A Critical Examination of the Use of Cross-Sectional Geometry to Understand Cultural Change" (2018)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Current Archaeology in Kansas
Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 3 2002 Contents Title and Author(s) Page Empty Quarter Archaeology — Donald J. Blakeslee and David T. Hughes 1 What Lies Beneath: Archeological Investigation of Two Deeply Buried Sites in the Whitewater River Basin — C. Tod Bevitt 5 Ongoing Investigations of the Plains Woodland in Central Kansas — Mark A. Latham 9 A High-Power Use-Wear Analysis of Stone Tools Recovered from 14DO417 — William E. Banks 14 Archaeological Investigation of the Scott Site House (14LV1082) Stranger Creek Valley, Northeastern Kansas, A Progress Report — Brad Logan 20 Kansas Archeology Training Program Field School, 2002 — Virginia A. Wulfkuhle 25 Spatial Variability in Central Plains Tradition Lodges — Donna C. Roper 27 Hit and Run: Preliminary Results of Phase III Test Excavations at 14HO308, a Stratified, Multicomponent, Late Prehistoric Site in Southwest Kansas — C. Tod Bevitt 35 Building a Regional Chronology for Southeast Kansas — H.C. Smith 39 Geoarchaeological Survey of Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge, Northwestern Kansas: Application of GIS Method — Brad Logan, William C. Johnson, and Joshua S. Campbell 44 An Update on the Museum of Anthropology — Mary J. Adair 50 Research Notes: Ceramic Sourcing Study Grant Received — Robert J. Hoard 51 Wallace County Research — Janice A. McLean 52 Another Pawnee Site in Kansas? — Donna C. Roper 53 1 2 Empty Quarter Archaeology Donald J. Blakeslee, Wichita State University David T. Hughes, Wichita State University covered most of the upper end. Furthermore, wind erosion has also created a zone around the When a small survey fails to reveal any lake in which it would be nearly impossible to archaeological sites, it is unusual for someone locate sites even if they were present. -
Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here. -
Current Archaeology in Kansas
Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 6 2006 Contents Title and Author(s) Page The D. Heasty Cache Revisited – Donald J. Blakeslee 1 Eckles Collection from the Montana Creek Sites, Lovewell Locality, Jewell County, Kansas - Lauren W. Ritterbush 5 Archaeological Excavation Adjacent to Fort Osage - Jim D. Feagins 17 Ceramic Period Components at the Claussen Site, 14WB322 - Donna C. Roper 18 The 2005 Kansas Obsidian Sourcing Project - C. Tod Bevitt 23 Dyche Collection from the Fanning Site - Jim D. Feagins 30 The Phil Site House: Analysis of a Central Plains Tradition Lodge, Lovewell Reservoir, North-Central Kansas - Brad Logan and Sarah J. Meitl 31 An Archaeological Survey of Front Nine: Fort Hays Municipal Golf Course, Ellis County - Mark A. Latham, Susan Houghton, and C. Tod Bevitt 38 Searching for Dr. Doy?: Archaeology and the Underground Railroad in Douglas County, Kansas - Margaret C. Wood 40 A Small Survey on the Walnut River - David T. Hughes 46 Archaeological Survey in the Stranger Creek Basin-2005: A Progress Report - Brad Logan 54 Printing of this issue of Current Archaeology in Kansas was provided by the Kansas State Historical Society The D.Heasty Cache Revisited Donald J. Blakeslee Wichita State University Introduction Since the donation has enlarged the original In 1985, Dale Heasty found a lithic cache collection significantly, this brief report re- in Sumner County, Kansas. It was located in a small examines the cache and presents the pertinent data. pit on a site of unknown cultural affiliation near the Chikaskia River. His son, Don Heasty, eventually donated 28 specimens from the cache to Wichita State University. -
Anthropology Department Newsletter
Anthropology Department Newsletter SPRING 2014 From the Department Chair INSIDE THIS The SIU Department of Anthropology welcomed several new members this year. Herrin City Cemetery 2 Emily Ferré, became our office manager in the fall. After a period of shifting tempo- rary staff following the retirement of Tedi Thomas, Ms. Ferré returns a welcome Faculty 2 sense of congenial stability to the main office. Two anthropologists joined our faculty CFAR 7 this year. Dr. Jeremiah Scott is a bio-anthropologist specializing in osteology and evo- lution. His research and teaching carries on the department’s long established exper- Kincaid Mounds 9 tise in dental anthropology. Dr. Leila Monaghan is a linguistic anthropologist who joined us last fall in wake of the departure of Dr. Hofling (who retired) and Dr. Web- CAI 10 ster (who moved to University of Texas). Dr. Monaghan’s focus on Native American Graduate Students 12 languages continues the department’s well-established interest in the peoples and cul- tures of the Americas. The department also welcomes María Ansución Avendaño Graduates 22 García, an advanced doctoral student from the National Autonomous University of Awards and Honors 23 Mexico, who has come to Carbondale to advance her research on post-disaster com- munities. Working in conjunction with Dr. Roberto Barrios (our resident specialist in Contact Us 23 disaster studies) Ms. Garcia will be in Carbondale for the rest of the year. It has been a very productive year for SIU anthropology. We hope you enjoy this newsletter and the glimpse it provides into some of the fascinating and important work being done by SIU anthropologists, as well as the impressive achievements and independent research conducted by our students. -
The Archaeology of Slavery an D Plantation Life
The Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life Edited by South Carolina State Museum Columbia, South Carolina ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (H.lrcoort Brace Jovanov~ch.Publishers) Orlando San Diego New York London Toronto Montreal Sydney Tokyo The Ethnohistorical Approach to Slavery Frederick W. Law Jerome S. Handler INTRODUCTION The concept of plantation slavery as used in this chapter is limited to the form of social control and economic exploitation of non-European workers characteristic of the British Caribbean and American South during the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries. The development and longevity of plantation slavery differed in the British Caribbean and the American South, but the common origins of the slave popula- tions, patterns of development, and communality of material culture are sufficientto allow comparative analyses. The ideas expressed here draw heavily from our re- search in Barbados (Handler and Lange 1978), as well as other studies of plantation contexts in the British Caribbean and North America (e.g., Armstrong 1982; Druc- ker 1979; Fairbanks 1974; Lees 1980; Mathewson 1973; Otto 1975; Pulsipher and Goodwin 1982; Singleton 1980). Prior to 1970, historical documents generated most of our data regarding slavery and in our previous reports on the Barbados research (Handler 1972; Handler and Lange 1978, 1979; Lange 1972), we concluded that slavery cannot be identified through archaeological efforts alone. We reiterate this premise about the "archae- ology of slavery" at the outset. Within the ethnohistoric approach we review how research during the past decade has demonstrated the potential for the study of THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF 15 Lopvr~qhr0 1985 by r\c~dcrn~cPress. -
Enslaved Labor in the Gang and Task Systems: a Case Study in Comparative Bioarchaeology of Commingled Remains
University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 6-30-2016 Enslaved Labor In The aG ng and Task Systems: A Case Study In Comparative Bioarchaeology Of Commingled Remains William D. Stevens University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Stevens, W. D.(2016). Enslaved Labor In The Gang and Task Systems: A Case Study In Comparative Bioarchaeology Of Commingled Remains. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3415 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENSLAVED LABOR IN THE GANG AND TASK SYSTEMS: A CASE STUDY IN COMPARATIVE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF COMMINGLED REMAINS by William D. Stevens Bachelor of Arts University of Georgia, 1997 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2000 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Kenneth G. Kelly, Major Professor Carlina M. de la Cova, Major Professor Daniel C. Littlefield, Committee Member Kristrina A. Shuler, Committee Member Terrance L. Weik, Committee Member Molly K. Zuckerman, Committee Member Lacy Ford, Senior Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by William D. Stevens, 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is dedicated to my mother, Deane D. Stevens, without whose encouragement I would not have pursued my youthful interest in archaeology and physical anthropology. -
Archaeology of Northwestern Oklahoma: an Overview
ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA: AN OVERVIEW A Thesis by Mackenzie Diane Stout B.A., Wichita State University, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Anthropology and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 2010 ©Copyright 2010 by Mackenzie Stout All Rights Reserved ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA: AN OVERVIEW The following faculty members have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content, and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts with a major in Anthropology. _________________________________ David T. Hughes, Committee Chair _________________________________ Jay Price, Committee Member _________________________________ Peer Moore-Jansen, Committee Member DEDICATION To my father, my husband, my twin, and the rest of the family iii ABSTRACT This work will compile recent archaeological information about prehistoric inhabitants of northwest Oklahoma, the environments they occupied, and the archaeological studies that have informed us about them. The purpose is to construct an overview of the region that has been developed since the 1980s. Recommendations are offered about possible research objectives that might help tie this area in with larger studies of landscape archaeology, prehistoric adaptations to the area, and settlement systems. The primary contribution of the present study is to compile and make available in a single source some of the important information recently developed for Alfalfa, Blaine, Dewey, Ellis, Garfield, Grant, Harper, Kingfisher, Major, Woods, and Woodward counties. Studies in this area have added substantial information in the areas of pre-Clovis first Americans, the Clovis and other Paleoindian cultures, Archaic, and more recent inhabitants of the region. -
The Grand River Study Unit
The Grand River Study Unit..................................................................................8.1 Description of the Grand River Study Unit .......................................................8.1 Drainage .........................................................................................................8.1 Physiography ................................................................................................. 8.5 Climate........................................................................................................... 8.5 Landforms and Soils...................................................................................... 8.6 Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................ 8.6 Other Natural Resource Potential................................................................. 8.7 Overview of Previous Archeological Work ....................................................... 8.7 Inventory Projects ......................................................................................... 8.7 Test Excavation Projects ..............................................................................8.14 NRHP and NDSHSR ....................................................................................8.16 Major Excavation Projects ...........................................................................8.16 Other Work...................................................................................................8.17 Cultural/Temporal Affiliation........................................................................ -
Violence in the Midcontinent: a Comparative Analysis of Oneota Interactions with Mississippian and Central Plains Populations
