Global Marshall Plan Along Lines That You Have Developed on Your Website - Alprogressives.Org

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Marshall Plan Along Lines That You Have Developed on Your Website - Alprogressives.Org Network of Spiritual Progressives (NSP) THEGLOBAL MARSHALLPLAN MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR ON THE WEAKNESS OF VIOLENCE: The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy.... ...Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Dear Network of Spiritual Progressives: I’m proud to be working with you to build a cam - paign for a Global Marshall Plan along lines that you have developed on your website www.spiritu - alprogressives.org. Rabbi Michael Lerner and I have great respect for each other, and frankly I’m happy that this initiative comes from cooperation between me, the first Muslim elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, and a rabbi well known for his commitment to peace, social justice and ecological sanity for our planet. I have introduced into the House of Representa - tives House Resolution 1078 endorsing the Global Marshall Plan. I’m also glad to have been joined in this effort by those Members of Congress who have signed on as co-sponsors in the House (see sidebar). With your help, many other members of the House and Senate may join as co-sponsors as well. Sixty-three years ago, the United States emerged from world war determined to rebuild a devastated continent and to sow the seeds of lasting peace and prosperity, even for people whose governments had been our enemies. The Marshall Plan was a great success: it helped Europe recover and dramatically increased the goodwill of the world toward the United States, generating in - creased U.S. influence for two generations. The Marshall Plan demonstrated the transcendent power of America’s political and financial generosity. Today we face challenges at home and abroad that rival the scale of that time, and I believe the circumstances call us now to meet moral obligations beyond what our current system of public diplomacy and foreign aid are designed to handle. Foreign aid to poor countries in Africa, Asia and South/Central America, whether considered as a proportion of the Federal budget or as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP), has never reached close to the amount of money that we used in the first years of the Marshall Plan. Meanwhile, more than 1 billion people on our planet struggle to survive on less than $1 per day, and another 1.6 billion people on less than $2 per day. House Resolution 1078 recognizes that lasting security for America will be best achieved through policies of generosity and caring toward the rest of the world. It points out that the way to achieve these goals is through a new Global Marshall Plan in which the U.S. dedicates 1%-2% of the GDP each year for the next 20 years toward once and for all eliminating domestic and global poverty, homelessness, hunger, inadequate education, inadequate health care, and repairing the environment of the planet. The resolution also calls for creating international non-governmental mech - anisms for receiving and distributing such funds in ways that ensure that the money is safeguarded from corruption and protected from manipulation to serve elite interests, but instead is distributed in ways that are respectful of na - tive cultures, are environmentally sensitive, and reach the people who need it. It calls for the revising of existing trade agreements in ways that would im - prove the lives of the poor of the world, providing training in environmental sustainability, family and parental support, emergency health techniques, and non-violent communication. The campaign for a Global Marshall Plan will require years of work to help change the dominant way people think about homeland security. That cam - paign is being led by Rabbi Michael Lerner and the Network of Spiritual Progressives (NSP). I hope you will join with him and the NSP in this badly needed effort, and I, for my part, will do what I can to bring this way of think - ing into the conversation in the U.S. Congress. Hon. Keith Ellison (D, MN) House of Representatives Washington, D.C. CO-SPONSORS OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 1078 Rep. Tammy Baldwin [D-WI] Rep. Carolyn C. Kilpatrick [D-MI] Rep. Emanuel Cleaver [D-MO] Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich [D-OH] Rep. John Conyers [D-MI] Rep. Barbara Lee [D-CA] Rep. Susan A. Davis [D-CA] Rep. Jim McDermott [D-WA] Rep. Chaka Fattah [D-PA] Rep. James P. Moran [D-VA] Rep. Barney Frank [D-MA] Rep. John W. Olver [D-MA] Rep. Raul M. Grijalva [D-AZ] Rep. Donald M. Payne [D-NJ} Rep. Maurice D. Hinchley [D-NY] Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky [D-IL] Rep. Michael M. Honda [D-CA] Rep. Fortney Pete Stark [D-CA] Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson [D-TX} Rep. Lynn C. Woolsey [D-CA] Congressman Ellison and the others who have endorsed House Res. 1078 (the NSP version of the Global Marshall Plan) have not seen and do not necessarily endorse the specific arguments and analyses put forward in this booklet, which go further than HR 1078 in explaining the intellectual and spiritual foundations of the NSP approach. Which works better, a global martial plan… Security Through Domination: The Current Paradigm Most people on this planet want to live in a loving and compassionate way. The problem is, we’ve been taught by our culture that to live that way would put us in danger of being taken advantage of by everyone else. The domi - nant assumption of our culture is that we live in a world filled with hurt - ful people who care only about themselves, people who are likely to take advantage of us unless we protect ourselves by getting power over them before they get power over us. For thousands of years much of the human race has been living with the notion that the only way to achieve personal and collective security is through domination of others. That notion is dra - matically reinforced by our daily experience in the competitive market - place and the world of work where we frequently experience ourselves as surrounded by people who seem to be only “looking out for number one.” Many people develop a cynical and fearful attitude about others that car - ries over, and often influences, our personal lives. Though the levels of fear in the West were dramatically escalated post 9/11, these dynamics have been growing steadily for hundreds of years, with pro - found psychological and spiritual consequences for our daily lives. People have increasingly withdrawn from loving contact and emotional openness to each other into cocoons of imagined safety. We assume social roles that keep us trapped in isolation and loneliness while yearning for real contact and yet denying to ourselves and others that yearning for genuine recog - nition and loving community for fear of being humiliated and rejected. Y E L The desire to transcend these crippling dynamics is omnipresent, and the K L A need for recognition and deep connection to each other and to a larger H C M O T framework of meaning and purpose for our lives beyond “making it” in terms of money or power or sexual conquest or fame is ever-present and ready to break through to a world of genuine connection to other people, to our own deepest feelings, and to joyous celebration of the universe. Yet simultaneously our fear of being humiliated by expressing these needs openly and then finding ourselves made vulnerable while others fail to re - spond often leads us to repress our own deepest desires or to deny them as “utopian.” In that state of mind we may respond to calls for community that only extend to the people of our own race, religion or nationality, while assuming that “the others” do not share our desires and would, if given the chance, frustrate our needs. Nurtured by the media, by nationalist or fundamentalist dominated edu - cation, and by politicians who constantly adopt that “us vs. them” rhetoric in order to show that they themselves are “responsible” and “realistic,” many Americans accept the notion that the world is fundamentally unsafe and that the goal of American policy should be to advance “American in - terests” by dominating the world, either militarily, or, through one-sided global economic arrangements and diplomacy. Democrats and Republicans differ on the relative balance between military and diplomatic power, but many in both parties share the mistaken assumption that the only way to achieve security for America is to build a world in which we get “our way.” And “our way” usually ends up being defined in terms of the well- being of the most powerful corporations and their allies. National security is frequently defined in terms of their interests, so we end up spending vastly more on the military than on social programs. Y E L K L A H C M … or a Global Marshall Plan? O T These next two decades are likely to be the last in which US economic and military power decisively shape the world. As China, India and other coun - tries become more powerful, they will likely draw upon the precedents we've set as a world power. If we could dedicate our next two decades to showing how a world power could transcend "Us" vs "Them" thinking, we could be proud of the American legacy. To do that, we have to stop talking about keeping America "number one" and stop ignoring the suffering of billions on this planet. We should show that world power can act in ways that seek the advantage of al people on the planet.
