Slip rate of the western Garlock fault, at Clark Wash, near Lone Tree Canyon, Mojave Desert, California
Sally F. McGill1†, Stephen G. Wells2, Sarah K. Fortner3*, Heidi Anderson Kuzma1**, John D. McGill4
1Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, California 92407-2397, USA 2Desert Research Institute, PO Box 60220, Reno, Nevada 89506-0220, USA 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W Dayton St., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA 4Department of Physics, California State University, San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, California 92407-2397, USA *Now at School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, 275 Mendenhall Laboratory, 125 S. Oval Mall, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA **Now at Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 760 Davis Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720 - 1710, USA
- ABSTRACT
- than rates inferred from geodetic data. The ously published slip-rate estimates from a simi-
high rate of motion on the western Garlock lar time period along the central section of the
The precise tectonic role of the left-lateral fault is most consistent with a model in which fault (Clark and Lajoie, 1974; McGill and Sieh, Garlock fault in southern California has the western Garlock fault acts as a conju- 1993). This allows us to assess how the slip rate been controversial. Three proposed tectonic gate shear to the San Andreas fault. Other changes as a function of distance along strike. models yield significantly different predic- mechanisms, involving extension north of the Our results also fill an important temporal niche tions for the slip rate, history, orientation, Garlock fault and block rotation at the east- between slip rates estimated at geodetic time and total bedrock offset as a function of dis- ern end of the fault may be relevant to the scales (past decade or two) and fault motions tance along strike. In an effort to test these central and eastern sections of the fault, but inferred from longer term (>1 m.y.) offsets of models, we present the first slip-rate estimate they cannot explain a high rate of slip on the geologic features. for the western Garlock fault that is con- western Garlock fault.
- strained by radiocarbon dating. A channel
- Tectonic Models
(referred to here as Clark Wash) incised into INTRODUCTION a Latest Pleistocene alluvial fan has been left-
Hill and Dibblee (1953) viewed the left-lateral
laterally offset at least 66 6 m and no more
The tectonic role of the Garlock fault (Fig. 1) Garlock and Big Pine faults and the right-lateral than 100 m across the western Garlock fault, has been an intriguing question for several San Andreas fault as conjugate shears defining a indicating a left-lateral slip rate of 7.6 mm/ decades. Three primary models have been pro- regional strain pattern of north-south compresyr (95% confidence interval of 5.3–10.7 mm/ posed. It has been interpreted (1) as a conjugate sion and east-west extension (Fig. 2A). In this yr) using dendrochronologically calibrated shear to the SanAndreas fault (Hill and Dibblee, view the Garlock and San Andreas faults both radiocarbon dates. The timing of aggrada- 1953) that helps to accommodate convergence accommodate eastward motion of the Mojave tional events on the Clark Wash fan corre- at the major restraining bend in the San Andreas block as it extrudes from the Transverse Ranges sponds closely to what has been documented fault in southern California (Stuart, 1991), (2) as restraining bend formed between the Pacific and elsewhere in the Mojave Desert, suggesting a transform fault accommodating extension in North American plates along the San Andreas that much of this activity has been climati- the Basin and Range (Davis and Burchfiel, fault in southern California. Consistent with this
callycontrolled.Therange-frontfault,located 1973), and (3) as a structure accommodat- model, left-lateral faulting of Quaternary age in
a few hundred meters northwest of the Gar- ing block rotation in the northeastern Mojave California is largely confined to the vicinity of lock fault, has probably acted primarily as a (Humphreys and Weldon, 1994; Guest et al., this regional-scale restraining bend in the San normal fault, with a Holocene rate of dip-slip 2003). In contrast to all three geologic models, Andreas fault (Figs. 1 and 2A). Similar lateral
of 0.4–0.7 mm/yr. The record of prehistoric geodetic data suggest that the region surround- extrusion models have been proposed for strike-
earthquakes on the Garlock fault at this site, ing the Garlock fault is dominated by northwest- slip faults in other parts of the world (McKenthough quite possibly incomplete, suggests a oriented, right-lateral shear and that very little zie, 1972; Tapponnier et al., 1982), as well as for longer interseismic interval (1200–2700 yr) left-lateral strain is accumulating on the Garlock the Los Angeles basin and western Transverse for the western Garlock fault than for the fault (Savage et al., 1981, 1990, 2001; Gan et al., Ranges (Walls et al., 1998), although Argus et
central Garlock fault. The relatively high slip rate determined Peltzer et al., 2001).
