Ranger District Marietta Unit 0120.5 Miles 27 AUG 2014 1:80,000 Stoltzfus, Michael

From: Jones, Richard K -FS Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 2:17 PM To: Stoltzfus, Michael Cc: Patterson, Patricia; Thompson, Thomas H -FS Subject: RE: Rover Pipeline Project crossing of the Wayne National Forest Attachments: LRMP NR References.jpg

Mike – I made some comments to your note below and also took an excerpt from the Federal Register that pertains to Land Management Planning (2015) and private property rights.

Richard K. Jones Lands Minerals Program Manager Forest Service Wayne National Forest-Supervisors Office

p: 740-534-6579 c: 740-377-5165 f: 740-534-0620 [email protected] 6518 SR 93 Pedro, OH 45659 www.fs.fed.us

Caring for the land and serving people

From: Stoltzfus, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 1:17 PM To: Jones, Richard K -FS Cc: Patterson, Patricia Subject: Rover Pipeline Project crossing of the Wayne National Forest

Richard,

Thanks for taking the time to return my call last week. I would like to document our conversation so that we may provide this to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission who is currently reviewing the Project. Please confirm or provide further clarification on the information in this email if you find my interpretation/recalling of our conversation to be in error.

Previous correspondence between yourself and Buffy Thomason of Energy Transfer Company in August of 2014 (attached) stated that, based on your review of the proposed route as submitted to you at that time, the Project did not involve National Forest System (NFS) lands and therefore no permits from the US Forest Service are required.

The Project as currently proposed still does not cross National Forest System (NFS) lands but does cross areas located within the Forest Proclamation Boundary of the Wayne National Forest (WNF), as it did in August of 2014. The Sherwood and Berne Laterals are located partially within the administrative boundary of the WNF in Monroe County, Ohio. The Sherwood Lateral crosses the WNF between approximate MPs 36.4 and 36.9, and approximate MPs 39.3 and 46.8. The Berne Lateral crosses through the WNF Boundary between MP 0.0 and 1.74. I’ve attached maps showing the crossing locations for the Project as related to NFS lands of the WNF. ( I recommend changing the color scheme of the private lands within the Forest Boundary to white or yellow—something other than green‐it may be misleading) keeping the 1 National Forest System Lands (NFS) Green is good since that corresponds to what the Forest Service parcels are colored.)

As you described during our phone call, the proclamation boundary defines an area that the State of Ohio has agreed that the U.S. Government may acquire lands within for the purpose of establishing a National Forest. Areas within the proclamation boundary but not on NFS lands are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US Forest Service (USFS) or the management goals, objectives, standards, and guidelines of the USFS as expressed in the 2006 Wayne National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. If a property is acquired by the United States and becomes part of the Wayne National Forest by the Forest Service, it does fall under National Forest management and a Land and Resource Management Plan….but as a private parcel of land not owned by the USA, it is not subject to National Forest Management‐‐‐private property is subject to certain Federal Law such as the ESA Endangered Species Act and CWA Clean Water Act.

Thanks,

Michael L. Stoltzfus, P.W.S. Senior Project Manager

650 Suffolk Street, Wannalancit Mills, Lowell, MA 01854 T: 978.656.3539 | F: 978.453.1995 | C: 978.880.5925

LinkedIn | Twitter | Blog | Flickr | www.trcsolutions.com

This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

2 title http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/

EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the fishery management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive evaluation of EFH at this location. A location-specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links for the appropriate regional resources.

Query Results Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 41º30'37" N, Longitude = 84º57'29" W Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 41.51, Longitude = -83.04

The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and/or HAPCs for the following species/management units.

HAPCs No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report location.

EFH Areas Protected from Fishing No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.

1 of 1 1/7/2015 1:55 PM WEST VIRGINIA August 26, 2014

Fred Durham, Director Division of Air Quality West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Project Update

Dear Mr. Durham:

We thank you for your comments dated August 25, 2014 and would like to inform you of the following Project modifications that have resulted from ongoing discussions with producers and ongoing field surveys.

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 3

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Market Segment (Defiance to Border) 42-inch 208.0 OH, MI

Compressor Station Horsepower State Defiance Compressor Station 25,900 OH

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Zack Lissard Date of Contact: 10/23/2014

Title: PM Phone: 978-656-3661

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Glenn McLernon

Title: In-Lieu Fee Coordinator Phone: 304-926-0499 ext 1715

Company: WVDEP

Reason for Contact

I spoke with Glenn McLernon with the WVDEP about the wetland mitigation options within the state. He stated that West Virginia administers an in-lieu fee program to mitigate for wetland and stream impacts caused by projects, if no mitigation banks are available in the project HUC. The impact calculations or inputted into the West Virginia Stream and Wetland Valuation Metric to determine the mitigation fee.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

Describe items and commitments here if any.

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Kevin O’Brion Date of Contact: 2/9/2015

Title: Environmental Scientist Phone: 978-735-3425

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Wilma Reip

Title: Phone: 304-926-1599

Company: West Virginia DEP – Water and Waste Management

Reason for Contact

Spoke with Wilma Reip regarding vernal pool regulations in West Virginia. They are not regulated separately from wetlands, but rather included as jurisdictional wetlands (regulated under USACE Section 404) or isolated wetlands and are therefore regulated under the State’s 401 WQC.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Patterson, Patricia

From: Lissard, Zachary Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:26 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Patterson, Patricia Subject: FW: Shapefile Request - Environmental Review Request - West Virginia Natural Heritage Program Attachments: Rover_WVa.dbf; Rover_WVa.prj; Rover_WVa.shp; Rover_WVa.shx

Ms. Barbara,

Please find the attached shapefiles of the project alignment.

Thanks,

Zack Lissard 650SuffolkStreet,Lowell,MA01854 T:9786563661|F:9786563616|C:9787701649 FollowusonLinkedInorTwitter|www.trcsolutions.com

From:Patterson,Patricia Sent:Tuesday,September23,20145:24PM To:Lissard,Zachary Subject:RE:ShapefileRequestEnvironmentalReviewRequestWestVirginiaNaturalHeritageProgram AttachedforthoselateralswithpiecesinWV. From:Lissard,Zachary Sent:Tuesday,September23,20144:29PM To:Patterson,Patricia Subject:ShapefileRequestEnvironmentalReviewRequestWestVirginiaNaturalHeritageProgram WV NHP is requesting shapefiles of the project route.

Thanks,

Zack Lissard 650SuffolkStreet,Lowell,MA01854 T:9786563661|F:9786563616|C:9787701649 FollowusonLinkedInorTwitter|www.trcsolutions.com

From:Sargent,BarbaraD[mailto:[email protected]] Sent:Tuesday,September23,201410:23AM

1 To:Lissard,Zachary Subject:RE:EnvironmentalReviewRequestWestVirginiaNaturalHeritageProgram CanyouprovidethepipelineasashaplefilethatcanbeviewedinArcMaporontopographicalmaps? Thanks. Barb Barbara Sargent WVDNR – Wildlife Resources Section Wildlife Diversity Unit PO Box 67 – Ward Road Elkins, WV 26241 304/637-0245 (voice) 304/637-0250 (fax) www.wvdnr.gov “Aprils have never meant much to me, autumns seem that season of beginning, spring.” --Truman Capote

From: Lissard, Zachary [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 3:26 PM To: Sargent, Barbara D Cc: Patterson, Patricia; [email protected] Subject: Environmental Review Request - West Virginia Natural Heritage Program Ms. Sargent,

Please find attached the West Virginia Natural Heritage Program’s Environmental Review Request for the portion of the ET Rover Pipeline Project located within the state of West Virginia.

If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at [email protected] or at 978- 656-3661.

Thanks,

Zack Lissard 650SuffolkStreet,Lowell,MA01854 T:9786563661|F:9786563616|C:9787701649 FollowusonLinkedInorTwitter|www.trcsolutions.com

September 22, 2014

Via Email

Barbara Sargent West Virginia Division of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program P.O. Box 67 Ward Road Elkins, WV 26241

Re: ET Rover Pipeline LLC - Proposed Rover Pipeline Project Natural Heritage Program Environmental Review Request

Dear Ms. Sargent:

A portion, approximately 56.7 miles, of the proposed pipeline will be located within the state of West Virginia. A list of the counties and USGS quadrangle traversed by the Project is attached. On behalf of ET Rover, TRC Environmental Corporation is requesting that your office provide us with a review of potential rare, threatened, and endangered species and unique habitats that may occur within one mile on both sides of the proposed centerline. For your review, please find attached KML files of the proposed centerline and USGS maps (Figure 1) showing the location of the Project in West Virginia.

Thank you for your assistance with this request. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information at 978-656-3661 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

TRC Environmental Corp.

Zack Lissard Project Manager

Cc: Buffy Thomason – ET Rover Pipeline LLC Patricia Patterson - TRC

September 22, 2014 Page 2

Attachments: Figure 1 – General Location Map County and USGS Quadrangle List Shapefiles of the Project Centerline

USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

(! Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS (! WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 County and Quadrangle Information

Counties

Tyler Wetzel Marhsall Doddridge Hancock

USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangles

Majorsville Middlebourne Moundsville Paden City Shirley Smithburg Weirton West Union

August 26, 2014

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Project Update Reference: FR# 14-914-Multi

Dear Ms. Pierce:

We thank you for your comments dated July 23, 2014 and would like to inform you of the following Project modifications that have resulted from ongoing discussions with producers and ongoing field surveys.

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 3

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Market Segment (Defiance to Border) 42-inch 208.0 OH, MI

Compressor Station Horsepower State Defiance Compressor Station 25,900 OH

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 TELEPHONE CONTACT ET Rover Pipeline Project Rover Project

Date of Conversation: 10/2/14 Agency/Organization/Individual Contacted Rover Trail Project Representative Ayla Heinze Fry/ TRC Name / Title: Mitch Blake/Applied Coal Geology Name: Geologist Agency/ West Virginia Geological and Office 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA Organization: Economic Survey Location: 304.594.2331 Phone Phone No.: 978.656.3526 [email protected] No.: Subject of Call: Location of Significant Fossils (West Virginia) Follow-up: Cc: (via email)

Discussion:

Discuss with Mitch ability to determine location of significant fossil findings near the project. He will be able to help (confirmed by email).

TRC Project No. 140119 1 of 1

September 25, 2014

Dear Sir or Madam:

ET Rover Pipeline LLC (ET Rover) is seeking authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to construct and operate a new pipeline system consisting of approximately 810 miles of pipeline, 10 compressor stations and associated meter stations and other above ground facilities located in parts of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan. The Rover Pipeline Project (Project) will extend from the vicinity of New Milton, Doddridge County, West Virginia to the United States /Canada border near East China, St. Clair County, Michigan. An additional 14.5 miles of gas pipeline will extend from the U.S./Canada border to the Union Gas Dawn Hub, in the vicinity of Beaver Meadow, Ontario, Canada.

On behalf of ET Rover, TRC Environmental Corporation is seeking information from state and local land management agencies about other projects (e.g., roads, bridges, mining, large commercial/industrial/ residential developments) that are being proposed within 0.5 mile of the Rover Pipeline Project and in the case of larger projects that require more than 10 acres in land, information about development work within five miles of the Rover Pipeline Project. We are looking for the following information:

1. The project type/name and county; 2. Approximate distance and direction from the Rover Pipeline Project; 3. Description of the development; and 4. Current status and schedule of the development

The information will allow ET Rover to assess the potential for cumulative impacts for the FERC. To assist in your review, please find attached a general location map of the Project and Google files showing the proposed location of the pipeline in your county.

We very much appreciate your assistance in providing this information. You can email me at [email protected], send correspondence via regular mail to my attention at TRC Environmental Corporation, 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA 02154, or call me at 978-656-3662.

Sincerely, TRC Environmental Corporation

H. Jeffrey Brandt Attachments: General Location Map, Google file Patterson, Patricia

From: Walker, Jaime Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 9:24 AM To: Walker, Jaime Subject: FW: WV Water Resource Locations

From: Mitchell, James E [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:44 AM To: McVey, Amy Cc: Toomey, William J Subject: RE: WV Water Resource Locations

Ms. McVey,

I have received your informational request. Under our state code we cannot release locational data for public water wells, springs, or surface intakes. Here is a link to a ArcGIS web service that has Wellhead and Surface Water Protection Areas.

Please note that we are working to revise the protection areas for surface intakes due to recently passed state legislation. Also protection areas do change over time which is why is it helpful to use our web service. Let me know if you need more information. https://oehsportal.wvdhhr.org/arcgis/rest/services/OEHS_Layers/WVSWAPProtectionAreas/MapServer

Thanks,

James Mitchell Jr. GIS Technical Administrator I West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Bureau for Public Health/Office of Environmental Health Services/Environmental Engineering Division/ Source Water Assessment Program GISTA Unit 350 Capitol Street, Room 313, Charleston, WV 25301 Phone ‐ 304‐356‐4315 FAX ‐304‐558‐4322 Email ‐ [email protected] West Virginia Source Water Program http://www.wvdhhr.org/oehs/eed/swap/

Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the individual or entity named above. The message may contain confidential health and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the above‐named recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: McVey, Amy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 7:45 AM To: Mitchell, James E Subject: WV Water Resource Locations

Hi Mr. Mitchell, 1 Just a friendly reminder:

I’m assisting with a project located in West Virginia specifically Doddridge, Tyler, Wetzel, Marshall, and Hancock Counties. I’m looking for information about the following: (1) Public and private water wells and springs (2) Wellhead protection areas (3) Surface water intakes (4) Surface water protection areas

Do you have a list or data file for the locations of the above items for the state/counties that you could send me? This information is important for the nearing submittal deadline

I appreciate your time. Thank you,

Amy McVey Consulting Meteorologist

650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA 01854 T: 978-656-3633 | F: 978-453-1995

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Elizabeth DeCelles Date of Contact: 1/29/2015

Title: Environmental Scientist Phone: 978-656-3578

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Gordon Maupin

Title: Coordinator Phone: (330) 359-5235

Company: The Wilderness Center

Reason for Contact

I spoke briefly with Gordon Maupin with The Wilderness Society and asked if they had any mitigation credits left with the Sugar Creek-Brewster Site ILF Program. He stated that they were completely sold out and suggested we contact Devin Schenk (614-717-2770) with the Dublin, OH the Nature Conservancy on their ILF banking process.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

PENNSYLVANIA Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:15 AM To: 'Starner, Kevin' Cc: 'Squibb, Stephen'; 'Stover, Salyn'; Patterson, Patricia Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline Inquiry Attachments: Hillman Plant to Leesville Plant 07242014.kmz

Attachedisourcurrentlyproposedroutethatweintendtostartsurveyingsoon.Itdoesnottouchthe boundaryoftheHillmanStateParkthatispublicallyavailable.But,pleasetakealookatitandletusknowif wewillimpactanytractswemaynotcurrentlyhaveaccessto.ThisroutewascreatedusingGoogleEarth, anditwillbecivilsurveyedandmaybetweakedalittle.Thenwewillsurveyitwithbiologicaland archeologicalteams. Pleaseletusknowifyouhavequestionsorneedanything. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Starner, Kevin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 8:46 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: Squibb, Stephen; Stover, Salyn Subject: ET Rover Pipeline Inquiry HiBuffy, Perourtelephoneconversation,thePADCNRwouldbeinterestedintakingacloserlookattheportionoftheproposed ETRoverPipelinethatextendsintoWashingtonCounty,PA.TheprojectmappingthatwassubmittedwithyourJune25, 2014FERCPreFilingReviewNotificationLettershowsthepipelineinverycloseproximitytoHillmanStatePark,butat suchalargescale(roughly1”=20miles)itwashardtodeterminetheexactlocationoftheproposedpipeline.Ifyou couldforwardtomeamoredetailedmappingfile(.shporGoogleEarth,whicheveriseasier)ofthisportionofthe pipeline,wecouldbetterassessourinterestintheproject.Thankyou. BestRegards, Kevin KevinJ.Starner,CEP DepartmentofConservation&NaturalResources BureauofRecreationandConservation 5thFloor,400MarketSt,Harrisburg,PA17105 Phone:717.783.4734 Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

1 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:29 PM To: 'Starner, Kevin' Cc: 'Squibb, Stephen'; 'Stover, Salyn'; Patterson, Patricia Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline Inquiry Attachments: Hillman_Lateral_Route_Buffer_and_MP_08202014.kmz

Mr.Starner,we’veupdatedsomeoftheproposedpipelines,andsubmittedrevisedfilestoFERClastweek.I’d liketopassyouourupdatedHillmanLateral,althoughwestillshowittobeoutsideoftheHillmanState Park. Pleaseletusknowifyouseeanyissueswiththeproposedroute.Weareconductingcivilandenvironmental surveysontheroutenow. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:15 AM To: 'Starner, Kevin' Cc: 'Squibb, Stephen'; 'Stover, Salyn'; 'Patricia Patterson' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline Inquiry Attachedisourcurrentlyproposedroutethatweintendtostartsurveyingsoon.Itdoesnottouchthe boundaryoftheHillmanStateParkthatispublicallyavailable.But,pleasetakealookatitandletusknowif wewillimpactanytractswemaynotcurrentlyhaveaccessto.ThisroutewascreatedusingGoogleEarth, anditwillbecivilsurveyedandmaybetweakedalittle.Thenwewillsurveyitwithbiologicaland archeologicalteams. Pleaseletusknowifyouhavequestionsorneedanything. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Starner, Kevin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 8:46 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: Squibb, Stephen; Stover, Salyn Subject: ET Rover Pipeline Inquiry HiBuffy,

1 Perourtelephoneconversation,thePADCNRwouldbeinterestedintakingacloserlookattheportionoftheproposed ETRoverPipelinethatextendsintoWashingtonCounty,PA.TheprojectmappingthatwassubmittedwithyourJune25, 2014FERCPreFilingReviewNotificationLettershowsthepipelineinverycloseproximitytoHillmanStatePark,butat suchalargescale(roughly1”=20miles)itwashardtodeterminetheexactlocationoftheproposedpipeline.Ifyou couldforwardtomeamoredetailedmappingfile(.shporGoogleEarth,whicheveriseasier)ofthisportionofthe pipeline,wecouldbetterassessourinterestintheproject.Thankyou. BestRegards, Kevin KevinJ.Starner,CEP DepartmentofConservation&NaturalResources BureauofRecreationandConservation 5thFloor,400MarketSt,Harrisburg,PA17105 Phone:717.783.4734 Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

September 11, 2014

Via Email

Rebecca Bowen Section Chief Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry, Ecological Services Section 400 Market Street, PO Box 8552 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8552

Re: ET Rover Pipeline LLC - Proposed Rover Pipeline Project Natural Heritage Program Environmental Review Request

Dear Ms. Bowen:

A portion, approximately 6.1 miles, of the proposed pipeline will be located within Washington County, Pennsylvania. On behalf of ET Rover, TRC Environmental Corporation is requesting that your office provide us with a review of potential rare, threatened, and endangered species and unique habitats that may occur within one mile on each side of the proposed centerline. For your review, please find attached shapefiles and KML files of the proposed centerline and USGS maps (Figure 1) showing the location of the Project in Pennsylvania.

Thank you for your assistance with this request. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information at 978-656-3661 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

TRC Environmental Corp.

Zack Lissard Project Manager

September 11, 2014 Page 2

Cc: Buffy Thomason – ET Rover Pipeline LLC Patricia Patterson – TRC

Attachments: A Completed PNDI Environmental Review Receipt Figure 1 – General Location Maps Shapefiles of the Proposed Pipeline Centerline

USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Sherwood CS "(! ) Sherwood to CGT MS DODDRIDGE (! Meter Station (MS) Sherwood to CGT Lateral Majorsville Lateral USACE Districts )" Compressor Station (CS) Sherwood Lateral Hillman Lateral Protected Lands Owner Type ² Berne Lateral Mainline Federal Seneca Lateral Market Segment State ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT 0 10 20 Clarington Lateral Local Government Miles PIPELINE FACILITIES Private and Other IN WV, PA, OH, AND MI Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

USACE District Louisville SENECA (! Meter Station (MS) Sherwood to CGT Lateral Majorsville Lateral USACE Districts )" Compressor Station (CS) Sherwood Lateral Hillman Lateral Protected Lands Owner Type ² Berne Lateral Mainline Federal Seneca Lateral Market Segment State ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT 0 10 20 Clarington Lateral Local Government Miles PIPELINE FACILITIES Private and Other IN WV, PA, OH, AND MI Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 TELEPHONE CONTACT ET Rover Pipeline Project Rover Project

Date of Conversation: 10/1/14, 10/7/14 Agency/Organization/Individual Contacted Rover Trail Project Representative Ayla Heinze Fry/ TRC Name / Title: William Kochanov/Geologist Name: Geologist Agency/ Pennsylvania Department of Office 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA Organization: Natural Resources Location: [email protected] Phone Phone No.: 978.656.3526 717.702.2033 No.: Subject of Call: Location of Significant Fossils (Pennsylvania) Follow-up: Cc: (via email)

Discussion:

Left voicemail for William if PA has records of significant fossil findings on record and he could help determine if there are any areas along the project that have significant paleo findings.

10/7/14: Called William (Bill) about locating significant fossils—will email him information and he will look at it.

10/8/14: Not all of the sedimentary geologic formations you listed contain identifiable fossils. Where fossils occur, majority should be generic variety (primarily invertebrate and/or plant fossils) and do not fall within the realm of unique (remote chance), though possible (E.g. in 2004 a rare amphibian fossil Fedexia strieglei was found near the Pittsburgh airport. A later excavation in the same area found two vertebrae and a well-preserved skull.

Information on Washington County fossils is thin. One reference is:

Hoskins, D.M., Inners, J.D., and Harper, J.A., 1983, Fossil collecting in Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Geological Survey, General Geology Report 40, 215 p. (Washington County, Site 54, is on p. 182- 184)

It is likely that there are other localities; this is just the one that I am aware of.

TRC Project No. 140119 1 of 2 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:33 PM To: '[email protected]' Cc: Patterson, Patricia Subject: ET Rover

Mr.Lucas,IreceivedaforwardedmessagefromyouregardingtheportionofourETRoverpipelineproposed withinPA.I’vealsoreceivedarequestfromaMr.JohnTaucher,andwereceivedacallfromanOfficer Lockley,alsofromthePGC.Mr.Taucherrequestedshapefiles,andIamabouttosendthemtohim.Iwill copyyouontheemailaswell,incaseithelpstoansweryourquestions. Pleaseletmeknowifthereisanythingelsewecangetyoutohelpinyourreviewoftheproject. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany 1300MainSt.,Houston,TX77002 Office:7139892844 Cell:9795713113 Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

1 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:46 PM To: 'Taucher, John' Cc: Patterson, Patricia; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline Attachments: Hillman_Lateral_08202014.prj; Hillman_Lateral_08202014_MP.shp.xml; Hillman_Lateral_ 08202014.shp.xml; Hillman_Lateral_400ft_Buffer_08202014.sbn; Hillman_Lateral_ 400ft_Buffer_08202014.sbx; Hillman_Lateral_400ft_Buffer_08202014.dbf; Hillman_Lateral_400ft_Buffer_08202014.prj; Hillman_Lateral_400ft_Buffer_08202014.shp; Hillman_Lateral_400ft_Buffer_08202014.shp.xml; Hillman_Lateral_400ft_Buffer_ 08202014.shx; Hillman_Lateral_08202014_MP.dbf; Hillman_Lateral_08202014_MP.sbn; Hillman_Lateral_08202014_MP.sbx; Hillman_Lateral_08202014_MP.shx; Hillman_Lateral_ 08202014_MP.shp; Hillman_Lateral_08202014_MP.prj; Hillman_Lateral_08202014.dbf; Hillman_Lateral_08202014.sbn; Hillman_Lateral_08202014.sbx; Hillman_Lateral_ 08202014.shp; Hillman_Lateral_08202014.shx

Itriedtosendyouthefilesinazipfile,buttheemailbouncedbackfromeachofyou.I’mgoingtoassumethat yourfirewallhateszipfilesasoursdoes,soallofthefilesareattachedindividuallynow. Pleaseletmeknowifyougettheseandifyouhaveanyissueswiththem. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 8:43 PM To: 'Taucher, John' Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline Mr.Taucher, AttachedarethecurrentshapefilesfromourHillmanLateral,whichistheonlyportionoftheETRover projectthatextendsintoPennsylvania.Thereisacompressorstationassociatedwiththisline,butIdon’thave thatshapefile.I’mcopyingPatPatterson,andshecansendittous. Pleaseletmeknowifthereisanythingelsewecangetyoutoassistwithyourreview. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Taucher, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 7:35 AM To: Thomason, Buffy 1 Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: ET Rover Pipeline Ms.Thomason, ThePennsylvaniaGameCommission(PGC)receivedaletterdatedAugust26,2014detailingthechangestotheET RoverPipeline.TofacilitatethePGC’sreviewofthisproject,pleaseprovidemewithadetailedmap(orGISshapefiles arepreferred)oftheportionsoftheprojectthatarelocatedinPennsylvania.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,Pleasedonot hesitatetocontactme. Thanks, John Taucher PennsylvaniaGameCommission BureauofWildlifeHabitatManagement DivisionofEnvironmentalPlanning&HabitatProtection 2001ElmertonAvenue Harrisburg,PA17110 7177874250ext.3632 Fax7177876957 Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

ADMINISTRATIVE BUREAUS:

ADMINISTRATION.…………………717-787-5670 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RESOURCES………....717-787-7836 FISCAL MANAGEMENT.……....717-787-7314 CONTRACTS AND Pennsylvania Game Commission PROCUREMENT.……………….717-787-6594 2001 ELMERTON AVENUE LICENSING.……………………...717-787-2084 OFFICE SERVICES.…………….717-787-2116 HARRISBURG, PA 17110-9797 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT.………..717-787-5529 INFORMATION & EDUCATION…...717-787-6286 WILDLIFE PROTECTION.………....717-783-6526 “To manage all wild birds, mammals and their habitats WILDLIFE HABITAT for current and future generations.” MANAGEMENT.…….……………….717-787-6818 REAL ESTATE DIVISION.………717-787-6568 AUTOMATED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES.…………………………...717 Division of Environmental -787-4076

Planning and Habitat www.pgc.state.pa.us Protection 717-783-5957

September 12, 2014 PGC ID Number: 201408290201

Buffy Thomason 1300 Main Street Houston, TX 77002 [email protected]

Re: ET Rover Pipeline LLC – ET Rover Pipeline Large Project PNDI Review Hanover Township, Washington County, PA

Dear Ms. Thomason,

Thank you for submitting your Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) Large Project Environmental Review request. The Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) screened this project for potential impacts to species and resources of concern under PGC responsibility, which includes birds and mammals only.

No Impact Anticipated – PNDI Species PNDI records indicate that no known occurrences of species or resources of concern under PGC jurisdiction occur in the vicinity of the project. Therefore, the above-referenced project is not expected to impact any birds or mammals of concern, and no further PNDI coordination with the PGC is necessary for this project at this time.

Conservation Measure National Wetland Inventory Mapping (NWI) and/or aerial photos suggest that wetlands are located throughout the project area. The PGC is requesting that the final project avoid, or at least minimize to the greatest practical extent, any adverse impacts to these resources and their associated wildlife habitat.

This response represents the most up-to-date summary of the PNDI data files and is valid for two (2) years from the date of this letter. An absence of recorded information does not necessarily imply actual conditions on site. Should project plans change or additional information on listed or proposed species become available, this determination may be reconsidered

Ms. Thomason -2- September 12, 2014

Should the proposed work continue beyond the period covered by this letter, please resubmit the project to the PGC at the following address as an “Update” (including an updated PNDI receipt, project narrative and accurate map): PA Game Commission Bureau of Wildlife Habitat Management Division of Environmental Planning & Habitat Protection 2001 Elmerton Avenue Harrisburg, PA 17110-9797 If the proposed work has not changed and no additional information concerning listed species is found, the project will be cleared for PNDI requirements by the PGC for an additional 2 years.

This finding applies to impacts to birds and mammals only. To complete your review of state and federally-listed threatened and endangered species and species of special concern, please be sure that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, and/or the PA Fish and Boat Commission have been contacted regarding this project as directed by the online PNDI ER Tool found at www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us.

Please be sure to include the above-referenced PGC ID Number on any future correspondence with the PGC regarding this project.

Sincerely,

John Taucher Division of Environmental Planning & Habitat Protection Bureau of Wildlife Habitat Management Phone: 717-787-4250, Extension 3632 Fax: 717-787-6957 E-mail:[email protected]

A PNHP Partner

JWT/jwt cc: H:\OIL&GAS_PNDI_Reviews\Southwest Region

November 4, 2014

Rebecca Bowen Section Chief Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry, Ecological Services Section 400 Market Street, PO Box 8552 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8552

Re: ET Rover Pipeline LLC - Proposed Rover Pipeline Project Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory Additional Review Request

Dear Ms. Bowen:

ET Rover Pipeline LLC (ET Rover) is proposing to construct and operate a new interstate natural gas transmission pipeline system called the Rover Pipeline Project (Project), which will extend for approximately 610 miles through parts of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, and ultimately into Ontario, Canada. The Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) Environmental Review completed for Project stated that we should seek further consult with the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (PDCNR). Figure 1 shows the general location of the Project.

A portion, approximately 6.1 miles, of the proposed pipeline will be located within Washington County, Pennsylvania. On behalf of ET Rover, TRC Environmental Corporation is requesting that your office provide us with a review of potential rare, threatened, and endangered species and unique habitats that may occur within one mile on each side of the proposed centerline. For your review, please find attached completed PNDI Review Receipt and USGS maps (Figure 1) showing the location of the Project in Pennsylvania. We are able to provide you with a KML file of the Project alignment via electronic mail if necessary.

Thank you for your assistance with this request. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information at 978-656-3661 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

TRC Environmental Corp.

Zack Lissard Project Manager

September 11, 2014 Page 2

Cc: Buffy Thomason – ET Rover Pipeline LLC Patricia Patterson – TRC

Attachments: A Completed PNDI Environmental Review Receipt Figure 1 – General Location Maps

USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Sherwood CS "(! ) Sherwood to CGT MS DODDRIDGE (! Meter Station (MS) Sherwood to CGT Lateral Majorsville Lateral USACE Districts )" Compressor Station (CS) Sherwood Lateral Hillman Lateral Protected Lands Owner Type ² Berne Lateral Mainline Federal Seneca Lateral Market Segment State ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT 0 10 20 Clarington Lateral Local Government Miles PIPELINE FACILITIES Private and Other IN WV, PA, OH, AND MI Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

From: Lissard, Zachary Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 2:30 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: PNDI Large Project Review Request - Rover Pipeline Project Attachments: CompressorStation.dbf; CompressorStation.prj; CompressorStation.shp; CompressorStation.shx; Pipeline.dbf; Pipeline.prj; Pipeline.shp; Pipeline.shx; 2014_11_13 _Large_Project_Review_Request.pdf; Rover Pipeline Overview Map 2014-08-26.pdf

Ms. Fisler,

Please find attached the PNDI Large Project Review Form for the Rover Pipeline Project. The original PNDI Project Environmental Review (#20140909466309) was submitted online on September 9, 2014. At the time of the online submittal the Project was anticipated to be below the 10-mile threshold. However, the final Project design will be slightly greater than 10-miles in length. Therefore, we are requesting a Large Project Review at this time. Please review the area within a 1-mile radius of the proposed project centerline.

