DOCSLIB.ORG

Onaqui Mountain Herd Management Area Fertility Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Onaqui Mountain Herd Management Area Fertility Control United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-W010-2014-0021-EA May 2015 Onaqui Mountain Herd Management Area Fertility Control Location: Townships 5 to 10 South, Range 5 to 9 West, various sections, Tooele County, Utah Applicant/Address: Not Applicable Salt Lake Field Office 2370 South Decker Lake Boulevard West Valley City, Utah 84119 Phone: (801) 977-4300 Fax: (801) 977-4397 May 2015 Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE & NEED ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan(s)......................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans ......................................... 3 1.6 Identification of Issues ........................................................................................ 4 1.7 Issues Considered but Eliminated from Further Analysis ................................... 4 1.8 Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................... 5 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Alternative A – Proposed Action ........................................................................ 5 2.2.1 Horse Identification ..................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Record Keeping ........................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Regulatory Authorization............................................................................. 8 2.3 Alternative B – No Action .................................................................................. 8 2.4 Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Further Analysis ........................ 8 2.4.1 Helicopter Capture, Treat and Release Wild Horses ................................... 8 2.4.2 Bait Trapping with Selective Removal ........................................................ 8 2.4.3 Change AML Numbers and Decrease Livestock Grazing ........................... 8 2.5 Summary ............................................................................................................. 9 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 9 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 9 3.2 General Setting .................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Wild Horses ......................................................................................................... 9 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................................................. 11 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 11 4.2 General Analysis Assumptions and Guidelines ................................................ 11 4.3 Direct and Indirect Impacts ............................................................................... 11 4.3.1 Alternative A – Proposed Action ............................................................... 11 4.3.1.1 Wild Horses ........................................................................................ 11 4.3.1.2 Protective Measures ............................................................................ 13 4.3.1.3 Residual Impacts................................................................................. 13 4.3.1.4 Monitoring and/or Compliance .......................................................... 14 4.3.2 Alternative B – No Action ......................................................................... 15 4.3.2.1 Wild Horses ........................................................................................ 15 4.3.2.2 Protective Measures ............................................................................ 15 4.3.2.3 Residual Impacts................................................................................. 15 4.3.2.4 Monitoring and/or Compliance .......................................................... 15 4.4 Cumulative Impacts Analysis............................................................................ 15 4.4.1 Wild Horses ............................................................................................... 15 5 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION .......................................................... 16 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 16 5.2 Persons, Groups, and Agencies Consulted ........................................................ 17 5.3 Preparers ............................................................................................................ 17 i May 2015 5.4 Public Participation ........................................................................................... 18 5.4.1 Modifications Based on Public Comment and Internal Review ................ 18 5.4.2 Response to Public Comment .................................................................... 20 5.5 Summary ........................................................................................................... 50 6 REFERENCES AND APPENDICES ...................................................................... 51 6.1 References Cited ............................................................................................... 51 6.2 Appendices ........................................................................................................ 54 Appendix A, Map............................................................................................................. 55 Appendix B, Interdisciplinary Team Checklist ............................................................... 56 Appendix C, Standard Operating and Post-Treatment Monitoring Procedures .............. 60 Appendix D, PZP Mixing Procedures ............................................................................. 