DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Army BRAC 2005 Environmental Condition of Property Report Fort Monmouth Monmouth County, New Jersey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Army BRAC 2005 Environmental Condition of Property Report Fort Monmouth Monmouth County, New Jersey U.S. Army BRAC 2005 Environmental Condition of Property Report Fort Monmouth Monmouth County, New Jersey Final 29-January-2007 Final ECP Report – Fort Monmouth – 29-Jan-07 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations.........................................................................................viii Definitions ......................................................................................................................xii 1 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................1-1 1.1 Site Description and Historical Use................................................................1-1 1.1.1 Main Post................................................................................................1-2 1.1.2 Charles Wood Area ................................................................................1-3 1.2 Areas Assessed for Environmental Concern..................................................1-4 1.2.1 Installation Restoration Program.............................................................1-4 1.2.2 Military Munitions Response Program ....................................................1-4 1.2.3 Compliance Cleanup ..............................................................................1-5 1.2.4 Previous Environmental Investigations ...................................................1-5 1.2.5 Hazardous Substances...........................................................................1-6 1.2.6 USTs/ASTs .............................................................................................1-6 1.2.7 Non-UST/AST Petroleum Storage ..........................................................1-7 1.2.8 PCBs.......................................................................................................1-7 1.2.9 Asbestos-Containing Materials ...............................................................1-8 1.2.10 Lead-Based Paint ...................................................................................1-8 1.2.11 Radiological Materials.............................................................................1-8 1.2.12 Radon .....................................................................................................1-9 1.2.13 Munitions and Explosives .....................................................................1-10 1.2.14 Surrounding Properties.........................................................................1-10 1.3 Recognized Environmental Conditions ........................................................1-11 1.4 Conclusions .................................................................................................1-11 2 Purpose.................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 General ..........................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Scope.............................................................................................................2-2 2.3 Limitations......................................................................................................2-3 2.4 Report Organization.......................................................................................2-3 3 Survey Methodology .............................................................................................3-1 3.1 Development of Study Sections.....................................................................3-1 3.2 Visual Site Inspection.....................................................................................3-1 3.3 Aerial Photography Analysis ..........................................................................3-2 3.4 Records Review.............................................................................................3-5 3.4.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources...............................................3-5 3.4.1.1 Main Post Standard Environmental Record Results ...........................3-6 3.4.1.2 Charles Wood Standard Environmental Record Results...................3-17 3.4.2 Additional Record Sources ...................................................................3-29 3.5 Interviews.....................................................................................................3-30 3.6 Data Management .......................................................................................3-31 4 Property Description..............................................................................................4-1 4.1 Installation Location and Description .............................................................4-1 4.1.1 Main Post................................................