I have also attached a map of the Project area and shapefiles to aid in your agency’s review.

Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information.

Thanks,

Zack Lissard

650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA 01854 T: 978‐656‐3661| F: 978‐656‐3616 | C: 978‐770‐1649 Follow us on LinkedIn or Twitter | www.trcsolutions.com

BUREAU OF FORESTRY

November 21, 2014 PNDI Number: 22393

Zachary Lissard TRC Companies, Inc. 650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854 Email: [email protected] (hard copy will not follow)

Re: Rover Pipeline Washington County, PA

Dear Mr. Lissard,

Thank you for the submission of the Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) Environmental Review Large Project Number 22393 for review. PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources screened this project for potential impacts to species and resources under DCNR’s responsibility, which includes plants, terrestrial invertebrates, natural communities, and geologic features only.

Potential Impact Anticipated

PNDI records indicate species or resources under DCNR’s jurisdiction are located in the project vicinity. Based on a detailed PNDI review, DCNR determined potential impacts to the following threatened or endangered species or species of special concern.

Scientific Name Common Name PA Current Status PA Proposed Status Meehania cordata Heartleaf Meehania Undetermined Endangered Scirpus pedicellatus Stalked Bulrush Threatened Threatened Trillium nivale Snow Trillium Rare Rare

Survey Request DCNR requests a survey for the following species:

 Meehania cordata (Heartleaf Meehania): documented in a rich rocky streamside floodplain forest; prefers banks and wooded slopes; flowers May – July

 Scirpus pedicellatus (Stalked Bulrush): documented in boggy swamps along a stream; prefers lowland alluvial wetlands and stream valleys; fruits in July

 Trillium nivale (Snow Trillium): documented on a lower slope in a rich maple-hemlock stream valley; prefers wooded stream valleys, often on limestone soils; flowers late March – April

 A survey for the above species should be conducted by a qualified botanist at the appropriate time of year and then submitted to our office for review. Your botanist should carefully review the new DCNR Botanical Survey Protocols available at http://www.gis.dcnr.state.pa.us/hgis-er/Login.aspx. These protocols are recommended to ensure that the all necessary information is collected and that survey reports are prepared properly. It is the expectation of DCNR that these protocols will be followed when conducting surveys for species under our jurisdiction.

 Your botanist should fill out the field survey form while performing their survey: http://www.gis.dcnr.state.pa.us/hgis- er/hgis/2012%20DCNR%20Field%20Survey%20Form.pdf. Contact our office prior to the survey for detailed information about the species, or for a list of qualified surveyors.

conserve sustain enjoy P.O. Box 8552, Harrisburg, PA 17015-8552 717-787-3444 (fax) 717-772-0271

An Equal Opportunity Employer dcnr.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled Paper PNDI Number: 22393

 Any target and non-target state-listed species found during the site visit should be reported to our office. Mitigation measures and monitoring may be requested if species or communities of special concern are found on or adjacent to site.

 If the land type(s) does not exist on site, a survey may not be necessary; please submit a habitat assessment report which describes the current land cover, habitat types, and species found on site.

This response represents the most up-to-date review of the PNDI data files and is valid for two (2) years only. If project plans change or more information on listed or proposed species becomes available, our determination may be reconsidered. Should the proposed work continue beyond the period covered by this letter, please resubmit the project to this agency as an “Update” (including an updated PNDI receipt, project narrative and accurate map). As a reminder, this finding applies to potential impacts under DCNR’s jurisdiction only. Visit the PNHP website for directions on contacting the Commonwealth’s other resource agencies for environmental review.

Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Jason Ryndock, Ecological Information Specialist, by phone (717-705-2822) or via email ([email protected]).

Sincerely,

Rebecca H. Bowen, Section Chief Bureau of Forestry, Ecological Services Section Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program

conserve sustain enjoy

P.O. Box 8552, Harrisburg, PA 17015-8552 717-787-3444 (fax) 717-772-0271

An Equal Opportunity Employer dcnr.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled Paper

August 26, 2014

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Project Update Reference: FR# 14-914-Multi

Dear Ms. Pierce:

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 3

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Market Segment (Defiance to Border) 42-inch 208.0 OH, MI

Compressor Station Horsepower State Defiance Compressor Station 25,900 OH

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014

September 25, 2014

Dear Sir or Madam:

1. The project type/name and county; 2. Approximate distance and direction from the Rover Pipeline Project; 3. Description of the development; and 4. Current status and schedule of the development

Sincerely, TRC Environmental Corporation

H. Jeffrey Brandt Attachments: General Location Map, Google file

Division of Environmental Services Natural Gas Section 450 Robinson Lane Bellefonte, PA 16823

December 2, 2014 IN REPLY REFER TO SIR# 43468

TRC Solutions Zachary Lissard 650 Suffolk Street Lowell , Massachusetts 01854

RE: Species Impact Review (SIR) – Rare, Candidate, Threatened and Endangered Species PNDI Search No. Rover Pipeline Project WASHINGTON County: Hanover Township, Smith Township

Dear Zachary Lissard:

This responds to your inquiry about a Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) Internet Database search “potential conflict” or a threatened and endangered species impact review. These projects are screened for potential conflicts with rare, candidate, threatened or endangered species under Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission jurisdiction (fish, reptiles, amphibians, aquatic invertebrates only) using the Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) database and our own files. These species of special concern are listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Wild Resource Conservation Act, and the Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Code (Chapter 75), or the Wildlife Code.

Except for occasional transient species, rare, candidate, threatened or endangered species under our jurisdiction are not known to exist in the vicinity of the project area. Therefore, no biological assessment or further consultation regarding rare species is needed with the Commission. Should project plans change, or if additional information on listed or proposed species becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered.

This response represents the most up-to-date summary of the PNDI data and our files and is valid for two (2) years from the date of this letter. An absence of recorded species information does not necessarily imply species absence. Our data files and the PNDI system are continuously being updated with species occurrence information. Should project plans change or additional information on listed or proposed species become available, this determination may be reconsidered, and consultation shall be re- initiated. SIR # 43468 Page 2 December 2, 2014

If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact Gary Smith at 814-279-3080 and refer to the SIR # 43468. Thank you for your cooperation and attention to this important matter of species conservation and habitat protection.

Sincerely,

Heather A. Smiles, Chief Natural Gas Section

HAS/GAS/dn

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Zack Lissard Date of Contact: 02/09/2015

Title: Project Manager Phone: 978-656-3661

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Gary Smith

Title: Permit Analyst Phone: 814-279-3080

Company: PFBC – Bureau of Fisheries - Environmental Services

Reason for Contact

I spoke with Mr. Gary Smith about approved pipeline construction methods within Approved Trout Waters in Pennsylvania, specifically Aunt Clara Fork and King’s Creek in Washington County. He stated that pipelines may be constructed via open cut methods in Approved Trout Waters as long as all work is completed outside of March 1 – June 15 timeframe.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

Describe items and commitments here if any.

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

OHIO AGENCY CONTACT

Date: Sept. 9, 2014

Agency: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, OH

Agency Tara Paciorek, Nathan Reardon, John Phone/e-mail: See below Contact(s): Kessler

Joey Mahmoud, ETC, Buffy Thomason, Project ETC, Leon Banta, ETC, Seth Willoughby, Phone/e-mail: See below Representative(s): ETC, Art Arnold

Subject: Meeting

Follow-up: None

Cc: B. Thomason, ET Rover ([email protected]) (via email) P. Patterson, TRC ([email protected])

Discussion:

Meeting was to introduce the project and project team. No concerns identified at this time.

1 of 1 Patterson, Patricia

From: Lissard, Zachary Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 4:25 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Patterson, Patricia; [email protected] Subject: Natural Heritage Data Request - ET Rover Pipeline Attachments: 2014_9_22_OH_NHP Review Request.pdf; 2014_9_22_ET_Rover_Ohio_KML.zip

Dear Sir or Madame,

Please find attached the Ohio Natural Heritage Program’s Database Review Request for the portion of the ET Rover Pipeline Project located within the state of Ohio.

If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at [email protected] or at 978- 656-3661.

Thanks,

Zack Lissard 650SuffolkStreet,Lowell,MA01854 T:9786563661|F:9786563616|C:9787701649 FollowusonLinkedInorTwitter|www.trcsolutions.com

September 22, 2014

Via Email

Greg Schneider Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife Ohio Natural Heritage Program 2045 Morse Road, BLDG. G-3 Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693

Re: ET Rover Pipeline LLC - Proposed Rover Pipeline Project Natural Heritage Program Environmental Review Request

Dear Mr. Schneider:

A portion, approximately 364.7 miles, of the proposed pipeline will be located within the state of Ohio. A list of the counties and USGS quadrangle traversed by the Project is attached. On behalf of ET Rover, TRC Environmental Corporation is requesting that your office provide us with a review of potential rare, threatened, and endangered species and unique habitats that may occur within one mile on each side of the proposed centerline. For your review, please find attached KML files of the proposed centerline and USGS maps (Figure 1) showing the location of the Project in Ohio.

Thank you for your assistance with this request. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information at 978-656-3661 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

TRC Environmental Corp.

Zack Lissard Project Manager

September 22, 2014 Page 2

Cc: Buffy Thomason – ET Rover Pipeline LLC Patricia Patterson - TRC

Attachments: Natural Heritage Data Request Form Figure 1 – General Location Map County and USGS Quadrangle List KML Files of the Project Centerline

NATURAL HERITAGE DATA REQUEST FORM

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE OHIO NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2045 MORSE RD., BLDG. G-3 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43229-6693 PHONE: 614-265-6452; EMAIL: [email protected]

INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete both pages of this form, sign and return it to the address or email address above along with: (1) a brief letter describing your project, and (2) a map detailing the boundaries of your project site. A copy of the pertinent portion of a USGS 7.5 minute topographic map is preferred but other maps are acceptable. Data requests will be competed within approximately 30 days. There is currently no charge for data requests.

WHAT WE PROVIDE: The Natural Heritage Database is the most comprehensive source of information on the location of Ohio's rare species and significant natural features. Records for the following will be provided: plants and animals (state and federal listed species), high quality plant communities, geologic features, breeding animal concentrations and unprotected significant natural areas. We also provide locations for managed areas including federal, state, county, local and non-profit sites, as well as state and national scenic rivers. A minimum one mile radius around the project site will automatically be searched. Because the data is sensitive information, it is our policy to provide only the data needed to complete your project. The information is generally provided without comment on potential impacts to the species and their habitats and therefore does not constitute coordination with ODNR under NEPA, the Fish & Wildlife Coordination Act or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. If your project requires ODNR coordination, please submit it for a more extensive environmental review by contacting John Kessler in the Office of Real Estate at 614-265-6621 or [email protected]

****************************************************************************************************

Date: ______9/22/2014 Company name: ______ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Name of person response letter should be addressed to: Mr. ჱ Ms. ჱx ______Buffy Thomason

Address: ______1300 Main Street

City/State/Zip: ______Houston, Texas 77002

Phone: ______713-989-2844 Fax: ______N/A

E-mail address: [email protected]

Project Name: ______Rover Pipeline Project

Project Number: ______N/A

USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

(! Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS (! WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 Attachment

Counties

Noble Ashland Monroe Richland Belmont Crawford Harrison Seneca Jefferson Hancock Carroll Wood Tuscarawas Henry Stark Defiance Wayne Fulton

USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quads

Alvada Holmesville Amsterdam Hoytville Antioch Jeromesville Archbold Jewett Armstrong Mills Knoxville Ashland South Lewisville Bethesda Lykens Bloomdale Malinta Bloomville Mansfield North Bolivar McClure Bowerston Mineral City Businessburg Morenci Cameron Navarre Chatfield New Pittsburg Crestline New Riegel Deersville New Washington Defiance East North Baltimore Florida Pavonia Flushing Richmond Fostoria Ridgeville Corners Fredricksburg Round Bottom Scio Shelby Shreve Wauseon St. Clairsville Waynesburg Summerfield Weston Tiffin South Wilmont Uhrichsville Woodsfield TELEPHONE CONTACT ET Rover Pipeline Project Rover Project

Date of Conversation: 10/1/14 Agency/Organization/Individual Contacted Rover Trail Project Representative Ayla Heinze Fry/ TRC Name / Title: Frank Fugitt/Geologist Name: Geologist Agency/ Ohio Department of Natural Office 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA Organization: Resources Location: 614.265.6759 Phone Phone No.: 978.656.3526 No.: Subject of Call: Location of Significant Fossils (Ohio) Follow-up: Cc: (via email)

Discussion:

Discuss if Mike could help determine if there are any areas along the pipeline that have significant paleo findings. Discuss the term “significant” in terms of paleontological findings. DNR does not have information on file regarding locations of significant fossil findings. The best he could recommend was the Fossils of Ohio book, and general expected encounters in units.

Emailed on 10/7/14 asking to whom fossil findings should be reported.

TRC Project No. 140119 1 of 1 TELEPHONE CONTACT ET Rover Pipeline Project Rover Project

Date of Conversation: 10/8/14 Agency/Organization/Individual Contacted Rover Trail Project Representative Ayla Heinze Fry/ TRC Name / Title: Stacia Kuceyeski/Outreach Director Name: Geologist Agency/ Ohio Historical Society: Historic Office 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA Organization: Preservation Office Location: 614.297.2474 Phone Phone No.: 978.656.3526 <> No.: Subject of Call: Location of Significant Fossils (Ohio)/Contact if encounter Follow-up: Cc: (via email)

Discussion:

Left voicemail for Stacia—asking if they were the correct people to contact regarding fossil findings in Ohio and inquiring if they had any additional information regarding significant fossil sites.

TRC Project No. 140119 1 of 1 TELEPHONE CONTACT ET Rover Pipeline Project Rover Project

Date of Conversation: 10/9/14 Agency/Organization/Individual Contacted Rover Trail Project Representative David Dyre/Curator of Natural Ayla Heinze Fry/ TRC Name / Title: Name: History Geologist Agency/ Ohio History Connection: Office 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA Organization: Preservation of Natural History Location: 614.298.055 Phone Phone No.: 978.656.3526 No.: Subject of Call: Location of Significant Fossils (Ohio)/Contact if encounter Email David Dyer with information, include Dale Gnidovec (with the Follow-up: Orton Geological Museum at Ohio State University) Cc: (via email)

Discussion:

Talked with David about the correct people to contact regarding fossil findings in Ohio and \additional information regarding significant fossil sites. Fossil findings are not required to be reported unless they are on state or federal land. It is possible that fossils will be encountered. Dale Gnidovec works at the Orton Geological museum at Ohio State University, and has worked with fossils in Ohio for 40 years. Include him in the email to David with information regarding counties and bedrock geology.

TRC Project No. 140119 1 of 1 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:46 AM To: 'Todd Shaffer' Cc: Patterson, Patricia Subject: RE: Rover Pipeline Project Attachments: Rover County Book_Stark County.pdf

Mr.Shaffer,attachedisamapoftheproposedrouteoftheETRoverPipelineinStarkCounty.Pleaseletme knowifitmeetsyourneeds.Wearecurrentlysurveyingthepipeline,soitmaybeadjustedalittlefromthis alignment. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 2:46 PM To: 'Todd Shaffer' Subject: RE: Rover Pipeline Project Isurecan.Wehavealsobeenprovidingelectronicfilesinseveraldifferentformatoptionsifyouwouldprefer that. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Todd Shaffer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 8:54 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Subject: Rover Pipeline Project HelloMs.Thomason, WeareinreceiptofyourletterandmapsfortheproposedETRoverPipelineproject.Couldyouemailbeanenlarged sectionoftheStarkCountyOhiopipelinesowecanseeexactlywhatareas(ifany)willbeimpactedthatwemaintain? Thankyou, ToddShaffer Operations StarkCountyParkDistrict 798GenoaAvenueNW Massillon,OH44646 3304792342 www.starkparks.com

1 Ashland County Planning Department

September 25, 2014

Dear Sir or Madam:

1. The project type/name and county; 2. Approximate distance and direction from the Rover Pipeline Project; 3. Description of the development; and 4. Current status and schedule of the development

Sincerely, TRC Environmental Corporation

H. Jeffrey Brandt Attachments: General Location Map, Google file

Office of Real Estate Paul R. Baldridge, Chief 2045 Morse Road – Bldg. E-2 Columbus, OH 43229 Phone: (614) 265-6649 Fax: (614) 267-4764

November 14, 2014

Zack Lissard TRC Solutions 650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Re: 14-787; ET Rover Pipeline

Project: The proposed project involves a new interstate natural gas transmission pipeline system called the Rover Pipeline Project (Project), which will extend for approximately 610 miles through parts of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, and ultimately into Ontario, Canada.

Location: The project is located in Monroe, Noble, Belmont, Harrison, Tuscarawas, Carroll, Stark, Wayne, Ashland, Richland, Crawford, Seneca, Wood, Henry, Defiance, and Fulton Counties, Ohio.

The Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) has completed a review of the above referenced project. These comments were generated by an inter-disciplinary review within the Department. These comments have been prepared under the authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), the National Environmental Policy Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, Ohio Revised Code and other applicable laws and regulations. These comments are also based on ODNR’s experience as the state natural resource management agency and do not supersede or replace the regulatory authority of any local, state or federal agency nor relieve the applicant of the obligation to comply with any local, state or federal laws or regulations.

Natural Heritage Database: A review of the Natural Heritage Database produced the following comments.

The Natural Heritage Database has data within your project area and provided in the attached shapefiles. The review was based on the project area you specified in your request, and performed using the shapefile you provided to us. It also includes a one-mile radius around your project area. Records searched date from 1980. This data is provided to inform you of features present within your project area. Additional comments on some of the features may be found in pertinent sections below.

Data layers included are for data, sensitive species, managed areas, scenic rivers, and conservation sites. Records included in the data layer may be for rare plants and animals, geologic features, high quality plant communities, and other ecological features. Fields included are scientific and common names, state and federal statuses (when applicable), date of most recent observation, and whether the record is located within a managed area or conservation site. Statuses are defined as: E = state endangered; T = state threatened; P = state potentially threatened; SC = state species of concern; SI = state special interest; A = species recently added to state inventory, status not yet determined; X = presumed extirpated in Ohio; FE = federal endangered, FT = federal threatened, FSC = federal species of concern, and FC = federal candidate species.

There are a few species considered as sensitive for which we do not give out an exact location. They are not within the data layer but are included in the sensitive species data layer which shows a general location.

The managed areas layer shows boundaries for state, federal, county, non-profit, private and sites under other types of ownership that are protected and managed for their natural resources. Please be aware that this layer may not be complete, and we are continually updating it as additional information becomes available to us.

The layer for scenic rivers shows the designated portions of state and national scenic rivers The conservation sites layer shows areas deemed by the Natural Heritage Program to be high quality natural areas not currently under formal protection. They may, for example, harbor one or more rare species, be an outstanding example of a plant community, or have geologically significant features, etc. These sites may be in private ownership and out listing of them does not imply permission for access. Please note that Ohio has not been completely surveyed and we rely on receiving information from many sources. Therefore, a lack of records for any particular area is not a statement that rare species or unique features are absent from that area. Although all types of plant communities have been surveyed, we only maintain records on the highest quality areas.

Fish and Wildlife: The Division of Wildlife (DOW) has the following comments.

The DOW recommends that impacts to streams, wetlands and other water resources be avoided and minimized to the fullest extent possible, and that best management practices be utilized to minimize erosion and sedimentation.

The ODNR Natural Heritage Database has records within one mile of the proposed pipeline for the spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata), a state threatened species. These records can be found within the provided “sensitive_species” shapefile. Much of the pipeline route is within the range of the spotted turtle. This species prefers fens, bogs and marshes, but is also known to inhabit wet prairies, meadows, pond edges, wet woods, and the shallow sluggish waters of small streams and ditches. The DOW recommends that a habitat suitability survey be conducted to determine if suitable spotted turtle habitat is present along the project route. The DOW recommends that the habitat suitability survey be conducted by one of the herpetologists from the provided “Approved Herpetologists” list. If suitable habitat is found to be present along the project route, the DOW recommends that a presence/absence survey be conducted. The results of any habitat suitability survey and any subsequent presence/absence survey can be submitted to Nathan Reardon, DOW Compliance Coordinator, at [email protected].

The ODNR Natural Heritage Database has records within one mile of the proposed pipeline for the eastern hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis), a state endangered species and a federal species of concern. These records can be found within the provided “sensitive_species” shapefile. This long- lived, entirely aquatic salamander inhabits perennial streams with large flat rocks. In-water work in hellbender streams can reduce availability of large cover rocks and can destroy hellbender nests and/or kill adults and juveniles. The contribution of additional sediment to hellbender streams can smother large cover rocks and gravel/cobble substrate (used by juveniles), making them unsuitable for refuge and nesting. Projects that contribute to altered flow regimes (e.g., by increasing areas of impervious surfaces or modifying the floodplain) can also adversely affect hellbender habitat. Therefore, if any in-water work is proposed in Captina Creek in Belmont County, Cross Creek or Yellow Creek in Jefferson County, Sugar Creek in Tuscarawas County, Clear Fork of the Mohican River in Ashland County or Clear Fork of the Mohican River in Richland County, The DOW recommends that a habitat suitability survey be conducted to determine if suitable Eastern hellbender habitat is present at the project site. The DOW recommends that the habitat suitability survey be conducted by one of the herpetologists from the provided “Approved Herpetologists” list. If suitable habitat is found to be present at the project site, the DOW recommends that a presence/absence survey be conducted. The results of any habitat suitability survey and any subsequent presence/absence survey can be submitted to Nathan Reardon, DOW Compliance Coordinator, at [email protected].

The ODNR Natural heritage Database has records within one mile of the proposed pipeline for the barn owl (Tyto alba), a state threatened species. These records can be found within the provided “sensitive_species” shapefile. Impacts to barns, silos and other old and abandoned structures should be avoided to avoid impacts to this species.

The ODNR Natural Heritage Database has records within one mile of the proposed pipeline for the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), a state and federally endangered species. These records can be found within the provided “sensitive_species” shapefile. Because these records have already established presence, additional presence/absence surveys are not warranted to detect probable absence within the capture buffers. The following species of trees have relatively high value as potential Indiana bat roost trees: Shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), Shellbark hickory (Carya laciniosa), Bitternut hickory (Carya cordiformis), Black ash (Fraxinus nigra), Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), White ash (Fraxinus americana), Shingle oak (Quercus imbricaria), Northern red oak (Quercus rubra), Slippery elm (Ulmus rubra), American elm (Ulmus americana), Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), Silver maple (Acer saccharinum), Sassafras (Sassafras albidum), Post oak (Quercus stellata), and White oak (Quercus alba). Indiana bat habitat consists of suitable trees that include dead and dying trees with exfoliating bark, crevices, or cavities in upland areas or riparian corridors and living trees with exfoliating bark, cavities, or hollow areas formed from broken branches or tops. If suitable trees occur within the project area, the Division of Wildlife recommends that these trees be conserved. If suitable habitat occurs on the project area and trees must be cut, the Division of Wildlife recommends cutting occur between October 1 and March 31. If suitable trees must be cut during the summer months, the Division of Wildlife recommends a net survey be conducted between June 1 and August 15, prior to cutting. Net surveys should incorporate either nine net nights per square 0.5 kilometer of project area, or four net nights per kilometer for linear projects. If no tree removal is proposed, the project is not likely to impact this species.

The ODNR Natural Heritage Database has records within one mile of the proposed pipeline for the upland sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda), a state endangered bird. These records can be found within the provided “data” shapefile. Nesting upland sandpipers utilize dry grasslands including native grasslands, seeded grasslands, grazed and ungrazed pasture, hayfields, and grasslands established through the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). If this type of habitat will be impacted, construction should be avoided in this habitat during the species’ nesting period of April 15 to July 31. If this type of habitat will not be impacted, the project is not likely to impact this species.

The ODNR Natural Heritage Database has records within one mile of the proposed pipeline for the western banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus menona), a state endangered fish, the greater redhorse (Moxostoma valenciennesi), a state threatened fish, and the channel darter (Percina copelandi), a state threatened fish. These records can be found within the provided “data” shapefile. In addition, the pipeline route is within the range of the pugnose minnow (Opsopoeodus emiliae), a state endangered fish, the Iowa darter (Etheostoma exile), a state endangered fish, the mountain brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon greeleyi), a state endangered fish, the Northern madtom (Noturus stigmosus), a state endangered fish, the mountain madtom (Noturus eleutherus), a state threatened fish, the lake chubsucker (Erimyzon sucetta), a state threatened fish, and the bigmouth shiner (Notropis dorsalis), a state threatened fish.

Below (Figure 1.) provides the in-water work restrictions and where they apply.

Figure 1. Statewide In-Water Work Restriction Periods and Locations

Location Restricted Period

Percid streams 13/15 - 6/30 Salmonid streams 2 9/15 - 6/30 Other streams 3 4/15 - 6/30

1. Great Miami River (dam south of New Baltimore to mouth), Hocking River (lower section), Little Miami River (lower section), Maumee River (split dam at Mary Jane Thurston State Park and Providence Park in Grand Rapids to mouth), Maumee Bay, Muskingum River (Devola Dam No.2 off S.R. 60 north of Marietta to mouth), Ohio River (entire reach), Portage River (entire reach), Sandusky River (mouth to the first dam), Sandusky Bay, Scioto River (lower section), Toussaint River (entire reach).

2. Arcola Creek (entire reach), Ashtabula River (Hadlock Rd. to mouth), Ashtabula Harbor, Aurora Branch of the Chagrin River (RM 0.38 to mouth), Big Creek ((Grand River drainage basin) Girdled Road to mouth), Chagrin River (Chagrin Falls to mouth), Cold Creek (entire reach), Conneaut Creek (entire reach), Conneaut Harbor, Corporation Creek ((Chagrin River RM 0.27) entire reach), Cowles Creek (entire reach), Ellison Creek ((Grand River drainage basin) entire reach), Euclid Creek (entire reach), Grand River (dam at Harpersfield Covered Bridge Park (just upstream of the S.R. 534 bridge) to mouth), Fairport Harbor, Gulley Brook ((Chagrin River RM 5.54) entire reach), Indian Creek (entire reach), Kellogg Creek ((Grand River drainage basin) entire reach), Mill Creek ((Grand River drainage basin) entire reach), Paine Creek ((Grand River drainage basin) from Paine Falls to mouth), Rocky River (Cedar Point Rd. (East Branch-West Branch confluence) to mouth), Smokey Run ((Conneaut Creek RM 3.5) entire reach), Turkey Creek (entire reach), Vermilion River (dam at Wakeman upstream of the US 20 & SR 60 bridge to mouth), Ward Creek ((Chagrin River RM 1.0) entire reach), Wheeler Creek (entire reach), Whitman Creek (entire reach).

3. Class III Primary Headwater streams (watershed

Note: To determine the defined beneficial use designation for a stream and project segment, refer to: www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/rules/3745_1.aspx#1use.

The ODNR Natural Heritage Database has records within one mile of the proposed pipeline for the clubshell (Pleurobema clava), a state endangered mussel and a federally endangered mussel. These records can be found within the provided “data” shapefile. In addition, the pipeline route is within the range of the Northern riffleshell (Epioblasma torulosa rangiana), a state endangered and federally endangered mussel, the rayed bean (Villosa fabalis), a state endangered and federally endangered mussel, the white catspaw (Epioblasma obliquata perobliqua), a state endangered and federally endangered mussel, the eastern pondmussel (Ligumia nasuta), a state endangered mussel, the purple lilliput (Toxolasma lividus), a state endangered mussel, the threehorn wartyback (Obliquaria reflexa), a state threatened mussel, and the black sandshell (Ligumia recta) a state threatened mussel. This project must not have an impact on freshwater native mussels in the project area. This applies to both listed and non-listed species. Per the Ohio Mussel Survey Protocol (2014), all Group 2, 3, and 4 streams (Appendix A) require a mussel survey. Per the Ohio Mussel Survey Protocol, Group 1 streams (Appendix A) and unlisted streams with a watershed of 10² miles or larger above the point of impact should be assessed using the Reconnaissance Survey for Unionid Mussels (Appendix B) to determine if mussels are present. Mussel surveys may be recommended for these streams as well. This is further explained within the Ohio Mussel Survey Protocol. Therefore, if in- water work is planned in any stream that meets any of the above criteria, the DOW recommends the applicant provide information to indicate no mussel impacts will occur. If this is not possible, the DOW recommends a professional malacologist conduct a mussel survey in the project area. If mussels that cannot be avoided are found in the project area, as a last resort, the DOW recommends a professional malacologist collect and relocate the mussels to suitable and similar habitat upstream of the project site. Mussel surveys and any subsequent mussel relocation should be done in accordance with the Ohio Mussel Survey Protocol. Please submit any mussel assessment/survey to Nathan Reardon, DOW Compliance Coordinator, at [email protected]. The Ohio Mussel Survey Protocol (2014) can be found at: http://wildlife.ohiodnr.gov/portals/wildlife/pdfs/licenses%20&%20permits/OH%20Mussel%20Survey%20 Protocol%20-%20April%202014.pdf.

The ODNR Natural Heritage Database has a record within one mile of the project route for a great blue heron rookery. This record can be found within the provided “data” shapefile. Nesting great blue herons are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. Impacts to great blue heron rookeries can have a significant impact on a local population due to the large number of birds that return each year to the same rookery to nest. Rookeries often include a certain set of characteristics that are not easily found elsewhere. The DOW recommends that construction activity within a rookery be avoided to preserve the rookery. If construction within a rookery cannot be avoided, the DOW recommends at the very least, the rookery be avoided during the nesting season of March 1 through May 31 to avoid interfering with nesting birds. In addition, the DOW recommends a 100 yard no activity buffer be maintained around the rookery during the breeding season as well to avoid interfering with nesting birds.

The pipeline route is within the range of the eastern spadefoot toad (Scaphiopus holbrookii), a state endangered species. The Eastern spadefoot toad is found in areas that provide burrowing and breeding habitat. Burrowing habitat consists of sandy soils that are associated with river valleys. Breeding habitats may include flooded agricultural fields or other water holding depressions. If either of these types of habitat will be impacted within Sandy Township in Tuscarawas County, the DOW recommends that a habitat suitability survey be conducted to determine if suitable Eastern spadefoot habitat is present along the project route. The DOW recommends that the habitat suitability survey be conducted by one of the herpetologists from the provided “Approved Herpetologists” list. If suitable habitat is found to be present along the project route, the DOW recommends that a presence/absence survey be conducted. The results of any habitat suitability survey and any subsequent presence/absence survey can be submitted to Nathan Reardon, DOW Compliance Coordinator, at [email protected].

The pipeline route is within the range of the eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus), a state endangered species and a federal candidate snake species. The Eastern massasauga uses a range of habitats including wet prairies, fens, and other wetlands, as well as drier upland habitat. The DOW recommends that a habitat suitability survey be conducted to determine if suitable Eastern massasauga habitat is present along the project route. The DOW recommends that the habitat suitability survey be conducted by one of the herpetologists from the provided “Approved Herpetologists” list. If suitable habitat is found to be present along the project route, the DOW recommends that a presence/absence survey be conducted. The results of any habitat suitability survey and any subsequent presence/absence survey can be submitted to Nathan Reardon, DOW Compliance Coordinator, at [email protected].

