DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern Montana Fire Zone Fire Danger Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern Montana Fire Zone Fire Danger Analysis Eastern Montana Fire Zone Fire Danger Analysis This Page Intentionally Left Blank Reviewed By: Craig Howels - Fire Management Officer Date Eastern Montana/Dakotas BLM District Prepared By: David Lee – Assistant Center Manager Date Miles City Interagency Dispatch Center Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Fire Danger Planning Area Inventory and Analysis ....................................................................... 1 A. Fire Danger Rating Areas (FDRAs) ............................................................................................................ 1 B. Selected Weather Stations ....................................................................................................................... 2 III. Fire Danger Analysis .................................................................................................................... 3 A. Fire Business Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 3 IV. Fire Danger Operating Procedures .............................................................................................. 4 A. Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................................ 4 1. Compliance with Weather Station Standards (NWCG PMS 426-3) ................................................ 4 2. Validation of Historic Fire Data ....................................................................................................... 4 3. Validation of Weather Data ............................................................................................................ 4 4. Preparation of FDAD ....................................................................................................................... 4 5. Update of FDAD .............................................................................................................................. 4 B. Seasonal Trend ......................................................................................................................................... 4 C. Daily Schedule .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix 1 – Evaluation of Landscape Data (Topography, Fuels, Climate) ........................................... 5 A. Topographic Information ......................................................................................................................... 5 1. Missouri and Yellowstone Rivers Corridor ..................................................................................... 5 2. Lower River Basin: Tongue, Powder, and Musselshell ................................................................... 5 3. Upper River Basin: Tongue and Powder ......................................................................................... 5 B. Vegetation Data ........................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Open Timber ................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Grassland ........................................................................................................................................ 6 C. Climate Data ............................................................................................................................................. 7 D. Delineation of FDRAs ................................................................................................................................ 8 1. North Fire Danger Rating Area: ...................................................................................................... 8 2. South Fire Danger Rating Area ....................................................................................................... 9 Appendix 2 – Weather Station Selection and Fire Occurrence ........................................................... 12 A. Weather Data ......................................................................................................................................... 12 1. North Fire Danger Rating Area ..................................................................................................... 12 i 2. South Fire Danger Rating Area ..................................................................................................... 14 B. Fire Occurrence Data .............................................................................................................................. 19 1. North Fire Danger Rating Area ..................................................................................................... 21 2. South Fire Danger Rating Area ..................................................................................................... 22 Appendix 3 – Correlation with Fire Occurrence ................................................................................. 23 A. Statistical Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 23 B. Breakpoints and Fire Business Thresholds ............................................................................................. 25 1. North Fire Danger Rating Area Preparedness Level Thresholds .................................................. 25 2. South Fire Danger Rating Area Preparedness Level Thresholds .................................................. 27 C. Dispatch Response Levels ....................................................................................................................... 29 1. North FDRA Dispatch Response Level Thresholds ........................................................................ 30 2. South FDRA Dispatch Response Level Thresholds ........................................................................ 31 D. Adjective Fire Danger Rating .................................................................................................................. 31 1. North Adjective Fire Danger Rating .............................................................................................. 32 2. South Adjective Fire Danger Rating .............................................................................................. 33 Appendix 4 – Preparedness Levels and Staffing Plan ......................................................................... 34 A. Preparedness Levels ............................................................................................................................... 34 B. Drawdown and Step-up .......................................................................................................................... 35 Appendix 5 – Initial Attack Response Plan ......................................................................................... 