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Charles Wood Area ................................................................................4-2 4.2 Historic Land Use...........................................................................................4-2 4.2.1 Main Post................................................................................................4-2 29-Jan-07 i Final ECP Report – Fort Monmouth – 29-Jan-07 4.2.2 Charles Wood Area ................................................................................4-3 4.2.3 Historic Deed Records............................................................................4-3 4.2.4 Summary ................................................................................................4-3 4.3 Facility History................................................................................................4-4 4.3.1 Operational History .................................................................................4-4 4.3.2 Process Descriptions (Industrial Facilities Only) ...................................4-10 4.3.2.1 Main Post ..........................................................................................4-10 4.3.2.1.1 Printing and Photoprocessing ......................................................4-10 4.3.2.1.2 Surface Coating ...........................................................................4-11 4.3.2.1.3 Storage Areas..............................................................................4-13 4.3.2.1.4 Medical, Dental, and Veterinary Operations ................................4-16 4.3.2.1.5 Waste Treatment and Disposal....................................................4-21 4.3.2.1.6 Laboratory/Research Facilities ....................................................4-23 4.3.2.1.7 Maintenance and Engineering Shops ..........................................4-28 4.3.2.1.8 Pool Chlorinator Facility ...............................................................4-31 4.3.2.1.9 Commercial..................................................................................4-31 4.3.2.2 Charles Wood Area...........................................................................4-32 4.3.2.2.1 Printing and Photoprocessing ......................................................4-32 4.3.2.2.2 Surface Coating ...........................................................................4-33 4.3.2.2.3 Storage Tanks..............................................................................4-34 4.3.2.2.4 Maintenance & Engineering Shops..............................................4-35 4.3.2.2.5 Waste Treatment and Disposal....................................................4-35 4.3.2.2.6 Laboratory/Research Facilities ....................................................4-35 4.3.2.2.7 Recreation Operations .................................................................4-40 4.3.3 Occupancy, Lease and Easement Records..........................................4-40 4.3.4 Range Operations.................................................................................4-41 4.4 Installation Utilities (Historic and Current) ....................................................4-45 4.4.1 Water Systems .....................................................................................4-45 4.4.2 Industrial and Sanitary Sewers and Treatment Plants ..........................4-46 4.4.2.1 Current Sewage Operation................................................................4-46 4.4.2.2 Historic FTMM Sewage Operation ....................................................4-46 4.4.2.3 Building 2700 Sewage Discharge History .........................................4-48 4.4.3 Stormwater System...............................................................................4-49 4.4.3.1 Boiler Blowdown Discharges History.................................................4-49 4.4.3.2 Vehicle Washwater Operations .........................................................4-50 4.4.3.3 Scrubber Discharges to Storm Sewer ...............................................4-50 4.4.4 Electrical System ..................................................................................4-50 4.4.4.1 Substations .......................................................................................4-51 4.4.4.2 Uninterruptible Power Supply............................................................4-52 4.4.4.3 Emergency Generators .....................................................................4-54 4.4.4.4 Heating Systems ...............................................................................4-56 4.4.4.5 Boiler Plants ......................................................................................4-56 4.5 Environmental Setting – Natural and Physical Environment ........................4-57