The pipeline route is within the range of the Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii), a state threatened species. This species inhabits marshes, ponds, lakes, streams, wet meadows, and swampy forests. Although essentially aquatic, the Blanding’s turtle will travel over land as it moves from one wetland to the next. The DOW recommends that a habitat suitability survey be conducted to determine if suitable Blanding’s turtle habitat is present along the project route. The DOW recommends that the habitat suitability survey be conducted by one of the herpetologists from the provided “Approved Herpetologists” list. If suitable habitat is found to be present along the project route, the DOW recommends that a presence/absence survey be conducted. The results of any habitat suitability survey and any subsequent presence/absence survey can be submitted to Nathan Reardon, DOW Compliance Coordinator, at [email protected].

The pipeline route is within the range of the blue-spotted salamander (Ambystoma laterale), a state endangered species. Due to the location, this project is not likely to impact this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the black bear (Ursus americanus), a state endangered species. Due to the mobility of this species, this project is not likely to impact this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the American bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus), a state endangered bird. Nesting bitterns prefer large undisturbed wetlands that have scattered small pools amongst dense vegetation. They occasionally occupy bogs, large wet meadows, and dense shrubby swamps. If this type of habitat will be impacted, construction should be avoided in this habitat during the species’ nesting period of May 1 to July 31. If this type of habitat will not be impacted, this project is not likely to impact this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the northern harrier (Circus cyaneus), a state endangered bird. This is a common migrant and winter species. Nesters are much rarer, although they occasionally breed in large marshes and grasslands. Harriers often nest in loose colonies. If this type of habitat will be impacted, construction should be avoided in this habitat during the species’ nesting period of May 15 to August 1. If this habitat will not be impacted, the project is not likely to impact this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the sandhill crane (Grus canadensis), a state endangered species. Sandhill cranes are primarily a wetland-dependent species. On their wintering grounds, they will utilize agricultural fields; however, they roost in shallow, standing water or moist bottomlands. On breeding grounds they require a rather large tract of wet meadow, shallow marsh, or bog for nesting. If grassland, prairie, or wetland habitat will be impacted, construction should be avoided in this habitat during the species’ nesting period of April 1 to September 1. If this habitat will not be impacted, the project is not likely to have an impact on this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the trumpeter swan (Cygnus buccinator), a state endangered bird. Trumpeter swans prefer large marshes and lakes ranging in size from 40 to 150 acres. They like shallow wetlands one to three feet deep with a diverse mix of plenty of emergent and submergent vegetation and open water. If this type of habitat will be impacted, construction should be avoided in this habitat during the species’ nesting period of April 15 to June 15. If this habitat will not be impacted, the project is not likely to have an impact on this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus), a state endangered bird. This sparrow nests in grassland habitats with scattered shrub layers, disturbed open areas, as well as patches of bare soil. These summer residents normally migrate out of Ohio shortly after their young fledge or leave the nest. If this type of habitat will be impacted, construction should be avoided in this habitat during the species’ nesting period of May 1 to June 30. If this habitat will not be impacted, the project is not likely to impact this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the plains clubtail (Gomphus externus), a state endangered dragonfly. Impacts to medium to large size streams with sand and gravel substrates should be avoided and/or minimized to the fullest extent possible to avoid impacts to this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the purplish copper (Lycaena helloides), a state endangered butterfly. Due to the location, and the type of work proposed, this project is not likely to impact this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the Karner blue (Lycaeides Melissa samuelis), a state endangered and federally endangered butterfly. Due to the location, and the type of work proposed, this project is not likely to impact this species.

The pipeline route is within the range of the Canada darner (Aeshna canadensis), a state endangered dragonfly, the Hine’s emerald (Somatochlora hineana), a state and federally endangered dragonfly, the seepage dancer (Argia bipunctulata), a state endangered dragonfly, and the brush-tipped emerald (Somatochlora walshii), a state endangered dragonfly. Impacts to wetlands should be avoided and/or minimized to the fullest extent possible to avoid impacts to these species.

Due to the potential of impacts to federally listed species, as well as to state listed species, we recommend that this project be coordinated with the US Fish & Wildlife Service.

Real Estate: The Office of Real Estate offers the following comment.

If any of the Department’s managed property is accessed or utilized for the proposed project, a real estate agreement must be fully executed prior to anything taking place on the division’s property. It may take 6 months to have a fully executed agreement if one is required. Please contact Tara Paciorek, the Department’s Oil and Gas Coordinator, at 614-265-6661 should you believe an agreement is necessary.

Soil and Water: The Division of Soil and Water Resources has the following comment.

The division recommends the applicant follow the attached pipeline standard. If you have questions concerning the standard, please contact John Mathews of the Division at (614) 265-6685.

Scenic Rivers: The Division of Watercraft Scenic Rivers Program offers the following comment:

If you would like any guidance or recommendations related to best management practices and implementing a project near a state or national scenic river, please contact Bob Gable, Scenic River Program Manager, at 614-265-6814.

ODNR appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact John Kessler at (614) 265-6621 if you have questions about these comments or need additional information.

John Kessler ODNR Office of Real Estate 2045 Morse Road, Building E-2 Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693 [email protected] Approved Herpetologist

Kent Bekker Ralph Pfingsten 542 Centerfield Drive 347 Pineview Circle Maumee, Ohio 43537 Berea, Ohio 44017 [email protected] [email protected] 419.376.4384 440.243.7568

Jeff Davis Kristin Stanford 625 Crescent Road OSU Stone Laboratory Hamilton, Ohio 45013 P.O. Box 119 [email protected] Put-in-Bay, OH 43456 513.868.3154 [email protected] 419.285.1847

Gregory Lipps, LLC Doug Wynn 1473 County Road 5-2 241 Chase Street, Apt. A3L Delta, Ohio 43515-9657 Russell’s Point, Ohio 43348 [email protected] [email protected] 419.376.3441 614.306.0313

Tim O. Matson 5696 Matson Rd Geneva, OH 44041 [email protected] 440.417.8196

Draft

Pipeline Standard and Construction Specifications Note: This technical standard has been developed by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources in order to recommend what is considered best practice for the protection of soil, water and related resources during pipeline construction. These are not to be considered as mandatory requirements unless cited by other laws, rules or legal agreements. Users are encouraged to use them as guidance for development of plans, on‐site practices and implementation or for remediating problem areas.

I. Description A line of pipe with valves, pumps, and control devices used for the conveying of liquids, gases, or finely divided solids. Pipelines convey oil, gasoline, gas, water, or any other liquefied product. This specification provides measures intended to limit the impact of the pipeline construction on agricultural productivity or on other lands where maintaining the natural soil and drainage attributes is important.

II. Condition Where Practice Applies This practice applies where it is desirable or necessary to convey liquid or gaseous products in a closed conduit from one point to another point.

III. Definition of Terms Agricultural Land ‐ Land which is presently under cultivation; land which has been previously cultivated and not subsequently developed for non‐agricultural use; and cleared land which is capable of being cultivated. It includes land used for cropland, hayland, improved pastureland, managed woodlands, truck gardens, farmsteads, commercial agricultural related facilities, feedlots, livestock confinement systems, land on which farm buildings are located, and land in government set‐aside programs. Best Management Practice ‐ Any structural, vegetative or managerial practice (BMP) used to treat, prevent or reduce soil erosion or to capture pollutants such as sediment. Such practices may include temporary seeding of exposed soils, construction of retention basins for storm water control and scheduling the implementation of all BMP’s to maximize their effectiveness. Cropland ‐ Land used for growing row crops, small grains, or hay; includes land that was formerly used as cropland but is currently in a government set‐aside program, and pasture land formerly used as cropland. Inspector – A person qualified by education and experience for the purpose of evaluating pipeline construction in relation to soils removal and replacement, drainage repairs, corridor restoration and other items identified in this standard. This person is sometimes retained by the pipeline company for the above purposes, but may be a third party that is mutually agreed upon by the landowner and the pipeline company. Landowner ‐ Person(s) holding legal title to property on the pipeline route from whom the pipeline company is seeking, or has obtained, a temporary or permanent easement. Landowner’s Designate ‐ Any person(s) legally authorized by a landowner to make decisions regarding the mitigation or restoration of agricultural impacts to such landowner's property. Non‐Agricultural Land ‐ Any land that is not "Agricultural Land" as defined above.

Page 1 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Pipeline ‐ The pipeline and its related appurtenances. Pipeline Company ‐ The entity responsible for installing the pipeline, its successors, and assigns, on its own behalf and as operator of the company. Right‐of‐Way ‐ Includes the permanent and temporary easements that the pipeline company acquires for the purpose of constructing and operating the pipeline. Slope Breaker ‐ A ridge or channel constructed diagonally across a utility right‐of–way or a road (water bar) that is subject to erosion. Subsoil ‐ Subsoil is defined as the soil material that starts at the bottom of the topsoil to a depth of three feet. Exceptions to this are soils where fractured bedrock or hard bedrock is encountered before three feet. Subsurface Drain or Drainage ‐ Any artificial system of pipes or conduits designed to intercept, collect, and convey excess soil moisture to a suitable outlet. These may include: clay and concrete tile, vitrified sewer tile, corrugated plastic tubing, and stone drains. Surface Drains ‐ Any surface drainage system such as shallow surface field drains, grassed waterways, open ditches, or any other conveyance of surface water. Tenant ‐ Any person lawfully residing on or in possession of the land. Topsoil ‐ The upper most part of the soil commonly referred to as the plow layer, the A layer, or the A horizon, or its equivalent in uncultivated soils. It is the surface layer of the soil that has the darkest color or the highest content of organic matter (as Identified in the USDA Soil Survey and verified w/ right‐of‐ way samples). Topsoil is described as all surface and near surface soil horizons (layers) that have a moist Munsell color value of 4 and chroma of 3 or darker and a clay content increase of 10% or less between the individual horizons. On agricultural land at least the top eight inches will be considered topsoil. Horizons with up to a twenty‐five percent mixing of the subsoil into the topsoil by agricultural processes will still be considered topsoil. In areas demonstrating substantial soil erosion, topsoil colors may be lighter than a moist Munsell color value of 4 and chroma 3. In these areas the top 8 inches will be considered topsoil. Surface horizons with a moist Munsell color value of 4 and chroma of 3 or darker in forested areas that have not been plowed are typically thinner. In these areas the top six inches will be considered topsoil. In areas where the above conditions do not apply, the top eight inches will be considered topsoil on agricultural land and the top six inches will be considered topsoil on forested land that has not been plowed. Trench Breaker ‐ Trench breakers (also known as trench plugs) are barriers placed within an open pipeline excavation in order to slow flow and reduce erosion in the trench and also to prevent the trench from becoming a subsurface drainage path.

IV. Planning Phase A. Construction Plans and Maps The pipeline company shall provide the landowner general construction plan maps with the following information concerning agricultural areas/uses: 1. Pasture/Grazing areas including unimproved grazing areas (brushy or wooded land used by livestock), permanent open pasture (land devoted only to pasture use, not suited to tillage

Page 2 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

rotation), improved pasture (including tillable rotation pasture/hayland), and livestock fence lines. 2. Cropland areas including hayland, rotation cropland, long‐term cropland and agricultural lands enrolled in either the annual set‐aside or the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) of the U.S.D.A. Consolidated Farm Service Agency. Such lands will be identified through consultation with the offices of the Consolidated Farm Service Agency and the Soil and Water Conservation District. 3. Unique Agricultural Lands, which include specialty cropland (vegetables, berries, etc.), orchards, vineyards, maple sugarbushes, organic mucklands, and permanent irrigation systems. The areas mentioned above will be identified with the help of the Soil and Water Conservation Districts. B. Sensitive Agricultural Soils Sensitive agricultural soils are defined as areas of cropland, hayland, or pasture that are more susceptible than other agricultural soils to construction disturbance due to slope, relative soil wetness, and/or shallowness to bedrock. Wetness conditions are the result of factors such as landscape position, soil texture, seasonal water table and/or slowly permeable subsoil horizons (e.g., areas of laterally draining subsoils). All sensitive agricultural soils including, but not limited to, those identified in the soil survey as fragipans, lacustrine soils, dense basal tills, soils with a seasonally high water table, or soils with less than 5 feet of depth to bedrock are to be located and identified on the project map using the following codes: 1. "SE" ‐ designates the general area of soils sensitive to erosion due to R‐O‐W factor(s) of slope and/or the texture of exposed soil. 2. "SW" ‐ designates the general area of soils susceptible to soil horizon wetness as described above. 3. "SR" ‐ designates the general area of soils susceptible to shallow depth to bedrock. 4. "SO" ‐ designates the location of unavoidable organic mucklands. C. Other Features In addition, the pipeline company shall note the following information on the general construction plan maps or on the construction alignment sheets. 1. Other land and water management features including subsurface drainage areas (where they can be identified prior to construction), open ditches, diversions, diversion terraces, buried utility lines (for farmstead consumptive use), water sources (developed springs, etc.), grassed waterways, water impoundment structures (dams and ponds) and unnamed water flows. 2. Depth of cover if it varies from those listed in the Construction Specifications. 3. Any off right‐of‐way access roads and work or storage areas. Map all such areas identified at the time of the construction plan submission, indicating their proposed locations. Any other areas that may be identified during construction will be considered and filed as a change in the construction plans. 4. The planned location of any compressor stations, valve stations, metering and regulating stations and any other proposed facilities including pipeline markers. 5. Locations for best management practices for control of erosion, sediment and trench water.

Page 3 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Plans should note relevant sizes, grade, capacities and materials of practices. Trench breakers and slope breakers (permanent and temporary) shall be provided on the plan and during construction. See Figure 11 through 13 for more information regarding trench and slope breakers. Plans shall include notations of the distance between breakers based on percent of slope, or appended charts of breaker spacing by percent of slope. 6. General locations for subsurface intercept drains to control soil saturation and/or aid trench breakers in minimizing water piping, based on the sensitive agricultural soils data (see Section B) and site monitoring. Such locations will generally coincide with "SE" sensitive agricultural soils and breaks in slopes. D. Point of Contact during Construction Prior to the construction of the pipeline, the pipeline company shall provide to each landowner, landowner’s designate and/or tenant: the name, telephone number and mailing address of the pipeline company representative assigned to that geographic area and responsible for the liaison activities on behalf of the pipeline company. This pipeline company representative shall be the contact person both during construction and operational related activities. The pipeline company shall respond promptly to any landowner and/or tenant issues or concerns both during construction and long‐term operational activities.

V. Construction Specifications A. Ingress and Egress Routes Prior to the pipeline installation, the pipeline company and the landowner shall reach a mutually acceptable agreement on the route that will be utilized for entering and leaving the pipeline right‐of‐ way, should access to the right‐of‐way not be practical or feasible from adjacent segments of the pipeline right‐of‐way or from public highway or railroad right‐of‐ways. Where access road access ramps/pads are required from the highway to the pipeline construction area, the topsoil shall be removed and stockpiled for replacement, an underlayment of durable geotextile matting shall be placed over the exposed subsoil surface prior to the placement of temporary rock access fill material (see earlier materials regarding access road entrances and Figure 1 below). All such material will be removed upon completion of the project. The use of durable geotextile matting as an underlayment helps prevent rock and stone from becoming embedded in the subsoil material. Complete removal of the ramp upon completion of the project and restoration of the impacted site is required prior to topsoil replacement. B. Temporary Roads The location of temporary roads to be used for construction purposes will be negotiated with the Figure 1 Access road entrance. landowner and the tenant. The temporary roads will be designed to not impede proper drainage and will be built to minimize soil erosion on or near the

Page 4 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft temporary roads. Every attempt will be made to use existing farm lanes for access and to repair damages to the existing lanes. Upon construction completion, temporary roads may be left intact through mutual agreement of the landowner, the tenant and the pipeline company unless otherwise restricted by federal, state or local regulations. If the temporary roads are to be removed, the right‐of‐way upon which the temporary roads are constructed will be returned to its previous use and restored to a condition equivalent to that existing prior to their construction. C. Clearing of Brush and Trees in the Right‐of‐Way Unless otherwise restricted by federal, state or local regulations, the pipeline company shall follow the landowner's desires as stated in the easement agreement regarding the disposal of trees, brush and stumps of no value to the landowner by burning, burial, chipping, etc., or complete removal from any affected property. The pipeline company shall identify black cherry trees located on the right‐of‐way near active livestock use areas during the construction plan development. Black cherry tree vegetation is toxic to livestock when wilted and shall not be stockpiled in areas accessible to livestock. During the clearing phase, such vegetation will be disposed of in a manner that prevents contact with livestock. Unless otherwise restricted by federal, state or local regulations, the pipeline company shall follow the landowner's or landowner designate’s desires as stated in the easement agreement regarding the removal of tree stumps that the pipeline company might otherwise leave in the ground. D. Soil Removal and Protection 1. Topsoil and subsequent horizons shall be determined by a properly qualified inspector, soil scientist or soil technician who will set stakes or flags every 200 feet along the right‐of‐way identifying the depth of topsoil to be removed. Topsoil will be stripped to the actual depth of the topsoil, not to exceed 16 inches along the construction right‐of‐way and other areas where construction activities warrant (e.g. staging areas), including land that is currently forested. Full right‐of‐way topsoil stripping will avoid issues such as topsoil mixing from deep rutting and topsoil compaction. Topsoil may not be intermixed with subsoil materials. Topsoil will be stored in a windrow parallel to the pipeline trench in such a manner that it will not become intermixed with subsoil materials. In forested areas where clearing activities are necessary, minimal amounts of topsoil mixing may occur. 2. Topsoil shall be removed following clearing and prior to any activity by any equipment or delivery trucks. During the clearing/grading phase, the inspector shall monitor site‐specific depths of topsoil stripping. Topsoil shall be removed from the full width of the right‐of‐way and stockpiled along either edge and on the right‐of‐way. (See Figure 2.) Where right‐of‐way construction requires cut‐and‐fill of the soil profile across grades, to the extent practicable, topsoil stockpiling will be located on the up slope edge of the right‐of‐way (see Figure 3). Where topsoil cannot be separately stored on the up slope side, suitable right‐of‐way space will be provided Figure 2 Topsoil and other soil segregation.

Page 5 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

on the down slope side to ensure the complete segregation of the topsoil from all cut‐and‐fill material. 3. All subsoil material that is removed from the trench will be placed in a second windrow parallel to the pipeline trench that is separate from the topsoil windrow. If any soil horizon or section of the soil profile has a significant increase in the concentration of rock, that soil shall be separated in order to be placed back at pre‐existing contours. In no case shall the concentration of rock be increased in any section of the profile. 4. The soil below the subsoil (substratum) will be placed in a third windrow parallel to the pipeline Topsoil trench that is separate from the topsoil and subsoil windrows. 5. In backfilling the trench, the stockpiled substratum material will be placed back into the trench before replacing the subsoil and topsoil. 6. Refer to Item F of these construction specifications for procedures pertaining to rock removal from the subsoil and topsoil. 7. Refer to Item O for procedures pertaining to the alleviation of compaction of the topsoil. 8. The topsoil must be replaced so that after settling occurs, the topsoil's original depth and contour will be restored. The same shall apply where excavations are made for road, stream, drainage ditch, or other crossings. In no instance will the topsoil materials be used for any other purpose or removed from the right of way. 9. Surface drainage should not be blocked or hindered in any way. If excess spoil is produced, it will be removed offsite to prevent ridging. Adding additional spoil to the crown over the trench in excess of that required for settlement will not be permitted. E. Depth of Cover 1. Except for above‐ground piping Figure 3 Topsoil stockpiling on slopes appurtenances, such as mainline (NY State Dept. of Agriculture & Markets Pipeline Drawings). block valves, tap valves, meter stations, etc., and except as otherwise stated in the Agreement, tthe pipeline will be buried as follows: a) On cropland, pastureland or other agricultural land provide a minimum of 60 inches of cover. b) On wooded or brushy land that is not suitable for croplannd provide a minimum of 36 inches of cover. c) A minimum of 60 inches of cover shall be maintained over the top of the pipeline where

Page 6 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Staandard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

it crosses surface drains, diversions, grassed waterways, open ditches, and streams. 2. In those areas where rock in its natural formation is encountered, the minimum depth of cover will be 36 inches. 3. On agricultural land subject to erosion, the company is responsible for inspecting the pipeline right‐of‐way on a reasonably frequent basis in order to detect areas of erosion to the cover so that no cover will be less than 3 feet at any time. 4. A minimum of 12 inches of separation shall be maintained between the pipeline and drainage lines unless adequate measures are taken to protect the present and future integrity of the pipeline and the subsurface drain. F. Rock Removal (Shallow Soils) The cover within the pipeline trench, bore pits, or other excavations shall not be backfilled with soil containing rocks of any greater concentration or size than existed prior to the pipeline construction. The following rock removal procedures only pertain to rocks found in the topsoil, subsoil, and substratum. 1. Before replacing any topsoil, all rocks greater than 3 inches in any dimension will be removed from the surface of all exposed subsoil (i.e. work area and subsoil storage areas). All material placed above the pipe shall not contain rocks of any greater concentration or size than existed prior to the pipeline construction. 2. All rocks greater than 3 inches in any dimension will be removed from the topsoil surface using a rock rake following final restoration unless undisturbed areas adjacent to the ROW can be shown to contain similar concentration and size. 3. If trenching, blasting, or boring operations are required through rocky terrain, suitable precautions will be taken to minimize the potential for oversized rocks to become interspersed with adjacent soil material. Landowners/operators and adjacent landowners will be given timely notice prior to blasting. 4. Rocks and soil containing rocks removed from the subsoil areas, topsoil, or from any excavations will be returned to the pre‐existing soil horizon levels, hauled off the landowner's premises or disposed of on the landowner's premises at a location that is mutually acceptable to the landowner and the company and in accordance with any applicable laws or regulations.

Page 7 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

G. Repair of Damaged and Adversely Affected Subsurface Drains The pipeline company shall be responsible for correcting and repairing all subsurface drains that fall on the permanent and construction right‐of‐way to their original operating conditions. To prevent damaging repaired drains, permanent repairs to the subsurface drains are recommended after regular construction traffic has ceased and the right‐of‐way or temporary access area has been restored.

Damaged or severed subsurface drains shall be temporarily re‐connected before or during backfilling in order to maintain drainage. This shall be completed as soon as practicable, and the repair shall be maintained in good condition to allow for its proper function during the remainder of pipeline construction.

The following standards and policies shall apply to the permanent subsurface drain repair: 1. Prior to the pipeline installation, the pipeline company shall make all effort to locate all subsurface drains within the right‐of‐way. The pipeline company shall contact the local Soil and Water Conservation Districts and affected landowners/tenants for their knowledge of subsurface drain locations prior to the pipeline installation. All identified subsurface drains will be marked with highly visible flags or stakes to alert construction crews to the need for subsurface drain repairs. 2. Prior to the pipeline installation, plans for the repair of damaged subsurface drains shall be approved by the landowner, or the landowner’s designate. These plans may include individual subsurface drain replacement or reconfiguration of the subsurface drainage system to include new intercepting submains parallel to the pipeline (see Figure 10 drainage system with new submain). Technical assistance for the plan may be available from the local Soil and Water Conservation District. 3. Prior to the pipeline installation, plans for the repair of damaged subsurface drains shall be approved by the landowner, or the landowner’s designate. These plans may include individual subsurface drain replacement or reconfiguration of the subsurface drainage system to include new intercepting submains parallel to the pipeline (see Figure 10 drainage system with new submain). Technical assistance for the plan may be available from the local Soil and Water Conservation District. a. Severed tile shall be temporarily repaired as soon as possible to restore drainage. It is recommended that actively flowing tile immediately be repaired (temporary) to limit the addition of excess water to the pipeline trench and backfill. b. Animal guards, filters or caps meeting industry standards shall be placed on the open ends of any exposed subsurface drains to prevent the entry of soil, burrowing animals or foreign materials from entering and blocking the drainage system. 4. Before completing permanent repairs, all subsurface drains shall be examined by suitable means on both sides of the trench for their entire length within the right‐of‐way to check if any additional damage or blockage beyond the trench width has occurred. Inspection with a Closed‐ Circuit TV Camera is recommended (see figure 4). If a subsurface drain is found to be damaged or blocked within the easement, it shall be repaired to the condition prior to pipeline construction.

Page 8 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Figure 4 Subsurface drainage damaged during pipeline work must be inspected and repaired. 5. The pipeline company shall document the location and known elevations of all subsurface drains that are found and/or repaired and provide a photo or description of the repair to the landowner, or the landowner’s designate. The description should include a map, drawing or electronic database (CAD, GIS etc.) with the GPS latitude and longitude of drain lines encountered and repaired. This information shall also be provided to the local Soil and Water Conservation District for record keeping. 6. All subsurface drains shall be repaired or replaced with materials of equal or higher quality and of equal or larger inside diameter as those which were damaged or removed.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR IN–PLACE REPAIR OF SEVERED SMALL DIAMETER DRAINS 7. The subsurface drain repair shall maintain the original alignment, gradient and water flow to the greatest extent possible. In no instance shall the grade or slope of the repaired or replaced subsurface drain be decreased from the original.

8. Replacement drain tubing shall be permanently connected to existing drain tubing with slip coupling or other connectors that meet industry standards to ensure a proper seal.

9. Where subsurface drains severed by the pipeline trench are replaced, sufficient measures shall be taken to fully restore drainage. The repair shall be made as to prevent separation or sagging of drain tubing due to the unconsolidated trench backfill. The following methods (see figures 4 through 6) shall be considered adequate support for drains equal to or less than 10 inch in diameter and trench spans less than 14 feet. All other support systems shall be designed by a Registered Professional Engineer.

a. Corrugated plastic drain tubing shall be provided with rigid support of angle iron, channel iron, full‐round steel pipe, half‐round steel pipe, or a schedule 40 (or 80) PVC pipe or dual wall PE pipe 2 inches larger than the drain diameter. (Full round pipe shall be provided sufficient slots or holes for venting to prevent floatation.) The rigid support shall span the trench width and extend on both ends a minimum of 3 feet onto undisturbed soil.

Page 9 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

b. Lateral drains up to 6 inch in diameter may be replaced with schedule 40 or 80 PVC of the same diameter without additional rigid support along the replacement length provided the length of replacement can be made without use of a pipe joint (see Figures 5 through 10).

c. Clay or concrete tile shall be provided with a rigid support that extends to the first tile joint beyond the minimum 3‐foot distance.

d. In all cases, a firm foundation for the subsurface drain shall be provided by backfilling the trench from the bottom of the pipeline to 1 foot above drain repair with course aggregate or soil compacted in lifts at proper moisture content. Alternate methods of vertical support including stacked sand bags, sacks of concrete, pre‐fabricated piers or structural members may be used if approved by the landowner, or the landowner’s designate.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR INTERCEPTING SUBMAINS 10. New submains shall meet USDA‐NRCS Ohio Conservation Practice Standard 606. A plan for the submain shall be approved by the local Soil and Water Conservation District prior to construction.

11. The grade and diameter of the new submain shall carry the designed capacity of the existing subsurface drain system that flows into the submain. The design capacity shall be maintained to a free outlet or existing tile with sufficient capacity.

Notes: 1. Perforated pipe shall be installed so that holes are facing down. 2. Rigid support channel or pipe is shouldered back into the firm, undisturbed soil profile to ensure consistent gravity flow gradient of the drainage line across the trench as the backfill material gradually settles for up to two years. 3. To prevent sagging, support shall be provided from bottom of the trench to 1 foot above drain repair, by backfilling with coarse aggregate or suitable alternatives (sand bags, compacted soil, or similar structural support approved by the landowner). Figure 5 Repair of severed drainage. Page 10 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Notes: 1. Extend support and replacement drainage line a minimum of 3 feet onto undisturbed earth on both sides of trench, measured perpendicular from the wall of the trench.. 2. Provide rigid support for drain tile or plastic pipe to maintain function. 3. Should a drain cross a ditch at a skew of greater than 45 degrees, the replacement drain is to be relocated into undisturbed soil or out of conflict with the pipeline ditch. The replacement drain pipe is to be installed to match elevation of existing pipes. Figure 6 Repair of severed drainage lines.

Page 11 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Notes: 1. Trench breakers prevent gully erosion while the trench is opeen and help to inhibit water piping along the pipeline after backfilling. 2. Intercept drains receive soil moisture draining naturally from the undisturbed soil profile into the disturrbed backfill soil within the trench. The intercept drains help prevent saturated soil conditions along the pipeline. 3. Agricultural cropland may require cross trench drainage or parallel drainage. Figure 7 Interception of drainage crossing the pipeline trench.

Page 12 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Note: Parallel drainage installation shall be approved for agricultural soil conditions where repair of existing cross drainage would be less effective. For example, in situations of: 1. Shallow bedrock. 2. Interference by other utility lines. 3. Closely spaced shallow drains and french drains where a header is needed.

Figure 8 Interception of drainage crossing the pipeline trench.

Page 13 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Note: To be determined by an agricultural specialist based on slope and drainage area in consultation with the local Soil and Water Conservation District. Figure 9 A new submain may be needed to allow continued function of drainage systems.

Page 14 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Figure 10 Trench breakers reduce trench erosion and the volume and velocity of trench water at the bottom of the slope (figure from New York Department of Agriculture Pipeline standards).

Page 15 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Trench Breaker (also known as trench plugs) Spacing (Adapted from the Pennsylvania State Standards)

Slope (%) Spacing (feet) 0‐5 Not Required except at stream or water body crossings 5 ‐ 15 300 >15 – 30 200 >30 100

Notes:

1. Trench breakers are required upslope of all stream, river, or water‐body crossings regardless of

trench slope.

2. Depending on the specific conditions of slopes exceeding 40%, the spacing between trench

breakers may continue diminishing as illustrated, or may cease once a spacing of 33 feet has

been reached.

3. Trench breakers shall be sand bags or earth filled sacks (not topsoil), which are durable yet

flexible and will conform to gradual shifting of pipeline and backfill, while serving their function,

to impede the flow of subsurface water along the trench. Alternatively, cement filled bags or

mortared stone may be used.

4. In agricultural lands, the top of trench breaker will not be closer than two feet from the

restored surface.

Figure 11 Trench breakers (also known as trench plugs) should be placed in the trench before crossing water bodies and spaced in the trench based on the percent slope.

Slope (%) Spacing (feet) 5 ‐ 15 300 >15 – 30 200 >30 100

Figure 12 Slope breakers should be spaced based on the percent slope.

