DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sexual Health of Bisexual Men: Examining the Roles of Bisexual Minority Stress And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sexual Health of Bisexual Men: Examining the Roles of Bisexual Minority Stress And The Sexual Health of Bisexual Men: Examining the Roles of Bisexual Minority Stress and Substance Use Charles Joseph (CJ) Polihronakis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 ã 2019 CHARLES JOSEPH (CJ) POLIHRONAKIS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT THE SEXUAL HEALTH OF BISEXUAL MEN: EXAMINING THE ROLES OF BISEXUAL MINORITY STRESS AND SUBSTANCE USE Charles Joseph (CJ) Polihronakis According to public health research, bisexual men are at elevated risk for contracting STIs and HIV relative to other sexual minority groups (e.g., gay men, lesbian women) as well as heterosexual people; yet, no studies to date have examined contextual factors that may contribute to this sexual health trend. Using a minority stress theory framework, the present study tested the direct and indirect associations of anti-bisexual discrimination with risky sexual behaviors in a sample of 508 self-identified bisexual men (age range = 18 - 76), with internalized biphobia, bisexual identity concealment, and substance use mediating this relation. Bisexual identity centrality’s direct relations with internalized biphobia, bisexual identity concealment, and risky sexual behavior were also tested. A path analysis was used to analyze the data. Results indicated that anti-bisexual discrimination yielded significant direct positive associations with internalized biphobia, bisexual identity concealment, and risky sexual behavior. Internalized biphobia, but not bisexual identity concealment, yielded a significant direct association with substance use, which yielded a significant direct positive link with risky sexual behavior. Bisexual identity centrality yielded significant direct negative associations with both internalized biphobia and bisexual identity concealment, but it yielded a nonsignificant association with risky sexual behavior. Internalized biphobia also yielded a total indirect link with risky sexual behavior through the mediating role of substance use. Implications of these findings for clinical practice and future research with bisexual men are discussed. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………...…………………………. v CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………… 1 Minority Stress and Risky Sexual Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Men……………. 3 Bisexual Minority Stress…………………………………………………………………. 7 Purpose of the Present Study………………………………………………………….…. 9 CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………. 11 Sexual Minority Men and Risky Sexual Behavior……………………………………... 17 Drug Use………………………………………………………………………... 21 Alcohol Consumption…………………………………………………………... 24 Minority Stress Theory…………………………………………………………………. 26 Perceived Experiences of Heterosexist Discrimination……………………….... 32 Internalized Heterosexism……………………………………………………… 34 Sexual Identity Concealment………………………………………………….... 35 Sexual Identity Centrality………………………………………………………. 36 Limitations of Current Research………………………………………………... 38 Bisexuality……………………………………………………………………………… 38 Bisexual Minority Stress …………………………………………………………….…. 41 Anti-bisexual Discrimination………………………………………………….... 41 Bisexual Individuals as Sexually Irresponsible…...…………………..... 43 Interpersonal Hostility Towards Bisexual People……………………… 45 Instability and Illegitimacy of Bisexual Identity...................................... 47 Internalized Biphobia…………………………………………………………… 48 i Bisexual Identity Concealment…………………………………………………. 50 Bisexual Identity Centrality………………………………………………….…. 52 General Limitation in Current Bisexuality Research…………………………… 54 CHAPTER III: METHOD………………………………………………………………............ 56 Restatement of Research Question and Hypotheses……………………………………. 56 Participants………………………………………………………………........................ 57 Procedures………………………………………………………………......................... 59 Measures………………………………………………………………........................... 62 Perceived Anti-bisexual Discrimination………………………………...……… 62 Internalized Biphobia…………………………………………………………… 62 Bisexual Identity Concealment………………………………………...…...…... 63 Bisexual Identity Centrality ………………………...……………………….…. 63 Alcohol Consumption…………………………………………………………... 64 Drug Use………………………………………………………………............... 65 Risky Sexual Behavior………………………………………………………...... 66 Demographic Questionnaire……………………………………………………. 67 CHAPTER IV: RESULTS………………………………………………………………............ 68 Preliminary Analyses………………………………………………………………........ 68 Bivariate Correlations…………………………………………………………... 68 Exploratory Analyses………………………………………………………….... 69 Primary Analyses……………………………………………………………….............. 72 Test of Direct Relations………………………………………………………… 74 Test of Indirect Relations……………………………………………………….. 74 ii Test of Moderation……………………………………………………………… 75 Test of Rejection-Identification Model................................................................. 