Editorial What the Nose Knows, What The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Editorial What the Nose Knows, What The Neuroscience 190 (2011) 1–11 EDITORIAL WHAT THE NOSE KNOWS, WHAT THE EYES SEE, HOW WE FEEL, HOW WE LEARN, HOW WE UNDERSTAND MOTOR ACTS, WHY “YY” IS ESSENTIAL FOR ION TRANSPORT, HOW EPIGENETICS MEET NEUROBIOLOGY IN RETT SYNDROME: SEVEN TOPICS AT THE 2010 KAVLI PRIZE SYMPOSIUM ON NEUROSCIENCE L. H. BERGERSEN,a M. SANDERb AND Symposium included lectures by: Richard Axel of Colum- J. STORM-MATHISENa* bia University, New York, USA; Tobias Bonhoeffer of Max aDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences and Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany; Centre for Molecular Biology and Neuroscience, University of Oslo, Michael E. Goldberg of Columbia University, New York, PO Box 1105 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway USA; Poul Nissen of Aarhus University, Denmark; Gia- b Page One Editorial Services, 685 Poplar Avenue, Boulder, CO como Rizzolatti of the University of Parma, Italy; and Huda 80304, USA Y Zoghbi of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. The seven symposium lectures described the most The Kavli Prizes were awarded for the second time in recent advances in understanding emotion, olfaction, vi- Oslo, Norway on 7 September, 2010 to eight of the sual information processing, synaptic plasticity, ion flux in world’s most prominent scientists in astrophysics, nano- neurons, perception of self and other, and the conse- science, and neuroscience. Jerry Nelson, of the Univer- quences of epigenetic dysregulation in the human brain. sity of California, Santa Cruz, USA, Ray Wilson, formerly The Kavli Prize Symposium on Neuroscience was or- of Imperial College London and the European Southern ganized by Linda H. Bergersen, Edvard Moser, May-Britt Observatory, and Roger Angel, of the University of Ari- Moser, and Jon Storm-Mathisen, and was made possible zona, Tucson, USA, shared the astrophysics prize for by the combined support of The Kavli Foundation, the their innovative contributions in the field of telescope Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, and the Nor- design. The nanoscience prize was awarded jointly to wegian Ministry of Education and Research. The event US researchers Donald Eigler, of the IBM Almaden Re- was hosted by the University of Oslo, whose rector, Ole search Centre, San Jose, California and Nadrian See- Petter Ottersen, himself a renowned neuroscientist, gave man, of New York University, for developing a method the introductory address. The Kavli Foundation is dedi- for moving single atoms and inventing structural DNA cated to advancing basic research for the benefit of hu- nanotechnology, respectively. Finally, the joint recipi- manity, promoting public understanding of scientific re- ents of the neuroscience prize were US scientists search, and supporting scientists and their work. The par- Thomas Südhof, of Stanford University School of Med- ticipants in the Symposium expressed their gratitude for icine, Richard Scheller, of the biotech company Genen- the opportunity to take part in the great celebration of tech, and James Rothman, of Yale University, for their science, the legacy of Fred Kavli, and the achievements work on the molecular basis of neurotransmitter release of the winners of the 2010 Kavli Prizes. The main points (See review of the laureates’ work by Hussain and of the presentations of the 2010 Kavli Prize Symposium Davanger, 2011, in this issue of Neuroscience). on Neuroscience are summarized below. Readers inter- As part of the week-long Kavli Prize celebration in ested in a more detailed consideration of any of the Oslo, The University of Oslo hosted The Kavli Prize Sym- topics discussed at the Symposium are referred to the posium on Neuroscience on 6 September, 2010, an event reading list at the end of this article. designed to celebrate excellence in Neuroscience re- search. At this Symposium, seven leading neuroscientists Antonio Damasio described their groundbreaking research, covering a di- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA verse selection of problems in Neurobiology. Starting with The Neuroscience of Emotion and Consciousness a “public awareness” lecture by Antonio Damasio of the Antonio Damasio opened the Symposium with a des- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA, the ignated public awareness lecture, in which he elegantly *Corresponding author. Tel: ϩ47-97193044; fax: ϩ47-22851278. described recent developments in understanding the neu- E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Storm-Mathisen). rological bases of emotion. Damasio emphasized the fact Abbreviations: FHM2, familial hemiplegic migraine 2; LIP, lateral intra- parietal area; MD, monocular deprivation; MeCP2, methyl-CpG-bind- that multiple cortical and noncortical brain regions, includ- ing protein 2; NKA, NaϩKϩATPase; SM, an anonymous