Page 16 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

H. Slope Breakers Slope breakers are necessary to limit erosion on most rights of way, except in cultivated and residential areas. Slope breakers shall divert surface runoff to adjacent stable vegetated areas or to energy‐dissipating devices. Water shall be released in a non‐erosive manner. Generally, slope breakers are installed immediately downslope of all trench breakers. The gradient (fall) for each slope breaker shall be two to four percent unless otherwise approved by state inspectors based on site conditions. Slope breakers shall be installed as specified on the construction drawings or with a maximum spacing as shown in Figure 12. I. Return to Pre‐construction Contours Once disturbed areas are stabilized and within 2 years of completion of pipeline construction, slope breakers, water bars, diversions and other similar grade stabilization structures shall be graded to original pre‐construction contour elevations (unless negotiated to remain with the landowner). J. Construction Debris, Erosion, Sediment and Other Pollution Control Practices and Restoration of Right‐of‐Way Best management practices shall be applied on pipeline projects in a timely manner to capture sediments and other pollutants, to prevent erosion and the release of pollution and to prevent degrading water resources. Practices applied, including slope breakers (Figure 12) shall meet the specifications and standards published by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Oil and Gas Resources, the Division of Soil and Water Resources, the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (Field Office Technical Guide) or other applicable standards. All construction‐related debris and material, including litter generated by the construction crews will be removed from the right‐of‐way. Following the completion of the pipeline or any significant portion, the right‐of‐way will be restored to its original pre‐construction elevation and contour. If uneven settling occurs or surface drainage problems develop as a result of the pipeline construction, the pipeline company will provide land leveling services within 45 days of being notified by the landowner. Delays due to poor weather and soil conditions may be permitted. K. Installations of Additional Drainage Lines The pipeline company shall be responsible for installing such additional drain and other drainage measures as are necessary to properly drain wet areas on the permanent and temporary right‐of‐ ways caused by the construction and/or existence of the pipeline. L. Repair of Damaged Soil Conservation Practices All soil conservation practices (such as spring developments and pipelines, terraces, grassed waterways, water and sediment control basins, critical area seedings, etc.) damaged by the pipeline’s construction will be restored to their pre‐construction condition and approved by the landowner or local SWCD. For example, grassed waterways shall be graded to original dimensions and grades with erosion control matting installed. Watering sources, such as spring developments, affected by pipeline construction, shall be replaced with an alternative supply of water within 24 hours of the watering source being disrupted unless the disruption has been negotiated with the landowner. An alternative supply of water shall be provided until the water source is fully functional at pre‐construction flow rates.

Page 17 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

M. Control of Trench Washouts, Water Piping and Blowouts Trench breakers shall be installed for the dual purpose of preventing trench washouts during construction and abating water piping and blowouts subsequent to trench backfill. The distances between permanent trench breakers will be as described in plans and meet the spacing shown in Figure 11. Plans will record each installed trench breaker location, by map‐referenced station‐ number. N. Pumping Of Water from Open Trenches No back filling shall be done in water filled trenches. All freestanding water shall be removed prior to any back filling. In the event it becomes necessary to pump water from open trenches, the pipeline company shall pump the water in a manner that will avoid damaging adjacent agricultural land, crops, and/or pasture. Such damages include, but are not limited to: inundation of crops for more than 24 hours, sheet and rill erosion, discharge of sediment in ditches and other water courses, and the deposition of gravel in fields, pastures, and any water courses. If it is impossible to avoid water‐related damages as described above, the pipeline company will restore the land, pasture, watercourses, etc. to their pre‐construction condition. All pumping of water shall comply with existing drainage laws, local ordinances relating to such activities, and provisions of the Clean Water Act. O. Compaction, Rutting, Fertilization, Liming, Seeding (Temporary and Permanent) and Mulching 1. In all agricultural sections of the right‐of‐way traversed by vehicles and construction equipment, where topsoil is stripped and prior to topsoil replacement, the subsoil shall be fractured by deep ripping to a depth of 16 inches below the surface of the subsoil with the appropriate industrial ripper. Note that some subsurface features (e.g. drain, other utilities) may warrant less depth. The ripper shall have maximum teeth spacing of 16 inches. The ripping shall be performed parallel to the pipeline and at 30 degrees to the pipeline. Following the ripping operation all stone and rock material three (3) inches and larger in size which has been lifted to the surface shall be collected and removed from the site for disposal. Upon approval by the inspector of the subsoil decompaction and the stone removal, the topsoil temporarily removed for the period of construction shall then be replaced. The soil profile in the full width of the right‐of‐way shall be shattered to a depth not to exceed 16 inches with a heavy‐ duty sub‐soiling tool having angled legs. Stone removal shall be completed, as necessary, to eliminate any additional rocks and stones brought to the surface as a result of the final subsoil shattering process. 2. The entire right‐of‐way will then be disked. Three passes will be made across any agricultural land that is ripped. 3. Ripping and disking will be done at a time when the soil is dry enough for normal tillage operations to occur on undisturbed farmland adjacent to the areas to be ripped. 4. All rutted and compacted land will be restored as near as practicable to its original condition. 5. All disturbed areas will be provided temporary and permanent vegetative cover as needed in order to prevent erosion and to re‐establish agreed upon vegetative cover. a. Establishment methods and vegetative targets for permanent cover (grasses, forbs,

Page 18 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

trees, or shrubs) that have been agreed upon by the landowner shall be utilized. b. Seeding or planting shall be repeated if a satisfactory stand has not been obtained after 1 growing season. c. Areas that reach final grade or are planned to be idle shall be seeded within 7 days of the most recent disturbance, or within 2 days within 50 feet of streams or water resources. Areas left idle during periods that are unsuitable for planting shall be provided appropriate cover using mulch or erosion control matting. Areas nearing or exceeding 3:1 slopes are candidates for use of rolled erosion control products (matting) or turf reinforcement matting if they are not cropped. d. All disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched according to guidance provided in the ODNR Rainwater and Land Development manual or USDA NRCS Standard Codes: i) 342 – Critical Area Planting, ii) 484 – Mulching, and iii) Appendix A Seeding Tables. In all areas where permanent vegetation is re‐established, the landowner will be consulted to select an appropriate weed‐free seed mixture or planting stock. Mulch should be held in place using tackifier or by crimping with a straight disk or other applicable implement, in order to prevent mulch from being removed by wind or runoff. 6. Depending upon the construction schedule and the landowner’s cropping plans, allowance may be made to allow the landowner to be appropriately compensated and to apply the appropriate type and amounts of fertilizer, manure, and/or lime in coordination with the landowner’s farming plans. In this case, an area may require temporary seeding and or mulch if an area is left idle for an extended number of days or weeks. 7. In Ohio, subsoil decompaction and topsoil replacement activities may have to be performed as weather permits due to the generally unsuitable weather for continuing agricultural land restoration in late autumn, winter, and early spring. P. Backfill Profile and Trench Crowning Material shall be used to backfill the trench in an order and manner that corresponds to the original profile, that is, substratum followed by subsoil and then topsoil. All rock not utilized as trench backfill material shall be removed from the right‐of‐way. The remaining backfill material shall consist of suitable subsoil material. Trench crowning shall occur during the trench backfilling operation using subsoil materials over the trench to allow for trench settling. In Ohio, this will be performed in accordance with Figure 13 below. In areas where trench settling occurs after topsoil spreading, imported topsoil shall be used to fill each depression. Topsoil from the adjacent agricultural land shall not be used to fill the depressions. Settlement inspections shall occur at 3 months, 1 year, 2 year and 3 years after construction has finished. In agricultural areas where the materials excavated during trenching are insufficient in quantity to meet backfill requirements, the soil of any agricultural land adjacent to the trench and construction zone shall not be used as either backfill or surface cover material. Under no circumstances shall any topsoil materials be used for pipe padding material or trench backfill. In situations where imported soil materials are employed for backfill on agricultural lands, such material shall be of similar texture and quality to the existing soils on site. Imported soils should be from similar soil types and free from noxious weeds and other pests to the extent possible.

Page 19 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Q. Fencing All fencing and gates removed for the installation of the pipeline shall be replaced or installed according to the landowner’s specifications. Temporary fencing shall be provided as necessary to restrict access to active work areas by livestock until there is adequate vegetative cover over the work area. R. Pipeline Markers Unless specified by law, pipeline markers shall be located at roads, fence lines and edge of field boundaries where they will not be damaged or disrupt farming operations. S. Reinforced Crossings Unless declined by the landowner, the pipeline company shall provide at least one reinforced crossing for the purpose of logging access on woodlots that will be isolated from the rest of the parcel or from public roads by the pipeline.

Figure 13 Filled pipeline trenches shall be crowned in order to allow for appropriate settling (trench crowning).

Page 20 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft

Three Year Monitoring and Remediation 1. General Monitoring and Remediation A monitoring and remediation period shall be provided of no less than three years immediately following the full‐length activation of the pipeline or the completion of initial right‐of‐way restoration, whichever occurs last. The pipeline company shall be responsible for the cost of the monitoring and remediation. The three‐year period allows for the effects of climatic cycles such as frost action, precipitation and growing seasons to occur, from which various monitoring determinations can be made. The monitoring and remediation phase shall be used to identify any remaining impacts associated with the pipeline construction that are in need of correction and to implement the follow‐up restoration. General right‐of‐way conditions to be monitored include topsoil thickness, relative content of rock and large stones, trench settling, crop production, drainage and repair of severed fences, etc. The problems or concerns shall be identified through on‐site monitoring of all areas along the right‐of‐way and through contact with the respective landowner/operator and local County Soil and Water Conservation District. Topsoil deficiency and trench settling shall be restored with imported topsoil that is consistent with the quality of topsoil on the affected site. Excessive amounts of rock and oversized stone material shall be determined by a visual inspection of the right ‐of‐way. Results shall be compared to portions of the same field located outside of the right‐of‐way. Included in the determination of relative rock and large stone content is the right‐of‐way's condition subsequent to tillage and the relative concentration of such materials within the right‐of‐way as compared to off the right‐of‐way. All excess rocks and large stones shall be removed and disposed of by the pipeline company. On‐site monitoring shall be conducted at least three times during the growing season and shall include a comparison of growth and yield for crops on and off the right‐of‐way. When the subsequent crop productivity within the affected right‐of‐way is less than that of the adjacent unaffected agricultural land, the landowner, in conjunction with the pipeline company as well as other appropriate organizations, shall help to determine the appropriate rehabilitation measures for the pipeline company to implement. During the various stages of the project, all affected farm operators shall be periodically apprised of the duration of remediation by the pipeline company. Because conditions that require remediation may not be noticeable at or shortly after the completion of construction, the signing of a release form prior to the end of the remediation period shall not relieve the pipeline company's responsibility to fully redress all project impacts. After completion of the specific remediation period, the pipeline company shall continue to respond to the reasonable requests of the landowner/operators to correct project related effects on the agricultural resources. On lands subject to erosion, the pipeline company shall patrol the pipeline right‐of‐way with reasonable frequency to detect erosion of the top cover. Whenever the loss of cover due to erosion creates a pollution or safety issue the pipeline company shall take corrective action. 2. Specific Monitoring and Remediation After the moisture of the soil profile on the affected right‐of‐way has returned to equilibrium with the adjacent off right‐of‐way land, subsoil compaction will be tested using an appropriate soil penetrometer or other soil compaction‐measuring device. Compaction tests shall be made for each soil type identified on the affected agricultural land. The subsoil compaction test results within the right‐of‐way shall be compared with those of the adjacent off right‐of‐way portion of the affected farm field/soil unit. Where representative subsoil density on the right‐of‐way exceeds the representative subsoil density outside

Page 21 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Draft the right‐of‐way, additional shattering of the soil profile shall be performed using a deep, angled‐leg subsoiler tool to a depth of 16 inches. Deep shattering shall be applied during periods of relatively low soil moisture to prevent additional subsoil compaction. Oversized stone/rock material, which is lifted to the surface as a result of the deep shattering, shall be removed and disposed outside of the right‐of‐ way. In the event that subsequent construction or cleanup activities result in new compaction, additional deep shattering shall be performed to alleviate such compaction. For lands disturbed within or adjoined to agricultural areas where the construction alters the natural stratification of soil horizons and natural soil drainage patterns, the pipeline company shall rectify the effects with measures such as subsurface intercept drainage lines (see Figure 8, Intercept Drain Cross‐ Trench). Selection of the type of intercept drainage lines to be installed to prevent surface seeps and the seasonally prolonged saturation of the backfilled trench zone and adjacent areas shall be performed by a qualified person. During monitoring and follow‐up remediation, drawings of the drain shall be provided to the landowner for review before the pipeline company begins the corrective action. All drain lines shall be installed according to Natural Resource Conservation Service standards and specifications. 3. Communication Access The pipeline company shall provide all landowners/operators with a telephone number to facilitate direct contact with the pipeline company and the project's Inspector(s) through all of the stages of the project, including operation and maintenance.

Page 22 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 10‐21‐14 Draft

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

ET Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Zack Lissard Date of Contact: January 21, 2015

Title: Project Manager Phone: 978-656-3661

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Megan Wolf

Title: Mitigation Coordinator Phone: 614-914-4243

Company: OEPA

Reason for Contact

To discuss wetland mitigation options in Ohio. Ms. Wolf stated that compensatory wetland mitigation options available in Ohio include purchasing credits from a mitigation bank, making a payment to an in-lieu fee program and permittee responsible mitigation. She also stated that there is sufficient mitigation credits available to offset the project’ET s anticipated impacts.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Lissard, Zachary

From: Devin Schenk Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:08 PM To: Lissard, Zachary Subject: RE: Credit Availability Inquiry Attachments: TNC ILF Final Instrument Approval Notification.pdf

Dear Zach,

Thank you for your inquiry in to the Ohio Stream and Wetland In‐Lieu Fee (ILF) Mitigation Program that is sponsored by The Nature Conservancy. The ILF program has stream and wetland credits available for purchase as compensatory mitigation. The program was approved by all three Army Corps Districts in Ohio on December 8, 2014. I’ve attached the ILF program’s Final Approval Letter from the agencies.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. We look forward to the possibility to being your compensatory mitigation provider.

Thank you,

Devin

Devin Schenk The Nature Conservancy Mitigation Program Manager Ohio Field Office 6375 Riverside Drive [email protected] Suite 100 (513) 324-7363 (Cell) Dublin, OH 43017 nature.org/ohio or Facebook

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Elizabeth DeCelles Date of Contact: 2/3/2015

Title: Environmental Scientist Phone: 978-656-3571

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Vince Messerly

Title: In-Lieu Fee Coordinator Phone: 740-503-0177

Company: Little Stillwater Mitigation Bank

Reason for Contact

I spoke with Vince Messerly from the Little Stillwater Mitigation Bank regarding available credits. Mr. Messerly said they have 95 available credits and In-Lieu-Fee (ILF) banking options. He mentioned working with TRC previously on a Spectra project in eastern Ohio. Call him back if you’re interested (Zack Lissard).

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

Describe items and commitments here if any.

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Kevin O’Brion Date of Contact: 2/9/2015

Title: Environmental Scientist Phone: 978-735-3425

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Joni Lung

Title: Phone: 614-644-2152

Company: Ohio EPA – Division of Surface Water

Reason for Contact

Spoke with Joni Lung regarding vernal pool regulations in Ohio. They are not regulated separately from wetlands, but rather included as jurisdictional wetlands or isolated wetlands and are therefore regulated under the State’s 401 WQC. For more info she suggested contacting Rachel Taulbee at 614-644-2494

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Zack Lissard Date of Contact: 2/09/2015

Title: Project Manager Phone: 978-656-3661

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Todd Surrena

Title: Permit Analyst Phone: (330) 963-1255

Company: OEPA

Reason for Contact

Discussed the approved pipeline installation methods within ODNR designated Coldwater Habitats, native fauna streams in Ohio. He stated that open-cut installation methods can be utilized in these streams, but there is an in-water work restriction period from April 15 – June 30.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Elizabeth DeCelles Date of Contact: 2/9/2015

Title: Environmental Scientist Phone: 978-656-3578

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Chris Kenah

Title: Phone: (614) 644-2712

Company: Ohio EPA – Division of Drinking and Groundwaters

Reason for Contact

I spoke briefly with Chris Kenah from the Ohio EPA, Division of Drinking and Groundwaters. He stated that Ohio does not designate aquifers for protection at the state level.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

MICHIGAN Patterson, Patricia

From: Hartz, Andrew (DEQ) Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 12:00 PM To: '[email protected]'; Patterson, Patricia Cc: Fairchild, Kathleen (DEQ); Tepatti, Susan (DEQ); Zacharda, Nicole (DEQ); Russell, Jon (DEQ); Vanderlaan, Mary (DEQ) Subject: ET Rover Pipeline/Michigan/Pre-filing Review Process

ThankyouforyourletterofJune25,2014regardingtheaboveissue.Wewouldliketoparticipateintheprefiling reviewprocess.Pleasekeepusinthelooponthisandadviseofthenextsteps...Andy Andrew J. Hartz District Supervisor Water Resource Unit Water Resources Division DEQ Southeast Michigan District Coordinator Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 27700 Donald Court Warren MI 48092-2793 586-753-3867-Direct line [email protected]

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Zack Lissard Date of Contact: 10/27/2014

Title: PM Phone: 978-656-3661

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Michael Pennington

Title: Mitigation Coordinator Phone: 517-284-5539

Company: MDEP

Reason for Contact

I also spoke with Michael Pennington with the MDEQ about approved mitigation options. He stated that Michigan does not currently have an In-lieu fee program, there are some proposed mitigation banks that could service the Project but they are not approved yet and that Permittee Responsible Mitigation is required if no bank credits are available.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

Describe items and commitments here if any.

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Elizabeth DeCelles Date of Contact: 2/9/2015

Title: Environmental Scientist Phone: 978-656-3578

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Brant Fisher

Title: Phone: (517) 284-6515

Company: Michigan DEQ – Water Wellhead Protection Division

Reason for Contact

I spoke briefly with Brant Fisher from the Michigan State DEQ, Water Wellhead Protection Division. He stated that Michigan does not designate aquifers for protection at the state level.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Results you can rely on

650 Suffolk Street Lowell, MA 01854

Main 978.970.5600 Fax 978-453-1995

219149 - Rover Pipeline Project

Record of Telephone Conversation

Caller Contact Information Name of Contact: Kevin O’Brion Date of Contact: 2/11/2015

Title: Environmental Scientist Phone: 978-735-3425

Company: TRC

Person Contacted Information Name of Contact: Amy Berry

Title: Phone: (517) 335-0002

Company: Michigan DEQ – Water Resources Division

Reason for Contact

This was a returned phone call regarding state regulations on vernal pools. It was discussed that vernal pools are regulated in the same manner as wetlands throughout the state.

Follow-up / Action Items Required

Yes ☐ No ☒

ENVIRONMENTAL • ENERGY • INFRASTRUCTURE

Patterson, Patricia

From: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 7:21 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Patterson, Patricia Subject: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan

HelloBuffy IreceivedacopyoftheETRoverPipelineprojectletterdatedJune25,2014.ThankyouforincludingtheMichigan DepartmentofNaturalResources(DNR)earlyintheFERCandNEPAprocess.InorderfortheDNRtoprovidecomments wewillneedmoredetailedinformationonwherethenewpipelinewillbeplacedonDNRland(HorseshoeLakeState GameArea,HollyStateRecreationArea,PinckneyStateRecreationArea)andhowmuchpermanenteasementversus temporaryworkspaceyouarerequesting.Thelegaldescriptionwouldbemostuseful–town,range,sectionlevel informationalongwithmoredetailedmaps. WerecommendyoucontactMichiganNaturalFeaturesInventoryconcerninginformationaboutrarespeciesandunique naturalcommunitiesinMichigan.TheyarethenaturalheritageinformationorganizationforMichigan.Theirinformation serviceswebpagecanbefoundat:http://mnfi.anr.msu.edu/services/informationservices.cfm Justaheadsup,anypubliclandwhereaneasementisrequestedandwherethelandwaspurchasedwithfederal PittmanRobertsonfundingrequiresreviewandapprovalbytheU.S.Fish&WildlifeService(USFWS).Thisreview requiresNEPAdocumentationandtakesasignificantamountoftimetogatherandcreatethepacketofinformationto sendtoUSFWS.TheprocessaveragesoneyearoncewehavetheinformationweneedtostartcreatingtheUSFWS packet. Pleaseletmeknowifthereareanyquestions. Thankyou, JenniferOlson LandMattersBiologist–SEregion DNRWildlifeDivision RoseLakeFieldOffice 8562EastStollRoad EastLansing,MI48823 Office:(517)6414903ext.266 Fax:(517)6416022 Did you know 60 threatened and 59 endangered animals call Michigan home at some point in their lives? 2014 marks the 40th anniversary of Michigan’s Endangered Species Act. Go to www.michigan.gov/wildlife for more information.

1 August 26, 2014

Jenifer Olsen, Lands – Oakland County Michigan Department of Natural Resources Rose Lake Wildlife Office 8562 East Stoll Road East Lansing, MI 48823

Subject: ET Rover Pipeline LLC Rover Pipeline Project West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan Project Update

Dear Ms. Olsen:

We thank you for your comments dated July 2, 2014 and would like to inform you of the following Project modifications that have resulted from ongoing discussions with producers and ongoing field surveys.

1300 Main Street | Houston, Texas 77002 | (713) 989-7000 Rover Pipeline Project August 26, 2014 Page 2 of 3

Pipelines Pipe Diameter Miles State Market Segment (Defiance to Border) 42-inch 208.0 OH, MI

Compressor Station Horsepower State Defiance Compressor Station 25,900 OH

We thank you for your time and assistance with the planning of this Project and look forward to meeting with you.

Sincerely,

Buffy Thomason ET Rover Pipeline LLC

Attachment: General Location Map USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral

Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

(! Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS (! WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 Patterson, Patricia

From: Thomason, Buffy Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:25 PM To: 'Olson, Jennifer (DNR)' Cc: Patterson, Patricia Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan Attachments: Market_08162014.zip

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed

Ms.Olson,attachedareupdatedshapefilesfromourFERCfilingon8/23/14.Therehavebeensome significantchangestotheproposedlineinMichigan.WemovedoutofHorseshoeLakeandHollyState. Pleasereviewthisrouteatyourconvenience.Wewouldliketodiscusswhereweneedtogofromhereonce youhavereviewedit.Wewouldbehappytocometoyourofficeforameetingifyouprefer. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 8:38 AM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan IwasnotfamiliarwithKMZfilesbutwordisIcanbringitintoGISsoI’lltrythat.Waitontheneedforashapefile! Thanks, JenniferOlson LandMattersBiologist–SEregion DNRWildlifeDivision RoseLakeFieldOffice 8562EastStollRoad EastLansing,MI48823 Office:(517)6414903ext.266 Fax:(517)6416022 Did you know 60 threatened and 59 endangered animals call Michigan home at some point in their lives? 2014 marks the 40th anniversary of Michigan’s Endangered Species Act. Go to www.michigan.gov/wildlife for more information. From: Thomason, Buffy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 2:40 PM To: Olson, Jennifer (DNR)

1 Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan Jennifer,attachedisakmzfileoftherevisedroutewesubmittedtoFERClastweek,witha400footbufferon it.Thisisthelinewearebeginningsurveysof,andisagoodplacetostartdiscussionsofthestateproperties wearecurrentlycrossing.The400footbufferiswiderthantheconstructionarea,butitwouldencompassall constructionareas,plusalittleroomfortheengineerstomakeadjustmentswithoutusneedingto resurvey.Wewon’thaveworkspaceconfigureduntillaterintheyearaftercivilandenvironmentalsurveys arecomplete,soIwouldratherstartwiththisfileanddiscussfromherethanwaitseveralmoremonths,if that’sagreeabletoyou.Also,Iseethatyouhadaskedforashapefile,andIcangetthattoyou,butIhadthis onehandy,soIwantedtopassitalong.Ifyoustillneedtheshapefile,justletmeknow. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:19 PM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan Soundsfine.Thanks! Jennifer From: Thomason, Buffy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 2:13 PM To: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan Okay,thankyou.Weareplanningtoflytheproposedlineswithahelicopternextweektoseeifwecanadjust thelinealittlemoretooptimizeit.I’dliketowaituntilwecompletethatbeforeIsendyoualinefile.Itmay notbereadyuntiltheweekafternext. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:24 PM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan HiBuffy I’mbackfromvacation.Thesooneryouhavesomethingforusthebetterforourreviewprocess.Althoughthemore precisetheinformationthebetteralso(centerlinelocations,easementwidths,temporaryworkspacerequests,etc.).If

2 federalpurchasedlandisinvolveditwilltakeapproximately1yeartogetapacketofinformationtogetherandreceivea responsefromtheUSFWS.Ashapefilewouldbegreat. Thankyou, JenniferOlson LandMattersBiologist–SEregion DNRWildlifeDivision RoseLakeFieldOffice 8562EastStollRoad EastLansing,MI48823 Office:(517)6414903ext.266 Fax:(517)6416022 Did you know 60 threatened and 59 endangered animals call Michigan home at some point in their lives? 2014 marks the 40th anniversary of Michigan’s Endangered Species Act. Go to www.michigan.gov/wildlife for more information. From: Thomason, Buffy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 1:09 PM To: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan Hi,thankyouforlettingusknowyougottheletterandwhatwecandoforyou.Itmaytakeusalittlewhile togetactualworkspacesetup.Atthispoint,wecouldgetyouthecenterlinethatwe’relookingat.But,itmay changeaswesurveyitwithcivilandenvironmental/culturalsurveys.Wouldithelptogetyouwhatwehave now?WouldyouliketheshapefilesorkmzfilesforGoogleEarth,orjusttheTRSinformation? Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113 From: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 6:21 PM To: Thomason, Buffy Cc: [email protected] Subject: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan HelloBuffy IreceivedacopyoftheETRoverPipelineprojectletterdatedJune25,2014.ThankyouforincludingtheMichigan DepartmentofNaturalResources(DNR)earlyintheFERCandNEPAprocess.InorderfortheDNRtoprovidecomments wewillneedmoredetailedinformationonwherethenewpipelinewillbeplacedonDNRland(HorseshoeLakeState GameArea,HollyStateRecreationArea,PinckneyStateRecreationArea)andhowmuchpermanenteasementversus temporaryworkspaceyouarerequesting.Thelegaldescriptionwouldbemostuseful–town,range,sectionlevel informationalongwithmoredetailedmaps. WerecommendyoucontactMichiganNaturalFeaturesInventoryconcerninginformationaboutrarespeciesandunique naturalcommunitiesinMichigan.TheyarethenaturalheritageinformationorganizationforMichigan.Theirinformation serviceswebpagecanbefoundat:http://mnfi.anr.msu.edu/services/informationservices.cfm

3 Justaheadsup,anypubliclandwhereaneasementisrequestedandwherethelandwaspurchasedwithfederal PittmanRobertsonfundingrequiresreviewandapprovalbytheU.S.Fish&WildlifeService(USFWS).Thisreview requiresNEPAdocumentationandtakesasignificantamountoftimetogatherandcreatethepacketofinformationto sendtoUSFWS.TheprocessaveragesoneyearoncewehavetheinformationweneedtostartcreatingtheUSFWS packet. Pleaseletmeknowifthereareanyquestions. Thankyou, JenniferOlson LandMattersBiologist–SEregion DNRWildlifeDivision RoseLakeFieldOffice 8562EastStollRoad EastLansing,MI48823 Office:(517)6414903ext.266 Fax:(517)6416022 Did you know 60 threatened and 59 endangered animals call Michigan home at some point in their lives? 2014 marks the 40th anniversary of Michigan’s Endangered Species Act. Go to www.michigan.gov/wildlife for more information. Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender. Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender. Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender. Private and confidential as detailed here. If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.

4 Patterson, Patricia

From: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 10:16 AM To: Ihnken, Alicia (DNR) Cc: [email protected]; Patterson, Patricia Subject: FW: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan Attachments: Market_08162014.zip; August_26_2014_ET_Rover_letter.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

HelloAlicia DonAversprovidedmewithyourname.LetmeknowifsomebodyelseshouldbereceivingthisinformationforParks andRecreationDivision(PRD). ETRoverPipelineLLCoutofHouston,TexasisproposinganewnaturalgaspipelinethroughpartsofWestVirginia, Pennsylvania,OhioandMichigan,andultimatelyintoOntario,Canada.Thepipelineisproposedtobe42inchesin diameterand208mileslongbetweenOhioandMichigan.I’veattachedtheirmostrecentAugust26,2014letterforyour reference. IwasintouchwithETRoverPipelineearlierinthesummer(July)whentheroutewasgoingthroughHorseshoeLake SGA.TheyhavesincechangedtherouteanditappearstonotbegoingthroughanyWildlifeDivisionStateGameAreas. ItdoesappeartobegoingthroughtwoareasofPRDland.I’vetakenabrieflookattheshapefile(attachedaszipfile) andherearetheTown,Range,SectionsthatmayaffectPRDlands: PinckneyRecArea T1NR4Esection20,21 T1SR4Esection9,10 PollyAnnTrail T7NR11Esection25 T7NR12Esection30 LetmeknowifyouhaveanyquestionsofifyouseethatWildlifeDivisionshouldbeinvolvedinsomeway. Thankyou, JenniferOlson LandMattersBiologist–SEregion DNRWildlifeDivision RoseLakeFieldOffice 8562EastStollRoad EastLansing,MI48823 Office:(517)6414903ext.266 Fax:(517)6416022 FallhuntingseasonsbegininSeptember!Areyouready?PurchaseyourrequiredlicensesatELicense. REMEMBERtoapplyforthePureMichiganHuntforyourchancetowinhuntinglicensesandover$4,000inprizes! From: Thomason, Buffy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:25 PM 1 To: Olson, Jennifer (DNR) Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: ET Rover Pipeline project in Michigan Ms.Olson,attachedareupdatedshapefilesfromourFERCfilingon8/23/14.Therehavebeensome significantchangestotheproposedlineinMichigan.WemovedoutofHorseshoeLakeandHollyState. Pleasereviewthisrouteatyourconvenience.Wewouldliketodiscusswhereweneedtogofromhereonce youhavereviewedit.Wewouldbehappytocometoyourofficeforameetingifyouprefer. Thankyou, BuffyThomason EnergyTransferCompany O:7139892844,C:9795713113

2 From: Lissard, Zachary [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 4:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: ET Rover Pipeline - Michigan Natural Features Inventory Rare Species Review Request Dear Sir or Madam,

Please find attached the Michigan Natural Features Inventory Rare Species Review Request for the portion of the ET Rover Pipeline Project located within the state of Michigan.

If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at [email protected] or at 978- 656-3661

Thanks,

Zack Lissard 650SuffolkStreet,Lowell,MA01854 T:9786563661|F:9786563616|C:9787701649 FollowusonLinkedInorTwitter|www.trcsolutions.com

September 22, 2014

Via Email

Michigan Natural Features Inventory Information Services and Requests PO Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901

Re: ET Rover Pipeline LLC - Proposed Rover Pipeline Project Natural Features Inventory Rare Species Review Request

Dear Sir or Madam:

A portion, approximately 108.8 miles, of the proposed pipeline will be located within the state of Michigan. A list of the counties and USGS quadrangle traversed by the Project is attached. On behalf of ET Rover, TRC Environmental Corporation is requesting that your office provide us with a review of potential rare, threatened, and endangered species and unique habitats that may occur within one mile on each side of the proposed centerline. For your review, please find attached KML files of the proposed centerline and USGS maps (Figure 1) showing the location of the Project in Michigan.

Thank you for your assistance with this request. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information at 978-656-3661 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

TRC Environmental Corp.