76 CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………....... 78 Overview of Findings………………………………………………………………....... 78 Bivariate Correlations.……………………………………………………….…. 78 Exploratory Analyses…………………………………………………………… 79 Direct Associations……………………………………………………………... 84 Indirect Associations……………………………………………………………. 88 Test of Moderation…………………………………………………………….... 90 Test of RIM........................................................................................................... 91 Implications for Practice and Research…………………………………………………. 91 Implications for Practice………………………………………………………... 91 Implications for Research………………………………………………………. 95 Strengths, Limitations, and Directions for Future Research……………………………. 99 Summary and Conclusions……………………………………………………………. 102 REFERENCES…………………............................…………………………………………... 104 APPENDICES…………………………………..........................………………………….…. 149 APPENDIX A: Demographic Table............................................................................... 149 APPENDIX B: Hypothesized Model.............................................................................. 151 APPENDIX C: Bivariate Correlation Table................................................................... 152 APPENDIX D: Risky Sexual Behavior by Substance Use Group................................. 153 APPENDIX E: Gender Identity ANOVA Table............................................................ 154 APPENDIX F: HIV Testing ANOVA Table.................................................................. 155 iii APPENDIX G: Social Class ANOVA Table.................................................................. 156 APPENDIX H: Hypothesized Model Results................................................................. 157 APPENDIX I: Total Indirect Relations (Hypothesized Model) .................................... 158 APPENDIX J: Moderation Model Results..................................................................... 159 APPENDIX K: Moderation Table.................................................................................. 160 APPENDIX L: Alternative Model Results..................................................................... 161 APPENDIX M: Total Indirect Relations (Alternative Model)....................................... 162 APPENDIX N: Informed Consent.................................................................................. 163 APPENDIX O: Participants’ Rights............................................................................... 164 APPENDIX P: Introduction Message............................................................................ 165 APPENDIX Q: Anti-Bisexual Experiences Scale.......................................................... 166 APPENDIX R: Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale – Identity Centrality.......... 168 APPENDIX S: Sexual Orientation Concealment Scale................................................. 169 APPENDIX T: Bisexual Identity Inventory – Internalized Binegativity Subscale........ 170 APPENDIX U: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test............................................. 171 APPENDIX V: Drug Abuse Screening Test.................................................................. 172 APPENDIX W: Sexual Risk Survey.............................................................................. 173 APPENDIX X: Demographic Questionnaire................................................................. 178 APPENDIX Y: Debriefing Message.............................................................................. 181 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to my mother, Patricia Ann Polihronakis, who has encouraged me to strive towards my academic and professional goals from a young age. Mom, you have always believed that I had the skills, aptitude, and resilience to do and be anything I wanted to in my life, even when the odds may have been stacked against me. You molded me into the man I am today, and for that I am eternally grateful. To my grandmother, Helen Megaloudis, who taught me that my happiness – in all areas of life – matters. As an adolescent, Greek immigrant in America, you were fearless and captivated by what life had to offer to you and the next generations of your family. You lived your life with a determination to excel that was paired with a vivacious charisma – a striking balance that I always admired and strive to embrace for myself. You may not be here to witness the end of my academic journey, but I carry your spirit and memories with me. I hope that I continue to make you proud, and I miss you every day. To my family members, Brittni, Matthew, David, Andrew, Crystal, Ti-Ti Linda, Tio
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Domestic Violence and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Relationships