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teacher's Guide
    Madrid, MADRID’S ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS an open book MADRID’S ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN Teacher’s Guide ESO + High school students AUTORA: Clara Salvador Lozano 1 Madrid, MADRID’S ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS an open book CONTENTS ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ ؁ 1. PRESENTATION .............................................................................................................. 3 2. LOCATION ....................................................................................................................... 4 3. RULES FOR VISITORS ................................................................................................... 5 4. HISTORICAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................ 6 4.1. THE ENLIGHTMENT PERIOD. CHARLES III. ................................................. 6 4.2. ROYAL BOTANIC EXPEDITIONS .................................................................... 9 5. BOTANICAL GARDEN ................................................................................................. 11 5.1. CONCEPT AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................... 11 5.2 MATERIAL .......................................................................................................... 12 5.3. DISTRIBUTION IN TERRACES AND REMARKABLE SPOTS .................... 13 5.4. HISTORY OF THE GARDEN ............................................................................ 17 6. VISITING THE GARDENS...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cocktails Brunch
    BRUNCH 7:00am - 4:00pm | Saturday - Sunday HOUSE ITEMS CAGE FREE Lamb Burger Adega Frittata pickled onion, tomato jam, labnah cheese, harissa-tzatziki, asparagus, honey ale onions, jamón serrano + tomato manchego | 15 arugula + brioche | 16 CLE Frittata Adega Morning Burger maple-smoked bacon, local sausage, scallions, aged cheddar + romesco | 15 fried egg, boursin cheese, pickled onion, sweet basil aioli + arugula | 15 2 Eggs the Way You Like Them choose your meat, side, and toast T- 9 +maple-smoked bacon, local sausage or chicken apple sausage veal cutlet, fried egg, harissa-lemon jam, arugula, +adega potato, fruit cup or greek salad honey-ale onion mustard + sesame brioche roll | 16 +wheat, rye, tuscan or gluten-free | 14 Salade Lyonnaise v BENEDICT frisée, baby spinach, arugula, egg, pancetta crisp, ciabatta, parmesan + sherry-mustard vinaigrette | 11 Ibérico secreto ibérico, poached egg, romesco, hollandaise, Bulgur + Shrimp arugula + parmesan polenta cake | 15 chickpeas, kumato, cucumber, piquillo pepper, feta, parsley, arugula, pine honey brûlée lemon + greek vinaigrette | 16 Jumbo Lump Crab lump crab, avocado, kumato, baby spinach, poached egg, Steel-Cut Oats v sauce maltaise + parmesan polenta cake | 16 berries, banana, golden raisin + brown sugar | 12 Chorizo Parfait v picante gravy, ciabatta, poached egg, arugula, citrus + evoo | 14 greek yogurt, italian honey, apricot-pistachio granola + berries | 11 Ham traditional ham, poached egg, hollandaise + english muffin | 14 SIGNATURE STACKED FLAPS OR BRIOCHE FRENCH TOAST CROQUE MADAMES
    [Show full text]
  • Niedersachsen European Honeydew Honeys
    Niedersächsisches Landesamt Niedersachsen für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit European Honeydew Honeys Werner von der Ohe, Martina Janke, Katharina von der Ohe LAVES Institut für Bienenkunde Celle Honeydew honeys are well-known in European countries. Especially in Germany they can achieve quite high prices. Honeydew is a excretion of plant sucking insects with a high sugar content. Contrary to most nectar honeys honeydew Honeydew producers honeys have red brown to dark brown colour, a Most honeydew producers strong, herb-malty aroma, high electrical belong to the insect group of conductivity, lower amount of fructose and Hemiptera. glucose, significant higher amounts of Especially Coccina, Aphidina, Physokermes hemicryphus on spruce tree oligosaccharides as well as microscopic visible as well as Auchenorrhyncha are honeydew elements. important in European countries. Honeydew production Beside floral and extrafloral nectar honeydew is an other source used by bees to produce honey. With their mouthparts honeydew producing insects stick into the phloem an drink the phloem sap. They need Cinara pilicornis on spruce tree Honeydew from Physokermes hemicryphus especially the higher molecules which are in a lower on spruce tree concentration in the phloem sap. Smaller molecules like water and sugars are in some aphids filtered through membranes just after intake and transported directly to the end of the digestive tract. Bigger molecules like peptides etc. will be digested in the midgut supported by bacteria. Phloem sap will be transferred to honeydew by enzymes of aphids and their endosymbionts during digestion. Honeydew can occur as a drop at the anus of the insects (e.g. Physokermes hemicryphus) or will be squirt off (egg Honeydew from Physokermes spec.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL BEVERAGES NATURAL BEVERAGES Volume 13: the Science of Beverages