36 Table of Tables Table 1: Preparedness Level Breakpoints ............................................................................................................. 3 Table 2: Dispatch Level Breakpoints ..................................................................................................................... 3 Table 3: Adjective Fire Danger Rating Breakpoints ............................................................................................... 3 Table 4: South FDRA RAWS Comparison ............................................................................................................. 18 Table 5: Most Active Fire Years in Eastern Montana .......................................................................................... 20 Table 6: Fuel Model Fitness for Probability of a Fire Day ................................................................................... 23 Table 7: Fuel Model Fitness, Conditional Probability of a Large Fire Day ........................................................... 25 Table 8: Fuel Model Fitness, Conditional Probability of a Multi Fire Day ........................................................... 25 Table 9: North FDRA Preparedness Level Fire Business Thresholds ................................................................... 25 Table 10: South FDRA Preparedness Level Fire Business Thresholds ................................................................. 27 Table 11: Dispatch Response Levels .................................................................................................................... 30 Table 12: North Adjective Fire Danger Rating ..................................................................................................... 32 Table 13: South Adjective Fire Danger Rating ..................................................................................................... 33 Table 14: Preparedness Level Worksheet ........................................................................................................... 34 Table 15: Drawdown Staffing Levels Based on Preparedness Levels .................................................................. 35 ii Table of Figures Figure 1 - Map of Fire Danger Rating Areas .......................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2 - Map of Selected Weather
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Flathead Formation (Middle Cambrian) on the Perimeter
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 1978 Geology of the Flathead Formation (Middle Cambrian) on the perimeter of the Bighorn Basin, Beartooth Mountains, and Little Belt Mountains in Wyoming and Montana Joel A. Degenstein University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Degenstein, Joel A., "Geology of the Flathead Formation (Middle Cambrian) on the perimeter of the Bighorn Basin, Beartooth Mountains, and Little Belt Mountains in Wyoming and Montana" (1978). Theses and Dissertations. 71. https://commons.und.edu/theses/71 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY OF THE FLATHEAD FORMATION (MIDDLE CAMBRIAN) ON THE PERIMETER OF THE BIGHORN BASIN, BEARTOOTH MOUNTAINS, AND LITTLE BELT MOUNTAINS IN WYOMING AND MONTANA by Joel A. Degenstein Bachelor of Science in Geology, University of North Dakota, 1976 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota GEOLCGY LIBl(ARY August lJnivenitJ of Ncrtb Dakoll 1978 / . , '"\'';'.ft. ',I l This Thesis submicted by Joel A, Degenstein in partial fulfill­ ment of the requirements for the Degree of :·Iast:er of Science from ci:te University of ?forth Dakota is hereby app:.-c,·ed by the Faculty Advisory Col!llllittee under whom the work has been done.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Falls Montana Tourism Marketing Strategy
    Great Falls Montana Tourism Marketing Strategy April 2017 Executive Summary Great Falls Montana Tourism has begun an ambitious initiative to attract more visitors to the City of Great Falls, supporting its growth and bolstering its economy. Successful tourism attraction will depend on the highly-targeted engagement of Great Falls’ audience groups – people looking for a vacation or meeting experience centered around the assets Great Falls has to offer. Great Falls Montana Tourism has engaged Atlas to develop a comprehensive tourism marketing strategy for the city to guide tourism attraction tactics and campaigns for maximum impact. To develop an effective strategy, Atlas has: • Assessed Great Falls’ tourism strengths and weaknesses, and the opportunities and threats, to growing the tourism economy, along with an analysis of in-state and regional competing communities • Performed a national survey of professional meeting planners to gauge the perception of Great Falls as a meeting destination, including respondents that have actively planned meetings in Great Falls and those who have not • Researched Great Falls’ online reputation on popular travel websites, including TripAdvisor, Yelp, Google Maps, and Facebook • Interviewed Great Falls Montana Tourism leadership and reviewed the previous, internally-developed marketing plan and tourism brand package and its supporting research developed by North Star Destination Strategies From this foundation of analysis and research, Atlas developed the positioning statement for Great Falls as a tourism
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana
    Report of Investigation 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg 2015 Cover photo by Richard Berg. Sapphires (very pale green and colorless) concentrated by panning. The small red grains are garnets, commonly found with sapphires in western Montana, and the black sand is mainly magnetite. Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology MBMG Report of Investigation 23 2015 i Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of Occurrences ..................................................................................................7 Selected Bibliography of Articles on Montana Sapphires ................................................... 75 General Montana ............................................................................................................75 Yogo ................................................................................................................................ 75 Southwestern Montana Alluvial Deposits........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Rock Creek sapphire district ........