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER RELATIONSHIPS WHY IT MATTERS Domestic violence is defined as a pattern of behaviors utilized by one partner (the batterer or abuser) to exert and maintain control over another person (the survivor or victim) where there exists an intimate and/or dependent relationship. Experts believe that domestic violence occurs in the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community with the same amount of frequency and severity as in the heterosexual community. Society’s long history of entrenched racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia prevents LGBT victims of domestic violence from seeking help from the police, legal and court systems for fear of discrimination or bias.1 DID YOU KNOW? • In ten cities and two states alone, there were 3,524 incidents of domestic violence affecting LGBT individuals, according to the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs 2006 Report on Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual and Transgender Domestic Violence.1 • LGBT domestic violence is vastly underreported, unacknowledged, and often reported as Intimidation something other than domestic violence.1 Coercion and Threats Making you afraid, Threatening to harm you, abusing pets, • Delaware, Montana and South Carolina explicitly family or friends, or him/ displaying weapons, herself, threatening to using tactics to exclude same-sex survivors of domestic violence out you. reinforce homophobic from protection under criminal laws. Eighteen control states have domestic violence laws that are Economic Abuse Emotional Abuse Preventing you from working, Putting you down, verbal gender neutral but apply to household members controlling all assets, interfering abuse, playing mind games, 2 with education, requiring you to humiliating you, reinforcing only.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender
    Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield Graduate School of Education & Allied GSEAP Faculty Publications Professions 7-2016 Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender Katherine M. Hertlein Erica E. Hartwell Fairfield University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/education-facultypubs Copyright 2016 Taylor and Francis. A post-print has been archived with permission from the copyright holder. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Bisexuality in 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/ 15299716.2016.1200510 Peer Reviewed Repository Citation Hertlein, Katherine M. and Hartwell, Erica E., "Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender" (2016). GSEAP Faculty Publications. 126. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/education-facultypubs/126 Published Citation Hertlein, Katherine M., Erica E. Hartwell, and Mashara E. Munns. "Attitudes Toward Bisexuality According to Sexual Orientation and Gender." Journal of Bisexuality (July 2016) 16(3): 1-22. This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Media Reference Guide
    media reference guide NINTH EDITION | AUGUST 2014 GLAAD MEDIA REFERENCE GUIDE / 1 GLAAD MEDIA CONTACTS National & Local News Media Sports Media [email protected] [email protected] Entertainment Media Religious Media [email protected] [email protected] Spanish-Language Media GLAAD Spokesperson Inquiries [email protected] [email protected] Transgender Media [email protected] glaad.org/mrg 2 / GLAAD MEDIA REFERENCE GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION FAIR, ACCURATE & INCLUSIVE 4 GLOSSARY OF TERMS / LANGUAGE LESBIAN / GAY / BISEXUAL 5 TERMS TO AVOID 9 TRANSGENDER 12 AP & NEW YORK TIMES STYLE 21 IN FOCUS COVERING THE BISEXUAL COMMUNITY 25 COVERING THE TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY 27 MARRIAGE 32 LGBT PARENTING 36 RELIGION & FAITH 40 HATE CRIMES 42 COVERING CRIMES WHEN THE ACCUSED IS LGBT 45 HIV, AIDS & THE LGBT COMMUNITY 47 “EX-GAYS” & “CONVERSION THERAPY” 46 LGBT PEOPLE IN SPORTS 51 DIRECTORY OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES 54 GLAAD MEDIA REFERENCE GUIDE / 3 INTRODUCTION Fair, Accurate & Inclusive Fair, accurate and inclusive news media coverage has played an important role in expanding public awareness and understanding of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) lives. However, many reporters, editors and producers continue to face challenges covering these issues in a complex, often rhetorically charged, climate. Media coverage of LGBT people has become increasingly multi-dimensional, reflecting both the diversity of our community and the growing visibility of our families and our relationships. As a result, reporting that remains mired in simplistic, predictable “pro-gay”/”anti-gay” dualisms does a disservice to readers seeking information on the diversity of opinion and experience within our community. Misinformation and misconceptions about our lives can be corrected when journalists diligently research the facts and expose the myths (such as pernicious claims that gay people are more likely to sexually abuse children) that often are used against us.