here indicates that the western and central In an effort to test proposed models and to of convergence in the Los Angeles basin and segments of the Garlock fault show similar better understand the tectonic role of the Gar- western Transverse Ranges (Fig. 2A). rates of movement that are somewhat faster lock fault, we have measured the latest Pleisto- Other investigators proposed
2000; McClusky et al., 2001; Miller et al., 2001; al. (1999) argue that crustal thickening, rather than westward extrusion, is the dominant mode
- a
- second
cene to Holocene slip rate on the western strand model in which the Garlock fault is a transform of the Garlock fault, for comparison with previ- fault (Fig. 2B), with left slip on the Garlock
†E-mail: [email protected] GSA Bulletin; March/April 2009; v. 121; no. 3/4; p. 536–554; doi: 10.1130/B26123.1; 14 figures; 1 table; Data Repository item 2008251.
For permission to copy, contact [email protected]
536
© 2009 Geological Society of America
Downloaded from https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/121/3-4/536/3400247/i0016-7606-121-3-536.pdf by California Inst of Technology user
Slip rate of the western Garlock fault
Holocene faults
California
GF
37°N
Quaternary faults
slip-rate and paleoseismic sites
BASIN AND RANGE
SAF
Saline Valley
Area of fig. 1
Sierra Nevada
36°N
- SV
- SR
SSH
- AM
- El Paso Peaks
EPM
Searles Lake shoreline
Christmas Canyon
SM
Mesquite Canyon
Bakersfield
Koehn Lake
SLB
Clark Wash
Oak Creek
Twin Lakes
35°N
Mojave
PM
Barstow
MOJAVE DESERT
Los Angeles
34°N
- 100
- 50
- 0
- 100 km
- 118°W
- 117°W
- 120°W
- 119°W
- 116°W
Figure 1. Location of the Clark Wash site (large white circle) as well as other slip-rate and paleoseismic sites (small white circles) along the Garlock fault. AM—Avawatz Mountains; EPM—El Paso Mountains; GF—Garlock fault; PM—Providence Mountains; SAF—San Andreas fault; SLB—Soda Lake Basin; SM—Soda Mountains; SR—Slate Range; SSH—Salt Spring Hills; SV—Searles Valley.
- fault accommodating differential extension in perpendicular to the northeast- to east-striking
- The Cenozoic extension direction in the
the Basin and Range province (between the Garlock fault (Fig. 2B). Modern deformation Basin and Range province is west-northwestSierra Nevada and Death Valley) relative to in the portion of the Basin and Range province ward (Stewart, 1983; Burchfiel et al., 1987; the Mojave block (Hamilton and Myers, 1966; north of the Garlock fault is largely northwest- Jones, 1987; Wernicke et al., 1988; Snow and Troxel et al., 1972; Davis and Burchfiel, 1973). oriented dextral shear (Fig. 2D). Late Qua- Wernicke, 2000). This orientation more closely The location of the Garlock fault at the south- ternary extension north of the Garlock fault approaches the strike of the central and eastern margin of the western Basin and Range appears to be largely concentrated within pull- ern Garlock fault but is still at a 45° angle to province is consistent with the transform apart basins (Death Valley, Panamint Valley, the western Garlock fault. The transform fault model, as is the eastward termination of the and Saline Valley) between northwest-strik- model may thus be a partially viable model for Garlock fault at the eastern limit of significant ing, right-lateral faults. It is these right-lateral the initiation of left slip on the central and eastQuaternary extension in the western Basin and faults, rather than the Garlock fault, that are ern Garlock fault (if that portion of the fault has Range province (Figs. 1 and 2B). The present- parallel to the present-day extension direction not been rotated—see third model below and day extension direction in the Basin and Range and appear to be serving as transform faults discussion section), but it is unable to explain province, however, is northwestward (Minster for the Late Quaternary extension north of the the orientation of the western Garlock fault, nor
- and Jordan, 1987; Dixon et al., 2000), nearly Garlock fault (Fig. 2B).