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Dry Cottonwood Creek deposit and the Butte area ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Two High Altitude Game Trap Sites in Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1974 Two High Altitude Game Trap Sites in Montana Bonnie Jean Hogan The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hogan, Bonnie Jean, "Two High Altitude Game Trap Sites in Montana" (1974). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 9318. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/9318 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWO HIGH ALTITUDE. GAME TRAP SITES IN MONTANA By Bonnie Herda Hogan B.A., University of Montana, 1969 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1974 Approved by: v s'sr~) s / '/ 7 / y ■Zu.£&~ fi-'T n Chairman, Board''of Examiners Gra< ie Schoo/1 ? £ Date UMI Number: EP72630 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Publishing UMI EP72630 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Prehistoric Land Use Patterns in the Tongue River Valley, North of Decker, Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1997 Analysis of prehistoric land use patterns in the Tongue River Valley, north of Decker, Montana Glenn A. Walter The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Walter, Glenn A., "Analysis of prehistoric land use patterns in the Tongue River Valley, north of Decker, Montana" (1997). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1540. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1540 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of IVIONTANA Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published ^vorks and reports. ** Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature Date ie Çpl. im Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. AN ANALYSIS OF PREHISTORIC LAND USE PATTERNS IN THE TONGUE RIVER VALLEY. NORTH OF DECKER, MONTANA by Glenn A. Walter B.A. The University of Montana, 1992 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The University of Montana 1996 Appôved b y Chairperson Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP36188 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL U SERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana State Parks Guide Reservations for Camping and Other Accommodations: Toll Free: 1-855-922-6768 Stateparks.Mt.Gov
    For more information about Montana State Parks: 406-444-3750 TDD: 406-444-1200 website: stateparks.mt.gov P.O. Box 200701 • Helena, MT 59620-0701 Montana State Parks Guide Reservations for camping and other accommodations: Toll Free: 1-855-922-6768 stateparks.mt.gov For general travel information: 1-800-VISIT-MT (1-800-847-4868) www.visitmt.com Join us on Twitter, Facebook & Instagram If you need emergency assistance, call 911. To report vandalism or other park violations, call 1-800-TIP-MONT (1-800-847-6668). Your call can be anonymous. You may be eligible for a reward. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks strives to ensure its programs, sites and facilities are accessible to all people, including those with disabilities. To learn more, or to request accommodations, call 406-444-3750. Cover photo by Jason Savage Photography Lewis and Clark portrait reproductions courtesy of Independence National Historic Park Library, Philadelphia, PA. This document was produced by Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks and was printed at state expense. Information on the cost of this publication can be obtained by contacting Montana State Parks. Printed on Recycled Paper © 2018 Montana State Parks MSP Brochure Cover 15.indd 1 7/13/2018 9:40:43 AM 1 Whitefish Lake 6 15 24 33 First Peoples Buffalo Jump* 42 Tongue River Reservoir Logan BeTableaverta ilof Hill Contents Lewis & Clark Caverns Les Mason* 7 16 25 34 43 Thompson Falls Fort3-9 Owen*Historical Sites 28. VisitorMadison Centers, Buff Camping,alo Ju mp* Giant Springs* Medicine Rocks Whitefish Lake 8 Fish Creek 17 Granite11-15 *Nature Parks 26DisabledMissouri Access Headw ibility aters 35 Ackley Lake 44 Pirogue Island* WATERTON-GLACIER INTERNATIONAL 2 Lone Pine* PEACE PARK9 Council Grove* 18 Lost Creek 27 Elkhorn* 36 Greycliff Prairie Dog Town* 45 Makoshika Y a WHITEFISH < 16-23 Water-based Recreation 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Musselshell River Acquisition Projrect Environmental Assessement
    Environmental Assessment Lower Musselshell River Acquisition Project DOI-BLM-MT-C020-2021-0057-EA February 26, 2021 MTM-111418 Miles City Field Office 111 Garryowen Road Miles City, Montana 59301 Lewistown Field Office 920 NE Main Lewistown, Montana 59457 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................................................. 6 4 Consultation and Coordination ....................................................................................................... 11 5 List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 12 Appendix A: List of Preparers ................................................................................................................. 13 Appendix B: Table of Issues and Resources Considered ...................................................................... 14 Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 22 Appendix D: List of References ............................................................................................................... 23 Appendix E: Maps
    [Show full text]
  • Ashland Post Fire Landscape Assessment 2014 2
    Ashland Post Fire Landscape United States Assessment Forest Depart ment of Service Agriculture Ashland Ranger District Custer National Forest Powder River and Rosebud Counties, MT May 2014 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Ashland Post Fire Landscape Assessment 2014 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Ashland Ecological and Social/Economic Niche .............................................................................. 11 1.1.1 Livestock Grazing ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.1.2 Mixed Prairie and Forest ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Climate Change in Montana 6 Semester Credits