Zack Lissard Project Manager

Cc: Buffy Thomason – ET Rover Pipeline LLC Patricia Patterson - TRC

September 22, 2014 Page 2

Attachments: Figure 1 – General Location Map County and USGS Quadrangle List KML Files of the Project Centerline

County and USGS Quadrangle Information

Counties

Genesee Lapeer Lenawee Livingston Macomb Oakland Shiawassee St. Clair Washtenaw

USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangles

Adair Saint Clair Adrian Swartz Creek Allenton Almont Bridgewater Byron Clayton Corunna SE Davisburg Dexter Fenton Flint South Fowlerville Goodrich Thornville Tipton Gregory Hadley Linden Manchester Memphis Metamora Parkers Corner Pinckney Rattle Run Richmond Rome Center USACE District SENECA Buffalo

Mainline CS 3 )" HANCOCK CRAWFORD Mainline ASHLAND WAYNE USACE District RICHLAND Buffalo Mainline CS 2 )" STARK USACE District Pittsburgh

CARROLL

Hillman Lateral Mainline CS 1 Hillman CS )" )" TUSCARAWAS USACE District JEFFERSON Huntington

Cadiz CS )" HARRISON WASHINGTON USACE District Louisville

BELMONT Majorsville CS )" Clarington Lateral Seneca Lateral Majorsville Lateral Berne MS Seneca CS )" MARSHALL )"(! NOBLE Clarington CS

Berne Lateral MONROE

Sherwood Lateral WETZEL

Wayne National Forest TYLER

Sherwood to CGT Lateral

Sherwood CS "(! ) Sherwood to CGT MS DODDRIDGE (! Meter Station (MS) Sherwood to CGT Lateral Majorsville Lateral USACE Districts )" Compressor Station (CS) Sherwood Lateral Hillman Lateral Protected Lands Owner Type ² Berne Lateral Mainline Federal Seneca Lateral Market Segment State ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT 0 10 20 Clarington Lateral Local Government Miles PIPELINE FACILITIES Private and Other IN WV, PA, OH, AND MI Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 1 OF 2 AUGUST 2014 GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Mr. Zack Lissard October 7, 2014 TRC Environmental Corp. Wannalancit Mills 650 Suffolk Street, Suite 200 Lowell, MA 01854

Re: Rare Species Review #1530 – ET Rover Pipeline LLC – Proposed Rover Pipeline Project – 180 miles of pipeline involving 9 Michigan counties.

Hello:

The location for the proposed project was checked against known localities for rare species and unique natural features, which are recorded in the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) natural heritage database. This continuously updated database is a comprehensive source of existing data on Michigan's endangered, threatened, or otherwise significant plant and animal species, natural plant communities, and other natural features. Records in the database indicate that a qualified observer has documented the presence of special natural features. The absence of records in the database for a particular site may mean that the site has not been surveyed. The only way to obtain a definitive statement on the status of natural features is to have a competent biologist perform a complete field survey.

Under Act 451 of 1994, the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, Part 365, Endangered Species Protection, “a person shall not take, possess, transport, …fish, plants, and wildlife indigenous to the state and determined to be endangered or threatened,” unless first receiving an Endangered Species Permit from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), Wildlife Division. Responsibility to protect endangered and threatened species is not limited to the lists below. Other species may be present that have not been recorded in the database.

MSU EXTENSION According to the natural heritage database several legally protected species have been documented within 1.5 miles of the project site. Therefore, it is likely that negative impacts will Michigan Natural Features Inventory occur. Keep in mind this response represents a desktop review of the natural heritage database and that MNFI cannot fully evaluate this project without visiting the project site. MNFI offers PO Box 13036 Lansing MI 48901 several levels of Rare Species Reviews, including field surveys which I would be happy to discuss

(517) 284-6200 with you. Fax (517) 373-9566 Sincerely, mnfi.anr.msu.edu

Michael A. Sanders Rare Species Review Specialist

Michigan Natural Features Inventory

MSU is an affirmative- action, equal-opportunity employer.

Rare Species Review #1530 TRC Solutions ET Rover Pipeline Project Comments

NOTE: It is important to note that it is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with both state and federal threatened and endangered species legislation. Therefore, if a state listed species occurs at a project site, and you think you need an endangered species permit please contact: Lori Sargent, Nongame Wildlife Biologist, Wildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 30444, Lansing, MI 48909, 517-284-6216, or [email protected]. If a federally listed species is involved and, you think a permit is needed, please contact Barb Hosler, Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, East Lansing office, 517-351-6326, or [email protected].

The state threatened wavyrayed lampmussel (Lampsilis fasciiola) has been known to occur in Iron Creek NW of Clinton, MI in Section 24 of T04S R03E. The wavyrayed lampmussel occurs in and near riffles in small to medium sized rivers with good current and gravel and/or sand bottoms. One of the most important differences between the freshwater mussels in the Unionidae family and other freshwater bivalves is their unique life cycle. Unionid mussels require a fish host to complete their life cycle, whereas other bivalve families produce free- swimming larvae that develop into the adult form without a host. Eggs from female mussels are fertilized and develop into larvae, called glochidia, within the gills of the female mussel. The glochidia larvae are released into the water and must attach to a suitable fish host to survive and transform into the adult mussel. The single known host fish of the wavyrayed lampmussel is the smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu).

The state endangered silver shiner (Notropis photogenis) has been observed in the River Raisin in where the project crosses in Sections 1 & 12 of T04S R03E. This fish is known from only two locations in Michigan (based on fish technical committee notes – 2005). The silver shiner inhabits medium to large streams with moderate to high gradients. This species is usually found in deeper water (about 110 cm deep), commonly in pools or eddies immediately below riffles. Silver shiners have been documented to prefer gravel and boulder, pebble and cobble, sand, mud and clay substrates. This species avoids areas with heavy vegetation and siltation. Feeding occurs primarily at the surface where they eat aquatic insects. The silver shiner spawns in June. Conservative spoils management during bridge replacement is very important to minimize the impact to this fish. No heavy machines should be allowed in the streambed to prevent sedimentation of the habitat and suspension of solids in the water.

The state threatened wavyrayed lampmussel (Lampsilis fasciiola) has been known to occur in the River Raisin where the project crosses in Sections 1 & 12 of T04S R03E. See species information above.

The state threatened purple wartyback (Cyclonaias tuberculata) has been observed in the River Raisin in Section 1 of T04S R03E. The purple wartyback mussel inhabits medium to large rivers that have gravel or mixed sand and gravel substrates. Suitable habitat for fish host species must be present for purple wartyback reproduction to be successful. Known hosts for the purple wartyback are the yellow bullhead (Ameiurus natalis) and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), in addition there may be others. If allowed to, purple wartybacks can live to over 25 years. The purple wartyback is a summer breeder with fertilized eggs and glochidia released during one summer.

The state endangered hickorynut (Obovaria olivaria) has been observed in the River Raisin in Section 1 of T04S R03E. This mussel inhabits medium-sized streams in sand and gravel in areas with moderate flow. The round hickorynut is a historically wide-ranging species that has disappeared from many areas due to alterations in stream flow, habitat destruction and fragmentation, and degradation in water quality.

The state and federally endangered snuffbox (Epioblasma triquetra) has been known to occur in the Portage River in Section 3 of T01S R04E. The snuffbox inhabits rivers and streams with cobble, gravel, or sand bottoms in swift currents and usually is deeply buried in the substrate. Glochidia, the parasitic larval stage of the mussel, are released from May to mid-July. In Michigan, the only host fish known for snuffbox is the log perch (Percina caprodes). In other parts of their range the banded sculpin (Cottus carolinae) is also a known host. After completing the parasitic stage and reaching adulthood, snuffbox remains relatively sessile on the river bottom, living between 8-10 years. The best time to survey for snuffbox is April through September.

The special concern and federal candidate Eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus) has been known to occur in Portage Lake Fen in Section 3 of T01S R04E. Eastern massasauga rattlesnakes are found in a variety of wetland habitats including bogs, fens, shrub swamps, wet meadows, marshes, moist grasslands, wet prairies, and floodplain forests. Populations in southern Michigan are typically associated with open wetlands, particularly prairie fens, while those in northern Michigan are better known from lowland coniferous forests, such as cedar swamps. These wetland habitats can be occupied from early fall to late spring (typically from late September or October into June). In early spring some massasauga move into adjacent well- drained uplands to spend the warmer months foraging in shrubby fields and grasslands, including pastures and hay fields. These snakes usually overwinter singly in crayfish or mammal burrows, often close to the groundwater level, and emerge in April as water levels rise.

Conservation efforts should focus on preserving wetlands and contiguous uplands. If a massasauga rattlesnake is observed it should be left alone and allowed time to retreat. The snake should not be handled or harassed. This rattlesnake is generally shy and unaggressive and offers little danger to reasonably cautious people willing to leave them alone. The massasauga’s first line of defense is to avoid being seen, and its earth-toned color pattern offers excellent camouflage. Most will “freeze” when approached and frequently remain undetected by people passing close by. Any sightings of massasauga should be reported to the Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Division, at the address above. If possible, a photo of the live snake is also recommended. As a species of special concern, the massasauga is not protected under state or federal endangered species legislation, but it is becoming rare throughout its range and it is protected under the authority of the Department of Natural Resources Director’s Order, Regulations on the Take of Reptiles and Amphibians, dated October 12, 2001 (section 324 of PA 451). Efforts to minimize impacts to the species now may eliminate the need to list the species in the future. This species is currently a candidate for federal protection/listing.

The state threatened wavyrayed lampmussel (Lampsilis fasciiola) has been known to occur in the Portage River in Section 3 of T01S R04E. See species information above.

The special concern and federal candidate Eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus) has been known to occur near Mill Pond in Section 22 of T01N R04E. Please see species information above.

The state threatened spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata) has been known to occur in Section 27 of T01N R04E. Spotted turtles inhabit shallow ponds, wet meadows, tamarack swamps, bogs, fens, marsh channels, sphagnum seepages, and slow streams. Common qualities of occupied habitats include clear, shallow water with a mud or muck bottom and ample aquatic and emergent vegetation. Spotted turtles often wander on land and may turn up in temporary ponds. Spotted turtles are difficult to find in summer, due to reduced movement and lack of basking activity. When frightened while in or adjacent to water, they will dive to the bottom and bury themselves in the mud or beneath vegetation. They typically hibernate in shallow water from mid-October to late March.

Spotted turtles are omnivorous, but with a decided preference for animal food. June is the primary month females leave their drying pools to nest. They will seek a sunny, open spot with sandy or loamy soil that is moist but well drained to lay eggs. If such places are scarce, they may nest in grassy sites or in the tops of grass or sedge hummocks. Most spotted turtle hatchlings emerge from the nest in August or September. These hatchlings will reach maturity in 8-10 years. Protection of upland nesting habitat adjacent to identified and active core wetland habitats is required for the continued survival of this species. Wetland fill activity should avoid the hibernation period since the turtles would be unable to actively avoid the activity.

The special concern and federal candidate Eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus) has been known to occur in Sections 22 & 27 of T01N R04E. Please see species information above.

The special concern and federal candidate Eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus) has been known to occur in Sections 1 & 36 of T06N R09E, and in Section 31 of T06N R10E. Please see species information above.

The state threatened slippershell (Alasmidonta viridis) has been known to occur in the Belle River in Sections 1 & 12 of T05N R15E. Slippershell mussels typically inhabit creeks and the headwaters of rivers in sandy or gravel substrates, but it is occasionally found in muddy substrates. Host fish in Michigan include the johnny darter (Etheostoma nigrum) and mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdii). The slippershell mussel is likely a long-term breeder, holding the larvae internally for about a year. Dates of spawning are unknown.

Comments for Rare Species Review #1530: It is important to note that it is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with both state and federal threatened and endangered species legislation. Therefore, if a state listed species occurs at a project site, and you think you need an endangered species permit please contact: Lori Sargent, Nongame Wildlife Biologist, Wildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 30444, Lansing, MI 48909, 517-284-6216, or [email protected]. If a federally listed species is involved and, you think a permit is needed, please contact Barb Hosler, Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, East Lansing office, 517-351-6326, or [email protected].

Special concern species and natural communities are not protected under endangered species legislation but efforts should be taken to minimize any or all impacts. Species classified as special concern are species whose numbers are getting smaller in the state. If these species continue to decline they would be recommended for reclassification to threatened or endangered status.

Please consult MNFI’s Rare Species Explorer for additional information regarding the listed species: http://mnfi.anr.msu.edu/explorer/search.cfm.

Table 1: Legally protected species within 1.0 miles of RSR #1530

Clemmys guttata Spotted turtle 1974 1974-07-28 T G5 S2 Animal Cryptotis parva Least shrew 1916 1916-10-31 T G5 S1S2 Animal Rallus elegans King rail 1936 1936-06-19 E G4 S1 Animal Galearis spectabilis Showy orchis 1948 1948-05-06 T G5 S2 Plant Rallus elegans King rail 1945 1952-08-26 E G4 S1 Animal Speyeria idalia Regal fritillary 1932 1956 E G3 SH Animal Cypripedium candidum White lady slipper 1949 1949-05-17 T G4 S2 Plant Erynnis persius persius Persius dusky wing 1934 1934 T G5T1T3 S3 Animal Asclepias purpurascens Purple milkweed 1946 1946-07-07 T G5? S2 Plant Asclepias purpurascens Purple milkweed 1959 1959-06-27 T G5? S2 Plant Dendroica cerulea Cerulean warbler 1995 1995-06-08 T G4 S3 Animal Clemmys guttata Spotted turtle 1973 1974 T G5 S2 Animal Astragalus canadensis Canadian milk vetch 1921 1921-07-08 T G5 S1S2 Plant Cypripedium candidum White lady slipper 1916 1991-05-27 T G4 S2 Plant Platanthera leucophaea Prairie white-fringed orchid 1884-pre 1884-pre LT E G3 S1 Plant Carex lupuliformis False hop sedge 1964 1964-07-26 T G4 S2 Plant Rallus elegans King rail 1942 1942-07-20 E G4 S1 Animal Acris crepitans blanchardi Blanchard's cricket frog 1906 1907-10-19 T G5T5 S2S3 Animal Acris crepitans blanchardi Blanchard's cricket frog 1973 1976 T G5T5 S2S3 Animal Speyeria idalia Regal fritillary 1932 1932-07-31 E G3 SH Animal Morus rubra Red mulberry 1961 1961-09-23 T G5 S2 Plant Callitriche heterophylla Large water starwort 1896 1896-08-08 T G5 S1 Plant Cryptotis parva Least shrew 1924 1939-02-04 T G5 S1S2 Animal Silphium integrifolium Rosinweed 1984 1984-06-15 T G5 S2 Plant Ammocrypta pellucida Eastern sand darter 2000-07-26 2000-07-26 T G3 S1S2 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 2001-06-14 2001-06-14 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Noturus stigmosus Northern madtom 1990 1990 E G3 S1 Animal Clemmys guttata Spotted turtle 1993-06-04 2001-05 T G5 S2 Animal Carex albolutescens Sedge 1998-08-16 1998-08-16 T G5 S2 Plant Acris crepitans blanchardi Blanchard's cricket frog 1948 1948-04-07 T G5T5 S2S3 Animal Speyeria idalia Regal fritillary 1953 1953 E G3 SH Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 2000-2001 2000-2001 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Lampsilis fasciola Wavyrayed lampmussel 2000-2001 2000-2001 T G5 S2 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 2000-2001 2000-2001 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 2000-2001 2000-2001 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Phoxinus erythrogaster Southern redbelly dace 1978-11-02 1978-11-02 E G5 S1 Animal Notropis anogenus Pugnose shiner 1938 1938-08-25 E G3 S3 Animal Clemmys guttata Spotted turtle 1909 1909-04 T G5 S2 Animal Notropis photogenis Silver shiner 1973-09-02 1995-07-08 E G5 S1 Animal Cyclonaias tuberculata Purple wartyback 1996-1997 1996-1997 T G5 S2S3 Animal Obovaria olivaria Hickorynut 1996-1997S 1996-1997 E G4 S2S3 Animal Speyeria idalia Regal fritillary 1890 1931 E G3 SH Animal Asclepias sullivantii Sullivant's milkweed 2005-07-20 2005-07-20 T G5 S2 Plant Ixobrychus exilis Least bittern 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 T G5 S2 Animal Asclepias sullivantii Sullivant's milkweed 2000-08-01 2000-08-01 T G5 S2 Plant Platanthera ciliaris Orange- or yellow-fringed orchid 1921 1921-07-08 E G5 S1S2 Plant Gentiana flavida White gentian 1900-PRE E G4 S1 Plant Epioblasma triquetra Snuffbox 1931 1977-07-01 E E G3 S1 Animal Obovaria subrotunda Round hickorynut 1951 2009-07-14 E G4 S1 Animal Lampsilis fasciola Wavyrayed lampmussel 2002-08-21 2002-08-21 T G5 S2 Animal Lampsilis fasciola Wavyrayed lampmussel 1965 1994-06 T G5 S2 Animal Lampsilis fasciola Wavyrayed lampmussel 1927 1996-1997 T G5 S2 Animal Lampsilis fasciola Wavyrayed lampmussel 1903 1931-08-01 T G5 S2 Animal Lampsilis fasciola Wavyrayed lampmussel 1931 2008-07-31 T G5 S2 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 1925-07-19 1977 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 2001-08-21 2001-08-21 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 1931-05-16 1931-05-16 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 1929-08-01 1929-08-01 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta viridis Slippershell 1994-06-14 1994-06-14 T G4G5 S2S3 Animal Dendroica cerulea Cerulean warbler 1994-06-04 2009-04-27 T G4 S3 Animal Dendroica cerulea Cerulean warbler 2006-06-08 1995-06-03 T G4 S3 Animal Coregonus artedi Lake herring or Cisco 1948 1982 T G5 S3 Animal Bouteloua curtipendula Side-oats grama grass 2012-08-22 2012-05-18 E G5 S1 Plant Villosa fabalis Rayed bean 1965 2010-07-20 E E G2 S1 Animal Epioblasma triquetra Snuffbox 196? 2010-07-22 E E G3 S1 Animal

Table 2: Special Concern Species and other Rare Natural Features within 1.0 miles of RSR #1530

SNAME SCOMNAME FIRSTOBS LASTOBS USESA SPROT GRANK SRANK ELCAT Battus philenor Pipevine 1953 1986 SC G5 S1S2 Animal swallowtail Emydoidea blandingii Blanding's turtle 1997 1997-08-06 SC G4 S3 Animal Terrapene carolina Eastern box turtle 1970 1983 SC G5T5 S2S3 Animal carolina Prunus alleghaniensis Alleghany or Sloe 1986 1986-04-28 SC G4T3Q S3 Plant var. davisii plum Carex squarrosa Sedge 1986 1986 SC G4G5 S1 Plant Great Blue Heron Great Blue Heron 1989 1989 G5 SU Other Rookery Rookery Mesic Southern Forest Rich Forest, Central 1977 1981-11-04 G2G3 S3 Community Midwest Type Carex squarrosa Sedge 1981-07-14 1985-07-04 SC G4G5 S1 Plant Hybanthus concolor Green violet 1954 1954-05-20 SC G5 S3 Plant Pomatiopsis Brown walker 1952 1952-07-25 SC G4 SU Animal cincinnatiensis Pomatiopsis Brown walker 1955 1955 SC G4 SU Animal cincinnatiensis Papaipema beeriana Blazing star borer 1951 1952 SC G2G3 S1S2 Animal Celtis tenuifolia Dwarf hackberry 1973-09-01 1973-09-01 SC G5 S3 Plant Linum sulcatum Furrowed flax 1927 1927-09-21 SC G5 S2S3 Plant Nicrophorus americanus American burying 1917 1917-09-05 LE X G2G3 SH Animal beetle Eleocharis equisetoides Horsetail spike 1941 1941-07-12 SC G4 S3 Plant rush Papaipema Regal fern borer 1948 1951-09-30 SC G4 S2S3 Animal speciosissima Emydoidea blandingii Blanding's turtle 1986 1986-05-11 SC G4 S3 Animal Great Blue Heron Great Blue Heron 1987 1987-03-30 G5 SU Other Rookery Rookery Eleocharis geniculata Spike-rush 1934 1936-08-22 X G5 SX Plant Calephelis mutica Swamp metalmark 1934 1934 SC G3 S1S2 Animal Emydoidea blandingii Blanding's turtle 1997 1997-05-06 SC G4 S3 Animal Angelica venenosa Hairy angelica 1995 1995-08-02 SC G5 S3 Plant Wilsonia citrina Hooded warbler 1995 1995-06-08 SC G5 S3 Animal Celtis tenuifolia Dwarf hackberry 1973-09-03 1973-09-03 SC G5 S3 Plant Emydoidea blandingii Blanding's turtle 1978 1996-05-02 SC G4 S3 Animal Sistrurus catenatus Eastern 1906 1990-08-10 C SC G3G4T3T4Q S3S4 Animal catenatus massasauga Sistrurus catenatus Eastern 1978 2000-10-18 C SC G3G4T3T4Q S3S4 Animal catenatus massasauga Sistrurus catenatus Eastern 1991 1994 C SC G3G4T3T4Q S3S4 Animal catenatus massasauga Sistrurus catenatus Eastern 1927 1978-09-17 C SC G3G4T3T4Q S3S4 Animal catenatus massasauga Emydoidea blandingii Blanding's turtle 2002-05-16 2002-05-16 SC G4 S3 Animal Wilsonia citrina Hooded warbler 2002-06-13 2002-06-13 SC G5 S3 Animal Sistrurus catenatus Eastern 1995 1995-08 C SC G3G4T3T4Q S3S4 Animal catenatus massasauga Astragalus neglectus Cooper's milk vetch 1922 1922-06-14 SC G4 S3 Plant Angelica venenosa Hairy angelica 1956 1956-08-18 SC G5 S3 Plant Microtus pinetorum Woodland vole 1929 1929-07-07 SC G5 S3S4 Animal Eleocharis equisetoides Horsetail spike 1939 1939-08-28 SC G4 S3 Plant rush Noturus miurus Brindled madtom 1921-12-10 1942-04-05 SC G5 S2S3 Animal Prairie Fen Alkaline 1990 1991-11-04 G3 S2 Community Shrub/herb Fen, Midwest Type Villosa iris Rainbow 2001-06-14 2001-06-14 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Angelica venenosa Hairy angelica 1916 1916-07-22 SC G5 S3 Plant Catocala illecta Magdalen 1964 1978 SC G5 S2S3 Animal underwing Pleurobema sintoxia Round pigtoe 2000-2001 2000-2001 SC G4G5 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta marginata Elktoe 2000-2001 2000-2001 SC G4 S2S3 Animal Pleurobema sintoxia Round pigtoe 2000-2001 2000-2001 SC G4G5 S2S3 Animal Villosa iris Rainbow 2000-2001 2000-2001 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Noturus miurus Brindled madtom 1920-07-03 1977-07-25 SC G5 S2S3 Animal Noturus miurus Brindled madtom 1908-05-30 1931-11-20 SC G5 S2S3 Animal Noturus miurus Brindled madtom 1998-08-10 1998-08-10 SC G5 S2S3 Animal Villosa iris Rainbow 1994-06-14 2009-03-20 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Geum virginianum Pale avens 1983 1983-07-11 SC G5 S1S2 Plant Adlumia fungosa Climbing fumitory 1984 1984-07-25 SC G4 S3 Plant Pomatiopsis Brown walker 1942 1952-07-12 SC G4 SU Animal cincinnatiensis Noturus miurus Brindled madtom 1984 1984-08-15 SC G5 S2S3 Animal Noturus miurus Brindled madtom 1984 1984 SC G5 S2S3 Animal Terrapene carolina Eastern box turtle 1905 1905 SC G5T5 S2S3 Animal carolina Calephelis mutica Swamp metalmark 1932 1932 SC G3 S1S2 Animal Spiza americana Dickcissel 2006-06-05 2006-06-05 SC G5 S3 Animal Euonymus atropurpurea Wahoo 1998-06-13 1998-06-13 SC G5 S3 Plant Angelica venenosa Hairy angelica 1876 1876-08 SC G5 S3 Plant Liodessus cantralli Cantrall's bog 1952-07-30 1953-10-27 SC GNR S1S3 Animal beetle Oecanthus laricis Tamarack tree 1936 1939-08-03 SC G1G2 S1S2 Animal cricket Eleocharis equisetoides Horsetail spike 1941 1962-09-26 SC G4 S3 Plant rush Truncilla truncata Deertoe SC G5 SNR Animal Alasmidonta marginata Elktoe 1935 1996-1997 SC G4 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta marginata Elktoe 1994-06-15 2002-08-21 SC G4 S2S3 Animal Utterbackia imbecillis Paper pondshell 1931-05-14 1931-05-14 SC G5 SNR Animal Alasmidonta marginata Elktoe SC G4 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta marginata Elktoe 1937-07-02 2001-07-05 SC G4 S2S3 Animal Alasmidonta marginata Elktoe 1931-05-16 2008-07-31 SC G4 S2S3 Animal Ptychobranchus Kidney shell 1994-06-14 1994-06-23 SC G4G5 SNR Animal fasciolaris Ptychobranchus Kidney shell 1929 1992-08-12 SC G4G5 SNR Animal fasciolaris Pleurobema sintoxia Round pigtoe 1994-06-14 2002-08-21 SC G4G5 S2S3 Animal Pleurobema sintoxia Round pigtoe 1935-08 1996-1997 SC G4G5 S2S3 Animal Pleurobema sintoxia Round pigtoe 1926 2001-07-05 SC G4G5 S2S3 Animal Carex trichocarpa Hairy-fruited sedge 1874 1874-07-06 SC G4 S2 Plant Ventridens suppressus Flat dome 1937-08-05 1937-08-05 SC G5 SNR Animal Villosa iris Rainbow SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Villosa iris Rainbow 1925-07-19 2000-2001 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Villosa iris Rainbow 1927 1927 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Villosa iris Rainbow 1921 2001-07-05 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Villosa iris Rainbow 1918 1977 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Villosa iris Rainbow 1941-07-29 2001-07-25 SC G5Q S2S3 Animal Emydoidea blandingii Blanding's turtle 1997-05-27 2011-04-10 SC G4 S3 Animal Inundated Shrub Swamp Shrub Swamp, 2008 2011-06-06 G4 S3 Community Central Midwest Type Bog 2011-06-06 2011-06-06 G3G5 S4 Community Dry-mesic Southern 1995 2011-06-6 G4 S3 Community Forest Prairie Fen Alkaline 2011-08-22 2011-05-18 G3 S2 Community Shrub/herb Fen, Midwest Type Codes to accompany Tables 1 and 2:

State Protection Status Code Definitions (SPROT) E: Endangered T: Threatened SC: Special concern Global Heritage Status Rank Definitions (GRANK) The priority assigned by NatureServe's national office for data collection and protection based upon the element's status throughout its entire world-wide range. Criteria not based only on number of occurrences; other critical factors also apply. Note that ranks are frequently combined. G1 = critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences range-wide or very few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction. G2 = imperiled globally because of rarity (6 to 20 occurrences or few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extinction throughout its range. G3: Either very rare and local throughout its range or found locally (even abundantly at some of its locations) in a restricted range (e.g. a single western state, a physiographic region in the East) or because of other factor(s) making it vulnerable to extinction throughout its range; in terms of occurrences, in the range of 21 to 100. G4: Apparently secure globally, though it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially at the periphery. G5: Demonstrably secure globally, though it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially at the periphery. Q: Taxonomy uncertain

State Heritage Status Rank Definitions (SRANK) The priority assigned by the Michigan Natural Features Inventory for data collection and protection based upon the element's status within the state. Criteria not based only on number of occurrences; other critical factors also apply. Note that ranks are frequently combined. S1: Critically imperiled in the state because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation in the state. S2: Imperiled in state because of rarity (6 to 20 occurrences or few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the state. S3: Rare or uncommon in state (on the order of 21 to 100 occurrences). S4 = apparently secure in state, with many occurrences. S5 = demonstrably secure in state and essentially ineradicable under present conditions. SX = apparently extirpated from state. TELEPHONE CONTACT ET Rover Pipeline Project Rover Project

Date of Conversation: 10/2/14 Agency/Organization/Individual Contacted Rover Trail Project Representative John Yellich/Head of Michigan Ayla Heinze Fry/ TRC Name / Title: Name: Geological Survey Geologist Agency/ Office Michigan Geological Survey 650 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA Organization: Location: 269.387.8649 Phone Phone No.: 978.656.3526 [email protected] No.: Subject of Call: Location of Significant Fossils (Michigan) Follow-up: Cc: (via email)

Discussion:

Discuss with John ability to determine location of significant fossil findings near the project. He will forward my questions on to Peter Boyce and William Harrison who should be able to better help.