- does present-day extension seem capable of
- Geological Society of America Bulletin, March/April 2009
- 537
Downloaded from https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/121/3-4/536/3400247/i0016-7606-121-3-536.pdf by California Inst of Technology user
McGill et al.
- 538
- Geological Society of America Bulletin, March/April 2009
Downloaded from https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/121/3-4/536/3400247/i0016-7606-121-3-536.pdf by California Inst of Technology user
Slip rate of the western Garlock fault
Figure 2. Proposed tectonic models for the Garlock fault. (A) Conjugate faulting (Hill and Dibblee, 1953). Convergence at the large restrain- ing bend in the San Andreas fault is accommodated by a combination of eastward extrusion of the Mojave Desert and westward extrusion (Walls et al., 1998) and crustal thickening (indicated by large “+” symbol) (Argus et al., 1999) of the Transverse Ranges. LA—Los Angeles; WTR—western Transverse Ranges province. (B) Transform fault model (Davis and Burchfiel, 1973). DV—Death Valley; PV—Panamint Valley; SV—Saline Valley. (C) Model in which the eastern Garlock fault accommodates clockwise block rotation in the northeastern Mojave Desert (Guest et al., 2003). KL—Koehn Lake slip-rate site (Clark and Lajoie, 1974); RS—Rand schist; RS? —schist between stands of Garlock fault zone that may correlate with Rand schist; SSH—Salt Spring Hills; SR—Slate Range. (D) Geodetic velocity vectors from the Southern California Earthquake Center’s Crustal Motion Model, version 3 (CMM3) (http://epicenter.usc.edu/cmm3/) relative to a refer- ence frame defined by 12 stations on the North American plate. Vectors shown have been arbitrarily selected from the complete data set to reduce clutter. Dashed polygons show the locations of two transects plotted in Figure 13.
driving a significant amount of left slip on any has remained an important, throughgoing fault The rotating block model (Fig. 2C) primarily
- part of the Garlock fault (Figs. 2B and 2D).
- that has produced several large earthquakes in explains slip on the eastern Garlock fault and
Since the recognition of the Eastern Califor- the past few thousand years (McGill and Sieh, predicts little or no slip on the western Garlock nia Shear Zone (Dokka and Travis, 1990), with 1991; McGill, 1992; Dawson et al., 2003) and is fault (Humphreys and Weldon, 1994).
- throughgoing, northwest-oriented, right-lateral still seismically active (Astiz and Allen, 1983).
- Our results from the Clark Wash site indicate
shear both north and south of the Garlock fault Evidence for Holocene left-lateral slip is abun- that the Holocene slip rate of the western strand (e.g., Savage et al., 1990) (see Fig. 2D), it is dant and nearly continuous along the entire of the Garlock fault is at least as fast as previno longer easy to view the Garlock fault as an ~250-km length of the fault (Clark, 1970; Clark, ously published rates along the central section accommodation structure separating two prov- 1973; McGill and Sieh, 1991), whereas the right- of the fault. Neither the transform nor rotating inces with radically different tectonic regimes. lateral faults to the north and south die out (e.g., block models are capable of explaining the oriInstead, the Garlock fault appears as an enig- Oskin and Iriondo, 2004) or exhibit possible left- entation of and rate of slip on the western Garmatic anomaly within a single large province— lateral drag folding as in the case of the southern lock fault. Some combination of the above modthe Eastern California Shear Zone. Both north Death Valley and Panamint Valley faults, as they els seems necessary to understand the tectonic and south of the Garlock fault, the Eastern Cali- approach the Garlock fault (Fig. 1). fornia Shear Zone (Fig. 1) has accommodated In light of recent understanding of dextral role of the fault as a whole. tens of kilometers of northwest-oriented, right- shear and vertical-axis block rotation in the SITE DESCRIPTION lateral shear in the late Tertiary (Stewart, 1983; Eastern California Shear Zone (Luyendyk et
- Burchfiel et al., 1987; Dokka and Travis, 1990), al., 1985; Carter et al., 1987; Ross et al., 1989;