patient. ing the insular cortex, the amygdala, and brain stem re- 0306-4522/11 $ - see front matter © 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.036 1 2 L. H. Bergersen et al. / Neuroscience 190 (2011) 1–11 gions, express neural circuits that are active during human For example, Damasio and other neuroscientists have emotional experience. extensively studied the patient “SM,” who has the rare Early neuroscientists treated the study of emotion and genetic disorder Urbach–Wiethe disease. Because of feeling with deference, and consequently focused most of this condition, SM has focal bilateral brain damage in the their research effort on other neurobiological functions and subcortical brain, resulting in loss of all functional re- mechanisms. However, recent work, including Damasio’s sponse in the amygdala. Experimental studies showed own studies, suggests that emotions have significant bio- that SM completely lacks normal fear responses. Thus, logical importance, despite early tendencies among neu- when presented with fear-inducing triggers, such as spi- roscientists to minimize their relevance to cognitive per- ders, snakes, or videos of violent acts, SM’s reaction is ception of the external environment. Researchers now characterized by excessive approach, lack of with- appreciate that emotions are associated with complex and drawal, lack of facial, or postural reactions typical of a important behavioral programs and physiological re- fear response, and lack of fear conditioning. While SM’s sponses, and that these programs are mechanisms by subjective rating of fear-inducing film clips scored Ͻ1on which the individual being, human or animal, solves spe- a scale of 1–10 (normal control score was in the range cific situational problems or life-threatening encounters. In 4–7), the patient reported a normal intensity of subjec- fact, for animal species that have a lower cognitive capac- tive experience of sadness, anger, surprise, happiness, ity than Homo sapiens, such emotional/behavioral pro- and disgust. Similarly, sampling over a 3-month or a grams can be highly advantageous. For humans, emo- 1-year period, SM reported normal frequency of emo- tional responses provide great benefit in many situations, tional states other than fear, but virtually no experience but can conflict with social and/or cultural conventions in of fear. Nevertheless, SM was capable of experiencing other situations. “chemo-induced” fear, when exposed to inhaled CO . According to Damasio, emotions are “complex pro- 2 This result demonstrates that the emotion of fear is grams of actions triggered by the presence of certain evoked by two parallel neurosensory pathways, one stimuli”. The triggers can be perceived as external or internal phenomena, and the emotions elicited by these dependent on an external stimulus (defective in SM) and stimuli have been grouped into several classes, includ- the other dependent on an internal stimulus (intact in ing the primary emotions (fear, anger, happiness, sad- SM). ness, disgust), background emotions (enthusiasm, dis- Real-time magnetoencephalographic (MEG) studies couragement) and complex social emotions (compas- of the normal neurological response to emotionally com- sion, shame, contempt, pride, and awe/admiration). petent visual stimuli demonstrated that emotions are Emotions are not learned behaviors; instead, they are activated in distinct kinetic stages involving different genetically-encoded responses to specific objects or cortical areas (Fig. 1). A recent study showed that pleas- events that correlate with neurological activity in specific ant and unpleasant visual stimuli induce strong neuro- brain regions. Emotional programs are enacted in well- logical activity in the orbitofrontal cortex, ventromedial defined stages, including initial cognitive appraisal, trig- prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and somatosensory gering, execution, and finally, physiological impact or cortices 350–500 ms after stimulation. Less strong re- upheaval. sponses were noted in the visual cortex in the 70–200 In normal individuals, neurological activity in specific ms time frame, and in the ventral visual stream, tem- brain regions correlates with specific emotions. How- poropolar and orbitofrontal regions in the 200–350 ms ever, some of these specific responses are altered or time frame. Stronger activity correlated with more emo- absent in individuals with impaired emotional capacity. tionally competent stimuli. These data suggest complex Fig. 1. Dynamics of the human cerebral cortex during the induction of emotion by visual stimuli. The figure illustrates temporal phases of magnetoencephalographic evoked cortical responses during experience of pleasurable feelings. The order
Recommended publications
  • Cfa in the News ~ Week Ending 3 January 2010