TRC Project No. 140119 1 of 1 Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission GENESEE ST CLAIR LAPEER SHIAWASSEE

!( Michigan Consolidated MS MACOMB

OAKLAND

LIVINGSTON

Pinckney State Recreation Area

Consumers Energy MS !( WASHTENAW USACE District Detroit Market Segment

LENAWEE

FULTON

USACE District Buffalo Defiance CS PEPL & ANR MS )"!( Mainline DEFIANCE HENRY WOOD

Basemap: Esri, 2014 Data Source: USGS Protected Areas Database, 2012; USACE Prepared by: SHEET 2 OF 2 AUGUST 2014

PUBLIC OFFICIAL OUTREACH Public Officials and Local Agencies Outreach

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Susan Douglass, Executive Director, Belmont Susan Douglass, Executive County Susan Director, Belmont County Department of Douglas, Department of Development, Executive Development, Community Community Director; and Improvement Corporation; 117 East Main Improvement OH 2/11/15 Belmont Melanie St. Clairsville 10:00 AM Gretchen Krueger Melanie Blacker, Personal Street Corporation; Blacker, Trust Account Melanie Blacker, Personal Trust Administrator, The Personal Trust Account Huntington Trust, Account Administrator Huntington National Bank Administrator, The Huntington Trust, Huntington National Bank Belmont, Noble & Monroe OFB Mark Wilson, County Board Dominic Volpe, Betsy Anderson – OFB members, AG Cheryl Bratz, Sue District Director OFB District 100 Colonel Extension Roberts, Joel OH 2/11/15 Belmont Barnesville F2F; 1pm Sect: Sherry Director Drive Agents, Soil & Moore, Mark 740-425-3681 Water Liston, Angela Conservation Snyder Agents, Dale Gretchen Krueger Arnold Wayne, Ashland Mark Wilson, & Stark OFB Gretchen County Board Krueger, Mark John Fitzpatrick - OFB members, AG Roberts, Mark District Director OFB District Extension OH 2/11/15 Wayne Location TBD Wooster 7pm Liston, Cheryl Director Agents, Soil & Bratz, Sue 330-263-7456 Water Roberts, Jim Conservation Burns, Angela Agents, Dale Snyder Arnold Washington/ State 125B, East Stop by PA 2/10/2015 Smith Rep. Jason Ortitay Harrisburg Bryan Lowe Representative Wing meeting Township

Page 1 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Gretchen Supervisors Tom Krueger, Dominic Washington/ 1848 Smith 2 - 3 p.m. Schilinski, Volpe, Sharon PA 2/10/2015 Smith Township Supervisors Members Township State Slovan stop by Anthony Carter, Daniel Township Road meeting Gianfrancesco & Dew & Vanessa Tim Green Getz Gretchen Krueger, Dominic Washington/ 4:30 - 5:30 Supervisors 11 Municipal Volpe, Sharon PA 2/10/2015 Hanover Township Supervisors Members Burgettstown p.m. stop Kevin Lemmi & Drive Carter, Daniel Township by meeting Herb Grubbs Dew & Vanessa Getz State MI 2/10/2015 Livingston Rep. Lana Theis N/A N/A F2F MHSA N/A Representative Commissioners David Testa, Eric Vincent, Charles Smith, WV 2/10/2015 Tyler Commissioners 225 Main St. Middlebourne 9:00 AM Vincent, Smith, Sharon Carter, John Stender Stender Daniel Dew State MI 2/5/2015 Livingston Rep. Frank Vaupel N/A N/A F2F MHSA N/A Representative Mike Sibberson, Gretchen 1 Courthouse Bowling OH 2/5/2015 Wood Co. Mike Sibberson Auditor Conf Call (Karen Young - Krueger, Megan Sq. 5th Flr Green Wood Co) McKavanagh Commissioners Wirkner, Ohler, Robert Wirkner, Jeffrey 119 South Stop by OH 2/5/2015 Carroll Co. Commissioners Carrollton Wheaton & Christopher Wolf Ohler, Thomas Wheaton Lisbon St meeting Janice Leggett Co. Clerk Commissioners Chris Abbuhl, Kerry 125 East High New Stop by OH 2/5/2015 Tuscarawas Commissioners Abbduhl, Christopher Wolf Metzger, Belle Everett Avenue Philadelphia meeting Metzger, Everett Commissioners Don Bethel, William Host, 100 West Stop by OH 2/5/2015 Harrison Co Commissioners Cadiz Bethel, Host, Christopher Wolf Dale Norris Market St meeting Norris Township St. Clair MI 2/3/2015 St. Clair Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials County Township Berlin MI 2/3/2015 St. Clair Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Left voice Township Riley MI 2/3/2015 St. Clair Township Officials N/A mail MRG N/A Officials Township message Left voice Township Columbus MI 2/3/2015 St. Clair Township Officials N/A mail MRG N/A Officials Township message Township St. Clair MI 2/3/2015 St. Clair Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township

Page 2 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Township China MI 2/3/2015 St. Clair Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township East China MI 2/3/2015 St. Clair Township Officials N/A phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Macomb MI 2/3/2015 Macomb Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials County Township Richmond MI 2/3/2015 Macomb Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Hadley MI 2/3/2015 Lapeer Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Elba MI 2/3/2015 Lapeer Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Lapeer Left MI 2/3/2015 Lapeer Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Attica Left MI 2/3/2015 Lapeer Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Imlay MI 2/3/2015 Lapeer Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Almont Left MI 2/3/2015 Lapeer Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Oakland Left MI 2/3/2015 Oakland Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials County message Township Holly Left voice MI 2/3/2015 Oakland Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township mail Township Groveland Phone with MI 2/3/2015 Oakland Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township Supervisor. Township Argentine MI 2/3/2015 Genesee Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Fenton Left MI 2/3/2015 Genesee Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Mundy Left MI 2/3/2015 Genesee Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Grand Blanc Left MI 2/3/2015 Genesee Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Atlas MI 2/3/2015 Genesee Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Burns MI 2/3/2015 Shiawassee Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Livingston Left MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials county message Township Putnam MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Marion MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township

Page 3 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Township Iosco MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Handy MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Howell Left MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Cococtah MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Village of MI 2/3/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A Email MRG N/A Officials Pickney Township Left MI 2/3/2015 Lenawee Township Officials N/A Lenawee MRG N/A Officials message Township Seneca MI 2/3/2015 Lenawee Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Dover MI 2/3/2015 Lenawee Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Madison MI 2/3/2015 Lenawee Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Adrian MI 2/3/2015 Lenawee Township Officials N/A Phone MRG N/A Officials Township Township Franklin Left MI 2/3/2015 Lenawee Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Left MI 2/3/2015 Washtenaw Township Officials N/A Washtenaw MRG N/A Officials message Township Manchester Met with MI 2/3/2015 Washtenaw Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township today Township Bridgewater Left MI 2/3/2015 Washtenaw Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Freedom Left MI 2/3/2015 Washtenaw Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Lima Left MI 2/3/2015 Washtenaw Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Township Dexter Left MI 2/3/2015 Washtenaw Township Officials N/A MRG N/A Officials Township message Commissioners: Henry Co. T. VonDeylan, G. Miller, R. 1853 Oakwood T. VonDeylan, G. OH 2/3/2015 Commission Commissioners Napoleon phone call Susan King Hastedt Ave. Miller, R. Hastedt ers - Q/A Richland Co 50 Park Ave. OH 2/2/2015 Commission Tim Wert Commissioner Mansfield phone call Tim Wert - Q/A - Susan King East er Gretchen Emergency Responder EMA Director Jeff Krueger; Mark WV 1/30/15 Washington TBD TBD 2pm Meeting Yates Ryan; Angela Snyder

Page 4 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

EMA Director Emergency Responder WV 1/30/15 Marshall TBD TBD N/A Tom Hart/Dep Dir Meeting Mike Mucheck Manchester Manchester Township Manchester MI 1/30/2015 Washtenaw Township N/A F2F MRG N/A Officials Township Officials 1196 County rd Trustee, Rick OH 1/30/2015 Milton Rick Emmons Trustee Ashland email Jim Burns 1356 Emmons OH 1/30/2015 Montgomery Michael Welch Fiscal Officer 1527 CR 995 Ashland phone call Michael Welch Jim Burns OH 1/30/2015 Vermillion Amy Pickering Fiscal Officer 891 CR 1904 Ashland phone call Amy Pickering Jim Burns OH 1/30/2015 Mohican Jody Barter Fiscal Officer 1761 TR 85 Jeromesville phone call Jody Barter Jim Burns Gretchen EMA/LEPC Emergency Responder Krueger; Mark WV 1/29/15 Doddridge 600 6th Street Moundsville 9am Coordinator Pat Meeting Ryan; Angela Heaster Snyder Gretchen 48535 EMA Director Noble Emergency Responder Krueger; Mark OH 1/29/15 Coldwater Caldwell 9am Chastity County Meeting Ryan; Angela Creek Road Schmelzenbach Snyder Gretchen Emergency Responder EMA Director Pat Krueger; Mark WV 1/29/15 Tyler TBD TBD 4pm Meeting Heaster Ryan; Angela Snyder Gretchen Emergency Responder EMA Director Phil Krueger; Mark OH 1/29/15 Monroe TBD TBD 10:30am Meeting Keevert Ryan; Angela Snyder Trustees Chester Nagel, Jack Franklin, Franklin, Schleisser and Paint, Plain, Paint, Plain, Daryle Rogers; OH 1/29/2015 Salt Creek, Townships Trustees vary email Jim Burns Salt Creek, Clerk James Wooster Wooster Daman; and Larry Townships Marckel Sr, zoning Pike, Pike, those with email OH 1/29/2015 Bethlehem, Townships Trustees vary Bethlehem, email Jim Burns addresses Sugar Creek Sugar Creek Tom Barnabei,Janet Weir 110 Central OH 1/29/2015 Stark Commissioners Canton email Commissioners Jim Burns Creighton, Richard Regula Plaza South OH 1/29/2015 Wooster Matthew Ogden Trustee 838 Heyl Rd Wooster email Matthew Ogden Jim Burns Commissioners Ann Orbrecht, Jim 428 W. Liberty Orbrecht, OH 1/29/2015 Wayne Co. Commissioners Wooster email Jim Burns Carmichael, Scott Wiggam St Carmichael, Wiggam

Page 5 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Crawford Co 112 E Commissioner OH 1/29/2015 Commission Barbara Leethold Co. Clerk Bucyrus 2:00 PM Susan King Mansfield St Vermillion ers Office Joel Moore, Jefferson Gretchen David Maple, Co. Krueger, Dominic OH 1/29/2015 Tom Gentile Commissioner 301 Market St. Steubenville 9:00 AM Thomas Gentile, Commission Volpe, Mike Thomas Graham ers Eichner, Dave Thomas Richland Co. 50 Park Ave. Eng. Jim OH 1/29/2015 Commission stop by -referred to Co. Eng Co. Eng. Office Mansfield 11:30 AM Susan King East Lichtenwalter ers EMA Director Gretchen 106 Emergency Responder Tom Cottis/LEPC Krueger; Mark OH 1/28/15 Carroll Kensington Carrolton 9am Meeting Director Tammy Ryan; Angela Road NE Dowdell Snyder Gretchen Emergency Responder EMA Director Krueger; Mark OH 1/28/15 Belmont TBD TBD 4pm Meeting Dave Ivan Ryan; Angela Snyder Gretchen Emergency Responder 300 Airport LEPC Director Krueger; Mark OH 1/28/15 Jefferson Wintersville 2pm Meeting Road Rob Herrington Ryan; Angela Snyder Gretchen Emergency Responder 538 North Main EMA Director Krueger; Mark OH 1/28/15 Harrison Cadiz 1pm Meeting Street, Suite F Lorna Bower Ryan; Angela Snyder Belmont Co. Matt Coffland, Ginny 101 West Main Stop by OH 1/28/2015 Commission Commissioners St. Clairsville provided packets Joel Moore Favede, Mark Thomas st. meeting ers/Clerk Gretchen 112 E. Emergency Responder EMA Director Tim Krueger; Mark OH 1/27/15 Crawford Mansfield Bucyrus 9am Meeting Flock Ryan; Angela Street Snyder Gretchen EMA Director Tim Emergency Responder 4500 Atlantic Krueger; Mark OH 1/27/15 Stark Canton 4pm Warstler/LEPC Meeting Blvd NE Ryan; Angela Don McDonald Snyder Gretchen Emergency Responder 201 W. North EMA Director Joe Krueger; Mark OH 1/27/15 Wayne Wooster 2:30pm Meeting Street Villegas Ryan; Angela Snyder

Page 6 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Gretchen Emergency Responder EMA Director Krueger; Mark OH 1/27/15 Ashland TBD TBD 1pm Meeting Mark Rafeld Ryan; Angela Snyder EMA Director Gretchen Emergency Responder 597 Park Mike Bailey/LEPC Krueger; Mark OH 1/27/15 Richland Mansfield 10:30am Meeting Avenue East Director Rick Ryan; Angela Evans Snyder Gretchen Wood Co. Krueger, Mark Wood Co Commissioners, County 1 Courthouse Bowling Roberts, Mark OH 1/27/2015 Commission Andrew Kalmar 9:30 AM Auditor, Administrator Sq. 5th Flr Green Wilson, Stacy ers Treasurer, McCurdy, David Administrator Hahn, Susan King Henry Co. Commissioners: 1853 Oakwood Joey Mathias, OH 1/27/2015 Commission Lisa Sugg Co. Clerk Napoleon 1:30 PM T. VonDeylan, G. Ave Susan King ers Miller, R. Hastedt Chesterfield Stop by Paul Holman, Jim OH 1/26/2015 Paul Holman, Jim Stubbins Trustees Jeremy Heyerly Township meeting Stubbins Michael Welsh, Phil Leibolt, OH 1/26/2015 Ashland Co Commissioners 110 Cottage St Ashland email Commissioners Jim Burns Barbara Queer German Stop by Randy Ruffer, OH 1/26/2015 Randy Ruffer, Bruce Lauber Trustees 5001 St. Rt 66 Archibold Jeremy Heyerly Township meeting Bruce Lauber Township Supervisor Al Township Township MI 1/16/2015 St. Clair N/A Riley Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Titus Supervisor Supervisor Township Township MI 1/16/2015 St. Clair Followup on Board Meeting N/A China Twp Follow-up MRG Field Rep Officials Officials Township Supervisor Larry Township East China Township MI 1/16/2015 St. Clair N/A F2F MRG Field Rep Simmons Supervisor Twp Supervisor Township Supervisor Bill Township Township MI 1/16/2015 Ionia N/A Berlin Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Winn Supervisor Supervisor Township Clerk Brenda Cohoctah Township MI 1/16/2015 Livingston Township Clerk N/A F2F MRG Field Rep Meek Twp Supervisor Deputy Township Brent Township MI 1/16/2015 Livingston Deputy Twp N/A Handy Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Kilpela Supervisor Township Zoning Zoning Township MI 1/16/2015 Livingston N/A Howell Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Administrator Bill Call Administrator Supervisor Township Township MI 1/16/2015 Livingston Township Officials N/A Marion Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Officials Officials Township Washtenaw Township MI 1/16/2015 Washtenaw Micah Morris N/A F2F MRG Field Rep Officials County Officials Wood County (Ohio) Stone Ridge David Hahn, Mark Wood Invited by Ray Annual county/township Golf Club - Bowling Rogers, Stacy OH 1/15/15 County 6-8:30pm Huber, Wood winter meeting of all county 1553 Muirfield Green McCurdy, Township County engineer elected officials Drive Gretchen Krueger

Page 7 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Mark Roberts, Gretchen Crawford Crawford County 112 East Crawford Crawford County Krueger, Stacy OH 1/14/15 10:30 AM County Commissioners Mansfield St County Commissioners McCurdy, David Hahn and Mark Wilson Gretchen Krueger, Seth Willoughby, Mark Drain MI 1/13/15 Lansing MI Drain Commissioners 3:30pm Lansing Meeting Wilson (Land commissioners Stewards); other Rover project team members Gretchen Krueger, Seth Michigan Department of Willoughby, Ag and Rural MI 1/13/15 Lansing Agriculture and Rural 1pm Lansing 3:30pm Dominic Volpe, Development Development Pete Danley, Mike Lavallee, and Mark Wilson Mark Roberts, Trustees Chester Mark Manuel, Nagel, Jack Gretchen Schleisser and Krueger, Ty Adams 3592 Adams Daryle Rogers; OH 1/12/15 Adams Township Meeting Defiance 7:30pm Heckman, Stacy Township Ridge Road Clerk James McCurdy and Daman; and Larry Robert Moore Marckel Sr, with Land zoning Stewards Township Township MI 1/7/2015 Genesee Shirley Kautman-Jones N/A Atlas Twp Phone MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor MI 1/7/2015 Genesee Office Staff Office Staff N/A Mundy Twp Phone Office Staff MRG Field Rep Township Township MI 1/7/2015 Genesee Micki Hoffman N/A Grand Blanc Phone MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor Township Township MI 1/7/2015 Oakland Dave Ax N/A Groveland Phone MRG Field Rep Treasurer Treasurer Dale Smith, Township Code Enforcement Officer; Roger Township Township MI 1/7/2015 Oakland Welsh, Deputy Supervisor N/A Holly Phone MRG Field Rep Officials Officials and Township Clerk Karin Winchester Township Township MI 1/7/2015 Oakland Dave Ax N/A Groveland Phone MRG Field Rep Treasurer Treasurer Township Township MI 1/6/2015 Lapeer Paul Bowman N/A Almont Twp Phone MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor

Page 8 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Township Township MI 1/6/2015 Lapeer Scott Jarvis N/A Lapeer Twp Phone MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor Township Township MI 1/6/2015 Lapeer Mike Boskee N/A Elba Twp Phone MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor Township Township MI 1/6/2015 Lapeer Chris Tippen N/A Hadley Twp Phone MRG Field Rep Treasurer Treasurer Township Supervisor Linda Township Township MI 1/5/2015 St. Clair N/A China Twp Phone MRG Field Rep Schweihofer Supervisor Supervisor Local Office Staff and Office East China MI 1/5/2015 St. Clair Township Staff N/A Phone Township Staff MRG Field Rep Manager Twp Columbus MI 1/5/2015 St. Clair Pat Iseler, Township Clerk Township Clerk N/A Phone Township Clerk MRG Field Rep Twp MI 1/5/2015 St. Clair Joyce Skonieczny Township Clerk N/A St. Clair Phone Township Clerk MRG Field Rep Township Township MI 1/5/2015 St. Clair Bill Winn N/A Berlin Phone MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor Township Township MI 1/5/2015 Macomb Cynthia Greenia N/A Richmond Phone MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor Larry Richardson, James Koehn, Madison Madison Twp elected 4008 S. Adrian Dover Twp MI 12/17/14 Adrian 10:00 AM Gretchen Krueger Twp officials Hwy. supervisor, Seneca Twp John Gould - with MRG

Page 9 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Don Hamann – Dover Township Trustee Dan Borck – Dover Township Trustee Larry Richardson – Madison Tom Shields Charter Township (MRG) Supervisor Dover, Gretchen Krueger John Gould – 12/17/201 Township Madison, (ET) MI Lenawee Township Officials Meeting N/A F2F Seneca Township 4 Officials Seneca, Tim Aben (MRG) Supervisor Adrian Micah Morris James Koehn – (Land Agent) Adrian Township Chad Thomas Supervisor Janet Bovee – Madison Charter Township Treasurer Arnold Harper – Madison Charter Township Clerk 12/17/201 Township Township MI Lenawee Terri Moore N/A Franklin Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Treasurer Treasurer County Administration Joey Mahmoud, Macomb Macomb County Building Mount Macomb County MI 12/16/14 9am Mark Vedral, County Commissioners Meeting 1 S. Main Clemens Commissioners Gretchen Krueger Street, 9th Floor 12/12/201 Township Township MI Livingston Ron Rau N/A Putnam Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Supervisor Supervisor Gretchen Cong Miller's Krueger, Mark Macomb U.S. Cong Candice Miller 48701 Van MI 12/11/14 Shelby Twp 11:30 AM Staff, led by Don Vedral, Albert County District Staff Dyke Ave Brown Knoll, Seth Willoughby FERC Mark Roberts, Landowner Rob Rettig Henry K402 County Commissioners, Land Stewards, OH 12/11/14 Farm with Henry County Napoleon 9am County Road 14 Henry Co. Rover Project Commissioners Commissioners Team members 12/11/201 Township MI St. Clair Julia Rust Twp Treasurer N/A China Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Treasurer

Page 10 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

12/11/201 Township East China Township MI St. Clair Larry Simmons N/A F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Supervisor Twp Supervisor 12/11/201 Columbus MI St. Clair Pat Iseler, Township Clerk Township Clerk N/A F2F Township Clerk MRG Field Rep 4 Twp 12/11/201 Township Township MI St. Clair Bill Winn N/A Berlin Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Supervisor Supervisor Twp Supervisor Ron Rau, Twp Treasuer Pat Livingston Carney, Twp MI 12/9/14 Putnam Township 3280 W. M-36 Pinckney 9:00 AM Gretchen Krueger County Clerk Sally Guyon, MRG representatives, Micah Morris Lapeer 1500Morris Donna H, Ron G MI 12/8/14 Lapeer County Supervisors Lapeer Meeting Gretchen Krueger County Road from MRG Sarah Hubbard - Michigan Chamber of Acuitas; Tom MI 12/8/14 Lansing 600 S Walnut Lansing Meeting Gretchen Krueger Commerce Shield and Donna Halinski, MRG Jefferson County Township Mingo K of C, Jefferson Mingo OH 12/6/14 Association President Terry 117 Legion 5:30PM Dominic Volpe County Junction Bell Drive Heidelberg Seneca County University Township Seneca County Township OH 12/4/14 Jackson Campus Fostoria 6pm Trustees N/A Trustee Association Center – Great Kyle Keesy – Hall, 1st Floor SPP Jackson Township Trustee Jackson Township Trustee Jackson OH 12/4/14 Jackson TBD 11am Paul Carrier Gretchen Krueger Paul Carrier Township Jonathan Petrea – SPP Henry County Commissioners Bob Hastedt, Tom VonDeylen, Henry County 1852 Oakwood OH 12/3/14 Henry Napoleon 9:30AM and Glenn Miller; Gretchen Krueger Commissioners Ave Ken Collins and Kyle Keesy– SPP. County EMS Director.

Page 11 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments Freight 300 Martin Committee Toledo Metropolitan Area OH 12/3/14 Lucas Luther King JR Toledo 12:30PM Members. Gretchen Krueger Council of Governments Drive TMACOG Transportation Planner Roger Streiffert, Ken Collins and Kyle Keesy, SPP. Defiance County Commissioners Otto Nicely, Thomas Kime, James Harris. Defiance County Economic Defiance County 500 Court OH 12/2/14 Defiance Defiance 9:00AM Director Jerry Gretchen Krueger Commissioners Street Hayes, Defiance Recorder Cecila Parsons, Ken Collins and Kyle Keesy– SPP, Mark Wilson – Land Stewards Defiance Mayor Bob Armstrong, Defiance Engineer Lee Rausch, Economic City of Defiance Mayor Bob 631 Perry OH 12/2/14 Defiance Defiance 10:00AM Development Dir. Gretchen Krueger Armstrong Street Jerry Hayes, Ken Collins and Kyle Keesy – SPP, Mark Wilson – Land Stewards. Mayor’s staff. Ohio Department of Transportation - RUMA OH 11/25/14 Guernsey TBD Cambridge TBD Art Arnold Dominic Volpe (road use maintenance agreement) Meeting

Page 12 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Ohio State University’s Columbus/Au Grant Ruckel - OH 11/25/14 Franklin Subsurface Energy TBD Webinar Art Arnold stin presenting Resource Center Twp supervisors Shirley Jones, Bonnie Mathis, Rob Cole, Micki Genesee MI 11/20/14 Township supervisors Meeting Hoffman and Gretchen Krueger County Dave Arceo; MRG - Tom Shields and Ron Gillett Richland County Leon Banta or Richland County Township 750 N. Home Township Trustee Seth Willoughby OH 11/20/14 Richland Trustee Association Rd. Mansfield, Mansfield 6:00 PM Association and Gretchen Meeting OH 44906 Meeting Krueger Lima Township Supervisor Township Township Gretchen Krueger MI 11/19/14 Washtenaw N/A Lima Twp F2F Craig Maier Supervisor Supervisor MRG Field Rep Henry County Commissioners 1853 Oakwood OH 11/18/14 Henry Rover/ SPP Napoléon 11:30am Bob Hastedt and N/A Ave Glenn Miller Kyle Keesy - SPP 11/18/201 Township Township MI Mundy Dave Guigear N/A Mundy Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Supervisor Supervisor 11/18/201 Township Township MI St. Clair Al Titus N/A Riley Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Supervisor Supervisor Stark County Commissioner Richard Regula, Congressman 303 Weirich Bob Gibbs District OH 11/17/14 Stark Massillon Rotary Club Massillon 10am N/A Blvd. Director Dallas Gerber, Judge Eduard Elam, SPP- Jonathan Petrea 11/17/201 Washtenaw Township Township MI Craig Maier N/A Lima Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 County Supervisor Supervisor Wood County Commissioner OH 11/14/14 Wood Rover/ SPP By phone 11am N/A Joel Kuhlman Kyle Keesy - SPP

Page 13 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Washington/ 11/14/201 Rep. Jim Christiana, Josh State 145B, East PA Hanover Harrisburg email Bryan Lowe 4 Konecheck Representative Wing Township Gretchen City of Wooster Mayor Bob 538 N. Market Jonathan Petrea - OH 11/13/14 Wayne Wooster 2pm Krueger, Mark Breneman St SPP Ryan OMA's Energy Committee includes Honda, AK Steel, US Ohio Manufacturers’ Steel, Budweiser, Gretchen 33 North High OH 11/13/14 Franklin Association Energy Columbus 11:00 AM Husky Energy's Krueger, Mark Street 6th Floor Committee Lima Refinery, Ryan Potash Corp among other heavy users of energy. Ron Rau (Supervisor), 11/13/201 Livingston Township Sally Guyon MI Township Officials N/A Putnam Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 County Officials (Clerk), Pat Carney (Treasurer) 11/13/201 Livingston MI Dan Delmerico Clerk N/A Iosco Twp F2F Township Clerk MRG Field Rep 4 County 11/13/201 Livingston MI Tammy Beal Clerk N/A Marion Twp F2F Township Clerk MRG Field Rep 4 County 11/13/201 Township Township MI Lapeer Ernest Monroe N/A Hadley Twp F2F MRG Field Rep 4 Supervisor Supervisor Lapeer County-wide Lapeer MI 11/12/14 N/A TBD 7pm TBD TBD meeting County Michigan Governor Rick Valerie Brater, Joey Mahmoud, Snyder's staff: Deputy Legal 111 S Capitol Grant Ruckel, MI 11/12/14 Ingham Valerie Brater, Deputy Lansing 4pm Counsel and Ave Leon Banta, Seth Legal Counsel and Senior Senior Policy Willoughby Policy Advisor Advisor

Page 14 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Chairman John Quackenbush, Commissioner Greg White, Commissioner Sally Talberg, Cathy Cole, Executive Advisor to Chairman Quackenbush Pat Poli, Executive Advisor to Commissioner White Susana Joey Mahmoud, 4300 W. Woolcock, Michigan Public Service Seth Willoughby MI 11/12/14 Ingham Saginaw Lansing 2pm Executive Advisor Commission and Gretchen Highway to Commissioner Krueger Talberg Mike O'Brien, Chief of Staff Gary Kitts, Executive Director Mike Byrne, Legislative Liaison Brian Ballinger, Director of Operations & Wholesale Markets Division Dave Chislea, Manager of Gas Operations Commerce Dept Director Andre 77 South High Porter, Asst Ohio Department of OH 11/12/14 Franklin Street 23rd Columbus 1pm Director Fred Buffy Thomason Commerce Floor Miller, Senior Policy Advisor Sonni Peterson Township Freedom Township Township Gretchen Krueger MI 11/11/14 Washtenaw N/A Freedom Twp F2F Supervisor Dale Supervisor Dale Weidmayer Supervisor MRG Field Rep Weidmayer Manchester Township Township Manchester Township Gretchen Krueger MI 11/11/14 Washtenaw N/A F2F Supervisor Gene DeRossett Supervisor Twp Supervisor MRG Field Rep Bridgewater Township Township Bridgewater Township Gretchen Krueger MI 11/11/14 Washtenaw N/A F2F Supervisor Ron Smith Supervisor Twp Supervisor MRG Field Rep

Page 15 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Dexter Township Incoming Township Township Gretchen Krueger MI 11/11/14 Washtenaw N/A Dexter Twp F2F Supervisor Harley Rider Supervisor Supervisor MRG Field Rep Tyler County Commissioners John Stender, Tyler County WV 11/11/14 Tyler N/A Middlebourne 10:30am Charles Smith, N/A Commissioners and Eric Vincent Jared Bedekovich - SPP 301 Harding Jonathan Petrea OH 11/11/14 Crawford Galion Auditor Brian Trisch Gallion 11:45 N/A Way – SPP Galion Crestline Chamber 106 Harding Jonathan Petrea OH 11/11/14 Crawford Gallion 11:45 N/A President Joe Kleinknecht Way East – SPP Supervisor, Micki Township Hoffman and MI 11/8/2014 Genesee Township Officials N/A Grand Blanc F2F MRG Field Rep Officials Clerk, Cris Rariden Township Township MI 11/8/2014 Genesee David Guigear N/A Mundy Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor’s Assistant, Township MI 11/8/2014 Lapeer N/A Attica Twp F2F Township Official MRG Field Rep Maureen Lemons Official Township Township MI 11/8/2014 Oakland Supervisor, Dale Smith N/A Holly Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Officials Supervisor Administrative Assistant, Township Argentine MI 11/8/2014 Genesee N/A F2F Township Official MRG Field Rep Leslie Officials Twp Township Groveland Township MI 11/8/2014 Oakland Bob DePalma N/A F2F MRG Field Rep Officials Twp Supervisor Lapeer - Supervisor, Steve Lapeer - MI 11/7/14 N/A N/A MRG N/A Imlay Twp Hoeksema Imlay Twp Genesee - Genesee - MI 11/7/14 Intro to Supervisor N/A N/A MRG N/A Grand Blanc Grand Blanc Lapeer - Lapeer - MI 11/7/14 Intro to Supervisor N/A N/A MRG N/A Attica Twp Attica Twp Genesee - Genesee - MI 11/7/14 Intro to Supervisor N/A N/A MRG N/A Atlas Atlas Doddridge County Commissioners County Commission: Shirley Williams, Shirley Williams WV 11/7/14 Doddridge N/A West Union 10:00AM Ralph Sandora, N/A Ralph Sandora Gregory Gregory Robinson Robinson Jared Bedekovich - SPP

Page 16 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

State Rep. Mark Stark Romanchuk, Jeff Leon Banta and Meeting in Rover HQ, North 7100 Whipple OH 11/7/14 County, Ohio North Canton 1:00 PM Gorman, Bridget North Canton HQ Canton Avenue - Rover HQ McDaniel, Dave staff Eichinger Township Township MI 11/7/2014 Lapeer Steve Hoeksema N/A Imlay Twp F2F MRG Field Rep Supervisor Supervisor 101 N. Main St. Jonathan Petrea OH 11/5/14 Monroe County Recorder Ann Block Woodsfield 3pm Gretchen Krueger Room – SPP Monroe County 101 N. Main St. Jonathan Petrea Gretchen Krueger OH 11/5/14 Monroe Woodsfield 2pm Commissioner Carl Davis Room 12 – SPP ET Hosted by the Cambridge Area Chamber Cambridge Area of Commerce-Energy 2000 E. Chamber of OH 11/5/14 Guernsey Cambridge 11:30 A.M. Gretchen Kruger Development Issues Wheeling Ave. Commerce and Briefing the Ohio Farm Bureau Wetzel Chamber President Don Wetzel County Chamber of New WV 11/5/14 Wetzel N/A 10:30am Riggenbach N/A Commerce Martinsville Jared Bedekovich - SPP Attendees – non- ETP: Wetzel County Commissioner Wetzel County New WV 11/5/14 Wetzel N/A 10:00AM Lawrence Lemon, N/A Commissions Martinsville Donald Mason, Bob Gorby Jared Bedekovich - SPP Monroe County Engineer 47026 Monroe Jonathan Petrea Gretchen Krueger OH 11/5/14 Monroe Woodsfield 3:15 Lonny Tustin Ridge Road – SPP ET Jonathan Petrea – SPP, Richland County Richland Richland County 50 Park Ave E, Commissioners OH 11/4/14 Mansfield 10:30 AM N/A County Commissioners Mansfield Wert and Utt, Richland County Sanitary Engineer Steve Risser.