Recommended publications
  • Migration, Sustainability and a Marshall Plan with Africa
    Special Edition Migration, Sustainability and a Marshall Plan with Africa A Memorandum for the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Governments of the EU Member States Bert Beyers Joachim von Braun Estelle Herlyn Klaus Leisinger Graeme Maxton Franz Josef Radermacher Thomas Straubhaar Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker Coordination Franz Josef Radermacher and the project team of FAW/n employees and the University of Ulm Download The document "Migration, Sustainability and a Marshall Plan with Africa – A Memorandum for the Federal Gov- ernment", a short version, and the associated material are available as PDF files at http://www.faw-neu-ulm.de http://www.senat-deutschland.de/, http://www.senatsinstitut.de/, http://www.clubofrome.de/ and http://www.clubofrome.org/. Picture credits title page • Evening, Djemaa El Fna square, Marrakech, Morocco - © Pavliha http://www.istockphoto.com/de/foto/abend-djemaa-el-fna-platz-marrakesch-marokko-gm499468399- 42845306?st=_p_pavliha%20El%20Fna • Photovoltaic Micro-plants by Isofoton (Morocco) by Isofoton.es (Creative Commons) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isofoton_Marruecos.JPG • Panorama of Cairo. Taken from Cairo Citadel by kallerna (Creative Commons) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:View_over_Cairo_from_Citadel.jpg Table of Contents Editorial .................................................................................................... 3 Summary and orientation ............................................................................ 9 I. Mare Nostrum – The history
    [Show full text]
  • The Candidates
    The Candidates Family Background Bush Gore Career Highlights Bush Gore Personality and Character Bush Gore Political Communication Lab., Stanford University Family Background USA Today June 15, 2000; Page 1A Not in Their Fathers' Images Bush, Gore Apply Lessons Learned From Losses By SUSAN PAGE WASHINGTON -- George W. Bush and Al Gore share a reverence for their famous fathers, one a former president who led the Gulf War, the other a three-term Southern senator who fought for civil rights and against the Vietnam War. The presidential candidates share something else: a determination to avoid missteps that brought both fathers repudiation at the polls in their final elections. The younger Bush's insistence on relying on a trio of longtime and intensely loyal aides -- despite grumbling by GOP insiders that the group is too insular -- reflects his outrage at what he saw as disloyalty during President Bush's re-election campaign in 1992. He complained that high- powered staffers were putting their own agendas first, friends and associates say. Some of those close to the younger Gore trace his willingness to go on the attack to lessons he learned from the above-the-fray stance that his father took in 1970. Then-senator Albert Gore Sr., D-Tenn., refused to dignify what he saw as scurrilous attacks on his character with a response. The approach of Father's Day on Sunday underscores the historic nature of this campaign, as two sons of accomplished politicians face one Political Communication Lab., Stanford University another. Their contest reveals not only the candidates' personalities and priorities but also the influences of watching their famous fathers, both in victory and in defeat.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration's Return in the Age of Climate Crisis: Toward a Feminist
    Restoration’s Return in the Age of Climate Crisis: Toward a Feminist Environmental Justice Response A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Michelle Jenneman Garvey IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Jacquelyn Zita November, 2014 © Michelle Jenneman Garvey 2014 Acknowledgements I have kept Donna Haraway’s discussion in How Like a Leaf (2000) on the relationship Martin Heidegger found between gratitude (thancian, “to thank,”) and thought (thencan, “to think”) close to my heart while writing this dissertation. In his publication entitled What is Called Thinking? (1954), Heidegger asks, “How can we give thanks to this endowment, the gift of being able to think what is most thought-provoking, more fittingly than by giving thought to the most thought-provoking? The supreme thanks…would be thinking. And the profoundest thanklessness, thoughtlessness” (Haraway & Goodeve, 22). Like Haraway and Heidegger, I agree that thinking “has to do with…a kind of remembering that is ‘in memory of’ those from whom one develops ones thinking” (Haraway & Goodeve, 22). In light of this acknowledgement, my dissertation is written especially “in memory of” my faithful readers, Susan Craddock, Dan Philippon, and David Pellow, each of whom inspired and supported me before this project, throughout this project, and beyond; my advisor, Jacquelyn Zita, who, over a decade-long relationship, between farm fields and classrooms and coffee shops, emboldened my belief in the importance of a unified feminism and environmentalism; and my defense chair, Naomi Scheman, who has perhaps given me the most to think/thank about in this project by encouraging creative, compassionate, and commonable connection-making.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Role in Saving the Global Environment