    Wolbach Library: CfA in the News ~ Week ending 3 January 2010 1. New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 2. 2009 in science and medicine, ROGER SCHLUETER, Belleville News Democrat (IL), Sunday, January 3, 2010 3. 'Science, celestial bodies have always inspired humankind', Staff Correspondent, Hindu (India), Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4. Why is Carpenter defending scientists?, The Morning Call, Morning Call (Allentown, PA), FIRST ed, pA25, Sunday, December 27, 2009 5. CORRECTIONS, OPINION BY RYAN FINLEY, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star (AZ), FINAL ed, pA2, Saturday, December 19, 2009 6. We see a 'Super-Earth', TOM BEAL; TOM BEAL, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star, (AZ), FINAL ed, pA1, Thursday, December 17, 2009 Record - 1 DIALOG(R) New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 TEXT: "In this paper we report on testing the 'rolen model' and 'opportunity-structure' hypotheses about the parents whom scientists mentioned as career influencers. According to the role-model hypothesis, the gender match between scientist and influencer is paramount (for example, women scientists would disproportionately often mention their mothers as career influencers)," scientists writing in the journal Social Studies of Science report (see also ). "According to the opportunity-structure hypothesis, the parent's educational level predicts his/her probability of being mentioned as a career influencer (that ism parents with higher educational levels would be more likely to be named). The examination of a sample of American scientists who had received prestigious postdoctoral fellowships resulted in rejecting the role-model hypothesis and corroborating the opportunity-structure hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
    THE DECADE OF DISCOVERY IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee Board on Physics and Astronomy Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1991 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS • 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW • Washington, DC 20418 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special compe_nces and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. This project was supported by the Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FGO5- 89ER40421, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-8901685, the Naval Research Laboratory under Contract No. N00173-90-M-9744, and the Smithsonian Institution under Purchase Order No. SF0022430000. Additional support was provided by the Maurice Ewing Earth and Planetary Sciences Fund of the National Academy of Sciences created through a gift from the Palisades Geophysical Institute, Inc., and an anonymous donor. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data National Research Council (U.S.). Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee. The decade of discovery in astronomy and astrophysics / Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee, Board on Physics and Astronomy, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, National Research Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kavli Prize Laureate Lecture
    The Kavli Prize Laureate Lecture 24 April 2013, 17:00 – 20:00 The Nordic Embassies in Berlin, Rauchstraße 1, 10787 Berlin-Tiergarten In co-operation with: Berlinffff The Kavli Prize is a partnership between The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, The Kavli Foundation and The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research Programme: 16:30 Registration Please be seated by 16:55 17:00 Welcome Sven E. Svedman, Norwegian Ambassador to Germany 17:05 ”The Kavli Prize: fostering scientific excellence and international cooperation” Ms Kristin Halvorsen, Norwegian Minister of Education and Research 17:20 „Internationale Herausforderungen – internationale Kooperationen: Der Auftrag der Wissenschaft“ Prof. Dr. Johanna Wanka, Federal Minister of Education and Research 17:35 Short remarks Prof. Dr. Herbert Jäckle, Vice President of the Max Planck Society 17:40 Short remarks Professor Kirsti Strøm Bull President of The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters 17:45 Lecture: “Following the Brain’s Wires” Kavli Prize Laureate Prof. Dr. Winfried Denk Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg 18:10 Lecture: “Towards an Understanding of Neural Codes” Prof. Dr. Gilles Laurent Director of the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt 18:35 Reception Exhibition Hall of the Nordic Embassies in Berlin “Following the Brain’s Wires” Kavli Prize Laureate Prof. Dr. Winfried Denk To understand neural circuits we need to know how neurons are connected. Over the past decade we have developed methods that allow the reconstruction of neural wiring diagrams via the acquisition and analysis of high-resolution three-dimensional electron microscopic data. We have applied these methods to the retina in order to explore, for example, how direction-selective signals are computed.