    NATURAL BEVERAGES NATURAL BEVERAGES Volume 13: The Science of Beverages Edited by ALEXANDRU MIHAI GRUMEZESCU ALINA MARIA HOLBAN An imprint of Elsevier Woodhead Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier The Officers’ Mess Business Centre, Royston Road, Duxford, CB22 4QH, United Kingdom 50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www. elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Non-Timber Forest Products for Forest Management Planning in Europe
    Current Forestry Reports (2020) 6:309–322 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-020-00130-7 FOREST POLICY, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL RESEARCH (A TOPPINEN, SECTION EDITOR) Modelling Non-timber Forest Products for Forest Management Planning in Europe Jari Miina1 & Mikko Kurttila1 & Rafael Calama2 & Sergio de-Miguel3,4 & Timo Pukkala5 Accepted: 13 August 2020 / Published online: 9 October 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Purpose of Review The increased popularity and commercial use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) calls for the develop- ment of models for NTFPs to include their predicted yields in forest management planning and to evaluate the potential of multi- functional forest management. This study assesses and discusses the current state of the art and trends in NTFP yield modelling in Europe and the integration of the models in multi-functional forest management planning at different spatial scales. Recent Findings Climate-sensitive empirical yield models already exist not only for a variety of NTFPs that are economically important to forest owners (e.g. cork and pine nuts) but also for wild-gathered berries and mushrooms, the harvesting of which cannot be controlled by the forest landowner in all European countries. Several studies on multi-functional forest management planning consider the economic profitability of the joint production of timber and NTFP. Harvesting NTFPs can create signif- icant additional incomes for forest owners, compared with timber production only. However, maximizing the economic returns from the joint production of timber and NTFPs often calls for changes in forest management practices. Summary Continued efforts in modelling and predicting the yields of NTFPs have enabled forest managers to further expand the analyses of multi-functional forest planning and management in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toxic Impact of Honey Adulteration: a Review
    foods Review The Toxic Impact of Honey Adulteration: A Review Rafieh Fakhlaei 1, Jinap Selamat 1,2,*, Alfi Khatib 3,4, Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis 2,5 , Rashidah Sukor 2 , Syahida Ahmad 6 and Arman Amani Babadi 7 1 Food Safety and Food Integrity (FOSFI), Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; rafi[email protected] 2 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (A.F.A.R.); [email protected] (R.S.) 3 Pharmacognosy Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia; alfi[email protected] 4 Faculty of Pharmacy, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60155, Indonesia 5 Natural Medicines and Products Research Laboratory, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia 6 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology & Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] 7 School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +6-038-9769-1099 Received: 21 August 2020; Accepted: 11 September 2020; Published: 26 October 2020 Abstract: Honey is characterized as a natural and raw foodstuff that can be consumed not only as a sweetener but also as medicine due to its therapeutic impact on human health. It is prone to adulterants caused by humans that manipulate the quality of honey. Although honey consumption has remarkably increased in the last few years all around the world, the safety of honey is not assessed and monitored regularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Experience 135 Your Choice