    THE U.S. ROLE IN SAVING THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT As THE WORLD 'S LEADI NG EXEMPLAR OF further thought. Since it has been dis­ crease in the amount of interest companies free market economics, the United States counted into insignificance, they figure we show in improving the efficiency of their has a special obligation to discover effec­ can just forget about it. And meanwhile we processes in order to reduce the pollution tive ways of using the power of market go on preaching to the rest of the world they cause. forces to help save the global environment. that our brand of market economics takes To most of us, the principle sounds Yet even as we correctly unassailable: let the polluter point out the dismal failures pay. But what about when it of communism, and even as applies to each of us instead we push the underdeveloped of to a nameless, faceless, world- appropriately, in my corporation? For example, view- to adopt a market­ rather than require homeown­ based approach to econom­ ers to pay higher property ics, we have been reluctant to taxes to cover the cost of admit our failure to bring en­ garbage collection, why not vironmental values into our lower property taxes and then economic decisions. Further, charge for garbage collecti on the Bush administration has directly- by the pound '7 shown little interest in chang­ Those responsible for creat­ ing the government policies ing more garbage would pay that presently distort the ptin­ more; those who found ways ciples of market economics to cut down woul d pay less.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Sustainable Development and Global Governance
    3 Pavel Nováček Third Transition Towards Sustainable Development and Global Governance Olomouc 2001 4 Contents Introduction … 4 Sustainable Development … 7 The Development of Man … 7 Natural Factors Influencing the Biosphere … 9 The Roots of the Global Crisis … 10 The State of the World … 13 The Biosphere and the Environment of Man … 24 The Third Global Revolution … 26 Towards Sustainable Development … 32 Human Values … 33 Economic System … 36 Political System … 42 Legal System … 47 Key Sectors … 48 Back to Natural Cycles (Recycling) … 59 The Implementation of Sustainable Development … 60 Global Governance … 64 Global Governance – Precondition for Sustainable Development … 64 United Nations Reform … 66 Global Civic Values … 79 Global Civil Society … 75 Global Economic Governance … 79 Global Security … 88 The Care for the Global Commons … 97 Development Assistance and Co-operation … 99 Global Marshall Plan … 105 Conclusion … 112 Appendix … 116 Partnership for Sustainable Development – The Millennium Project … 116 Lookout Study – Questionnaires Partnership for Sustainable Development – Evaluation … 124 Bibliography … 128 5 Present-day futurologists are endangered by the pitfalls of laxity, alibism and self-satisfaction, which manifest themselves by describing the future rather than thinking about it. It is conditioned to a high degree by the demands of economists. Such an attitude is more futurography than futurology. Futurologists, the people dealing with the future, behave in a short-sighted way until they understand futurology more as a futurosophy, i.e. as a pondering on the future. However, to deal with it, it is necessary to have courage and a strong motivation, which is not possible without a firm hope. It is necessary to add to the present futurography a futurosophy with a prophetic aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Justice and Ecological Responsibility: a Moral Case for International Collaborative Action on Environmental Degradation and Climate-Induced Displacement
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2015 Social Justice and Ecological Responsibility: A Moral Case for International Collaborative Action on Environmental Degradation and Climate-Induced Displacement James Stephen Mastaler Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Mastaler, James Stephen, "Social Justice and Ecological Responsibility: A Moral Case for International Collaborative Action on Environmental Degradation and Climate-Induced Displacement" (2015). Dissertations. 1646. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1646 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2015 James Stephen Mastaler LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO SOCIAL JUSTICE AND ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIBILITY: A MORAL CASE FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE ACTION ON ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION AND CLIMATE-INDUCED DISPLACEMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN THEOLOGY BY JAMES STEPHEN MASTALER CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 2015 Copyright by James Stephen Mastaler, 2015 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Certainly, this project would not have been possible without the support and direction of my committee chair, Dr. William French. I am thankful to him for so graciously teaching me how to focus my ideas and arguments and for patiently walking me through several revisions of early drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalcommons@Macalester College
    Macalester International Volume 6 Nature, People, and Globalization Article 23 Spring 5-31-1998 Response to Memon Daniel J. Hornbach Macalester College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl Recommended Citation Hornbach, Daniel J. (1998) "Response to Memon," Macalester International: Vol. 6, Article 23. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macintl/vol6/iss1/23 This Response is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for Global Citizenship at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Macalester International by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Response Daniel J. Hornbach Dr. Memon’s paper1 is an attempt to examine the factors that have led to environmental degradation, in general; specifically, he describes some attempts made in New Zealand to find solutions to managing these environmental problems. Since I’m not a specialist on New Zealand, I will discuss some of the more general environmental issues touched on in Dr. Memon’s paper.2 Dr. Memon’s comments indicate that he takes an antipodean posi- tion, i.e., the “other side of the world” perspective.3 I take this as a pos- itive contribution to examining the issues of environmental management, for it is through the sharing of many perspectives that we often develop solutions. Unfortunately, many environmentalists, politicians, economists, and industrialists similarly define environ- mental issues as a series of opposing dichotomies, many of which have been expressed at this Roundtable.4 Some dichotomies are: Capitalism vs. the Environment European Colonialism vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving a Domestic Consensus on Global Climate Change in the United States: Sine Qua Non to an Effective Global Response?