VIOLENCE IN THE MIDCONTINENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONEOTA INTERACTIONS WITH MISSISSIPPIAN AND CENTRAL PLAINS POPULATIONS by Eric Daniel Roger Nordstrom Submitted to the Faculty of The Archaeological Studies Program Department of Archaeology and Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Eric D.R. Nordstrom All Rights Reserved ii VIOLENCE IN THE MIDCONTINENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONEOTA INTERACTIONS WITH MISSISSIPPIAN AND CENTRAL PLAINS POPULATIONS Eric D.R. Nordstrom, B.A. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 2016 Oneota is a name given to groups of Native Americans with a shared material culture originating in the upper Midwest around AD 900. Within a few hundred years, objects representing Oneota culture extended from Indiana to Kansas and from Missouri to Canada. This expansion led Oneota peoples to come into contact with Mississippian groups in the Central Illinois River Valley, and up to a few centuries later, with Central Plains populations in Nebraska, an area with less evidence for prehistoric violence than in the Mississippi River valleys where the Oneota developed. This thesis examines direct and indirect evidence of prehistoric violence from archaeological sites in Illinois and Nebraska that show evidence of intergroup conflict and habitation by Oneota, Mississippian, or Central Plains populations, or some combination thereof. Differences in political systems as well as subsistence and settlement practices may have contributed to varying incidence of violence between cultural groups in these areas. iii I would first like to thank Dr. Heather Walder for her direction and encouragement throughout the process of researching and writing this thesis, and for her comments on how to make it better. -
The Nature of Prehistory
The Nature of Prehistory In Colorado, mountains ascended past clouds and were eroded to valleys, salty seas flooded our land and were dried to powder or rested on us as freshwater ice, plants rose from wet algae to dry forests and flowers, animals transformed from a single cell to frantic dinosaurs and later, having rotated around a genetic rocket, into sly mammals. No human saw this until a time so very recent that we were the latest model of Homo sapiens and already isolated from much of the terror of that natural world by our human cultures' perceptual permutations and re flections. We people came late to Colorado. The first humans, in the over one hundred thousand square miles of what we now call Colorado, saw a landscape partitioned not by political fences or the orthogonal architecture of wall, floor, and roadway, but by gradations in game abundance, time to water, the supply of burnables, shelter from vagaries of atmosphere and spirit, and a pedestrian's rubric of distance and season. We people came as foragers and hunters to Colorado. We have lived here only for some one hundred fifty centuries-not a long time when compared to the fifty thousand centuries that the Euro pean, African, and Asian land masses have had us and our immediate prehuman ancestors. It is not long compared to the fifty million cen turies of life on the planet. We humans, even the earliest prehistoric The Na ture of Prehistory 3 societies, are all colonists in Colorado. And, except for the recent pass ing of a mascara of ice and rain, we have not been here long enough to see, or study, her changing face. -
Printable Version of 2006 Annual Report.Pub
2006 Annual Report 2006 Annual Report Table of Contents Chairman’s Foreword.................................................................................. 3 President’s Report ....................................................................................... 4 Program Highlights Research Grants and Hunt Postdoctoral Fellowships ...................... 6 International Programs .......................................................................12 International Symposia and Symposia Publications....................... 14 Other Foundation Programs and Activities...................................... 15 Individual Research Grants Dissertation Fieldwork Grants ........................................................... 17 Post-Ph.D. Research Grants .............................................................. 26 Hunt Postdoctoral Fellowships.......................................................... 30 Conference and Workshop Grants .......................................................... 31 International Collaborative Research Grants.......................................... 34 Wadsworth International Fellowships ..................................................... 35 Initiatives Grants........................................................................................ 38 Historical Archives Grants........................................................................ 39 Grant Making Statistics............................................................................. 40 Financial Statements................................................................................ -
National Register of Historic Places Inventory
Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS________ |NAME Historic Resources of the Big Bend Area, South Dakota (Partial HISTORIC Inventory: Prehistoric and Historic Archeological Sites) AND/OR COMMON Same LOCATION STREET & NUMBER __NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Pierre _2; VICINITY OF ^ STATE CODE COUNTY CODE South Dakota 46 Hughes, Hyde, Buffalo, 065, 069, 017, CLASSIFICATION Stanley, and Lyman 117, and 085 CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT -XpUBLIC —OCCUPIED .^AGRICULTURE. —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED J?GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY X.OTHER: recreation I AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) U.S. Department of the Army. Omaha District Corps of Engineers STREET & NUMBER 6014 U.S. Post Office and Courthouse______________________________ STATE VICINITY OF Nebraska LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. County Clerks, Courthouses REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. Hughes, Hyde, Buffalo-.- Stanley, and Lyman Counties STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Pierre. Hiehmore. Gami¥.allev» Fort Pierre, Kennebec South Dakota 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Appraisal of the Archeological Resources of the Big Bend Reservoir South Dakota (Huscher and McNutt 1958)______' _____ DATE ^.FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Nat ionai park Service, Midwest Archeological Center CITY. TOWN STATE T.lnrnln Nebraska 1-1 Form No.