    SMOOTHIE BOWL (FRESH FRUIT SMOOTHIE BASE WITH DIFFERENT TOPPINGS) ROASTED PINEAPPLE WITH BANANA 45 CASHEW NUTS, CHOCOLATE RICE CRISPS, HONEY STRAWBERRY WITH BANANA 45 COCONUT SHAVINGS, DRIED APRICOT GRANOLA, BLUEBERRY, CARAMELIZED APPLE TRADITIONAL EXPERIENCE 135 RASPBERRY WITH BANANA 45 (TO BE SHARED) STAR FRUIT, SOUR CHERRY PUFFED RICE, RAISINS, WALNUTS TURKISH BREAD BASKET (SİMİT, SOURDOUGH, VILLAGE BREADS) BRUNCH OR AVOCADO ON TOAST, POACHED EGG 40 CONTINENTAL BASKET (CROISSANT, PAIN AU THYME HONEY, ROCKET CHOCOLAT, BAKERY SPECIALTIES) SCRAMBLED EGGS ON SOURDOUGH TOAST 85 SUMMER BLACK TRUFFLE OLIVES, CUCUMBER, TOMATO, GREEN PEPPERS, PARSLEY TIGER SHRIMP, EGG, CONFIT RED 80 BELL PEPPERS, FLAX SEED FOCACCIA CROUTON TURKISH CHEESE SELECTION AND CONDIMENTS LOBSTER OMELET, BURRATA CHEESE 105 ISOT PEPPER KAYMAK, HONEY COMB, PINE HONEY, BUTTER FRENCH TOAST, COCONUT, RASPBERRIES 50 CARDAMOM SEASONAL JAMS AND PRESERVES CHIA PANCAKES, BANANA 50 TOASTED OATS, BLUEBERRIES FRUIT PLATE RICE NOODLES, CARROTS 105 ZUCCHINI AND PRAWN SALAD CASHEWS, THAI DRESSING FRIED SUCUK QUINOA SALAD, VANILLA CONFIT PUMPKIN 80 RASPBERRY DRESSING, TOASTED SEEDS MENEMEN ROASTED TURKEY CROQUE MADAME 45 SWEET POTATO CREAM, SLOW POACHED 95 YOUR CHOICE OF MAIN CHICKEN, CORIANDER, MINT, BEAN SPROUTS (INCLUDED IN YOUR EXPERIENCE) QUINOA CHEESE BURGER, LETTUCE 105 SEMI-DRIED TOMATOES, ONIONS LIGHT HOUSE DRESSING EGGS YOUR WAY SLOW BRAISED BEEF, SCRAMBLED EGGS, CRISPY FRESHLY PRESSED PHYLLO AND SQUEEZED JUICE EGGS BENEDICT, MUFFIN, AVOCADO, LIME ORANGE, GRAPEFRUIT, WATERMELON
    [Show full text]
  • Some Forest Trees for Honeydew Honey Production in Turkey
    СИБИРСКИЙ ЛЕСНОЙ ЖУРНАЛ. 2017. № 4. С. 101–110 UDC 638.165.81:595.75:582.475.4 SOME FOREST TREES FOR HONEYDEW HONEY PRODUCTION IN TURKEY S. Ünal, S. Ayan, M. Karadeniz, E. N. Yer Kastamonu University Kuzeykent mh. Org. Atilla Ateş Paşa cd., Kastamonu, 37100 Turkey E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 25.01.2016 Honey is an important source of nutrients and energy and an effective remedy against various human diseases. Honeydew honey is produced from honeydew of phloem-feeders that honeybees gather. In this study, we focused on honeydew producers and diversity of host tree species which are involved in honeydew production in Turkey. A total of 24 honeydew producers by host tree species are identified in Turkey. Of these, 13 coniferous trees and 11 deciduous trees. The main honeydew producer in Turkey is a scale insect, Marchalina hellenica Gennadius (Hemiptera: Margarodidae) living mainly on pines (Turkish red pine, Aleppo pine, and rarely on stone pine, Anatolian black pine and Scots pine). Honeydew producer insects can be treated as serious pests of conifer and broadleaf trees. The aphids and the scale insects such as Ceroplastes floridensis, Cinara cedri, C. laportei, Eulachnus rileyi, Icerya purchase, Kermes vermilio, Lichtensia viburni and Saissetia oleae are known as pests in several European, Asian and African countries. Despite their potential harm to their host plants, insect species producing honeydew play an important role in honey production in Turkey. Turkish honey production is exported to EU countries and, furthermore beekeeping is an important part of agricultural sector in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Report of Selected Non-Wood Forest Product Pine Honey
    DETAILED REPORT OF SELECTED NON-WOOD FOREST PRODUCT PINE HONEY 31 August 2020, Edited Draft 1 CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. 4 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................. 6 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................ 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 9 1. CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 10 1.1. Beekeping and Honey Production in Turkey ............................................................ 10 1.2. Pine Honey ................................................................................................................ 11 1.3. The giant pine scale-Marchaline hellenica ............................................................... 11 1.4. Muğla Province for Pine Honey Production .............................................................. 16 1.5. Official Statistics in Turkey ....................................................................................... 17 2. CHAPTER II ECONOMİCAL VALUE AND USAGES ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Treasures of the Russian Taiga — from the Siberian Tiger