    [Show full text]
  • Astro2010: the Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey
    Astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey Notices of Interest 1. 4 m space telescope for terrestrial planet imaging and wide field astrophysics Point of Contact: Roger Angel, University of Arizona Summary Description: The proposed 4 m telescope combines capabilities for imaging terrestrial exoplanets and for general astrophysics without compromising either. Extremely high contrast imaging at very close inner working angle, as needed for terrestrial planet imaging, is accomplished by the powerful phase induced amplitude apodization method (PIAA) developed by Olivier Guyon. This method promises 10-10 contrast at 2.0 l/D angular separation, i.e. 50 mas for a 4 m telescope at 500 nm wavelength. The telescope primary mirror is unobscured with off-axis figure, as needed to achieve such high contrast. Despite the off-axis primary, the telescope nevertheless provides also a very wide field for general astrophysics. A 3 mirror anastigmat design by Jim Burge delivers a 6 by 24 arcminute field whose mean wavefront error of 12 nm rms, i.e.diffraction limited at 360 nm wavelength. Over the best 10 square arcminutes the rms error is 7 nm, for diffraction limited imaging at 200 nm wavelength. Any of the instruments can be fed by part or all of the field, by means of a flat steering mirror at the exit pupil. To allow for this, the field is curved with a radius equal to the distance from the exit pupil. The entire optical system fits in a 4 m diameter cylinder, 8 m long. Many have considered that only by using two spacecraft, a conventional on-axis telescope and a remote occulter, could high contrast and wide field imaging goals be reconciled.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnegie Astronomical Telescopes in the 21St Century
    YEAR BOOK02/03 2002–2003 CARNEGIEINSTITUTIONOFWASHINGTON tel 202.387.6400 CARNEGIE INSTITUTION 1530 P Street, NW CARNEGIE INSTITUTION fax 202.387.8092 OF WASHINGTON OF WASHINGTON Washington, DC 20005 web site www.CarnegieInstitution.org New Horizons for Science YEAR BOOK 02/03 2002-2003 Year Book 02/03 THE PRESIDENT’ S REPORT July 1, — June 30, CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON ABOUT CARNEGIE Department of Embryology 115 West University Parkway Baltimore, MD 21210-3301 410.554.1200 . TO ENCOURAGE, IN THE BROADEST AND MOST LIBERAL MANNER, INVESTIGATION, Geophysical Laboratory 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. RESEARCH, AND DISCOVERY, AND THE Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8900 APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF MANKIND . Department of Global Ecology 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305-4101 The Carnegie Institution of Washington 650.325.1521 The Carnegie Observatories was incorporated with these words in 1902 813 Santa Barbara St. by its founder, Andrew Carnegie. Since Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 626.577.1122 then, the institution has remained true to Las Campanas Observatory its mission. At six research departments Casilla 601 La Serena, Chile across the country, the scientific staff and Department of Plant Biology a constantly changing roster of students, 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305-4101 postdoctoral fellows, and visiting investiga- 650.325.1521 tors tackle fundamental questions on the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism frontiers of biology, earth sciences, and 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. Washington, DC 20015-1305 astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the World's Largest Observatory OTHER RECOMMENDED BOOKS by BARRY PARKER
    STAIRWAY TO THE STARS The Story of the World's Largest Observatory OTHER RECOMMENDED BOOKS BY BARRY PARKER THE VINDICATION OF THE BIG BANG Breakthroughs and Barriers COSMIC TIME TRAVEL A Scientific Odyssey COLLIDING GALAXIES The Universe in Turmoil INVISIBLE MATTER AND THE FATE OF THE UNIVERSE CREATION The Story of the Origin and Evolution of the Universe SEARCH FOR A SUPERTHEORY From Atoms to Superstrings EINSTEIN'SDREAM The Search for a Unified Theory of the Universe STAIRWAY TO THE STARS The Story of the World's Largest Observatory Barry Parker Drawings by Lori Scoffield PERSEUS PUBLISHING Cambridge, Massachusetts Library of Congress Cataloging-in-publication Data Parker, Barry R. Stairway to the stars • the story of the world's largsst obsarvatory / Barry Parker ; drawings by Lori Scoffield. p. cm. Includes bibliographica1 references and index. ISBN 0-306-44763-0 1. Astronomical observatories—Hawall—Mauna Kea—History. 2. Parker, Barry R, 3, Astronomers—United States—Biography. I. Title. QB82.U62M387 1994 522' . 