64 Appendix E, Data Sheet ................................................................................................... 65 List of Tables Table 1 Monitoring data collected at HMA gathers. ......................................................... 9 Table 2 People, agencies and organizations consulted/coordinated. ............................... 17 Table 3 List of preparers. ................................................................................................. 17 Table 4 Response to comments........................................................................................ 21 ii May 2015 Onaqui Mountain Herd Management Area Fertility Control Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-W010-2014-0021-EA 1 PURPOSE & NEED 1.1 Introduction This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared to disclose and analyze the environmental consequences of the Onaqui Mountain Herd Management Area Fertility Control project as proposed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Salt Lake Field Office (SLFO). This EA is a site-specific analysis of potential impacts that could result with the implementation of a proposed action or alternatives to the proposed action. The EA assists the BLM in project planning and ensuring compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and in making a determination as to whether any “significant” impacts could result from the analyzed actions. “Significance” is defined by NEPA and is found in regulation 40 CFR 1508.27. An EA provides evidence for determining whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a statement of “Finding of No Significant Impact” (FONSI). If the decision maker determines that this project has “significant” impacts following the analysis in the EA, then an EIS would be prepared for the project. If not, a Decision Record (DR) may be signed for the EA approving the selected alternative, whether the proposed action or another alternative. A DR, including a FONSI statement, documents the reasons why implementation of the selected alternative would not result in “significant” environmental impacts (effects) beyond those already addressed in Pony Express Resource Management Plan (January 1990), as amended. 1.2 Background The SLFO proposes to treat mares within the Onaqui Herd Management Area (HMA) with the fertility control drug ZonaStat-H which is the liquid native Porcine Zona Pellucida (PZP). This drug is federally approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and registered under the number 86833–1. PZP is a naturally occurring pig protein which degrades quickly in the environment. If eaten, it is digested like any other protein and cannot pass through the food chain (Kirkpatrick et al. 2006). The analysis area is located in Townships 5 to 10 South, Ranges 5 to 9 West, various sections, Salt Lake Meridian, Tooele County, Utah (Map, Appendix A). 1 May 2015 Additional information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nature Mapping Day 5 Identifying Birds: Anatomy
    Nature Mapping Day 5 Identifying Birds: Anatomy Did you see any birds during your nature observation? In Washington State, we observe birds more than any other type of wild vertebrate (animals with a backbone). Think about it. Most people see or hear a wild bird on most days of their life. That can not be said of wild mammals, reptiles, or fish. Once you start noticing birds, most people want to be able to identify what birds they are observing. Often, one of the first things a person notices about a bird is their colors and patterns. Those are called field marks. When you are using field marks, it helps if you know a little bird anatomy. Ornithologists (people who study birds) talk about parts of a bird by dividing its body into regions. The main areas are beak (or bill), head, back, throat, breast, wings, tail, and legs. Many of these regions are divided still further. Purpose: At the end of this lesson I can say with confidence . 1) I can create and use a diagram of a bird’s feathers. Directions: 1) Click on the link below to go to TheCornellLab Bird Academy to learn All About Bird Anatomy. a) https://academy.allaboutbirds.org/features/birdanatomy/ i) Click the -GO!- button to enter the interactive learning tool. ii) Turn each system on or off by using the color-coded boxes. iii) Learn about the individual parts in a system by clicking on the box. The part will be highlighted on the bird diagram. iv) Click on the highlighted section of the bird diagram to learn the function or description of each part and how to pronounce its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Horses Are Scored Hooks and Pins Are Prominent
    SPECIAL REPORT BCS A USEFUL TOOL Don Henneke’s nine-point scale takes the guesswork out of evaluating equine body fat levels. he body condition score (BCS) Score: 1 (Poor) Score: 2 (Very thin) system offers an objective • Extreme emaciation. • Emaciated. method of estimating a horse’s • Spinous processes, ribs, tailhead, and • Thin layer of fat over base of spinous body fat levels. hooks and pins are prominent. processes. TDeveloped 25 years ago by Don • Bone structure of withers, shoulder and • Transverse processes of lumbar Henneke, PhD, as part of his doctoral neck is easily noticeable. vertebrae feel rounded. research, the BCS scale ranges from 1 • No fatty tissue can be felt. • Spinous processes, ribs, tailhead, and (poor) to 9 (obese). Horses are scored hooks and pins are prominent. based on visual and hands-on appraisal • Withers, shoulders and neck structures of six body areas where fat tends to are faintly discernable. accumulate in a predictable pattern (see diagram below). At right is an illustrated guide to the BCS system. Each score is accompa- nied by the notable physical attributes GETTING FAT: Horses develop body fat in described in Henneke’s original BCS a predictable pattern, starting behind the research. The key terms used include: shoulder, moving back over the ribs, up over • crease---a “gutter” over the spine the rump and finally along the back forward created by fat buildup on either side of to the neck and head. A horse’s BCS is the bone. based on an appraisal of fat accumulation • hooks---the pel- in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Dog the Present Volume of Anatomy of the Dog Is Based on the 8Th Edition of the Highly Successful German Text-Atlas of Canine Anatomy
