Enslaved Labor in the Gang and Task Systems: a Case Study in Comparative Bioarchaeology of Commingled Remains
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 6-30-2016 Enslaved Labor In The aG ng and Task Systems: A Case Study In Comparative Bioarchaeology Of Commingled Remains William D. Stevens University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Stevens, W. D.(2016). Enslaved Labor In The Gang and Task Systems: A Case Study In Comparative Bioarchaeology Of Commingled Remains. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3415 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENSLAVED LABOR IN THE GANG AND TASK SYSTEMS: A CASE STUDY IN COMPARATIVE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF COMMINGLED REMAINS by William D. Stevens Bachelor of Arts University of Georgia, 1997 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2000 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Kenneth G. Kelly, Major Professor Carlina M. de la Cova, Major Professor Daniel C. Littlefield, Committee Member Kristrina A. Shuler, Committee Member Terrance L. Weik, Committee Member Molly K. Zuckerman, Committee Member Lacy Ford, Senior Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by William D. Stevens, 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is dedicated to my mother, Deane D. Stevens, without whose encouragement I would not have pursued my youthful interest in archaeology and physical anthropology. I also dedicate this to the memory of those who mentored and inspired me within biological anthropology, Karen R. Burns and Ted A. Rathbun. To Kenneth G. Kelly: you have inspired and encouraged me as a friend and mentor throughout my entire graduate career. To Jonathan M. Leader: you have supported and provided me with opportunities and guidance for years. To Cécile H. Kelly: your encouragement, advice, support, and friendship have made this happen! This study was made possible by the support of Daniel C. Littlefield and generous funding from the Institute for African American Studies at the University of South Carolina. Without your guidance, collaboration, and inspiration, Molly Zuckerman, I would not have conceived of a way to approach commingled bones with pXRF. To Kristrina Shuler: this study was inspired by your insight and encouragement. I am deeply indebted to you for the inspiration to begin the comparative study of these two economies. I express my gratitude to the Barbados Museum for permission to study the remains from Newton Plantation. iii I could not have completed this project without the support and encouragement of Coroner Gary Watts and the Richland County Coroner’s Office. To Coroner Kenneth Johnson of Georgetown County, South Carolina: your respect for these enslaved individuals and the recognition that they should be remembered are the only reason this study took place. To John Hathcock: your support and generosity made the biomechanical study possible. I am deeply grateful for all that the Department of Radiology at Auburn University College of Veterinary Sciences provided. To Terrell Lynch: you transitioned from your routine casework to archaeological bones without question. To Stephanie Crette: your patience, kindness and technical support was indispensible. To Carlina de la Cova: you are among my best colleagues, editors and advisors. I look forward to future collaboration. To Terry Weik: beginning with coursework, you have encouraged and given me the tools develop this project. To the Department of Anthropology at USC: especially Cat Keegan and Claudia Carriere, man we’ve been through a lot. Thank you endlessly. Lastly, to my family: Colleen, the next adventure is yours! Dad, thanks for listening, supporting, and always encouraging me! To John and Marcie: We did it! I mean “We”! To the modern-day residents of Hagley Plantation and to the descendant community of these individuals who lived and labored in the rice swamps on the Waccamaw, your collaboration, past, present, and future, will make this project a fulfillment of a true biohistorical study, and in the end, a fitting memorial. iv ABSTRACT This study designs and tests an approach intended to confront one of the major problems faced within biological anthropology, the commingling or mixing of human skeletal remains. The first goal of the study is to implement an approach to sorting mixed human remains in order that they can be made amenable to comparative study. Bioarchaeologists depend on an array of measures, preserved in the human skeleton, to assess the lifestyles and identity of past human groups. As many of these measures are preserved within the morphology of different bones, it is imperative that the association and context of remains are known for purposes of study. Frequently, the effects of nature, human activity, recovery by untrained personnel, and long-term storage or curation, cause commingling among samples of skeletal remains, meaning that they often remain unstudied. Many of these skeletal samples have the potential to provide valuable information about past human biology and culture within our recent evolution. This study implements a combined method approach using traditional morphological and osteological methods for sorting mixed assemblages of remains, combined with elemental analysis of bones using portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF) in order to test its efficacy in sorting a sample of human remains that were mixed and damaged by modern construction. Elemental analysis with pXRF has shown potential in recent studies, but has not yet been employed within bioarchaeology for the purpose of facilitating comparative studies. v The remains under study, the skeletons of enslaved African Americans who labored in the tidal rice fields of lowcountry South Carolina during the mid-nineteenth century, offer new insight into our understanding of the lifestyles and health of the enslaved in South Carolina. Following the implementation of an approach to sort these damaged remains into discrete individuals, this study then includes them in a comparative biocultural study designed to contribute to the growing body of temporal and regional studies of diasporic experiences of African, European, and Native American populations within the historic and formative periods of North America and the Caribbean. This study uses a biomechanical approach based on CT-scan derived images of human bone cross sections, in order to test historical questions using the sorted sample of human remains from a South Carolina rice plantation (Hagley Plantation) in a comparative framework with remains from a Barbadian sugar plantation (Newton Plantation). These two historical contexts involved characteristically-different labor regimes and social and economic arrangements according to historical sources. The current study tests questions based on the historical narrative using skeletal measures of functional adaptation designed to assess the effects of lifestyle and forced labor on these two groups within a comparative biohistorical framework. vi PREFACE This dissertation assesses the comparative biological impact of enslaved labor imposed upon African, Barbadian, and African American bondsmen and bondswomen within the context of plantation slavery. In order to assess the biological and historical evidence for these comparisons of lived experience, the study employs primary and secondary documentary evidence which contains racist and derogatory terminology common to the colonial and antebellum periods. These terms are unaltered in quotations from these sources and meant to convey their original meaning within contexts of social control and forced servitude. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT .........................................................................................................................v PREFACE ......................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. xi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................1 PROJECT GOALS AND DESIGN ............................................................................2 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE AND INTELLECTUAL MERIT .......................6 EXPECTATIONS AND QUESTIONS ......................................................................9 GANG VERSUS TASK LABOR .............................................................................10 HYPOTHESES .........................................................................................................11 STRUCTURE OF THE DISSERTATION ...............................................................13 CHAPTER 2: HISTORICAL AND BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT ...................15 BIOCULTURAL THEORY AND POLITICAL-ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES ......................................................................................................18