19969' 1—dc2Q 94-21016 CIP CBSW Publishing books are available at special discounts for bulk purchases in the U.S. by corporations, institutions, and other organizations. For more information, please contact the Special Markets Department at the Perseus Books Group, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, or call (617} 252-5298. ISBN 0-7382-0578-8 © 1994 Barry Parker Published by Perseus Publishing A Member of the Perseus Books Group 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher Printed in the United States of America Preface It is early morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Essential for Ion Transport, How Epigenetics Meet Neurobiology in Rett Syndrome: Seven Topics at the 2010 Kavli Prize Symposium on Neuroscience
    Neuroscience 190 (2011) 1–11 EDITORIAL WHAT THE NOSE KNOWS, WHAT THE EYES SEE, HOW WE FEEL, HOW WE LEARN, HOW WE UNDERSTAND MOTOR ACTS, WHY “YY” IS ESSENTIAL FOR ION TRANSPORT, HOW EPIGENETICS MEET NEUROBIOLOGY IN RETT SYNDROME: SEVEN TOPICS AT THE 2010 KAVLI PRIZE SYMPOSIUM ON NEUROSCIENCE L. H. BERGERSEN,a M. SANDERb AND Symposium included lectures by: Richard Axel of Colum- J. STORM-MATHISENa* bia University, New York, USA; Tobias Bonhoeffer of Max aDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences and Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany; Centre for Molecular Biology and Neuroscience, University of Oslo, Michael E. Goldberg of Columbia University, New York, PO Box 1105 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway USA; Poul Nissen of Aarhus University, Denmark; Gia- b Page One Editorial Services, 685 Poplar Avenue, Boulder, CO como Rizzolatti of the University of Parma, Italy; and Huda 80304, USA Y Zoghbi of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. The seven symposium lectures described the most The Kavli Prizes were awarded for the second time in recent advances in understanding emotion, olfaction, vi- Oslo, Norway on 7 September, 2010 to eight of the sual information processing, synaptic plasticity, ion flux in world’s most prominent scientists in astrophysics, nano- neurons, perception of self and other, and the conse- science, and neuroscience. Jerry Nelson, of the Univer- quences of epigenetic dysregulation in the human brain. sity of California, Santa Cruz, USA, Ray Wilson, formerly The Kavli Prize Symposium on Neuroscience was or- of Imperial College London and the European Southern ganized by Linda H. Bergersen, Edvard Moser, May-Britt Observatory, and Roger Angel, of the University of Ari- Moser, and Jon Storm-Mathisen, and was made possible zona, Tucson, USA, shared the astrophysics prize for by the combined support of The Kavli Foundation, the their innovative contributions in the field of telescope Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, and the Nor- design.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2014
    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2014 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2014. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Joseph Adams Seungkirl Ahn Hashim Al-Hashimi Luis Amaral Kjersti Aagard-Tillery Michael Adams Tero Ahola Javey Ali Rommie Amaro Duur Aanen Paul Adams Cyrus Aidun Antonios Aliprantis Bruno Amati Jorge Abad Ralf Adams Iannis Aifantis Kari Alitalo Jayakrishna Ambati Alejandro Aballay Lee Adamson Kazuyuki Aihara Rob Alkemade Richard Ambinder Adam Abate John Adelman Judd Aiken Michael Alkire Stanley Ambrose Alireza Abbaspourrad Karen Adelman Elizabeth Ainsworth Robin Allaby Indu Ambudkar Jonathan Abbatt Zach Adelman William Aird Milan P. Allan Chris Amemiya Patrick Abbot Pia Ädelroth Edoardo Airoldi Marc Allard Jan Amend Albert Abbott Sarah Ades Joanna Aizenberg Hunt Allcott Amal Amer Allison Abbott Ilensami Adesida Michael Aizenberg Martin Allday Stefan Ameres Derek Abbott Becky Adkins Myles Akabas Andrew Allen Sebastian Amigorena Larry Abbott Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Ilke Akartuna Charles Allen Mohammed Amin Nicholas Abbott Andy Adler Erol Akcay Dale Allen Ido Amit Paul Abbyad Frederick Adler Mark Akeson David Allen Gabriel Amitai Omar Abdel-Wahab Gregory Adler Christopher Akey Eric Allen Sygal Amitay Yalchin Abdullaev Lynn Adler Ethan Akin Irving Allen Markus Ammann Ikuro Abe Roee Admon Shizuo Akira James Allen David Amodio Jun-ichi Abe Ralph Adolphs Gustav Akk John Allen Angelika Amon Koji Abe Jose Adrio Mikael Akke Karen Allen Christopher Amos Goncalo Abecasis Radoslav Adzic Serap Aksoy Melinda Allen Linda Amos Stephen Abedon Markus Aebi Anastasia Aksyuk Nicola Allen Derk Amsen Markus Abel Toni Aebischer Klaus Aktories Paul Allen Ronald Amundson Moshe Abeles G.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit the National Academies Press Online, the Authoritative Source For
    Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee, Board on Physics and Astronomy, Space Studies Board, National Research Council ISBN: 0-309-50139-3, 276 pages, 7 x 10, (2001) This free PDF was downloaded from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9839.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online for free • Purchase printed books and PDF files • Explore our innovative research tools – try the Research Dashboard now • Sign up to be notified when new books are published Thank you for downloading this free PDF. If you have comments, questions or want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll-free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This book plus thousands more are available at www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF file are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Distribution or copying is strictly prohibited without permission of the National Academies Press <http://www.nap.edu/permissions/>. Permission is granted for this material to be posted on a secure password-protected Web site. The content may not be posted on a public Web site. Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9839.html Copyright © National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010
    Annual report 2010 Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for the Biology of Memory Annual report 2010 Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for the Biology of Memory The staff at KI/CBM March 2011. (Photo: Ned Alley) Front page: The cornerstone laid by Minister of Research and Higher Education Tora Aasland for the new Norwegian Brain Centre in Trondheim is a crystal with a reconstruction of a real brain cell from a rat. Annual report 2010 Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for the Biology of Memory CoNTENT NTNU NTNU strengthens, unifies and sharpens brain research ................................ 2 Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience and Centre for Teleportation sheds light on memory’s mechanisms ...................................... 3 the Biology of Memory Rats are born navigators ................................................................................... 4 Laura Colgin receives the International Gruber Award .................................... 6 On the trail of the brain’s cartographer ............................................................. 7 A cavalcade of award winners ............................................................................ 8 Neuroscience can provide a cure for Fragile X syndrome ................................ 9 Making the brain more visible ........................................................................... 10 Who’s who at KI/CBM ......................................................................................... 11 Annual accounts
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewers [PDF]
    The Journal of Neuroscience, January 2008, 28(1) Acknowledgment For Reviewers The Editors depend heavily on outside reviewers informing opinions about papers submitted to the Journal and would like to formally thank the following individuals for their help during the past year. Catherine Abbadie Vellareddy Anantharam Stephen Alexander Baccus Allan I. Basbaum Larry Abbott Julie K. Andersen Michael Bach Greg J. Bashaw Koji Abe Richard A. Andersen Jocelyne Bachevalier Andrius Baskys Moshe Abeles Adam Anderson Hilmar Bading Joseph Bass Asa Abeliovich Aileen J. Anderson David Badre Tobias Bast Anissa Abi-Dargham David J. Anderson Wolfgang Baehr Amy J. Bastian Carmela R. Abraham Marjorie Anderson Wyeth Bair Mike Bate Wickliffe C. Abraham Michael C. Anderson Douglas H. Baird Gillian Bates Andrey Y. Abramov Patrick N. Anderson Sandra M. Bajjalieh Claudia M. C. Batista Thomas W. Abrams Anuska Andjelkovic Chris Baker Michael J. Baum Jorge Aceves Rodrigo Andrade David Baker Parveen Bawa Susan Ackerman Katrin Andreasson Harriet Baker Laurence Bayer Carlos Acun˜a Michael C. Andresen Mark D. Baker Howard Baylis David John Adams R. David Andrew Robert Baker Denis Baylor Crista L. Adamson Anne Milasincic Andrews Vaishali P. Bakshi Nicolas G. Bazan Roger A. H. Adan Nancy Andrews Carey D. Balaban Mark Bear Louise Adermark Tim Andrews Evan Balaban Christine Elizabeth Beattie Ralph Adolphs O. Andrievskaia Fausto Giacomo Baldissera Michael Stephen Beattie Joelle Adrien Siew-Lan Ang Brian A. Baldo Michael Beauchamp Patrick Aebischer Alessandra Angelucci William Harold Baldridge Christian Beaulieu Neeraj Agarwal Jesus Angulo David John Balfour Vahri Beaumont John Aggleton Hymie Anisman Gregory F. Ball Antoine Bechara Salvatore Maria Aglioti Lucio Annunziato Tamas Balla Ute Becherer Aric Agmon Josef Anrather Klaus Ballanyi Diane Beck Adriano Aguzzi Mark S.