    Klaus-Dieter Budras · Patrick H. McCarthy · Wolfgang Fricke · Renate Richter Anatomy of the Dog The present volume of Anatomy of the Dog is based on the 8th edition of the highly successful German text-atlas of canine anatomy. Anatomy of the Dog – Fully illustrated with color line diagrams, including unique three-dimensional cross-sectional anatomy, together with radiographs and ultrasound scans – Includes topographic and surface anatomy – Tabular appendices of relational and functional anatomy “A region with which I was very familiar from a surgical standpoint thus became more comprehensible. […] Showing the clinical rele- vance of anatomy in such a way is a powerful tool for stimulating students’ interest. […] In addition to putting anatomical structures into clinical perspective, the text provides a brief but effective guide to dissection.” vet vet The Veterinary Record “The present book-atlas offers the students clear illustrative mate- rial and at the same time an abbreviated textbook for anatomical study and for clinical coordinated study of applied anatomy. Therefore, it provides students with an excellent working know- ledge and understanding of the anatomy of the dog. Beyond this the illustrated text will help in reviewing and in the preparation for examinations. For the practising veterinarians, the book-atlas remains a current quick source of reference for anatomical infor- mation on the dog at the preclinical, diagnostic, clinical and surgical levels.” Acta Veterinaria Hungarica with Aaron Horowitz and Rolf Berg Budras (ed.) Budras ISBN 978-3-89993-018-4 9 783899 9301 84 Fifth, revised edition Klaus-Dieter Budras · Patrick H. McCarthy · Wolfgang Fricke · Renate Richter Anatomy of the Dog The present volume of Anatomy of the Dog is based on the 8th edition of the highly successful German text-atlas of canine anatomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the Nebraska Shortgrass Prairie
    Shortgrass Prairie Region Mammal Viewing Tips Mammals can be difficult to see due to their secretive nature. 1. Stay quiet and calm. 2. Be discreet — wear muted clothing and limit fragrances. 3. Look for signs — tracks and scat can tell you if a mammal is in the area, even when you don’t see them. 4. Use binoculars to get a closer look. The shortgrass prairie region includes Always keep a respectful distance Mammals the southwestern corner and Panhandle of from wildlife. Nebraska. This area is made up of short- to 5. Be patient. 6. Go to where the habitat is — visit state mixedgrass prairie and the Pine Ridge. The parks and other public lands. of the shortgrass prairie is the driest and warm- 7. Do your homework — learn what est of the Great Plains grasslands. species of mammals live in the area. This region receives an average of 12 - Nebraska 17 inches of rainfall annually and consists Tracks of buffalo grass and blue grama. The Pine American Badger Ridge is found in northwestern Nebraska Length: 2.5 - 3 in. Shortgrass Width: 2.3 - 2.8 in. and is dominated by ponderosa pine. More Stride: 6 - 12 in. than 300 species of migratory and resident Coyote Prairie birds can be found in the shortgrass prairie Length: 2 - 3.2 in. region, as well as a variety of mammals, Width: 1.4 - 2.4 in. Stride: 8 - 16 in. (walking) plants and other species. Mountain Lion Length: 3 - 4.25 in. Width: 3 - 5 in. Identification Stride: 25 - 45 in. Guide Bobcat Length: 1.8 - 2.5 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area
    Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area Jeremy Beaulieu Lisa Andreano Michael Walgren Introduction The following is a guide to the common birds of the Estero Bay Area. Brief descriptions are provided as well as active months and status listings. Photos are primarily courtesy of Greg Smith. Species are arranged by family according to the Sibley Guide to Birds (2000). Gaviidae Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: A small loon seldom seen far from salt water. In the non-breeding season they have a grey face and red throat. They have a long slender dark bill and white speckling on their dark back. Information: These birds are winter residents to the Central Coast. Wintering Red- throated Loons can gather in large numbers in Morro Bay if food is abundant. They are common on salt water of all depths but frequently forage in shallow bays and estuaries rather than far out at sea. Because their legs are located so far back, loons have difficulty walking on land and are rarely found far from water. Most loons must paddle furiously across the surface of the water before becoming airborne, but these small loons can practically spring directly into the air from land, a useful ability on its artic tundra breeding grounds. Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: The Pacific Loon has a shorter neck than the Red-throated Loon. The bill is very straight and the head is very smoothly rounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    i CONTENTS GUIDE TO CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................................................................... iii EDITORIAL ........................................................................................................................................... 