Page 17 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Jonathan Petrea – SPP, Wooster Wooster Township Trustee Township David Hahn; OH 10/30/14 Wayne 838 Heyl Road Wooster 3:30pm Steve Miller Trustees Steve Stacy McCurdy Miller and Matt Ogden Jonathan Petrea – SPP, Wayne Wayne County County 428 West David Hahn, OH 10/30/14 Wayne Commissioner Ann Wooster 1pm Commissioners Liberty St Stacy McCurdy Obrechrt and SWCD Staff Rob Kastner and Duane Wood. Rover Jonathan Petrea, Representative - Wayne County Chamber of Wayne County Leon Banta or 377 West OH 10/30/14 Wayne Commerce President Justin Wooster 11am Chamber Seth Willoughby Liberty St Starlin President Justin with construction, Starlin plus Gretchen Kruger Mayor Linda New McNeil, Jared WV 10/30/14 Hancock Town of New Cumberland N/A 10am N/A Cumberland Bedekovich - SPP Flood Plain Manager John Hancock County New WV 10/30/14 Hancock N/A 10:30am Jones, Jared N/A Emergency Management Cumberland Bedekovich - SPP County Clerk New George Foley, WV 10/30/14 Hancock County Clerk N/A 10:00AM N/A Cumberland Jared Bedekovich - SPP Richland Richland County Recorder 50 Park Ave E, Jonathan Petrea OH 10/30/14 Mansfield 10:30 AM N/A County Sarah Davis Mansfield – SPP MI 10/28/14 Lapeer TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD County Commissioners Jared Bedekovich WV 10/28/14 Tyler John Stender, Charles 225 Main St. Middlebourne 10:00AM n/a - SPP Smith and Eric Vincent Dale Williams, Carroll 43 2nd Street Jonathan Petrea OH 10/27/14 Carroll Carrolton 11:20 AM N/A County Sheriff SE – SPP 600 7th Street Jared Bedekovich WV 10/23/14 Marshall County Clerk Jan Pest Moundsville 10am N/A Suite 106 - SPP

Page 18 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

County Administrator Betsy 600 7th Street Jared Bedekovich WV 10/23/14 Marshall Frohnapfel Moundsville 10:30AM N/A Suite 106 - SPP

Tuscarawas Township 8831 Crooked Jonathan Petrea OH 10/23/14 Tuscarawas Ragersville 6:30 PM N/A Association Run Road SW – SPP Hancock Co. Commission 102 N. Court New WV 10/23/14 Hancock 2:30 PM ET Rep. TBD Meeting St. Cumberland Tuscarawas Tuscarawas County Not County Township OH 10/23/14 Tuscarawas Township Trustee specified by Trustee SPP Contact Association Meeting SPP Association Meeting Wetzel County Commissioners 303 Main New Jared Bedekovich WV 10/22/14 Wetzel County Commissioners 10:30am Lawrence Lemon Street Martinsville - SPP and Donald Mason Wetzel County 303 Main New Jared Bedekovich WV 10/22/14 Wetzel Wetzel Co. Clerk 10:00 AM Clerk Carol Street Martinsville - SPP Haught Canada Open MI 10/21/14 TBD Canada Open House TBD TBD TBD House Wayne County Engineers 3151 W Old Jonathan Petrea - OH 10/21/14 Wayne Wooster N/A N/A Office Lincoln Way SPP 538 N. Market Jonathan Petrea - OH 10/21/14 Wayne City of Wooster Wooster N/A N/A St SPP 112 East OH 10/21/14 Crawford Crawford County EMA Bucyrus N/A Tim Flock Jonathan Petrea Mansfield St

Page 19 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

All members were present except for Supervisor Dave Duerr and Planning Commission Member William Zickefoose. Fire Hanover Township Hanover Chief Michael Vanessa DeSalvo PA 10/21/14 Washington Commissioner/Planning 7:30-9pm Township Morra and Getz Meeting President of the VFD Ron Riter were in attendance. There was also a citizen there named Bill Schramm Wetzel County Wetzel County Chamber of New Chamber of Jared Bedekovich WV 10/21/14 Wetzel 201 Main St. 1pm Commerce Martinsville Commerce Don - SPP Riggenbach Planning Board Members Dave Neely, Bryan Beyerbach, Ted Shiska & Michael Morra; Township Craig Washington/ 7:30 - 9:00 11 Municipal Supervisors Wurtzbacher, PA 10/21/14 Hanover Planning Meeting Members Burgettstown p.m. stop Drive Kevin Lemmi & Dominic Volpe & Township by meeting Herb Grubbs; Fire Vanessa Getz Chief Michael Morra, VFD President Ron Riter and Citizen Bill Schramm OH Farm Bureau OH Farm Bureau Pipeline 1509 Co Hwy OH 10/20/14 Jefferson Bloomingdale 7:00 PM Pipeline Issues Issues Briefing 22A Briefing Atlas Township Atlas Township Local 7386 S. Gale MI 10/20/14 Genesee Grand Blanc 7:00 PM Local Officials, Officials, public, media Rd. public, media

Page 20 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Ashland County Ashland County Township Township Trustee OH 10/20/14 Ashland Trustee Association 6:30 PM Association Meeting Meeting Wood Co. Engineer - John 1 Court House Bowling OH 10/17/14 Wood Musteric, Chief Deputy 9:50am Kyle Keesy - SPP N/A Square Green Engineer Emergency Management Agency 1 Court House Bowling OH 10/17/14 Wood 9:30am Kyle Keesy - SPP N/A Suzette Hall – Information Square Green Coordinator Hancock Regional Planning Commission 318 Dorney OH 10/17/14 Hancock Findlay 3:30pm Kyle Keesy - SPP N/A Matthew Cordonnier – Plaza Director Hancock County Engineer - 1900 Lima OH 10/17/14 Hancock Christopher Long, County Findlay 2:30pm Kyle Keesy - SPP N/A Ave. Engineer Andrew Kalmar - Wood 1 Court House Bowling Kyle Keesy - OH 10/17/14 Wood 10:45am N/A County Administrator Square Green SPP Wood Co. Planning 1 Court House Bowling OH 10/17/14 Wood Commission - Dave Steiner, 10:20am Kyle Keesy - SPP N/A Square Green Director Doris Herringshaw - Wood 1 Court House Bowling OH 10/17/14 Wood 11:00 AM Kyle Keesy - SPP N/A County Commissioner Square Green Belmont County Belmont County Township EMS Building Township Trustee OH 10/16/14 Belmont Trustee Association St. Clairsville 6:00 PM Rte 331 Association Meeting Meeting Rep. Graves Townhall MI 10/15/14 N/A Holly N/A Public Meeting Public Meeting Event

Page 21 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Holly Town Hall Meeting; State Rep. Graves, State Sen. Jim Holly Town Hall Meeting; Ananich, State State Rep. Graves, State Sen. David Sen. Jim Ananich, State Robertson, State Sen. David Robertson, 6161 E. Holly MI 10/15/14 Oakland Holly 6:30 PM Rep. Brad State Rep. Brad Jacobsen, Rd. Jacobsen, MI MI Public Service Public Service Commission representative; Commission Rover representation TBD representative; Rover representation TBD Utica II Summit-- Agenda: Utica II Summit--Agenda: https://chamberne https://chambernews.files.w Kent State at ws.files.wordpres OH 10/14/14 Canton ordpress.com/2014/10/utica Stark 6000 North Canton 8:00-3:00 s.com/2014/10/uti -summit-ii-tentative- Frank Ave NW ca-summit-ii- agenda.pdf Per Art Arnold tentative- agenda.pdf Per Art Arnold Industry Belmont Industry Conference & Conference & College OH 10/14/14 St. Clairsville Expo; Energy Industry, key St. Clairsville 8:00-3:00 Expo; Energy Jonathan Petrea 120 Fox stakeholders Industry, key Shannon Place stakeholders Benwood City Council WV 10/14/14 Marshall 430 Main St. Benwood 7:00 PM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Rep. Gretchen Rep. Gretchen Driskell, Driskell, Twp. MI 10/14/14 Washtenaw Twp. Supervisors Co. TBD TBD 5:00 PM Supervisors Co. Commissioners Commissioners Tyler Co. Commission WV 10/14/14 Tyler 121 Main. St. Middlebourne 9:00 AM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Bridgewater Twp. Bridgewater Twp. 10990 Clinton MI 10/13/14 Washtenaw Manchester Afternoon Supervisor Ron Kyle Keesy Supervisor Ron Smith Rd. Smith Dover Twp. Dover Twp. Supervisor MI 10/13/14 Lenawee 2984 Treat St. Adrian 12:00 P.M. Supervisor Randy Kyle Keesy Randy Swander Swander

Page 22 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Adrian Twp. Adrian Twp. Supervisor 2907 Tipton MI 10/13/14 Lenawee Adrian 10:30 A.M. Supervisor James Kyle Keesy James Koehn, Hwy. Koehn, St. Clair Sen. Phil Pavlov, County Office Rep. Dan Sen. Phil Pavlov, Rep. Dan Bldg; Donald Lauwers, Twp. MI 10/13/14 St. Clair Lauwers, Twp. Supervisors, E. Dodge Port Huron 6:00 PM Supervisors, County Commissioners Auditorium; County 200 Grand Commissioners River Ave. West Union City Council WV 10/13/14 Doddridge 300 Court St. West Union 6:00 PM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Township Assn. Township Assn. OH 10/11/14 Monroe Monroe County TBD TBD Membership Jonathan Petrea Membership Meeting Meeting Community Community Meeting re: 2741 MI 10/10/14 Lapeer Lapeer 7:00 PM Meeting re: Rover Rover Pipeline Metamora Rd. Pipeline County County Commission Commission MI 10/10/14 Lapeer Meeting re: Rover 225 Clay St. Lapeer 9:00 AM Meeting re: Rover resolution resolution 10360 Freedom Twp. Freedom Twp. Supervisor MI 10/9/14 Washtenaw Pleasant Lake Ann Arbor 11:30 A.M. Supervisor Dale Kyle Keesy Dale Weidmayer Rd. Weidmayer Franklin Twp. Franklin Twp. Supervisor 3922 Monroe MI 10/9/14 Lenawee Tipton 10:00 A.M. Supervisor Bob Kyle Keesy Bob Platt Rd. Platt McMechan City Council WV 10/9/14 Marshall 47 9th St. McMechan 7:00 PM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Sen. Phil Pavlov, Sen. Phil Pavlov, Rep. Lapeer Twp. Rep. Kevin Daley, Kevin Daley, Twp. MI 10/7/14 Lapeer Hall 1500 Lapeer 6:00 PM Twp. Supervisors, Supervisors, County Morris Rd. County Commissioners Commissioners Tentative: MI Tentative: MI Laborers; Mahmoud, Banta, Laborers; Geno MI 10/7/14 N/A Geno Allesadrini, Business TBD TBD 2:00 PM Willoughby, Allesadrini, Mgr. Sweeney only Business Mgr. Almont Twp Almont Twp Supv. Paul MI 10/7/14 Almont 819 N. Main St. Almont 11:30 AM Supv. Paul Bowman Bowman Jake Bennett Jake Bennett w/Cong. 327 Cannon Washington Albert Knoll & MI 10/7/14 N/A 11:00 AM w/Cong. Kildee Kildee (MI-05) HOB DC Ryan Schnepp (MI-05)

Page 23 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Marshall Co. Commission WV 10/7/14 Marshall 600 7th St. Moundsville 9:30 AM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Wetzel Co. Commission New WV 10/7/14 Wetzel 303 Main St. 9:30 AM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Martinsville Doddridge Co. Commission 118 E. Court WV 10/7/14 Doddridge West Union 9:00 AM ET Rep. TBD Meeting St. Sen. Dave Robertson, Rep. Joe Graves, Atlas Sen. Dave Robertson, Rep. Twp. Supv. Joe Graves, Atlas Twp. Shirley Kautman- Supv. Shirley Kautman- Groveland Jones, Holly Twp. Jones, Holly Twp. Supv. Twp. Ofc. 4695 MI 10/7/14 Genesee Holly 8:00 AM Supv. Dale Smith, Dale Smith, Groveland Grange Hall Groveland Twp. Twp. Supv. Bob DePalma, Rd. Supv. Bob Brandon Twp. Supv. Kathy DePalma, Thurman Brandon Twp. Supv. Kathy Thurman Paden City City Council 208 W. Main WV 10/6/14 Tyler Paden City 7:00 PM ET Rep. TBD Meeting St. Middlebourne City Council WV 10/6/14 Tyler 100 Main St. Middlebourne 7:00 PM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Conf. Call Lapeer Conf. Call Lapeer Board of Board of MI 10/6/14 Lapeer N/A N/A 2:00 PM SPP Commissioners Garr Roy Commissioners Garr Roy Jobs Ohio-David Jobs Ohio-David Mustine, 41 S. High St. OH 10/6/14 Columbus Columbus 11:00 AM Mustine, Art Art Arnold #1500 Arnold Hancock Co. Commission 102 N. Court New WV 10/2/14 Hancock 2:30 PM ET Rep. TBD Meeting st. Cumberland Twp. Supv. Larry 4008 S. Adrian Twp. Supv. Larry MI 10/2/14 Lenawee Adrian 9:00 AM Kyle Keesy Richardson Hwy. Richardson Livingston County F2F MI 10/1/14 Livingston Emergency Preparedness Coordinator Ashley Frez Meeting Coordinator 12172 Jackson Twn. Supv. Craig MI 10/1/14 Washtenaw Twn. Supv. Craig Maier, Chelsea 10:30 AM Kyle Keesy Rd. Maier, Twp. Supv Gene 275 Macomb Twp. Supv Gene MI 10/1/14 Washtenaw Manchester 9:00 AM Kyle Keesy DeRossett, St. DeRossett, Co. Water Kyle Keesy, Co. Water Resources 705 N. Zeeb Resources MI 9/30/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor 2:00 PM Haley Dunnigan, Commissioner Rd. Commissioner Emma Paolino Evan Pratt:

Page 24 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

6888 Dexter Twp. Supv. MI 9/30/14 Washtenaw Twp. Supv. James Drollet Dexter 10:30 AM Kyle Keesy Pinckney Rd. James Drollet Wetzel Co. Commission New WV 9/30/14 Wetzel 303 Main St. 9:30 AM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Martinsville Tyler Co. Commission WV 9/30/14 Tyler 121 Main. St. Middlebourne 9:00 AM ET Rep. TBD Meeting Twp. Supv. John MI 9/30/14 Lenawee Twp. Supv. John Gould, 121 Main. St. Morenci 7:45 AM Kyle Keesy Gould, Commissioner 100 West Beau 3 - 4 p.m. Grant Ruckel, Irey Vaughan, PA 9/30/2014 Washington County Commissioners Commissioners Street, Suite Washington stop by Seth Willoughby Larry Maggi and 702 meeting & Vanessa Getz Harlen Shober Belmont Job Fair; Ryan Job Fair; Ryan Schnepp, College 120 Schnepp, Ken OH 9/26/14 St. Clairsville Ken Collins, Jonathan St. Clairsville 10:00-2:00 Fox Shannon Collins, Jonathan Petrea Place Petrea Not Department of Job and Veterans 70 North Plains OH 9/26/14 Athens The Plains specified by Jonathan Tyma SPP Contact Family Services Representative Road SPP Director of Not Workforce and 120 Fox- Robert Guentter OH 9/26/14 Belmont Belmont College St. Clairsville specified by SPP Contact Economic Shannon Road Jr. SPP Development Not 120 Fox- Dr. Paul OH 9/26/14 Belmont Belmont College President St. Clairsville specified by SPP Contact Shannon Road Gasparro SPP Director Not 9900 Brick OH 9/26/14 Muskingum Zane State College Student Cambridge specified by Konrad Akens SPP Contact Church Road Services SPP Dean of Business, Not Washington State 710 Colegate Brenda OH 9/26/14 Washington Engineering Marietta specified by SPP Contact Community College Drive Kornmiller and Industrial SPP Technologies P.O. Box Wetzel County Chamber of New WV 9/25/14 Wetzel President 271/201 Main Phone Don Riggenbach Commerce Martinsville Street 100 Main Charles WV 9/25/14 Tyler Middlebourne Mayor Middlebourne Email Street Delauder Not OH 9/25/14 Ashland City of Orrville Mayor 207 N. Main St. City of Orrville specified by David Handwerk SPP Contact SPP Not Council 206 Claremont City of OH 9/25/14 Ashland City of Ashland specified by Stephen Stuart SPP Contact Member Ave. Ashland SPP

Page 25 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not Village of OH 9/25/14 Ashland Village of Loudonville Mayor P. O. Box 150 specified by Stewart Zody SPP Contact Loudonville SPP Not Council 3197 Belmont Village of OH 9/25/14 Belmont Village of Bellaire specified by Patricia Thomas SPP Contact Member St. Bellaire SPP Not Council 3197 Belmont Village of OH 9/25/14 Belmont Village of Bellaire specified by LouAnn Bennett SPP Contact Member St. Bellaire SPP Not Council 3197 Belmont Village of OH 9/25/14 Belmont Village of Bellaire specified by Jerry Fisher SPP Contact Member St. Bellaire SPP Not Council 3197 Belmont Village of OH 9/25/14 Belmont Village of Bellaire specified by Joshua Meyers SPP Contact Member St. Bellaire SPP Not Council 3197 Belmont Village of OH 9/25/14 Belmont Village of Bellaire specified by James Piatt SPP Contact Member St. Bellaire SPP Not Council 3197 Belmont Village of OH 9/25/14 Belmont Village of Bellaire specified by James Williams SPP Contact Member St. Bellaire SPP Not Council City of OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St. Clairsville P. O. Box 537 specified by Terry Pugh SPP Contact President St.Clairsville SPP Not City of OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville Councilman P. O. Box 537 specified by Jake Olsavsky SPP Contact St.Clairsville SPP Not City of OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville Councilman P. O. Box 537 specified by Frank Sabatino SPP Contact St.Clairsville SPP Not City of OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville Councilman P. O. Box 537 specified by John Bukmir SPP Contact St.Clairsville SPP Not City of OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville Councilman P. O. Box 537 specified by David Trouten SPP Contact St.Clairsville SPP Not Council at City of James OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville P. O. Box 537 specified by SPP Contact Large St.Clairsville Weisgerger SPP Not Council at City of Libby OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville P. O. Box 537 specified by SPP Contact Large St.Clairsville Heintzelman SPP Not Council at City of OH 9/25/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville P. O. Box 537 specified by Perry Jones SPP Contact Large St.Clairsville SPP

Page 26 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not 500 S. City of OH 9/25/14 Crawford City of Bucyrus Mayor specified by Jeff Reser SPP Contact Sandusky Ave. Bucyrus SPP Not Council Woodsfield OH 9/25/14 Monroe Woodsfield Village 221 S. Main St. specified by Mike Cox SPP Contact Member Village SPP Not Council Woodsfield OH 9/25/14 Monroe Woodsfield Village 221 S. Main St. specified by Dale English SPP Contact Member Village SPP Not Council Woodsfield OH 9/25/14 Monroe Woodsfield Village 221 S. Main St. specified by William Moore SPP Contact Member Village SPP Not Council Woodsfield OH 9/25/14 Monroe Woodsfield Village 221 S. Main St. specified by Rick Shipp SPP Contact Member Village SPP Not Council Woodsfield OH 9/25/14 Monroe Woodsfield Village 221 S. Main St. specified by Matt Vinskovich SPP Contact Member Village SPP Not 30 N.Diamond City of OH 9/25/14 Richland City of Mansfield Mayor specified by Tim Theaker SPP Contact St. Mansfield SPP Not 100 N. Seltzer Village of OH 9/25/14 Richland Village of Crestline Mayor specified by David Sharrock SPP Contact St. Crestline SPP Not OH 9/25/14 Richland City of Shelby Mayor 43 W. Main St. City of Shelby specified by Marilyn John SPP Contact SPP Not 302 S. Wabash Village of OH 9/25/14 Stark Village of Brewster Mayor specified by Mike Schwab SPP Contact Ave. Brewster SPP One James Not City of Kathy Catazaro- OH 9/25/14 Wayne City of Massillon Mayor Duncan Plaza specified by SPP Contact Massillon Perry S.E. SPP Not 150 W. Village of OH 9/25/14 Wayne Village of Shreve Mayor specified by Bruce Biggs SPP Contact McConkey St. Shreve SPP Not 538 N. Market City of OH 9/25/14 Wayne City of Wooster Mayor specified by Bob Breneman SPP Contact St. Wooster SPP County WV Farm Bureau-Tyler President & 1362 Oil Ridge WV 9/24/14 Tyler Sistersville Email David Ash County Regional Rd. Director

Page 27 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not 3197 Belmont Village of Vincent OH 9/24/14 Belmont Village of Bellaire Mayor specified by SPP Contact St. Bellaire DiFabrizio SPP Not 50 E. 39th OH 9/24/14 Belmont Village of Shadyside Mayor Shadyside specified by Bob Newhart SPP Contact Street SPP Not 35 South 5th OH 9/24/14 Belmont City of Martins Ferry Mayor Martins Ferry specified by Paul Reithmiller SPP Contact Street SPP Not Village of OH 9/24/14 Belmont Village of Shadyside Mayor 50 E. 39th St. specified by Bob Newhart SPP Contact Shadyside SPP Not City of OH 9/24/14 Belmont City of St.Clairsville Mayor P. O. Box 537 specified by Robert Vicenzo SPP Contact St.Clairsville SPP Not 35 South 5th City of OH 9/24/14 Belmont City of Martins Ferry Mayor specified by Paul Riethmiller SPP Contact St. Martins Ferry SPP Not Village of OH 9/24/14 Harrison Village of Cadiz Mayor 128 Court St. specified by Ken Zitko SPP Contact Cadiz SPP Not 128 Court Village of OH 9/24/14 Harrison Village of Cadiz Mayor specified by Ken Zitko SPP Contact Street Cadiz SPP Not Village of OH 9/24/14 Jefferson Village of Wintersville Mayor 200 Grove St. specified by Bob Gale SPP Contact Wintersville SPP Not 200 Grove Village of OH 9/24/14 Jefferson Village of Wintersville Mayor specified by Bob Gale SPP Contact Street Wintersville SPP Not 115 South 3rd City of OH 9/24/14 Jefferson City of Steubenville Mayor specified by Domenik Mucci SPP Contact Street Steubenville SPP Not 115 S. Third City of OH 9/24/14 Jefferson City of Steubenville Mayor specified by Domenick Mucci, SPP Contact St. Steubenville SPP Not OH 9/24/14 Monroe Woodsfield Village Mayor 221 S. Main St. Woodsfield specified by William Bolon SPP Contact SPP Not Woodsfield OH 9/24/14 Monroe Woodsfield Village Mayor 221 S. Main St. specified by Wiliam Bolon SPP Contact Village SPP Not 110 E. Third Richard OH 9/24/14 Stark City of Dover Mayor City of Dover specified by SPP Contact St. Homrighausen SPP

Page 28 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not Village of OH 9/24/14 Stark Village of Beach City Mayor 105 E. Main St specified by Connie White SPP Contact Beach City SPP Not Stark County Township OH 9/24/14 Stark President PO Box 181 Nimishillen specified by Mike Lynch SPP Contact Trustees Association SPP Not City of OH 9/24/14 Tuscarawas City of Toronto Mayor 416 Clark St. specified by John Geddis SPP Contact Toronto SPP Not 305 E. Second City of OH 9/24/14 Tuscarawas City of Uhrichsville Mayor specified by Terry Culbertson SPP Contact St. Uhrichsville SPP F2F MI 9/23/14 Livingston Putnam Township Supervisor Ron Rau Meeting Putnam Township Putnam Township Kyle Keesey, MI 9/23/14 Livingston 3280 W. M36 Pinckney 11:00 AM Supervisor Ron Supervisor Haley Dunnigan Rau County WV 9/22/14 Marshall Marshall County Assessor P.O. Box 554 Moundsville Phone Chris Kessler Assessor 208 W. Main WV 9/19/14 Tyler Paden City Mayor Paden City Phone John Hopkins Street Not Member of OH 9/18/14 Stark Village of Brewster Council specified by Steven Tharp SPP Contact Council SPP Tyler County Commission WV 9/17/14 Tyler Tyler County Commission Commission Middlebourne Email John Stender President P.O. Box 66 MI 9/16/14 Lapeer Hadley Township Treasurer Phone Chris Tippen MI 9/16/14 Lapeer Metamora Township Clerk Phone Jenny Dagher MI 9/16/14 Lapeer Elba Township Supervisor Phone Michael Boskee MI 9/16/14 Lapeer Lapeer Township Supervisor Phone Scott Jarvis MI 9/16/14 Lapeer Attica Township Supervisor Phone Al Ochadleus MI 9/16/14 Lapeer Imlay Township Supervisor Phone Steve Hoeksema Not Crawford County Township OH 9/16/14 Crawford CCTA Pres specified by Clay Ehman SPP Contact Association Pres SPP Not Richland Township Trustee OH 9/16/14 Richland RTTA Pres specified by Dan Fletcher SPP Contact Association SPP Tuscarawas County Not OH 9/16/14 Tuscarawas Township Association TTTAPres specified by Don Akerman SPP Contact President SPP Marilyn "Micki" MI 9/15/14 Genesee Grand Blanc Township Supervisor Phone Hoffman MI 9/15/14 Genesee Fenton Township Supervisor Phone Bonnie Mathis

Page 29 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

MI 9/15/14 Genesee Argentine Township Supervisor Phone Robert Cole Lapeer Board of District 2 MI 9/15/14 Lapeer Phone Gary Roy Commissioners Commissioner Not Ashland County Township OH 9/15/14 Ashland ATTA Pres specified by Cheryl Welch SPP Contact Association President SPP Lapeer Board of Administrative MI 9/11/14 Lapeer Phone Doreen Clark Commissioners Assistant MI 9/11/14 Livingston Iosco Township Clerk Phone Dan Delmerico Bruce Township Board of MI 9/11/14 Macomb Treasurer Phone Debbie Overact Trustees Sterling Heights MI 9/11/14 Macomb Engineer Phone Scott Sharon Engineering Groveland Township MI 9/11/14 Oakland Supervisor Phone Bob Depalma Supervisor Oakland County - GR TX MI 9/11/14 Oakland Phone Larry Tharp VM Linda MI 9/11/14 St. Clair China Township Supervisor Phone Schweihofer MI 9/11/14 Washtenaw Lima Township Supervisor Supervisor Phone Craig Maier New WV 9/11/14 Hancock New Cumberland Mayor PO Box 505 Phone Linda McNeil Cumberland WV 9/11/14 Marshall Benwood Mayor Benwood Phone Edward Kuca WV 9/11/14 Marshall McMechan Mayor 47 9th Street McMechen Phone Gregg Wolfe Not 63900 Hunter OH 9/11/14 Belmont Goshen Twp Trustee Belmont specified by Bruce Miller SPP Contact Belmont Road SPP Not 56080 Matts OH 9/11/14 Belmont Mead Twp Trustee Shadyside specified by Edward Good SPP Contact Lane SPP Not 215 W. 43Rd OH 9/11/14 Belmont Mead Twp Trustee Shadyside specified by Gregg Warren SPP Contact Street SPP 58005 Not Armstrong OH 9/11/14 Belmont Washington Twp Trustee Jacobsburg specified by Sammy Milhoan SPP Contact Centerville SPP Road 556355 Not OH 9/11/14 Belmont Washington Twp Trustee Belmont Ridge Bealsville specified by Paul Kanzigg SPP Contact Road SPP Not 65140 Breezy OH 9/11/14 Belmont Pultney Twp Trustee Bellaire specified by Frank Shaffer SPP Contact Point Ln SPP

Page 30 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not 62683 OK OH 9/11/14 Belmont Smith Twp Trustee Belmont specified by Stephen Baker SPP Contact Road SPP 62830 Not OH 9/11/14 Belmont Smith Twp Trustee Centerville Belmont specified by Michael Delaney SPP Contact Warnock RD SPP 48465 Not OH 9/11/14 Belmont Smith Twp Trustee Centerville Belmont specified by Ronald Duvall SPP Contact Jacobsburg RD SPP Not 66609 Anna OH 9/11/14 Belmont Richland Twp Trustee St Clairsville specified by Rick Ferrell SPP Contact Drive SPP Not OH 9/11/14 Belmont Richland Twp Trustee 67775 Mills Rd St Clairsville specified by Greg Bizzarri SPP Contact SPP Not 67178 Country OH 9/11/14 Belmont Richland Two Trustee St Clairsville specified by Greg Reline SPP Contact Club Road SPP Shirley Kautman- MI 9/10/14 Genesee Atlas Township Supervisor Phone Jones Brooke-Hancock Executive 3174 Penn WV 9/10/14 Hancock Weirton Phone Patrick Ford Development Corporation Director Ave. Suite 1 Not 64620 Loomis Shawn Matthew OH 9/10/14 Belmont Goshen Twp Trustee Belmont specified by SPP Contact Ln Thompson SPP Not OH 9/10/14 Monroe Antioch Village Mayor specified by Melinda Vernon SPP Contact SPP Not 38415 Rock New OH 9/10/14 Monroe Benton Twp Trustee specified by Dale Detrich SPP Contact Camp Road Matamoras SPP Not OH 9/10/14 Monroe Adams Twp Trustee 45774 TH 1014 Woodsfield specified by Jerry McClellan SPP Contact SPP Not 46625 ST RT OH 9/10/14 Monroe Adams Twp Fiscal Officer Woodsfield specified by Brenda Roberts SPP Contact 536 SPP Not 44754 Bondi OH 9/10/14 Monroe Green Twp Trustee Woodsfield specified by Lawrence Rutter SPP Contact Ridge Road SPP Not 44731 6 Points OH 9/10/14 Monroe Green Twp Trustee Woodsfield specified by Frankie McCaslin SPP Contact Road SPP

Page 31 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not 40834 Eddie OH 9/10/14 Monroe Greent Twp Trustee Woodsfield specified by Gary Haskinson SPP Contact Ridge Road SPP Not 42688 ST RT OH 9/10/14 Monroe Franklyn Twp Trustee Lewisville specified by Christopher Huck SPP Contact 145 SPP Not 42385 Mill OH 9/10/14 Monroe Franklyn Twp Trustee Stafford specified by Cliff Delong SPP Contact Street SPP Not 42339 ST RT OH 9/10/14 Monroe Fanklyn Twp Trustee Stafford specified by Gary West SPP Contact 145 SPP Not OH 9/8/14 Stark Stark State College Administrator specified by Kathleen Steer SPP Contact SPP Marshall County Chamber 609 Jefferson WV 9/4/14 Marshall President Moundsvile Phone Fred Brunner of Commerce Ave. MI 9/4/14 Genesee Mundy Township Supervisor Phone Dave Guigear Shiawassee County MI 9/4/14 Shiawassee Administrator Phone T.J. Clark Administrator 2201 Hogback MI 9/4/14 Washtenaw Washtenaw County Sheriff Sheriff Ann Arbor Phone Jerry Clayton Road 510 Court OH 9/4/14 Defiance Defiance County Engineer Engineer Street, Suite Defiance Phone Warren Schlatter 201 OH 9/4/14 Wood Wood County Administrator Administrator Phone Andrew Kalmer Deputy OH 9/4/14 Wood Wood County Engineer Phone John Muteric Engineer 3174 Weirton Chamber of WV 9/4/14 Hancock President Pennsylvania Weirton Email Brenda Mull Commerce Ave Suite 1 Human Not Ashland County West Resource 1783 State OH 9/4/14 Ashland Ashland specified by Adrea Tennant SPP Contact Holmes Career Center Development Route 60 SPP Coordinator Human Not Ashland County West Resource 1783 State OH 9/4/14 Ashland Ashland specified by Erv Howard SPP Contact Holmes Career Center Development Route 60 SPP Coordinator Not 122 East Main OH 9/4/14 Ashland Loudonville Public Library Director Loudonville specified by Michael Thornton SPP Contact Street SPP Not Insurance 15162 State OH 9/4/14 Ashland Haudenschild Agency Loudonville specified by Matt Stewart SPP Contact Agent Route 39 SPP

Page 32 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not OSU Richland County Academic 1760 University OH 9/3/14 Richland Mansfield specified by Bill Bower SPP Contact Campus Advisor Drive SPP Not OSU Richland County School of Earth 1760 University OH 9/3/14 Richland Mansfield specified by Ozeas Costa SPP Contact Campus Sciences Drive SPP Not 2441 Kenwood OH 9/3/14 Richland North Central State College Admissions Mansfield specified by Bev Walker SPP Contact Circle SPP Not 2441 Kenwood OH 9/3/14 Richland North Central State College Admissions Mansfield specified by Greg Timberlake SPP Contact Circle SPP Not Deputy 201 W. North OH 9/3/14 Wayne Wayne County Engineer Wooster specified by Jeffrey Sparr SPP Contact Engineer Street SPP New WV 9/2/14 Hancock Hancock County Sheriff Sheriff P.O. Box 458 Phone Ralph Fletcher Cumberland Wetzel County New WV 9/2/14 Wetzel Wetzel County Commission Commissioner Commission Email Donald E. Mason Martinsville P.O. Box 156 Wetzel County New Robert "Bob" WV 9/2/14 Wetzel Wetzel County Commission Commissioner Commission Email Martinsville Gorby P.O. Box 156 Deputy MI 8/28/14 Lapeer Lapeer Register of Deeds Register of Phone Lori Gebhadt Deeds Livingston County Register Register of 200 E Grand MI 8/28/14 Livingston Howell Phone Sally Reynolds of Deeds Deeds River Ave Uniformed MI 8/28/14 Macomb Macomb County Sheriff Phone John Michalke Services Lt. Deputy Macomb County Register of MI 8/28/14 Macomb Register of Phone Craig Jones Deeds Deeds 1200 North Telegraph MI 8/28/14 Oakland Oakland County Sheriff Sheriff Pontiac Phone Michael Bouchard Road Building 38E Shiawassee Register of Register of MI 8/28/14 Shiawassee Phone Lori Kimble Deeds Deeds MI 8/28/14 St. Clair St. Clair County Sheriff Under Sheriff Phone Tom Buckley Deputy St. Clair County Register of MI 8/28/14 St. Clair Register of Phone Bruce Franek Deeds Deeds MI 8/28/14 Lenawee Lenawee County Sheriff Under Sheriff Phone Jim Anderson