    [Show full text]
  • Links with Astronomy Groups and Organisations at Home and Abroad
    i CONTENTS IAU Information Bulletin No. 106 Preface EVENTS & DEADLINES 1. The International Year of Astronomy 2009 1.1 Review ……………….………………………………………… 4 1.2 Legacy Activities …………………………………………….… 9 2. Office for Astronomy Development 2.1 Selection of Host Organisation ………………………..….…… 21 2.2 Director of the OAD ………………...………………..……… 26 2.3 Establishment of Regional Offices ……………………….…… 27 3. Women in Astronomy ………………………………………………… 28 4. Prizes and Awards 4.1 The PPGF Cosmology Prize 2010 …………………….….…… 34 4.2 The PPGF Fellowship Award 2011 ……………………....….… 35 5. Executive Committee 5.1 Officers’ Meeting, Paris, 25-27 January, 2010 ………...………… 36 5.2 EC88, Baltimore, 11-13 May, 2010 ………………………….… 37 5.3 EC89, Prague, 24-26 May, 2011 ………………..……………… 39 6. IAU General Assemblies 6.1 XVIIIth General Assembly, Beijing, 20-31 August, 2012 …….… 39 6.2 XIXth General Assembly, Honolulu, August 2015 …………..… 39 6.3 IAU XXX General Assembly in 2018 …………………………. 39 7. IAU Divisions, Commissions, Working Groups and Services 7.1 Updated Overview …………………………………………… 40 7.2 CBAT ………………………………………………………… 58 7.3 Standards of Fundamental Astronomy ……………..………… 58 8. Scientific Meetings 8.1 Post-meeting Reports 2009 …………………………………… 58 8.2 Meetings in 2010 8.2.1 Symposia ……………………………..……………… 71 8.2.2 Regional Meetings …………………………………… 78 8.2.3 Co-sponsored meetings ……………………………… 79 8.3 Meetings in 2011 8.3.1 Symposia ………………………………..…………… 79 8.3.2 Regional Meetings …………………………………… 87 8.4 Other meetings of astrophysical interest ………………….…… 87 ii 9. Educational Meetings and Activities 9.1 ISYA 9.1.1 ISYA 2009 Trinidad & Tobago Report ……...….……. 88 9.1.2 ISYA 2010 Armenia …………………….…………… 90 9.2 WWDA 9.2.1 Paraguay, September 2009 …………………………… 91 9.2.2 Senegal, January 2010 …………………………………93 9.2.3 Current and future activities ………….……………… 95 9.3 TAD 9.3.1 Bolivia, June-July 2009 ………………………..……… 95 9.3.2 Nairobi, November 2009 ………………...…………… 96 9.3.3 Gaza and the West Bank …………………...………… 97 9.3.4 CAP2010, Capetown, March 2010 …………………… 97 9.3.5 Planned activities ………………………………..…… 97 9.4 NASE ………………………………………….…….……….
    [Show full text]