- The site discussed here is informally named
at rates of 5–10 mm/yr across the zone since the Dokka and Travis, 1990; Schermer et al., 1996), the Clark Wash site because the offset chanlate Pleistocene (Lee et al., 2001; Oswald and Humphreys and Weldon (1994) and Guest et al. nel used for the slip-rate measurement was Wesnousky, 2002; Oskin et al., 2006). Geodetic (2003) have suggested a third model for the Gar- first noted by Clark (1973). The intersection of data (Fig. 2D) indicate that the Garlock region lock fault in which clockwise rotation of blocks Clark Wash with the Garlock fault is located is currently dominated by northwest-trending, in the northeastern Mojave Desert contributes near the center of section 26, T. 31 S., R. 36 right-lateral strain rather than by northeast- left slip to the eastern part of the Garlock fault E. (N35.205°, W118.087°), ~3.5 km southwest trending, left-lateral strain (Savage et al., 1981, (Fig. 2C). Guest et al. (2003) have shown that a of Lone Tree Canyon (Fig. 3), and ~18 km 1990, 2001; Gan et al., 2000; Miller et al., 2001; combination of large magnitude (~35° or more), northeast of the town of Mojave. The site is Peltzer et al., 2001). Present-day, northwest-ori- domino-style, clockwise rotation of blocks (and located ~3 km west of the western end of the ented, right-lateral shear has been documented of their left-lateral bounding faults) both south 3.5-km-wide left step in the Garlock fault that at rates of 9–11 mm/yr north of the Garlock fault and north of the Garlock fault and a moderate separates the western section of the fault from (Dixon et al., 2000; Meade and Hager, 2005) and amount of extension north of the Garlock fault the central section (Fig. 1). Koehn Lake occu~7–15 mm/yr south of the Garlock fault (Sauber between the Slate Range and the Salt Spring pies the center of a large closed depression that
- et al., 1986, 1994; Meade and Hager, 2005).
- Hills (Fig. 2C) can accommodate the full, has formed within this 3.5-km-wide dilational
Despite the prominence of the Eastern Cali- 48–64 km of left slip on the Garlock fault with- stepover in the fault. Within the study area the fornia Shear Zone, the Garlock fault arcs north- out requiring a search for an elusive eastward dominant strand of the Garlock fault is the segeasterly to easterly through this zone (Fig. 1), extension of the Garlock fault (e.g., Plescia and ment that enters the Koehn Lake stepover from with undeniable left-lateral bedrock offsets Henyey, 1982) that was previously thought nec- the west. However, the central segment of the
- of 48–64 km (Smith, 1962; Smith and Ketner, essary (Davis and Burchfiel, 1973).
- fault, which enters the Koehn Lake stepover
1970; Davis and Burchfiel, 1973; Carr et al., These three different models for the tectonic from the east, may continue westward into the 1993; Monastero et al., 1997; Jachens and Cal- role of the Garlock fault each result in different study area as a buried fault along the southern zia, 1998) and a Holocene slip rate between 4 predictions for the slip rate of the fault as a func- range front of the Sierra Nevada (Smith, 1964). and 9 mm/yr (Clark and Lajoie, 1974; McGill tion of position along strike. The conjugate fault This fault strand is referred to as the rangeand Sieh, 1993). Dextral shear in the East- model (Fig. 2A) predicts a slip rate that would front fault in this paper.
- ern California Shear Zone may have rotated gradually decrease eastward, away from the San
- The Clark Wash site is located on an alluvial
the central and eastern sections of the Garlock Andreas fault. The transform model predicts an fan complex that drains southeastward from the fault from an original northeastward strike to incrementally westward-increasing slip rate, as southern Sierra Nevada (Figs. 3 and 4). Clark their current east-northeast and eastward strikes each normal fault north of the Garlock fault con- Canyon, the drainage from which most of the (Fig. 2C) (Jones, 1987), but the Garlock fault tributes additional left slip to the fault (Fig. 2B). alluvialdepositsdiscussedhereemanated, drains
- Geological Society of America Bulletin, March/April 2009
- 539