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY NOTES ...................................................................................................................... 3 HISTORY OF THE AUROCHS (BOS TAURUS PRIMIGENIUS) IN POLAND Mieczyslaw Rokosz’ .............................................................................................................................. 5 GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF DUAL PURPOSE CATTLE IN LATIN AMERICA Lucía Vaccaro1 and Delia Lópezz........................................................................................................ 13 FOUR INTERESTING ENDANGERED BREEDS OF ANIMALS IN CHINA You-Chun Chen ................................................................................................................................... 29 LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN CROATIA R. T. Wilson .......................................................................................................................................... 37 RESSOURCES GENETIQUES ANIMALES DU CAMEROUN Messine O., Tanya V.N, Mbah D.A. et Tawah C.L. ................................................................................ 47 NATIVE CATTLE AND HORSE BREEDS IN ESTONIA R. Teinberg, K. Kalamees and A. Kallaste ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    59 SHEEP AND CATTLE IN YEMEN H.U. Hasnain1, A. A. A1 Nokhie2 and A.R.F. A1 Iryani3 1FAO Livestock Expert, UTF/PDY/013, Meifa, Shabwa, YEMEN. 2Research Assistant and 3Research Associate Agricultural Research and Extension Authority, Dhamar, YEMEN. SUMMARY The present Republic of Yemen (RDY) was formed in 1991 with the union of two Yemens namely, Yemen Arab Republic (YAR) or North Yemen and the Peoples Democratic Republic of Yemen (PDRY) or South Yemen. Studies on livestock breeds were undertaken in the former YAR during 1985-87 under the FAO Project UTFN/YEM/011. It was supplemented with a rapid survey for the former PDRY in 1991 by the senior author (HUH) under the FAO Project UTF/ PDY/013. The information on goats in Yemen has recently been published in FAO Animal Genetic Resources Information No: 8 ( 1992). Here is presented the information of the Yemeni sheep and cattle population. RESUME La République du Yemen actuelle (RDY) a été formée en 1991 par l’union des deux Yemen, la République du Yemen Arabe (YAR) ou Nord Yemen et la République Démocratique Populaire du Yemen (PDRY) ou Sud Yemen. L’étuzde des races de bétail a été entreprise dans l’ex Nord Yemen en 1985-87 dans le cadre du projet FAO UTFN/YEM/011, cornplétés par une enquête rapide au Sud Yemen dans le cadre du projet FAO UTF/PDY/013 en 1991. Les données concernant les chèvres ont été publiées dans un précédent numéro de AGRI ( No 8), Ce second article présente les informations recueillies en ce qui concerne le races de brebis et de vache.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Diamond Complex Wild Horse Gather Plan
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2012-0045-EA Final Diamond Complex Wild Horse Gather Plan Office, Nevada Office, Battle Mountain District District Mountain December 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Battle Mountain District Mount Lewis Field Office 50 Bastian Road, Battle Mountain NV 89820 Diamond Complex Wild Horse Gather Plan Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2012-0045-EA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Background 3 1.2. Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action 11 1.3. Land Use Plan Conformance 11 1.4. Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, Policy, Plans or Other Environmental Analysis 12 1.5. Conformance with Rangeland Health Standards and Guidelines 13 1.6. Decision to be Made 13 1.7. Scoping and Identification of Issues 14 2. Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives 15 2.1. Management Actions Common to the Proposed Action and Action Alternatives 17 2.2. Proposed Action and Alternatives 19 2.3. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis 23 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 29 3.1. General Description of the Affected Environment 30 3.2. Wild Horses 31 3.3. Livestock Management 59 3.4. Noxious Weeds, Invasive and Non-Native species 65 3.5. Vegetation/Drought 69 3.6. Riparian-Wetland Resources and Water Quality 77 3.7. Soils 86 3.8. Threatened & Endangered Species, Special Status Species, Migratory Birds and Wildlife 90 3.9 Health and Safety 95 3.10. Wild Horse Gather Mitigation Measures 96 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Wildlife Identification Guide
    TEXAS WILDLIFE IDENTIFICATION GUIDE A guide to game animals, game birds, furbearers and other wildlife of Texas. INTRODUCTION Texas game animals, game birds, furbearers and other wildlife are important for many reasons. They provide countless hours of viewing and recreational opportunities. They benefit the Texas economy through hunting and “nature tourism” such as birdwatching. Commercial businesses that provide birdseed, dry corn and native landscaping may be devoted solely to attracting many of the animals found in this book. Local hunting and trapping economies, guiding operations and hunting leases have prospered because of the abun- dance of these animals in Texas. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department benefits because of hunting license sales, but it uses these funds to research, manage and protect all wildlife populations – not just game animals. Game animals provide humans with cultural, social, aesthetic and spiritual pleasures found in wildlife art, taxidermy and historical artifacts. Conservation organiza- tions dedicated to individual species such as quail, turkey and deer, have funded thousands of wildlife projects throughout North America, demonstrating the mystique game animals have on people. Animals referenced in this pocket guide exist because their habitat exists in Texas. Habitat is food, cover, water and space, all suitably arranged. They are part of a vast food chain or web that includes thousands more species of wildlife such as the insects, non-game animals, fish and i rare/endangered species. Active management of wild landscapes is the primary means to continue having abundant populations of wildlife in Texas. Preservation of rare and endangered habitat is one way of saving some species of wildlife such as the migratory whooping crane that makes Texas its home in the winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing and Contrasting Knowledge on Mules and Hinnies As a Tool to Comprehend Their Behavior and Improve Their Welfare
    animals Review Comparing and Contrasting Knowledge on Mules and Hinnies as a Tool to Comprehend Their Behavior and Improve Their Welfare Amy McLean 1,*, Angela Varnum 2, Ahmed Ali 3,4, Camie Heleski 5 and Francisco Javier Navas González 6 1 Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA 2 College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 3 Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 4 Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA 5 Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA 6 Department of Genetics, Veterinary Sciences, University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-706-296-8743 Received: 29 May 2019; Accepted: 20 July 2019; Published: 26 July 2019 Simple Summary: Mules and hinnies combine traits of their equid parents—the horse and donkey—but are less studied or understood. Still, their welfare varies greatly because of several factors. These hybrids have anatomy, health, nutritional, and behavioral particularities that are distinct from those of donkeys or horses. Their behavior can pose challenges to providing routine care and treatment during times of disease. Abusive treatment can result from those who have little understanding of learning theory or body language. Hence, an overview of studies and field observations can offer solutions for welfare enhancement. According to literature, participatory surveys and behavioral assessments across several countries, mule owners and handlers find it easier to interact with their animal as compared to allowing a stranger to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Head and Neck, 2
    Horse Science: Functional Anatomy and Action Page 3 Since both conformation and action need to be included Coarseness about the head indicates a coarse body, lacking in light horse evaluation, the basic conformation features quality. The ear should be medium size, attractively set and tending to affect action must be understood. The relationship carried at a 45 degree angle to the axis of the head. Large, of body parts to performance (form to function) will be here full, prominent eyes of a clear deep color are desired. Small discussed with the body of the horse divided into four areas: blue eyes are considered weak. Small narrow, squinty eyes 1. Head and Neck, 2. Fore Quarters, 3. Body or Trunk, 4. are often correlated with coarseness in quality and a lazy, Rear Quarters. sluggish, disposition. Large nostrils allow for a maximum air intake and are HEAD AND NECK of prime importance because the horse cannot force air into the lungs through the mouth as is possible in other species of The ideal head for each breed is described by the animals. All breathing of air by the horse must be done association publications. The descriptions all say the head through the nostrils. should be broad in the forehead and between the eyes, short All horses, both long and short necked ones, have seven from the eyes to the nostrils and deep in the jaws. These cervical vertebrae. The shape of the neck is due largely to words mean only that the head should be in proportion to the the amount and shape of the muscular tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Equine - Breeds I a S S Council Service
    INDIANA INDIANA AGRICULTURAL HORSE STATISTICS INDIANA EQUINE - BREEDS I A S S COUNCIL SERVICE DONKEY OR MULE INDIANA, JANUARY 1, 2002 Donkeys and mules, (The American Donkey and Mule Society - Donkey or Mule http://www.lovelongears.com/), differ somewhat from horses January 1, 2002 in conformation. A Donkey is a different species than the horse, but the mule is a cross between the horse and a donkey. The Inventory 4,000 most noticeable difference is of course the ears. Donkey and Percent of Total Equine 2% mule ears are much longer in proportion to their size than a Total Value $3,760,000 horse. The necks are characteristically straighter in the Average Value Per Head $940 longears, and most donkeys and mules lack a prominent Median Value Per Head $700 wither. The croup and rump are also a different shape in the Number of Operations 1,690 donkey and it's hybrids, lacking the double-curve muscled Percent of Operations 5% haunch. The back is straighter due to the lack of withers. The Primary Use: Number Percent mane and tail in the donkey are coarse. Donkey and mule Brood Mares 750 19% hooves are smaller and rounder, with more upright pasterns. The vocal qualities are the frequently remembered differences * Stallions 150 4% in the long-ears. Racing 0 --- Show/Competition 220 5% Colors in the donkey and mule range from the gray shades of Trail/Recreation 1,790 45% Slate Gray (Gray-dun) to brown, a rare bay, black, light-faced Work 270 7% roan (both red and gray), variants of sorrel, the blue-eyed Ivory, * Other Use 820 20% Frosted/spotted White, and a unique Spotted pattern.
    [Show full text]