    SIBERIAN TIGER THE TREASURES OF THE RUSSIAN TAIGA — FROM THE SIBERIAN TIGER Russian forests offer a bounty of natural food and medicinal products. Both local villagers and wild animals depend on the mushrooms, berries, nuts, honey and medical plants that grow there. This booklet describes how wise use of non- timber forest resources helps to protect the ‘home’ of the Siberian tiger and to promote sustainable forest management in Russia. As a part of International Climate Initiative, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) and KfW Development Bank sponsor collaborative projects by WWF Russia and WWF Germany that are implemented in the Russian Far East for the protection of Korean pine forests and Siberian tiger habitat. © Gennadiy Pavlishin illustrator The Siberian tiger is a rare Despite its might, this powerful animal endangered predator. It is the largest is very vulnerable. One of the greatest of five existing tiger subspecies and threats to its survival is the degradation the only one that lives in snow. of coniferous-broadleaved forests, the ‘home’ of the tiger. These forests play an essential role in preserving the unique biodiversity The 2005 inventory have of the Sikhote-Alin Mountains and shown that there are supporting its climatic and water about 450 Siberian tigers regimes. Unfortunately, they are often left in the wild in the subjected to degradative, unsustainable Russian Far East. logging practices. The most valuable areas of coniferous- broadleaved forests have been given a status of ‘nut harvesting zones’. Such zones preserve the treasures of the Korean pine forests and are used for harvesting edible and medical plants and hunting fur-bearing animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semi-Weekly News September 21, 1915
    Winthrop University Digital Commons @ Winthrop University Chester News 1915 The heC ster News 9-21-1915 The eS mi-Weekly News September 21, 1915 W. W. Pegram Stewart L. Cassels J. H. Williamson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/chesternews1915 Part of the Journalism Studies Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Pegram, W. W.; Cassels, Stewart L.; and Williamson, J. H., "The eS mi-Weekly News September 21, 1915" (1915). Chester News 1915. 24. https://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/chesternews1915/24 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The heC ster News at Digital Commons @ Winthrop University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chester News 1915 by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Winthrop University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNABLE TO AGREE [ HERE AND THERE DEMAND FOR PAPER MONEY COTTON SEED HULLS FAIR ASSOCIATION SENATOR LEW- MEETING AIR PERIL, ABOUT MUNITIONS: I THE WAR CLIMBING IN PRICE ELECTS OFFICERS IS PROTESTED SAYS MR. BALFOOK .Wlsti Credit to Be Used Only f^r Washington. Sept. 17.—Improved business conditions are Indicated by Foodstuffs, Cotton and Manu- South Georgia Quarantine and North At a recent meeting of tbe Ches- British Go'^ernmcr.t Places O tiers the demand for paper mo ey, ac- factures. Georgia Demand Has Forced ter County Kalr Association !he fol- In Canada—Americans Insure A- cording to treasury officials. Up Price «t Carolina M l*. lowing offlcera were eiscted to New York, Sept. 17 —The Anglo- galnst Zeppelin Raid*. To meet the demand for United WasMngllo, 8»j!t.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Honey Adulteration and Detection of Adulterants in Honey
    International Journal of Gastroenterology 2019; 4(1): 1-6 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijg doi: 10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.11 ISSN: 2640-1681 (Print); ISSN: 2640-169X (Online) Review Article Review on Honey Adulteration and Detection of Adulterants in Honey Alemu Girma Tura 1, Dechasa Bersissa Seboka 2 1Department of Food Process Engineering, Welkite University, Welkite, Ethiopia 2Department of Food Science and Postharvest Technology, Haramaya Institute of Technology, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia Email address: To cite this article: Alemu Girma Tura, Dechasa Bersissa Seboka. Review on Honey Adulteration and Detection of Adulterants in Honey. International Journal of Gastroenterology . Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.11 Received : November 7, 2019; Accepted : December 30, 2019; Published : January 8, 2020 Abstract: Honey is defined as the natural sweet substance produced by honeybees. Honey consist mainly sugars but also contains some amounts of acids, phenolic contents, HMF (Hydroxyl Methyl Furfural), minerals and water. Honey adulteration is a global concern and developing countries are at higher risk associated with it due to lack of detection methods, awareness of people and policies. Honey adulteration occurs by direct addition of sucrose syrups that are produced from sugar beet, high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), maltose syrup or by adding industrial sugar (glucose and fructose). Adulterants can be classified as intentional, unintentional, metallic and microbial based on type of adulterants in honey. Nowadays honey is being adulterated in more sophisticated ways that more difficult to detection of adulterants in simple methods. This paper presents a detailed review of common honey adulterants in honey as well as different methods to detect the adulterants both qualitatively and quantitatively.
    [Show full text]