    [Show full text]
  • Bisexual People’S Experiences of and Ideas for Improving Services
    COMPLICATED? Bisexual people’s experiences of and ideas for improving services Sam Rankin James Morton and Matthew Bell 1 Acknowledgements The Equality Network would like to thank all the respondents to the survey for taking the time to contribute their experiences and ideas to better bisexual inclusion. We would also like to thank the authors of ‘The Bisexuality Report’1 for inspiring this work. Thanks also to our research assistant, Mel Maguire and all the people who provided feedback on the consultation draft and proof read the final draft. Thank you to the Scottish Government Equality Unit for funding this work. 1. Barker and others, 2012 3 Foreword Meg John Barker Back in 2012 when we produced The Bisexuality Report, my co-authors and I struggled with a few things. There was the lack of evidence regarding the experience of bisexual people in the UK – particularly those outside of the official ‘bisexual community’ – to support the findings from other countries. There was the absence of in-depth qualitative data from UK-based bisexual people to illustrate our points, particularly regarding experiences of services - which is so necessary if we are to fight for improvement in those areas. And there was the dearth of material anywhere regarding people whose bisexuality intersected with other marginalised identities and experiences. This in particular was something we subsequently hugely regretted giving such a small amount of space to, given its vital importance and the danger of suggesting shared experience where actually there is so much diversity. For these reasons – and so many more – I am extremely grateful to the Equality Network for producing ‘Complicated?’.
    [Show full text]
  • RNAO- Respecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
    Position Statement: Respecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity The Registered Nurses’ Association of Discrimination Threatens Health Ontario (RNAO) is committed to Through Violence and Social speaking out against discrimination and Exclusion social exclusion based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The health of LGBTTTIQQ people is compromised by direct assaults such as Ontario is home to between 400,000 and hate crimes, physical violence, and 1.25 million people who self-identify as verbal assaults as well as chronic stress lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, caused by stigmatization. transgender, Two-Spirit, intersex, queer, or questioning (LGBTTTIQQ). Making Discrimination Threatens Access to up five to ten per cent of Ontario’s Health Care population, those who are members of sexual or gender minority communities LGBTTTIQQ clients too often routinely experience threats to their experience barriers to inclusive and health and well-being because of their appropriate care because of practices by sexual orientation and/or gender identity. health care institutions and health professionals that are heterosexist and Sexual orientation refers to how we discriminatory. think of ourselves in terms of emotional, romantic, or sexual attraction to people Discrimination Threatens Quality of the same gender (gay, lesbian), the Work Environments other gender (heterosexual), or either gender (bisexual). Gender identity is Practice environments for LGBTTTIQQ one’s internal and psychological sense of nurses and other health-care oneself as female, male, both, or neither. professionals can be difficult due to heterosexism and discrimination from Discrimination against LGBTTTIQQ colleagues and clients. people may take the form of homophobia, biphobia, or transphobia. RNAO recommendations Heterosexism is the assumption that include: everyone is, or should be, heterosexual.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreclosing Fluidity at the Intersection of Gender and Sexual Normativities
    1 Foreclosing Fluidity at the Intersection of Gender and Sexual Normativities J. E. Sumerau University of Tampa Lain A. B. Mathers Indiana State University Dawne Moon Marquette University Binary gender and sexuality are socially constructed, but they structure thought at such a deep level that even those critical of sexism and homophobia can unwittingly reproduce them, with consequences felt most profoundly by those whose gender/sexual identity defy binary logic. This article outlines a generic pattern in the reproduction of inequality we call foreclosing fluidity, the symbolic or material removal of fluid possibilities from sexual and gender experience and categorization. Based on 115 responses from people who are both sexually and gender fluid and a reading of existing sociologies of gender and sexualities from a fluid standpoint, we demonstrate how lesbian/gay/straight, cisgender, and transgender women and men—regardless of intentions—may foreclose fluidity by mobilizing cisnormative, transnormative, heteronormative, and/or homonormative beliefs and practices. Examining patterns of foreclosing fluidity may provide insight into (1) the further incorporation of fluid people and standpoints into symbolic interactionism, and (2) the reproduction and persistence of sexual and gender inequalities. Keywords: cisnormativity, transnormativity, heteronormativity, homonormativity, transgender, bisexual, fluidity, sexualities When it comes to gender and sexuality, U.S. society constructs the appearance of a strict man-woman dichotomy. Gender and sexualities scholarship has expanded dramatically in the past 50 years, with researchers exploring numerous ways peo- ple enact and maintain notions of cisgender and transgender (Connell 2010), les- bian/gay/straight (Pfeffer 2014) womanhood (Avishai 2008), and manhood (Schrock Direct all correspondence to Lain A.