    Achieving a Domestic Consensus on Global Climate Change in the United States: Sine Qua Non to an Effective Global Response? A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy by Daniel Alan Reifsnyder In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. William R. Moomaw, Chair Dr. Andrew C. Hess Dr. William C. Martel Daniel A. Reifsnyder 2505 Valley Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-2800 703-519-0815 [email protected] Professional Experience DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, D.C. Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment (2006-present) (Senior Executive Service since 1994) Manage three offices (65 staff) on global climate change, environmental protection (air, ozone layer, chemicals), and conservation/water (forests, biodiversity, coral reefs) -- key achievements: Leading global efforts under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change o Chaired Ad Hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action (AWG/LCA), delivering major decision on 20 issues (adopted by 195 Parties) at Durban Conference in December 2011 o As AWG/LCA Vice Chair, helped forge historic Cancun Agreement in December 2010 o Crafted a global approach as lead U.S. technology negotiator in Copenhagen, December 2009 Protecting the stratospheric ozone layer/addressing climate change o Designed/ led U.S. effort to accelerate global phase outs of HCFCs – received EPA Ozone Award o Conceived and built a North American alliance to phase down HFCs o Developed new approaches to destroying
    [Show full text]
  • Melting the Polarization Around Climate Change Politics
    Melting the Polarization Around Climate Change Politics CALE JAFFE* ABSTRACT Climate change has become one of the most highly polarized political prob- lems, but it was not always this way. As recently as 2008, leading Republicans and Democrats agreed on the implications of global warming research. This Article charts how the United States moved from a bipartisan agreement on the need to address climate change to the current state of seemingly intractable polarization. From the perspective of someone who has worked with environ- mental non-pro®ts, this Article suggests that advocates need to disrupt the con- ventional wisdom on climate change politics if they are to achieve lasting success. Tackling a problem like climate change requires sustaining pollution- reduction efforts over many decades, even as the political pendulum continues to swing. Because of that, environmentalists must embrace the goal of cultivat- ing a working coalition regardless of who is in power. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction............................................. 456 II. History: The Science and Politics on Climate Change. 459 A. Climate Research and the Con®rmation of Human-Induced Global Warming........................................... 459 B. Early Partisan Approaches to Climate Policy . 461 C. The Bipartisan Window of Opportunity Remains Open . 465 * Cale Jaffe is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Environmental and Regulatory Law Clinic at the University of Virginia School of Law. He previously served as an attorney and director of the Virginia of®ce of the Southern Environmental Law Center (ªSELCº), an environmental law and policy advocacy organization working at the national, regional, state, and local levels. Some of the ideas in this Article were ®rst sketched out in two editorial columns.