Page 33 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Lenawee County Register Register of 301 N. Main MI 8/28/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Carolyn Bater of Deeds Deeds Street Washtenaw County Register of 200 N. Main, MI 8/28/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone James Dries Register of Deeds Deeds Suite 110 OH 8/28/14 Defiance Defiance County Sheriff Sheriff 113 Biede Ave Defiance Phone David Westrick Assistant OH 8/28/14 Defiance Defiance County Engineer Phone Mike Lenhart Engineer 500 Second OH 8/28/14 Defiance Defiance County Recorder Recorder Street, Suite Defiance Phone Cecilia Parsons 201 129 OH 8/28/14 Fulton Fulton County Sheriff Sheriff Courthouse Wauseon Phone Roy Miller Plaza 9120 Co. Rd. OH 8/28/14 Fulton Fulton County Engineer Engineer Wauseon Phone Frank Onweller 14 152 S. Fulton OH 8/28/14 Fulton Fulton County Recorder Recorder Fulton Phone Sandra Barbe St. 200 West OH 8/28/14 Hancock Hancock County Sheriff Sheriff Crawford Findlay Phone Michael Heldman Street 1900 Lima OH 8/28/14 Hancock Hancock County Engineer Engineer Findlay Phone Christopher Long Avenue 300 S. Main OH 8/28/14 Hancock Hancock County Recorder Recorder Findlay Phone Nikki Beltz St., Room 23 660 North OH 8/28/14 Henry Henry County Engineer Engineer Napoleon Phone Timothy Schumm Perry Street 660 N. Perry OH 8/28/14 Henry Henry County Recorder Recorder Napoleon Phone Sara Myles St., Suite 202 109 S Washington OH 8/28/14 Seneca Seneca County Recorder Recorder Tiffin Phone Michael Dell Street Suite 2104 1960 East Bowling OH 8/28/14 Wood Wood County Sheriff Sheriff Gypsy Lane Phone Mark Wasylyshyn Green Road Hancock County President 300 South OH 8/28/14 Hancock Findlay F2F Mark Gazarek Commissioner Commissioner Main Street 1853 Oakwood Henry County President Avenue Henry OH 8/28/14 Henry Napoleon F2F Robert Hastedt Commissioner Commissioner County Office Complex 1853 Oakwood Henry County Avenue Henry OH 8/28/14 Henry Commissioner Napoleon F2F Glenn Miller Commissioner County Office Complex

Page 34 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Hancock County Michael WV 8/28/14 Hancock Commissioner Email Commissioner Schwartzmiller Hancock County WV 8/28/14 Hancock Commissioner Email Jeff Davis Commissioner Doddridge County 118 East Court WV 8/28/14 Doddridge Commissioner West Union Email Shirley Williams Commission Street Doddridge County 118 East Court WV 8/28/14 Doddridge Commissioner West Union Email Ralph Sandora Commission Street Doddridge County 118 East Court Gregory WV 8/28/14 Doddridge Commissioner West Union Email Commission Street Robinson 600 Sixth Marshall County WV 8/27/14 Marshall Sheriff Street P.O. Moundsville Phone Kevin Cecil Commissioner Box 648 Wetzel County New WV 8/27/14 Wetzel Wetzel County Commission Commissioner Commission Phone Lawrence Lemon Martinsville P.O. Box 156 Wetzel County New WV 8/27/14 Wetzel Wetzel County Sheriff Sheriff Sheriff P.O. Phone John Brookover Martinsville Box D Hancock County Commission Danny WV 8/26/14 Hancock Phone Commissioner President Greathouse New WV 8/26/14 Hancock Hancock County Clerk County Clerk P.O. Box 367 Phone George Foley Cumberland Genesee County Farm MI 8/21/14 Genesee Phone Jennifer Garrison Bureau Genesee County Board of MI 8/21/14 Genesee Phone Tony Brown Commissioners Genesee County Board of MI 8/21/14 Genesee Phone Mark Young Commissioners Genesee County Board of MI 8/21/14 Genesee Phone Ted Henry Commissioners Lapeer County Farm MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone Gloria Ginell Bureau Lapeer Board of County MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone John Biscoe Commissioners Administrator Lapeer Board of District 5 MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone Dave Eady Commissioners Commissioner Lapeer Board of District 4 MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone Lenny Schneider Commissioners Commissioner Lapeer Board of District 6 MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone Linda Jarvis Commissioners Commissioner Lapeer Board of District 7 MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone C. Ian Kemph Commissioners Commissioner Lapeer Board of District 1 MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone Cheryl Clark Commissioners Commissioner

Page 35 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Lapeer Board of District 3 MI 8/21/14 Lapeer Phone Dyle Henning Commissioners Commissioner MI 8/21/14 Shiawassee Shiawassee Farm Bureau Phone Brandi Harrison Shiawassee Board of District 1 MI 8/21/14 Shiawassee Phone Mary Nordbeck Commissioners Commissioner Shiawassee Board of District 2 MI 8/21/14 Shiawassee Phone John Horvath Commissioners Commissioner Shiawassee Board of District 3 MI 8/21/14 Shiawassee Phone Gary Holzhausen Commissioners Commissioner Shiawassee Board of District 6 MI 8/21/14 Shiawassee Phone Jeffrey Bartz Commissioners Commissioner Shiawassee Board of District 7 MI 8/21/14 Shiawassee Phone John Plowman Commissioners Commissioner Not Ashland Wayne Farm OH 8/21/14 Ashland Director specified by John Fitzpatrick SPP Contact Bureau SPP Not Belmont Monroe Noble OH 8/21/14 Belmont Director specified by Betsy Anderson SPP Contact Farm Bureau SPP Not Carroll Harrison Jefferson OH 8/21/14 Carroll Director specified by Michelle Specht SPP Contact Tusc. Farm Bureau SPP Not OH 8/21/14 Crawford Crawford Farm Bureau Director specified by Tim Hicks SPP Contact SPP Not OH 8/21/14 Harrison Bowerston Mayor specified by Milo Baker SPP Contact SPP Not OH 8/21/14 Stark Farm Bureau Director specified by Nick Kennedy SPP Contact SPP MI 8/12/14 Macomb Macomb Farm Bureau Phone Julie Wallace MI 8/12/14 Oakland Oakland Farm Bureau Phone Penny Thomas MI 8/12/14 St. Clair St. Clair Farm Bureau Phone Sherri Gottleber MI 8/12/14 Lenawee Lenawee Farm Bureau Phone Gwendolyn Hess MI 8/12/14 Washtenaw Washtenaw Farm Bureau Phone Betsy Taylor Defiance, Henry & Fulton OH 8/12/14 Defiance Phone Roy Norman Farm Bureau OH 8/12/14 Hancock Hancock Farm Bureau Phone Jennifer Wilson Seneca & Wood County OH 8/12/14 Seneca Asst. Dir. Phone Donna Morter Farm Bureau MI 8/12/14 Livingston Livingston Farm Bureau Phone Debra Holmes Not Loudonville Mohican 131 W. Main OH 8/12/14 Ashland President/CEO Loudonville specified by Lynette Piper SPP Contact Chamber of Commerce St. SPP

Page 36 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not St. Clairsville Area Executive OH 8/12/14 Belmont 133 E. Main St. St. Clairsville specified by Jennifer Wollard SPP Contact Chamber of Commerce Director SPP Not Barnesville Chamber of 130 W. Main OH 8/12/14 Belmont President Barnesville specified by Bill Steedle SPP Contact Commerce St. SPP Not Bridgeport Area Chamber OH 8/12/14 Belmont PO Box 86 Bridgeport specified by Ann Gallagher SPP Contact of Commerce SPP Not Bellaire Chamber of 3287 Belmont OH 8/12/14 Belmont President Bellaire specified by Lou Ann Bennett SPP Contact Commerce Street SPP Not Shadyside Area Chamber OH 8/12/14 Belmont PO Box 115 Shadyside specified by Patricia Heller SPP Contact of Commerce SPP 119 South Not OH 8/12/14 Carroll Carroll County Recorder Recorder Lisbon Street, Carrollton specified by Patricia Oyer SPP Contact Suite 205 SPP Not OH 8/12/14 Columbiana Salem Area Chamber ED specified by Audrey Null SPP Contact SPP Not Gallion Area Chamber of 106 Harding OH 8/12/14 Crawford President/CEO Galion specified by Joe Kleinknecht SPP Contact Commerce Way East SPP Not Bucyrus Area Chamber of Executive 122 W OH 8/12/14 Crawford Bucyrus specified by Deb Pinion SPP Contact Commerce Director Rensselaer St SPP Not Sarah OH 8/12/14 Crawford Village of Chatfield Mayor Chatfield specified by SPP Contact Causemayer SPP Not 627 Wheeling Colleen OH 8/12/14 Guernsey Guernsey County Recorder Recorder Cambridge specified by SPP Contact Ave Ste 305 Wheatley SPP Not 301 Market OH 8/12/14 Jefferson Jefferson County Recorder Recorder Steubenville specified by Paul McKeegan SPP Contact Street SPP Not Toronto Chamber of 107 North 4th OH 8/12/14 Jefferson President Toronto specified by Rebecca Latynski SPP Contact Commerce St. SPP Not Monroe County Chamber of OH 8/12/14 Monroe President 117 N. Main St Woodsfield specified by Rusty Atkinson SPP Contact Commerce SPP Not Noble County Chamber of Executive OH 8/12/14 Noble PO Box 41 Caldwell specified by Jill McCartney SPP Contact Commerce Director SPP

Page 37 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not Shelby Chamber of 142 N Gamble OH 8/12/14 Richland President Shelby specified by Carol Knapp SPP Contact Commerce St Ste A SPP Not Clear Fork Valley Chamber OH 8/12/14 Richland President P. O. Box 336 Bellville specified by Darrell Clemens SPP Contact of Commerce SPP Not Canton Regional Chamber 222 Market OH 8/12/14 Stark President Canton specified by Dennis Saunier SPP Contact of Commerce Avenue N. SPP Not Massillon Area Chamber of 137 Lincoln Robert OH 8/12/14 Stark President Massilon specified by SPP Contact Commerce Way East Sanderson SPP Not Alliance Area Chamber of OH 8/12/14 Stark President 210 E. Main St. Alliance specified by R. Mark Locke SPP Contact Commerce SPP 116 N. Canal Not Canal Fulton Area Chamber OH 8/12/14 Stark President Street, P.O. Canal Fulton specified by Scott Demko SPP Contact of Commerce Box 636 SPP 11932 King Not Lake Township Chamber of OH 8/12/14 Stark President Church Ave Uniontown specified by Christa Kozy SPP Contact Commerce NW SPP Not Louisville Chamber Of OH 8/12/14 Stark President 229 E Main St. Louisville specified by Cheryle Casar SPP Contact Commerce SPP Not Minerva Chamber of 203 N. Market OH 8/12/14 Stark President Minerva specified by Dave Hank SPP Contact Commerce St. SPP Not Muskingum Valley Area Executive OH 8/12/14 Washington PO Box 837 Beverly specified by Rick Walters SPP Contact Chamber of Commerce Director SPP Not Belpre Area Chamber of Executive OH 8/12/14 Washington 713 Park Drive Belpre specified by Karen Waller SPP Contact Commerce Director SPP Not Marietta Area Chamber of Executive 100 Front St., OH 8/12/14 Washington Marietta specified by Charlotte Keim SPP Contact Commerce Director Suite 200 SPP Macomb Board of District 1 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Toni Moceri Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 2 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Marv Sauger Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 3 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Veronica Klinefelt Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 5 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Rob Mijac Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens

Page 38 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Macomb Board of District 6 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Jim Carabelli Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 8 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Kathy Vosburg Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 9 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Fred Miller Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 10 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Mike Boyle Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 12 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Bob Smith Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 13 1 South Main Mount MI 8/6/14 Macomb Phone Joe Sabatini Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens 1200 North Oakland Board of District 4 Thomas MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Commissioner Commissioner Middleton Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 5 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone John Scott Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 6 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Jim Runestad Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 7 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Christine Long Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 8 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Philip Weipert Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 9 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Kathy Crawford Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 10 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Mattie Hatchett Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 11 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Robert Gosselin Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 12 Shelley Goodman MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Commissioner Commissioner Taub Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 13 Marcia MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Commissioner Commissioner Gershenson Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 14 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone William Dwyer Commissioner Commissioner Road

Page 39 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

1200 North Oakland Board of District 15 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Jeff Matis Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 16 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Mike Bosnic Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 17 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Nancy Quarles Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 18 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Helaine Zack Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 19 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Dave Woodward Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 20 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Gary McGillivray Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 21 MI 8/6/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Janet Jackson Commissioner Commissioner Road Not 1511 OH 8/6/14 Ashland Ashland County Engineer Engineer Ashland specified by Edward Meixner SPP Contact Cleveland Ave. SPP Not 142 W. 2nd OH 8/6/14 Ashland Ashland County Recorder Recorder Ashland specified by Michal Crow SPP Contact Street SPP Not Ashland Area Chamber of 211 Claremont OH 8/6/14 Ashland President/CEO Ashland specified by Barbie Lange SPP Contact Commerce Avenue SPP 200 Not OH 8/6/14 Carroll Carroll County Engineer Engineer Kensington Carrollton specified by Dale Williams SPP Contact Road, NE SPP Not Carroll County Chamber of 61 N. Lisbon OH 8/6/14 Carroll President Carrolton specified by Amy Rutledge SPP Contact Commerce St. SPP Not 105 S. Market OH 8/6/14 Columbiana Columbiana County Sheriff Sheriff Lisbon specified by Ray Stone SPP Contact Street SPP Not Columbiana Area Chamber OH 8/6/14 Columbiana ED specified by Leah Wilson SPP Contact of Commerce SPP Not OH 8/6/14 Crawford Crawford County Engineer Bucyrus specified by Mark Baker SPP Contact SPP

Page 40 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not OH 8/6/14 Crawford Crawford County Recorder specified by Karen Scott SPP Contact SPP Not 62782 Bennett OH 8/6/14 Guernsey Guernsey County Engineer Engineer Cambridge specified by Delmar George SPP Contact Ave SPP Not Cambridge Area Chamber Executive 607 Wheeling OH 8/6/14 Guernsey Cambridge specified by Joanne Sexton SPP Contact of Commerce Director Avenue SPP Not 114 Court OH 8/6/14 Harrison Harrison County Sheriff Sheriff St. Cadiz specified by Ronald Myers SPP Contact Street SPP Not 100 W. Market OH 8/6/14 Harrison Harrison County Engineer Engineer Cadiz specified by Robert Sterling SPP Contact St. SPP Not 538 North Main OH 8/6/14 Harrison Harrison County Recorder Recorder Cadiz specified by Tracy Boyer SPP Contact Street SPP Not 16001 State OH 8/6/14 Jefferson Jefferson County Sheriff Sheriff Steubenville specified by Fred Abdalla SPP Contact Route 7 SPP Not Jefferson County Chamber 630 Market OH 8/6/14 Jefferson President Steubenville specified by Rich Deluca SPP Contact of Commerce Street SPP 101 N Main Not OH 8/6/14 Monroe Monroe County Recorder Recorder Street Room Woodsfield specified by Ann Block SPP Contact 20 SPP Not OH 8/6/14 Monroe Monroe County Engineer specified by Lonnie Tustin SPP Contact SPP Not 597 Park OH 8/6/14 Richland Richland County Sheriff Sheriff Mansfield specified by Steve Sheldon SPP Contact Avenue E. SPP Not 77 N Mulberry OH 8/6/14 Richland Richland County Engineer Engineer Mansfield specified by Thomas Beck SPP Contact Street SPP Not 50 Park OH 8/6/14 Richland Richland County Recorder Recorder Mansfield specified by Sarah Davis SPP Contact Avenue East SPP Chamber Not Mansfield/Richland Area 55 N. Mulberry OH 8/6/14 Richland Foundation Mansfield specified by Jodi Perry SPP Contact Chamber of Commerce St. Director SPP Not 4500 Atlantic OH 8/6/14 Stark Stark County Sheriff Sheriff Canton specified by George Maier SPP Contact Blvd., N.E. SPP

Page 41 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not 5165 Southway OH 8/6/14 Stark Stark County Engineer Engineer Canton specified by Keith Bennett SPP Contact Street S.W. SPP 110 Central Not OH 8/6/14 Stark Stark County Recorder Recorder Plaza South, Canton specified by Rick Campbell SPP Contact Suite 170 SPP Not North Canton Area OH 8/6/14 Stark President 121 S. Main St. North Canton specified by David Kaminski SPP Contact Chamber of Commerce SPP Not Tuscarawas County 832 Front New OH 8/6/14 Tuscarawas Engineer specified by Joseph Bachman SPP Contact Engineer Avenue SW Philadelphia SPP Not Tuscarawas County 125 East High New OH 8/6/14 Tuscarawas Recorder specified by Lori Smith SPP Contact Recorder Avenue Philadelphia SPP Not Washington County 103 Westview OH 8/6/14 Washington Engineer Marietta specified by Roger Wright SPP Contact Engineer Ave. SPP Not Washington County 205 Putnam OH 8/6/14 Washington Recorder Marietta specified by Tracey Wright SPP Contact Recorder Street SPP Not 201 W. North OH 8/6/14 Wayne Wayne County Sheriff Sheriff Wooster specified by Thomas Maurer SPP Contact Street SPP Not Wooster Area Chamber of OH 8/6/14 Wayne President 377 W. Liberty Wooster specified by Justin Starlin SPP Contact Commerce SPP One Wood County President Bowling OH 8/1/14 Wood Courthouse Phone James Carter Commissioner Commissioner Green Square One Wood County Bowling OH 8/1/14 Wood Commissioner Courthouse Phone Joel Kuhlman Commissioner Green Square 304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 1 MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone Kate Lawrence Commissioner Commissioner 201 304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 2 MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone William Green Commissioner Commissioner 201 304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 3 MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone David Domas Commissioner Commissioner 201 304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 4 Ronald MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone Commissioner Commissioner VanHouten 201

Page 42 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 5 MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone Donald Parker Commissioner Commissioner 201 304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 6 MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone Steven Williams Commissioner Commissioner 201 District 7 304 E Grand Livingston Board of MI 7/25/14 Livingston Commissioner River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone Carol Griffith Commissioner - Chair 201 304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 8 MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone Dennis Dolan Commissioner Commissioner 201 304 E Grand Livingston Board of District 9 MI 7/25/14 Livingston River Ave. Ste. Howell Phone Gary Childs Commissioner Commissioner 201 Macomb Board of District 4 1 South Main Mount MI 7/25/14 Macomb Phone Dave Flynn Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 7 1 South Main Mount MI 7/25/14 Macomb Phone Don Brown Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens Macomb Board of District 11 1 South Main Mount MI 7/25/14 Macomb Phone Kathy Tocco Commissioner Commissioner 9th Floor Clemens District 1 1200 North Oakland Board of MI 7/25/14 Oakland Commissioner Telegraph Pontiac Phone Michael Gingell Commissioner - Chairman Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 2 MI 7/25/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Robert Hoffman Commissioner Commissioner Road 1200 North Oakland Board of District 3 MI 7/25/14 Oakland Telegraph Pontiac Phone Michael Spisz Commissioner Commissioner Road St. Clair Board of District 1 200 Grand MI 7/25/14 St. Clair Port Huron Phone Steven Simasko Commissioner Commissioner River Ave. St. Clair Board of District 2 200 Grand MI 7/25/14 St. Clair Port Huron Phone Karl Tomion Commissioner Commissioner River Ave. St. Clair Board of District 3 200 Grand Howard MI 7/25/14 St. Clair Port Huron Phone Commissioner Commissioner River Ave. Heidemann St. Clair Board of District 4 200 Grand MI 7/25/14 St. Clair Port Huron Phone Tom Teilly Commissioner Commissioner River Ave. St. Clair Board of District 5 200 Grand MI 7/25/14 St. Clair Port Huron Phone Jeffrey Bohm Commissioner Commissioner River Ave. St. Clair Board of District 6 200 Grand MI 7/25/14 St. Clair Port Huron Phone David Rushing Commissioner Commissioner River Ave. St. Clair Board of District 7 200 Grand MI 7/25/14 St. Clair Port Huron Phone Bill Gratopp Commissioner Commissioner River Ave.

Page 43 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

District 1 Lenawee Board of 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Commissioner- Adrian Phone David Stimpson Commissioner Street Vice Chair Lenawee Board of District 2 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Jack Branch Commissioner Commissioner Street Lenawee Board of District 3 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Jim Driskill Commissioner Commissioner Street Lenawee Board of District 4 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Cletus Smith Commissioner Commissioner Street Lenawee Board of District 5 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Karol "KZ" Bolton Commissioner Commissioner Street Lenawee Board of District 6 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Terry Collins Commissioner Commissioner Street District 7 Lenawee Board of 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Commissioner Adrian Phone John Tuckerman Commissioner Street - Chair Lenawee Board of District 8 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Ralph Tillotson Commissioner Commissioner Street Lenawee Board of District 9 301 N. Main MI 7/25/14 Lenawee Adrian Phone Chris Wittenbach Commissioner Commissioner Street 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 1 MAIN Kent Martinez- MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. Kratz BOX 8645 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 2 MAIN MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Dan Smith Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. BOX 8645 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 3 MAIN MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Alicia Ping Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. BOX 8645 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 4 MAIN MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Felicia Brabec Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. BOX 8645 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 5 MAIN Rolland MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. Sizemore Jr. BOX 8645 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 6 MAIN MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Ronnie Peterson Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. BOX 8645

Page 44 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 7 MAIN MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Andy LaBarre Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. BOX 8645 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 8 MAIN MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Yousef Rabhi Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. BOX 8645 220 NORTH Washtenaw Board of District 9 MAIN MI 7/25/14 Washtenaw Ann Arbor Phone Conan Smith Commissioner Commissioner STREET, P.O. BOX 8645 Defiance County President 500 Court OH 7/25/14 Defiance Defiance Phone Otto Nicely Commissioner Commissioner Street Suite A Defiance County 500 Court OH 7/25/14 Defiance Commissioner Defiance Phone James Harris Commissioner Street Suite A Defiance County 500 Court OH 7/25/14 Defiance Commissioner Defiance Phone Thomas Kime Commissioner Street Suite A Fulton County President 152 S. Fulton OH 7/25/14 Fulton Wauseon Phone Paul Barnaby Commissioner Commissioner St. Ste. 270 Fulton County 152 S. Fulton OH 7/25/14 Fulton Commissioner Wauseon Phone Bill Rufenacht Commissioner St. Ste. 270 Fulton County 152 S. Fulton OH 7/25/14 Fulton Commissioner Wauseon Phone Perry Rupp Commissioner St. Ste. 270 Hancock County 300 South OH 7/25/14 Hancock Commissioner Findlay Phone Phillip Riegle Commissioner Main Street Hancock County 300 South OH 7/25/14 Hancock Commissioner Findlay Phone Brian Robertson Commissioner Main Street 1853 Oakwood Henry County Avenue Henry Thomas Von OH 7/25/14 Henry Commissioner Napoleon Phone Commissioner County Office Deylen Complex 111 Madison Seneca County President OH 7/25/14 Seneca Street Suite Tiffin Phone Holly Stacy Commissioner Commissioner 3202 111 Madison Seneca County OH 7/25/14 Seneca Commissioner Street Suite Tiffin Phone Jeff Wagner Commissioner 3202 111 Madison Seneca County OH 7/25/14 Seneca Commissioner Street Suite Tiffin Phone Fred Zoeller Commissioner 3202 One Wood County Bowling Doris OH 7/25/14 Wood Commissioner Courthouse Phone Commissioner Green Herringshaw Square

Page 45 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not Ashland County President 110 Cottage OH 7/25/14 Ashland Ashland specified by Michael Welch SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Street SPP Not Ashland County 110 Cottage OH 7/25/14 Ashland Commissioner Ashland specified by Phil Leibolt SPP Contact Commissioner Street SPP Not Ashland County 110 Cottage OH 7/25/14 Ashland Commissioner Ashland specified by Barbara Queer SPP Contact Commissioner Street SPP Not 1205 E. Main OH 7/25/14 Ashland Ashland County Sheriff Sheriff Ashland specified by E. Wayne Risner SPP Contact Street SPP Not Belmont County President 101 West Main OH 7/25/14 Belmont St. Clairsville specified by Matt Coffland SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Street SPP Not Belmont County 101 West Main OH 7/25/14 Belmont Commissioner St. Clairsville specified by Ginny Favede SPP Contact Commissioner Street SPP Not Belmont County 101 West Main OH 7/25/14 Belmont Commissioner St. Clairsville specified by Mark Thomas SPP Contact Commissioner Street SPP 119 South Not Carroll County President OH 7/25/14 Carroll Lisbon Street Carrollton specified by Robert Wirkner SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Suite 201 SPP 119 South Not Carroll County OH 7/25/14 Carroll Commissioner Lisbon Street Carrollton specified by Jeffrey Ohler SPP Contact Commissioner Suite 201 SPP 119 South Not Carroll County OH 7/25/14 Carroll Commissioner Lisbon Street Carrollton specified by Thomas Wheaton SPP Contact Commissioner Suite 201 SPP Not Columbiana County President 105 South OH 7/25/14 Columbiana Lisbon specified by Jim Hoppel SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Market Street SPP Not Columbiana County 105 South OH 7/25/14 Columbiana Commissioner Lisbon specified by Tim Weigle SPP Contact Commissioner Market Street SPP Not Columbiana County 105 South OH 7/25/14 Columbiana Commissioner Lisbon specified by Michael Halleck SPP Contact Commissioner Market Street SPP 112 East Not Crawford County President Mansfield Douglas OH 7/25/14 Crawford Bucyrus specified by SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Street Suite Weisenauer SPP 301

Page 46 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

112 East Not Crawford County Mansfield OH 7/25/14 Crawford Commissioner Bucyrus specified by Jenny Vermillion SPP Contact Commissioner Street Suite SPP 301 112 East Not Crawford County Mansfield OH 7/25/14 Crawford Commissioner Bucyrus specified by Steve Reinhard SPP Contact Commissioner Street Suite SPP 301 627 Wheeling Not Guernsey County President Thomas OH 7/25/14 Guernsey Avenue - Suite Cambridge specified by SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Laughman 300 SPP 627 Wheeling Not Guernsey County Ernest Gardner OH 7/25/14 Guernsey Commissioner Avenue - Suite Cambridge specified by SPP Contact Commissioner Jr. 300 SPP 627 Wheeling Not Guernsey County OH 7/25/14 Guernsey Commissioner Avenue - Suite Cambridge specified by Dave Saft SPP Contact Commissioner 300 SPP Not Harrison County President 101 West OH 7/25/14 Harrison Cadiz specified by William Host SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Market Street SPP Not Harrison County 101 West OH 7/25/14 Harrison Commissioner Cadiz specified by Don Bethel SPP Contact Commissioner Market Street SPP Not Harrison County 101 West OH 7/25/14 Harrison Commissioner Cadiz specified by Dale Norris SPP Contact Commissioner Market Street SPP Not Jefferson County President 301 Market OH 7/25/14 Jefferson Steubenville specified by David Maple Jr. SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Street SPP Not Jefferson County 301 Market OH 7/25/14 Jefferson Commissioner Steubenville specified by Thomas Gentile SPP Contact Commissioner Street SPP Not Jefferson County 301 Market Dr. Thomas OH 7/25/14 Jefferson Commissioner Steubenville specified by SPP Contact Commissioner Street Graham SPP 101 North Main Not Monroe County President OH 7/25/14 Monroe Street Room Woodsfield specified by Carl Davis SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner 12 SPP 101 North Main Not Monroe County OH 7/25/14 Monroe Commissioner Street Room Woodsfield specified by Tim Price SPP Contact Commissioner 12 SPP 101 North Main Not Monroe County OH 7/25/14 Monroe Commissioner Street Room Woodsfield specified by John Pyles SPP Contact Commissioner 12 SPP

Page 47 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not Noble County President Courthouse OH 7/25/14 Noble Caldwell specified by Virgil Thompson SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Room 210 SPP Not Noble County Courthouse OH 7/25/14 Noble Commissioner Caldwell specified by Gary Rossiter SPP Contact Commissioner Room 210 SPP Not Noble County Courthouse OH 7/25/14 Noble Commissioner Caldwell specified by Stephen Bond SPP Contact Commissioner Room 210 SPP Not Richland County President 50 Park OH 7/25/14 Richland Mansfield specified by Gary Utt Sr. SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Avenue East SPP Not Richland County 50 Park OH 7/25/14 Richland Commissioner Mansfield specified by Edward Olson SPP Contact Commissioner Avenue East SPP Not Richland County 50 Park OH 7/25/14 Richland Commissioner Mansfield specified by Timothy Wert SPP Contact Commissioner Avenue East SPP 110 Central Not President OH 7/25/14 Stark Stark County Commissioner Plaza South Canton specified by Thomas Bernabei SPP Contact Commissioner Suite 240 SPP 110 Central Not Janet Weir OH 7/25/14 Stark Stark County Commissioner Commissioner Plaza South Canton specified by SPP Contact Creighton Suite 240 SPP 110 Central Not OH 7/25/14 Stark Stark County Commissioner Commissioner Plaza South Canton specified by Richard Regula SPP Contact Suite 240 SPP Not Tuscarawas County 125 East High New OH 7/25/14 Tuscarawas Commissioner specified by Belle Everett SPP Contact Commissioner Avenue Philadelphia SPP Not Washington County President 223 Putnam OH 7/25/14 Washington Marietta specified by Ronald Feathers SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Street SPP Not Washington County 223 Putnam OH 7/25/14 Washington Commissioner Marietta specified by David White SPP Contact Commissioner Street SPP Not Washington County 223 Putnam OH 7/25/14 Washington Commissioner Marietta specified by Timothy Irvine SPP Contact Commissioner Street SPP Not Wayne County President 428 West OH 7/25/14 Wayne Wooster specified by Ann Obrecht SPP Contact Commissioner Commissioner Liberty Street SPP Not Wayne County 428 West OH 7/25/14 Wayne Commissioner Wooster specified by Jim Carmichael SPP Contact Commissioner Liberty Street SPP

Page 48 of 49

Public Time or Date of County/ Attendees - State Official/Agency/Event Title Address City Type of Attendees - ETP Meeting Township non-ETP Host Interaction

Not Wayne County 428 West OH 7/25/14 Wayne Commissioner Wooster specified by Scott Wiggam SPP Contact Commissioner Liberty Street SPP

Page 49 of 49