    [Show full text]
  • Phobias & -Isms
    Phobias & -isms: Some of the issues that impact rainbow communities specifically The negative attitudes expressed through cultural hate, individual and state violence, and discrimination directed towards bisexual and pansexual people. Biphobia is one specific result of monosexism. EG: assuming bisexual people will cheat in a relationship. Biphobia Beliefs, structures, and actions that promote the idea that someone’s authentic gender is the one they were assigned at birth. Cissexism often takes the form of deciding trans people’s experiences of their self-identified gender are not genuine. EG: healthcare services which do not treat trans people’s health Cissexism needs as a priority. Beliefs, structures, and actions that promote heterosexuality as the only valid sexual orientation. Heterosexism often takes the form of ignoring lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people, and ensures benefits and protections are granted automatically to heterosexual people that are denied to lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people. EG: research into partner and sexual violence which does not include lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people. Heterosexism The negative attitudes expressed through cultural hate, individual and state violence, and discrimination directed towards lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people. EG: assuming lesbians would be straight if they could find the right man or assuming gay men have HIV because gay sex is dirty. Homophobia Beliefs, structures, and actions that promote monosexuality (either exclusive heterosexuality or homosexuality) as the only legitimate or right sexual orientation. Monosexism causes the erasure of bisexual or other non-monosexual orientations. EG: research which assumes a woman in a relationship with another woman is a lesbian.
    [Show full text]
  • A Provider's Introduction to Substance Abuse Treatment for Lesbian, Gay
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment A Provider’s Introduction to Substance Abuse Treatment for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals A Provider’s Introduction to Substance Abuse Treatment for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 1 Choke Cherry Road Rockville, MD 20857 All material appearing in this volume may be reproduced or copied without permission from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA’s) Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) or the authors. Citation of the source is appreciated. The material appearing on pages 12 and 13 is under copyright and reproduced herein with the permission of the copyright holders. Before reprinting, readers are advised to determine the copy­ right status of all such material or to secure permission of the copyright holders. This publication was developed by SAMHSA’s CSAT under purchase order 99M004228. Edwin Craft, Dr.P.H., served as the CSAT Government Project Officer. Saul Levin, M.D., M.P.A., Access Consulting International, Inc., served as the Project Director for the development of the original draft document. This document was edited and prepared for publication by CSAT’s Knowledge Application Program (KAP) under contract number 270-99-7072 with JBS International, Inc., and The CDM Group. Karl White, Ed.D., served as the CSAT KAP Government Project Officer. The opinions expressed herein are the views of the authors and do not represent the official posi­ tion of CSAT, SAMHSA, or any other part of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Discrimination
    The impact of discrimination sexual violence & individuals who identify as lgbtq © National Sexual Violence Resource Center and Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape 2012. All rights reserved. This document was supported by Cooperative Agreement # 5VF1CE001751-03 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC. This project is supported by Grant No. 2010-SW-AX-0019 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. The content of this publication may be reprinted with the following acknowledgement: This material was reprinted, with permission, from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center’s publication entitled The impact of discrimination: Sexual violence & individuals who identify as LGBTQ. This guide is available by visiting www.nsvrc.org or use your smartphone to scan the QR Code (at left) for more information online. The impact of discrimination Sexual violence & individuals who identify as lgbtq ccording to the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, as of 2007 more than half of the U.S. A population is protected from anti-gay discrimination, nearly 40% live in jurisdictions that protect people who identify as transgender, and broad rights for same-sex couples increased more than eightfold in only three years (National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, 2007). Yet pervasive discrimination and hate crimes against individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ) persist in our homes, communities, workplaces and social institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bisexuality: a Trade Union Issue UNISON Is One of the UK's Largest Trade Unions, with More Than 1.3 Million Members