    [Show full text]
  • ECKHARDT.CHP:Corel VENTURA
    United States Department of Agriculture The Human Factor in Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Ecological Research: General Technical Report PNW-GTR-429 An Annotated Bibliography September 1998 Author CAROL ECKHARDT was a social scientist, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331. Report of bibliographic work for interagency agreement DW12935631 between the Forest Service and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Human Factor in Ecological Research: An Annotated Bibliography Carol Eckhardt, Compiler U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-429 September 1998 Abstract Eckhardt, Carol, comp. 1998. The human factor in ecological research: an annotated bibliography. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-429. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 45 p. As a bibliography of annotated references addressing interdisciplinary environmental research, the collection reviews a broad spectrum of literature to illustrate the breadth of issues that bear on the role of humankind in environmental context. Categories of culture, environmental law, public policy, environmental valuation strategies, philos- ophy, interdisciplinary research, landscape theory, design, and management will be useful to interdisciplinary research designers, land use planners and managers, aca- demic faculty and students, environmental stakeholder groups, and anyone with inter- est in people-and-environment
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Digital Earth Between Fragmentation and Wholeness
    The myth of the Digital Earth between fragmentation and wholeness Andrea Ballatore Center for Spatial Studies University of California, Santa Barbara [email protected] Wi: Journal of Mobile Media, 2014 Author copy Abstract Daring predictions of the proximate future can establish shared discursive frameworks, mobilise capital, and steer complex processes. Among the prophetic visions that encouraged and accompanied the development of new communication technologies was the “Digital Earth,” described in a 1998 speech by Al Gore as a high-resolution representation of the planet to share and analyse detailed information about its state. This article traces a genealogy of the Digital Earth as a techno-scientific myth, locating it in a constellation of media futures, arguing that a common subtext of these envisionments consists of a dream of wholeness, an afflatus to overcome perceived fragmentation among humans, and between humans and the Earth. Keywords: Digital Earth, Al Gore, media futures, wholeness, fragmentation, environmentalism, David Bohm, location technologies, Earth-observing media A. Ballatore 2 1. Introduction The ability to collect and communicate information about the Earth is an essential element to human material survival. Hence, it should not come as a surprise that the development of digital media over recent decades has impacted enormously on how Earth- related information is generated, analysed, and stored. Positioning infrastructures, remote sensor networks, geographic information systems, Web-enabled smartphones, virtual globes, digital maps, SatNavs, and location-based services form complex technological assemblages that impact human mobility, reshaping travel modes, geographical imaginations, cultural flows, and the intimate connections between places and people. To capture these developments, human geographers have named these recent trends as “new spatial media”, “neogeography”, and the “geoweb” (Leszczynski and Wilson 2013), while communication scholars recently coined the term "Earth-observing media" (Russill 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a New Environmental Paradigm
    Review Essay Toward a New Environmental Paradigm Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. By Albert Gore, Jr.* Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1992. Pp. 407. $22.95. Robert W. Hahnt CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1720 II. THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SPIRrrTUAL BREAKDOWN. ................. 1722 II. THE POLICY PRESCRIPTIONS: A REvImW AND CRITIQUE ............... 1726 A. The First Pillarof the MarshallPlan: Population Stabilization ...... 1726 B. The Second Pillar of the MarshallPlan: Appropriate Technologies ... 1730 C. The Third Pillarof the Marshall Plan: The Eco-advocate's View of Eco-nomics .......................................... 1732 1. Accounting Frameworksfor a Sustainable World ............. 1732 2. Policy Measuresfor a Sustainable World .................. 1737 * Vice President of the United States of America. Although the author was United States Senator from Tennessee during the writing and initial publication of the book, he will be described throughout this Review Essay by his current title. t Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute; Adjunct Research Fellow, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. I would like to thank Marilyn Arnold and Shantayanan Devarajan for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Elizabeth Baldwin for her research support. Financial support was provided, in part, by the National Science Foundation. This Review Essay represents my views and does not necessarily reflect the views of any individuals or institutions with which I am affiliated. 1719 1720 The Yale Law Journal [Vol. 102: 1719 D. The Fourth Pillarof the Marshall Plan: Treaties are the Answer, but What Was the Question? .............................. 1742 E. The Fifth Pillarof the Marshall Plan: Education and the Thought Police ..................................... 1743 IV. WHAT HAPPENED TO POLITICS? . 1744 A. Politics in Mr Gore's Fantasy World .......................
    [Show full text]