    Combined Syllabi | 2019 Cycle the Rockies- Energy and Climate Change in Montana 6 semester credits Academic Credit All courses offered by the Wild Rockies Field Institute are accredited through the University of Montana with administrative support from the School for Extended and Lifelong Learning. Academic oversight of each Wild Rockies Field Institute course comes from University of Montana departmental leadership and faculty. Accepted students have the potential to earn credit in two academic courses (3 credits each): Environmental Studies 395- Field Studies of Climate Change in Montana Natural Resources Science & Management 321- Field Studies of Energy Systems in Montana Estimated Course Contact Hours and Academic Work Time The time ranges below describe daily student requirements for participation on a WRFI course. These ranges are approximate and vary with assignments, field learning opportunities, and environmental conditions: Instructional Contact Hours- 2-4 hours of formal classroom-style work per course day. This includes lectures, discussion-based classes, guest speaker presentations, individual meetings with course instructors or teaching assistants, and academic exercises not involving field exploration. Field / Laboratory Contact Hours- 2-4 hours per course day. This includes field explorations and exercises, site visits, local guest speakers, and opportunistic instruction as relevant examples of course concepts and issues arise. Individual Academic Work- 2-6 hours per day. This includes completing required readings, individual writing assignments, research investigation associated with course assignments, reviewing peer work. * The average amount of Instructional and Field / Laboratory contact time is 5.5 hours per day. * Each 3-credit WRFI course is developed with approximately 67 contact hours. Course Dates Pre-Field Expedition Coursework June 12 - June 18, 2019 Field Expedition June 19 - July 16, 2019 Post-Field Expedition Coursework July 17 - July 25, 2019 1 Instructors Matt Frank- M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • LYNN KELTING-GIBSON 324 South 5Th Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 (406) 585-2702 [email protected]
    1 LYNN KELTING-GIBSON 324 South 5th Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 (406) 585-2702 [email protected] EDUCATION Ed.D. Curriculum and Instruction, 2003 Montana State University – Bozeman, Montana Dissertation: Pre-service Teachers’ Planning and Preparation Practices: A Comparison of Lesson and Unit Plans Developed Using the Backward Design Model and a Traditional Model. M.S. Secondary School Administration, 1991 Montana State University – Bozeman, Montana B.S. Elementary Education and Physical Education and Health (K-12), 1991 Eastern Montana College – Billings, Montana B.A. Vocational Home Economics / Family Life (7-12), 1983 Concordia College – Moorhead, Minnesota TEACHING EXPERIENCE 2010 – present Associate Professor of Classroom Assessment Montana State University – Bozeman Courses Taught EDU 101US – TEACHING AND LEARNING EDU 382 – ASSESSMENT, CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION EDCI 360 – FOUNDATIONS OF ASSESSMENT EDCI 504 – ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION – online course EDCI 588 – PREPARING FOR A STANDARDS-BASED ASSESSMENT SYSTEM 1999 – 2010 Adjunct Assistant Professor/GraduateTeaching Assistant Montana State University – Bozeman Courses Taught EDCI 588 – MENTORING NOVICE TEACHERS – online course EDCI 554 – CURRICULUM DESIGN, PEDAGOGY AND ASSESSMENT – online course EDCI 540 – AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES FOR EDUCATORS – online course EDCI 535 – NEEDS ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION EDCI 504 – ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION – online course N504 – ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION (Nursing) – online course EDEL 414 – PROFESSIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Trees and Shrubs for Montana
    Conservation Trees and Shrubs for Montana Montana mt.nrcs.usda.gov Introduction When you are contemplating which tree or shrub species to plant, your first thought might be, “Will this plant thrive here?” You will want to know if the plant will tolerate the temperatures, moisture, and soil conditions of the area. This publication focuses on identifying and describing trees and shrubs capable of tolerating Montana’s severe climatic and environmental conditions, the site conditions where they are best adapted to grow, and some of the benefits each tree and shrub provides. When looking at each of the provided attributes, consider these two points. First, these characteristics and traits are approximations, and variability within a species is quite common. Second, plant performance varies over time as a plant grows and matures. For example, even “drought tolerant” species require adequate moisture until their root systems become well established. Landowners and managers, homeowners, and others plant trees and shrubs for many reasons, including: windbreaks for livestock protection and crop production, shelterbelts for homes and farmsteads to reduce wind speed and conserve energy usage, living snow fences to trap and manage snow, hedgerows as visual and noise screens, landscaping for beautification around homes and parks, wildlife habitat and food, blossoms for pollinators such as bees, streamside and wetland restoration, reforestation following timber harvest or wildfire, and fruit and berries for human use to name just a few. Montana encompasses 93.3 million acres with temperature extremes ranging from -50 degrees F in northeast Montana, to 110 degrees F in summer in southcentral Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • References for Montana Plant Community Field Guide
    References For Montana Plant Community Field Guide Achuff, P. L. 1989. Old-growth forests of the Canadian Rocky Mountain National Parks. Natural Areas Journal 9:12-26. Agee, J. K., and J. Kertis. 1987. Forest types of the north Cascades National Park Service complex. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1520-1530. Aiken, S. G., M. J. Dallwitz, C. L. McJannet, and L. L. Consaul. 1996 onwards. Festuca of North America: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval, 2nd Version: URL, April 1998. http://biodiversity.uno.edu/delta/. Aiken, S.G. and S. J. Darbyshire. 1990. Fescue Grasses of Canada. Agriculture Canada Publication 1844/E. Aldous, A. E., and H. L. Shantz. 1924. Types of vegetation in the semiarid portion of the United States and their economic significance. Journal of Agricultural Research. 28(2):99-125. Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-123, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp. Alexander, R. R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant communities in the Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-123. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 105 pp. Alexander, R. R., G. R. Hoffman, and J. M. Wirsing. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Medicine Bow National Forest in southeastern Wyoming: A habitat type classification. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-271. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. 39 pp. Antos, J. A. 1977. Grand fir (Abies grandis (Douglas) Forbes) forests of the Swan Valley, Montana.
    [Show full text]