    Factsheet Bisexuality: a trade union issue UNISON is one of the UK's largest trade unions, with more than 1.3 million members. We represent all staff who provide public services in both the public and private sectors. UNISON has a long and proud history on equality. We recognise that bisexual people face particular issues at work and we strive to tackle biphobic prejudice and discrimination. Bisexual people are those who feel attraction to more than one gender. The 2010 Equality Act protects bisexual people (and lesbian, gay and heterosexual people) from discrimination because of their sexual orientation. Biphobia – the facts Biphobia is prejudice and discrimination against bisexual people. Research published in 2014 confirmed that bisexual workers experience even higher levels of discrimination than gay workers. Bisexual people are much more likely to feel they have to hide their sexual orientation at work than lesbians and gay men (very few heterosexual people hide their sexual orientation). Amongst bisexual workers, women faced greater prejudice than men. The research is The ups and downs of LGBs’ workplace experiences, published by Manchester Business School. These findings back up The Bisexuality Report 2012 by the Open University which showed that of all the larger sexual orientation groups, bisexual people have the worst mental health, including higher rates of depression, anxiety, self-harm and suicide. This is a directly linked to the high levels of biphobic prejudice and discrimination. Biphobia feeds off myths and stereotypes which range from bisexual people being untrustworthy, greedy and promiscuous to bisexuality being ‘just a phase’ or not really existing at all.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ2S Glossary of Terms
    1 LGBTQ2S Glossary of Terms Updated: February, 2020 2 About The 519 LGBTQ2S Glossary of Terms The 519 LGBTQ2S Glossary of Terms is by no means an exhaustive list of definitions related to our LGBTQ2S communities, but it has been carefully crafted in the hopes that it will aid in the facilitation of shared understandings around equity, diversity, inclusion, and awareness. Further, we recognize that language is constantly evolving. We will endeavour to update this resource periodically to reflect ongoing changes to the words and expressions that communities use to describe their identities and experiences. For any questions or suggestions regarding this glossary, please get in touch with: Education and Training, The 519 [email protected] You can also review The 519 LGBTQ2S Glossary of Terms on our website at: The519.org/education-training/glossary About The 519 The 519 is a City of Toronto agency, a community centre and a registered charity committed to the health, happiness and full participation of the LGBTQ2S communities in Toronto and beyond. The 519 has an innovative model of Service, Space and Leadership, with programs, direct service, capacity building, and advocacy initiatives that aim to make a real difference in people’s lives and promote inclusion, understanding and respect. Address: 519 Church St. Toronto ON M4Y 2C9 Website: The519.org Phone: 416-392-6874 Email: [email protected] 3 A G L S Accommodation Gay Lesbian Sex Ally Gender Sexual M Anti-Racism Genderqueer (or Sex-Positive Misogyny Asexual Non-Binary) Social Gender Binary
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/ Transgender
    Issue 2011-1 728-602 West Hastings Street, Vancouver BC V6B 1P2 Tel 604.633.2506 Fax 604.633.2507 www.endingviolence.org INCREASING THE SAFETY AND WELLNESS OF WOMEN IMPACTED BY VIOLENCE his year’s theme for National immigrant brides, and Janice Victims of Crime Awareness Ristock and Norma Timbang’s article TWeek (NVCAW) April 10 – discusses some of the challenges to 16, “Many Voices, Many Paths”, addressing relationship violence speaks to the wide range of people within lesbian/gay/ bisexual/trans- impacted by crime in our country gendered/queer (lgbtq) communities. and their experiences, as well as The work of Myrna Dawson’s team the range and experiences of those offers an analysis of national trends who work on their behalf. in intimate partner homicides in Canada from 1976 to 2001 while In keeping with this theme, EVA BC Leslie Ann Jeffrey and Barbara is pleased to offer readers this Sullivan examine sex worker policy Special Edition EVA BC Journal, in Canada and the lack of practical “Increasing the Safety and solutions to make women safe Wellness of Women Impacted by while showing some comparisons Violence”, showcasing research to what has happened in Australia relevant to workers in the anti- on this issue. violence sector. In this issue, the strong Aboriginal voices of Jessica It is hoped the varied and strong Yee and Dawn Martin Hill look, voices of the authors presented respectively, at the connection between sexual violence and will help to broaden and deepen knowledge in the field sex education, and restoring wellness strategies based on and add to the larger, collective voice of all those who traditional medicine.
    [Show full text]